Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5573_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
48 Мб
Скачать
466
51. Ahmed N, Wahlgren N, Brainin M, et al. Relationship of blood pressure, antihyperten­sive therapy, and outcome in ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis: retro­spective analysis from safe implementation of thrombolysis in stroke-international stroke thrombolysis register (SITS-ISTR). Stroke. 2009;40(7):2442–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/
STROKEAHA.109.548602.
52.
Anderson CS, Huang venous thrombolysis therapy for acute ischaemic stroke (ENCHANTED): an international, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10174):877–88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(19)30038- 8.
53.
Zaki HA, Llo emic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating clinical outcomes through an emergency medicine paradigm. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e47729. https://doi.org/10.7759/
cureus.47729.
54.
Nam HS, Kim endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: the OPTIMAL-BP randomized clini­cal trial. JAMA. 2023;330(9):832–42. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.14590.
55. Todo K.Blood pressure variability in acute ischemic stroke. Hypertens Res. 2024;4:1–2.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440- 023- 01556- 9.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66. Abdul-Rahim AH, Fulton RL, Frank B, etal. Association of improved outcome in acute
67.
, Yin S, Tang L, Zhang X, Zhang S.Nicardipine versus labetalol for hypertension dur-
Hao F ing acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol India. 2022;70(5):1793–9.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0028- 3886.359214.
Liu-DeRyk labetalol versus nicardipine for blood pressure management in patients with acute stroke. Neurocrit Care. 2013;19(1):41–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028- 013- 9863- 9. Po spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(1):118–25. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s12028- 018- 0582- 0.
Rosenfeldt Z, Conklen K, of nicardipine with clevidipine in the management of hypertension in acute cerebrovas­cular diseases. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(8):2067–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.03.001.
Finger blood pressure reduction in a neuroscience intensive care population. Neurocrit Care. 2017;26(2):167–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028- 016- 0349- 4. Ov 1975;6(4):402–4. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.6.4.402. Fröhlich K, Macha K, Gerner ST Stroke. 2019;50(7):1682–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025260.
Wang X, Ouyang M, Yang J, Song L, Yang M, Anderson CS. Anticoagulants for acute
ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;2021(10):CD000024. https://doi.
org/10.1002/14651858.CD000024.pub5.
Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, etal. Comparison of the efcacy and safety of new oral
anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial brillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):955–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- Seif intracranial hemorrhage and recurrent events. Neurology. 2016;87(18):1856–62. https://doi.
org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003283.
ischaemic stroke patients with atrial brillation who receive early antithrombotic therapy: analysis from VISTA.Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(7):1048–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12577. Marchis GMD, Seif agulants after acute ischaemic stroke linked to atrial brillation: an observational study and
e X, Levy PD, Parker D, Coplin W, Rhoney DH. A prospective evaluation of
yant JO, Kuper PJ, Mara KC, etal. Nicardipine reduces blood pressure variability after
JR, Kurczewski LM, Brophy GM. Clevidipine versus nicardipine for acute
ergaard J, Skinhøj E.A paradoxical cerebral hemodynamic effect of hydralazine. Stroke.
fge DJ, Traenka C, Polymeris A, etal. Early start of DOAC after ischemic stroke: risk of
Y, Lindley RI, et al. Intensive blood pressure reduction with intra-
yd SA, Elmoheen A, et al. Antihypertensive interventions in acute isch-
YD, Heo J, et al. Intensive vs conventional blood pressure lowering after
Jones B, Ferrill D, Deshpande M, Siddiqui FM. Comparison
, etal. Angioedema in stroke patients with thrombolysis.
fge DJ, Schaedelin S, etal. Early versus late start of direct oral antico-
B. Barlow et al.
6736(13)62343- 0.
Acute Ischemic Stroke
17
individual patient data pooled analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022;93(2):119–25.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp- 2021- 327236.
68. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, etal. EHRA practical guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial brillation: executive summary. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(27):2094–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht134.
69.
Fischer U, K brillation. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(26):2411–21. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2303048.
70.
Jiang M, ischemic stroke in patients with atrial brillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023;56(4):603–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239- 023- 02872- 0.
71.
Chen ZM. with acute ischaemic strok
S0140- 6736(97)04010- 5.
72.
The international strok neither among 19 435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1997;349(9065):1569–81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(97)04011- 7.
73. Johnston SC, Amarenco P, Denison H, et al. Ticagrelor and aspirin or aspirin alone in acute ischemic stroke or TIA.N Engl J Med. 2020;383(3):207–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa1916870.
74.
Diener clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high­risk patients (MA 2004;364(9431):331–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(04)16721- 4.
75.
Bhatt DL, prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(16):1706–17. https://doi.
org/10.1056/NEJMoa060989.
Effect of clopidogrel added to aspirin in patients with atrial brillation. N Engl J Med.
76. 2009;360(20):2066–78. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0901301.
77.
Markus HS, Droste D in symptomatic carotid stenosis evaluated using doppler embolic signal detection: the clopi­dogrel and aspirin for reduction of emboli in symptomatic carotid stenosis (CARESS) trial. Circulation. 2005;111(17):2233–40. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000163561.90680.1C.
Kennedy J, Hill MD, Ryckborst KJ, Eliasziw M, Demchuk AM, Buchan AM. Fast assess-
78. ment of stroke and transient ischaemic attack to prevent early recurrence (FASTER): a ran­domised controlled pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(11):961–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S1474- 4422(07)70250- 8.
79.
Wong KSL, Chen C, Fu J, etal. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for reducing
embolisation in patients with acute symptomatic cerebral or carotid artery stenosis (CLAIR study): a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(5):489–97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474- 4422(10)70060- 0.
80.
Amarenco P emic attack or minor stroke. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(16):1533–42. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa1412981.
ang Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, etal. Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient
81.
W ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(1):11–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1215340.
82.
Johnston SC, Easton JD, F stroke and high-risk TIA. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(3):215–25. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa1800410.
83. Wang Y, Meng X, Wang A, etal. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers with stroke or TIA.N Engl J Med. 2021;385(27):2520–30. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa2111749.
84.
Gao N Engl J Med. 2023;389(26):2413–24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2309137.
oga M, Strbian D, etal. Early versus later anticoagulation for stroke with atrial
Wang C, Zhang Y.Comparison of early and delayed anticoagulation therapy after
CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20
e. Lancet. 1997;349(9066):1641–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/
e trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or
HC, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with
TCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet.
Fox KAA, Hacke W, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the
W, Kaps M, etal. Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin
, Lavallée PC, Labreuche J, etal. One-year risk of stroke after transient isch-
arrant M, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin in acute ischemic
Y, Chen W, Pan Y, etal. Dual antiplatelet treatment up to 72 hours after ischemic stroke.
467
000 patients
468
85. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, etal. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa1105335.
86.
De Matteis E, De Santis F actual practice in use of dual antiplatelet therapy after transient ischemic attack and minor stroke. Stroke. 2023;54(5):1172–81. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.041660.
87.
Chen HS, Cui minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke: the ARAMIS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;329(24):2135–44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.7827.
88.
Larrue ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28(5):957–60. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.5.957.
89. von Kummer R, Broderick JP, Campbell BCV, etal. The Heidelberg bleeding classication. Stroke. 2015;46(10):2981–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010049.
90.
Molina tion: a marker of early reperfusion, reduced infarct size, and improved outcome in patients with proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 2002;33(6):1551–6. https://doi.
org/10.1161/01.STR.0000016323.13456.E5.
91. Yaghi S, Willey JZ, Cucchiara B, etal. Treatment and outcome of hemorrhagic transforma­tion after intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: a scientic statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017;48(12):e343–61. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000152.
ahlgren N, Ahmed N, Dávalos A, etal. Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic
92.
W stroke in the safe implementation of thrombolysis in stroke-monitoring study (SITS­MOST): an observ
S0140- 6736(07)60149- 4.
93.
Guhwe tomography brain scan is not useful in stable patients post intravenous tissue plasmino­gen activator. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(3):540–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.11.006.
Tanswell P, Seifried E, Su PCAF, Feuerer W, Rijken DC. Pharmacokinetics and systemic
94. effects of tissue-type plasminogen activator in normal subjects. Clin Pharmacol Therap. 1989;46(2):155–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1989.120.
95.
Cannon CP with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;98(25):2805–14.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.98.25.2805.
aghi S, Boehme AK, Dibu J, etal. Treatment and outcome of thrombolysis-related hem-
96.
Y orrhage: a multicenter retrospective study. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(12):1451–7. https://doi.
org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2371.
erkerk BS, Lesch C, Cham S, Berger K. Cryoprecipitate for alteplase-related hemor-
97.
V rhagic conversion of acute ischemic stroke. J Pharm Pract. 2023;36(5):1253–9. https://doi.
org/10.1177/08971900221102116.
98.
Barra ME, Feske SK, Sylvester KW, et al. Fibrinogen concentrate for the treatment of
thrombolysis­Hemost. 2020;26:1076029620951867. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029620951867.
99.
French KF after thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17(1):107–11.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-
100.
Rosao F, Vandelli L, Bigliardi G, et al. Usefulness of thromboelastography in the
detection and management of tissue plasminogen activator-associated hyperbri­nolysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(2):e29–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.10.039.
101.
Hailu K, Ragoonanan D, Da rhagic conversion following administration of tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;59:216.e1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.022.
Y, Zhou ZH, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy vs alteplase for patients with
V, von Kummer R, del Zoppo G, Bluhmki E.Hemorrhagic transformation in acute
CA, Alvarez-Sabín J, Montaner J, etal. Thrombolysis-related hemorrhagic infarc-
M, Utley-Smith Q, Blessing R, Goldstein LB. Routine 24-hour computed
, Gibson CM, McCabe CH, etal. TNK–tissue plasminogen activator compared
associated hemorrhage in adult ischemic strok
, White J, Hoesch RE.Treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage with tranexamic acid
, Ornello R, etal. Divergence between clinical trial evidence and
ational study. Lancet. 2007;369(9558):275–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/
e patients. Clin Appl Thromb
012- 9681- 5.
vis H.Tranexamic acid for treatment of symptomatic hemor-
B. Barlow et al.
cute Ischemic Stroke
17
A
102. Verkerk BS, Berger K, Lesch CA.Aminocaproic acid for the reversal of alteplase: a case series. J Pharm Pract. 2020;33(6):919–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190019840095.
103. Ma L, Hu X, Song L, etal. The third intensive care bundle with blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT3): an international, stepped wedge clus­ter randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023;402(10395):27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0140- 6736(23)00806- 1.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108. Mas-Serrano M, García-Pastor A, Iglesias-Mohedano AM, etal. Related factors with orolin-
109.
110.
Vigneron C, Lécluse A, Ronzière T, etal. Angioedema associated with thrombolysis for isch-
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
Pahs L, Droege C, Kneale H, Pancioli A. A novel approach to the treatment of orolin-
116.
117.
118.
T, Bäck O.Elevated plasmin-alpha 2-antiplasmin complex levels in hereditary angio-
Nilsson edema: evidence for the invivo efciency of the intrinsic brinolytic system. Thromb Res. 1985;40(6):817–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049- 3848(85)90318- 4. Molinaro G, Gerv binant tissue plasminogen activator treatment: an invitro experimental approach. Stroke. 2002;33(6):1712–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000017284.77838.87.
ate JE, Kalimullah EA, Wijdicks EFM.Angioedema after tPA: what neurointensivists
Fug should know. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16(3):440–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028- 012- 9678- 0.
erner R, Keller M, Woehrle JC. Facial angioedema and stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis.
W 2014;38(2):101–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365205.
gual angioedema after intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: results from a single­center cohort and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(1):441–52.
s10072- 021- 05279- y.
AC, Eaton A, Melles RB, etal. Comparative safety of tenecteplase vs alteplase for acute
Flint ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023;33(1):107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107468.
oubou A, Philippeau F, Derex L, etal. Audit report and systematic review of orolingual
Lek angioedema in post-acute stroke thrombolysis. Neurol Res. 2014;36(7):687–94. https://doi.
org/10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000302.
emic stroke: analysis of a case-control study. J Intern Med. 2019;286(6):702–10. https://doi.
org/10.1111/joim.12962.
C, Cantier M, Rodriguez-Régent C, Gout O, Obadia M.Orolingual and abdominal
Benoit angioedema post thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Neurology. 2018;90(3):140–1. https://doi.
org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004834.
wn E, Campana C, Zimmerman J, Brooks S. Icatibant for the treatment of orolingual
Bro angioedema following the administration of tissue plasminogen activator. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(6):1125.e1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.018.
E, Dodd L, Smith W, Kleinig T.Icatibant as a potential treatment of life-threatening
Cheong alteplase-induced angioedema. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(2):e36–7. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.039.
ollmach AD, Zehnder D, Schwendinger M, Tarnutzer AA. Unilateral orolingual angio-
W edema in a patient with sarcoidosis after intravenous thrombolysis due to acute stroke without improvement after treatment with icatibant. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13(12):e236643. https://
doi.org/10.1136/bcr-
gual angioedema after tissue plasminogen activator administration. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;68(3):345–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.02.019. Martinez Manzano JM, Lo KB, P venous tranexamic acid for patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor–induced angioedema: a case series. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021;126(6):725–6. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.anai.2021.02.011.
Hasara S, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema. Cureus. 2021;13(9):e18116.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18116.
ais N, Adam A.Biochemical basis of angioedema associated with recom-
https://doi.org/10.1007/
2020- 236643.
atarroyo-Aponte G, Azmaiparashvili Z.The use of intra-
Wilson K, Amatea J, Anderson J.Tranexamic acid for the emergency treatment of
469
470
119. Thorén M, Azevedo E, Dawson J, etal. Predictors for cerebral edema in acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke. 2017;48(9):2464–71. https://doi.org/10.1161/
STROKEAHA.117.018223.
120.
121. Wijdicks EFM, Sheth KN, Carter BS, et al. Recommendations for the management of
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
129.
130.
131.
132.
133.
e W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R. “Malignant”
Hack middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol. 1996;53(4):309–15. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1996.00550040037012.
cerebral and cerebellar infarction with swelling. Stroke. 2014;45(4):1222–38. https://doi.
org/10.1161/01.str.0000441965.15164.d6.
AM, Morgan Jones G, Hawryluk GWJ, etal. Guidelines for the acute treatment of
Cook cerebral edema in neurocritical care patients. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32(3):647–66. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s12028- 020- 00959- 7.
oenig MA, Bryan M, Lewin JL, Mirski MA, Geocadin RG, Stevens RD.Reversal of trans-
K tentorial herniation with hypertonic saline. Neurology. 2008;70(13):1023–9. https://doi.
org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000304042.05557.60.
ideen TO, Zazulia AR, Manno EM, et al. Mannitol bolus preferentially shrinks non-
V infarcted brain in patients with ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2001;57(11):2120–2. https://doi.
org/10.1212/WNL.57.11.2120.
Reinink H, Jüttler E, Hack infarction: a systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(2):208–16. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3745.
wer A, Mulcahy M, Maharaj M, et al. Surgical decompression for malignant cere-
Do bral oedema after ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;11 https://doi.
org/10.1002/14651858.CD014989.pub2.
Brondani R, Garcia de epilepsy after decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2017;7(1):51–61. https://doi.org/10.1159/000458730.
Yeap MC, Chen CC, Liu ZH, etal. Postcranioplasty seizures following decompressive crani-
ectomy and seizure prophylaxis: a retrospective analysis at a single institution. J Neurosurg. 2018;131(3):936–40. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.4.JNS172519.
Franco AC, Fernandes T, Peralta AR, etal. Frequency of epileptic seizures in patients under-
going decompressive craniectomy after ischemic stroke. Seizure. 2022;101:60–6. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.seizure.2022.07.011.
ey GJ. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for stroke prevention. Stroke.
Hank 2003;34(2):354–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000054261.97525.4B. Chen J, Li S, Zheng K, et Assoc. 2019;8(8):e011696. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.011696.
Parikh NS, Omran SS, Kamel H, Elkind MSV, Willey J.Smoking-cessation pharmacotherapy
for patients with stroke and TIA: systematic review. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;78:236–41. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.04.026.
in Y, Zhang L, Marshall I, Wolfe C, Wang Y.Statin therapy for preventing recurrent stroke
Y in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies. Neuroepidemiology. 2022;56(4):240–9.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000525672.
e W, etal. Surgical decompression for space-occupying hemispheric
Almeida A, Abrahim Cherubini P, etal. High risk of seizures and
al. Impact of smoking status on stroke recurrence. J Am Heart
B. Barlow et al.
Chapter 18
Status Epilepticus andRefractory Status Epilepticus
MorganTrammel, CinaSasannejad, BeverlyTomita, andCheryleeW.J.Chang

18.1 Introduction

In neurocritical care, a critical care pharmacist brings added expertise when well versed in cerebral pathophysiology, nuances of neuropathology, updated or newly established guidelines, and emerging neuro-pharmacotherapeutics [1, 2]. This specialty- specic knowledge includes strategies for prophylaxis or management of seizures or status epilepticus (SE). SE was redened by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) in 2015 as “a condition resulting either from the failure of the mechanisms responsible for seizure termination or from the initiation of mechanisms which lead to abnormally prolonged seizures (after time point t1).” It is a condition that can have long-term consequences (after time point t2), including neuronal death, neu­ronal injury, and alteration of neuronal networks, depending on the type and duration of seizures [3]. The intent is to utilize the operational time points to determine when treatment should be considered or started (time point t1, which the ILAE dened as 5min) and to utilize time point t2 (dened as 30min) to determine the aggressiveness
M. Trammel Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Hospital, Durham, USA
C. Sasannejad Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
B. Tomita Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
C. W. J. Chang ( Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
Department of Medicine Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA e-mail: Cherylee.Chang@duke.edu
Switzerland AG 2025 Y. Alzaidi, M. A. Gebily (eds.), The Pharmacist’s Expanded Role in Critical Care Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77335-8_18
*)
471© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
472
M. Trammel et al.
of treatment to prevent long-term consequences, e.g., neuronal injury or death. Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is dened as intractable seizures unresponsive to a rst-line anti-seizure medication (ASM), i.e., initial benzodiazepine (BZP), and an adequate second-line ASM, e.g., a full loading dose of an intravenous (IV) ASM.Super­refractory SE (SRSE) is dened as RSE that continues or recurs 24h or longer despite the initiation of IV anesthetic agents [4, 5]. Even more recently, consensus denitions to standardize terminology to facilitate communication for clinical care and research include (1) new-onset RSE (NORSE), which is a clinical presentation in a patient without known epilepsy or preexisting relevant neurological disorder or clear struc­tural, toxic, or metabolic etiology; (2) febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) as a subcategory of NORSE that requires a prior febrile infection between 24h and 2weeks prior to the onset of RSE; (3) prolonged RSE (PRSE), which is RSE that lasts for at least 7days despite appropriate management, but without the use of anesthetics; and (4) prolonged SRSE (PSRSE), which is SRSE that persists for at least 7days including the ongoing need for anesthetics [6] (Table18.1).
Table 18.1 Nomenclature and denitions of status epilepticus [3, 4, 6]
Potential for secondary injury
Variable
Variable
Moderate
High
High
Denition Time course
Status epilepticus (SE)
Nonconvulsive SE (NCSE)
Refractory SE (RSE)
Prolonged RSE (PRSE)
Super refractory SE (SRSE)
Prolonged SRSE (PSRSE)
NORSE New-onset RSE in a patient
FIRES NORSE with febrile infection
Abnormally prolonged seizures that can have long-term consequences if not treated depending on seizure type and duration
Electrographic seizures without overt symptomatology other than decreased LOC
Intractable seizures unresponsive to a rst-line ASM
RSE lasting 7+ days despite appropriate management without the use of anesthetics
RSE continuing or recurring 24h+ despite the initiation of IV anesthetic agents
SRSE persisting 7+ days including ongoing need for IV anesthetic agents
without known epilepsy or preexisting relevant neurological disorder or clear structural, toxic, or metabolic etiology
24h to 2weeks prior to onset of RSE
IV anesthetic use
5–30+min May be
5–30+min May be
30min–24h with anesthetics; 30min–7days without anesthetics
7+ days No High
24+h Yes High
7+ days Ye s High
Variable May be
Variable May be
required
required
May be required
required
required
18 Status Epilepticus andRefractory Status Epilepticus
473
In a patient, the clinical signs and symptoms or semiology of the seizures may change over time in SE; however, it has been established that nonconvulsive sei­zures (NCSz) and NCSE, i.e., electrographic ictal activity without overt motor symptomatology except a decreased level of consciousness (LOC), can cause sec­ondary neuronal injury [7]. Electroencephalography (EEG) is an important tool to detect occult NCSz and NCSE in the ICU since patients are frequently mechani­cally ventilated and sedated without obvious convulsive activity [8].
Depending on the cohort, SE has been associated with 30-day mortality varying between 8.5% and 31% [9, 10]. In the United States, a nationwide cohort of 33,814 patients showed a higher 30-day mortality in adults (10.2%) than in children (1.8%). The combined 1-year mortality was 25.1% (30.3% in adults and 4.6% in children); however, neurologic disability was highest in children aged 5–9years (21.3%) [9]. In this cohort, prognostic factors for both 30-day and 1-year mortality included older age, no active (recent) history of epilepsy, presence of an acute etiology, and refractoriness of SE.Other studies also found that older age, duration, and NCSE were associated with new neurological decits, which predicted worse 2-year survival [11]. In one German cohort of 2585 patients with SE, discharge mortality increased from 9.6% in non-refractory SE to 15.0% (p<0.001) in RSE and 39.9% (p<0.001) in SRSE [12]. These factors highlight the importance of terminating SE as quickly as possible.
After reviewing the cellular pathophysiology of SE, which informs the basis for pharmacotherapeutic modalities, this chapter provides a compendium of the most recent and commonly utilized ASM in SE and caveats and indications of use and explores novel methods for treatment.
18.2 Cellular Pathophysiology ofStatus Epilepticus
Typically fueled by an underlying etiology, when seizures persist, N-methyl-D­aspartate (NMD glutaminergic excitotoxicity coincides with the internalization of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) GABAergic activity. The loss of inhibition, coupled with synaptic excitation, decreases not only the likelihood of spontaneous termination but also the likelihood that GABAergic medications such as BZPs and barbiturates will be effective to terminate seizures in SE and may explain the therapeutic efcacy of NMDA antagonists in SE [14, 15]. Increased NMDA receptor activity results in excessive intraneuronal calcium entry with activation of nitric oxide synthase, calpains, and NADPH oxidase with reac­tive oxygen species causing oxidative stress. This results in widespread damage to DNA, proteins, and lipids followed by neuroinammation and neuronal death. Increased calcium accumulation results in mitochondrial failure due to changes in the membrane potential with opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, followed by decrease in ATP production, mitochondrial swelling, and apoptosis [5, 16].
Understanding the mechanistic changes to receptors, the effect on neurotrans­mitters, and the cascade of injury may help tailor appropriate and timely therapy to prevent neuronal injury, death, and cognitive decline after SE (Figs. 18.1 and 18.2).
A) receptors accumulate in the synapse [13]. Subsequent enhanced
receptors, producing a functional decrease in the synaptic inhibitory
A
474
M. Trammel et al.
Fig. 18.1 Location of the mechanism of action of anti-seizure medications (Reproduced with permission from Löscher W, Klein P.The Pharmacology and Clinical Efcacy of Anti-seizure Medications: From Bromide Salts to Cenobamate and Beyond. CNS Drugs 2021;35:935–63 [17]). Asterisks indicate multiple mechanisms of action (MOA), although only the primary MOA is shown in the gure. AMPA -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid, Ca
cium, Cl transporter 1, K
chloride, GABA γ-aminobutyric acid, GABA-T GABA aminotransferase, GAT-1 GABA
+
potassium, KCNQ Kv7 potassium channel family, Na+ sodium, NMDA N-methyl-
2+
cal-
-aspartate, SV2A synaptic vesicle protein 2A
S
18
tatus Epilepticus andRefractory Status Epilepticus
475
Fig. 18.2 The timeline of available anti-seizure medications (Reproduced with permission from Löscher W, Klein P.The Pharmacology and Clinical Efcacy of Anti-seizure Medications: From Bromide Salts to Cenobamate and Beyond. CNS Drugs 2021;35:935–63 [17])
18.3 Pharmacokinetics andDrug-Drug Interactions
A distinctive role for the pharmacist in the management of patients with SE involves understanding key principles of absorption and lipo- or hydrophilicity, which affect the volume of distribution (Vd), central nervous system (CNS) penetration, metabo­lism, and elimination of each ASM.Especially salient are (1) protein-binding prop­erties that result in competition for binding sites on albumin and (2) induction or inhibition of hepatic enzymes. These properties can result in signicant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) [18]. Careful consideration should also be given when contem­plating initiation, increase, decrease, or discontinuation of a medication that is a known inducer or inhibitor of enzymes. Similarly, adding a medication to known inducers or inhibitors should be carefully evaluated. It is beyond the scope of this chapter to review all DDIs; however, there are many electronic databases and online applications that are readily available to assess these interactions.
Most ASMs are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 system in the liver by
Cytochrome P450 enzymes have broad substrate specicity; therefore, a single drug may be a substrate for multiple enzymes, such as CYP3A4, 2CP9, and 2C19.