Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5789_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Series Foreword
- •Book Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Opening Round
- •CASE 2
- •CASE 5
- •CASE 6
- •CASE 7
- •CASE 3
- •CASE 4
- •CASE 8
- •CASE 9
- •CASE 10
- •CASE 11
- •CASE 12
- •CASE 13
- •CASE 14
- •CASE 15
- •CASE 16
- •CASE 17
- •CASE 18
- •CASE 19
- •CASE 20
- •CASE 21
- •CASE 22
- •CASE 23
- •CASE 24
- •CASE 25
- •CASE 26
- •CASE 27
- •CASE 28
- •CASE 29
- •CASE 31
- •CASE 32
- •CASE 33
- •CASE 34
- •CASE 35
- •CASE 36
- •CASE 37
- •CASE 38
- •CASE 39
- •CASE 40
- •CASE 41
- •CASE 42
- •CASE 43
- •CASE 44
- •CASE 45
- •CASE 46
- •CASE 47
- •CASE 48
- •CASE 49
- •CASE 50
- •CASE 51
- •Fair Play
- •CASE 53
- •CASE 54
- •CASE 55
- •CASE 56
- •CASE 57
- •CASE 58
- •CASE 59
- •CASE 60
- •CASE 61
- •CASE 62
- •CASE 63
- •CASE 64
- •CASE 65
- •CASE 66
- •CASE 67
- •CASE 68
- •CASE 69
- •CASE 70
- •CASE 71
- •CASE 72
- •CASE 73
- •CASE 74
- •CASE 75
- •CASE 76
- •CASE 77
- •CASE 78
- •CASE 79
- •CASE 80
- •CASE 81
- •CASE 82
- •CASE 83
- •CASE 84
- •CASE 85
- •CASE 86
- •CASE 87
- •CASE 88
- •CASE 89
- •CASE 90
- •CASE 91
- •Challenge
- •CASE 93
- •CASE 94
- •CASE 95
- •CASE 96
- •CASE 97
- •CASE 98
- •CASE 99
- •CASE 100
- •CASE 101
- •CASE 102
- •CASE 103
- •CASE 104
- •CASE 105
- •CASE 106
- •CASE 107
- •CASE 108
- •CASE 109
- •CASE 110
- •CASE 111
- •CASE 112
- •CASE 113
- •CASE 114
- •CASE 115
- •CASE 116
- •CASE 117
- •CASE 118
- •CASE 119
- •Index Of Cases
- •Index of Terms

ANSWERS
CASE 32
Ectopic Pregnancy, Unruptured
1. A, B, and C
2. C
3. A
4. C
References
Dialani V, Levine D: Ectopic pregnancy: a review. Ultrasound Q 2004;
20(3):105-117.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15322388 (Accessed on June 6,
2012.)
Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, et al: Ectopic pregnancies in Cesarean
section scars: the 8 year experience of one medical center. Hum Reprod
2004; 19(2):278-284.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14747167 (Accessed on June 6,
2012.)
Maymon R, Svirsky R, Smorgick N, et al: Fertility performance and obstetric
outcomes among women with previous cesarean scar pregnancy. J Ultra-
sound Med 2011; 30(9):1179-1184.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21876087 (Accessed on June 6,
2012.)
Cross-Reference
Ultrasound: The REQUISITES, 2nd ed, pp 357-370.
Comment
Ultrasound Imaging of Ectopic Pregnancy
Detection of a true intrauterine gestational sac is paramount to
the exclusion of an ectopic pregnancy, which usually occurs in
the distal fallopian tube. An intraendometrial uid collection,
also known as a decidual cast or pseudogestational sac (Figure A),
should not be misinterpreted as a gestational sac. These collections can be seen in an ectopic pregnancy and are caused by
the hormonal inuence. Several characteristics of a true early
intrauterine gestational sac have been shown to be helpful in
distinguishing this from intraendometrial uid when the intrauterine pregnancy is visualized before the development of a
yolk sac or fetal pole.
Ultrasound Finding of Intradecidual Sign
Before the double decidual sac becomes apparent, the location
of the sac is an important criterion. The intradecidual sign refers
to a sac located adjacent to, or abutting, the endometrial lining,
embedded within the decidual reaction. The decidual cast, or
intraendometrial uid that is seen in cases of ectopic pregnancies, is located within the uterine cavity. The ultrasound nding
of the intradecidual sign has been shown to exclude reliably an
ectopic pregnancy. Use of transvaginal ultrasound and betahuman chorionic gonadotropin evaluation has led to a reduction in the need for diagnostic laparoscopy.
Double Decidual Reaction
The double decidual reaction refers to two concentric hyperechoic
rings that surround the early intrauterine gestational sac. This
sign may not be present with a normal intrauterine gestational
sac. The chorionic rim, a hyperechoic rim bordering an intrauterine collection of uid, has been shown to be a more sensitive
indicator of an intrauterine pregnancy, particularly if diastolic
ow is high. Although color Doppler imaging can be used,
pulsed Doppler should not be used on or near a normal embryo.
Decidual Cysts
Decidual cysts are simple cysts, 1 to 5 mm in diameter, that
are located in the decidual reaction and are remote from the
endometrial canal. They may be found at the junction of the
endometrium and myometrium. They do not have a hyperechoic trophoblastic ring and are believed to represent an early
breakdown of the decidua.
Ectopic Pregnancy in a Cesarean Section Scar
Figure B shows a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy developing in a cesarean section scar in a different patient. Although
rare, the number of primary and recurrent cesarean scar
pregnancies has been increasing. The clinical presentation
is usually vaginal bleeding. Women at risk have a history of
placental pathology, ectopic pregnancy, multiple cesarean sections, and cesarean breech delivery. Failure to recognize this
type of ectopic pregnancy may result in uterine rupture and
maternal morbidity, either from progression of the disorder or
from inappropriate curettage for a presumed failed intrauterine
pregnancy with subsequent hemorrhage.
66

CASE 33
A
History: A patient presents with a question of a cardiac
nding on a prior ultrasound scan.
1. What should be included in the differential diagnosis?
(Choose all that apply.)
A. Physiologic
B. Structural cardiac abnormality
C. Chromosomal abnormalities
D. Hydrops
E. Fetal arrhythmia
2. Which of the following is a technical factor that causes
difculty in diagnosing pericardial uid?
A. When the axis of the interventricular septum is perpen-
dicular to the ultrasound beam
B. Echoic dropout of the ventricular myocardium
C. Use of color Doppler
D. Use of M-mode
B
3. When a pericardial effusion is present, which of the following actions is not recommended?
A. Do nothing.
B. Follow up.
C. Offer fetal karyotyping.
D. Perform fetal echocardiography.
4. Which of the following statements regarding the prognosis
of a fetus with pericardial effusion is true?
A. Larger pericardial effusions have a worse prognosis
than smaller ones.
B. The presence of hydrops or extracardiac malformations
is associated with low mortality.
C. The combination of structural heart disease with peri-
cardial effusion is associated with high mortality.
D. Pericardial effusions can never be present in normal
healthy fetuses.
67

ANSWERS
CASE 33
Pericardial Effusion
1. B, C, D, and E
2. B
3. A
4. C
References
DeVore GR, Horenstein J: Color Doppler identication of a pericardial
effusion in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4(2):115-120.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12797204 (Accessed on June 6,
2012.)
Sharland G, Lockhart S: Isolated pericardial effusion: an indication for fetal
karyotyping? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6(1):29-32.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8528797 (Accessed on June 6, 2012.)
Slesnick TC, Ayres NA, Altman CA, et al: Characteristics and outcomes of
fetuses with pericardial effusions. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96(4):599-601.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16098320 (Accessed on June 6,
2012.)
Cross-Reference
Ultrasound: The REQUISITES, 2nd ed, pp 419-422.
Comment
Differential Diagnosis
Fetal pericardial effusions are often seen with fetal congestive heart failure, sometimes along with hydrops fetalis.
They may also be seen in association with chromosomal
abnormalities (particularly trisomy 21); cardiac malformations (heterotaxy syndrome being most common); infectious
processes; fetal arrhythmias (supraventricular tachycardia
occurring most frequently); or extracardiac malformations,
including pericardial teratomas, congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations, omphaloceles, and liver or kidney
masses. A pericardial effusion sometimes may be present in
normal healthy fetuses.
Ultrasound Findings
Fetal pericardial effusion is best identied on a four-chamber
view of the heart with the ultrasound beam perpendicular to
the interventricular septum (Figures A and B). Effusion is
anechoic and separates the pericardium from the epicardium.
Difculty arises in diagnosis because of signal dropout in the
ventricular myocardium, which is noted in 94% of fetuses and
can be mistaken for effusion. Color Doppler helps in these
cases; in the presence of pericardial effusion, color Doppler
signals in the pericardial space are opposite to the direction of
blood ow entering and exiting the ventricles. Use of M-mode
also aids in diagnosis, but it may be difcult to interpret if one
is unfamiliar with its use. Normal rim of pericardial uid measures 2 mm and is of no pathologic signicance.
Prognosis and Management
When a fetal pericardial effusion is detected, a diligent search
should be performed for any ultrasound evidence of structural
cardiac or extracardiac anomalies or fetal arrhythmias; this is
done by a detailed fetal anatomy ultrasound scan and fetal
echocardiography. Cardiac function should be evaluated, and
assessment should be performed for hydrops. If the effusion is
determined to be isolated, fetal karyotyping should be offered.
There is a high incidence of chromosomal anomalies in fetuses
with isolated effusions, particularly trisomy 21. The size of the
pericardial effusion is an unreliable predictor of outcome. The
presence of associated abnormalities such as hydrops or structural cardiac and extracardiac defects is associated with poor
prognosis. However, normal healthy fetuses may have pericardial effusions, and these cases have an excellent prognosis.
Acknowledgment
Special thanks are extended to Vishal Sidhar, MD, and Simran
Sekhon, MD, for their contribution to preparing this case.
68

CASE 34
A
B
History: A patient undergoes a 22-week prenatal ultrasound
examination.
1. What should be included in the differential diagnosis for an
enlarged kidney with multiple hypoechoic uid-lled spaces
in a fetus on prenatal examination? (Choose all that apply.)
A. Hydronephrosis
B. Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease
C. Multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK)
D. Bilateral subdiaphragmatic pulmonary sequestrations
E. Bilateral mesonephric blastomas
2. Which of the following entities is the most likely cause of
noncommunicating cyst?
A. MCDK
B. Posterior urethral valves
C. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction
D. Vesicoureteral reux
C
Used with permission from Anderson Publishing Ltd., from Victoria
T, et al: Fetal MRI of common non-CNS abnormalities: a review. Appl
Radiol 40(6):8-17, 2011. © Anderson Publishing Ltd.
3. Which of the following studies is not part of the standard
workup of the differential diagnosis?
A. Postnatal ultrasound
B. CT
C. MRI
D. Voiding cystourethrogram
4. Without intervention, noncomplicated MCDK tends to
result in which of the following?
A. Renal hypertension
B. Malignant degeneration
C. Partial involution
D. Gartner cyst and seminal vesicle cyst
69

ANSWERS
CASE 34
Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney
1. A and C
2. A
3. B
4. C
References
Feldenberg LR, Siegel NJ: Clinical course and outcome for children with
multicystic dysplastic kidneys. Pediatr Nephrol 2000; 14(12):1098-1101.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11045394 (Accessed on June 6,
2012.)
Hains DS, Bates CM, Ingraham S, et al: Management and etiology of the
unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney: a review. Pediatr Nephrol 2009;
24(2):133-242.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18481111 (Accessed on June 6,
2012.)
Mercado-Deane MG, Beeson JE, John SD: US of renal insufciency in
neonates. Radiographics 2002; 22(6):1429-1238.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12432113 (Accessed on June 6,
2012.)
ischemia during embryogeneis, genetic disturbances, teratogens, and in utero infections. Contralateral renal abnormalities, such as vesicoureteral reux, can occur. Evaluation of the
integrity of the contralateral kidney is imperative to identify
at-risk patients because reux or obstruction can impair and
damage the remaining functioning kidney.
Typically, MCDK is found to be unilateral in children
because bilateral MCDKs lead to oligohydramnios, which is
incompatible with life. However, prenatally MCDK is associated with contralateral renal abnormalities, such as hydronephrosis, renal agenesis, or MCDK. The key to survival is
adequate urine production with resultant normal amniotic
uid volume. Severe bilateral disease leads to oligohydramniosis and death. Noncommunicating cysts are a key feature to
distinguish MCDK from hydronephrosis; ultrasound shows
organized positioning of symmetric uid-lled spaces. The
noncommunicating cysts of MCDK are well identied on
MRI (Figure C). The affected kidney is nonfunctional, which
can be conrmed by nuclear medicine studies after birth. After
birth, chronic MCDK in children exhibits curvilinear calcied
cystic walls, creating a “cluster of grapes” sign.
Cross-Reference
Ultrasound: The REQUISITES, 2nd ed, pp 465-466.
Comment
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis of multiple uid-lled structures
in an enlarged kidney includes MCDK and hydronephrosis.
Hydronephrosis of varying types would be considered in the
differential diagnosis, although these cystic structures are symmetrically arranged and communicate with the dilated renal
pelvis.
Ultrasound Findings
Ultrasound shows a disorganized pattern of noncommunicating hypoechoic areas of various shapes and sizes without
connections or with dominant medial cyst and without recognizable renal parenchyma (Figures A and B). Scant dysplastic parenchyma may be visible between the cysts, but normal
renal parenchyma and reniform shape are lost. Pathologically,
the renal parenchyma in MCDK is nearly completely replaced
by multiple thin-walled cysts. Many etiologies have been proposed, including ureteric bud atresia, outow obstruction or
Prognosis and Management
MCDK is usually diagnosed during routine prenatal ultrasound scanning or is diagnosed in a neonate presenting with
an abdominal mass. In the past, nephrectomy was the standard of care. However, most individuals with MCDK are
asymptomatic. More recent observations show high rates of
spontaneous involution with age, low rates of hypertension,
and a risk of tumorigenesis that is likely no greater than in
normal kidneys. If MCDK is suspected prenatally, postnatal
ultrasound conrms the diagnosis, and screening for other
urinary tract anomalies is critical. If screening test results
are normal, follow-up ultrasound in 6 weeks to reduce falsepositive errors is performed. Further follow-up at 2, 5, and
10 years is considered reasonable to document involution of
the MCDK and compensatory hypertrophy of the contralateral kidney.
Acknowledgment
Special thanks are extended to Holly Marciniak Thompson,
MD, for her contribution to preparing this case.
70

CASE 35
A
C
History: A 32-year-old patient undergoes routine prenatal
second-trimester ultrasound screening.
1. Which second-trimester ultrasound markers aid in detecting Down syndrome? (Choose all that apply.)
A. Thickened nuchal fold
B. Absent or short nasal bone
C. Echogenic intracardiac focus (EIF)
D. Pyelectasis
E. Short long bones
2. Which of the following statements regarding EIF is true?
A. It is a highly specic marker for Down syndrome.
B. It can be seen in normal fetuses.
C. It is best detected when the fetal heart is horizontal with
respect to the ultrasound beam.
D. Any echogenic focus is signicant.
3. To evaluate the nasal bone correctly in the second trimester,
what should the angle of insonation be from the longitudinal axis of the fetal nose?
A. 45 degrees
B. 60 degrees
B
C. 90 degrees
D. 75 degrees
4. How is pyelectasis dened in the second trimester?
A. Renal pelvis anteroposterior (AP) dimension 4 mm or
greater in transverse plane
B. Renal pelvis AP dimension 2 mm or greater in trans-
verse plane
C. Renal pelvis AP dimension 3 mm or greater in trans-
verse plane
D. Renal pelvis AP dimension 8 mm or greater in trans-
verse plane
71

ANSWERS
CASE 35
Trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome)—Basic
1. A, B, C, D, and E
2. B
3. C
4. A
Reference
Benacerraf BR: The history of the second-trimester sonographic markers for
detecting fetal Down syndrome, and their current role in obstetric practice.
Prenat Diagn 2010; 30(7):644-652.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20572106 (Accessed on June 6,
2012.)
Cross-Reference
Ultrasound: The REQUISITES, 2nd ed, pp 394-453.
Comment
Differential Diagnosis
Commonly used markers and anomalies associated with Down
syndrome in second-trimester fetuses are as follows:
• Heart defect, especially atrioventricular canal (endocardial
cushion defect) but also other cardiac malformation
• Ventriculomegaly
• Duodenal atresia (after 22 weeks’ gestation)
• Thickened nuchal fold
• Absent or short nasal bone
• Short long bones (femur and humerus)
• Hyperechoic bowel
• EIF
• Pyelectasis
Ultrasound Findings
Specic cardiac features associated with Down syndrome
include ventricular disproportion and septal defects. Duodenal atresia is identied as two uid-lled upper abdominal
structures, the stomach and proximal duodenum—the double
bubble sign. The nuchal fold measurement is made on transverse section across the fetal head, angled caudally to include
the occipital bone and the cerebellum. The measurement is
made from the outside of the occipital bone to the skin edge
and is considered thickened at 6 mm or greater (Figure A).
Although most centers use 6 mm as the measurement for
abnormal nuchal thickness, some other authors use 5 mm or
greater. This measurement improves sensitivity but increases
the number of false-positive examinations. Absent or short
nasal bone is one of the most promising newest markers. For
correct evaluation of the nasal bone in the second trimester, it
is important that the angle of insonation be 90 degrees from
the longitudinal axis of the fetal nose (Figure B). An individual
with Down syndrome has a short stature with a short femur
and humerus (Figure B). These are considered minor markers
because of their prevalence in the normal population and variability in different ethnic groups. Hyperechoic bowel is dened
as fetal bowel that is as echogenic as bone. However, this is a
subjective nding and difcult to use because echogenicity of
fetal bowel is affected by transducer frequency and machine
settings. EIF is identied as an echogenic focus that is as bright
as bone and best detected when the heart is vertically aligned
with the ultrasound beam (Figure C). Pyelectasis in a secondtrimester fetus is dened as renal pelvis AP dimension 4 mm
or greater in transverse plane.
Prognosis and Management
A cluster of markers has a much higher likelihood ratio than
any individual markers, indicating that when multiple markers
are present, the patient could go from a low-risk to a highrisk category. A normal ultrasound examination with no markers results in a 50% to 80% reduction in risk of fetal Down
syndrome; this could be used to lower a prior risk and reassure patients, enabling them to forgo invasive procedures. The
results of the ultrasound scan need to be taken into consideration with other risk factors, including maternal age and serum
biochemical markers, to determine best the true risk factors.
Acknowledgment
Special thanks are extended to Simran Sekhon, MD, for her
contribution to preparing this case.
72

CASE 36
History: A pregnant patient presents with an infectious
process.
1. What is the diagnostic nding on the ultrasound in the Figure in addition to gender?
A. Oligohydramnios
B. Abruption
C. Polyhydramnios
D. Subchorionic bleed
2. What two fetal organ systems have abnormalities associated
with this condition?
A. Gastrointestinal (GI) tract and central nervous system
(CNS)
B. GI tract and urinary tract
C. CNS and urinary tract
D. Cardiac system and CNS
3. What renal mass is associated with this condition?
A. Mesoblastic nephroma
B. Single renal cyst
C. Hypernephroma
D. Multicystic dysplastic kidney
4. What percentage of cases with polyhydramnios have fetal
anomalies?
A. 90%
B. Less than 1%
C. 50% to 60%
D. 12% to 20%
73

ANSWERS
CASE 36
Polyhydramnios
1. C
2. A
3. A
4. D
Reference
Barnhard Y, Bar-Hava I, Divon MY: Is polyhydramnios in an ultrasonograph-
ically normal fetus an indication for genetic evaluation? Am J Obstet Gynecol
1995; 173(5):1523-1527.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7503195 (Accessed on June 6, 2012.)
Cross-Reference
Ultrasound: The REQUISITES, 2nd ed, pp 375-376, 378, 435-437.
Comment
Causes and Measurement of Polyhydramnios
Polyhydramnios (see Figure) may not manifest until after
24 weeks’ gestation. Causes include maternal, fetal, and placental abnormalities. The quantity of uid can be an indicator of
the cause. Mild increases in amniotic uid are often idiopathic.
Larger volumes of uid more commonly indicate the presence
of an anomaly. The ability to make the diagnosis based on a
single ultrasound image emphasizes the importance of subjective evaluation of the uid volume; in addition, the amniotic
uid index can be calculated and compared with the range of
normal for the specic gestational age.
Fetal Anomalies
Fetal anomalies are present in approximately 12% to 20% of
cases. These anomalies relate to the inability of the fetus to
swallow the amniotic uid or an obstruction to the passage
of amniotic uid through the GI tract. CNS malformations
such as anencephaly, encephalocele, and Dandy-Walker malformation can cause decreased swallowing. Esophageal atresia
and duodenal atresia result in GI obstruction. Thoracic masses
that obstruct the esophagus, such as a large congenital cystic
adenomatoid malformation or diaphragmatic hernia, result in
polyhydramnios. Fetal hydrops that develops from any underlying cause is another etiology.
Fetal Masses
Fetal masses manifest with secondary polyhydramnios. These
masses include head, neck, and sacrococcygeal teratoma.
Unusual associations include mesoblastic nephroma and a
large fetal ovarian cyst.
Fetal Chromosome Anomalies
Fetal chromosomal anomalies are present in 4% of cases.
These should be suspected if specic associated fetal anomalies are documented or if the fetus develops intrauterine
growth restriction.
Other Causes of Polyhydramnios
Certain causes may not be apparent on prenatal ultrasound,
including maternal diabetes mellitus or infection (the cause in
this case) triggered by cytomegalovirus or Toxoplasma gondii.
74

CASE 37
A
History: Two images of placentas are presented. Figure A is
from one asymptomatic pregnant patient, and Figure B is from
a second asymptomatic pregnant patient.
1. What should be included in the differential diagnosis for
the placental lesion shown in Figure A? (Choose all that
apply.)
A. Fibrin deposition
B. Hematoma
C. Placental infarct
D. Intervillous thrombus
2. Which lesion occurs more commonly on the maternal side?
A. Fluid deposition
B. Hematoma
C. Placental infarct
D. Intervillous thrombus
3. Which laboratory abnormality is associated with the above-
mentioned placental abnormalities?
A. Anemia
B. Elevated alpha-fetoprotein
C. Leukocytosis
D. Erythrocytosis
4. What is the diagnosis of the placental mass shown in Figure
B?
A. Uterine contraction
B. Chorioangioma
C. Hematoma
D. Mucin deposition
BB
75
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
