Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_753_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
48 Мб
Скачать

Pubic Inguinal Pain Syndrome (PIPS)

GiampieroCampanelli, PieroGiovanniBruni, FrancescaLombardo, andMartaCavalli
38

38.1 Introduction

The pubic inguinal pain syndrome (PIPS) is a controversial condition which presents itself as chronic groin pain. There has been no clear con­sensus, especially on its nomenclature (sports­man’s hernia, inguinal disruption, athletic pubalgia, and chronic groin pain), which has been regarded as difcult to accurately diagnose and manage.
There are many publications on the effect of treatments in athletes with long-standing groin pain but very limited information on acute groin injuries. Only 6% of the included studies were high quality [1].
We have proposed the term PIPS to give a more complete denition; it is a clinical condi­tion where there is often no real hernia, and it
G. Campanelli (*) · P. G. Bruni · F. Lombardo M. Cavalli University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
General and Day Surgery Unit, Center of Research and High Specialization for the Pathologies of Abdominal Wall and Surgical Treatment and Repair of Abdominal Hernia, Milano Hernia Center, Istituto Clinico Sant’Ambrogio, Milan, Italy e-mail: Giampiero.Campanelli@grupposandonato.it
frequently occurs in professional athletes but can affect anyone, even a non-sportsman [2].

38.2 Clinical Aspect

Patients affected by PIPS are usually males and the average age at the time of diagnosis is 20–50years [24]. The incidence is between 0.5 and 6.2% and is more common in soccer and ice hockey players where specic activities and stress involve rapid accelerations and decelera­tions with sudden directional changes [57]. Other sports such as cycling and swimming have rare occurrences of this condition as these sports do not have the increased pelvic and torso movements that are known to predispose to a painful groin [8]. Pain can become a serious debilitating condition and may place an athlete’s career at risk [9]. Moreover, PIPS can be encountered even in normally physically active people [6, 10, 11].
It is accepted that this chronic pain caused by abdominal wall weakness or injury occurs with­out a palpable hernia [6, 8]. In PIPS the pain experienced is recognized at the common point of origin of the rectus abdominis muscle and the adductor longus tendon on the pubic bone and the insertion of the inguinal ligament on the pubic bone [7].
The absence of the bulge therefore leads to the need to exclude another pathology prior to the inguinal canal. Multiple coexisting pathologies
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 G. Campanelli (ed.), The Art of Hernia Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72626-7_38
367
368
G. Campanelli et al.
are often present such as posterior inguinal canal weakness, conjoint or adductor tendinopathy, osteitis pubis, and peripheral nerve entrapment syndrome [12].
Anatomy of the groin, although a small area, is rather complex. The inguinal ligament itself arises from the anterior superior iliac spine and inserts into the pubic tubercle, and at the pubic level also arise both the rectus abdominis muscle and the adductor longus ten­don. Therefore, there are a number of forces that are either pulling or pushing at the pubic bone, and over time this can present with pain. In addiction the inguinal canal has two con­genital weaknesses with the internal and the external inguinal rings [13].
The inguinal area is mainly supplied by three nerves which all come from the lumbar plexus.
The iliohypogastric nerve (L1) pierces the transversus abdominis muscle above the iliac crest and then travels in the neurovascular plane between the transversus abdominis and the inter­nal oblique muscles. It then pierces internal oblique at a variable point along the anterior abdominal wall, eventually passing through external oblique, providing sensory innervation to the suprapubic skin.
The ilioinguinal nerve (L1) similarly pierces the transversus abdominis muscle to travel in the neurovascular plane and then passes through the internal oblique to enter the inguinal canal. It runs with the cord structures and exits the canal via the external ring to provide sensory innerva­tion to the overlying skin of the upper medial thigh, anterior scrotum, and base of the penis (or labium majus and mons pubis).
The genitofemoral nerve (L1–L2) divides into a genital and a femoral branch. The genital branch travels along the external iliac artery and then ascends to meet the vas deferens at the inter­nal ring. Entering the inguinal canal, it becomes part of the spermatic cord lying on its inferior surface with a companion vein. In the male, it passes into the scrotum via the external ring and provides motor innervation to the cremaster mus­cle and sensory innervation to a small part of the scrotum. In the female, it provides sensory inner­vation to the mons pubis.

38.3 Diagnosis

The diagnosis of chronic groin pain is difcult due to considerable etiological variability and the fact that most injuries are not identiable on physical examination or even with specialized imaging.
However, early diagnosis is very important, since morbidity will be reduced. The combina­tion of complex anatomy [5], variability of pre­sentation, and the non-specic nature of the signs and symptoms make the diagnostic process problematic.
There is no evidence-based consensus avail­able to guide decision-making, and most studies available concerning investigation and manage­ment are only level IV recommendations at best [6, 10]. Only one randomized, prospective study was conducted on 60 patients with a diagnosis of chronic groin pain and suspected sportsman’s hernia. This controlled clinical trial demonstrated that an endoscopic, preperitoneal hernioplasty was more effective than nonoperative treatment for sportsman’s hernia [14].
Proper and detailed medical history paying attention to the type and intensity of pain, the time of onset and its correlation with physical activity, its resolution, drugs, and physical thera­pies, if done, is very important [15]. The history must include questions directed at referred lum­bar abnormalities, including back pain, radicu­lopathy, and sensory disturbances. Urologic information must be gathered, including urinary symptoms and any testicular lumps or masses.
The majority of patients complain of unilat­eral inguinal pain, often radiating to the pubic tubercle and inner thigh or across the midline, and may recall the specic event that initiated the pain, but more often the onset is insidious. The symptoms are exacerbated by activity such as kicking, sprinting, and forceful, lateralizing movements and relieved with rest [6, 10, 16]. However, the pain returns when these activities are resumed.
Physical examination is the essential step in the diagnosis of groin pain, although symptoms are often vague and diffuse. Meticulous physical examination is so important, rst in upright
38 Pubic Inguinal Pain Syndrome (PIPS)
369
Fig. 38.1 The rectus test: the patient should be lying
supine with hips adduced and extended. The test is posi­tive if the patient, while lifting both, feels a keen groin pain
position and then in supine position. In upright position, the testis is evaluated and inguinal canal explored: a small bulge of the posterior wall is usually present during coughing or Valsalva maneuver, and the patient often complains of dull and burning pain at this moment, although the absence of a real inguinal hernia is crucial. In supine position, the rectus and the adductor tests are accomplished [15]. The rectus test: the patient should be lying supine with hips adduced and extended. The test is positive if the patient, while lifting both, feels a keen groin pain (Fig.38.1). The adductor test: the patient should be lying supine with hips abducted and exed and with knees exed at 90°. The test is positive if the patient, while attempting to adduct his legs against pressing in the opposite direction, feels a sharp pain in the groin [9] (Fig.38.2).
The regional examination is crucial for posi­tive and negative ndings and to help the differ­ential diagnosis. Findings include tenderness at the pubic tubercle, pain with resisted hip exion, internal rotation, and abdominal muscle contrac­tion. [6, 10, 16]
The lumbar spine, sacroiliac, and hip joints must be put through a range of motion and exam­ined for tenderness. The symphysis is examined for instability and tenderness, as osteitis pubis is a relatively common entity in the athletic popula­tion. Muscle origins, including the rectus femoris and sartorius, are palpated for sites of tenderness,
Fig. 38.2 The adductor test: the patient should be lying
supine with hips abducted and exed and with knees exed at 90°. The test is positive if the patient, while attempting to adduct his legs against pressing in the oppo­site direction, feels a sharp pain in the groin
possibly indicating muscle strain. In addition, these muscles are tested against resistance, in an attempt to provoke the symptoms. The testis and rectum should be examined for the presence of masses, and the prostate palpated for tenderness or bogginess. A gynecologic examination may be required in a female patient [6].
Currently there is no consensus on the ideal imaging method for sportsman with chronic inguinal pain.
Inguinal pain due to acute muscular, tendi­nous, or osseous injuries may be radiologically visualized. Ultrasonography (US) is a useful non­invasive and less expensive imaging modality [17]. It provides information about tendinous injuries allowing to visualize discontinuous bers within the brillary tendon tissue [11]. Dynamic ultrasound scan can be useful to assess the con­joint tendons and inguinal ligament as far as the tendon of rectus for size, integrity, echotexture, and tenderness, detect the presence of a protru­sion of the posterior wall, evaluate the symphysis pubis for irregularity and tenderness, and assess the adductor longus origin for size, integrity, echotexture, and tenderness. The common disad­vantages of this technique are that it is operator dependent and, therefore, has variable reproducibility.
Direct X-ray may reveal congenital abnormal­ities such as femoroacetabular impingement,
370
G. Campanelli et al.
developing dysplasia of the hip, as well as degen­erative conditions of hip-spine-sacroiliac joints. They may also indicate the symmetric bone resorbs in osteitis pubis, sclerosis, and symphysis widening [18].
Pelvic and lumbar MRI should be done to exclude the presence of osteitis pubis and verte­bral disease. MRI is superior to CT for musculo­tendinous imaging, and it should be used always to exclude other copathologies such as vertebral disease.
However, imaging studies are often negative, and the only clinical sign is a deep pain to palpation located near the pubic tubercle and below inguinal ligament at adductor insertion. In such cases, a clinical diagnosis of PIPS can be suspected [11].

38.4 Management

38.4.1 Conservative Treatment
The rst line of management includes rest from physical activities for 2months and inammatory and pain killing drugs for a week or until com­plete resolution of the pain. Very important is an evaluation by a physiotherapist to start exercises with the goal of stretching iliopsoas, rectus abdominis and adductor longus muscles. After 2months, if pain persists when physical activities restart, operative management may be necessary.
38.4.2 Surgical Treatment
Based on available literature, operative interven­tion is indicated for chronic groin pain refractory to conservative treatments including rest, physi­cal therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inammatory med­ications, and nerve blocks [19].
Various operative approaches for groin pain in athletes have been proposed depending on the suspected nature of injury. These operative approaches include methods of hernia repair, tenotomies of muscle tendons close to the pubic bone, transection of inguinal ligament, as well as release or transaction (neurotomy) of nearby nerves [14].
Surgery has been at the forefront of treatment for patients with PIPS. Surgical approach includes various types of open techniques with or without mesh and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphies with mesh. These tech­niques are the same as those used in the repair of inguinal hernia. Although the results reported in several studies are good, the superiority of either laparoscopic technique or open technique as per­formed by experienced hands has not been dem­onstrated to date [20].
A controlled clinical trial demonstrates clearly that an endoscopic, preperitoneal hernioplasty was more effective than nonoperative treatment for PIPS with groin pain in athletes [14]. However, it should be kept in mind that 10% of the patients in this group received preoperative open tenotomy.
Other studies underline the efcacy of TEP technique [20]; it is less traumatic than intra­abdominal or anterior technique. Postoperative pain and wound complication are less as com­pared to the open technique, and it is character­ized by low mobility and rapid return to full sports activity [21]. However, TEP might not be performed due to prostate surgery or previous lower abdominal surgery.
Many surgeons have acknowledged that lapa­roscopic therapy ensures an effective and quicker return to full sports activity (82–92% of patients in 2–8weeks) [17, 22].
Other surgeons encourage open minimal repair (OMR) for the posterior wall weakness especially when someone promotes the use of no mesh combined with an early return to sporting activity [18].
Dojcinovic proposed a Shouldice repair with resection of the genital branch of genitofemoral nerve and ilioinguinal nerve neurolysis, and, when adductor tendinosis was present, the com­plete adductor tenotomy was done [23].
Our approach is based on the etiopathogenetic theory that the situation is caused by three fac­tors: (1) the compression of the three nerves of the inguinal region, (2) the imbalance in strength of adductor and abdominal wall muscles caused by the hypertrophy and stiffness of the insertion
38 Pubic Inguinal Pain Syndrome (PIPS)
of rectus muscle and adductor longus muscle, and (3) the partial weakness of the posterior wall.
We propose a surgical procedure with the release of all three nerves of the region, the cor­rection of the imbalance in strength with the par­tial calibrated tenotomy of the rectus and adductor longus muscles, and the repair of the partial weakness of the posterior wall with a lightweight or biological mesh sutureless.
After a blood test, ECG, and chest X-ray, patients are operated on under local anesthesia. No patients received any sedation, so they are able to cooperate during surgery with cough, soft crunch, and leg adduction in order to calibrate the double partial tenotomy of the rectus abdominis and of the adductor longus. The inguinal canal is approached through a transversal inguinal small incision (3–5cm) [15]. At this step, the iliohypo­gastric nerve is usually found to be piercing the aponeurosis about 1–2cm cranially to the medial pilaster of the external ring. The medial pilaster is usually inserted on the pubic tubercle in a stiff manner so that the iliohypogastric nerve appeared stretched. After accurate inltration of the exter­nal oblique muscle aponeurosis, in order to share it from the nerves running below, the inguinal canal is opened.
The cord with the ilioinguinal nerve and the genital branch of genitofemoral nerve often appear pressed between the aponeurosis of exter­nal stiff ring and a small bulge of the posterior wall. The rectus muscle tendon generally is tense and contributed to making the iliohypogastric nerve stretch. The tendon of the adductor longus also appears tense and hypertrophic: both ten­dons are evaluated dynamically during surgery by asking the patients to cooperate with their contraction (crunch and adductor). A little indi­rect lipoma or sac is often isolated and reduced.
The procedure that we perform is the same on all the patients:
– Partial tenotomy (1 cm) of the insertion of the
rectus muscle on the pubis. At this level we
nd also an interesting intraoperative pecu-
liarity in PIPS: a thickened sheet (lamella)
behind the rectus, where normally there
should not be any fascia (Fig.38.3). This atyp-
371
Fig. 38.3 Intraoperative peculiarity in PIPS, thickened
posterior sheet to the rectus muscle
ical nding stresses us to persist in the research on PIPS to understand if this lamella is the result of a brotic process that is formed as an effect of a constant stress on the region of ten­dons insertion on the pubic bone or if this lamella is a genetic predisposition. Dissecting this lamella, the usual yellow preperitoneal fat is seen. The partial tenotomy allows to stretch the rectus muscle and release the iliohypogas­tric nerve (Fig.38.4)
– Partial section (1cm) of the insertion of the
adductor longus tendon on the pubis (Fig.38.5)
– Positioning below the cord a lightweight or
biological mesh sutureless or xed sometimes with brin glue in order to reduce the
372
G. Campanelli et al.
Fig. 38.4 Partial section of the insertion of the rectus
muscle on the pubis and of its atypical posterior band in order to stretch the muscle and release the iliohypogastric nerve
Fig. 38.5 Partial section of the insertion of the adductor
longus tendon on the pubis
compression of the cord and nerves by the
posterior wall (Figs.38.6 and 38.7)
– Closure of the external oblique muscle apo-
neurosis moving the entire cord, together with
ilioinguinal nerve and genital branch of geni-
tofemoral nerve in the subcutaneous space
(Figs.38.8 and 38.9)
Fig. 38.6 Positioning below the cord a lightweight
sutureless xed with brin glue
Fig. 38.7 Positioning below the cord biological mesh
sutureless xed with brin glue
In this way the nerves were released and the posterior wall was softly reinforced [15].
All the patients are discharged the day of oper­ation or the following day if they live more than 1h by car or 40km from the hospital.
Paracetamol or conventional nonsteroid anti­inammatory drugs are used for postoperative
Fig. 38.8 The entire cord with ilioinguinal nerve and
genital branch of genitofemoral nerve in the subcutaneous space
38 Pubic Inguinal Pain Syndrome (PIPS)
Fig. 38.9 Releasing of ilioinguinal nerve and genital
branch of genitofemoral nerve
pain relief. Patients are allowed to resume normal activities the day after surgery except physical exercise and lifting more than 10kg. They resume FKT after 15 days and sport or physical exercise 1 month after surgery.
This treatment reported excellent results with complete relief of symptoms after resumption of physical activity in more than 90% of cases [15].

References

1. Serner A, et al. Study quality on groin injury man-
agement remains low: a systematic review on treat­ment of groin pain in athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 49:813.
2. Campanelli G.Pubic inguinal pain syndrome: the so-
called sports hernia. Hernia. 2010;14:1–4.
3. Walden M, Hagglund M, Ekstrand J. The epidemi-
ology of groin injury in senior football: a system­atic review of prospective studies. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:792–7.
4. Orchard JW. Men at higher risk of groin injuries in
elite team sports: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:798–802.
5. Falvey EC, Franklyn-Miller A, PR MC.The groin tri-
angle: a patho-anatomical approach to the diagnosis of chronic groin pain in athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:213–20.
6. Swan KG, Wolcott M. The athletic hernia. Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:78–87.
373
7. Farber AJ, Wilckens JH. Sports hernia: diagnosis and therapeutic approach. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:507–14.
8. Diesen DL, Pappas TN. Sports hernias. Adv Surg. 2007;41:177–87.
9. Morales-Conde S, Socas M, Barranco A.Sportsmen hernia: what do we know? Hernia. 2010;14:5–15.
10. Moeller JL. Sportsman’s hernia. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2007;6:111–4.
11. Fon LJ, Spence RA.Sportsman’s hernia. Br J Surg. 2000;87(5):545–52.
12. Sheen AJ, etal. ‘Treatment of the Sportsman’s groin’: British Hernia Society’s 2014 position statement based on the Manchester Consensus Conference. Br J Sports Med. 2013;48(14):1079–87. https://doi.
org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092872.
13. Campanelli G, editor. Inguinal hernia sur­gery. New York: Springer; 2017. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-88-470-3947-6.
14. Paajanen H, Brinck T, Hermunen H, Airo I.Laparoscopic surgery for chronic groin pain in ath­letes is more effective than nonoperative treatment: a randomized clinical trial with magnetic resonance imaging of 60 patients with sportsman’s hernia (ath­letic pubalgia). Surgery. 2011;150:99–107.
15. Cavalli M, Bombini G, Campanelli G.Pubic ingui­nal pain syndrome: the so-called sports hernia. Surg Technol Int. 2014;24:189–94.
16. Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Fon GT. Incidence of pubic bone marrow oedema in Australian rules foot­ball players: relation to groin pain. Br J Sports Med. 2001;35:28–33.
17. Susmallian S, etal. Laparoscopic repair of ‘sports­man’s hernia’ in soccer players as treatment of chronic inguinal pain. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10:CR52–4.
18. Minnich JM, Hanks JB, Muschaweck U, Brunt LM, Diduch DR. Sports hernia: diagnosis and treatment highlighting a minimal repair surgical technique. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1341–9.
19. Nam A, Brody F.Management and therapy for sports hernia. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:154–64.
20. Paksoy M, Sekmen Ü. Sportsman hernia: the review of current diagnosis and treatment modalities. Turkish J Surg. 2016;32:122–9.
21. Paajanen H, Syvahuoko I, Airo I. Totally extra­peritoneal endoscopic (TEP) treatment of sports­man’s hernia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14:215–8.
22. Srinivasan A, Schuricht A. Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair in profes­sional athletes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002;12:101–6.
23. Dojčinović B, et al. Surgical treatment of chronic groin pain in athletes. Int Orthop. 2012;36:2361–5.
Surgical Emergencies inInguinal Hernia
S.Rocchetti, R.Ariotti, G.Burtulo, andM.Carlucci
39
Emergency surgery for inguinal hernias is associ­ated with a high risk of postoperative complica­tions as well as increased perioperative mortality rates.
Complicated hernias may have different pre­senting symptoms such as local or abdominal pain, hernia irreducibility, vomiting, and intesti­nal obstruction. Different studies showed older patients in the emergency patient groups, usually with higher ASA scores and, sometimes, previ­ous nonsurgical indication due to clinical story or comorbidity.
The most common emergency hernias are inguinal, but emergency femoral hernias need a small bowel resection in a higher percentage of cases.
Although therapeutic management of inguinal hernia allows elective treatment in the vast major­ity of cases, complications frequently constitute real surgical emergencies; these are represented by incarceration, intestinal obstruction, and strangulation.
39.1 Denition andClinical Presentation
39.1.1 Incarcerated Hernia
It is a condition that occurs when the herniary content is no longer reducible into its original cav­ity (abdomen). It is generally caused by adher­ence between the hernia content (the sac) and the ring. Usually this condition can occur more fre­quently when the constricting ring is weak in elas­ticity and small in size compared to the hernia content, in fact we can observe a higher incidence of incarcerated hernia in femoral hernia than inguinal ones. An incarcerated hernia generally appears as a non-reducible swelling; however, clinical presentation may not always be obvious especially in cases where the hernia is small and/ or the somatic constitution of the patient does not allow physical examination. Especially when it occurs acutely (e.g., following a physical effort), the patient can experience intense local pain, and it can be difcult to clinically distinguish incar­ceration from strangulation. Therefore, the onset of an acute non-reducibility must be treated as an emergency.
39.1.2 Intestinal Occlusion
S. Rocchetti · R. Ariotti · G. Burtulo M. Carlucci (*) General and Emergency Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Institute, Milan, Italy e-mail: carlucci.michele@hsr.it
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 G. Campanelli (ed.), The Art of Hernia Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72626-7_39
Inguinal hernia is the second cause of small bowel occlusion (in the United States). It is usually due to accumulation and difcult transit of intestinal
375
376
S. Rocchetti et al.
material inside the hernia bag. This can occur because of compression caused by the collar or for an abnormal rotation of the intestinal limbs inside the sac. This condition can often be solved by reducing the hernia content, but it is frequently associated with real incarceration and subsequent irreducibility. This results in mechanical occlu­sion: symptoms may include constipation, local pain, cramping abdominal pain, abdominal swell­ing, and vomiting; the abdomen may become hyper-tympanic, and the bowel sounds may be initially hyperactive and high- pitched and lately reduced or absent due to onset of ileus.
39.1.3 Strangulation
It is denitely the most dangerous complication; it occurs when the blood supply to part of the bowel is blocked.
Although it is often the result of an acute event (such as a physical effort), it can also occur in the absence of an apparent cause.
Strangulation is characterized by irreducibil­ity and acute pain, usually of considerable inten­sity (both to palpation and spontaneous); almost always it leads to intestinal occlusion.
It must be quickly treated, since in a few hours it evolves to gangrene of the ischemic bowel, fol­lowed by perforation, peritonitis, and septic shock.
39.2.1 Physical Examination
Physical examination must always be accurately performed both in the supine and in the ortho­static positions, evaluating both the inguinal and the femoral regions with and without Valsalva maneuver. The inguinal canal should be exam­ined by inserting the tip of the nger inside the inguinal outer ring. Any inguinal swelling should be evaluated for size, reducibility, consistency, and pain. The whole abdomen should be evalu­ated in an attempt to look for any sign of obstruction.
39.2.2 Ultrasound
Ultrasound, performed with dynamic poses, is the rst-choice instrumental investigation. It is cheap, always available, and fast and does not expose the patient to biologically potentially dan­gerous radiations. However, the sensitivity and specicity of this method are operator dependent. US may be useful in identifying undiagnosed hernias and can provide information about the size of the collar and the content of the hernia bag (small or large bowel tract, liquid effusion, fat, etc.).
39.2.3 Abdominal Radiographs

39.2 Diagnosis

Clinical history and physical examination are of crucial importance in the diagnosis of inguinal her­nias and their complications with particular atten­tion paid to the duration and severity of symptoms. Although complications are rarely the symptom of the onset of hernias, in most cases, they occur in patients with a previous history of inguinal hernia or with a history of a previous surgery for hernia.
When clinical examination does not allow a certain diagnosis, several instrumental investiga­tions can be helpful, such as ultrasound, X-ray, computed tomography, and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
Incarcerated and strangulated groin hernias fre­quently occur with abdominal pain that can be precisely localized or arise with peritonitis and acute abdomen. Abdominal X-ray (both with cli­nostatic and orthostatic acquisition) is a simple and fast method necessary to exclude differential causes and investigate the possible occurrence of abdominal obstruction.
39.2.4 Computed Tomography
Although computed tomography represents a second-level instrumental investigation for ingui­nal hernia, according to some authors, this is the method of choice for investigating the sudden
39 Surgical Emergencies inInguinal Hernia
Fig. 39.1 CT scan showing an incarcerated femoral her-
nia containing bowel that shows reduced enhancement of the wall as for ischemia
change, or worsening, of the symptoms. Computed tomography has a high positive and negative predictive value (respectively, 94 and 96%) and high specicity and sensitivity (83%), especially when performed with dynamic poses and with oral administration of contrast medium. It may help to understand presence/absence of bowel ischemic suffering and to choose the sub­sequent adequate operative treatment (Fig.39.1).
39.2.5 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Imaging
For its ability to discriminate soft tissues, mag­netic resonance imaging offers the highest sensi­tivity and specicity, even higher than computed tomography. However, this method is expansive and too time-consuming to be actually used under emergency conditions.
39.2.6 Laparoscopy
Incarcerated and strangulated hernias are tradi­tionally repaired through open surgery.
Laparoscopy is time-consuming and requires an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. However, recent studies have shown its importance as diag­nostic tool allowing an exhaustive inspection of the intestinal loops ruling out ischemic damage.
Laparoscopy approaches (transabdominal or total extraperitoneal) are discussed in the follow­ing chapter.
377
39.2.7 Deep Inguinal Ring Laparoscopy
Following inguinotomy, the trocar is inserted through the deep inguinal ring. This allows an evaluation of possible ischemia damage in the intestinal loops.
Hernias may spontaneously be reduced, for example, after administration of muscle-relaxing anesthetic drugs. In this case, ischemic damage should be nevertheless ruled out before perform­ing the hernia repair, especially if the hernia was incarcerated or strangulated. In this case, laparos­copy is both feasible and safe, and it is also a quite accurate diagnostic tool. Compared to lapa­rotomy, complications are less frequent, and postoperative recovery is both faster and less painful for the patient.

39.3 Surgical Options

The European Hernia Society (EHS) guidelines state that the gold standard for elective inguinal hernia repair in adults is the Lichtenstein tech­nique. However, the optimal technique to cure incarcerated and/or strangulated inguinal hernia remains controversial. Morbidity and mortality are signicantly increased in patients presenting with a complicated hernia, and likewise, the dura­bility of these repairs is signicantly lower than elective repairs. As expected, emergent groin her­nia repairs have increased morbidity and mortal­ity compared to elective repairs. The pathology that contributes to this increased morbidity and mortality is often the presence of necrotic or isch­emic bowel causing intra- abdominal sepsis. The crux of the clinical decision is operating early on incarcerated hernias prior to the transition to strangulation. This decreases the likelihood of bowel ischemia, perforation, and need for resec­tion. Strangulated hernias have a much greater likelihood of mortality and morbidity and signi­cantly limit the choices for repair.
Patients undergoing emergent inguinal hernia repair in the absence of bowel resection, isch­emia, or peritonitis have no increased risk of mesh-related morbidity.