Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5789_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
37 Мб
Скачать
ANSWERS
CASE 91
Limb–Body Wall Complex
1. A, B, C, and E
2. A
3. A
4. A
References
Chen CP, Chen YY, Su JW, et al: First-trimester two-dimensional and three-
dimensional ultrasound demonstration of craniofacial defects, abdominal wall defects and upper limb deciency associated with limb-body wall
complex. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 50(4):558-560.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22212340 (Accessed on June 18, 2012.)
Chen CP, Tzen CY, Chang TY, et al: Prenatal diagnosis of acrania associated
with facial defects, amniotic bands and limb-body wall complex. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20(1):94-95.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12100428 (Accessed on June 18, 2012.)
Gorczyca DP, Lindfors KK, McGahan JP, et al: Limb-body-wall complex:
another cause for elevated maternal serum alpha fetoprotein. J Clin Ultra-
sound 1990; 18(3):198-201.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1690220 (Accessed on June 18, 2012.)
Cross-Reference
Ultrasound: The REQUISITES, 2nd ed, pp 443, 446.
Comment
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis of scoliosis is quite broad, rang­ing from meningomyelocele, which results in scoliosis, to VACTERL syndrome, which includes hemivertebrae and
associated scoliosis. Isolated hemivertebrae may cause mild scoliosis but usually not to the degree identied in this case. The two most likely differential diagnoses in this case are limb– body wall complex and amniotic band syndrome. Limb–body wall complex includes abdominal thoracic defects, craniofacial defects, scoliosis, and limb defects. There are often associated internal malformations such as cardiac defects, absent dia­phragm, and renal abnormalities. Pentalogy of Cantrell, with a large omphalocele and ectopic cordis, could also be considered.
Amniotic band syndrome also is considered within this spectrum. This syndrome includes bizarre multiple fetal ampu­tational defects as seen in this case and minor constrictive rings and limb edema. Some authorities consider amniotic band syn­drome to be a less severe form of limb–body wall complex, whereas others believe these are two separate entities.
Ultrasound Findings
Typical ultrasound features include ventral wall defects, cranio­facial defects, and scoliosis (Figures A and B). Sometimes the fetus is so bizarre and misshapen that it almost appears as a complex mass. The umbilical cord is often shortened, and the fetus may be fused with the placenta (Figures C and D). The many different potential etiologies of limb–body wall complex include amniotic rupture and vascular infarct with disruption.
Prognosis and Management
The prognosis is uniformly fatal. No karyotypic abnormalities associated with limb–body wall complex have been reported. There is no known recurrent risk of limb–body wall complex.
186

Challenge

187
This page intentionally left blank
CASE 92
A
D
History:  Two  coronal  images  are  presented  of   second­trimester  fetal  heads  as  incidental  ndings  on  routine  ultra­sound scans (Figures A and B).
 1.   What  should  be  included  in  the  differential  diagnosis?  (Choose all that apply.)
  A.   Cystic hygroma   B.   Encephalocele   C.   Strawberry-shaped calvaria   D.   Atrioventricular canal
 2.   Does  the  alpha-fetoprotein  (AFP)  level  help  make  this  diagnosis?
  A.   Yes, it is elevated.   B.   Yes, it is abnormally low.   C.   No, it is normal.   D.   No, it is too variable to be helpful.
 3.   What is Meckel-Gruber syndrome?
  A.   Microcephaly with an occipital meningoencephalocele, 
enlarged kidneys with cystic renal dysplasia, and hepatic 
B
brosis and polydactyly   B.   Macrocephaly   C.   Microcephaly with a frontal meningoencephalocele   D.   Macrocephaly with a frontal meningoencephalocele
 4.   What is the prognosis of  the cases presented?   A.   Very good   B.   Poor   C.   Excellent   D.   Almost certainly fatal
C
189
ANSWERS
CASE 92
Encephalocele
 1.   A and B
 2.   C
 3.   A
 4.   B
References
Goldstein RB, LaPidus AS, Filly RA: Fetal cephaloceles: diagnosis with US. 
Radiology 1991; 180(3):803-808.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1871297 (Accessed on June 20, 2012.)
Khan AN, Turnbull I, MacDonald S, et al: Encephalocele imaging. 2010, 
http://emedicine.medscape.com/.
Article available at http://emedicine.medscape.com/. (Accessed on June 20, 2012.)
Cross-Reference
Ultrasound: The REQUISITES, 2nd ed, pp 390-391, 409-410, 462-463.
Comment
Definition and Description
Encephaloceles  are  midline  cranial  defects  that  occur  in  approximately 1 in 10,000 pregnancies. A cephalocele describes  a herniation of  CNS meninges through the midline defect in  the cranium (Figures A and  B). It results from the  failure of  the surface ectoderm to separate from the neuroectoderm. It  may contain only cerebrospinal uid (cranial meningocele) or  brain and cerebrospinal uid (encephalocele). Both types have  a poor prognosis. The mortality rate of  encephalocele is esti­mated at 50%, and 75% of  the survivors are mentally retarded.  Both types have associated anomalies: CNS (up to 75%), sys­temic (70%), and karyotype (44%).
Location
All encephaloceles except those secondary to  amniotic  band  syndrome  are  midline.  In  the  Western  Hemisphere,  most  encephaloceles  (75%)  occur  in  the  occipital  region, and  the  frontal  and  parietal  locations  constitute  the  remaining 25%.  Frontal  cephaloceles,  more  common  in  the  Eastern  Hemi­sphere, have a better prognosis.
Ultrasound Imaging
The  ultrasound  appearance  of   an  encephalocele  may  be  entirely  cystic  or  solid,  a  cyst-within-a-cyst,  or  cystic  and  solid.  The  cranial defect is present  but  is  not  always  appar­ent.  Secondary  ndings  include  microcephaly,  lemon-head  deformity (30%), beaked tectum (70%), and ventriculomegaly  (50%) (Figure A). Associated CNS anomalies include migra­tional  abnormalities,  agenesis  of   the  corpus  callosum,  and  cerebellar  abnormalities. Meckel-Gruber syndrome  (Figures  B  to  D)  includes  an  occipital  myelomeningocele,  enlarged  fetal kidneys with cystic renal dysplasia, hepatic brosis, and  polydactyly.
Associated Nonneurologic Malformations
Associated nonneurologic  malformations include intrauterine  growth restriction and abnormalities of  amniotic uid volume.  Cardiac anomalies, facial clefts,  and  renal cystic disease have  been  reported.  In  contrast  to  ndings  with  myelomeningo­celes, the AFP level is usually not elevated in encephalocele  because skin covers the anomaly.
190

CASE 93

A
B
C
History: A 24-year-old woman with multiple congenital
anomalies presents from another institution.
1. What should be included in the differential diagnosis given the consolidation of ndings seen in Figures A to C? (Choose all that apply.)
A. Trisomy 21 B. Trisomy 13 C. Trisomy 18 D. VATER association E. Tuberous sclerosis
D
2. In VACTERL association, the C in the acronym refers to what anomaly?
A. Craniofacial abnormalities commonly present, includ-
ing cleft lip/palate B. Cardiac C. Central nervous system anomalies D. Choanal atresia
3. Skeletal anomalies with VACTERL association include all
of the following except: A. Absent or hypoplastic thumbs B. Preaxial polydactyly C. Vertebral abnormalities D. Femoral hypoplasia
4. Which of the following statements concerning the progno-
sis for VATER or VACTERL association is false? A. Most surviving children with VATER or VACTERL
association have delayed development.
B. Overall prognosis for VATER association depends on
the type and severity of underlying defects. C. VACTERL association is usually a sporadic event. D. There is a low risk of VACTERL association in subse-
quent pregnancies.
191
ANSWERS
CASE 93
VATER (VACTERL) Association
1. A, B, C, and D
2. B
3. D
4. A
References
McCauley J, Masand N, McGowan R, et al: X-linked VACTERL with
hydrocephalus syndrome: further delineation of the phenotype caused by FANCB mutations. Am J Med Genet A 2011; 155A(10):2370-2380.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=21910217 (Accessed on June
21, 2012.)
McGahan JP, Leeba JM, Lindfors KK: Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of
VATER association. J Clin Ultrasound 1988; 16(8):588-591.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=3152406 (Accessed on June
21, 2012.) Solomon BD: VACTERL/VATER association. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2011; 6:56.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=21846383 (Accessed on June
21, 2012.)
Cross-Reference
Ultrasound: The REQUISITES, 2nd ed, pp 438, 480.
Comment
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis in this case would be broad. Tri­somies 18 and 13 must be excluded by karyotyping. Trisomy 21 could have some of the features identied in VATER
( vertebral defects, anal atresia, tracheoesophageal stula, radial and renal dysplasia) association. There is a long differential of other, rarer abnormalities that are characterized by vertebral, renal, and radial ray defects. VATER association should be strongly considered in this case.
Ultrasound Findings
VATER association includes vertebral defects, anal atre­sia, tracheoesophageal stula, and radial and renal dysplasia (Figures A and B). VACTERL (vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac anomalies, tracheoesophageal stula, radial and renal dysplasia, limb anomalies) association also includes cardiac and limb anomalies (Figure C). Typical ndings include radial aplasia, hemivertebra, and scoliosis. In this case, there are renal dysplasia, polyhydramnios, and an absent stomach sec­ondary to esophageal atresia with a tracheoesophageal stula. Cardiac anomalies include ventricular septal defect, as in this case (Figure C). Ultrasound obtained after delivery is shown in Figure D.
Prognosis and Management
The overall prognosis of VATER association depends on the type and the severity of the underlying defects. Many of these anomalies, such as anal atresia, can be repaired surgically. More serious anomalies in VATER association, such as hydrocepha­lus, have a less favorable prognosis. Other anomalies, such as radial aplasia or absent thumb, are associated with functional decits. VACTERL association is usually a sporadic event, with a low risk of recurrence.
192

CASE 94

A
B
History: An asymptomatic patient undergoes imaging in
her rst trimester.
1. What is the diagnosis in Figures A to C? A. Cornual ectopic pregnancy B. Cervical ectopic pregnancy C. Heterotopic pregnancy D. Abortion in progress
2. What entity does not cause a gestational sac to appear eccentric?
A. Cornual ectopic pregnancy B. Myoma C. Myometrial contraction D. Ruge-Simon syndrome
C
D
C. A thin hyperechoic line along the long axis of the gesta-
tional sac of the cornual pregnancy
D. A thin hyperechoic line along the short axis of the fal-
lopian tube to the ectopic gestational sac
4. What is the incidence of a cornual ectopic pregnancy? A. The incidence of a cornual pregnancy is 50% of all
ectopic pregnancies.
B. The incidence of a cornual ectopic pregnancy is 20% of
all ectopic pregnancies.
C. The incidence of a cornual ectopic pregnancy is less
than 5% of all ectopic pregnancies.
D. The incidence of a cornual ectopic pregnancy is negli-
gible (<0.1%).
3. What is the interstitial line sign?
A. A thin hyperechoic line extending from the internal cer-
vical os to the periphery of the ectopic cornual gesta­tional sac
B. A thin hyperechoic line extending from the central
endometrial stripe to the periphery of the ectopic cor­nual gestational sac
193
ANSWERS
CASE 94
Cornual (Interstitial) Ectopic Pregnancy
1. A
2. D
3. B
4. C
References
Ackerman TE, Levi CS, Dashefsky SM, et al: Interstitial line: sonographic
nding in interstitial (cornual) ectopic pregnancy. Radiology 1993; 189(1):83-87.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8372223 (Accessed on June 20, 2012.)
Frates MC, Laing FC: Sonographic evaluation of ectopic pregnancy: an
update. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165(2):251-259.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7618535 (Accessed on June 20, 2012.)
Cross-Reference
Ultrasound: The REQUISITES, 2nd ed, pp 358, 359, 362.
Comment
Incidence
An interstitial or cornual ectopic pregnancy is an unusual form of ectopic implantation; it occurs in less than 5% of all ectopic pregnancies.
Ultrasound Imaging
In a cornual ectopic pregnancy, decidual reaction of the endo­metrium lining may occur as seen in Figure A. (See also gures from Case 77: Heterotopic Pregnancy.) The ectopic gestational sac is usually eccentrically located (see Figure B showing a twin gestation and Figure C showing a singleton gestation). Ruge­Simon syndrome refers to the rare occurrence of a cornual ectopic pregnancy that does not appear eccentric because
the uterus has rotated. Uterine anomalies such as septate or bicornuate uterus can also result in an eccentric sac location. Focal myometrial contractions, leiomyomata, and a retroverted uterus result in a similar appearance.
Although some literature suggests that a myometrium less than 5 mm surrounding the sac indicates a cornual ectopic pregnancy, this was found to be an unreliable indicator in one important study. The absence of surrounding myometrium would suggest an interstitial pregnancy; however, the apparent presence of myometrium around the sac does not exclude it. A transvaginal coronal image of a cornual ectopic pregnancy in a third patient shows the apparent myometrium (Figure D). The ectopic pregnancy may be a live fetus or a mass of solid, vascu­larized tissue. The interstitial line sign (Figure D) is a straight, thin hyperechoic line that extends from the endometrium to the ectopically placed gestational sac; it has been reported as an important nding in a cornual ectopic pregnancy. The inter­stitial line is thought to represent either the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube or the endometrial canal. This sign has been shown to be more sensitive than either the eccentric sac location or myometrial thinning in conrming the presence of a cornual ectopic pregnancy.
Prognosis of Undetected Cornual Ectopic Pregnancy
Because of the proximity of the interstitial portion of the tube to the uterine cavity, the diagnosis of a cornual ectopic preg­nancy can be challenging. Patients present later than patients with a typical ectopic pregnancy—as late as the beginning of the second trimester. The cornu is partially protected by the myo­metrium and is capable of expanding more than the remainder of the tube to accommodate an enlarging gestational sac. As a result of this late presentation, a rupture can be catastrophic and can occasionally lead to life-threatening hemorrhage.
194

CASE 95

A
LT = left.
B
History: A 32-year-old woman presents for a routine prena-
tal ultrasound scan.
1. What should be included in the differential diagnosis? (Choose all that apply.)
A. Pulmonary sequestration B. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation C. Congenital high airway obstruction syndrome (CHAOS) D. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia E. Bronchial atresia
2. Which of the following is not an ultrasound nding in a fetus with CHAOS?
A. Fetal ascites B. Deviation of the heart into the right thorax C. Inferior displacement of the diaphragms D. Fluid-lled dilation of the trachea and bronchi
C
Used with permission from Anderson Publishing Ltd. from Hellinger J, et al: Fetal MRI in the third dimension. Appl Radiol 2010; 39[7]:8-19. © Anderson Publishing Ltd.
3. In terms of treatment of CHAOS, which of the following statements is true?
A. Emergency delivery in the second trimester is required. B. There is no effective treatment. C. Ex utero surgery can be successful. D. In utero surgery is not performed.
4. Which of the following is the best explanation for develop­ment of fetal ascites or hydrops with CHAOS?
A. High-output cardiac failure B. Rapid arteriovenous shunting C. Isoimmunization D. Impaired venous return to the heart
195