Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5573_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Foreword
- •Foreword
- •Contents of Volume I
- •Contents of Volume II
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.4.3 Acute Stroke
- •1.4.4 CNS Infection
- •1.4.1 Sepsis
- •1.4.2 Acute Encephalopathy
- •1.4.5 Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia
- •1.4.6 Nosocomial Pneumonia
- •1.4.7 Pulmonary Edema
- •1.4.8 Fever
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.4 ECG Nomenclature
- •2.4.1 P Wave
- •2.4.2 PR Interval
- •2.4.3 QRS Complex
- •2.4.4 J Point
- •2.4.5 ST Segment
- •2.4.6 T Wave
- •2.4.7 QT Interval
- •2.4.8 U Wave
- •2.4.9 RR Interval
- •2.5.1 P Wave
- •2.5.1.1 Atrial Arrhythmias
- •Atrial Fibrillation
- •Atrial Flutter
- •Atrial Tachycardia
- •Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia
- •2.5.1.2 Interatrial Blocks
- •Intermittent Interatrial Block (I-IAB)
- •Advanced Interatrial Block (A-IAB)
- •2.5.2 P-QRS Ratio
- •2.5.2.1 Shortened P-QRS Ratio
- •Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome (WPW)
- •Junctional Rhythm
- •Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia (AVNRT)
- •2.5.2.3 Prolonged P-QRS Ratio
- •2.5.3 PR Interval
- •2.5.3.1 Shortened PR Interval
- •2.5.3.2 Prolonged PR Interval
- •2.5.3.3 Second-Degree AV Block
- •Advanced AV Block
- •Third-Degree AV Block (Complete Heart Block)
- •2.5.4 PR Segment
- •2.5.4.1 PR-Segment Elevation
- •2.5.4.2 PR-Segment Depression
- •Acute Pericarditis
- •Acute Myocardial Ischemia
- •2.5.5 Q Waves
- •2.5.6 QRS Complex
- •2.5.6.1 Heart Rate
- •2.5.7 QT Interval
- •2.5.8 ST Segment
- •2.5.8.1 ST-Segment Depression
- •2.5.8.2 ST-Segment Elevation
- •2.5.9 T Waves
- •2.5.9.1 Inverted T Wave
- •2.5.9.2 Flattened T Wave
- •2.5.9.3 Peaked T Wave
- •References
- •Further Reading
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2.2 Nasogastric Tube
- •3.2.3 Central Venous Catheters
- •3.2.4 Cardiac Devices
- •3.2.5 Arterial Catheters
- •3.3 Cardiopulmonary Abnormalities
- •3.3.1 Pulmonary Edema
- •3.3.2 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- •3.3.3 Atelectasis
- •3.3.4 Aspiration
- •3.3.5 Pneumonia
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.5 Modes of Mechanical Ventilation
- •4.5.1 Volume Control Ventilation
- •4.5.2 Pressure Control Ventilation
- •4.5.3 Pressure Support Ventilation
- •4.6 Patient-Ventilator Interactions
- •4.6.1 Trigger Dyssynchrony
- •4.6.2 Flow Dyssynchrony
- •4.6.3 Cycle Dyssynchrony
- •4.9.1 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- •4.9.2 Severe Asthma Exacerbation
- •4.11 Summary
- •5.10 Neuromuscular Blockade
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.3 Pathobiology
- •5.4 ARDS Phenotypes
- •5.5 Lung-Protective Ventilation
- •5.6 Positive End-Expiratory Pressure
- •5.7 Conservative Fluid Management
- •5.8 Moderate-to-Severe ARDS
- •5.9 Prone Positioning
- •5.11 Corticosteroids
- •5.12 Inhaled Pulmonary Vasodilators
- •5.13 Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
- •5.14 Survivorship
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction/Epidemiology
- •6.2 Physiology
- •6.2.2 Physiology During COPD Exacerbation
- •6.4 Pharmacologic Treatment
- •6.4.1 Bronchodilators
- •6.4.1.1 Mechanism
- •6.4.2 Glucocorticoid Therapy
- •6.4.2.1 Mechanism
- •6.4.2.4 Duration
- •6.4.3 Antimicrobials
- •6.4.3.1 Antibiotic Patient Selection
- •6.4.4.1 Nonpharmacologic Interventions
- •6.4.4.2 Opioids
- •6.4.4.3 Benzodiazepines
- •6.4.4.4 Dexmedetomidine
- •6.4.4.5 Ketamine
- •6.4.5 Adjunctive Therapies
- •6.4.5.1 Magnesium
- •6.4.5.3 Vitamin D
- •6.4.5.4 Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
- •6.4.5.5 Smoking Cessation
- •6.4.5.6 Bowel Regimen
- •6.4.5.7 Mucolytics
- •6.4.5.8 Nutrition
- •6.4.5.9 Post-Discharge Adjuncts
- •6.5 ICU-Level Interventions
- •6.5.1 Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation
- •6.5.2 High-Flow Nasal Canula
- •6.5.3 Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
- •6.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 What Is Asthma?
- •7.2 Diagnosis
- •7.2.1 Physical Examination
- •7.2.2 Laboratory Data
- •7.2.3 Radiographic Findings
- •7.3.1 Standard-of-Care Therapy
- •7.3.3 Potential Adjunctive Therapies
- •7.3.3.1 Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICSs)
- •7.3.3.4 Intravenous (IV) Aminophylline
- •7.3.3.5 Intravenous (IV) Beta2-Agonists
- •7.3.3.6 Leukotriene Antagonists (LTRAs)
- •7.3.3.7 Intramuscular (IM) or IV Epinephrine
- •7.3.3.8 Inhaled Anesthetics
- •7.3.3.9 Inhaled Helium-Oxygen (Heliox)
- •7.3.3.10 Intravenous Ketamine
- •7.3.4.1 Subcutaneous (SC) Biologics
- •7.4.1 Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV)
- •7.4.2 Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV)
- •7.6.1 Outpatient Follow-Up
- •7.7 Summary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.1.3.2 Anatomic Location
- •8.1.3.3 Chronicity
- •8.1.4 Clinical Presentation
- •8.1.4.1 Symptoms
- •8.1.4.2 Physician Examination
- •8.1.4.3 Cardiopulmonary Compromise
- •8.2.1.1 Clinical Pretest/Scores
- •8.2.1.2 D-Dimer-Level Interpretations
- •8.2.2 Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA)
- •8.2.3 Mortality Risk Assessment
- •8.2.3.1 PE Severity Index Score
- •8.2.3.2 Prognostic Indicators
- •8.3.2 High-Risk PE
- •8.4 Systemic Thrombolytic Therapy
- •8.4.1.1 High-Risk PE
- •8.4.1.2 Intermediate-Risk PE
- •8.4.1.3 Cardiac Arrest
- •8.5.2 Percutaneous Mechanical Interventions
- •8.5.2.2 Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis
- •8.5.3 Surgical Embolectomy
- •8.5.4 Mechanical Circulatory Support
- •8.6.1 PE Response Team (PERT)
- •8.6.3.1 Renal Dysfunction
- •8.6.3.4 Cancer
- •8.6.3.5 Treatment Failure
- •8.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1.2 ECMO Outcomes
- •9.2 ECMO During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (eCPR)
- •9.2.1 Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal
- •9.3 ECMO Management
- •9.3.3 Fluid Management
- •9.4.1 Coagulation Changes
- •9.4.2 Transfusion Thresholds
- •9.4.3.1 Heparin
- •9.4.3.2 Direct Thrombin Inhibitors
- •9.4.4 Monitoring Anticoagulation
- •9.6.2.1 Opioids
- •9.6.2.2 Ketamine
- •9.6.2.3 Propofol
- •9.6.2.4 Benzodiazepines
- •9.6.2.5 Dexmedetomidine
- •9.7.1 Aminoglycosides
- •9.7.2 Beta-Lactams
- •9.7.4 Antifungals
- •9.9 Other Complications
- •9.9.1 Bleeding
- •9.9.2 Thrombosis
- •9.9.3 Neurologic
- •9.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Type 1–5 Myocardial Infarctions
- •10.2 Acute Coronary Syndrome (Type 1 MI)
- •10.3 Clinical Presentation/Evaluation
- •10.4 Non-pharmacologic Therapy
- •10.5 Pharmacologic Therapy
- •10.5.1 Fibrinolytics
- •10.5.2 Anticoagulants
- •10.5.2.1 Heparins
- •10.5.2.2 Direct Thrombin Inhibitors
- •10.5.3 Antiplatelets
- •10.5.3.1 Aspirin
- •10.5.3.2 P2Y12 Inhibitors
- •Clopidogrel
- •Prasugrel
- •Ticagrelor
- •10.5.3.3 Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors
- •10.5.3.4 Cangrelor
- •10.7 Long-Term Management
- •10.7.1 High Bleed Risk (HBR)
- •10.7.2 Statins
- •10.7.3 Beta-Blockers
- •10.7.5 Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.2 What is Ejection Fraction?
- •11.4 Understanding Blood Pressure
- •11.5 Preload vs. Afterload
- •11.6 Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
- •11.6.2 Etiology
- •11.8 Treating Volume Overload
- •11.8.1 Loop Diuretics
- •11.9 Intravenous Vasodilators
- •11.10 Cardiogenic Shock
- •11.10.1 Inotrope Clinical Pearl
- •11.12 Digoxin
- •11.12.3 Loading Dose
- •11.12.4 Maintenance Dosing
- •11.12.5 Monitoring
- •11.12.7 Distribution
- •11.12.8 Drug-Drug Interactions
- •11.12.9 Digoxin Toxicity
- •11.13 ADHF Clinical Pearls
- •11.13.3 Avoid Phenylephrine
- •11.13.4 Use Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
- •11.14 Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy
- •11.15 Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis
- •11.16 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.3 Diagnostic Findings
- •12.4.1 Oxygen Therapy
- •12.4.2 Pharmacological Management
- •12.4.3 Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS)
- •12.5 Pulmonary Hypertension
- •12.6 The Pharmacist’s Role
- •12.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Atrial Arrhythmias
- •13.2.2 Atrioventricular Blocks
- •13.2.3 Atrial Fibrillation
- •13.2.3.2 Anticoagulation
- •13.2.3.3 Rate vs. Rhythm Control
- •13.2.4 Atrial Flutter
- •13.2.5 Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)
- •13.3 Ventricular Arrhythmias
- •13.3.1 Premature Ventricular Complexes
- •13.3.2 Ventricular Tachycardia
- •13.3.2.1 Torsades de Pointes
- •13.3.3 Ventricular Fibrillation
- •13.3.4 Ventricular Arrhythmia Treatment Strategies
- •13.3.4.1 ICD Implantation
- •13.3.4.2 Pharmacologic Treatments
- •13.3.4.3 Catheter Ablation
- •13.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.3.2 Laboratory Assessment
- •14.3.3 Imaging
- •14.3.4 Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring
- •14.4.1 Distributive
- •14.4.2 Cardiogenic
- •14.4.3 Hypovolemic
- •14.4.4 Obstructive
- •14.5 Management
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Background
- •15.2 Diagnosis
- •15.3 Management
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3 Hemodynamics
- •16.5 Pharmacological Management
- •16.5.1 Hyperosmolar Therapy
- •16.5.3 Barbiturate Coma
- •16.6 Nonpharmacological Treatments
- •16.6.2 Temperature Management
- •16.6.3 Prophylactic Hypothermia
- •16.7 Adjunct Therapies
- •16.7.2 Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis
- •16.7.3 Antibiotic Prophylaxis
- •16.7.4 Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis (SUP)
- •16.7.5 Tranexamic Acid
- •16.7.6 Glucose Targets
- •16.7.7 Steroids
- •16.8 Complications
- •16.8.1 Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity
- •16.8.3 Central Fever
- •16.8.4.1 Diabetes Insipidus
- •16.8.4.3 Cerebral Salt Wasting Syndrome
- •16.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introductory Case
- •17.2 Introduction
- •17.4 Pathophysiology
- •17.5 Acute Therapies
- •17.5.1 Thrombolytic Therapy
- •17.5.2 Thrombectomy
- •17.5.3 Blood Pressure Management
- •17.5.4 Acute Anticoagulation
- •17.5.5 Antiplatelet Therapy
- •17.6 Early Complications
- •17.6.1 Hemorrhagic Conversion
- •17.6.2 Angioedema
- •17.6.3 Malignant Cerebral Edema
- •17.7 Secondary Prevention
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.4 Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
- •18.5 Adverse Drug Effects
- •18.7 Anti-seizure Medications
- •18.7.1 Available Parenteral Preparations
- •18.7.1.1 Benzodiazepines: GABAA Receptor Activation
- •18.7.1.2 Other GABAergic Therapies
- •Barbiturates: GABAergic
- •Phenobarbital
- •Pentobarbital Infusion
- •Propofol Infusion: GABAergic
- •18.7.1.3 Second-Line Non-anesthetic ASMs
- •Levetiracetam: Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2A Binding

436
211. Harrois A, Anstey JR.Diabetes insipidus and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone in critically ill patients. Crit Care Clin. 2019;35(2):187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ccc.2018.11.001.
212.
213.
214.
215.
216.
ardt J, Winzeler B, Christ-Crain M.Diabetes insipidus: an update. Endocrinol Metab
Ref
Clin. 2020;49(3):517–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2020.05.012.
Bendz H,
ment. Drug Saf. 1999;21(6):449–56. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018- 199921060- 00002.
Gross P
https://doi.org/10.1177/2042018812437561.
erbalis JG, Goldsmith SR, Greenberg A, etal. Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hypo-
V
natremia: expert panel recommendations. Am J Med. 2013;126(10 Suppl 1):S1–42. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.07.006.
Sterns RH, Rondon-Berrios H,
mia: stay the course. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023;19(1):129–35. https://doi.org/10.2215/
CJN.0000000000000244.
Aurell M. Drug-induced diabetes insipidus: incidence, prevention and manage-
. Clinical management of SIADH. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2012;3(2):61–73.
Adrogué HJ, et al. Treatment guidelines for hyponatre-
L. V. JuradoHernández and T. A. Allison

Chapter 17
Acute Ischemic Stroke
BrookeBarlow, AndrewJ.Webb, andKarenBerger
17.1 Introductory Case
A 76-year-old man with a past medical history of hypertension, pancreatitis, and
hyperlipidemia presents to the emergency department (ED) at 10:16am via emergency medical service (EMS) with acute-onset right-sided hemiplegia. He was last
seen well at 9:30am that morning by his son, who was traveling with him to a family party. When the patient attempted to get out of the car, he was unable to stand
and the son noted that he had a new right-sided facial droop and slurred speech.
Concerned for the signs of a stroke, the son called 911.
In the ED, his initial blood pressure was 170/59mm Hg, his heart rate was 85
beats per minute in normal sinus rhythm, and he had a respiratory rate of 18 with an
SpO2 of 100%. On initial exam, he was alert and oriented, followed commands, and
had normal horizontal extraocular movements and intact visual elds. His motor
exam was notable for mild right-sided facial droop, moderate right lower extremity
drift, and mild-to-moderate dysarthria but normal left-sided movement and no loss
of sensation, overall scoring 5 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke
Score (NIHSS). A non-contrast head computed tomography (CT) showed agerelated parenchymal loss but no intracranial hemorrhage. The patient was diagnosed
B. Barlow
Memorial Hermann-The Woodlands Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
A. J. Webb (
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
e-mail: ajwebb@mgh.harvard.edu
K. Berger
Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Switzerland AG 2025
Y. Alzaidi, M. A. Gebily (eds.), The Pharmacist’s Expanded Role in Critical
Care Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77335-8_17
*)
437© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature

438
B. Barlow et al.
with an acute ischemic stroke and, after conrmation of eligibility and assent,
received IV tenecteplase at 10:49am.
In this chapter, we will review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of
acute ischemic stroke. Both acute and key secondary prevention therapies will be
discussed, including potential complications and monitoring parameters key to the
safe implementation of these therapies. A summary of the acute management of
ischemic stroke is depicted in Fig.17.1.

Acute Ischemic Stroke
17
439
Fig. 17.1 Acute ischemic stroke treatment algorithm. Acute ischemic stroke must be managed
rapidly and efciently for optimal outcomes. Patients presenting with signs and symptoms of acute
ischemic stroke should be rapidly assessed and triaged, and treatment should be initiated as soon
as possible. Patients with non-disabling symptoms (generally dened as an NIHSS of 3 or less) can
receive less emergent treatment but should still be closely monitored for neurologic worsening in
which case they may become eligible for advanced therapies. Eligibility for thrombolysis and
thrombectomy is discussed extensively throughout the chapter

440
B. Barlow et al.
17.2 Introduction
Stroke remains a global health burden and is a leading cause of death and disability
worldwide. Approximately 795,000 people suffer from a stroke event annually, of
which 75% account for rst-time events, with the remaining experiencing a recurrent attack [1]. According to the American Heart Association’s (AHA) Heart Disease
and Stroke Statistics update, stroke accounts for 1 of every 21 deaths in the United
States, with one stroke-related death occurring every 3min and 17 s [1]. Of all
strokes, acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the most common, accounting for 87% of
events, followed by intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) at 10% and subarachnoid hemorrhage at 3% [1]. Despite the marked advances in AIS management over the past
decade, the prevalence of stroke is projected to increase by 20.5% in 2030 compared
to 2012 [1]. This increase is proposed to be due to a near doubling in the rates of
hypertension and diabetes, highlighting the importance of controlling modiable
risk factors for stroke prevention [2].
17.3 Symptoms andPresentation
Early, prompt recognition of stroke symptoms is of utmost importance in AIS to
minimize the risk of potentially permanent, disabling long-term sequelae. Several
screening tools have been developed to improve the general public’s recognition of
stroke symptoms and promote timely triage. Historically, FAST (face, arm, speech,
time) was the most commonly used screening tool given its simple structure, ease of
use, and high sensitivity (85%) for stroke detection [3]. However, in clinical trials,
FAST failed to detect up to 40% of posterior circulation strokes, most notably due
to the insensitivity of FAST to visual and gate disturbances [4]. In recognition of
these shortcomings, the acronym was expanded to BEFAST (balance, eyes, face,
arm, speech, time) to include the visual symptoms and limb ataxia experienced in
posterior events to improve symptom recognition. This expansion was estimated to
reduce the proportion of missed AIS events from 14% to 4.4% [5].
While these screening tools capture most stroke warning signs, symptomatology is highly dependent on the effected intracranial vascular territory. For
example, an infarct in the left middle cerebral artery would manifest as contralateral hemiplegia, hemisensory loss, and expressive aphasia. In contrast, a
patient with a basilar artery occlusion could present with depressed consciousness, hemi- or quadriparesis, and speech abnormalities accompanied by prodromal symptoms of nausea, vertigo, neck stiffness, and headache [6]. Attention
should also be drawn to populations likely to present with atypical stroke symptoms, most notably amongst women and extremes of age [7, 8]. Women are two
times more likely to present with atypical stroke symptoms, including loss of
consciousness and nausea/vomiting, and have a lower likelihood of presenting
with lower extremity paresis [8].

A
cute Ischemic Stroke
17
441
Table 17.1 National
Institutes of Health Stroke
Scale (NIHSS)
interpretation [7]
Table 17.2
0 No symptoms
1 No signicant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities despite some symptoms
2 Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance but unable to carry out all
3 Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted
4 Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, or
5 Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent
6 Dead
Modied Rankin scale (mRS)
previous activities
unable to walk unassisted
0 No stroke symptoms
1–4 Minor stroke symptoms
5–15 Moderate stroke symptoms
16–20 Moderate–severe stroke symptoms
21–42 Severe stroke symptoms
Determining stroke severity is important in the initial AIS assessment as it can
aid in evaluating a patient’s candidacy for certain treatment options and may predict
the likelihood of an underlying large-vessel occlusion [9]. The National Institutes of
Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item neurologic examination scale used as a
quantitative assessment tool to measure the degree of stroke-related neurologic decits. The score ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating a higher stroke
severity (Table17.1) [7]. NIHSS is also used to follow changes in neurologic examination after treatment interventions such as thrombectomy or thrombolysis [7].
Higher scores on the NIHSS correlate with increasing severity of stroke, but it is
important to note that the score may underestimate the severity of strokes occurring
in the nondominant hemisphere or in the posterior circulation. The mRS is a 7-step
ordinal scale which measures the degree of functional disability or dependence in
those who experience a stroke (Table17.2). Achieving an mRS of 0–1 at 90days is
traditionally considered to be an excellent outcome.
17.4 Pathophysiology
AIS is characterized by a mismatch of oxygen supply and demand in cortical tissue,
leading to focal neurologic decits. Insufcient arterial cerebral blood ow (CBF)
to brain tissue leads to local ischemia as neurons receive insufcient oxygen to carry
out normal cellular respiration, which inevitably leads to cell death if CBF cannot
be restored [10]. While stroke was historically a purely clinical diagnosis, advances
in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have allowed for identication of the hyperacute changes secondary to ischemia within minutes of CBF falling below the ischemic threshold of 10–20 mL/100 g/min [11]. Early hyperacute changes seen on

442
MRI are referred to as an ischemic core, and the vascular territory surrounding the
core that is receiving suboptimal CBF and is at risk of ischemia is referred to as the
penumbra. Core tissue is considered unsalvageable unless reperfusion occurs immediately, while penumbral tissue can be salvaged with acute therapies. Ischemic
lesions tend to follow the vascular territory of the artery involved in the occlusion,
apart from hypoperfusion strokes (also known as “watershed” strokes), which tend
to cause damage at the border zones between vascular territories.
The cellular mechanisms underpinning cerebral ischemia have been the target of
extensive research, both to understand the underlying pathways involved in neuronal
cell death and to identify potential therapeutic targets to limit primary and secondary
injury after AIS.Insufcient oxygen delivery to neurons leads to an incapacity to transport calcium across the cell membrane. Intracellular calcium accumulation paired with
an inability to regulate extracellular glutamate concentrations leads to further alterations
in cellular ion gradients, intracellular edema, and activation of apoptosis pathways. The
accumulation of intracellular ions and excess water and the resulting production of reactive oxygen species lead to acidosis, DNA damage, and ultimately programmed cell
death [10]. Pharmacotherapeutic agents targeting these pathways have been introduced
in clinical trials but have yet to be demonstrated to be benecial in humans.
The etiology of AIS can be broadly categorized into thromboembolic and hemodynamic categories. Thromboembolic strokes occur due to an abrupt cessation of
CBF caused by either an embolus (such as a cardioembolism caused by atrial brillation) or a thrombosis (such as via stenosis caused by atherosclerosis).
Hemodynamic strokes are less common and occur when blood supply to the brain
is insufcient to meet cerebral demands. This can occur during prolonged hypotension because of increased cerebral metabolic demand or a mismatch in arterial
blood ow between ischemic and nonischemic brain regions (“reversed Robin Hood
syndrome”). Stroke etiologies are often further subdivided into the TOAST (Trial of
Org 10172in Acute Stroke Treatment Trial) criteria, categorizing strokes as caused
by either large-artery atherosclerosis, cardioembolism, small-vessel disease, other
determined etiology, or undetermined etiology (also referred to as cryptogenic or
stroke of unknown source) [12]. While the acute management of AIS is largely
similar across etiologies, determination of the cause of a stroke is critical to the
selection of appropriate secondary stroke prevention therapy and is a core objective
of index admission after AIS [13].
B. Barlow et al.
17.5 Acute Therapies
17.5.1 Thrombolytic Therapy
Intravenous thrombolysis is the cornerstone of acute therapy for patients with
AIS.Thrombolytics catalyze the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, a proteolytic enzyme responsible for breaking the cross-links between brin and destabilizing clot integrity. Dissolution of the brin-rich thrombus with thrombolytics restores

17 Acute Ischemic Stroke
443
blood ow and perfusion to ischemic areas and, if administered within a timely
fashion, mitigates the risk of irreversible ischemic damage [14]. Alteplase (r-tPA)
was the rst FDA-approved thrombolytic for AIS based on the results of the 1995
NINDS trial, which demonstrated a 30% increased likelihood of a favorable functional outcome as measured on the modied Rankin scale (mRS) at 90days compared to placebo [15]. The NINDS trial, in combination with the ECASS-III trial
[16], established alteplase as the standard of care in eligible patients with AIS.The
benets of treatment are directly linked to the expediency of treatment initiation
after last known well (LKW) [17]. When thrombolysis is initiated within 0–3h of
LKW, the number needed to treat (NNT) is estimated to be 10 for one patient to
achieve an excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1) at 90days. The NNT increases
to 19 when treatment is initiated within 3–4.5h of LKW, emphasizing the critical
importance of timely initiation in eligible patients. Thrombolysis signicantly
increases the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) compared to placebo, but the long-term benets of thrombolysis outweigh the risks in eligible
patients.
Prolonged ischemic injury leads to capillary cell apoptosis, increased vascular
permeability, inammation, and oxidative stress, enhancing the risk of hemorrhagic
transformation [18]. Thus, treatment initiation beyond 4.5h is not recommended
given the potential for higher rates of intracranial bleeding [7, 18]. However,
advancements have been made in the subgroup of “wake-up” strokes, which were
historically considered a contraindication to thrombolytic therapy given the
unknown time of symptom onset and potential for a completed infarct. A series of
trials evaluated the use of advanced imaging techniques using diffusion-weighted
imaging MRI with uid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence or CT
perfusion to identify the presence of a salvageable penumbra amenable for intervention with thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy [7, 19, 20]. A meta-analysis of three
randomized trials evaluating the use of thrombolysis in patients with AIS presenting
within 4.5–9 h of LKW who underwent advanced imaging to identify perfusion
mismatches revealed that a higher proportion of patients achieved an excellent functional outcome with alteplase compared to placebo, demonstrating that careful
patient selection could extend the window of eligibility [20].
Patients presenting with symptoms of AIS must be rapidly assessed for eligibility and contraindications to thrombolysis. Patients presenting within 4.5h of LKW
or within 9h of LKW with perfusion mismatch on advanced imaging and who have
disabling stroke symptoms (traditionally dened as an NIHSS >5) are considered
potentially eligible for thrombolysis. The 2019 AHA/ASA Acute Stroke Guidelines
provide a Level IA recommendation for thrombolysis within 3h of LKW, Level
IB-R for thrombolysis within 4.5h of LKW, and Level IIa B-R for thrombolysis in
the extended window for eligible patients [7]. Contraindications must be carefully
evaluated prior to therapy, however, to ensure that the benets outweigh the risk of
such therapy. A full list of contraindications to thrombolytics is given in Table17.3.
While alteplase has historically been the thrombolytic of choice for AIS, its complex dosing and long administration time have prompted investigation into alternative thrombolytics. Tenecteplase is a third-generation thrombolytic genetically

444
Table 17.3 Absolute and relative contraindications to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke [7]
Absolute contraindications Relative contraindications
Presentation >4.5h after onset (without the
capability to determine extended-window
eligibility)
BP sustained >185/110mm hg despite treatment Major surgery or serious non-head trauma in
Current or history of intracranial hemorrhage or
subarachnoid hemorrhage
Intracranial or spinal surgery, serious head
trauma, or previous stroke within 3months
Active internal bleeding Acute pericarditis
Intracranial, gastric, or intra-axial intracranial
neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation
Bleeding diathesis (INR >1.7, aPTT >40s,
platelets <100,000/mm
Anticoagulation use—INR >1.7, DOAC use
within 48h, recipient of therapeutic-dose UFH or
LMWH
Conrmed/suspected endocarditis or aortic arch
dissection
Recent gastrointestinal bleed (<21days)
Table 17.4 Comparison of alteplase and tenecteplase
FDA approval AIS (0–3h), PE, acute myocardial infarction
Product
availability
Final
concentration
Fibrin specicity ++ ++++
Pharmacokinetics PAI-1 resistance: Low
Stroke dosing 0.9mg/kg (max 90mg) 0.25mg/kg (max
Administration 10% as IV bolus over 1min, remainder as
3
)
Alteplase (rt-PA) Tenecteplase (TNK)
(MI)
50mg, 100mg vial 50mg vial
1mg/mL 5mg/mL
Half-life: 5min
60-min IV infusion
Recent gastrointestinal or genitourinary
bleeding more than 21days prior to
presentation
previous 14days
Acute seizure at stroke onset
Pregnancy
Minor or rapidly improving symptoms
Recent myocardial infarction (<3months)
Arterial puncture at noncompressible site
within 7days
Initial blood glucose <50 or >400mg/dL
Acute MI (off-label for
AIS)
PAI-1 resistance: High
Half-life: 22min
25mg)
IV push over 5s
B. Barlow et al.
modied to possess a 15-fold higher brin specicity and an 80-fold increased
resistance to plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), an enzyme responsible for
the inactivation of tissue plasminogen activator [21]. The increased resistance to
PAI-1 signicantly prolongs the half-life of tenecteplase, allowing tenecteplase to
be administered as an intravenous bolus compared to a bolus plus infusion [21].
Furthermore, the enhanced brin specicity prevents systemic brin degradation
and may reduce the risk of bleeding (Table17.4). The practical advantages of the
simplied preparation and ease of administration with tenecteplase may translate to

17 Acute Ischemic Stroke
445
improved door-to-needle times and help expedite patient transfer to thrombectomycapable centers [22].
Several studies have compared the safety and efcacy of tenecteplase to alteplase
in doses ranging from 0.1 to 0.4mg/kg. Initial studies were conducted in patients
with large-vessel occlusions (LVOs) who were also eligible for mechanical thrombectomy. The EXTEND-IA TNK trial enrolled patients with LVO within a 4.5-h
time window to 0.25mg/kg of tenecteplase (maximum dose of 25mg) vs. alteplase
0.9mg/kg (maximum dose of 90 mg). The proportion of patients who achieved
>50% reperfusion in the involved ischemic region was higher in the tenecteplase
group at 22% compared to only 10% in those who received alteplase (p=0.002).
Tenecteplase also resulted in improved 90-day functional outcomes (median mRS
2 vs. 3, p=0.04) with no differences in the rates of sICH.Several large RCTs conducted outside of the LVO cohort (AcT, TRACE-2, and others), have demonstrated
non-inferiority in functional outcomes between alteplase and tenecteplase with no
notable differences in bleeding events [23]. Notably, higher tenecteplase doses
(0.4mg/kg) have been shown to increase sICH rates and lead to worse functional
outcomes [24]. Therefore, the recommended dosing for tenecteplase in AIS is
0.25mg/kg (maximum of 25mg) administered as a single intravenous bolus over
5s. The 2019 AHA/ASA guidelines suggest that tenecteplase may be reasonable as
an alternative to alteplase in those who are eligible for thrombolysis and who are
also eligible to undergo mechanical thrombectomy [7]. These guidelines were
however published before a majority of this research was conducted, and future
renditions of the guidelines are likely to incorporate recommendations for
tenecteplase that reect the latest data. The 2023 European Stroke Organization
(ESO) developed expedited expert consensus recommendations for the use of
tenecteplase in AIS and provided a strong recommendation with moderate quality
of evidence for use of tenecteplase as an alternative thrombolytic to alteplase in
AIS for those who present within the 4.5-h time window [25].
17.5.2 Thrombectomy
Where thrombolytic therapy aims to pharmacologically dissolve culprit lesions
causing ischemia, patients with visualized LVOs of the major cerebral vessels may
also be eligible for endovascular thrombectomy to mechanically achieve reperfusion. Intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT) has evolved dramatically over the last two
decades and has been established as the most effective acute therapy for AIS in eligible patients. First-generation thrombectomy devices included either direct catheter aspiration or clot retrieval and were associated with increased rates of arterial
reperfusion over intravenous thrombolytic administration alone, but the improved
functional outcomes seen with second-generation stent retriever devices solidied
IAT as the standard of care [26, 27]. Stent retrievers deploy a exible stent into the
target thrombus and expand the stent so that the thrombus becomes lodged within
the stent, and the stent is then retracted. A patient-level meta-analysis of ve
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
