Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3676_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
43 Мб
Скачать
10 Cardiac CTA in the Evaluation of CABG
https://t.me/med1917
275
10.1.4 Clinical CTA Review Postsurgical Coronary
of Revascularization
The CTA review of the surgical revascularized heart consists of evaluation of the native coronary anatomy, the grafts, and the extracoronary struc­tures. The CTA is reviewed on a workstation mul­tiplanar (MPR), curved MPR (MPRc), and 3D volume rendered. A typical approach is com­mencing with a review of the extracoronary struc­tures followed by the native coronary anatomy. The purpose of reviewing the native coronary arteries first is to understand which arteries are diseased and deserve a bypass. It helps to men­tally calculate how many grafts are expected and then proceed to look for them. This systematic approach allows formulation of conclusions that make anatomic sense and are clinically relevant. As an example, in a patient with an intact left ven­tricle, right dominant anatomy where the left main coronary artery and RCA have high- grade obstruction, one would expect to encounter a min­imum of three grafts. In a similar case but with an old large myocardial infarct in the territory of the LAD, there may be only two grafts present, since the infarcted myocardium may not have required revascularization. Thus, a minimum of two grafts would be expected (Fig. 10.1j).
Unfortunately, many times it is not this simple since the surgical technique may have variables such as adequate native distal coronary artery tar­gets, coronary anatomic variants, diseased aorta, combined percutaneous coronary intervention,
and previous surgery. Regardless, it is important to attempt to understand anatomically how the myocardium is receiving blood flow, whether it is compromised, correlates with the other noninva­sive testing, and the patient symptoms.
The native coronary artery proximal to a pat­ent graft is commonly irrelevant since the graft has taken its place in supplying the distal flow. Also, the proximal native segments typically develop accelerated disease and commonly have a heavily calcified and atretic appearance. The grafts are reported individually as to their origin, targeted coronary artery, and whether they are patent or diseased. The description of graft steno­sis may be quantified by a percentage or degree of obstruction.
Disease in the wall of the graft that does not cause obstruction may be termed nonobstructive. High-grade obstruction refers to greater than 70% stenosis. Moderate obstruction refers to 50–70% stenosis and mild obstruction less than 50% stenosis. It is also important to report whether disease is present in the distal anastomo­sis and distal coronary artery runoff.
Grafts are counted by the number of distal anastomosis. As an example, a LIMA to the dis­tal LAD is considered a CABG ×1. A sequential LIMA to the second diagonal and distal LAD is considered a CABG ×2. Adding a sequential vein graft to three obtuse marginal branches would add to CABG ×5 although there are only two sur­gical vascular conduits.
Both the terms, SVG and VG, are used to refer to the saphenous vein graft.
276
https://t.me/med1917
C. Smuclovisky
10.2 Case 1
10.2.1 History
A 78-year-old, asymptomatic male with a history of questionable ischemia in the anterior wall on a nuclear perfusion scintigram presented, with sta­tus post prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) ×3, 5 years previously.
10.2.2 Findings
There is a patent left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft to the distal LAD. There are also two patent vein grafts to the second obtuse mar­ginal (SVG–OM2) and to the posterior descend­ing arteries (SVG–PDA) (Fig. 10.2a–e).
10.2.3 Diagnosis
The diagnosis is multiple patent grafts.
10.2.4 Discussion
CT is an excellent noninvasive study for the eval­uation of coronary postsurgical revascularization. Analysis of the grafts consists of the evaluation of the proximal anastomosis, the body of the graft, the distal anastomosis, and runoff. The grafts generally have an equal luminal diameter throughout. It is common for the grafts to have adjacent surgical clips that may cause significant metal artifact and render a segment of the graft nonevaluable. Grafts are evaluated in the axial plane (source images), curved reformatted recon­struction (cMPR), and volume rendered (VR).
10.2.5 Pearls and Pitfalls
A graft cannot be considered patent unless the full extent of the graft has been evaluated. An excep­tion, in our experience, is surgical clip artifacts in the body of an internal mammary graft since a dis­eased internal mammary artery graft is different from that of a vein graft. For further information, refer to the introduction of this chapter.
10 Cardiac CTA in the Evaluation of CABG
https://t.me/med1917
277
Fig. 10.2 (a, b) Volume rendering: Patent left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to the distal LAD, vein graft (SVG) to OM2, vein graft to the PDA (arrows). (c) cMPR, SVG–OM2, proximal, body, and distal anastomosis (arrows). Adjacent metal surgical clips do not cause sig-
nificant artifact. (d) cMPR, patent LIMA to the distal LAD. Adjacent metal surgical clips do not cause signifi­cant artifact. (e) cMPR, patent SVG–PDA. Adjacent metal surgical clips do not cause significant artifact
278
https://t.me/med1917
C. Smuclovisky
10.3 Case 2
10.3.1 History
A 77-year-old male presented with a history of mitral regurgitation, a chronic inferior wall MI, and status post CABG ×4 in the previous 10 years. The patient complained of increasing shortness of breath. No reversible ischemia was identified on the nuclear stress test.
10.3.2 Findings
There is a sequential vein graft (VG) to OM1 and OM2. The mid-body of the graft is diseased and is subtotally occluded. More distally in the body of the graft, there is also high-grade obstruction (Fig. 10.3a–c). There is a mildly diseased SVG to the posterior descending artery, without flow­limiting stenosis (Fig. 10.3d). There is a patent LIMA graft to the first diagonal artery (Fig. 10.3e). The LAD is short and occluded. There is a large chronic transmural myocardial infarction involving the inferolateral and poste­rior walls of the left ventricle. There is also chronic ischemic changes of the posterior papil­lary muscle (Fig. 10.3e).
10.3.4 Discussion
The CTA clearly demonstrates a subtotally occluded SVG to obtuse marginal arteries. The patient underwent coronary angiography (Fig. 10.3g), with subsequent successful PCI and stenting of the subtotally occluded segment and also the more distal area of high-grade obstruc­tion in the graft (Fig. 10.3h). The initial angio­gram images demonstrated extremely poor flow beyond the subtotally occluded graft segment and nonvisualization of the first anastomosis. Following stenting, there was brisk flow through the graft with good visualization of OM1 and the distal graft anastomosis (Fig. 10.3i, j).
10.3.5 Pearls and Pitfalls
Although contrast density was not well identified on the CTA in the area of critical stenosis in the SVG, it was concluded that it was subtotally occluded since the rest of the graft opacified. When vein grafts thrombose, the most common finding on CTA and coronary angiography is a proximal short stump in the ascending aorta with no distal flow.
10.4 Case 3
10.3.3 Diagnosis
The diagnosis is critically diseased sequential SVG to obtuse marginal arteries.
10.4.1 History
A 50-year-old male presented with a history of atypical chest pain and CABG in the previous
10 Cardiac CTA in the Evaluation of CABG
https://t.me/med1917
279
Fig. 10.3 (a) Volume rendering: Subtotal occlusion in the mid-body of the VG–OM (arrow). (b, c) cMPR, stretch cMPR: SVG–OM, mid-body graft subtotal occlu­sion (proximal arrow). High-grade obstruction in the graft more distally (lower arrow). Proximal to the first stenosis, there is calcification in the wall of the graft. (d) cMPR, VG–PDA. Minimally diseased SVG to the posterior descending artery. The proximal anastomosis has an adja­cent surgical clip artifact (upper arrow). The mid-body of the graft has mild nonobstructive disease (mid-arrow). The distal anastomosis is well identified and free of dis­ease (lower arrow). (e) cMPR, LIMA-D1. Patent internal
mammary artery graft to the first diagonal artery. Ostium of the graft (upper arrow) and distal anastomosis (lower arrow). (f) Axial: Chronic transmural inferolateral and posterior wall MI, with involvement of the posterior papil­lary muscle (arrows), causing dysfunction of the mitral valve apparatus and mitral regurgitation. (g) Coronary angiogram (CA) of the SVG stenosis (arrows). There was sluggish flow with very diminished opacification of the graft beyond the subtotally occluded segment. (h) CA, shortly after stenting demonstrates marked improvement of flow in the graft. (i, j) CA, subsequent good opacifica­tion of OM1 and the distal anastomosis (arrows)
280
https://t.me/med1917
C. Smuclovisky
5 years. The nuclear medicine stress test was equivocal.
10.4.2 Findings
There is a surgical Y graft consisting of a patent LIMA graft to the distal LAD and a patent radial artery graft arising from the LIMA. The radial graft is sequential to obtuse marginal arteries (Fig. 10.4a–d). The RCA is a dominant artery with localized high-grade obstructing calcified plaque in the proximal segment (Fig. 10.4e).
10.4.3 Diagnosis
The diagnosis is patent arterial grafts, with high­grade obstruction in the proximal RCA.
10.4.4 Discussion
The case demonstrates the sole use of arterial grafts and surgically creating a Y anastomosis of
a radial artery from the left internal mammary. The selection of the LIMA to the LAD is pre­ferred since the 10-year patency rate is greater than 95%. The radial arteries are occasionally used as grafts and can be surgically grafted from the ascending aorta, a vein graft, or, as in this case, from the internal mammary artery. Some surgeons elect not to perform this type of Y pro­cedure since it is technically challenging and may compromise the mammary artery at the time of surgery.
10.4.5 Pearls and Pitfalls
It may be difficult to identify the arterial graft anastomosis on the axial view, for which the vol­ume rendered images can prove helpful. The LIMA should not be confused as a single sequen­tial graft to the LAD and obtuse marginal arteries since it does not have the required length.
10 Cardiac CTA in the Evaluation of CABG
https://t.me/med1917
281
Fig. 10.4 (a, b) Volume rendering: Surgical Y graft of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and a radial artery. (c) cMPR: LIMA-radial artery anastomosis (A). (d) cMPR: upper arrow: LIMA; middle arrow: radial artery anastomosis; lower arrow: distal LIMA–LAD
anastomosis. (e) cMPR, RCA: High-grade obstruction in the proximal RCA by calcified plaque (arrow). (f) Angiogram: Surgical arterial Y graft and anastomosis (A). (g) Angiogram, RCA: High-grade obstruction in the proximal RCA (arrow)
282
https://t.me/med1917
C. Smuclovisky
10.5 Case 4
10.5.1 History
A 72-year-old male presented with a history of atypical chest pain and CABG ×2 in the previous 15 years. The nuclear medicine stress test result was negative.
10.5.2 Findings
There is a patent LIMA graft to the distal LAD. There is a diffusely diseased SVG (VG– OM) to the first obtuse marginal artery. The graft has three distinct focal areas of high-grade and critical obstruction (Fig. 10.5a–d).
10.5.3 Diagnosis
The diagnosis is diffusely diseased vein graft (SVG), with high-grade obstruction.
10.5.4 Discussion
The SVG to the obtuse marginal artery has diffuse disease in the walls consisting of mixed mostly calcified plaque. In the body of the graft, there are three distinct areas of high-grade and critical obstruction. There was no obstruction in the prox­imal and distal anastomoses (Fig. 10.5a–c). The patient underwent coronary angiography with stenting of the stenotic segments of the graft (Fig. 10.5e, f) and with good results.
The 10-year patency rate of a vein graft is esti­mated at 50–60%. These develop disease in the wall similar in appearance to that in a native artery and eventually may thrombose and occlude. CTA may easily demonstrate areas of flow-limiting ste­nosis which are amenable to stenting.
10.5.5 Pearls and Pitfalls
The vein grafts usually (not always) have similar caliber from the proximal to distal anastomosis.
Fig. 10.5 (a–c) Volume rendering, cMPR and stretched SVG–OM: Diffusely diseased vein graft with three focal areas of high-grade obstruction (arrows). (d) cMPR:
Patent LIMA–LAD. (e, f) Angiogram: Pre- and post­stenting with good results
10 Cardiac CTA in the Evaluation of CABG
https://t.me/med1917
283
10.6 Case 5
10.6.1 History
A 70-year-old male presented with a history of atrial fibrillation, prostate CA, shortness of breath, previous myocardial infarction (MI), and status post CABG ×3.
10.6.2 Findings
There is a patent sequential LIMA graft to D1 and the distal LAD. There is a patent but mildly atretic RIMA graft to OM1 (Fig. 10.6a–d). There is mild enlargement of the left atrium and left ventricle. There is a large chronic left ventricular transmural anteroseptal and apical myocardial
Fig. 10.6 (a, b) Volume rendering, cMPR: Patent sequen- tial LIMA to D1 and to the distal LAD. Left ventricular anteroseptal and apical MI (arrows). (c, d) Axial and cMPR: Patent mildly atretic RIMA graft to OM1. The RIMA courses posterior to the aortic annulus. There is a
filling defect in the left atrial appendage suggesting a thrombus (arrows). (e) Atrial fibrillation. (f) Anteroseptal and apical LV myocardial infarct (long arrow). Bilateral pleural effusions (PE). Widespread bony blastic metastatic disease from known prostate carcinoma (short arrows)
284
https://t.me/med1917
C. Smuclovisky
infarct. There is a filling defect in the left atrial appendage that is consistent with a thrombus. Additionally, there are large bilateral pleural effusions and widespread blastic metastatic dis­ease to the thoracic spine, rib cage, and sternum (Fig. 10.6f).
10.6.3 Diagnosis
The diagnosis is patent internal mammary arte­rial grafts. Left ventricular failure and wide­spread bony metastatic disease from prostate carcinoma.
10.6.4 Discussion
LIMA jump grafts are usually placed in the territory of the LAD. The right internal mam­mary artery (RIMA) can be grafted to the ter­ritory of the left circumflex by passing it posterior to the aorta (i.e., through the trans­verse sinus), as in this case. The RIMA is placed posterior to the aorta since it is the shortest distance to the territory of the circum­flex and to avoid injury to the artery during a reoperation. Since the patient had atrial fibril­lation (Fig. 10.6e), the study was reconstructed in the 40% phase (end-systole) and obtaining diagnostic images and segmentation of the grafts.
10.6.5 Pearls and Pitfalls
The native position of the internal mammary arteries in the chest wall should be inspected. The absence of an IMA in the expected loca­tion is a clue that the artery may have been sur­gically grafted. Atrial fibrillation is not a contraindication for CTA in our laboratory since we use an adaptive multicycle recon­struction algorithm that corrects for beat-to­beat variability.
10.7 Case 6
10.7.1 History
An 84-year-old male presented with a history of atypical chest pain, LV apical ischemia on a nuclear stress perfusion scintigram, and status post CABG ×4 in the prior 2 years.
10.7.2 Findings
There is a patent LIMA graft to the distal LAD and a vein graft (SVG) to the posterior descend­ing artery. There is a sequential SVG to D1 and OM2 that has high-grade obstruction in the prox­imal segment (Fig. 10.7a–e).
10.7.3 Diagnosis
The diagnosis is high-grade obstruction in the proximal segment of an SVG.
10.7.4 Discussion
Over time, vein grafts become diseased and can develop obstruction. The unusual finding in this case is that the obstruction was present within the first 2 years of the surgery. Note that the CTA dem­onstrates no disease in the wall of the rest of the graft, and the area of stenosis has no calcification or other disease other than the focal luminal narrow­ing, which may suggest an operative complication. When a vein is harvested for grafting, it is important to appropriately handle the graft so as not to cause injury that could later develop stenosis. Pressure injuries, poorly ligated side branches, and kinking or twisting of the vein may cause stenosis. The patient underwent coronary angiography, which confirmed the findings on CTA and was subse­quently stented with excellent results (Fig. 10.7f–h).
10.7.5 Pearls and Pitfalls
A perioperative complication should be consid­ered when a vein graft has focal stenosis without disease in the wall, particularly in the first 5 years of revascularization.