Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_759_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
47 Мб
Скачать
234
IVC
Aorta
d
Fig. 22.1 Visualization of the ureteral course at the pel-
J. Shearer et al.

Hemorrhagic Complications During Rectopexy

Fig. 22.2 The presacral
L5
S1
S2
LCIV
Middle sacral artery
Rectosigmoi
22 Operations forRectal Prolapse
235
Fig. 22.3 Ventral mesh rectopexy includes mobilizing

Mesh Complications

236
J. Shearer et al.

Discitis

22 Operations forRectal Prolapse

Intra-Abdominal Collections/ Seromas/Abscesses

237

Bowel Obstruction

Ureteral Injury

Anastomotic Leaks

238

Postoperative Pain

Perineal Surgery

J. Shearer et al.
22 Operations forRectal Prolapse
Table 22.2 Common complications of perineal rectal

Multicompartment Prolapse Repairs

239

Conclusions

Postoperative Constipation/Fecal Impaction

References

240
J. Shearer et al.
22 Operations forRectal Prolapse
241
Complications ofMinimally Invasive Surgery
DandiHuang andKennethH.Kim
23
Trocar Injury: Vascular andBowel Injuries

Background

Abdominal entry is often the most dangerous step of minimally invasive surgery and accounts for approximately 50% of serious laparoscopic complications such as visceral and vascular inju­ries as well as medico-legal litigations [13]. Even though the rate of complication with the rst trocar entry is only about 1%, laparoscopic trocars are still the most common device named in these litigations, making up one-third of all claims [3]. Multiple methods of entry exist, such as direct entry, Veress needle (VN) entry, and Hassan (open) entry.
This section will focus on trocar-related inju­ries. It is important to note that a Cochrane review showed no difference in safety of one technique over another [3]. The 2023 Cochrane review also compared blind VN and direct trocar insertion (DTI) and found no difference in the rate of bowel or major vascular injury. DTI was associ­ated with a lower risk of omental bleeding, omen­tal emphysema, subcutaneous emphysema, and
D. Huang · K. H. Kim (*) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, USA e-mail: dandi.huang@cshs.org;
kenneth.kim3@cshs.org
extraperitoneal insufation. Additionally, no sin­gle study has compared the different trocar types (i.e., radially expanding, conical blunt-shaped, single-bladed, cutting trocar, etc.). The existing data comparing visceral injury, vascular injury, trocar site herniation, trocar site bleeding, and postoperative pain of different trocar types have low quality of evidence [4]. We will focus on two of the most serious complications here, which are vascular and bowel injuries.

Prevention

Entry sites should be carefully chosen based on the patient’s surgical history and likelihood of abdominal adhesions. The left upper quadrant (Palmer’s point) should be considered if lower abdominal adhesions are anticipated. A nasogas­tric tube should be placed with left upper quadrant entry to decompress the stomach, decreasing the risk of gastric injury. The risk of major vascular injury can be decreased in most cases by introduc­ing instruments at an approximately 45° angle from the plane of the patient’s spine in the supine position (Figure 23.1a,b), as Trendelenburg can distort this angle [5]. For secondary ports, place­ment about 8 cm laterally from the midline can help avoid injury to the abdominal wall vessels. Once the initial trocar is placed, it is prudent to place the remaining trocars under direct visualiza­tion with a laparoscopic camera.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 M. Hoffman et al. (eds.), Major Complications of Female Pelvic Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66772-5_23
245
246
Re
Bladder
Midline
t
D. Huang and K. H. Kim
ab
Bladder
Uterus
Rectum
ctum
Uterus
Fig. 23.1 (a, b) Incorrect and correct angels of midline trocar placement
Incorrec
Correct

Recognition

Early recognition of vascular and bowel injuries is of critical importance due to the high morbidity and mortality associated with such injuries.
Injuries to the abdominal wall vessels occur in
0.3–2.5% of procedures, and about half of these injuries affect the inferior epigastric vessels. More seriously, vascular injury to a major retro­peritoneal vessel occurs in 0.3–1.0% of all proce­dures and accounts for 74–82% of all laparoscopy-related deaths [512]. The rate of major vascular injury during initial entry is
0.05–0.5%, and trocars account for 54–83% of these. The sites of vascular injury in decreasing frequency are the iliac vein, greater omental ves­sels, inferior vena cava, aorta, pelvic, and supe­rior mesenteric veins, and lumbar veins.
The incidence of bowel injury ranges from
0.03 to 0.18% and accounts for 19% of deaths from trocar-related injury. Bowel injury occurs most frequently during entry (41.8%), and the sites of bowel injury in decreasing frequency are
the small bowel (55.8%), large intestine (38.6%), and stomach (3.9%) [1315].
Vascular Injury
Trocar injury to a major vessel will almost always result in brisk bleeding, regardless of whether the bleeding is arterial or venous. Signs of injury include rapidly increasing hemoperito­neum and changes to the patient’s pulse and blood pressure. Intravascular insufation is rare but can be fatal as massive venous gas embolism can lead to rapid cardiopulmonary collapse. Early signs may present as decreased end-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2), decreased oxygen satura­tion, or a “mill wheel” murmur audible with a stethoscope. Tachyarrhythmias and right-sided heart strain with ST-T wave changes may also be seen. Later ndings include increased central venous pressure and jugular venous distension. Fortunately, a lethal dose of intravascular CO2 is much higher than air (i.e., air embolism) as CO2 is rapidly absorbed and has higher solubility in blood.