Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5795_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
14
M. Riccabona
1.6.3 Harmonic Imaging (HI)
• Has become widespread and common, using rst harmonic response of resonat­ing reectors instead of original reected echo for creating US image.
• Reduces penetration and needs slightly higher output gain, but HI signicantly reduces noise—as signal for imaging is created by resonating individual struc­ture itself.
• Improves border delineation and differentiation of liquid structures, enhances grey scale differences.
• Commonly used in combination with HR-US/compounding; furthermore essen­tial for contrast-enhanced US (ce-US).
Note Though initially applied mainly to adults in poor scanning conditions (caused
by overlying structures or adjacent gas), HI is now routinely applied in paediatric US, too (Fig.1.5).
Fig. 1.5 Harmonic imaging (HI). (a) Normal grey scale cross-section image of a kidney (+2) with a slightly dilated renal pelvis (+1): somewhat hazy image with poor quality. (b) Same infant and same section as in (a) acquired with HI: more conspicuous image with better delineation of the dilated pelvis and the renal borders; also the cortico-medullary differentiation is accentuated (beware of imaging technique induced articial “pseudonephrocalcinosis”)
1.6.4 Extended Field ofView US
• Also known as panoramic imaging or freestyle US. Adds serial consecutive neighbouring US images into one big overview.
• Based on calculation of transducer motion from picture inherent information— thus two consecutive images can be aligned in proper anatomic order; continu­ous display of even very large structures is achievable (Fig.1.6).
Not only useful for comprehensive overview of gross pathology or anatomy but
also for displaying long/large structures or measuring structures too large for eld
1 US Physics
Fig. 1.6 Extended eld of view US. (a) Measurement of liver length in anterior axillary line: due to large size, this can only be reliably achieved by using “extended eld of view”; additionally a more conspicuous view of the entire organ with the kidney can be achieved. (b) Enlarged urinary bladder sagittal view: conspicuous view and reliable measurement of this megacystis
15
of view of conventional transducers (e.g. large transplant kidney, severe spleno­megaly and huge tumours).
1.6.5 US Texture Analysis
Tries to improve US ability to differentiate and analyse tissue texture.
Still under development, not routinely applied or available on all devices.
• Quality of reective echoes from dedicated/individually dened area is assessed using various algorithms to compare all sonographic attributes, or changes in sound velocity.
• After comparison with normal standardised echotexture or potentially available information from previous scans as well as other healthy organ regions, differ­ences in tissue texture are displayed.
• Potentially improve detection and characterisation of specic tissue areas (“sono-histogram”).
• Similar principle is applied to quantify ow based on CDS information—only offered by some vendors.
• A new application of this approach is the upcoming sonographic liver fat quanti­cation: still under research, but as today no established applications—particu­larly in paediatrics.
1.6.6 Potential Future forOther Modern Paediatric
US Applications
A number of potential applications on horizon: US-guided drug delivery, optic­acoustic imaging, etc.
16
M. Riccabona
Most presently under preclinical research conditions, some starting in human
trials, some introduced to adult scanning:
• Image fusion techniques for diagnostic and interventional procedures—already introduced to adult scanning and intervention, rarely used in kids as more cum­bersome (motion artefacts …).
• Liver fat quantication—recently introduced by some vendors, just being stud­ied in adults. Two main methods reported: controlled attenuation parameter (CAP—based on transient elastography—see Chap. 4) or Acoustic Structure Quantication (ASQ—based on analysis of echo amplitude distribution, also useful for other structural tissue analysis). May hold potential in obese children/ adolescents, or children with other metabolic conditions, too. Other approaches usually based on speed of sound estimation, backscatter coefcient and attenua­tion parameters.
• US-guided drug delivery: UCA is used as carrier for attached drugs. Arrival of drug-loaded UCA at desired location is detectable by ce-US, then high-energy sound pulse is activated to destroy UCA/carrier molecule, thus deliver drug locally to targeted area—reducing systemic drug interactions/adverse advents.
– Foreseen for oncology but also potential for any other focal disease (e.g.
inammatory).
• Opto-acoustic imaging, US thrombolysis, etc., many future applications on hori­zon but beyond scope of booklet.

US Methods, Artefacts, Biologic Effects, Practice

MichaelRiccabona

2.1 A (Amplitude)-Mode

Oldest US technique, still used today in ophthalmology (for measuring various small structures of eye).
Technique Emitted US impulse reected at major interfaces, signal received dur-
ing transmission break. Graph illustrates travel duration of US beam on x-axis and intensity of reected echoes as amplitude spikes on y-axis (Fig.2.1).

2.2 (T)M-Mode (Time-Motion-Mode)

2
Used to show positional changes of reecting interfaces over time.
Principle On x-axis of monitor graph, changes in position of individual image pix-
els displayed; change in intensity of reected echo is encoded by variation in bright­ness, whereas time is encoded on y-axis.
Method frequently used in echocardiography and in some dedicated applica-
tions, e.g. for assessment of peristalsis or motion (e.g. ureteral peristalsis, diaphrag­matic motion) (Fig.2.1c).
M. Riccabona (*) Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Medical University Graz and University Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria e-mail: michael.riccabona@medunigraz.at
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 M. Riccabona (ed.), Pediatric Ultrasound,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47910-7_2
17
18
Fig. 2.1 US modes. (a) A (amplitude)-Mode—oldest US technique: US signals emitted along single line, amplitude of reected echo encodes spike height on y-axis, whereas depth of origin of reection from individual structures encoded on x-axis (time between emission and receive). (b) B (brightness)-Mode: transducer emits sound waves; the reected echoes are received. Energy of echo encodes brightness of respective pixel on monitor; position of respective pixel calculated from individual travel time (i.e. time between sound emission and receiving, with known sound speed in tissue). (c) M (motion)-Mode: US image (of a prominent ureter, cross section through bladder) shows a dotted line dening the section where changes (i.e. motion, in this case ureteral peristalsis) over time are displayed as graph in lower part of image (blue). Originally this was applied in echocardiography without orienting B-Mode image, just displaying the lower graph to analyse heart wall or valve movements
M. Riccabona

2.3 B (Brightness)-Mode

The commonly used real-time US imaging technique (Fig.2.1b).
Technique Transmitted US waves reected when encountering various interfaces:
• Brightness of individual image pixels dened by intensity of reected echoes (the stronger the echo, the brighter the corresponding pixel).
• Position of pixels dened by direction of transmitted beam inducing individual echo (encoded on x-axis) and time between sending and receiving (depth, encoded on y-axis).
• All reected echoes displayed on monitor correspond to travel time within pre­dened beam direction—calculated sectional image.
• Repetitive frequent updates of such sectional images create movie-like impres­sion enabling what is called “real-time US”.
2 US Methods, Artefacts, Biologic Eects, Practice
Fig. 2.2 Doppler US. (a) Doppler scheme: US signal emitted; frequency shift of received echo mea- sured, thus ow velocity and ow direction can be calculated using Doppler equation; for correct velocity estimation, angle between incoming US signal and movement direction of reecting particle (i.e. mostly erythrocytes) must be measured. (b) Doppler display: besides audio signal typically Doppler information displayed as ow graph after spectral analysis using Fourier transformation. All velocities throughout spectrum are displayed at any time (of cardiac circle), with intensity encoding number of reectors at the individual velocity. Y-axis encodes ow velocity; x-axis encodes time
19

2.4 Doppler Sonography

If sound reected by moving interface, frequency of reected wave shifted (Doppler effect).
• Frequency shift depends on angle between sound beam direction and direction of motion, as well as velocity of moving particle/interface; shift dened by Doppler calculation (Fig.2.2a).
• Frequency shift of received echoes can be measured; thus ow direction and ow velocity can be calculated and displayed in various ways (Fig.2.2b—also see Chap. 3)

2.5 Artefacts

2.5.1 General Remarks
Artefacts caused by phenomena that interfere with image formation and cannot be sufciently corrected:
• Impair image (e.g. bowing artefacts, reection artefacts).
• Can also be diagnostically valuable (e.g. posterior enhancement/through trans­mission for identication of liquids, posterior shadowing for identication of calcications).
• Knowledge of artefacts essential for proper image interpretation.
20
M. Riccabona
2.5.2 Common Artefacts
2.5.2.1 Side Loop Artefact
Transducer does not only emit central beam but also side loops—can produce sig­nicant echoes when reected by strong interfaces. Some of these echoes reected into direction of central beam and received by transducer—these echoes appear projected into main beam, get used for image calculation, although deriving from structures out of main beam direction.
Only cause image impairment when encountering highly reective surface;
respective echoes are displayed as if arisen from central beam (wrong position), usually only recognisable when occurring in uid-lled or low-echogenicity structure.
• Typical example: adjacent bowel gas surface alters image of gall bladder mim­icking sludge.
• Can be identied by change of transducer position (e.g. tilt transducer).
• Can usually be eliminated by repositioning transducer and reducing gain, alter­ing angulation, etc.
2.5.2.2 Bowing Artefact
Arise by wrong projection of reected echoes into anatomic incorrect position.
Caused by oblique reections of beam—reected echo received by “wrong”
crystal, position wrongly assigned for further processing.
• Can usually be eliminated and identied by tilting of transducer.
2.5.2.3 Noise
Definition
Signal-like monitor appearance throughout image is created by electronic process­ing and amplication. Background noise is increasingly amplied with reduced sig­nal strength (e.g. TGC adaptation or high-receive gain). Near limits of penetration: differentiation between noise and real signals may become impossible.
Depending on gain settings, noise can also create articial echoes within anechoic
lesions such as uid or cysts, making differentiation difcult or impossible—par­ticularly when small.
• For differentiation/identication: change focus position, output gain and trans­ducer frequency.
• Modern devices all offer some sort of noise ltering, which can be set to various intensities.
2.5.2.4 Marginal Shadowing
Created by spherical structures with clear limit that exhibit signicant acoustic impedance interval at its lateral borders—appears as line-like sound mitigation at lateral borders behind object.
2 US Methods, Artefacts, Biologic Eects, Practice
21
Physical cause—tangential impact of sound beam, additional scattering and
reection at lateral wall—then transmitted into deeper image sections.
• Helpful for identication of cysts and tubular structures but may be mistaken for acoustic shadowing from small concretions, e.g. in gall bladder or kidneys (Fig.2.3).
2.5.2.5 Posterior Enhancement—Increased through Transmission
When sound passes through completely uid-lled anechoic structure (or other structure with little sound attenuation), intensity of US beam is not altered by absorption and reection: causes different echo intensity of area deep to such uid­lled structures compared to adjacent area of same depth where US beam has been more attenuated by intervening tissue.
TGC correction articially adapts for intensity drop by depth—areas behind
uid displayed more echoic than surrounding structures.
• Helpful to identify uid/uid-lled structures.
Note In order to properly assess tissue behind large uid-lled structures, adapta-
tion of TGC correction to account for this phenomenon is essential (Fig.2.4).
Fig. 2.3 Artefact—marginal shadowing, reverberations. Articial anechoic lines originating from margins of venous sinus in this axial liver view not corresponding to any specic anatomic or pathologic ndings. Note echoic spots with reverberations within liver indicating intrahepatic air/gas
Fig. 2.4 Artefact—through transmission. Articially increased echogenicity behind uid-lled bowel structure due to increase through transmission but deteriorating differentiation of respective structures (i.e. gastric duplication cyst)
22
M. Riccabona
2.5.2.6 Reverberation Artefact
Definition
Multiple reections of sound travelling between two parallel layers with strong acoustic interfaces create repeated parallel echogenic lines that usually get weaker with depth:
• Typically observed parallel to transducer at supercial layers (e.g. skin).
• Can be reduced by altering focus and decreasing (output) gain.
Ring-down artefact” caused by resonance from gas;
Short ring-down artefacts called comet tail artefact—special form of reverbera-
tion phenomenon, usually appears behind gas/air-lled structures.
Reverberations most prominently seen with air interface—in lung ultrasound
also known as “A-lines”.
• Created by scattering and reection of incoming sound beam with irregular reections and noise behind sonographically non-penetrable surface (Fig.2.5).
2.5.2.7 Increment or Slice Thickness/Beam Width Artefact
Sound beam dimensions vary depending on kind of transducer, frequency and focus settings. Depending on relation of beam width with distance between solid and liquid structures, particularly at curved interfaces, small layer of low-degree echoes may appear. May mimic doubled/hazy wall structure, can be mistaken for sludge within uid. A sort of partial volume phenomenon.
• Can usually be eliminated by optimising focus setting and changing transducer or frequency.
Fig. 2.5 Artefact—reverberation/comet tail artefact and dorsal shadowing. Chest wall US: echogenic reverberations caused by aerated lung surface () and dorsal shadowing () caused by ossied rib
2 US Methods, Artefacts, Biologic Eects, Practice
Fig. 2.6 Mirror image artefact. The echogenic border of skull bone causes mirroring of subcutaneous extracranial collection into subcalvarian intracranial compartment, mimicking a non- existing intracranial collection. Note: artefacts from malattachment of transducer to bowed skin surface in upper right corner of image
23
2.5.2.8 Mirror Image Artefact
Strong reecting interface (mostly gas—i.e. air at lung base) met by sound beam in an angle around 45°—acts as acoustic mirror: articial mirror images observed behind reecting border due to prolonged travel duration of incoming signal (Fig.2.6).
• Also encountered on colour Doppler sonography (CDS), may be quite confusing.
• Can be identied by changing transducer position/tilting transducer.
2.5.2.9 Shadowing
If sound cannot penetrate and does not cause reverberations—area behind does not produce any echoes; i.e. it looks black like a shadow (see Fig.2.6).
• Useful for identifying stones, bones and other calcied structures—hinders assessment of area behind.
Note This artefact is signicantly reduced when applying Image Compounding
(see Fig. 1.4), and enhanced by Harmonic Imaging. May lead to misinterpretation!
2.5.2.10 Refraction Artefact
Occurs when sound passes obliquely through an interface between tissues with sig­nicantly varying sound speed—thus refraction occurs (mostly solid/uid inter­faces or border between low- and high-echogenicity tissues).
• Can cause duplication artefacts (duplicating structures)—also affects length measurements (e.g. kidney) (Fig.2.7).
• Refractive shadowing (see above—marginal shadowing artefact) caused by defocusing and variations in beam energy or intensity at edge of uid-lled structures.
• Can usually be eliminated by changing transducer position.