Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5795_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
258
bc
M. Riccabona
a
de
Fig. 12.19 PAE and pulmonary perfusion decit: (a) Axial view, infant after Glen procedure— with peripheral pneumonia-like oedematous lung. (b) Same child as in (a): note severe postopera­tive perfusion decit of one lung. (c) Axial view through liver: Large infarction, no air sonobronchogram as would be seen with infection. (d) Dorsal scan through intercostals space: triangular subpleural pneumonia-like lung area, typical for infarction induced pneumonia. (e) CDS demonstrates lack of perfusion in the peripheral triangular subpleural consolidation
Fig. 12.20 Lung tumour. Axial view: chest lled with partially cystic tumour that turned out to be a pulmonary blastoma
• Pneumonia, atelectasis: CDS helpful for showing normal vascular supply allow-
ing differentiation from infarction or depiction of necrotic area before typical abscess formations manifest.
• Supercial/pleural/soft tissue arteriovenous malformation: CDS irreplaceable for diagnosis.
DDx Any other cause of non-aerated lung, particularly CCAM, sequestration,
pneumonia, abscess, complicated cysts and hernia:
• In medial/mediastinal aspect: thymus versus lymphoma, etc.
• Extremely rare intrathoracic kidney (normal kidney in atypical location): – Typical renal vascularisation pattern—undisputable diagnosis.
12 Ultrasound oftheChest
259
12.7 Other Miscellaneous andRare Applications
Many more partially rare applications reported: Most relevant ones listed.
12.7.1 US forInterstitial Lung Disease/
Alveolar-Interstitial Syndrome
Increased extravascular lung water, but also thickened interstitium creates “B-line” on lung US; however, a few B-lines can be found in a healthy popula­tion—particularly in newborn and infants (due to physiologic immature lung histology):
• B-lines are vertical, sharply dened hyperechoic lines and structures without
decrease in brightness with depth (ring-down artefact) (Fig.12.21).
• Low-frequency convex transducer detects more B-lines than high-frequency lin-
ear transducers; other settings such as compounding or harmonic imaging also affect appearance of B-lines.
• Multiple B-lines suggest (alveolo-)interstitial lung syndrome (Fig.12.21a).
• Non-specic in terms of aetiology—wide variety of conditions (pulmonary
oedema, ARDS, pulmonary contusion, pneumonia, pulmonary brosis, etc.) (Fig.12.21b–d).
• B-lines correlate with CT abnormalities (e.g. thickened interlobular septa and
ground-glass opacities—closely packed B-lines).
Note Differentiate those appearances from other pathology such as pneumonia,
atelectasis or effusion/empyema (Fig.12.21f, g), and search for possible transition zones with a (double) lung point (Fig.12.21e). Remember that those ndings may be unspecic, but often very valuable in conjunction with clinical information and symptoms.

12.8 Additional Imaging

Plain lm, CT, sometimes (and increasingly) MRI:
• Rarely angiography (vascular malformations) or uoroscopy.
• Role/value of US exquisite for follow-up of effusions or diaphragmatic palsy: – Image-guided interventions: diagnostic or therapeutic puncture (in effusions,
abscess, chylothorax, haematothorax, tumour biopsy, etc.).
Note US has limitations in the chest—complementary imaging tool. Plain lm
often initially compulsory or more easily available and reliable. But for some situa­tions and queries US has become the primary imaging tool and has reduced number
260
M. Riccabona
a
c
d
b
gef
Fig. 12.21 Different B-line appearance in different scenarios: (a) Grouped B-lines in dystelecta- sis/alveolo-interstitial syndrome. (b) More bulky appearance in a child after aspiration. (c) Diffuse and inhomogeneous B-lines in a baby with RSV bronchiolitis—with some mild effusion. (d) Homogenous packed B-lines in secondary RDS (“white lung”). Note the difference to other pathology, e.g. to A-lines with a stratosphere (or barcode) sign on M-mode in pneumothorax— with an obvious lung point at transition to ventilated lung (arrow) (e), an atelectatic consolidation with airsonobronchogram (f), or a neonatal pneumonia with complicated effusion (g)
of lms in follow-up helping to reduce overall radiation burden to paediatric population.
US often used for work-up of in equivocal ndings and may help tailor further
imaging, decide on method or modify protocol (e.g. white hemithorax) (Fig.12.22).
Include assessment of lung base in upper abdominal US and FAST
examinations.
12 Ultrasound oftheChest
261
Fig. 12.22 Case examples where US was helpful to further dene the cause of equivocal chest lm ndings: White hemithorax on chest lm (a). US reveals a partially atelectatic, partially pneu­monic lung with elevated position of the diaphragm (b). The pulmonary vessels are well perfused on CDS, no sign of tumour, only slight effusion. (c) Atypical opacication of right lower lung on plain lm: (d) US demonstrates collapsed lung with secondary pneumonic changes in a child after aspiration
Upper Abdominal US inNeonates, Infants andChildren: (Excluding the
13
Kidneys)
MichaelRiccabona

13.1 Introduction

Liver, bile system, spleen and pancreas are common queries in paediatric US.Age­dependent differences in appearance and size need to be noticed, also different queries than encountered in adults.
13.2 Requisites andInvestigation
13.2.1 Preparation
Fasting helpful for sufcient lling of gall bladder and bile duct assessment, as well as for assessing splanchnic perfusion in a standardised fashion.
Additional provocation by feeding during investigation helpful to enhance visu­alisation of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts and allows for assessment of gall bladder emptying.
For quantitative assessment of liver perfusion (portal vein velocity and hepatic artery ow—e.g. query portal hypertension) child must be fasted to avoid ow alter­ations from increased splanchnic activity and ow mimicking pathology or masking disease.
Tip Fasted means no food, no drink, no chewing gum, no sweets, no smoking, etc.
M. Riccabona (*) Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Medical University Graz and University Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria e-mail: michael.riccabona@medunigraz.at
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 M. Riccabona (ed.), Pediatric Ultrasound,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47910-7_13
263
264
M. Riccabona
13.2.2 Positioning
Conventionally supine position.
• In small children positioning manoeuvres difcult.
• Potentially intercostal access necessary.
• Manoeuvres can be attempted, instructing child “to show a big tummy” or “take
a deep breath and hold it like you were diving” or similar child-adapted wording,
sometimes mandatory to depict or differentiate ndings (e.g. gallstones, etc.).
13.2.3 Transducers
Usually curved arrays of age-adapted frequencies used, but may not work well for inter­costal access (children do not like pressure on ribs)—for these applications and some­times assessing deeper compartments or subdiaphragmatic areas, sector array helpful.
Linear transducers recommended for assessing liver surface and details of paren­chymal structure as well as common bile duct and gall bladder wall; furthermore, in small children or infants these can be used as primary transducers. High-resolution linear arrays (potentially using trapezoid format) recommended in neonates and infants.
Frequency range depends on age and size (18–2MHz).
Harmonic imaging, image compounding, speckle reduction and other sophisti­cated post-processing options helpful. Thorough study always includes colour and spectral Doppler analysis; aCDS less useful in liver or pancreas.
Note For improving lesion detection and characterisation, intravenous US
particularly helpful—although currently no UCA registered for paediatric use in Europe (only in USA approved for paediatric liver applications).

13.3 Liver

13.3.1 Course ofInvestigation
Liver usually assessed from ventral and lateral, rarely dorsal approach necessary or helpful. Systematically sweep through entire liver in sagittal, axial and oblique sec­tions. Follow course of major structures (portal vein, liver veins), assess gall bladder and eventually add Doppler if indicated.
Small children do not respond to positioning commands—use respiration or asking them to “take deep breath” may enable assessment, particularly of subdiaphragmatic areas.
13.3.2 Standard Planes
• Sagittal section in sternal line (STL), left and right in middle clavicular line (MCL)
and right ventral (= anterior), middle and posterior axillary line (V/M/PAL).
13 Upper Abdominal US inNeonates, Infants andChildren: (Excluding the Kidneys)
265
• Axial sections particularly focused on portal vein and hilar structures—from
ventral and lateral approach.
• Oblique sections tilted cranially for meticulously scanning entire liver, particu-
larly for documentation of portal vein branching, hepatic veins and gall bladder.
• Standardised documentation (VAL—dened by upper pole of right kidney,
MCL—commonly dened by gall bladder, STL—dened by abdominal aorta),
section through hepatic veins, portal vein branching, main portal vein (if not
included gall bladder view) (Fig.13.1) (www.oegum.at).
Note Due to complexity of the liver, documentation and measurements in stan-
dardised sections are essential. For identication of section—include other key structures on image, particularly important for comparison during follow-up.
Fig. 13.1 Standard liver measurements and liver segments: (a) Liver anatomy with liver segments (IVIII), relevant liver vessels for anatomical classication (portal vein, hepatic vein, inferior vena cava) and standard planes for US measurements, particularly right anterior axillar line (AL), right and left middle clavicular line (r/lMCL) and medially positioned sterna line (STL). Two respective normal sagittal views with important reference structure (upper pole of right kidney for AL, abdominal aorta for STL) given. (b) Standard image appearance of typical liver sections: the trans­ducer position and orientation given in the schematic drawing, with respective US images
266
Table 13.1 Normal liver size in relation to age/height
Measurements of body height related (cm) to normal liver size (cm) during childhood
M. Riccabona
13.3.3 Normal Findings
13.3.3.1 Structure
Liver has larger right and smaller left lobe, internal architecture classied by liver segments (Fig.13.1).
Parenchyma—homogenous echo of medium echogenicity, contour and borders as well as sharp and smooth margins. Size varies with age, particularly height— measurements correlated with normograms (Table13.1).
Note Physiologically left liver lobe much larger in neonates than in older ages; it
gradually shows relative decrease in size after closure of ductus venosus.
13.3.3.2 Ligaments
Ligamentum falciforme hepatis, ligamentum teres hepatis and ligamentum triangu­lare hepatis x liver within abdomen, usually only seen with ascites.
13.3.3.3 Hepatic Veins (HV)
Converge cranially to drain into subdiaphragmatic inferior cava vein (ICV) or into right atrium. Usually three main liver veins (+ caudate vein); additional veins or varied insertion at different levels of intrahepatic ICV exist as normal variants. Size may vary with respiration and intravascular volume—usually exhibit smooth border and straight course, with relatively thin low echogenicity wall.
13.3.3.4 Portal Vein (PV)
Enters at hepatic hilus, should not show tapering (would be a sign of portal hyper­tension). Branches between left and right PV in liver centrally, left PV shows focal ectasia (Rex recessus, sinus venosus) at area of former insertion of umbilical vein draining via venous duct of Arantii (ductus venosus) to right atrium during foetal circulation. Wall slightly more echogenic, partially increased by periportal struc­tures (bile ducts, accompanying arteries). Periportal region gets enlarged and more
abc
13 Upper Abdominal US inNeonates, Infants andChildren: (Excluding the Kidneys)
Fig. 13.2 Neonatal liver: (a) Physiologic persistent ductus venosus (++). (b) Flow and patency of neonatally persistent ductus venosus depicted by CDS—ow direction documented by Doppler trace. (c) Still visible umbilical vein with catheter (arrow)
267
echogenic in various conditions or may appear prominent with decreased echo­genicity of liver parenchyma.
Note In neonates (during rst weeks of life), communication may persist between sinus venous and ICV/right atrium (“physiologically persistent ductus venous” Fig. 13.2a)—should obliterate spontaneously. Persistent ductus venosus usually indicates underlying liver disease with increased peripheral liver resistance. Umbilical vein may be visible in neonates physiologically, but shows no ow— consequently thromboses and vanishes; persisting (inverted) ow in umbilical vein—sign for portal hypertension and consequent portosystemic shunt. A non­functioning umbilical vein catheter may end in this vein—actively search for it (Fig.13.2b).
13.3.3.5 Hepatic Artery (HA)
Can be followed from its origin at coeliac trunk parallel to PV to branching into left and right HA.
Usually CDS enables easy identication and differentiation from other tubular structures, particularly in liver periphery, where differentiation of HA from (dilated) intrahepatic bile ducts is otherwise difcult.
Numerous normal variants in HA anatomy, e.g. accessory left HA from coe-
Note
liac trunk or gastric artery, separate origin of right HA from superior mesenteric artery. CDS particularly valuable for assessing these anatomic variants.
13.3.3.6 Gall Bladder
Positioned on lower surface of liver, centrally close to hilus on right side. Usually shows thin wall, contents unechoic. Size can vary with time since feeding. Best seen in subcostal oblique view in MCL.
Note
An empty or poorly lled gall bladder, particularly if relatively large when
lled, may show a pseudothickened wall (Fig.13.3a) and can be difcult to depict (e.g. in a gaseous abdomen of a crying neonate).
268
M. Riccabona
Fig. 13.3 Bile system: (a) Normal, nearly empty gall bladder (+…+) with pseudothickening of wall. (b) Normal common hepatic duct ( tion shows pancreatic portion of prominent common bile duct
3, 2
++), conuence with cystic duct (1++). (c) Axial sec-
13.3.3.7 Common Bile Duct
Commonly Addressed asHepato-Choledochal Duct
Usually crosses main PV and runs through head of pancreas to papilla/ampulla of Vater.
Note Duct (even ductus cysticus) often visible using high-resolution linear trans-
ducers (Fig.13.3b, c).
13.3.3.8 Intrahepatic Bile Ducts
Course parallel to PVs—usually only depicted centrally or if dilated.
13.3.3.9 Doppler Findings
Hepatic Veins (HV)
Show bi- or triphasic undulating ow pattern, bidirectional ow direction. Undulation caused by respiration and heart cycle (Fig.13.4a). Absence of typical pattern usually indicates either increased liver resistance or increased right atrial pressure/volume overload.
Note Flow proles may vary within the three main veins, also depends on point of
insertion and manoeuvres used for visualisation (such as breath holding). Undulation must always persist; bidirectional or triphasic pattern may physiologically be absent.
Portal Vein (PV)
Usually shows constant ow into liver with some mild respiratory modulation (Fig.13.4b–d).
Flow velocities vary with age (Table13.2a) and fasting status.
Note Also main intrahepatic PV branches should be assessed to show patency of at
least main right and main left PV. Flow velocity measurements strongly rely on proper angle correction and good insonation angle (<60°).