Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5573_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Foreword
- •Foreword
- •Contents of Volume I
- •Contents of Volume II
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.4.3 Acute Stroke
- •1.4.4 CNS Infection
- •1.4.1 Sepsis
- •1.4.2 Acute Encephalopathy
- •1.4.5 Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia
- •1.4.6 Nosocomial Pneumonia
- •1.4.7 Pulmonary Edema
- •1.4.8 Fever
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.4 ECG Nomenclature
- •2.4.1 P Wave
- •2.4.2 PR Interval
- •2.4.3 QRS Complex
- •2.4.4 J Point
- •2.4.5 ST Segment
- •2.4.6 T Wave
- •2.4.7 QT Interval
- •2.4.8 U Wave
- •2.4.9 RR Interval
- •2.5.1 P Wave
- •2.5.1.1 Atrial Arrhythmias
- •Atrial Fibrillation
- •Atrial Flutter
- •Atrial Tachycardia
- •Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia
- •2.5.1.2 Interatrial Blocks
- •Intermittent Interatrial Block (I-IAB)
- •Advanced Interatrial Block (A-IAB)
- •2.5.2 P-QRS Ratio
- •2.5.2.1 Shortened P-QRS Ratio
- •Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome (WPW)
- •Junctional Rhythm
- •Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia (AVNRT)
- •2.5.2.3 Prolonged P-QRS Ratio
- •2.5.3 PR Interval
- •2.5.3.1 Shortened PR Interval
- •2.5.3.2 Prolonged PR Interval
- •2.5.3.3 Second-Degree AV Block
- •Advanced AV Block
- •Third-Degree AV Block (Complete Heart Block)
- •2.5.4 PR Segment
- •2.5.4.1 PR-Segment Elevation
- •2.5.4.2 PR-Segment Depression
- •Acute Pericarditis
- •Acute Myocardial Ischemia
- •2.5.5 Q Waves
- •2.5.6 QRS Complex
- •2.5.6.1 Heart Rate
- •2.5.7 QT Interval
- •2.5.8 ST Segment
- •2.5.8.1 ST-Segment Depression
- •2.5.8.2 ST-Segment Elevation
- •2.5.9 T Waves
- •2.5.9.1 Inverted T Wave
- •2.5.9.2 Flattened T Wave
- •2.5.9.3 Peaked T Wave
- •References
- •Further Reading
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2.2 Nasogastric Tube
- •3.2.3 Central Venous Catheters
- •3.2.4 Cardiac Devices
- •3.2.5 Arterial Catheters
- •3.3 Cardiopulmonary Abnormalities
- •3.3.1 Pulmonary Edema
- •3.3.2 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- •3.3.3 Atelectasis
- •3.3.4 Aspiration
- •3.3.5 Pneumonia
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.5 Modes of Mechanical Ventilation
- •4.5.1 Volume Control Ventilation
- •4.5.2 Pressure Control Ventilation
- •4.5.3 Pressure Support Ventilation
- •4.6 Patient-Ventilator Interactions
- •4.6.1 Trigger Dyssynchrony
- •4.6.2 Flow Dyssynchrony
- •4.6.3 Cycle Dyssynchrony
- •4.9.1 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- •4.9.2 Severe Asthma Exacerbation
- •4.11 Summary
- •5.10 Neuromuscular Blockade
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.3 Pathobiology
- •5.4 ARDS Phenotypes
- •5.5 Lung-Protective Ventilation
- •5.6 Positive End-Expiratory Pressure
- •5.7 Conservative Fluid Management
- •5.8 Moderate-to-Severe ARDS
- •5.9 Prone Positioning
- •5.11 Corticosteroids
- •5.12 Inhaled Pulmonary Vasodilators
- •5.13 Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
- •5.14 Survivorship
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction/Epidemiology
- •6.2 Physiology
- •6.2.2 Physiology During COPD Exacerbation
- •6.4 Pharmacologic Treatment
- •6.4.1 Bronchodilators
- •6.4.1.1 Mechanism
- •6.4.2 Glucocorticoid Therapy
- •6.4.2.1 Mechanism
- •6.4.2.4 Duration
- •6.4.3 Antimicrobials
- •6.4.3.1 Antibiotic Patient Selection
- •6.4.4.1 Nonpharmacologic Interventions
- •6.4.4.2 Opioids
- •6.4.4.3 Benzodiazepines
- •6.4.4.4 Dexmedetomidine
- •6.4.4.5 Ketamine
- •6.4.5 Adjunctive Therapies
- •6.4.5.1 Magnesium
- •6.4.5.3 Vitamin D
- •6.4.5.4 Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
- •6.4.5.5 Smoking Cessation
- •6.4.5.6 Bowel Regimen
- •6.4.5.7 Mucolytics
- •6.4.5.8 Nutrition
- •6.4.5.9 Post-Discharge Adjuncts
- •6.5 ICU-Level Interventions
- •6.5.1 Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation
- •6.5.2 High-Flow Nasal Canula
- •6.5.3 Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
- •6.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 What Is Asthma?
- •7.2 Diagnosis
- •7.2.1 Physical Examination
- •7.2.2 Laboratory Data
- •7.2.3 Radiographic Findings
- •7.3.1 Standard-of-Care Therapy
- •7.3.3 Potential Adjunctive Therapies
- •7.3.3.1 Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICSs)
- •7.3.3.4 Intravenous (IV) Aminophylline
- •7.3.3.5 Intravenous (IV) Beta2-Agonists
- •7.3.3.6 Leukotriene Antagonists (LTRAs)
- •7.3.3.7 Intramuscular (IM) or IV Epinephrine
- •7.3.3.8 Inhaled Anesthetics
- •7.3.3.9 Inhaled Helium-Oxygen (Heliox)
- •7.3.3.10 Intravenous Ketamine
- •7.3.4.1 Subcutaneous (SC) Biologics
- •7.4.1 Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV)
- •7.4.2 Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV)
- •7.6.1 Outpatient Follow-Up
- •7.7 Summary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.1.3.2 Anatomic Location
- •8.1.3.3 Chronicity
- •8.1.4 Clinical Presentation
- •8.1.4.1 Symptoms
- •8.1.4.2 Physician Examination
- •8.1.4.3 Cardiopulmonary Compromise
- •8.2.1.1 Clinical Pretest/Scores
- •8.2.1.2 D-Dimer-Level Interpretations
- •8.2.2 Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA)
- •8.2.3 Mortality Risk Assessment
- •8.2.3.1 PE Severity Index Score
- •8.2.3.2 Prognostic Indicators
- •8.3.2 High-Risk PE
- •8.4 Systemic Thrombolytic Therapy
- •8.4.1.1 High-Risk PE
- •8.4.1.2 Intermediate-Risk PE
- •8.4.1.3 Cardiac Arrest
- •8.5.2 Percutaneous Mechanical Interventions
- •8.5.2.2 Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis
- •8.5.3 Surgical Embolectomy
- •8.5.4 Mechanical Circulatory Support
- •8.6.1 PE Response Team (PERT)
- •8.6.3.1 Renal Dysfunction
- •8.6.3.4 Cancer
- •8.6.3.5 Treatment Failure
- •8.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1.2 ECMO Outcomes
- •9.2 ECMO During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (eCPR)
- •9.2.1 Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal
- •9.3 ECMO Management
- •9.3.3 Fluid Management
- •9.4.1 Coagulation Changes
- •9.4.2 Transfusion Thresholds
- •9.4.3.1 Heparin
- •9.4.3.2 Direct Thrombin Inhibitors
- •9.4.4 Monitoring Anticoagulation
- •9.6.2.1 Opioids
- •9.6.2.2 Ketamine
- •9.6.2.3 Propofol
- •9.6.2.4 Benzodiazepines
- •9.6.2.5 Dexmedetomidine
- •9.7.1 Aminoglycosides
- •9.7.2 Beta-Lactams
- •9.7.4 Antifungals
- •9.9 Other Complications
- •9.9.1 Bleeding
- •9.9.2 Thrombosis
- •9.9.3 Neurologic
- •9.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Type 1–5 Myocardial Infarctions
- •10.2 Acute Coronary Syndrome (Type 1 MI)
- •10.3 Clinical Presentation/Evaluation
- •10.4 Non-pharmacologic Therapy
- •10.5 Pharmacologic Therapy
- •10.5.1 Fibrinolytics
- •10.5.2 Anticoagulants
- •10.5.2.1 Heparins
- •10.5.2.2 Direct Thrombin Inhibitors
- •10.5.3 Antiplatelets
- •10.5.3.1 Aspirin
- •10.5.3.2 P2Y12 Inhibitors
- •Clopidogrel
- •Prasugrel
- •Ticagrelor
- •10.5.3.3 Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors
- •10.5.3.4 Cangrelor
- •10.7 Long-Term Management
- •10.7.1 High Bleed Risk (HBR)
- •10.7.2 Statins
- •10.7.3 Beta-Blockers
- •10.7.5 Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.2 What is Ejection Fraction?
- •11.4 Understanding Blood Pressure
- •11.5 Preload vs. Afterload
- •11.6 Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
- •11.6.2 Etiology
- •11.8 Treating Volume Overload
- •11.8.1 Loop Diuretics
- •11.9 Intravenous Vasodilators
- •11.10 Cardiogenic Shock
- •11.10.1 Inotrope Clinical Pearl
- •11.12 Digoxin
- •11.12.3 Loading Dose
- •11.12.4 Maintenance Dosing
- •11.12.5 Monitoring
- •11.12.7 Distribution
- •11.12.8 Drug-Drug Interactions
- •11.12.9 Digoxin Toxicity
- •11.13 ADHF Clinical Pearls
- •11.13.3 Avoid Phenylephrine
- •11.13.4 Use Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
- •11.14 Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy
- •11.15 Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis
- •11.16 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.3 Diagnostic Findings
- •12.4.1 Oxygen Therapy
- •12.4.2 Pharmacological Management
- •12.4.3 Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS)
- •12.5 Pulmonary Hypertension
- •12.6 The Pharmacist’s Role
- •12.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Atrial Arrhythmias
- •13.2.2 Atrioventricular Blocks
- •13.2.3 Atrial Fibrillation
- •13.2.3.2 Anticoagulation
- •13.2.3.3 Rate vs. Rhythm Control
- •13.2.4 Atrial Flutter
- •13.2.5 Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)
- •13.3 Ventricular Arrhythmias
- •13.3.1 Premature Ventricular Complexes
- •13.3.2 Ventricular Tachycardia
- •13.3.2.1 Torsades de Pointes
- •13.3.3 Ventricular Fibrillation
- •13.3.4 Ventricular Arrhythmia Treatment Strategies
- •13.3.4.1 ICD Implantation
- •13.3.4.2 Pharmacologic Treatments
- •13.3.4.3 Catheter Ablation
- •13.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.3.2 Laboratory Assessment
- •14.3.3 Imaging
- •14.3.4 Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring
- •14.4.1 Distributive
- •14.4.2 Cardiogenic
- •14.4.3 Hypovolemic
- •14.4.4 Obstructive
- •14.5 Management
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Background
- •15.2 Diagnosis
- •15.3 Management
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3 Hemodynamics
- •16.5 Pharmacological Management
- •16.5.1 Hyperosmolar Therapy
- •16.5.3 Barbiturate Coma
- •16.6 Nonpharmacological Treatments
- •16.6.2 Temperature Management
- •16.6.3 Prophylactic Hypothermia
- •16.7 Adjunct Therapies
- •16.7.2 Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis
- •16.7.3 Antibiotic Prophylaxis
- •16.7.4 Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis (SUP)
- •16.7.5 Tranexamic Acid
- •16.7.6 Glucose Targets
- •16.7.7 Steroids
- •16.8 Complications
- •16.8.1 Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity
- •16.8.3 Central Fever
- •16.8.4.1 Diabetes Insipidus
- •16.8.4.3 Cerebral Salt Wasting Syndrome
- •16.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introductory Case
- •17.2 Introduction
- •17.4 Pathophysiology
- •17.5 Acute Therapies
- •17.5.1 Thrombolytic Therapy
- •17.5.2 Thrombectomy
- •17.5.3 Blood Pressure Management
- •17.5.4 Acute Anticoagulation
- •17.5.5 Antiplatelet Therapy
- •17.6 Early Complications
- •17.6.1 Hemorrhagic Conversion
- •17.6.2 Angioedema
- •17.6.3 Malignant Cerebral Edema
- •17.7 Secondary Prevention
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.4 Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
- •18.5 Adverse Drug Effects
- •18.7 Anti-seizure Medications
- •18.7.1 Available Parenteral Preparations
- •18.7.1.1 Benzodiazepines: GABAA Receptor Activation
- •18.7.1.2 Other GABAergic Therapies
- •Barbiturates: GABAergic
- •Phenobarbital
- •Pentobarbital Infusion
- •Propofol Infusion: GABAergic
- •18.7.1.3 Second-Line Non-anesthetic ASMs
- •Levetiracetam: Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2A Binding

466
51. Ahmed N, Wahlgren N, Brainin M, et al. Relationship of blood pressure, antihypertensive therapy, and outcome in ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis: retrospective analysis from safe implementation of thrombolysis in stroke-international stroke
thrombolysis register (SITS-ISTR). Stroke. 2009;40(7):2442–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/
STROKEAHA.109.548602.
52.
Anderson CS, Huang
venous thrombolysis therapy for acute ischaemic stroke (ENCHANTED): an international,
randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10174):877–88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(19)30038- 8.
53.
Zaki HA, Llo
emic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating clinical outcomes through
an emergency medicine paradigm. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e47729. https://doi.org/10.7759/
cureus.47729.
54.
Nam HS, Kim
endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: the OPTIMAL-BP randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;330(9):832–42. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.14590.
55. Todo K.Blood pressure variability in acute ischemic stroke. Hypertens Res. 2024;4:1–2.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440- 023- 01556- 9.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66. Abdul-Rahim AH, Fulton RL, Frank B, etal. Association of improved outcome in acute
67.
, Yin S, Tang L, Zhang X, Zhang S.Nicardipine versus labetalol for hypertension dur-
Hao F
ing acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol India. 2022;70(5):1793–9.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0028- 3886.359214.
Liu-DeRyk
labetalol versus nicardipine for blood pressure management in patients with acute stroke.
Neurocrit Care. 2013;19(1):41–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028- 013- 9863- 9.
Po
spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(1):118–25. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s12028- 018- 0582- 0.
Rosenfeldt Z, Conklen K,
of nicardipine with clevidipine in the management of hypertension in acute cerebrovascular diseases. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(8):2067–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.03.001.
Finger
blood pressure reduction in a neuroscience intensive care population. Neurocrit Care.
2017;26(2):167–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028- 016- 0349- 4.
Ov
1975;6(4):402–4. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.6.4.402.
Fröhlich K, Macha K, Gerner ST
Stroke. 2019;50(7):1682–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025260.
Wang X, Ouyang M, Yang J, Song L, Yang M, Anderson CS. Anticoagulants for acute
ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;2021(10):CD000024. https://doi.
org/10.1002/14651858.CD000024.pub5.
Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, etal. Comparison of the efcacy and safety of new oral
anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial brillation: a meta-analysis of randomised
trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):955–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-
Seif
intracranial hemorrhage and recurrent events. Neurology. 2016;87(18):1856–62. https://doi.
org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003283.
ischaemic stroke patients with atrial brillation who receive early antithrombotic therapy:
analysis from VISTA.Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(7):1048–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12577.
Marchis GMD, Seif
agulants after acute ischaemic stroke linked to atrial brillation: an observational study and
e X, Levy PD, Parker D, Coplin W, Rhoney DH. A prospective evaluation of
yant JO, Kuper PJ, Mara KC, etal. Nicardipine reduces blood pressure variability after
JR, Kurczewski LM, Brophy GM. Clevidipine versus nicardipine for acute
ergaard J, Skinhøj E.A paradoxical cerebral hemodynamic effect of hydralazine. Stroke.
fge DJ, Traenka C, Polymeris A, etal. Early start of DOAC after ischemic stroke: risk of
Y, Lindley RI, et al. Intensive blood pressure reduction with intra-
yd SA, Elmoheen A, et al. Antihypertensive interventions in acute isch-
YD, Heo J, et al. Intensive vs conventional blood pressure lowering after
Jones B, Ferrill D, Deshpande M, Siddiqui FM. Comparison
, etal. Angioedema in stroke patients with thrombolysis.
fge DJ, Schaedelin S, etal. Early versus late start of direct oral antico-
B. Barlow et al.
6736(13)62343- 0.

Acute Ischemic Stroke
17
individual patient data pooled analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022;93(2):119–25.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp- 2021- 327236.
68. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, etal. EHRA practical guide on the use of new oral
anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial brillation: executive summary. Eur Heart
J. 2013;34(27):2094–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht134.
69.
Fischer U, K
brillation. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(26):2411–21. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2303048.
70.
Jiang M,
ischemic stroke in patients with atrial brillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023;56(4):603–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239- 023- 02872- 0.
71.
Chen ZM.
with acute ischaemic strok
S0140- 6736(97)04010- 5.
72.
The international strok
neither among 19 435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1997;349(9065):1569–81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(97)04011- 7.
73. Johnston SC, Amarenco P, Denison H, et al. Ticagrelor and aspirin or aspirin alone in
acute ischemic stroke or TIA.N Engl J Med. 2020;383(3):207–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa1916870.
74.
Diener
clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in highrisk patients (MA
2004;364(9431):331–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(04)16721- 4.
75.
Bhatt DL,
prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(16):1706–17. https://doi.
org/10.1056/NEJMoa060989.
Effect of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with atrial brillation. N Engl J Med.
76.
2009;360(20):2066–78. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0901301.
77.
Markus HS, Droste D
in symptomatic carotid stenosis evaluated using doppler embolic signal detection: the clopidogrel and aspirin for reduction of emboli in symptomatic carotid stenosis (CARESS) trial.
Circulation. 2005;111(17):2233–40. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000163561.90680.1C.
Kennedy J, Hill MD, Ryckborst KJ, Eliasziw M, Demchuk AM, Buchan AM. Fast assess-
78.
ment of stroke and transient ischaemic attack to prevent early recurrence (FASTER): a randomised controlled pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(11):961–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S1474- 4422(07)70250- 8.
79.
Wong KSL, Chen C, Fu J, etal. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for reducing
embolisation in patients with acute symptomatic cerebral or carotid artery stenosis (CLAIR
study): a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(5):489–97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474- 4422(10)70060- 0.
80.
Amarenco P
emic attack or minor stroke. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(16):1533–42. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa1412981.
ang Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, etal. Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient
81.
W
ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(1):11–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1215340.
82.
Johnston SC, Easton JD, F
stroke and high-risk TIA. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(3):215–25. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa1800410.
83. Wang Y, Meng X, Wang A, etal. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in CYP2C19 loss-of-function
carriers with stroke or TIA.N Engl J Med. 2021;385(27):2520–30. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa2111749.
84.
Gao
N Engl J Med. 2023;389(26):2413–24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2309137.
oga M, Strbian D, etal. Early versus later anticoagulation for stroke with atrial
Wang C, Zhang Y.Comparison of early and delayed anticoagulation therapy after
CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20
e. Lancet. 1997;349(9066):1641–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/
e trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or
HC, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with
TCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet.
Fox KAA, Hacke W, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the
W, Kaps M, etal. Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin
, Lavallée PC, Labreuche J, etal. One-year risk of stroke after transient isch-
arrant M, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin in acute ischemic
Y, Chen W, Pan Y, etal. Dual antiplatelet treatment up to 72 hours after ischemic stroke.
467
000 patients

468
85. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, etal. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for
intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa1105335.
86.
De Matteis E, De Santis F
actual practice in use of dual antiplatelet therapy after transient ischemic attack and minor
stroke. Stroke. 2023;54(5):1172–81. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.041660.
87.
Chen HS, Cui
minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke: the ARAMIS randomized clinical trial.
JAMA. 2023;329(24):2135–44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.7827.
88.
Larrue
ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28(5):957–60. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.5.957.
89. von Kummer R, Broderick JP, Campbell BCV, etal. The Heidelberg bleeding classication.
Stroke. 2015;46(10):2981–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010049.
90.
Molina
tion: a marker of early reperfusion, reduced infarct size, and improved outcome in patients
with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 2002;33(6):1551–6. https://doi.
org/10.1161/01.STR.0000016323.13456.E5.
91. Yaghi S, Willey JZ, Cucchiara B, etal. Treatment and outcome of hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: a scientic statement for healthcare
professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke.
2017;48(12):e343–61. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000152.
ahlgren N, Ahmed N, Dávalos A, etal. Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic
92.
W
stroke in the safe implementation of thrombolysis in stroke-monitoring study (SITSMOST): an observ
S0140- 6736(07)60149- 4.
93.
Guhwe
tomography brain scan is not useful in stable patients post intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(3):540–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.11.006.
Tanswell P, Seifried E, Su PCAF, Feuerer W, Rijken DC. Pharmacokinetics and systemic
94.
effects of tissue-type plasminogen activator in normal subjects. Clin Pharmacol Therap.
1989;46(2):155–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1989.120.
95.
Cannon CP
with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;98(25):2805–14.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.98.25.2805.
aghi S, Boehme AK, Dibu J, etal. Treatment and outcome of thrombolysis-related hem-
96.
Y
orrhage: a multicenter retrospective study. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(12):1451–7. https://doi.
org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2371.
erkerk BS, Lesch C, Cham S, Berger K. Cryoprecipitate for alteplase-related hemor-
97.
V
rhagic conversion of acute ischemic stroke. J Pharm Pract. 2023;36(5):1253–9. https://doi.
org/10.1177/08971900221102116.
98.
Barra ME, Feske SK, Sylvester KW, et al. Fibrinogen concentrate for the treatment of
thrombolysisHemost. 2020;26:1076029620951867. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029620951867.
99.
French KF
after thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17(1):107–11.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-
100.
Rosao F, Vandelli L, Bigliardi G, et al. Usefulness of thromboelastography in the
detection and management of tissue plasminogen activator-associated hyperbrinolysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(2):e29–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.10.039.
101.
Hailu K, Ragoonanan D, Da
rhagic conversion following administration of tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke. Am J
Emerg Med. 2022;59:216.e1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.022.
Y, Zhou ZH, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy vs alteplase for patients with
V, von Kummer R, del Zoppo G, Bluhmki E.Hemorrhagic transformation in acute
CA, Alvarez-Sabín J, Montaner J, etal. Thrombolysis-related hemorrhagic infarc-
M, Utley-Smith Q, Blessing R, Goldstein LB. Routine 24-hour computed
, Gibson CM, McCabe CH, etal. TNK–tissue plasminogen activator compared
associated hemorrhage in adult ischemic strok
, White J, Hoesch RE.Treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage with tranexamic acid
, Ornello R, etal. Divergence between clinical trial evidence and
ational study. Lancet. 2007;369(9558):275–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/
e patients. Clin Appl Thromb
012- 9681- 5.
vis H.Tranexamic acid for treatment of symptomatic hemor-
B. Barlow et al.

cute Ischemic Stroke
17
A
102. Verkerk BS, Berger K, Lesch CA.Aminocaproic acid for the reversal of alteplase: a case
series. J Pharm Pract. 2020;33(6):919–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190019840095.
103. Ma L, Hu X, Song L, etal. The third intensive care bundle with blood pressure reduction
in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT3): an international, stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023;402(10395):27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0140- 6736(23)00806- 1.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108. Mas-Serrano M, García-Pastor A, Iglesias-Mohedano AM, etal. Related factors with orolin-
109.
110.
Vigneron C, Lécluse A, Ronzière T, etal. Angioedema associated with thrombolysis for isch-
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
Pahs L, Droege C, Kneale H, Pancioli A. A novel approach to the treatment of orolin-
116.
117.
118.
T, Bäck O.Elevated plasmin-alpha 2-antiplasmin complex levels in hereditary angio-
Nilsson
edema: evidence for the invivo efciency of the intrinsic brinolytic system. Thromb Res.
1985;40(6):817–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049- 3848(85)90318- 4.
Molinaro G, Gerv
binant tissue plasminogen activator treatment: an invitro experimental approach. Stroke.
2002;33(6):1712–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000017284.77838.87.
ate JE, Kalimullah EA, Wijdicks EFM.Angioedema after tPA: what neurointensivists
Fug
should know. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16(3):440–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028- 012- 9678- 0.
erner R, Keller M, Woehrle JC. Facial angioedema and stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis.
W
2014;38(2):101–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365205.
gual angioedema after intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: results from a singlecenter cohort and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(1):441–52.
s10072- 021- 05279- y.
AC, Eaton A, Melles RB, etal. Comparative safety of tenecteplase vs alteplase for acute
Flint
ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023;33(1):107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107468.
oubou A, Philippeau F, Derex L, etal. Audit report and systematic review of orolingual
Lek
angioedema in post-acute stroke thrombolysis. Neurol Res. 2014;36(7):687–94. https://doi.
org/10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000302.
emic stroke: analysis of a case-control study. J Intern Med. 2019;286(6):702–10. https://doi.
org/10.1111/joim.12962.
C, Cantier M, Rodriguez-Régent C, Gout O, Obadia M.Orolingual and abdominal
Benoit
angioedema post thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Neurology. 2018;90(3):140–1. https://doi.
org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004834.
wn E, Campana C, Zimmerman J, Brooks S. Icatibant for the treatment of orolingual
Bro
angioedema following the administration of tissue plasminogen activator. Am J Emerg Med.
2018;36(6):1125.e1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.018.
E, Dodd L, Smith W, Kleinig T.Icatibant as a potential treatment of life-threatening
Cheong
alteplase-induced angioedema. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(2):e36–7. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.039.
ollmach AD, Zehnder D, Schwendinger M, Tarnutzer AA. Unilateral orolingual angio-
W
edema in a patient with sarcoidosis after intravenous thrombolysis due to acute stroke without
improvement after treatment with icatibant. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13(12):e236643. https://
doi.org/10.1136/bcr-
gual angioedema after tissue plasminogen activator administration. Ann Emerg Med.
2016;68(3):345–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.02.019.
Martinez Manzano JM, Lo KB, P
venous tranexamic acid for patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor–induced
angioedema: a case series. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021;126(6):725–6. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.anai.2021.02.011.
Hasara S,
angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema. Cureus. 2021;13(9):e18116.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18116.
ais N, Adam A.Biochemical basis of angioedema associated with recom-
https://doi.org/10.1007/
2020- 236643.
atarroyo-Aponte G, Azmaiparashvili Z.The use of intra-
Wilson K, Amatea J, Anderson J.Tranexamic acid for the emergency treatment of
469

470
119. Thorén M, Azevedo E, Dawson J, etal. Predictors for cerebral edema in acute ischemic stroke
treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke. 2017;48(9):2464–71. https://doi.org/10.1161/
STROKEAHA.117.018223.
120.
121. Wijdicks EFM, Sheth KN, Carter BS, et al. Recommendations for the management of
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
129.
130.
131.
132.
133.
e W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R. “Malignant”
Hack
middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol.
1996;53(4):309–15. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1996.00550040037012.
cerebral and cerebellar infarction with swelling. Stroke. 2014;45(4):1222–38. https://doi.
org/10.1161/01.str.0000441965.15164.d6.
AM, Morgan Jones G, Hawryluk GWJ, etal. Guidelines for the acute treatment of
Cook
cerebral edema in neurocritical care patients. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32(3):647–66. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s12028- 020- 00959- 7.
oenig MA, Bryan M, Lewin JL, Mirski MA, Geocadin RG, Stevens RD.Reversal of trans-
K
tentorial herniation with hypertonic saline. Neurology. 2008;70(13):1023–9. https://doi.
org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000304042.05557.60.
ideen TO, Zazulia AR, Manno EM, et al. Mannitol bolus preferentially shrinks non-
V
infarcted brain in patients with ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2001;57(11):2120–2. https://doi.
org/10.1212/WNL.57.11.2120.
Reinink H, Jüttler E, Hack
infarction: a systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis of randomized clinical
trials. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(2):208–16. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3745.
wer A, Mulcahy M, Maharaj M, et al. Surgical decompression for malignant cere-
Do
bral oedema after ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;11 https://doi.
org/10.1002/14651858.CD014989.pub2.
Brondani R, Garcia de
epilepsy after decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery stroke.
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2017;7(1):51–61. https://doi.org/10.1159/000458730.
Yeap MC, Chen CC, Liu ZH, etal. Postcranioplasty seizures following decompressive crani-
ectomy and seizure prophylaxis: a retrospective analysis at a single institution. J Neurosurg.
2018;131(3):936–40. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.4.JNS172519.
Franco AC, Fernandes T, Peralta AR, etal. Frequency of epileptic seizures in patients under-
going decompressive craniectomy after ischemic stroke. Seizure. 2022;101:60–6. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.seizure.2022.07.011.
ey GJ. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for stroke prevention. Stroke.
Hank
2003;34(2):354–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000054261.97525.4B.
Chen J, Li S, Zheng K, et
Assoc. 2019;8(8):e011696. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.011696.
Parikh NS, Omran SS, Kamel H, Elkind MSV, Willey J.Smoking-cessation pharmacotherapy
for patients with stroke and TIA: systematic review. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;78:236–41. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.04.026.
in Y, Zhang L, Marshall I, Wolfe C, Wang Y.Statin therapy for preventing recurrent stroke
Y
in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized
controlled trials and observational cohort studies. Neuroepidemiology. 2022;56(4):240–9.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000525672.
e W, etal. Surgical decompression for space-occupying hemispheric
Almeida A, Abrahim Cherubini P, etal. High risk of seizures and
al. Impact of smoking status on stroke recurrence. J Am Heart
B. Barlow et al.

Chapter 18
Status Epilepticus andRefractory Status
Epilepticus
MorganTrammel, CinaSasannejad, BeverlyTomita,
andCheryleeW.J.Chang
18.1 Introduction
In neurocritical care, a critical care pharmacist brings added expertise when well
versed in cerebral pathophysiology, nuances of neuropathology, updated or newly
established guidelines, and emerging neuro-pharmacotherapeutics [1, 2]. This
specialty- specic knowledge includes strategies for prophylaxis or management of
seizures or status epilepticus (SE). SE was redened by the International League
Against Epilepsy (ILAE) in 2015 as “a condition resulting either from the failure of the
mechanisms responsible for seizure termination or from the initiation of mechanisms
which lead to abnormally prolonged seizures (after time point t1).” It is a condition that
can have long-term consequences (after time point t2), including neuronal death, neuronal injury, and alteration of neuronal networks, depending on the type and duration
of seizures [3]. The intent is to utilize the operational time points to determine when
treatment should be considered or started (time point t1, which the ILAE dened as
5min) and to utilize time point t2 (dened as 30min) to determine the aggressiveness
M. Trammel
Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Hospital, Durham, USA
C. Sasannejad
Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
B. Tomita
Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
C. W. J. Chang (
Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
Department of Medicine Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University
School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
e-mail: Cherylee.Chang@duke.edu
Switzerland AG 2025
Y. Alzaidi, M. A. Gebily (eds.), The Pharmacist’s Expanded Role in Critical
Care Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77335-8_18
*)
471© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature

472
M. Trammel et al.
of treatment to prevent long-term consequences, e.g., neuronal injury or death.
Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is dened as intractable seizures unresponsive to a
rst-line anti-seizure medication (ASM), i.e., initial benzodiazepine (BZP), and an
adequate second-line ASM, e.g., a full loading dose of an intravenous (IV) ASM.Superrefractory SE (SRSE) is dened as RSE that continues or recurs 24h or longer despite
the initiation of IV anesthetic agents [4, 5]. Even more recently, consensus denitions
to standardize terminology to facilitate communication for clinical care and research
include (1) new-onset RSE (NORSE), which is a clinical presentation in a patient
without known epilepsy or preexisting relevant neurological disorder or clear structural, toxic, or metabolic etiology; (2) febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome
(FIRES) as a subcategory of NORSE that requires a prior febrile infection between
24h and 2weeks prior to the onset of RSE; (3) prolonged RSE (PRSE), which is RSE
that lasts for at least 7days despite appropriate management, but without the use of
anesthetics; and (4) prolonged SRSE (PSRSE), which is SRSE that persists for at least
7days including the ongoing need for anesthetics [6] (Table18.1).
Table 18.1 Nomenclature and denitions of status epilepticus [3, 4, 6]
Potential
for
secondary
injury
Variable
Variable
Moderate
High
High
Denition Time course
Status
epilepticus (SE)
Nonconvulsive
SE (NCSE)
Refractory SE
(RSE)
Prolonged RSE
(PRSE)
Super refractory
SE (SRSE)
Prolonged
SRSE (PSRSE)
NORSE New-onset RSE in a patient
FIRES NORSE with febrile infection
Abnormally prolonged
seizures that can have
long-term consequences if not
treated depending on seizure
type and duration
Electrographic seizures
without overt
symptomatology other than
decreased LOC
Intractable seizures
unresponsive to a rst-line
ASM
RSE lasting 7+ days despite
appropriate management
without the use of anesthetics
RSE continuing or recurring
24h+ despite the initiation of
IV anesthetic agents
SRSE persisting 7+ days
including ongoing need for IV
anesthetic agents
without known epilepsy or
preexisting relevant neurological
disorder or clear structural,
toxic, or metabolic etiology
24h to 2weeks prior to onset
of RSE
IV
anesthetic
use
5–30+min May be
5–30+min May be
30min–24h with
anesthetics;
30min–7days
without anesthetics
7+ days No High
24+h Yes High
7+ days Ye s High
Variable May be
Variable May be
required
required
May be
required
required
required

18 Status Epilepticus andRefractory Status Epilepticus
473
In a patient, the clinical signs and symptoms or semiology of the seizures may
change over time in SE; however, it has been established that nonconvulsive seizures (NCSz) and NCSE, i.e., electrographic ictal activity without overt motor
symptomatology except a decreased level of consciousness (LOC), can cause secondary neuronal injury [7]. Electroencephalography (EEG) is an important tool to
detect occult NCSz and NCSE in the ICU since patients are frequently mechanically ventilated and sedated without obvious convulsive activity [8].
Depending on the cohort, SE has been associated with 30-day mortality varying
between 8.5% and 31% [9, 10]. In the United States, a nationwide cohort of 33,814
patients showed a higher 30-day mortality in adults (10.2%) than in children (1.8%).
The combined 1-year mortality was 25.1% (30.3% in adults and 4.6% in children);
however, neurologic disability was highest in children aged 5–9years (21.3%) [9]. In
this cohort, prognostic factors for both 30-day and 1-year mortality included older age,
no active (recent) history of epilepsy, presence of an acute etiology, and refractoriness
of SE.Other studies also found that older age, duration, and NCSE were associated
with new neurological decits, which predicted worse 2-year survival [11]. In one
German cohort of 2585 patients with SE, discharge mortality increased from 9.6% in
non-refractory SE to 15.0% (p<0.001) in RSE and 39.9% (p<0.001) in SRSE [12].
These factors highlight the importance of terminating SE as quickly as possible.
After reviewing the cellular pathophysiology of SE, which informs the basis for
pharmacotherapeutic modalities, this chapter provides a compendium of the most
recent and commonly utilized ASM in SE and caveats and indications of use and
explores novel methods for treatment.
18.2 Cellular Pathophysiology ofStatus Epilepticus
Typically fueled by an underlying etiology, when seizures persist, N-methyl-Daspartate (NMD
glutaminergic excitotoxicity coincides with the internalization of γ-aminobutyric acid
(GABA)
GABAergic activity. The loss of inhibition, coupled with synaptic excitation, decreases
not only the likelihood of spontaneous termination but also the likelihood that
GABAergic medications such as BZPs and barbiturates will be effective to terminate
seizures in SE and may explain the therapeutic efcacy of NMDA antagonists in SE
[14, 15]. Increased NMDA receptor activity results in excessive intraneuronal calcium
entry with activation of nitric oxide synthase, calpains, and NADPH oxidase with reactive oxygen species causing oxidative stress. This results in widespread damage to
DNA, proteins, and lipids followed by neuroinammation and neuronal death.
Increased calcium accumulation results in mitochondrial failure due to changes in the
membrane potential with opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore,
followed by decrease in ATP production, mitochondrial swelling, and apoptosis [5, 16].
Understanding the mechanistic changes to receptors, the effect on neurotransmitters, and the cascade of injury may help tailor appropriate and timely therapy
to prevent neuronal injury, death, and cognitive decline after SE (Figs. 18.1
and 18.2).
A) receptors accumulate in the synapse [13]. Subsequent enhanced
receptors, producing a functional decrease in the synaptic inhibitory
A

474
M. Trammel et al.
Fig. 18.1 Location of the mechanism of action of anti-seizure medications (Reproduced with
permission from Löscher W, Klein P.The Pharmacology and Clinical Efcacy of Anti-seizure
Medications: From Bromide Salts to Cenobamate and Beyond. CNS Drugs 2021;35:935–63 [17]).
Asterisks indicate multiple mechanisms of action (MOA), although only the primary MOA is
shown in the gure. AMPA ⍺-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid, Ca
−
cium, Cl
transporter 1, K
chloride, GABA γ-aminobutyric acid, GABA-T GABA aminotransferase, GAT-1 GABA
+
potassium, KCNQ Kv7 potassium channel family, Na+ sodium, NMDA N-methyl-
2+
cal-
-aspartate, SV2A synaptic vesicle protein 2A

S
18
tatus Epilepticus andRefractory Status Epilepticus
475
Fig. 18.2 The timeline of available anti-seizure medications (Reproduced with permission from
Löscher W, Klein P.The Pharmacology and Clinical Efcacy of Anti-seizure Medications: From
Bromide Salts to Cenobamate and Beyond. CNS Drugs 2021;35:935–63 [17])
18.3 Pharmacokinetics andDrug-Drug Interactions
A distinctive role for the pharmacist in the management of patients with SE involves
understanding key principles of absorption and lipo- or hydrophilicity, which affect
the volume of distribution (Vd), central nervous system (CNS) penetration, metabolism, and elimination of each ASM.Especially salient are (1) protein-binding properties that result in competition for binding sites on albumin and (2) induction or
inhibition of hepatic enzymes. These properties can result in signicant drug-drug
interactions (DDIs) [18]. Careful consideration should also be given when contemplating initiation, increase, decrease, or discontinuation of a medication that is a
known inducer or inhibitor of enzymes. Similarly, adding a medication to known
inducers or inhibitors should be carefully evaluated. It is beyond the scope of this
chapter to review all DDIs; however, there are many electronic databases and online
applications that are readily available to assess these interactions.
Most ASMs are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 system in the liver by
Cytochrome P450 enzymes have broad substrate specicity; therefore, a single drug
may be a substrate for multiple enzymes, such as CYP3A4, 2CP9, and 2C19.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
