Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5795_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
158
Fig. 8.42 US for skull fracture. (a) Linear transducer: skull fracture sees as disruption of skull echo. (b) Linear transducer: skull fracture with subacute haematoma
M. Riccabona
8.3.10 Tumours andSpace-Occupying Lesions
Intracranial tumours represent 15% of childhood tumours, most occurring beyond rst year of life—therefore not ideally suitable for US diagnosis; in these ages only large tumours depicted particularly if they cause midline shift or hydrocephalus:
• In infancy mostly teratoma, craniopharyngioma, medulloblastoma/PNET, cho­roid plexus papilloma and lipoma.
• Older children—larger variety of different tumours.
US Findings
Tumour echogenicity and texture—nonspecic: homogeneous or heterogeneous, cystic or necrotic areas, haemorrhage and may contain calcications (only large calcications cause acoustic shadowing).
Secondary signs—consequences of space-occupying lesions—shift/compres-
sion of surrounding structures, compression of ventricle and hydrocephalus.
Some specic appearances:
• Echogenic tumour typically in midline—rather specic for (callosal) lipoma.
• Choroid plexus papilloma—homogenously echogenic, within plexus, inhomog­enous tumours may represent carcinoma; very vascular—CDS is helpful.
Additional imaging by preferably MRI or—if not available—CT.
Note
8.3.10.1 Vascular Malformations
Difcult to depict on US, particularly beyond rst months of life, contrast-enhanced CDS may increase US potential.
Typical entity—phakomatosis (e.g. Klippel–Trénaunay syndrome, Von Hippel–
Lindau syndrome and Bourneville–Pringle disease), tubers and gliomas manifest in more central portions or at ventricular margins—more easily depicted than common peripheral or meningeal lesions (particularly venous ectasia with calci­cation and thrombosis) as in Klippel–Trénaunay, and easily missed contrast­enhanced MRI.
ab
bc
8 Neurosonography inNeonates, Infants andChildren
159
US Appearance
• Echogenic—if consisting of many small vessels.
• Tubular or cystic—if consisting of larger vessels and aneurysmal vascular por­tions (Fig.8.43).
• Show vivid Doppler ow only with large or high ow shunts: feeding and drain­ing vessels depictable.
• Purely venous malformations have low ow—difcult to depict, particularly on transcranial imaging.
• Ce-US may improve differentiation from other lesions.
aCDS: helpful particularly in neonates and young infants for:
• Vascular pathology: malformations and aneurysms (intra- and extracranial):
– Particularly typical arteriovenous malformation/stula of vein of Galen
(Figs.8.44a–c).
Fig. 8.43 (a) Axial view by TCI-CD: ow in aneurysmatic portion of a vein of Galen malforma- tion, some feeding arteries seen as well as the enlarged draining vein (with high and turbulent ow causing aliasing). (b) US appearance in a typical neonatal cerebral AVM—ectatic/aneurysmal vein of Galen malformation. Midline sagittal view: large cystic formation lled with oating echoes— vein of Galen malformation
a
Fig. 8.44 CDS in cranial and cerebral AVM. (a, b) Focal mass suspected to be a skin haemangi- oma on the skull; CDS demonstrates vivid vascularisation. Note: Mirror image artefact both on grey scale and on CDS caused by the highly reective skull bone. (c) Superior sinus thrombosis, sagittal view: CDS demonstrates lack of ow in the superior sagittal sinus which is also somewhat inhomogenously echogenic; consequently dilated extra-axial CSF space
160
M. Riccabona
Note In vascular malformations, CDS can be misleading, particularly after haem-
orrhage or with thrombotic components, often differentiation from tumours and other mass lesions impossible.
• Venous thrombosis—poor insonation angle and low ow may impair conven­tional CDS potential (Fig.8.44d).
• Signicantly hyperperfused tumours (e.g. plexus papilloma—see Fig.8.38d):
– Otherwise aCDS not particularly useful for cerebral tumours. – Potentially for DDx of necrotic parts or compartments containing compli-
cated uid (e.g. abscess).
CDS in older children: to some extent transcranial ce-CDS may improve sono-
graphic potential in depicting vascular malformations or differentiating clots, necrotic areas or haemorrhages and subacute infarctions from tumours. Atypical ow patterns may inbdicate shunt ow and allow rough estimation of hemodynamics.
8.3.11 Cerebral Calcifications
Introduction
Various causes: prenatal infection, peri- and postnatal meningitis, vascular malfor­mations, posthaemorrhagic, neoplastic, phakomatoses, postthrombotic, etc.
Localisation
• Commonly in supratentorial brain, mostly in basal ganglia and also hemispheres.
• Commonly in vicinity of vessels and in choroid plexus.
• Calcication-like echoes in cysts or abscess-like formations—suspicion for par­asitic or fungal infection, if in cyst wall—hint at unusual origin (infectious, pos­thaemorrhagic, tumourous, etc.).
Meningeal calcications difcult to depict on US.
Note
US Findings (See Fig.8.28a)
• Usually echogenic formations with sharp borders can be scattered and may vary in size and echogenicity.
• Small calcications lack typical acoustic shadowing.
• Differential diagnosis of calcications difcult by US:
– Aetiology can only be assumed in combination with other imaging and par-
ticularly clinical information.
8.3.11.1 Non-calcifying Vasculopathy
(Lenticulostriate Vasculopathy)
Band-like echogenic stripes along vessels, mostly in the basal ganglia (see Fig.8.28b).
8 Neurosonography inNeonates, Infants andChildren
161
8.4 Ultrasound oftheSkull
8.4.1 Introduction
US can be used for assessment of subcutaneous pathology as well as disruption of skull surface.
Always use linear high-resolution high-frequency transducer and plenty US gel.
8.4.2 Haematoma
Types of haematoma—see Fig.8.36.
US helpful in differentiating entity:
• Echogenicity and US appearance may help estimate age:
– Acute bleed—rather hyperechoic. – Older bleed—hypoechoic with sedimentation. – Chronic bleed or remnants/seroma—anechoic, capsule formation.
8.4.3 Space-Occupying Lesions andTumours
US—resembles nding in other small parts (see respective chapter), may visualise cysts, tumours, metastases, etc.
• US mostly unspecic—but will indicate and tailor further imaging.
• US helpful for DDx—erosion of tabula externa/only in soft tissue (epidermoid?) cyst/lesion arising from bone (e.g., histiocytosis), severe destruction suspicious for malignancy (e.g. sarcomatous tumours—Fig. 8.45).
8.4.4 Skull Fracture
• US depicts disruption of echogenic calvarial bone surface—helpful for assessing suspicious ndings on plain lm (Fig.8.42).
• US may help analyse amount of displacement.
• US may help in follow-up—e.g. if growing fracture suspected.
US used to assess sutures and their ossication+ differentiating sutures from
fractures:
• Fracture—typically sharp border.
• Suture—dentates shape of borders, similar to plain lm; US also used to assess craniosynostosis in some places.
162
ab
M. Riccabona
dc
*
Fig. 8.45 US of skull lesions: obvious destruction of mastoid bone penetrating deep—not typical for mastoiditis, eventually proven to be a sarcoma: (a) Grey scale US showing the soft tissue mass eroding mastoid bone. (b) CDS depicts irregular vessels within mass. (c) CT (arrow) and (d) MRI (asterix) conrm osseous destruction and intracranial invasion of the soft tissue tumour
• 3DUS with surface rendering helpful for differentiation, conspicuously visual­ises shape of fracture (see respective chapter).

8.5 Additional Imaging

8.5.1 Plain Film
Used for visualisation of osseous structures.
• Particularly when looking for fractures, calcications, skull defects, skull anom­alies, etc.
– Dedicated projections used for assessment of premature synostosis.
• Assess continuity of shunt drains.
8 Neurosonography inNeonates, Infants andChildren
163
8.5.2 CT
Indicated for emergency imaging, particularly in older children.
• After trauma, suspected haemorrhages and for complicated fractures (always with surface rendering).
• Hydrocephalus/follow-up after shunt (use specic low-dose protocols)—if no MRI available or contraindicated/unsuitable.
• Stroke (if MRI not available).
• Tumours (if MRI not available).
• CT-angiography used for vascular assessment:
– Modern volume CT and CT-DSA allow for angiography-like subtraction
images as well as perfusion studies.
Note Considerable radiation burden—try to replace by MRI whenever possible.
8.5.3 MRI
Ideal non-ionising imaging modality indicated for
• Assessment of brain parenchyma, maturation and myelination, metabolic dis­ease, tumours, malformations, etc.
• MR angiography, diffusion weighted imaging, perfusion imaging, MR spectros­copy—helpful additional tools for dedicated queries.
Note Small children require sedation.
8.5.4 Catheter Angiography
For assessment of vascular problems, if interventional treatment is an option.
8.5.5 Additional Supporting Procedures
Fundoscopy, US of eye and orbit, lumbar puncture, brain pressure monitoring, EEG, laboratory tests, etc.
Note Choice of diagnostic test depends on the clinical query, potentially also on
laboratory ndings, but mainly on patient age. Consider US rst whenever brain sonographically accessible, even if only providing an orienting imaging approach (allowing tailoring of additional diagnostic imaging).
164
ab
M. Riccabona
8.6 Ultrasound oftheEye andtheOrbit
8.6.1 Introduction
Ocular globe—ideal US window into orbit. Many queries can be approached, not only within eye but also in deeper spaces. This is a simple and easy applicable tech­nique that may reveal all necessary information and should be promoted, particu­larly in terms of radiation protection.
How to Perform
• Eyelid closed, warmed US gel placed and avoid pressure.
• Globe and orbit are visualised through closed eyelid with high-resolution linear and sector arrays.
Note Reduce output gain to avoid heating of bulb uid (MI at lowest possible limit,
~0.1 to 0.3, up to maximal 0.5 for short time) and avoid (a)CDS unless necessary for enabling diagnosis.
8.6.2 Normal Findings
Typically all major structures seen should be documented in two planes: anechoic lens, corpus vitreum, smooth border of retina, outer contour of spheric bulb and papilla just in front of attachment of optic nerve (Fig.8.46).
Behind eye: retrobulbar fat, optic nerve accompanied by nerve sheet and vessels
and major eye muscles.
Note Pictogram with denition of US plane using clocklike descriptions is helpful
for follow-up.
Fig. 8.46 Normal eye US. (a) Normal US appearance of eye ball and optic nerve. (b) CDS with central vessels
8 Neurosonography inNeonates, Infants andChildren
165
8.6.3 Sonographically Depictable Pathology
Congestion of Papilla: Papilla swollen, elevation from retina can be measured, mea­surements vary with equipment and age.
Optic nerve sheet widened—associated with increased intracranial pressure
(Fig.8.47).
Foreign bodies: direct visualisation of foreign object, changes in consistency of
bulbar uid (glaucoma) and haemorrhage.
Retinal displacement: with or without adjacent pathology, coloboma, persistent
membranes, microphthalmia, etc.
Tumours: retinoblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, lymphoma, glioma, optic glioma,
orbital lymphangioma/haemangioma, etc. (DDx, e.g. congenital glaucoma, persist­ing embryonal vitreous body and artery, etc.) (Fig.8.48a, b, d, f):
• Orbital abscesses/inammation (Fig.8.48d):
– Commonly situated at thin osseous margin in median compartment adjacent
to ethmoid sinus, becomes sonolucent in case of thinning and decalcication from inammation.
US of Adjacent Structures
Dacryocystocele—easily diagnosed:
• Cystic structure in median outer compartment of eye with dilated proximal naso­lacrimal duct, usually containing echoes, which move under slight transducer pressure (Fig.8.48d).
• Helps differentiation from ventral encephalo- or meningocele or tumour conditions.
Fig. 8.47 Retrobulbar magnied view: dilated optic nerve sheath (arrow). Dilated optic nerve sheet () in hydrocephalus
166
M. Riccabona
a
d
Fig. 8.48 Pathology depictable on US of the eye and orbit. (a) Retinoblastoma: echogenic mass lling bulb. (b) CDS demonstrates irregular vessels within tumour arising from ophthalmic/retinal artery (same patient as image a); (c) Retinocytoma: partially calcied mass with small complex cystic components adjacent to optic papilla (+….+). (d) Orbital abscess (+ +) adjacent to bony border with ethmoid sinus. (e) Dacryocystocele (+ +) of left eye. (f) Congenital glaucoma with visualisation of vitreous artery
b
e
c
f
US for treatment guidance: instillation of sclerotherapeutic agents in lymphatic
malformations (see respective chapter). US guidance for manual decompression of dacryocystocele by massage with gentle pressure, ...
Eye US—promising and helpful bedside noninvasive application, but rarely
Note
used. Further details can be found in the literature.
US oftheNeonatal Spinal Canal andCord
MichaelRiccabona

9.1 Introduction

Vertebrae are not completely ossied in early childhood=spinal canal and content accessible by US in neonates (and infants) to assess for normal as well as typical pathological ndings.

9.2 Requisites

Spinal US possible as long as non-ossied posterior arches allow access to spinal canal during rst months of life.
Thereafter, sonolucent vertebral disc can be used for limited views, but due to
ossied vertebral bodies and arches continuous assessment of spinal canal becomes impossible.
9
9.3 Transducers andTechnique
Dorsal approach: standard access from midline, high-resolution high-frequency linear transducers (18–5MHz).
Sagittal+axial sections performed throughout the entire region of interest:
• Baby or child placed in prone or decubitus position, supporting pillow/towel can be helpful.
M. Riccabona (*) Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Medical University Graz and University Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria e-mail: michael.riccabona@klinikum-graz.at
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 M. Riccabona (ed.), Pediatric Ultrasound,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47910-7_9
167