Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_759_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
47 Мб
Скачать
48
Fig. 5.4 Saline infusion sonohysterogram demonstrating intrauterine adhesive disease. Note that the uterine cavity does not distend uniformly with saline in these cases
J. Reckhow and Z. Khan

Recognition

The presence of intrauterine adhesions may be suspected in patients who present with cyclic or chronic pelvic pain, amenorrhea, light menstrual bleeding or other menstrual irregularities, and infertility with or without recurrent pregnancy loss, particularly in those with a history of prior instrumentation of the endometrium [39]. A thin endometrial stripe may be noted on standard two­dimensional pelvic ultrasonography. Saline infu­sion sonohysterogram is the most sensitive imaging modality for identifying IUA (Fig.5.4) [40, 41]. Denitive diagnosis requires direct visualization of intrauterine adhesions by hyster­oscopy [42].

Management

Surgical management is indicated in symptom­atic patients and may improve future fertility out­comes in those affected by infertility and/or recurrent pregnancy loss. Hysteroscopic lysis of
adhesions, either in the ofce or outpatient surgi­cal setting, is the gold standard treatment for intrauterine adhesive disease [43]. When lysing adhesions, the surgeon should use gentle blunt dissection when possible (for example, allowing distention of the uterus or the tip of the hystero­scope to break apart lmy adhesions) and favor the use of cold instruments such as hysteroscopic scissors to minimize the risk of injury to healthy endometrium [44]. Electrosurgical instruments should be used sparingly but may be essential for hemostasis in some cases. Hysteroscopic morcel­lator devices may be useful for the resection of excess tissue in patients with retained products of conception or endometrial polyps. In general, adhesiolysis should begin at the internal cervical os with careful progression towards the fundus, beginning with centrally located adhesions before progressing laterally and nally to the uterine cornua [21]. Filmy adhesions should be addressed rst (Fig. 5.5a–b). Fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance may be utilized in particularly chal­lenging cases to minimize the risk of uterine per­foration or entry into myometrial tissue [45].
ab
5 Uterine Surgery forInfertility
Fig. 5.5 (a–b) Hysteroscopic view of intrauterine adhesive disease before (a) and after (b) hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
49

Uterine Perforation

appropriate path is taken. Transabdominal or transvaginal ultrasound guidance may also be

Background

utilized to prevent the formation of a false pas­sage and uterine perforation. Electrosurgical
Uterine perforation occurs in 0.1–4% of gyneco­logic procedures that involve instrumentation of the uterine cavity and may occur with the use of
instruments should only be activated when the operator has a clear view and control of the active instrument tip [48].
blunt, sharp, and heated instruments (Fig.5.6a–
b). The risk of perforation may be increased in
cases of difcult entry, including in the setting of

Recognition

acute version and/or exion of the uterus, cervi­cal stenosis, nulliparity, and prior pelvic surgery or cervical procedures [4648]. The recently gravid uterus may also be more susceptible to uterine perforation due to myometrial relaxation.
Uterine perforation is often recognized by the tactile sensation of a loss of resistance or entry of an instrument beyond a reasonable depth. It may also be recognized visually with ultrasound or hysteroscopy. During hysteroscopy, rapid loss of visualization or collapse of the uterine cavity

Prevention

suggests perforation [50]. If the procedure is per­formed with the assistance of a uid management
Many cases of uterine perforation can be pre­vented by careful instrumentation. In cases where
system, a sudden increase in uid decit can also be seen in cases of uterine perforation.
cervical stenosis is anticipated, preoperative misoprostol may decrease the risk of perforation during dilation of the cervix [49]. Deep intracer-

Management

vical injection of vasopressin in these cases decreases the force required for cervical dilation [47]. Finally, if the external cervical os is dilated, the hysteroscope can be utilized for hydrodilation under direct visualization to ensure that the
In the event of uterine perforation, a period of extended observation is appropriate to monitor for signs of possible bleeding, increased pain, and infection. When secondary to blunt instru-
50
Dilator vs bipolar
Anteverted uterus
Retroverted uterus
Fig. 5.6 (a–b) Uterine perforation occurs when an instrument passes through the wall of the uterus (a). Uterine perforation is most likely to occur through the posterior wall in the anteexed uterus, and through the anterior well in the retroexed uterus (b)
J. Reckhow and Z. Khan
hysteroscopic instrument
ab
Arrow indicates direction of travel of device
mentation there is a low risk of bleeding or vis­ceral injury, and observation is typically sufcient. If there is concern for possible viscus or other intrabdominal injury, diagnostic laparos­copy should be performed to assess the abdomi-
Vagina
Cervix
nal cavity [51, 52]. If perforation occurred secondary to a sharp or heated instrument, diag­nostic laparoscopy is recommended as the risk for intraabdominal bleeding, and visceral injury is higher with these instruments [46].
5 Uterine Surgery forInfertility
51
Uterine Rupture andAbnormal Placentation

Background

Uterine rupture and abnormal placentation are extremely rare but potentially catastrophic preg­nancy complications that may occur as a result of myometrial thinning after surgical intervention as well as disruption of the junctional zone and scar tissue formation between the endometrium and myometrium following myomectomy or ade­nomyomectomy [53]. The risk of uterine rupture may be increased after myomectomy, adenomyo­mectomy, hysteroscopic curettage, and hystero­scopic septoplasty and is estimated to occur in
0.1–1% of these cases, consistent with the risk incurred after one or two low transverse Cesarean births [54]. The risk appears to be highest among patients who undergo laparoscopic as opposed to open myomectomy, and this is suspected to be due to less optimal closure of the myometrial defect with the minimally invasive approach [55,
56]. The risk for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS)
is highest in patients with prior full-thickness uterine surgery, such as extensive myomectomy or adenomyomectomy but may be as high as 2% among patients who have undergone hystero­scopic intrauterine adhesiolysis [57]. Additionally, it is important to remember that the pathophysiology of adenomyosis, with the for­mation of stula-like canals within the myome­trium, may predispose to PAS as well [58].

Prevention

Proper surgical technique facilitates effective healing after invasive uterine surgery. Multilayer closure of the myometrium and judicious use of electrosurgery decrease the risk of uterine rup­ture after myomectomy and adenomyomectomy [5961]. The Use of barbed suture helps with obtaining close reapproximation of the myoma bed, reducing hematoma formation and promot­ing efcient wound healing [3]. Planned late pre­term Cesarean birth is recommended in pregnancies after extensive myomectomy, par­ticularly if it is transmural or enters the endome-
trial cavity, and after adenomomectomy due to the increased risk of uterine rupture in these patients [62].
The prevention of catastrophic complications of uterine rupture and abnormal placentation relies on early recognition of these pathologies. Patients with a history of prior uterine surgery should undergo detailed obstetric ultrasonogra­phy to evaluate placentation in the second trimes­ter. Further evaluation with MRI is recommended if PAS is suspected [63]. Screening should also be considered in patients with signicant ante­partum bleeding or uterine pain, as these symp­toms may reect abnormal placentation or thinning of the uterine wall [64]. Catastrophic complications of PAS, including life-threatening hemorrhage, uterine rupture, and need for emer­gent delivery with postpartum hysterectomy, can be prevented with judicious antepartum monitor­ing and planned medically indicated preterm birth at a facility with hysterectomy capabilities [65].

Recognition

The earliest sign of uterine rupture is usually fetal heart rate changes; however, suspicion should be raised in the event of loss of fetal station during labor, sudden onset severe abdominal pain with or without vaginal bleeding, and loss of intrauter­ine pressure [53]. As previously discussed, PAS is ideally identied in the antenatal period on imaging. If not previously recognized, it may be diagnosed at the time of delivery as the placenta will fail to separate and no plane will be appreci­ated between the placenta and the uterine wall. These cases may present with uterine atony and postpartum hemorrhage as well [53].

Management

Uterine rupture is an obstetric emergency and requires immediate birth via Cesarean delivery. Depending on patient stability and the extent of the rupture repair of the uterus may be possible, although hysterectomy is often required [66]. PAS is commonly managed by planned Cesarean
52
Distentio
J. Reckhow and Z. Khan
hysterectomy (please see Chap. 30, Cesarean Hysterectomy, for additional details about this procedure). In appropriate cases, the placenta may be left in situ at the time of delivery with plan for close interim monitoring and interval removal after placental involution [67, 68].
Volume Overload withHysteroscopic Procedures

Background

Modern-day hysteroscopy utilizes distension media for expansion of the uterine cavity to allow for visualization and targeted treatment of intra­uterine pathology. Though generally considered a low-risk procedure, hysteroscopy can precipitate major hemodynamic complications, particularly in the setting of suboptimal uid management.

Prevention

An automated uid management system should be utilized to allow for objective tracking of absorption of distention media (Fig. 5.7). Procedures should be completed expeditiously by skilled surgeons and should be performed at the lowest possible uid pressure that allows for adequate visualization (usually 60–80 mmHg) [48]. Intravascular hydration should be kept to a minimum during the procedure to minimize cumulative uid intake. When a complex proce­dure is anticipated, intracervical injection of vasopressin may be considered as vasoconstric­tion may further decrease intravascular uid absorption during the case [69].
n
media
Outflow collection cannister
Fig. 5.7 Demonstration of a typical simple hysteroscopy uid management system
Inflow
Outflow
Hysteroscope
5 Uterine Surgery forInfertility
53

Recognition

Pulmonary and cerebral edema may develop rap­idly with overabsorption of distention media and are typically rst detected by new onset ventila-

Management

Table 5.2 highlights management recommenda­tions for complications that may arise with com­monly used distention media.
tion difculty, crackles or rales on pulmonary auscultation, brady- or tachyarrhythmias, altered mental status, and hypotension. These conditions frequently develop during or shortly after the procedure is completed or terminated [48, 70].
Table 5.2 Media Selection and Considerations for Hysteroscopy
Type of Media Electrolyte-rich Electrolyte-poor Gaseous
Examples Normal saline (isotonic)
Lactated Ringer’s (isotonic)
Uses Diagnostic or operative
hysteroscopy in which mechanical, laser, or bipolar energy sources are used
Advantages Low cost
Readily available in most clinical settings Good electrical conductor so can be used with bipolar energy sources
Disadvantages Cannot be used with monopolar
energy sources
Maximum uid decit
2500cc. Consider terminating procedure at 2000cc
1.5% glycine (hypotonic)
2.5–5% sorbitol (hypotonic) 5% Mannitol (hypotonic) Dextran 70 (hypertonic)
Operative hysteroscopy with monopolar electrosurgery only
Does not conduct electricity so can safely be used with monopolar energy sources Due to high viscosity, dextran does not readily spill into the peritoneal cavity or mix with blood Allows for better visualization in bleeding scenarios as blood does not mix with the distension medium
Cannot be used with bipolar energy sources Allergy and contraindications are more common
1000cc for hypotonic solutions. Consider terminating procedure at 750cc. 500cc for high-viscosity solutions. Consider terminating procedure at 300cc.
CO
2
Diagnostic hysteroscopy only, primarily in the ofce setting
Low cost Conducts light well so provides optimal visualization Readily absorbed into bloodstream and removed via pulmonary ventilation so risk of accumulation is low
Uneven distention of the uterine cavity, inability to clear secretions, and blood can result in poor visualization
N/A
(continued)
54
Table 5.2 (continued)
Type of Media Electrolyte-rich Electrolyte-poor Gaseous
Major risks Excessive uid absorption can
cause isotonic volume overload, pulmonary edema, and congestive heart failure Air embolism is uncommon but may occur when ambient pressure is greater than diastolic venous pressure.
Prevention Volume overload: Prevent with
continuous inow–outow monitoring Air embolism: Minimize duration and extent of Trendelenburg positioning; remove speculum once hysteroscope is inserted into the uterus and limit reinstrumentation to minimize exposure of the dilated cervix to the air; clear air from inow tracts of hysteroscope
Recognition Volume overload: Decreasing
oxygen saturation, crackles on pulmonary auscultation Air embolism: Chest pain and dyspnea, decreased end tidal CO2, hypotension, tachycardia, mill-wheel murmur on cardiac auscultation
Excessive absorption can cause euvolemic hyponatremia and decreased serum osmolality, increasing the risk for seizures, cerebral edema, coma, and death. Glycine is metabolized into ammonia and glycol, which can cross the blood–brain barrier resulting in hyperammonemia. Sorbitol and mannitol have diuretic effects and may cause severe dehydration and subsequent hypotension and circulatory collapse
Prevent volume overload and rapid intravasation with continuous inow–outow monitoring. Consider intracervical injection of vasopressin to minimize intravascular uid absorption.
Hyponatremia: Muscle twitching, hypotension, tachycardia, seizures Hyperammonemia: Agitation, somnolence, dizziness, visual disturbances, vomiting, coma
J. Reckhow and Z. Khan
Gas embolism
Maintain low distention pressure (<100mmHg) and minimize operative time. Never use a laparoscopic insufator in place of a hysteroscopic insufator as the ow rates differ between these devices.
Early signs: Cardiac arrhythmia, rising end-tidal CO2, decreasing oxygen saturation Early symptoms: Chest pain, shortness of breath Late signs: Sudden drop in oxygen saturation, hypotension, pulmonary hypertension, hypercarbia, tachypnea
(continued)
5 Uterine Surgery forInfertility
Table 5.2 (continued)
Type of Media Electrolyte-rich Electrolyte-poor Gaseous
Management Fluid restriction and diuretics Hyponatremia: Fluid
restriction and care by intensive care specialist for hyponatremia. Under the intensivists’ care, slow correction with isotonic or hypertonic saline could be considered. Hyperammonemia: Consider administration of lactulose and/or rifaximin, consult internal medicine or critical care for assistance in management
55
Immediately terminate the procedure. With the assistance of anesthesia colleagues, place patient on mechanical ventilation with 100% FiO2, place patient in left lateral decubitus position and in steep Trendelenburg to minimize gas embolism travel to the pulmonary circulation. Consider: IV uid resuscitation with normal saline, placement of a central line to help remove air from the right atrium, pericardial thump to help break up larger gas bubbles
Diminished Ovarian Reserve andLoss ofOvary

Background

Surgery for infertility often includes intervention on the ovary so it is important to consider ovarian surgery when discussing complications of surgery for infertility. Common adnexal pathologies seen in reproductive-aged individuals include physio­logic ovarian cysts, endometriomas, mature terato­mas (dermoid tumors), and other benign ovarian neoplasms such as cystadenomas. Minimally inva­sive ovarian cystectomy is the gold standard for the management of these pathologies. In many cases, such as with endometriomas and dermoid tumors, disease may be bilateral or recurrent. This makes conservative surgery even more desirable, as future oophorectomy may be required [71]. While an initial decline in serum anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) is noted after surgery, levels return to normal within 3–6months in most cases and within 12months for endometriomas; ovarian cystectomy does not appear to have a meaningful
long- term impact on ovarian reserve or live birth rates [7277]. In patients with endometriosis who desire future fertility, removal of ovarian endome­triomas >4 cm in size improves pregnancy rates [78]. This benet may not be seen with excision of smaller endometriomas, and treatment of disease with coagulation or laser evaporation without pseudocapsule excision increases the risk of cyst recurrence and associated symptoms hence is not recommended [79].

Prevention

Benign lesions of the ovary should be removed via cystectomy performed by an appropriately skilled surgeon. Techniques to facilitate dissec­tion of the cyst wall include the use of hydrodis­section and injection of dilute vasopressin (0.1–1 unit/mL) once the plane of the cyst is identied [80]. If there is concern for oophorec­tomy, surgery should be performed by a skilled reproductive surgeon to maximize the likelihood of successful ovarian preservation [81].
56
J. Reckhow and Z. Khan

Recognition

It is important to recognize that bleeding is expected during cystectomy and that ovarian cys­tectomy is a technically more complex procedure than oophorectomy in most cases [82].

Management

Preventing loss of ovarian function and loss of ovary at the time of ovarian surgery requires patience and judicious hemostasis. Hemostatic agents should be preferentially used for low­volume oozing of the cystectomy bed, and suture or electrosurgical techniques may be required to control higher volume bleeds [83]. The choice of hemostatic agent should be per provider prefer­ence as there is no difference in ovarian reserve outcomes with different agents [18, 84, 85]. Use of monopolar energy should be minimized as dif­fuse dispersion of energy throughout the ovary may result in injury to healthy tissue; bipolar or ultrasonic energy sources should be favored if electrosurgical hemostasis is required [73, 86]. Ovarian suturing for the purpose of hemostasis results in improved immediate post-operative ovarian function preservation, although long­term ovarian reserve outcomes are the same [87,
88]. If oophorectomy is required, the patient
should be offered consultation with a reproduc­tive endocrinologist to discuss options for fertil­ity preservation, including ovarian tissue cryopreservation [8994].

References

1. Kim T, Purdy MP, Kendall-Rauchfuss L, Habermann EB, Bews KA, Glasgow AE, et al. Myomectomy associated blood transfusion risk and morbidity after surgery. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(1):175–84.
2. Altgassen C, Kuss S, Berger U, Löning M, Diedrich K, Schneider A.Complications in laparoscopic myo­mectomy. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(4):614–8.
3. Tanos V, Berry KE, Frist M, Campo R, DeWilde RL. Prevention and Management of Complications in laparoscopic myomectomy. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:8250952.
4. Sizzi O, Rossetti A, Malzoni M, Minelli L, La Grotta F, Soranna L, etal. Italian multicenter study on com­plications of laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(4):453–62.
5. Mirowska-Allen K, Kong K, Ang C. Unplanned hysterectomy following myomectomy at a ter­tiary institution: a case series and review of the literature. J Endometr Pelv Pain Disorder. 2018;10:228402651878366.
6. Lewis EI, Gargiulo AR. The role of Hysteroscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy in the setting of infertility. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;59(1):53–65.
7. Lethaby A, Puscasiu L, Vollenhoven B.Preoperative medical therapy before surgery for uterine broids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11(11):Cd000547.
8. Simko S, Dallas K, Molina AL, Siedhoff MT, Wright KN, Anger JT, et al. Rates of complications and reoperation after myomectomy-the impact of surgi­cal approach: a statewide population-based cohort study from 2005-2018. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29(10):1157–64.
9. Zaritsky E, Le A, Tucker LY, Ojo A, Weintraub MR, Raine-Bennett T. Minimally invasive myomectomy: practice trends and differences between Black and non-Black women within a large integrated health­care system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(6):826. e1–e11.
10. Alomar O, Abu-Zaid A, Jamjoom MZ, Almubarki AA, Alsehaimi SO, Alabdrabalamir S, et al. Prophylactic vasopressin to reduce intraoperative blood loss and associated morbidities during myo­mectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 controlled trials. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022;51(10):102485.
11. Barbosa PA, Villaescusa M, Andres MP, Fernandes LFC, Abrão MS.How to minimize bleeding in lapa­roscopic myomectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021;33(4):255–61.
12. Srivastava S, Mahey R, Kachhawa G, Bhatla N, Upadhyay AD, Kriplani A. Comparison of intra­myometrial vasopressin plus rectal misoprostol with intramyometrial vasopressin alone to decrease blood loss during laparoscopic myomectomy: randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;228:279–83.
13. Lu C, Corbett C, Elliott JE, Evans D.Fertility-sparing surgery for diffuse adenomyosis: a narrated, step­wise approach to the Osada procedure. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(3):588–90.
14. Wu H, Singh B, Yen TT, Maher J, Datta S, Chaves K, etal. Utilization and cost of cell salvage in minimally invasive myomectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;280:179–83.
15. Kumakiri J, Kikuchi I, Kitade M, Matsuoka S, Kono A, Takeda S.Retrospective analysis of the efcacy of perioperative use of the cell salvage and autologous blood recovery system during laparoscopic myomec­tomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(4):1073–7.
5 Uterine Surgery forInfertility
57
16. Li XL, Wan XJ, Zhang Q, Zhu H, Zhou K, Yang XJ, etal. Laparoscopic myomectomy complicated by dis­seminated intravascular coagulation: a case report and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;155(1):115–6.
17. Bar-Natan M, Hymes KB. Management of Intraoperative Coagulopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29(4):557–65.
18. Cullifer RM, Makai G, Pacis M, Huynh T. Topical hemostatic and tissue-sealing agents in gyne­cologic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;32(4):285–91.
19. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Topical hemo­static agents at time of obstetric and gynecologic sur­gery: ACOG committee opinion, number 812. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(4):e81-e9.
20. Stachowicz AM, Whiteside JL. Topical hemostatic agents in gynecologic surgery for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(2):463–8.
21. Khan Z, Goldberg JM. Hysteroscopic Management of Asherman’s syndrome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(2):218–28.
22. Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E, Li TC.Asherman syndrome—one century later. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):759–79.
23. Poujade O, Grossetti A, Mougel L, Ceccaldi PF, Ducarme G, Luton D. Risk of synechiae follow­ing uterine compression sutures in the manage­ment of major postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG. 2011;118(4):433–9.
24. Rasheed SM, Amin MM, Abd Ellah AH, Abo Elhassan AM, El Zahry MA, Wahab HA. Reproductive per­formance after conservative surgical treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124(3):248–52.
25. Schenker JG, Margalioth EJ.Intrauterine adhesions: an updated appraisal. Fertil Steril. 1982;37(5):593–610.
26. Hooker AB, Lemmers M, Thurkow AL, Heymans MW, Opmeer BC, Brolmann HA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk factors and long­term reproductive outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(2):262–78.
27. Taskin O, Sadik S, Onoglu A, Gokdeniz R, Erturan E, Burak F, etal. Role of endometrial suppression on the frequency of intrauterine adhesions after resec­toscopic surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7(3):351–4.
28. Mara M, Horak P, Kubinova K, Dundr P, Belsan T, Kuzel D. Hysteroscopy after uterine broid embo­lization: evaluation of intrauterine ndings in 127 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;38(5):823–31.
29. Healy MW, Schexnayder B, Connell MT, Terry N, AH DC, Csokmay JM, et al. Intrauterine adhe­sion prevention after hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2016;215(3):267–75.e7.
30. Bosteels J, Weyers S, D’Hooghe TM, Torrance H, Broekmans FJ, Chua SJ, et al. Anti-adhesion ther­apy following operative hysteroscopy for treatment of female subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11(11):Cd011110.
31. Huchon C, Drioueche H, Koskas M, Agostini A, Bauville E, Bourdel N, et al. Operative hysteros­copy vs vacuum aspiration for incomplete sponta­neous abortion: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;329(14):1197–205.
32. Orhue AA, Aziken ME, Igbefoh JO. A compari­son of two adjunctive treatments for intrauterine adhesions following lysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;82(1):49–56.
33. Lin XN, Zhou F, Wei ML, Yang Y, Li Y, Li TC, etal. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the efcacy of intrauterine balloon and intrauterine contracep­tive device in the prevention of adhesion reforma­tion after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(1):235–40.
34. Lin X, Wei M, Li TC, Huang Q, Huang D, Zhou F, et al. A comparison of intrauterine balloon, intra­uterine contraceptive device and hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of adhesion reformation follow­ing hysteroscopic surgery for Asherman syndrome: a cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(2):512–6.
35. Acunzo G, Guida M, Pellicano M, Tommaselli GA, Di Spiezio SA, Bifulco G, etal. Effectiveness of auto­cross- linked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesioly­sis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(9):1918–21.
36. Tsapanos VS, Stathopoulou LP, Papathanassopoulou VS, Tzingounis VA. The role of Sepralm biore­sorbable membrane in the prevention and therapy of endometrial synechiae. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(1):10–4.
37. Farhi J, Bar-Hava I, Homburg R, Dicker D, Ben­Rafael Z.Induced regeneration of endometrium fol­lowing curettage for abortion: a comparative study. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(7):1143–4.
38. Sanlippo JS, Fitzgerald MR, Badawy SZ, Nussbaum ML, Yussman MA. Asherman’s syndrome. A com­parison of therapeutic methods. J Reprod Med. 1982;27(6):328–30.
39. Hanstede MM, van der Meij E, Goedemans L, Emanuel MH. Results of centralized Asherman sur­gery, 2003–2013. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(6):1561–8. e1.
40. Sylvestre C, Child TJ, Tulandi T, Tan SL. A pro­spective study to evaluate the efcacy of two­and three-dimensional sonohysterography in women with intrauterine lesions. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(5):1222–5.
41. Seshadri S, El-Toukhy T, Douiri A, Jayaprakasan K, Khalaf Y. Diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonography in the evaluation of uterine cavity abnor-