Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5573_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
48 Мб
Скачать
436
211. Harrois A, Anstey JR.Diabetes insipidus and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hor­mone in critically ill patients. Crit Care Clin. 2019;35(2):187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ccc.2018.11.001.
212.
213.
214.
215.
216.
ardt J, Winzeler B, Christ-Crain M.Diabetes insipidus: an update. Endocrinol Metab
Ref Clin. 2020;49(3):517–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2020.05.012. Bendz H, ment. Drug Saf. 1999;21(6):449–56. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018- 199921060- 00002. Gross P
https://doi.org/10.1177/2042018812437561.
erbalis JG, Goldsmith SR, Greenberg A, etal. Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hypo-
V natremia: expert panel recommendations. Am J Med. 2013;126(10 Suppl 1):S1–42. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.07.006.
Sterns RH, Rondon-Berrios H, mia: stay the course. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023;19(1):129–35. https://doi.org/10.2215/
CJN.0000000000000244.
Aurell M. Drug-induced diabetes insipidus: incidence, prevention and manage-
. Clinical management of SIADH. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2012;3(2):61–73.
Adrogué HJ, et al. Treatment guidelines for hyponatre-
L. V. JuradoHernández and T. A. Allison
Chapter 17
Acute Ischemic Stroke
BrookeBarlow, AndrewJ.Webb, andKarenBerger

17.1 Introductory Case

A 76-year-old man with a past medical history of hypertension, pancreatitis, and hyperlipidemia presents to the emergency department (ED) at 10:16am via emer­gency medical service (EMS) with acute-onset right-sided hemiplegia. He was last seen well at 9:30am that morning by his son, who was traveling with him to a fam­ily party. When the patient attempted to get out of the car, he was unable to stand and the son noted that he had a new right-sided facial droop and slurred speech. Concerned for the signs of a stroke, the son called 911.
In the ED, his initial blood pressure was 170/59mm Hg, his heart rate was 85 beats per minute in normal sinus rhythm, and he had a respiratory rate of 18 with an SpO2 of 100%. On initial exam, he was alert and oriented, followed commands, and had normal horizontal extraocular movements and intact visual elds. His motor exam was notable for mild right-sided facial droop, moderate right lower extremity drift, and mild-to-moderate dysarthria but normal left-sided movement and no loss of sensation, overall scoring 5 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS). A non-contrast head computed tomography (CT) showed age­related parenchymal loss but no intracranial hemorrhage. The patient was diagnosed
B. Barlow Memorial Hermann-The Woodlands Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
A. J. Webb ( Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA e-mail: ajwebb@mgh.harvard.edu
K. Berger Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Switzerland AG 2025 Y. Alzaidi, M. A. Gebily (eds.), The Pharmacist’s Expanded Role in Critical Care Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77335-8_17
*)
437© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
438
B. Barlow et al.
with an acute ischemic stroke and, after conrmation of eligibility and assent, received IV tenecteplase at 10:49am.
In this chapter, we will review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of acute ischemic stroke. Both acute and key secondary prevention therapies will be discussed, including potential complications and monitoring parameters key to the safe implementation of these therapies. A summary of the acute management of ischemic stroke is depicted in Fig.17.1.
Acute Ischemic Stroke
17
439
Fig. 17.1 Acute ischemic stroke treatment algorithm. Acute ischemic stroke must be managed rapidly and efciently for optimal outcomes. Patients presenting with signs and symptoms of acute ischemic stroke should be rapidly assessed and triaged, and treatment should be initiated as soon as possible. Patients with non-disabling symptoms (generally dened as an NIHSS of 3 or less) can receive less emergent treatment but should still be closely monitored for neurologic worsening in which case they may become eligible for advanced therapies. Eligibility for thrombolysis and thrombectomy is discussed extensively throughout the chapter
440
B. Barlow et al.

17.2 Introduction

Stroke remains a global health burden and is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Approximately 795,000 people suffer from a stroke event annually, of which 75% account for rst-time events, with the remaining experiencing a recur­rent attack [1]. According to the American Heart Association’s (AHA) Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics update, stroke accounts for 1 of every 21 deaths in the United States, with one stroke-related death occurring every 3min and 17 s [1]. Of all strokes, acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the most common, accounting for 87% of events, followed by intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) at 10% and subarachnoid hem­orrhage at 3% [1]. Despite the marked advances in AIS management over the past decade, the prevalence of stroke is projected to increase by 20.5% in 2030 compared to 2012 [1]. This increase is proposed to be due to a near doubling in the rates of hypertension and diabetes, highlighting the importance of controlling modiable risk factors for stroke prevention [2].
17.3 Symptoms andPresentation
Early, prompt recognition of stroke symptoms is of utmost importance in AIS to minimize the risk of potentially permanent, disabling long-term sequelae. Several screening tools have been developed to improve the general public’s recognition of stroke symptoms and promote timely triage. Historically, FAST (face, arm, speech, time) was the most commonly used screening tool given its simple structure, ease of use, and high sensitivity (85%) for stroke detection [3]. However, in clinical trials, FAST failed to detect up to 40% of posterior circulation strokes, most notably due to the insensitivity of FAST to visual and gate disturbances [4]. In recognition of these shortcomings, the acronym was expanded to BEFAST (balance, eyes, face, arm, speech, time) to include the visual symptoms and limb ataxia experienced in posterior events to improve symptom recognition. This expansion was estimated to reduce the proportion of missed AIS events from 14% to 4.4% [5].
While these screening tools capture most stroke warning signs, symptom­atology is highly dependent on the effected intracranial vascular territory. For example, an infarct in the left middle cerebral artery would manifest as contra­lateral hemiplegia, hemisensory loss, and expressive aphasia. In contrast, a patient with a basilar artery occlusion could present with depressed conscious­ness, hemi- or quadriparesis, and speech abnormalities accompanied by prodro­mal symptoms of nausea, vertigo, neck stiffness, and headache [6]. Attention should also be drawn to populations likely to present with atypical stroke symp­toms, most notably amongst women and extremes of age [7, 8]. Women are two times more likely to present with atypical stroke symptoms, including loss of consciousness and nausea/vomiting, and have a lower likelihood of presenting with lower extremity paresis [8].
A
cute Ischemic Stroke
17
441
Table 17.1 National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) interpretation [7]
Table 17.2
0 No symptoms 1 No signicant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities despite some symptoms 2 Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance but unable to carry out all
3 Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted 4 Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, or
5 Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent 6 Dead
Modied Rankin scale (mRS)
previous activities
unable to walk unassisted
0 No stroke symptoms 1–4 Minor stroke symptoms 5–15 Moderate stroke symptoms 16–20 Moderate–severe stroke symptoms 21–42 Severe stroke symptoms
Determining stroke severity is important in the initial AIS assessment as it can aid in evaluating a patient’s candidacy for certain treatment options and may predict the likelihood of an underlying large-vessel occlusion [9]. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item neurologic examination scale used as a quantitative assessment tool to measure the degree of stroke-related neurologic de­cits. The score ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating a higher stroke severity (Table17.1) [7]. NIHSS is also used to follow changes in neurologic exami­nation after treatment interventions such as thrombectomy or thrombolysis [7]. Higher scores on the NIHSS correlate with increasing severity of stroke, but it is important to note that the score may underestimate the severity of strokes occurring in the nondominant hemisphere or in the posterior circulation. The mRS is a 7-step ordinal scale which measures the degree of functional disability or dependence in those who experience a stroke (Table17.2). Achieving an mRS of 0–1 at 90days is traditionally considered to be an excellent outcome.

17.4 Pathophysiology

AIS is characterized by a mismatch of oxygen supply and demand in cortical tissue, leading to focal neurologic decits. Insufcient arterial cerebral blood ow (CBF) to brain tissue leads to local ischemia as neurons receive insufcient oxygen to carry out normal cellular respiration, which inevitably leads to cell death if CBF cannot be restored [10]. While stroke was historically a purely clinical diagnosis, advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have allowed for identication of the hyper­acute changes secondary to ischemia within minutes of CBF falling below the isch­emic threshold of 10–20 mL/100 g/min [11]. Early hyperacute changes seen on
442
MRI are referred to as an ischemic core, and the vascular territory surrounding the core that is receiving suboptimal CBF and is at risk of ischemia is referred to as the penumbra. Core tissue is considered unsalvageable unless reperfusion occurs imme­diately, while penumbral tissue can be salvaged with acute therapies. Ischemic lesions tend to follow the vascular territory of the artery involved in the occlusion, apart from hypoperfusion strokes (also known as “watershed” strokes), which tend to cause damage at the border zones between vascular territories.
The cellular mechanisms underpinning cerebral ischemia have been the target of extensive research, both to understand the underlying pathways involved in neuronal cell death and to identify potential therapeutic targets to limit primary and secondary injury after AIS.Insufcient oxygen delivery to neurons leads to an incapacity to trans­port calcium across the cell membrane. Intracellular calcium accumulation paired with an inability to regulate extracellular glutamate concentrations leads to further alterations in cellular ion gradients, intracellular edema, and activation of apoptosis pathways. The accumulation of intracellular ions and excess water and the resulting production of reac­tive oxygen species lead to acidosis, DNA damage, and ultimately programmed cell death [10]. Pharmacotherapeutic agents targeting these pathways have been introduced in clinical trials but have yet to be demonstrated to be benecial in humans.
The etiology of AIS can be broadly categorized into thromboembolic and hemo­dynamic categories. Thromboembolic strokes occur due to an abrupt cessation of CBF caused by either an embolus (such as a cardioembolism caused by atrial bril­lation) or a thrombosis (such as via stenosis caused by atherosclerosis). Hemodynamic strokes are less common and occur when blood supply to the brain is insufcient to meet cerebral demands. This can occur during prolonged hypoten­sion because of increased cerebral metabolic demand or a mismatch in arterial blood ow between ischemic and nonischemic brain regions (“reversed Robin Hood syndrome”). Stroke etiologies are often further subdivided into the TOAST (Trial of Org 10172in Acute Stroke Treatment Trial) criteria, categorizing strokes as caused by either large-artery atherosclerosis, cardioembolism, small-vessel disease, other determined etiology, or undetermined etiology (also referred to as cryptogenic or stroke of unknown source) [12]. While the acute management of AIS is largely similar across etiologies, determination of the cause of a stroke is critical to the selection of appropriate secondary stroke prevention therapy and is a core objective of index admission after AIS [13].
B. Barlow et al.

17.5 Acute Therapies

17.5.1 Thrombolytic Therapy

Intravenous thrombolysis is the cornerstone of acute therapy for patients with AIS.Thrombolytics catalyze the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, a proteo­lytic enzyme responsible for breaking the cross-links between brin and destabiliz­ing clot integrity. Dissolution of the brin-rich thrombus with thrombolytics restores
17 Acute Ischemic Stroke
443
blood ow and perfusion to ischemic areas and, if administered within a timely fashion, mitigates the risk of irreversible ischemic damage [14]. Alteplase (r-tPA) was the rst FDA-approved thrombolytic for AIS based on the results of the 1995 NINDS trial, which demonstrated a 30% increased likelihood of a favorable func­tional outcome as measured on the modied Rankin scale (mRS) at 90days com­pared to placebo [15]. The NINDS trial, in combination with the ECASS-III trial [16], established alteplase as the standard of care in eligible patients with AIS.The benets of treatment are directly linked to the expediency of treatment initiation after last known well (LKW) [17]. When thrombolysis is initiated within 0–3h of LKW, the number needed to treat (NNT) is estimated to be 10 for one patient to achieve an excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1) at 90days. The NNT increases to 19 when treatment is initiated within 3–4.5h of LKW, emphasizing the critical importance of timely initiation in eligible patients. Thrombolysis signicantly increases the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) compared to pla­cebo, but the long-term benets of thrombolysis outweigh the risks in eligible patients.
Prolonged ischemic injury leads to capillary cell apoptosis, increased vascular permeability, inammation, and oxidative stress, enhancing the risk of hemorrhagic transformation [18]. Thus, treatment initiation beyond 4.5h is not recommended given the potential for higher rates of intracranial bleeding [7, 18]. However, advancements have been made in the subgroup of “wake-up” strokes, which were historically considered a contraindication to thrombolytic therapy given the unknown time of symptom onset and potential for a completed infarct. A series of trials evaluated the use of advanced imaging techniques using diffusion-weighted imaging MRI with uid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence or CT perfusion to identify the presence of a salvageable penumbra amenable for interven­tion with thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy [7, 19, 20]. A meta-analysis of three randomized trials evaluating the use of thrombolysis in patients with AIS presenting within 4.5–9 h of LKW who underwent advanced imaging to identify perfusion mismatches revealed that a higher proportion of patients achieved an excellent func­tional outcome with alteplase compared to placebo, demonstrating that careful patient selection could extend the window of eligibility [20].
Patients presenting with symptoms of AIS must be rapidly assessed for eligibil­ity and contraindications to thrombolysis. Patients presenting within 4.5h of LKW or within 9h of LKW with perfusion mismatch on advanced imaging and who have disabling stroke symptoms (traditionally dened as an NIHSS >5) are considered potentially eligible for thrombolysis. The 2019 AHA/ASA Acute Stroke Guidelines provide a Level IA recommendation for thrombolysis within 3h of LKW, Level IB-R for thrombolysis within 4.5h of LKW, and Level IIa B-R for thrombolysis in the extended window for eligible patients [7]. Contraindications must be carefully evaluated prior to therapy, however, to ensure that the benets outweigh the risk of such therapy. A full list of contraindications to thrombolytics is given in Table17.3.
While alteplase has historically been the thrombolytic of choice for AIS, its com­plex dosing and long administration time have prompted investigation into alterna­tive thrombolytics. Tenecteplase is a third-generation thrombolytic genetically
444
Table 17.3 Absolute and relative contraindications to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke [7]
Absolute contraindications Relative contraindications
Presentation >4.5h after onset (without the capability to determine extended-window eligibility)
BP sustained >185/110mm hg despite treatment Major surgery or serious non-head trauma in
Current or history of intracranial hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage
Intracranial or spinal surgery, serious head trauma, or previous stroke within 3months
Active internal bleeding Acute pericarditis Intracranial, gastric, or intra-axial intracranial
neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation Bleeding diathesis (INR >1.7, aPTT >40s,
platelets <100,000/mm Anticoagulation use—INR >1.7, DOAC use
within 48h, recipient of therapeutic-dose UFH or LMWH
Conrmed/suspected endocarditis or aortic arch dissection
Recent gastrointestinal bleed (<21days)
Table 17.4 Comparison of alteplase and tenecteplase
FDA approval AIS (0–3h), PE, acute myocardial infarction
Product availability
Final concentration
Fibrin specicity ++ ++++ Pharmacokinetics PAI-1 resistance: Low
Stroke dosing 0.9mg/kg (max 90mg) 0.25mg/kg (max
Administration 10% as IV bolus over 1min, remainder as
3
)
Alteplase (rt-PA) Tenecteplase (TNK)
(MI) 50mg, 100mg vial 50mg vial
1mg/mL 5mg/mL
Half-life: 5min
60-min IV infusion
Recent gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding more than 21days prior to presentation
previous 14days Acute seizure at stroke onset
Pregnancy
Minor or rapidly improving symptoms
Recent myocardial infarction (<3months)
Arterial puncture at noncompressible site within 7days
Initial blood glucose <50 or >400mg/dL
Acute MI (off-label for AIS)
PAI-1 resistance: High Half-life: 22min
25mg) IV push over 5s
B. Barlow et al.
modied to possess a 15-fold higher brin specicity and an 80-fold increased resistance to plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), an enzyme responsible for the inactivation of tissue plasminogen activator [21]. The increased resistance to PAI-1 signicantly prolongs the half-life of tenecteplase, allowing tenecteplase to be administered as an intravenous bolus compared to a bolus plus infusion [21]. Furthermore, the enhanced brin specicity prevents systemic brin degradation and may reduce the risk of bleeding (Table17.4). The practical advantages of the simplied preparation and ease of administration with tenecteplase may translate to
17 Acute Ischemic Stroke
445
improved door-to-needle times and help expedite patient transfer to thrombectomy­capable centers [22].
Several studies have compared the safety and efcacy of tenecteplase to alteplase in doses ranging from 0.1 to 0.4mg/kg. Initial studies were conducted in patients with large-vessel occlusions (LVOs) who were also eligible for mechanical throm­bectomy. The EXTEND-IA TNK trial enrolled patients with LVO within a 4.5-h time window to 0.25mg/kg of tenecteplase (maximum dose of 25mg) vs. alteplase
0.9mg/kg (maximum dose of 90 mg). The proportion of patients who achieved >50% reperfusion in the involved ischemic region was higher in the tenecteplase group at 22% compared to only 10% in those who received alteplase (p=0.002). Tenecteplase also resulted in improved 90-day functional outcomes (median mRS 2 vs. 3, p=0.04) with no differences in the rates of sICH.Several large RCTs con­ducted outside of the LVO cohort (AcT, TRACE-2, and others), have demonstrated non-inferiority in functional outcomes between alteplase and tenecteplase with no notable differences in bleeding events [23]. Notably, higher tenecteplase doses (0.4mg/kg) have been shown to increase sICH rates and lead to worse functional outcomes [24]. Therefore, the recommended dosing for tenecteplase in AIS is
0.25mg/kg (maximum of 25mg) administered as a single intravenous bolus over 5s. The 2019 AHA/ASA guidelines suggest that tenecteplase may be reasonable as an alternative to alteplase in those who are eligible for thrombolysis and who are also eligible to undergo mechanical thrombectomy [7]. These guidelines were however published before a majority of this research was conducted, and future renditions of the guidelines are likely to incorporate recommendations for tenecteplase that reect the latest data. The 2023 European Stroke Organization (ESO) developed expedited expert consensus recommendations for the use of tenecteplase in AIS and provided a strong recommendation with moderate quality of evidence for use of tenecteplase as an alternative thrombolytic to alteplase in AIS for those who present within the 4.5-h time window [25].

17.5.2 Thrombectomy

Where thrombolytic therapy aims to pharmacologically dissolve culprit lesions causing ischemia, patients with visualized LVOs of the major cerebral vessels may also be eligible for endovascular thrombectomy to mechanically achieve reperfu­sion. Intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT) has evolved dramatically over the last two decades and has been established as the most effective acute therapy for AIS in eli­gible patients. First-generation thrombectomy devices included either direct cathe­ter aspiration or clot retrieval and were associated with increased rates of arterial reperfusion over intravenous thrombolytic administration alone, but the improved functional outcomes seen with second-generation stent retriever devices solidied IAT as the standard of care [26, 27]. Stent retrievers deploy a exible stent into the target thrombus and expand the stent so that the thrombus becomes lodged within the stent, and the stent is then retracted. A patient-level meta-analysis of ve