Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_903_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1: SAGES University MASTERS PROGRAM: Hernia Pathway
- •Hernia Surgery Curriculum
- •Facebook™ Groups
- •References
- •2: Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
- •Mesh Fixation
- •Bowel Injury
- •Seroma
- •Pain Management
- •Hernia Recurrence
- •References
- •3: Masters Program Hernia Pathway: Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia
- •Introduction
- •Laparoscopic Anatomy
- •Hernia Defect Assessment
- •Defect Closure
- •Mesh Placement
- •Closure
- •Complications
- •References
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Material
- •Weight/Density
- •Porosity
- •Filament Design
- •Anti-adhesion Barriers
- •Additional Mesh Considerations
- •Self-Fixating Mesh
- •Anisotropy
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Biologic Mesh
- •Strattice™
- •XenMatrix™
- •Permacol™
- •Absorbable Synthetic Mesh
- •P4HB
- •Hybrid Mesh
- •References
- •7: Prosthetic Fixation Options
- •The Science of Fixation
- •Inguinal Hernia
- •Laparoscopic Preperitoneal
- •Open Anterior Approach
- •Ventral Hernia
- •Intraperitoneal Mesh Placement
- •Retrorectus Mesh Placement
- •Onlay
- •Hiatal Hernia
- •References
- •Step 2: Clinical Details
- •Step 5: Preoperative Planning
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Surgical History
- •Smoking
- •Obesity
- •Diabetes
- •Other Comorbid Conditions
- •Preoperative Workup
- •Laboratory Studies
- •Imaging
- •Perioperative Considerations
- •Anticoagulation
- •Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
- •Postoperative Considerations
- •References
- •Pre-operative Phase
- •Peri-operative Phase
- •Post-operative Phase
- •Patient Education
- •Appendix 1: UW Medicine Hernia ERAS Protocol
- •Complex Hernia Clinical Pathway
- •Complex Hernia Clinical Pathway
- •Complex Hernia Clinical Pathway
- •Complex Hernia Clinical Pathway
- •Appendix 2: Patient-Friendly Hernia Care Map
- •References
- •Myofascial Anatomy
- •Neurovascular Anatomy
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Surgeon Versus Radiologists Image Interpretation
- •Appendix: CT Atlas
- •References
- •12: Umbilical Hernia Options
- •Getting Started
- •Laparoscopic IPOM Repair
- •Robotic IPOM
- •Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal (TAPP) Approach
- •Rives StoppaRetro-Rectus Repair
- •Posterior Component Separation
- •Cirrhosis
- •History
- •Technique
- •Procedure
- •Postoperative Management
- •Complications
- •References
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Overview
- •Patient Selection
- •Operative Technique
- •Patient Positioning
- •Trocar Placement
- •Docking
- •Dissection
- •Defect Closure
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Operative Steps
- •Bibliography
- •16: Technique: Posterior Rectus Sheath Release
- •Introduction
- •Technique
- •Patient Selection
- •Outcomes
- •References
- •17: Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair: Technique—External Oblique Release
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Surgery
- •Preoperative/Markings
- •Surgical Technique
- •Open Components Separation
- •Laparoscopic Components Separation
- •Periumbilical Perforator-Sparing Technique
- •Minimally Invasive Components Separation (MICS)
- •Posterior Technique
- •Postoperative Management
- •Complications
- •Infection
- •Seroma
- •Results
- •References
- •18: Technique: Transversus Abdominis Release
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Technical Aspects
- •Postoperative Care
- •Outcomes
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Technique Overview
- •Patient Selection
- •Retromuscular Dissection
- •Midline Dissection
- •Transversus Abdominis Release
- •Double Dock, Contralateral Dissection
- •References
- •Introduction
- •eTEP
- •Upper Midline Defect
- •Lower Midline Defects
- •Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR)
- •Closure
- •Mesh Placement
- •Transabdominal Approach
- •Postoperative Management
- •Mesh Placement
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Techniques
- •Outcomes
- •Complications
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Our Technique
- •Other Uses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Surgical Technique
- •Indications
- •Non-midline Hernias
- •Parastomal Hernia Repairs
- •Drawbacks/Pitfalls
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Diagnosis
- •Stoma Relocation
- •Primary Repair
- •Parastomal Hernia Mesh Repair
- •Onlay Mesh
- •Underlay Mesh Placement
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Spigelian Hernias
- •Surgical Technique
- •Open Repair
- •MIS Repair
- •Flank Hernias
- •Surgical Technique
- •Open Repair
- •MIS Repair
- •Surgical Technique
- •Open Repair
- •MIS Repair
- •References
- •26: Recurrent Ventral Hernia Repair
- •Introduction
- •Smoking
- •Diabetes
- •Obesity
- •Laparoscopic Recurrent Ventral Hernia Repair
- •Open Recurrent Ventral Hernia Repair
- •Special Considerations
- •Contaminated Fields
- •Soft Tissue Coverage
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Classification
- •Definition
- •Pathophysiology
- •Local Alterations
- •Systemic Alterations
- •Musculoskeletal Dysfunction
- •Ventilatory Dysfunction
- •Chronic Gastrointestinal Dysfunction
- •Psychosocial Issues
- •Transverse Abdominal Release Technique TAR
- •Albanese Technique
- •Adjuvant Techniques
- •Progressive Preoperative Pneumoperitoneum (PPP)
- •Botulinum Toxin
- •Tissue Expanders
- •Summary
- •Bibliography
- •Introduction
- •Fixation Versus No Fixation
- •Permanent Versus Absorbable Tacks
- •Penetrating Fixation Versus Glue Fixation
- •Self-Fixating Mesh
- •Evidence
- •Recommendations
- •References
- •Relevant Neuroanatomy
- •General Principles
- •Bassini Repair
- •McVay Cooper’s Ligament Repair
- •Shouldice
- •Technique
- •Lichtenstein
- •Plug-and-Patch
- •Post-herniorrhaphy Inguinodynia
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Aspects
- •Operative Aspects
- •Robotic TAPP (rTAPP)
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Operative Setup
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Open Repair
- •Laparoscopic Repair
- •Repair vs. Watchful Waiting
- •Pain
- •Early Complications
- •Robot
- •Recommendations
- •Watchful Waiting
- •Open Repair
- •Laparoscopic or Robotic Repair
- •Laparoscopic vs. Open Repair
- •References
- •Introduction
- •TEP vs. TAPP
- •Complications
- •Operative Time
- •Postoperative Pain
- •Chronic Groin Pain
- •Recurrence
- •Cost
- •Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (rTAPP) vs. TAPP
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Anatomical Basis
- •Salient Features
- •Indications
- •Preparation
- •Port Setup
- •References
- •Introduction
- •What Is Mini-laparoscopy?
- •Why Use Mini-laparoscopy?
- •Mini-laparoscopic TAPP
- •Mini-laparoscopic TEP
- •References
- •35: The Cavernous Direct Inguinal Hernia
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Epidemiology
- •Etiology/Pathogenesis
- •Laparoscopic Robotic-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Approach
- •Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •References
- •Femoral Hernias
- •Hidden Inguinal Hernias
- •References

132
A. S. Wright and R. P. Petersen
Standardized discharge criteria are important and help make sure that all members of the team, the patient, and the patient’s support structure are all in alignment.
There is no need to await bowel movement prior to discharge. Patient-friendly care
maps can be posted on the wall or on a whiteboard in each room to help with communication of these goals, which typically are: (1) tolerating diet and taking sufcient oral intake, (2) on a sustainable oral pain regimen, and (3) able to assume
self-care or has adequate help to ensure safety.
Patient Education
Patient and caregiver education is essential in any ERAS program, and this starts at
the rst pre-operative clinic visit. Good patient education results in shorter hospital
stays, less need for analgesia, increased patient satisfaction, and increased patient
compliance [60, 61]. Clear written guidelines should include specic goals for each
day, the expected length of stay, and discharge criteria. These patient-friendly care
maps should be designed for patients with potentially limited health literacy, include
visuals and images, and ideally be available in multiple languages. They should also
follow the patient into the hospital, and in our practice are posted in each patient’s
room in order to help with coordination and communication. Our hernia care map is
seen in Appendix 2.
Design andImplementation ofanERAS pathway
Every hospital has its own institutional culture, and therefore each ERAS pathway
will be to some degree unique in response to clinical practices, administrative support, and patient population [62]. A suggested plan and timeline for implementation
can be found on the SAGES SMART website at https://www.sages.org/enhanced-
recovery/sages-smart-implementation-timeline/ [63]. The development process
should start with identication and recruitment of champions from a multidisciplinary team, including from surgery, nursing, anesthesia, pharmacy, physical and
occupational therapy, nutrition, and information technology. The importance of
administration buy-in cannot be overstated, and it can be particularly helpful to
build a business-case to support the investment in time and money that implementation requires [64]. Current practices need to be reviewed, along with an assessment
of evidence-based guidelines. After a draft protocol has been developed, it needs to
be presented to relevant stakeholders and edited based on feedback. Once nalized
it needs to be translated into actionable items, including standardized forms, templates, patient education materials, and order sets. Auditable metrics such as cost,
length of stay, and readmission rates need to be identied and tracked well before
the go-live date, in order to be able to measure any positive or negative impact of the

10 Enhanced Recovery inAbdominal Hernia Repair
133
ERAS pathway [65]. It is important to set timelines for review and revision after
go-live, and it is frequent for pathways to need to be modied based on patient outcomes, new practice patterns, or new developments.
Appendix 1: UW Medicine Hernia ERAS Protocol
Complex Hernia Clinical Pathway
Activities Before Surgery
Week-4 to -6 Day-5 to -6 Day-1
Clinic Visit • Implement strong for surgery
pre-hospital clinical interventions
• RN teach class: Patient CareMap
and reference Med Consult note
– Tell patient to bring most current
medication list to hospital for
review and bring home medication
bottles for review (cannot take in
hospital)
• Clinic provide patient with 2×8oz
of apple juice and directs patient to
drink 1×8oz before midnight night
prior to surgery and 1×8oz after
parking at hospital day of surgery
• PCC schedules follow-up visit for 2
weeks post-op (encourage patient to
schedule 1-week post-op with PCP
immediately following call)
• Consent signed
• MRSA/MSSA screen
Diet • Drink 1×8oz of
Medications
Other • Patient to follow
• Impact drink 6
days prior
(optional)
• If MRSA/
MSSA positive,
Intranasal
Mupirocin for 5
days prior
apple juice before
midnight
• No food after
midnight, clear
liquids as
instructed
pre-surgery
shower and
shaving
instructions
• Patient to bring
1×8oz bottles of
apple juice to
hospital

134
A. S. Wright and R. P. Petersen
Complex Hernia Clinical Pathway
Day 0: Pre-, Intra-, and Post-Operative Milestones
Pre-OP Intra-OP
Pain • 1000mg Acetaminophen po (then
Diet • Carbo loading: apple juice 2–3h
Fluids • If IV in place, LR at 50mL/h • Induction period—7mL/kg of LR
Mobility
Medications • Abx per standard pre-op orders
Vitals/
Monitoring
Equipment • Portable sequential compression
Support
Services
Other • Patients should be admitted in
po or IV q6h until discharge)
• Gabapentin 300mg po (continued
once tolerating pills again)
• Thoracic Epidural—aimed at upper
level of incision (tested with 3mL
1.5% Lidocaine w/Epi 1:200K)
prior to surgery; patient directed to
drink 1×8oz immediately after
parking at the hospital
– If MRSA positive; administer
Vancomycin and abx per standard
pre-op orders
• For Bowel Resection ONLY (5% of
cases); minimum of 30min prior:
Alvimopan 12mg po q12h until
rst B.M. or discharge
– Unless chronic opioid user (on
narcotics within 1 week of
surgery)
• Heparin 5000 units subcu
• Blood glucose check. If >100,
recheck 30–60min after incision. If
>140 start insulin GTT
devices on in pre-op
inpatient status
• Have sleeve patients void prior to
moving back to OR
• Pain: 1/16% Bupivacaine plus
Fentanyl 2μg/mL infused at 10mL/h
started ASAP after anesthesia
induction. Avoid systemic opiates
(especially Morphine and Dilaudid)
over 30min
• During surgery—5mL/kg/h of
LR.Target a urine output of
0.3–0.5mL/kg/h
• Blood loss—replace with colloid (5%
Albumin) mL for mL
• Abx per standard intra-op orders
• Continue glucose management
• Place Foley
• No nasogastric tubes (remove at end
of case if placed for gastric
decompression)
• Abdominal binder for comfort per
surgeon discretion

10 Enhanced Recovery inAbdominal Hernia Repair
Complex Hernia Clinical Pathway
Day 0: Pre-, Intra-, and Post-Operative Milestones
PAC U
Pain • Changed to PCEA with 6mL/h infusion
Diet
Fluids • LR at 1mL/kh/h
Mobility
Medications
Vitals/Monitoring • Continue glucose management
Equipment
Support Services
Other
• Breakthrough pain: Epidural Fentanyl (25–50μg) (followed by 3cm
NS) and infusion increased, by 2mL/h—followed by increased
Bupivacaine concentration (1/10% then 1/8%) if BP okay
– If BP low or marginal or pressors ongoing talk with surgeons about
ketorolac (vs. bleeding vs. nephrotoxic risks vs. anastomotic risk). If
BP unable to be controlled with low dose pressors or uid bolus
3
(500cm
) “split” epidural (take fentanyl out of epidural infusion and
add IV opiate PCA) in preparation for, or as start of, stopping epidural
• Target urine output of 0.3–0.5mL/kg/h
135
3
Complex Hernia Clinical Pathway
Inpatient Milestones: Target Post-op LOS=3–4 Days
Day 0 Day 1
Pain • PCEA and acetaminophen PO continued. After
Diet • Ice chips and sips of clears • Advance diet as tolerated. General diet, if
Fluids • LR at 1mL/kg/h. Cease IV uids asap. Saline
Mobility • Edge of bed after last set
of post-op VS (usually
6h) with orthostatic VS
Medications • Heparin 5000 units subcu
q8h
Vitals/
Monitoring
• Continue glucose
management
clear liquid lunch, start ibuprofen 600mg po
q6h (consider ketorolac 15mg q6h if opiate
side effects and NPO)
patient has no nausea, no distention, no
belching/hiccups
lock IV uids when oral intake greater than 500
or adequate urine output. Aim for early oral
uid intake
• OOB for all meals. Walk 3–4 times in the
hall—Goal 9 laps. OOB 6h/day
• Start 17g Mirolax 1× daily
• Labs Days 1–4, as clinically indicated

136
Inpatient Milestones: Target Post-op LOS=3–4 Days
Day 0 Day 1
Equipment • Incentive spirometer 10×/h
while awake until
discharge
• Sequential compression
devices on, unless
ambulating until discharge
Support
Services
Day 2 Day 3–4
Pain • Epidural stopped and
oxycodone started after
breakfast tolerated
(epidural pulled 4h later)
Diet • Advance diet as tolerated.
General diet, if patient has
no nausea, no distention,
no belching/hiccups
Fluids
Mobility • OOB for all meals. Walk
3–4 times in the hall—
Goal 18 laps. OOB 6h/
day until discharge
Medications • DC Alvimopan (if bowel movement)
Vitals/
Monitoring
Equipment • JP drain teaching
Support
Services
• DC Foley (just pull)
• PT visit on day 1, latest
• Gabapentin discontinued on day 3
• Do not prescribe Gabapentin at discharge
• Acetaminophen and ibuprofen continued at
discharge
– Unless chronic opioid user (on narcotics
within 1 week of surgery)
• Advance diet as tolerated. General diet, if
patient has no nausea, no distention, no
belching/hiccups
• OOB for all meals. Walk 3–4 times in the
hall—Goal 18 laps. OOB 6h/day until
discharge
• Med rec on day before discharge
A. S. Wright and R. P. Petersen

10 Enhanced Recovery inAbdominal Hernia Repair
Appendix 2: Patient-Friendly Hernia Care Map
137

138
A. S. Wright and R. P. Petersen

10 Enhanced Recovery inAbdominal Hernia Repair
139
References
1. Shah PM, etal. Reducing readmissions while shortening length of stay: the positive impact of
an enhanced recovery protocol in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(2):219–27.
2. Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M.Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg.
2014;38(6):1531–41.
3. Nelson G, Kiyang LN, Chuck A, Thanh NX, Gramlich LM.Cost impact analysis of enhanced
recovery after surgery program implementation in Alberta colon cancer patients. Curr Oncol
Tor Ont. 2016;23(3):e221–7.
4. Thanh NX, etal. An economic evaluation of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)
multisite implementation program for colorectal surgery in Alberta. Can J Surg J Can Chir.
2016;59(6):415–21.
5. Malczak P, Pisarska M, Piotr M, Wysocki M, Budzynski A, Pedziwiatr M.Enhanced recovery
after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):226–35.
6. Melloul E, etal. Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: enhanced recovery after
surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2016;40(10):2425–40.
7. Miralpeix E, etal. A call for new standard of care in perioperative gynecologic oncology
practice: impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. Gynecol Oncol.
2016;141(2):371–8.
8. Macedo FIB, Mittal VK.Does enhanced recovery pathways affect outcomes in open ventral
hernia repair? Hernia. 2017;21(5):817–8.
9. Majumder A, Fayezizadeh M, Neupane R, Elliott HL, Novitsky YW.Benets of multimodal
enhanced recovery pathway in patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg.
2016;222(6):1106–15.
10. Fayezizadeh M, Petro CC, Rosen MJ, Novitsky YW.Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway
for abdominal wall reconstruction: pilot study and preliminary outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2014;134(4 Suppl 2):151S–9S.
11. SAGES SMART Enhanced Recovery Program—ERPs for MIS. SAGES [Online]. https://
www.sages.org/smart-enhanced-recovery-program/. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
12. Schmid M, etal. Impact of smoking on perioperative outcomes after major surgery. Am J Surg.
2015;210(2):221–229.e6.
13. Sorensen LT. Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and
smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2012;147(4):373–83.
14. Sorensen LT, Jorgensen T.Short-term pre-operative smoking cessation intervention does not
affect postoperative complications in colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Colorectal
Dis. 2003;5(4):347–52.
15. Wong J, Lam DP, Abrishami A, Chan MTV, Chung F.Short-term preoperative smoking cessation and postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth.
2012;59(3):268–79.
16. Giordano SA, Garvey PB, Baumann DP, Liu J, Butler CE.The impact of body mass index
on abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes: a comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2017;139(5):1234–44.
17. Sauerland S, Korenkov M, Kleinen T, Arndt M, Paul A.Obesity is a risk factor for recurrence
after incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2004;8(1):42–6.
18. Owei L, Swendiman RA, Kelz RR, Dempsey DT, Dumon KR.Impact of body mass index on
open ventral hernia repair: a retrospective review. Surgery. 2017;162(6):1320–9.
19. Rosen MJ, Aydogdu K, Grafmiller K, Petro CC, Faiman GH, Prabhu A.A multidisciplinary
approach to medical weight loss prior to complex abdominal wall reconstruction: is it feasible?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(8):1399–406.
20. Schiesser M, Kirchhoff P, Müller MK, Schäfer M, Clavien P-A.The correlation of nutrition
risk index, nutrition risk score, and bioimpedance analysis with postoperative complications in
patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Surgery. 2009;145(5):519–26.

140
21. Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z.Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a
new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003;22(3):321–36.
22. Strong for surgery. American College of Surgeons [Online]. https://www.facs.org/quality-pro-
grams/strong-for-surgery. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
23. Evans DC, Martindale RG, Kiraly LN, Jones CM.Nutrition optimization prior to surgery. Nutr
Clin Pract. 2014;29(1):10–21.
24. Probst P, et al. Meta-analysis of immunonutrition in major abdominal surgery. Br J Surg.
2017;104(12):1594–608.
25. Goodenough CJ, etal. Preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin and postoperative glucose together
predict major complications after abdominal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(4):854–861.
e1.
26. Karimian N, Niculiseanu P, Amar-Zifkin A, Carli F, Feldman LS.Association of elevated preoperative hemoglobin A1c and post-operative complications in non-diabetic patients: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2018;42(1):61–72.
27. Feely MA, Collins CS, Daniels PR, Kebede EB, Jatoi A, Mauck KF.Preoperative testing before
noncardiac surgery: guidelines and recommendations. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87(6):414–8.
28. Fleisher LA, etal. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and
management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(22):e77.
29. Tadros RO, etal. Vascular surgeon-hospitalist comanagement improves in-hospital mortality at
the expense of increased in-hospital cost. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(3):819–25.
30. Rohatgi N, Loftus P, Grujic O, Cullen M, Hopkins J, Ahuja N.Surgical comanagement by hospitalists improves patient outcomes: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;264(2):275–82.
31. Gillis C, et al. Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients
undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(5):937–47.
32. Minnella EM, etal. Patients with poor baseline walking capacity are most likely to improve
their functional status with multimodal prehabilitation. Surgery. 2016;160(4):1070–9.
33. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce
the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration.
Anesthesiology. 2017;126(3):376–93.
34. Ljungqvist O.Preoperative fasting and carbohydrate treatment. In: Feldman LS, Delaney
CP, Ljungqvist O, Carli F, editors. The SAGES/ERAS® Society Manual of enhanced recovery programs for gastrointestinal surgery. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015.
p.41–9.
35. Slieker JC, Hahnloser D.Bowel preparation: always, sometimes, never? In: Feldman LS,
Delaney CP, Ljungqvist O, Carli F, editors. The SAGES/ERAS® Society Manual of enhanced
recovery programs for gastrointestinal surgery. Cham: Springer International Publishing;
2015. p.51–9.
36. Barletta JF, Senagore AJ. Reducing the burden of postoperative ileus: evaluating and implementing an evidence-based strategy. World J Surg. 2014;38(8):1966–77.
37. Carli F.The role of the anesthesiologist in reducing surgical stress and improving recovery. In:
Feldman LS, Delaney CP, Ljungqvist O, Carli F, editors. The SAGES/ERAS® Society manual
of enhanced recovery programs for gastrointestinal surgery. Cham: Springer International
Publishing; 2015. p.61–8.
38. Varadhan KK, Lobo DN.A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous uid
therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right. Proc Nutr Soc.
2010;69(4):488–98.
39. Owen R, Gan TJ.Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. In: Feldman LS, Delaney
CP, Ljungqvist O, Carli F, editors. The SAGES/ERAS® Society manual of enhanced recovery programs for gastrointestinal surgery. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015.
p.79–95.
40. Forbes SS, etal. Evidence-based guidelines for prevention of perioperative hypothermia. J Am
Coll Surg. 2009;209(4):492–503.e1.
A. S. Wright and R. P. Petersen

10 Enhanced Recovery inAbdominal Hernia Repair
41. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence
of surgical- wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and
Temperature Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(19):1209–15.
42. Kwon S, Thompson R, Dellinger P, Yanez D, Farrohki E, Flum D.Importance of perioperative
glycemic control in general surgery: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment
Program. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):8–14.
43. Kotagal M, etal. Perioperative hyperglycemia and risk of adverse events among patients with
and without diabetes. Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):97–103.
44. Tan M, Law LS-C, Gan TJ.Optimizing pain management to facilitate enhanced recovery after
surgery pathways. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(2):203–18.
45. Hubner M, Blanc C, Roulin D, Winiker M, Gander S, Demartines N.Randomized clinical trial
on epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an
enhanced recovery pathway. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):648–53.
46. Kim AJ, Yong RJ, Urman RD.The role of transversus abdominis plane blocks in enhanced
recovery after surgery pathways for open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Laparoendosc
Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(9):909–14.
47. Sinha A, Jayaraman L, Punhani D, Chowbey P. Transversus abdominis plane block for pain
relief in patients undergoing in endoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernia: a comparative,
randomised double-blind prospective study. J Minimal Access Surg. 2018;14(3):197–201.
48. Iyer SS, Bavishi H, Mohan CV, Kaur N.Comparison of epidural analgesia with transversus
abdominis plane analgesia for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized study. Anesth Essays Res. 2017;11(3):670–5.
49. Fayezizadeh M, Majumder A, Neupane R, Elliott HL, Novitsky YW.Efcacy of transversus
abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine during open abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2016;212(3):399–405.
50. Hutchins JL, Kesha R, Blanco F, Dunn T, Hochhalter R.Ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine vs. non-liposomal bupivacaine for
postoperative pain control after laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy: a prospective
randomised observer-blinded study. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(8):930–7.
51. Pirrera B, etal. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus thoracic epidural analgesia
(TEA) in laparoscopic colon surgery in the ERAS program. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(1):376–82.
52. Wick EC, Grant MC, Wu CL.Postoperative multimodal analgesia pain management with
nonopioid analgesics and techniques: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(7):691–7.
53. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice
guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology.
2012;116(2):248–73.
54. Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, Memon MA. Early versus traditional postoperative feeding
in patients undergoing resectional gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. JPEN J Parenter
Enteral Nutr. 2011;35(4):473–87.
55. Lassen K, etal. Allowing normal food at will after major upper gastrointestinal surgery does
not increase morbidity: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2008;247(5):721–9.
56. Lau C, Phillips E, Bresee C, Fleshner P.Early use of low residue diet is superior to clear
liquid diet after elective colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg.
2014;260(4):641–7; discussion 647–9.
57. Pashikanti L, Von Ah D. Impact of early mobilization protocol on the medical-surgical inpatient population: an integrated review of literature. Clin Nurse Spec CNS.
2012;26(2):87–94.
58. de Almeida EPM, et al. Early mobilization programme improves functional capacity after major abdominal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth.
2017;119(5):900–7.
59. Zaouter C, Kaneva P, Carli F. Less urinary tract infection by earlier removal of bladder
catheter in surgical patients receiving thoracic epidural analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med.
2009;34(6):542–8.
141
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
