Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3676_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
386
https://t.me/med1917
T.A. Hameed
size for transcatheter replacement is of critical
importance as a larger than appropriate size may
cause annulus rupture during valve implantation
or a small valve-size may lead to valve
embolization or post-procedure para-valvular
leak. Although echocardiography (including
trans- esophageal technique) and catheter angiography are also used for the assessment of aortic
valve size, CT is able to provide more accurate
estimate of size as the aortic valve annulus is
more commonly oval or elliptical than circular,
which is better evaluated with 3-D capability of
CT imaging compared to 2-D techniques.
CT is also utilized for evaluation of other features of aortic root morphology such as the presence of tri-leaflet versus bicuspid valve, which
may make the procedure challenging for appropriate alignment of the prosthetic valve during
implantation. Assessment of the amount and distribution of calcifications in aortic valve is important as asymmetric distribution or inferior extent
of calcifications into the ventricular outflow tract
may lead to higher risk of post-procedure aortic
valve regurgitation or para-valvular leak. CT
evaluation of the height of coronary artery ostia
from the level of annulus plane and the size of
native valve leaflets is important to assess the risk
of coronary artery occlusion due to displaced
leaflets of native valve or potential superimposition of prosthetic valve. As the CoreValve is longer and extends from the left ventricular outflow
tract (LVOT) to ascending aorta, minimum diameter and height of aortic sinus to accommodate
the valve size is assessed by CT and the size of
ascending aorta and sinotubular junction (STJ) is
evaluated to exclude an aneurysm. CT images of
aortic root are also used to predict appropriate
fluoroscopy tube angle for visualization of aortic
annulus plane for TAVR procedure.
The caliber, calcifications, and tortuosity of
access vessels are assessed by CT for feasibility
of transfemoral or, if necessary, subclavian artery
approach. The amount and irregularity of atherosclerotic plaque or the presence of thrombi in
aortic arch is evaluated for potential risk of cerebral embolization during catheter manipulation.
CT is also used to assess the length of ascending
aorta and calcifications in its wall for feasibility
of direct trans-aortic approach via minithoracotomy as short ascending aorta or large
amount of calcifications may preclude safe
access.

14 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Planning
https://t.me/med1917
387
14.1.1 CT Imaging for Pre-TAVR
Planning
CT angiography (CTA) examination of the thorax,
abdomen, and pelvis is performed. This includes
helical ECG-gated CTA data acquisition of the
thorax in the arterial phase following intravenous
(I.V.) contrast administration (using bolus triggering or timing run in the ascending aorta) for the
assessment of aortic root and thoracic aorta. CTA
examination of the abdomen and pelvis for abdominal aorta and iliofemoral arteries is usually
obtained by a separate helical acquisition without
ECG gating. The total intravenous contrast dose is
variable for the two examinations depending on
the scan duration, usually 100–120 mL.
14.1.2 Image Reconstructions
CT images of chest with ECG synchronization
are reconstructed in the cardiac systolic phase
(20–35% R-R interval) to obtain maximum size
of the aortic valve annulus. The maximum annulus size has been reported to correlate with
images at 20% R-R interval. Using the acquired
dataset, multiplanar reformats and 3-D images
are obtained for pre-procedure assessment of
TAVR (Cases 1–5).
14.1.3 CT Angiography with low
contrast dose
Many patients with severe aortic stenosis
being evaluated for TAVR have comorbidities
including reduced renal function which places
them at high risk of contrast induced nephropathy (CIN). In these patients, CT techniques
can be utilized to reduce their exposure to
iodinated contrast and CTA may be performed
with very small doses of I.V. contrast. The
diagnostic image quality with small contrast
doses is achieved by optimizing different
aspects of CT imaging and higher density of
enhancement is primarily achieved with the
use of 80 Kilovoltage Peak (KVp) technique
as the mean energy of 80
KVp X-ray beam
matches closely with the absorption k-edge of
iodine, thereby producing higher attenuation
for a given concentration and volume of iodinated contrast (Fig. 14.4a, b). Higher image
noise associated with 80 KVp imaging may be
reduced by corresponding increase in tube
current or by the use of newer image reconstruction techniques such as model-based iterative reconstruction (Fig. 14.4c). Timing bolus
run to determine the arrival of contrast in the
aorta is then used to plan for peak contrast
enhancement at the time of imaging. CTA
examination of chest is performed with ECG
synchronization and the imaging can be continued to include abdomen and pelvis with the
same small volume contrast injection or a separate non-gated examination may be obtained
with a second injection of small contrast dose
(Cases 6–8).
(<13 G iodine or less than 35 mL I.V. contrast
with 370 mg/100 mL iodine concentration):
ab c
Fig. 14.4 Attenuation of iodinated contrast with different kilovoltage (a) 120 KVp image (HU) (b) 80 KVp
image with higher attenuation and increased noise (SD)
using hybrid image reconstruction (c) 80 KVp image
(same as b) with reduced noise using model-based image
reconstruction

388
https://t.me/med1917
T.A. Hameed
14.2 Case 1
14.2.1 History
An 88-year-old with severe aortic stenosis for
pre-TAVR evaluation.
14.2.2 Findings
Standard helical cardiac/chest CT imaging with
intravenous contrast dose of 57 mL was performed on a 256-slice scanner with a bolus triggering at 150 HU with ROI in ascending aorta.
Images were reconstructed at 20% and 25% RR
interval. Images in true transverse plane at
select levels demonstrate the size of aortic valve
annulus, sinus of Valsalva, STJ, and LVOT
(Figs. 14.5 and 14.6). Image at the level of
valve leaflets shows tri-leaflet configuration
with moderate calcification. Coronal images
with the left and right coronary arteries in profile at origin show the height of ostia from the
level of aortic annulus (Fig. 14.7). Figure 14.8
shows reference levels for the transaxial
images. The mean diameter of the annulus, and
the effective diameter calculated from perimeter as well as area is 28.6 mm.
Fig. 14.5 Transverse images (left-right) of annulus, sinus of Valsalva, STJ, and LVOT

14 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Planning
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 14.6 Transverse images (left-right) of annulus, sinus of Valsalva, STJ, and LVOT with markings
ab c
389
Fig. 14.7 (a) Axial image of ascending aorta and coronal images (b, c) showing coronary arteries

390
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 14.8 Reference coronal image depicting levels of
transaxial images
14.2.3 Discussion
The size of aortic annulus is measured on true
transverse image which is acquired orthogonal
to the long axis through the aortic annulus by
first obtaining oblique coronal (Fig. 14.9) and
oblique sagittal (Fig. 14.10) images passing
through the center of the annulus. The measurement is made at the level of inferior attachment
of the valve leaflets (Fig. 14.11). The long and
T.A. Hameed
short axis diameters of the annulus are measured at this level to obtain mean diameter.
Effective diameter may be calculated from the
perimeter or by obtaining the area of the lumen
at the level of annulus by planimetry. Since the
annulus is usually oval or elliptical, the diameter derived from area has been shown to match
more closely with the appropriate valve size
selection for the procedure. Similarly, transaxial images are obtained at other levels orthogonal to the long axis derived from oblique sagittal
and coronal images (Figs. 14.12, 14.13, 14.14,
and 14.15). For coronary ostium height from
the annulus, a coronal image passing through
the ostium of coronary artery is obtained using
the transverse image at the level of coronary
artery and the distance is measured from annulus plane (Fig. 14.16, 14.17, 14.18, and 14.19).
During the THV placement, optimal angiographic projections perpendicular to the plane
of native aortic valve are needed. CT can be
used to predict the optimal angiographic angle.
Figures 14.20 and 14.21 show the reference
image of aorta and curve generated by computer software using the annulus plane to predict the appropriate fluoroscopic tube angle
during angiography for TAVR procedure for
projection perpendicular to the valve plane for
appropriate valve positioning thereby reducing
the contrast use and procedure time. This
patient was treated with transfemoral implantation of 29 mm Sapien 3 valve (Fig. 14.22).

14 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Planning
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 14.9 Oblique coronal image to select appropriate
plane for transverse image of aortic annulus
391
Fig. 14.11 Transverse image of aortic annulus derived
from Figs. 14.9 and 14.10
Fig. 14.10 Oblique sagittal image to select appropriate
plane for transverse image of aortic annulus
Fig. 14.12 Transaxial image of sinus of Valsalva

392
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 14.13 Transaxial
image of sinotubular
junction
T.A. Hameed

14 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Planning
https://t.me/med1917
393
Fig. 14.14 Transaxial image of ascending aorta

394
https://t.me/med1917
T.A. Hameed
Fig. 14.15 Transaxial image of aorta at the level of LVOT

14 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Planning
https://t.me/med1917
395
Fig. 14.16 Transaxial image at the level of LMCA
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
