Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5795_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
13 Upper Abdominal US inNeonates, Infants andChildren: (Excluding the Kidneys)
279
Wilson Disease
Copper storage disorder, leads to haemolytic events and early liver insufciency with relatively unspecic liver changes. Additional neurologic symptoms. US non­specic in early stage, then increased size and echogenicity; cirrhosis develops in later stages.
α1-Antitrypsin Deficiency
Most common cause of “hepatitis syndrome” in infancy. US in early phases non­specic, potentially some enlargement+homogenous alteration of texture similar to hepatitis. Course/severity varies, eventually may lead to liver cirrhosis (Fig.13.9a).
Haemosiderosis
Iron deposit in liver—either idiopathic or secondary to various systemic/haemolytic conditions. US nonspecic: enlargement, in early phase, smooth surface and rounded lower margin with increased echogenicity. Over time more nodular paren­chymal aspect develops. The further course depends on severity and management of underlying condition.
Note Specic MR techniques and programmes using susceptibility phenomena on
T2-star-weighted sequences allow (semi-)quantitative assessment of iron content— reliable monitoring during therapy and follow-up.
Role ofUS
Most commonly used imaging modality for diagnosis and follow-up of liver conditions.
• Particularly CDS, ce-US and complementary dynamic sectional imaging (most
commonly MRI) can be helpful—particularly for focal disease.
• Increasingly US elastography also applied to children with liver disease: elevated
maximum shear wave velocities and high stiffness (e.g. above 18.8—2m/s, but
normal values depend on transducer and device) seem to be indicative for brotic/
cirrhotic changes.
• Depending on query (M)ERCP may be indicated in conditions affecting the bili-
ary system.
13.3.4.4 Portal Hypertension andVascular Problems
Portal Hypertension
Definition
Increasing liver resistance with increase of PV pressure above 10 mmHg. Most common and important vascular liver disease. Pressure measurement not feasible by US, but indirect signs on grey scale and CDS/spectral analysis enable reliable assessment in diagnosis and follow-up of suspected portal hypertension. Details of underlying conditions are in their respective sections.
280
M. Riccabona
Causes typically placed into three broad categories:
• Prehepatic: portal vein obstruction/occlusion/thrombosis/stenosis.
• Intrahepatic/intra-sinusoidal: parenchymal disease with increased resistance of
the peripheral sinusoid vascular bed (some also place peripheral intrahepatic PV
impairment in this group).
• Posthepatic: HV problems, increased intrathoracic/right atrial pressure.
US Criteria
Findings of underlying condition (e.g. liver brosis/cirrhosis, hepatomegaly, peri­portal brosis).
• Commonly hilar PV tapering: enlargement of prehepatic portion, narrower intra-
hepatic portion, except for prehepatic origin.
• Secondary splenomegaly with tortuous vessels at splenic hilus.
• Portosystemic anastomoses: splenorenal, splenogastric, from spleen to abdomi-
nal and thoracic wall to diaphragmatic vessels/gastric veins with secondary
oesophageal varices, recanalisation of umbilical vein, collateral vessels from
liver hilus to gastric veins, etc. Secondary dilatation of draining venous vascular
system with formation of anastomotic venous networks (abdominal wall around
the umbilicus—“caput medusa”, inferior mesenteric anastomoses to rectoanal
veins with haemorrhoids, tubular enlarged mesenteric veins with congestive
changes of mesentery and bowel wall), secondary ascites.
• PV thrombosis may be primary and causative or secondary to reduced portal ow.
• Secondary cavernous transformation with development of veins in PV wall (mul-
tiple tubular tortuous small lumen veins at liver hilus without visualisation of
normal PV).Flow usually insufcient to prevent portal hypertension. May recon-
stitute normal appearing intrahepatic PV.
Doppler Criteria
• HV: veins difcult to nd (CDS helpful), reduced undulation—potentially band-
like ow spectrum. Often reduced ow, slow velocity.
• PV: initially increased undulation, then loss of undulation of PV ow. Reduced ow
velocities, eventually bidirectional or hepatofugal inverted ow direction (Fig.13.10).
• HA: secondary to reduced PV ow, arterial liver perfusion increases. HA
becomes larger, very pulsatile, with high (particularly systolic) velocities.
US Depiction of Portal Systemic Shunts
• CDS may directly visualise abnormal venous pathways (e.g. recanalised umbili-
cal vein, varices at gastrooesophageal junction, splenorenal shunts, inverted ow
in superior mesenteric vein).
• If no collaterals are seen, ow volume measurements of PV, splenic+superior
mesenteric vein may be helpful (indirect sign): PV-volume ow should be equal
or higher than sum of volume ow of splenic vein+superior mesenteric vein—
otherwise there must be some shunt somewhere.
13 Upper Abdominal US inNeonates, Infants andChildren: (Excluding the Kidneys)
Fig. 13.10 Portal hypertension: (a) Inverted hepatofugal ow in central portal vein encoded in blue (next to red encoded HA) due to portal hypertension with intrahepatic block. (b) Duplex ow analysis conrms the inverted direction of portal venous ow. (c) CDS demonstrates lack of ow in central portal vein due to extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis in a patient after liver transplantation
281
Note These measurements are cumbersome in small children, heavily rely on good
angle correction at reasonable Doppler angles as well as accurate cross-sectional assessment of vessel diameter. Due to underlying equation even mild errors in ves­sel area/diameter measurements cause enormous changes in calculated volume ow (see chapter on Doppler US).
In portal vein thrombosis/prehepatic block: lack of visualisation of PV ow (Fig.13.10c)—recanalisation or cavernous transformation can also be assessed.
Note Thrombi can reach into splenic or superior mesenteric vein—these vessels
always need to be assessed for patency or involvement.
Vascular Malformations
Intrahepatic vascular malformations or other pathology are rare, but many normal variants, particularly of origin and number of hepatic arteries.
May be idiopathic/congenital, secondary after trauma/surgery/transplantation, in/after inammation (e.g. mycotic or inammatory aneurysm), or connected with systemic vascular disease (Kawasaki, ADPKD Type I, bromuscular dyspla­sia, etc.).
• Arteriovenous/arterioportal shunts/stula: vary in size, (multi)focal or even dif-
fusely generalised; depictable as cyst-like lesion on grey scale, eventually identi-
ed as such by CDS.
• Postoperative or posttraumatic stula: usually only depicted on CDS, shunt ow
assessed by spectral analysis of feeding and draining vessel(s).
• Aneurysms: ectatic cyst-like vessel changes—use CDS, turbulent ow, alternat-
ing bidirectional ow jet, may (partially) thrombose (Fig.13.11c, d).
• Vessel malformations such as aberrant drainage of pulmonary veins (e.g. Scimitar
syndrome) or combined with cardiac malformations—ow vessels from origin
to drainage point.
282
Fig. 13.11 Posttraumatic AVF in liver, other vascular liver malformations: (a) CDS reveals high- velocity turbulent ow in a posttraumatic arteriovenous stula. (b) Duplex trace analysis conrms low resistance arterial ow in the feeding artery and arterialised ow in draining vein. (c) Portal vein aneu- rysm after liver transplantation at site of anastomosis. (d) CDS reveals turbulent ow in the aneurysm
M. Riccabona
• Haemangioma/haemoendothelioma etc.: vascular malformations—see below
under liver tumours.
US and CDS Findings
Depend on entity and size (Fig.13.11).
In shunts, CDS may enable depiction of arteriovenous stula and visualise hyperperfusion of feeding vessel with secondary arterialisation of draining vein (PV, HV) (Fig.13.11a, b). PV shunts rare and difcult to nd.
Portal Vein andHepatic Artery Stenosis
Extremely rare in childhood, same conditions and features/criteria as in other ves­sels apply. More common after transplantation or surgery.
US and CDS Findings
• Change in diameter.
• Regional ow turbulence with aliasing.
• Pre- and poststenotic ow pattern alteration with delayed systolic upstroke, long
acceleration time (pulsus tardus et parvus).
• Turbulent diastolic ow.
• Turbulence and increased velocity at site of stenosis, etc.
Note All ndings depend on severity and grade of stenosis.
Congenital Agenesis or Variants ofPortal Vein/Congenital Portocaval Anastomosis/Abernethy Malformations
Variety of conditions, extremely rare—lead to liver failure/brosis.
US and CDS Findings
• Non-visualisation of portal vein (Fig.13.12).
– Anomalous vessels connecting splanchnic veins to central circulation. – Resultant arterial hyperperfusion to compensate for lack of PV perfusion. – Often develop FNH and/or adenomas, may have malignant course.
13 Upper Abdominal US inNeonates, Infants andChildren: (Excluding the Kidneys)
Fig. 13.12 Abernethy malformation: (a) Huge nodular liver structural alteration (++) in a 9-year- old girl with Abernethy malformation—likely to present an FNH. (b) CDS of liver hilus vessels demonstrates lack of a normal portal vein entering the liver. The splenic and mesenteric veins drain into an unusual venous connection to the inferior vena cava (coded in blue). The more orange coded vessel is the reactively enlarged hepatic artery
283
Hepatic Vein Thrombosis/Occlusion/Stenosis
Summarises variety of conditions, most typical ones:
Budd–Chiari Syndrome
Large veins obstructed/occluded by space-occupying lesion compressing the vessel or by thrombosis.
Veno-Occlusive Disease (VOD)
New name=Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome: affects small peripheral portions— obstruction and thrombosis/brosis of small sinusoidal venules after necrosis of hepatocytes due to sinusoidal injury/disease. Typically a complication after chemo­therapy or radiation for bone marrow transplantation, particularly after Wilms’ tumour. Peripheral disease, thus only depictable by indirect US signs.
Increased Right Atrial/Intrathoracic Pressure.
Secondary to cardiothoracic conditions.
Note The loss of typical HV ow modulation is very sensitive for veno-occlusive
disease, but not specic. Any other cause that either increases hepatic resistance and stiffness or elevates right atrial pressure will cause similar phenomena. However, HV spectral analysis helpful for follow-up to document improvement and recovery by demonstrating increasingly normal ow patterns during treatment.
Portosystemic Shunts
Secondary to portal hypertension or vascular malformation/anomaly (see above). Surgically introduced shunts—for treatment of portal hypertension, including TIPS.
CDS used to assess patency of shunts; spectral analysis after proper angle correc­tion allows quantication; helpful for follow-up and reveals complications such as occlusion, thrombosis or stenosis.
284
M. Riccabona
Persistent ductus venosus also causes shunting between the left PV and systemic venous circulation.
• Shunt direction and ow velocity can be measured (see Fig.13.2a, b). A persist-
ing venous duct is usually sign for underlying liver disease and rarely a vascular
problem itself.
13.3.4.5 Liver Trauma
Liver laceration or contusion is relatively common in paediatric blunt abdominal trauma. However, early after trauma, even severe injuries are easily missed by US due to similar echogenicity of fresh blood and liver parenchyma—follow-up after 12–24h is essential, or the use of UCA.
Therapy and prognosis as well as risk of complications depend on grade, thus also US should try to establish a grading (Table13.4).
US after intravenous UCA administration signicantly improves US potential to diagnose injuries early, with similar sensitivity as CT and may even visualise active bleeding (BUT: at present UCA in paediatrics off-label).
Table 13.4 Liver injury grading system
Grade I
Haematoma: Subcapsular, <10% surface area Laceration: Capsular tear, <1cm depth
Grade II
Haematoma: Subcapsular, 10–50% surface area Haematoma: Intraparenchymal, <10cm diameter Laceration: Capsular tear, 1–3cm depth, <10cm length
Grade III
Haematoma: Subcapsular, >50% surface area or
ruptured with active bleeding Haematoma: Intraparenchymal, >10cm diameter Laceration: Capsular tear, >3cm depth
Grade IV
Haematoma: Ruptured intraparenchymal with active
bleeding Laceration: Parenchymal disruption involving 25–75%
hepatic lobes or 1–3 Couinaud segments (within one lobe)
Grade V
Laceration: Parenchymal disruption involving >75%
hepatic lobe >3 Couinaud segments (within one lobe) Vascular: Juxtahepatic venous injuries (IVC, major
hepatic vein)
Grade VI
Vascular, hepatic avulsion
Adapted from American Association for Surgery of Trauma
13 Upper Abdominal US inNeonates, Infants andChildren: (Excluding the Kidneys)
285
Liver Haematoma
Simple haematoma or subcapsular haemorrhage is usually less threatening, may become more serious if liver capsule is ruptured and signicant free peritoneal uid seen (potentially with more or less sedimentation depending on time of investigation).
Note Free peritoneal uid/blood appearing like complicated ascites can be found
anywhere in abdomen and does not necessarily correlate with site of injury, as uid redistributes depending on positioning and other phenomena.
US Findings
Initially same echogenicity as liver parenchyma, potentially disruption of other structures such as vessels or outer contour can aid diagnosis (Fig.13.13a). Thereafter appear hyperechoic, eventually turns hypoechoic with more or less complex appear­ance. Persisting hypoechoic posttraumatic lesions indicate seroma/cyst or even biloma (the latter particularly when growing) (Fig.13.13d).
• CEUS can be helpful in equivocal situations.
Contusion
More difcult to diagnose, often triangular in shape, located in subcapsular.
a
b
c
de
Fig. 13.13 Liver trauma: (a) Large subcapsular liver haematoma (++), reactive ascites and pleu- ral effusion. (b) Liver laceration—initial baseline US scan. (c) ce-US (CEUS) (same patient as in b) clearly delineates the liver laceration in early phase. (d) Cystic transformation of old liver hae­matoma (seroma—difcult to differentiate from biloma). (e) CEUS for liver trauma using a dual image (left side grey scale mode, right contrast mode): grey scale rather poorly shows the huge defect (left image) nicely outlined by CEUS (right image)
286
M. Riccabona
US and CDS Findings
Initially difcult to see, echogenicity changes from hyperechoic to hypoechoic.
(a)CDS may improve detection of contusions by focal disruption of normal vas-
cular architecture with regional rarefaction of vessel colour signals.
Laceration
Definition
Disruption of liver parenchyma and capsule.
US Findings
Discontinuity of contour may be primary nding—despicable even in early stages.
• ce-US (CEUS) will aid early diagnosis (Fig. 13.13b, c, e). Often appears hypoechoic, whereas surrounding tissue inhomogenously patchy, with more or less echogenic areas. Local haematoma will coexist (see above).
Note Pay particular attention to involvement of major structures such as major bile
ducts, central PV or involvement of HVs (may develop occlusion and thrombosis causing necrosis of respective liver segment). If extrahepatic hypoechoic collections persist after liver trauma, consider bile leakage and biloma.
Haemobilia
Haemorrhage into bile ducts—sludge-like echoes in bile ducts/gall bladder.
Associated Diaphragmatic Injury
Rarely diaphragm can be involved. Detectable commonly just by reactive palsy with high position of upper liver border+subphrenic haematoma+reactive pleural effu­sion (common).
If diaphragm ruptured, US may be able to demonstrate herniation of liver or
haematoma into thorax.
Reliable assessment of integrity and continuity of entire diaphragm is impos-
Note
sible by US, particularly on left side.
Liver Infarction
Rare traumatic nding due to dual blood supply, more common after transplantation or surgery and more common in HA than PV, usually branch occlusion. Potentially also more diffuse after severe shock with diffuse hypoperfusion and hypooxygen­ation of liver. Other rare causes are systemic vascular or haemolytic disease.
US and CDS Findings
• Typically wedge shaped, round to oval hypoechoic area with indistinct margins and peripheral distribution reaching to subcapsular area. Secondary necrosis with cystic structures or even hyperechoic foci representing gas, secondary cal­cication and bile lakes. CDS—lack of perfusion in affected vessel.
• CEUS may be helpful.
13 Upper Abdominal US inNeonates, Infants andChildren: (Excluding the Kidneys)
287
Role ofUS inLiver Trauma
First imaging modality in moderate blunt abdominal trauma—need to perform more than just FAST (“focused abdominal US for trauma”, as performed in emergency room for detection of free uid). Detailed study in any stable patient can help to reduce need for (or for tailoring) CT.US follow-up after 6–24h is essential. CEUS improves lesion detection, particularly in early phase (see Fig.13.13).
Note Ce-CT is mandatory (after FAST) in severe and multiple trauma—US may additionally miss signicant injuries of retroperitoneal structures, bowel and spine, as well as chest involvement; US ndings may serve as indicator injury.
Additional Imaging
• Acute setting/severe and multiple trauma: Ce-trauma-CT mandatory.
• For assessing equivocal lesions in stable patient/follow-up: dynamic ce-CT increas­ingly replaced by ce-MR for radiation protection; consider CEUS if available.
• Abdominal plain lm—no utility.
• Chest lm—usually performed in multiple trauma in ER.
13.3.4.6 Space-Occupying Liver Lesions
Simple Cysts
Commonly congenital, usually an incidental nding, rarely asymptomatic.
Other causes: posttraumatic, after (displaced) umbilical vein catheter, after
abscess, after surgery, bile leakage and biloma, infectious, biliary malformations/ cysts, cystic/necrotic part of tumour.
US Findings
Anechoic uid, spherical, thin and smooth wall, no parenchymal nodules (Fig.13.14).
Note As soon as there are septae, parenchymal areas or thick wall-like membranes,
other entities such as abscesses, hydatid cyst, epidermoid cyst (potentially with complex content) must be considered (see Fig.13.15).
Fig. 13.14 Cystic liver lesions. Huge, but otherwise simple liver cyst
288
bc
a
M. Riccabona
d
Fig. 13.15 Complicated liver cysts: (a) Complicated liver cyst with sedimentation—probably post- traumatic. (b) Complicated liver cyst after a liver abscess. (c) Complicated liver cyst with split wall and septations—a hydatid cyst. (d) Complex cystiform lesion (++) after surgery that proved to be a biloma. (e) Large polycystic liver haematoma imaged using panoramic imaging—on imaging some­times indistinguishable from any other complicated “cystic” mass—with corresponding ce-CT image
e
Complicated Cysts
Different causes, postinfectious/posttraumatic/postsurgical or hematogenous/ ascending inammatory disease and cystic tumours.
US and CDS Findings
Similar to simple cysts, but additionally oating echoes, septae, thick wall or paren­chymal nodules (Fig. 13.15). Need at least follow-up or additional diagnostic efforts. Sometimes resected/punctured, particularly in suspicion of tumour or for (sclerosing) therapy.
CDS may nd vascularisation of wall, septae or parenchymal nodules.
Liver Calcifications
Variety of causes such as after haemorrhage, abscess, bile duct concretion, cholan­gitis, Caroli syndrome, cystic brosis, inammatory (viral, particularly foetal infec­tions) and meconium peritonitis (capsular calcications). US usually cannot dene aetiology.
US and CDS Findings
• Echogenic spots of varying size with dorsal shadowing, depending on amount of calcium/size (Fig.13.16).