Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5776_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
53 Мб
Скачать
AB
Fig. B25.1 MR FLAIR images, axial plane. (A) Multiple right hemi- spheric signal abnormalities, consistent with a large basal ganglia ischemia and anterior and external border zone infarction (arrow). (B) Internal border zone infarction at the cella media level (arrow) in addition to partial inhomogeneous territorial MCA infarction. (Co­urtesy of Dr. Schröter, Radiologische Praxis am Krankenhaus Rüd­ersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.)
389Clinical Course (1)
Fig. B25.2 DSA, right ICA injection, posteroanterior view. High-
grade right M1-MCA stenosis (arrows). Note the concomitant fi lling of the fetal-type PCA (single arrow). (Courtesy of Dr. Schröter, Radi­ologische Praxis am Krankenhaus Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.)
AB
Fig. B25.3 MR FLAIR image, axial plane. (A) Shrunken ischemic l e s i o n s i n t h e r i g h t h e m i s p h e r e . E n l a r g e d r i g h t f r o n t a l h o r n , s e c o n d ­ary to the adjacent ischemic defect. (B) Mildly enlarged ventricles. Note the residual external anterior border zone infarction (arrow).
left MCA. There were no signs of vasculitis or fi bromuscular dysplasia (Fig. B25.12, Fig. B25.13, Fig. B25.14).
Clinical Course (1)
The new transient ischemic event was thought to be of hemodynamic origin. The pathogenesis of the progres­sive right M1-MCA stenosis was unclear. A cardiac or artery-to-artery embolism was unlikely. Thrombophilia, vasculitis, and autoimmune disease had been ruled out. The young age of the patient, the rapid progression of the stenosis, and the normal vessel wall fi ndings in the
ICA-L
Fig. B25.4 Extracranial duplex, longitudinal plane. Normal fl ow s i g n a l i n t h e l e f t I C A ( fl ow velocity 45/21 cm/s). Note a normal pul- satility index (PI) of 0.84.
e x t r a c r a n i a l c a r o t i d a r t e r i e s a r g u e d a g a i n s t a t h e r o s c l e ­rotic stenosis despite the presence of multiple vascular risk factors. Moyamoya disease was discussed but seemed unlikely because of the rapid progression of vessel disease and the spared terminal ICA on both sides.
Xenon CT following acetazolamide infusion revealed
diminished cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) on the e ff ected side. Because of the rapid progression and the recurrent symptoms as well as the limited hemo­dynamic reserve, an extracranial–intracranial superior temporal artery (STeA)–MCA bypass was performed and long-term stroke prevention with clopidogrel was continued.
390 Case 25 Progressive Right M1 Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Treated with Extracranial–Intracranial Bypass Surgery
ICA-R
Fig. B25.5 Extracranial duplex, longitudinal plane. Normal fl ow signal in the right ICA (fl ow velocity 49/34 cm/s). Note a normal PI of 0.76.
M1-MCA-R
M1-MCA-L
Fig. B25.6 TCCS (tr anst emporal appro ach) , left -sided insonati on, midbrain plane. Mildly increased and turbulent fl ow in the left M1-MCA (fl ow velocity 181/83 cm/s).
A1-ACA-L
Fig. B25.7 TCCS (t rans tempo ral approach) , right -sid ed in sona tion, midbrain plane. Severely reduced fl ow without turbulence in the right M1-MCA over all his length (arrows) (fl ow velocity 17/10).
A1-ACA-R
Fig. B25.9 TCCS (t rans tempo ral approach) , right -sid ed in sona tion, midbrain plane. Strong fl ow signal in the right A1-ACA, indicating leptomeningeal collateralization (fl ow velocity: 156/84).
Fig. B25.8 TCCS (tr anst emporal appro ach) , left -sided insonati on, midbrain plane. Normal fl ow in the left A1-ACA (fl ow velocity 110/68 cm/s).
P2-PCA-L
Fig. B25.10 TCCS (trans temp oral ap proa ch), left-s ided ins onati on, midbrain plane. Normal fl ow signal in the left proximal P2-PCA (fl ow velocity 61/25 cm/s).
P2-PCA-R
Fig. B25.11 TCCS (transtemporal approach), right-sided inson­ation, midbrain plane. Increased fl ow in the right proximal P2- PCA, indicating leptomeningeal collateralization (fl ow velocity 105/57 cm/s).
391Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (10 Months)
Fig. B25.12 DSA, right ICA injection, posteroanterior view. Near-
oclusion of the right M1-MCA corresponding to the site of stenosis seen 1 year before in Fig. B25.2 (arrow). Note the residual fl ow signal in the distal M1-MCA and M2-MCA (arrows). Note also the leptome­ningeal collaterals from the ACA and PCA (arrowheads).
Fig. B25.13 DSA, right ICA injection, lateral view. Markedly reduced contrast fi lling of the right MCA (arrows). There was no circum- scribed vessel narrowing seen. Note the fetal-type PCA (arrowhead).
Clinical Course (2) and Follow-up Neuroradiologic Findings
DSA immediately after surgery showed patent collateral vessels (not shown). Cerebral CT revealed no intracranial bleeding and no new ischemic brain lesion (not shown). Three months later the patient presented with a new TIA aff ecting the contralateral side with sensory disturbances in the right arm and additional headaches. Cerebral MRI showed no evidence of new ischemic lesions but revealed a chronic right frontal subdural hematoma. MR angiog­raphy (MRA) was indicative of an occlusion of the right M1-MCA segment and a mild stenosis of the left M1-MCA segment (Fig. B25.15). Clopidogrel was stopped and the hematoma successfully treated by a burr-hole cranioto­my. A follow-up CT after surgery was unremarkable.
Fig. B25.14 DSA, left ICA injection, posteroanterior view. In con­trast with the TCCS fi ndings there is no visible vessel narrowing of the left M1-MCA.
Follow-up Neurosonologic Findings (10 Months)
Extracranial Duplex Sonography
Again, all extracranial signals were normal (not shown).
Transcranial Duplex Sonography
The systolic fl ow velocity of the left M1-MCA segment remained slightly increased (176 cm/s). Again, mildly raised fl ow velocities were observed in the right-sid- ed A1-ACA segment and the main stem of the PCA, suggestive of leptomeningeal collateral function. No ow was detected within the right M1-MCA segment in spite of the optimal insonation conditions (low PRF,
392 Case 25 Progressive Right M1 Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Treated with Extracranial–Intracranial Bypass Surgery
DMCV-R
Fig. B25.15 Small image: MR T2-weighted image, axial plane. Chronic right frontal subdural hematoma. Large image: 3D TOF- MRA, coronal maximal intensity projection (MIP). Missing right MCA signal, suggesting occlusion. Circumscribed signal intensity reduc­tion in the left proximal M1-MCA indicative of stenosis (arrowhead). Also note the bilateral A1-ACA segment narrowing—a clear diff eren- tiation between artifact and real stenosis is not possible.
high color gain) through the right-sided trepanation de­fect. A venous signal was present in the lateral fi ssure only, corresponding with the deep middle cerebral vein (Fig. B25.16). A normal fl ow signal was seen in the main stem of the right STeA. The STeA–MCA bypass could not be visualized (not shown).
Conclusion
Further progression of the right-sided MCA pathology now considered as main-stem occlusion with leptome­ningeal collateral blood fl ow from the ACA and PCA. Unchanged mild stenosis of the left proximal M1-MCA segment. Occlusion of the right STeA–MCA bypass.
Clinical Course (3)
A follow-up DSA was performed, which confi rmed the occlusion of the STeA–MCA bypass as well as the complete occlusion of the right M1-MCA segment (not shown). As the patient had now remained stable, no second bypass operation was planned. Because of the contralateral transient brain ischemia, progression of right-sided MCA pathology, and the failure of stroke prevention with clopidogrel, oral anticoagulation with phenprocoumon was started. During the clinical and MRI follow-up over 2 years, no new ischemic event was reported.
Fig. B25.17 shows a schematic of the patient’s extra-
and intracranial brain-supplying arteries.
Final Diagnosis
Recurrent cerebral ischemia in both MCA territories caused by a progressive right MCA stenosis with second­ary occlusion and stable mild stenosis of the left M1-MCA
Fig. B25.16 TCCS (transtemporal approach), right-sided insona­tion, midbrain plane. Insonation of the right deep middle cerebral vein which parallels the course of the M1-MCA. Note the absent ow signal of the right M1-MCA.
RL
Fig. B25.17 Schematic of the patient’s extra- and intracranial brain-supplying arteries. Right M1-MCA occlusion and left M1-MCA stenosis (circles). Collateralization of the right MCA territory via leptomeningeal collaterals from the right ACA and right PCA (red arrows). Note the right fetal-type PCA.
segment of unknown origin. Secondary occlusion of the right-sided STeA–MCA bypass.
Discussion
Clinical Aspects
This patient was a 31-year-old woman who had recur­rent cerebral ischemia because of bilateral MCA ste­nosis. The right side demonstrated rapid progression and subsequent occlusion. The etiology of the steno­sis remained unclear, although the patient had a posi­tive vascular risk profi le. However, her young age, the dynamic progression, and the absence of extracranial
393Discussion
atherosclerosis argued against an intracranial athero­sclerotic origin. Other vasculopathies were considered but diagnostic tests for these were negative (for further reading on nonatherothrombotic stroke in young people, see also Case 5, Case 6, Case 14, and Case 31). Moyamoya disease was considered but seemed unlikely because of the ICA-sparing pattern and of the fast progression of the disease (for further discussion on moyamoya disease, see also Case 9).
The rapid progression of vessel narrowing, recurrent is­chemia despite medical treatment, and the impaired CVR diagnosed by acetazolamide xenon CT led to the decision to perform an EC–IC bypass operation. An impaired CVR increase is known to increase the risk of ipsilateral annual stroke recurrence up to 30% (Garett et al 2009). Also, it has been shown that an EC–IC bypass improves or even nor­malizes an altered CVR (Anderson et al 1992, Baron et al 1981, Gibbs et al 1987, Hirai et al 2005, Schmiedek et al
1994). Bypass surgery may also ameliorate a previously diminished CBF. Postsurgical baseline CBF increased signif­icantly, from 595 ± 89 mL/min by 78 ± 43 mL/min, meas­ured with phase-contrast MRI (Neff et al 2004).
EC–IC bypass surgery was introduced in 1967 but has been controversial since the EC–IC Bypass Study was published in 1985. This study demonstrated that EC–IC bypass in patients with symptomatic high-grade ICA, high-grade MCA stenosis, or occlusion did not yield bet­ter results than the best medical treatment (EC/IC Bypass Study Group 1985). A total of 1,377 patients were in­cluded in this trial, of whom 714 were treated medically and 663 surgically. The technical results of the surgical interventions were good, as 96% of all bypasses remained patent. The dominant vascular pathology in the surgical group was extracranial ICA occlusion in 58.1%, of whom 64% were asymptomatic since the fi rst event. The remain- ing patients presented with recurrent cerebrovascular events. A distal extracranial ICA stenosis was present in
15.4% and 14.4% had MCA stenosis and 12.1% MCA occlu­sion. The observed 30-day surgical mortality and major stroke morbidity rate was 0.6% and 2.5%, respectively. Fatal and nonfatal strokes occurred signifi cantly more often and earlier in the surgery group. When periopera­tive strokes were included, surgery led to a 14% increase in relative risk of fatal and nonfatal stroke. In particular, patients with recurrent ischemic events and MCA steno­sis revealed less favorable clinical outcomes. Functional outcome comparison between both groups after a mean observation period of 3.5 and 3.8 years was similar, how­ever: 31% in the surgical arm and 29% in the medical arm. Subsequently, EC–IC bypass surgery was largely aban­doned and only a few specialized centers still have the expertise to perform this type of operation.
A comprehensive review in 2010 confi rmed the results of the EC–IC Bypass Surgery trial (Fluri et al 2010). An analysis of data from 21 studies including a total of 2,591 patients indicated that the operation did not yield benefi ts in terms of the outcome parameters (stroke, death, and functional independence). The Japanese EC–IC Trial (JET) recruited patients with impaired cerebral hemodynam­ics assessed by acetazolamide single photon emission CT (SPECT) assessment and randomized patients into a sur­gical and a medical/conservative group. However, the trial
failed to demonstrate a benefi t in surgically treated pa- tients in terms of the primary outcomes of death from all causes and any stroke (Ogasawara and Ogawa 2006).
The American Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS) did not show superiority of EC–IC treatment in patients with ICA occlusion. Patients were included if hemod­ynamic impairment was present, measured by a PET­derived increased oxygen extraction fraction (OEF). The increased OEF allows metabolism to be maintained if CBF is decreased, before cerebral ischemia develops. All patients in the COSS study had a symptomatic carotid occlusion with ischemic stroke or TIA within the last 120 days pri­or to inclusion. Patient characteristics, antithrombotic therapy, and risk factors were similar in both treatment arms. Following an interim analysis of 195 patients, the trial had to be stopped for futility. Although interventions were performed successfully and OEF values improved after surgery, the clinical outcome did not diff er between both groups. The combined risk of perioperative stroke, death, and following ipsilateral stroke after 2 years was 21% in the bypass group and 22.7% in the medically treat­ed group. The 30-day risk of ipsilateral stroke was 14.4% and 2%, respectively (Powers et al 2011).
The following points have to be considered as expla­nations for the above negative fi ndings. In the medically treated group, the primary endpoint risk was 22.7% for 2 years rather than the calculated 40% that had been as­sumed on the basis of the available data (Derdeyn et al 2000, Grubb et al 1998). A similar phenomenon was observed in the SAMMPRIS trial, where conventional­ly treated patients performed considerably better than expected. Better medical control of vascular risk factors and the use of statins, which are postulated to improve CVR and to improve collateral function, have been con­sidered as the underlying explanation (Forteza et al 2012, Ovbiagele et al 2007). Corresponding to this hypothesis, patients in the COSS study showed very good treatment compliance concerning the antithrombotic therapy (94%), 68% had good LDL cholesterol control, and 46% had fol­low-up blood pressure levels <130 mm Hg. Another factor possibly contributing to the negative COSS result could be patient selection, which was based on PET-determined OEF alterations in the aff ected hemisphere. Criticisms are that this parameter does not reliably identify a hemo­dynamic compromise and that the technique does not consider the regional aspects of hypoperfusion (Bang et al 2008a, Carlson et al 2011). Also, it remains unclear whether the OEF was really a suitable inclusion criterion, as it has rarely been used for CVR assessment and never formally compared with well-established methods such as ultrasound-derived vasomotor reactivity testing.
Known postoperative complications of EC–IC bypass surgery other than ischemia are subdural hygroma and hematoma, epidural hematoma, seizures, and meningitis. Other unwanted events may occur which do not neces­sarily increase the morbidity: for example, a secondary bypass occlusion, occurring in ~5–10% of cases, or a sec­ondary MCA occlusion in cases where high-grade MCA stenosis was the indication for the bypass operation. Our patient had both complications. Although the under­lying reason is unclear, the bypass occlusion may have been facilitated by the cessation of antiplatelet therapy
394 Case 25 Progressive Right M1 Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Treated with Extracranial–Intracranial Bypass Surgery
at the time of surgery for the subdural hematoma. Two explanations are possible for the MCA occlusion during follow-up. The occlusion might have been caused by a bypass-induced reduced perfusion pressure at the site of the stenosis. This mechanism had already been consid­ered to be one of the reasons for the poor outcome in the MCA stenosis patients in the EC–IC bypass study. Alter­natively, in our case the MCA occlusion might also have been the natural course of the primary vascular disease.
In summary, considering the complication rates of the operation on one hand and the low complication and event rates in the medically treated patients on the other hand, a routine recommendation for EC–IC bypass surgery cannot be given on the basis of the currently available data. For further reading on EC–IC bypass surgery, see also Case 9 and Case 28).
Angiologic and Anatomic Aspects
The initial ultrasound fi nding in the right-sided M1-MCA segment was interpreted as a near-occlusion. This was based on the coexistence of a long-segmented M1-MCA color-mode signal and the low fl ow pattern with a fl ow velocity of 17/10 cm/s. In contrast with the well-defi ned near-occlusions in the extracranial ICA, there are no clear recommendations regarding the intracranial circulation. Similar to the fl ow dynamics in extracranial ICA, it can be assumed that fl ow velocity increases up to a diameter reduction of ~80% only. A further increase will then lead to a breakdown of perfusion pressure, subsequent reduc­tion of fl ow and fl ow velocity, and fi nally vessel occlusion. R e d u c e d fl ow velocities may, according to the physics of ow, also be found in less severe long- segmented stenoses. This might be an alternative explanation of the transcra­nial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) fi nding in our patient (for further discussion on near- occlusion of the MCA see also Case 30; for further discussion on near­occlusion of the extracranial ICA see also Case 15).
The evaluation of the contralateral, clinically symp­tomatic, left-sided M1-MCA segment by diff erent techniques yielded ambiguous results. Ultrasound anal­ysis demonstrated a mild turbulence and a mildly raised non-angle-corrected fl ow velocity of 183/83 cm/s, in- terpreted as a low-grade stenosis which could not be confi rmed by DSA. On follow-up TCCS again, M1-MCA stenosis was diagnosed and was then further supported by time-of-fl ight (TOF)-MRA fi ndings. M1-MCA systol- ic fl ow velocities between 155 cm/s and 220 cm/s have been reported to correlate well with stenoses <50% diag­nosed by DSA, with sensitivity, specifi city, and positive and negative predictive values of 94%, 100%, 95%, and 100%, respectively (Baumgartner et al 1999). The mean value of M1-MCA stenosis in this study measured by DSA was 36.8%. The question therefore arises whether DSA is sensitive enough to detect low-grade intracranial sten­oses in all instances. As a mild stenosis might be eccen­tric in location, it might not be appropriately visualized in standard posteroanterior and lateral projections. In addi­tion, superior sensitivity for CTA in posterior circulation steno-occlusive disease as compared with DSA has been reported when low fl ow was present (Bash et al 2005). Ultrasound and TOF-MRA are both fl ow-sensitive meth-
ods. Ultrasound fl ow velocities are directly related to the square of the vessel diameter and are therefore particu­larly sensitive for low-grade stenoses. TOF-MRA regularly overrates the grade of stenosis and therefore often cannot be used for stenosis graduation; however, it is helpful as a screening method. Its major limitation is the inabili­ty to confi dently distinguish a real low-grade stenosis from the frequently observed artifacts suggesting vessel narrowing. Yet, when using 3-T scanning, 3D TOF-MRA performed comparably to CTA for extracranial vessel a s s e s s m e n t o f E C – I C b y p a s s e s i n m o y a m o y a p a t i e n t s , a n d was even superior for the intracranial vessel segment (Q. Chen et al 2014). Comparing TCD, TOF-MRA, and DSA the highest correlation was seen in TCD and MRA when analyzing MCA stenoses (Röther et al 1994). Six stenoses diagnosed by TCD and MRA were not demonstrated by DSA in this study. It therefore seems that there is a risk of overlooking low-grade MCA stenoses with routine DSA, especially in standard biplanar imaging.
During follow-up, our patient developed a total
M1-MCA occlusion, demonstrated by the absent arterial signal. Diff erentiating near-occlusion might be diffi cult, but in our case occlusion was beyond doubt. The skull bone defects resulting from the bypass operation yielded optimal transtemporal insonation conditions, permitting an excellent view of the lateral fi ssure where the main stem of the MCA is located. Instead of the MCA, only a low fl ow signal away from the probe and attributable to the deep middle cerebral vein was detected. Visualization of accompanying veins in cases of absent arterial fl ow sig- nals may also be used in other locations as a diagnostic aid to confi rm occlusion: for example, the vertebral vein may be visible in extracranial vertebral artery (VA) occlu­sion and the basal vein of Rosenthal in cases of intracra­nial PCA occlusion (see also Chapter 5, “PCA Occlusion” under “Intracranial Pathology,” and Case 39).
Main-stem MCA occlusions may lead to fl ow reduction in the extracranial ICA in the form of a reduced fl ow ve- locity and mildly increased pulsatility. This was not the case in our patient because of the presence of an ipsilat­eral fetal-type PCA. In this constellation the ICA supplies the ACA and PCA, both also working as collateral vessels supplying the MCA territory, which explains why the ow signal of the extracranial ICA was not altered. As a fetal-type PCA is present in ~10–15% of subjects, such a constellation can be regarded as an exception. In most cases, reduced fl ow velocity and mildly increased pulsa- tility in the extracranial ICA is highly indicative of a distal obstruction of the proximal MCA or distal ICA (see also Fig. A5.98). In our patient, TCCS could not visualize the posterior communicating artery (PCoA) directly. Because of the normal
, a prominent P
er
ow pattern of the extracranial ICA, howev-
CoA was assumed to be present, which was later confi rmed by DSA. In case of doubt, the tap test can be used to verify a fetal-type PCA (for further details about the tap test, see also Chapter 2, “Posterior Com­municating Artery” under “Special Arterial Anatomy and Ultrasound Anatomy”).
Finally, ultrasound bypass evaluation should be discussed. We recommend fi rst gently palpating the proximal STeA and following the vessel course toward the trepanation defect. Using TCCS, the main stem of
395Discussion
the STeA and the bypass can then be insonated dire­ctly. In patients with extracranial ICA occlusion and a well-functioning bypass, the M2-MCA branches and even the M1-MCA segment itself may show a retrograde ow. On brief STeA compression, fl ow decreases or even ceases completely. A less patent bypass may lead only to partial, peripheral retrograde MCA blood fl ow while the M1-MCA segment continues to have compromised antegrade fl ow (Umemura et al 2002). A well-operating bypass can also be recognized by a raised fl ow velocity and reduced pulsatility within the STeA (Arakawa et al 2003, Inoue and Fujimoto 2005).
Most relevant, however, is the resulting blood v o l u m e fl ow as a direct marker of CBF. The question of how much blood can be contributed via the bypass is, for example, defi ned by the size of the donor and r e c i p i e n t v e s s e l s a s w e l l a s b y t h e d e g r e e o f t h e a c t u a l h e m o d y n a m i c i m p a i r m e n t . K e e p i n g t h i s i n m i n d , d o n o r and recipient vess els should have a diameter of at least
1 mm. A phase-contrast MRI study reported volume ow levels of 84 ± 32 mL/min (range 14–177 mL/min) within the bypasses analyzed (Neff et al 2004). Assuming a mean volume fl ow of 150–200 mL/min carried by the MCA in healthy individuals, a bypass may therefore be able to provide the necessary volume fl ow of the total MCA territory. This goal is probably rarely achieved. How­ever, providing even 50% of the MCA territory blood fl ow r e q u i r e m e n t s m i g h t b e s u ffi cient for clinical stabilization if additional leptomeningeal collateral fl ow is present. Ultrasound measurements of the STeA blood volume fl ow in bypass patients have not yet been reported.
The CTA technique does not permit direct volume ow measurements but may clearly visualize the i n t e g r i t y a n d c a l i b e r ( s e e a l s o Fig. 9.19), as well as p o t e n t i a l s t e n o s e s o f t h e b y p a s s ( T e k s a m e t a l 2 0 0 4 ) . I n addition, CT perfusion may be performed to assess the p a r e n c h y m a l p e r f u s i o n s t a t u s a s t h e p r i m a r y t h e r a p e u ­tic target of bypass surgery.
396
Case 26
Extracranial Left Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm Following Basilar Artery Stenting
Clinical Presentation
A 58-year-old man was admitted to a district general hospital with right-sided sensorimotor hemisyndrome and dysarthria. Several weeks earlier he had complained of transient vertigo and a gait disorder. The patient had known vascular risk factors of arterial hypertension, hy­percholesterolemia, and diabetes mellitus. On admission he presented fl uctuating symptoms with a moderate pro- portional hemiparesis, hemihypesthesia on the right side, and dysarthria (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score: 7).
Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
The initial cerebral CT scan showed hypodensities in both cerebellar hemispheres and a small hypodense area in the right pons consistent with subacute infarction (Fig. B26.1). Diff usion-weighted MRI revealed acute left paramedian pontine ischemia (Fig. B26.2) MR angiogra­phy (MRA) was not performed.
Suspected Diagnosis
Recurrent ischemia in the vertebrobasilar artery terri­tory suspicious of basilar artery (BA) pathology (plaque, stenosis, or thrombosis).
Conventional Angiography
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) demonstrated a high-grade stenosis in the middle segment of the BA. The vertebral and carotid arteries were normal (Fig. B26.3).
new ischemic lesions (Fig. B26.4). Secondary stroke pre­vention was commenced with aspirin and clopidogrel and the patient was referred to a rehabilitation center. By this stage there had still not been any neurosonologic exam­ination.
Two we ek s a ft er th e s ten ti ng , t he pat ie nt ha d a t r a n s i e n t i s c h e m i c a t t a c k ( T I A ) w i t h d o u b l e v i s i o n and a left-sided hemiparesis that lasted a few hours. F u r t h e r m o r e , t h e r e s i d u a l r i g h t - s i d e d h e m i p a r e s i s a n d the dysarthria mildly worsened. The patient was then admitted to our department for the fi rst time.
Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
• Was there restenosis or occlusion of the stented BA?
• Was there evidence of an embolic source in the verte-
brobasilar system?
Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
Extracranial Duplex Sonography
B-mode imaging of the carotid arteries showed moder­ate atherosclerotic vascular changes, more pronounced in the carotid bifurcation. Doppler spectrum analysis demonstrated normal fi ndings. The left VA showed a marked increase in caliber in the V2-VA segment at the vertebral level between C5 and C6 with a maximal diam­eter of 10.5 mm in B-mode and color-mode imaging. The diameter of the V1-VA segment was 5.5 mm. A constant diameter ranging from 4.3 mm to 4.5 mm was seen in all segments of the right VA. The Doppler spectrum analy­sis demonstrated normal fl ow signals in the left middle and distal V2-VA segment as well as in the right V2-VA segment (Figs. B26.5–B26.10, see also Video
B26.1).
Clinical Course (1)
In view of the remitting clinical symptoms, and the le­sions on MRI, interventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the BA followed by stent implantation was performed via the left vertebral artery (VA). This was technically and clinically successful and a follow-up CT scan showed a patent BA without evidence of bleeding or
Transcranial Duplex Sonography
Transtemporal insonation yielded normal fi ndings in the anterior (ACA), middle (MCA), and posterior (PCA) c e r e b r a l a r t e r i e s o n b o t h s i d e s . T r a n s f o r a m i n a l i n s o n a t i o n demonstrated normal fl ow signals in the BA and the intracranial segment of both VA (not shown).
Conclusion
Suspected left VA dissection with formation of a dis­secting aneurysm in the proximal V2-VA segment at the C5/C6 level. There were no signs of detectable restenosis in the stented BA.
Cranial CT and CT Angiography (Day 1)
Cranial CT confi rmed the known cerebellar and pontine in- farctions. In addition, a new paramedian pontine infarct of moderate size was seen on the right side adjoining the BA stent (Fig. B26.11). CT angiography (CTA) confi rmed the wid- ening of the left V2-VA segment between C5 and C6 which was diagnosed as a VA dissecting aneurysm (Fig. B26.12).
Clinical Course (2)
The VA dissection was thought to be of iatrogenic origin, generated during the initial DSA with BA stent implantation. The recent pontine infarction was attributed to a stent-re­lated secondary occlusion of a perforating artery. An embol­ic event, potentially originating from the aneurysm, could not be excluded but seemed unlikely because of the infarct location. Nonetheless, oral anticoagulation with phenpro­coumon was started and the patient was again referred to a rehabilitation center. He was then lost to follow-up.
397Final Diagnosis
Fig. B26.1 Unenhanced cranial CT, axial plane. Hypodensities in
the right cerebellar hemisphere and a small right-sided hypodense area within the pons suggestive of non-acute stroke (arrows). Note the enlarged BA (arrowhead).
Final Diagnosis
Primary left-sided pontine infarction and old right-sided pontine and cerebellar infarctions caused by BA stenosis of assumed atherosclerotic origin. Secondary right-sided pontine infarction after successful BA stenting, probably induced by secondary occlusion of a pontine perforator artery within the stented region or by artery-to-artery embolism from left V2-VA dissecting aneurysm.
Fig. B26.2 MRI, apparent diff usion coeffi cient (ADC) map, axial plane. Acute left-sided paramedian pontine ischemia (arrow).
398 Case 26 Extracranial Left Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm Following Basilar Artery Stenting
Fig. B26.3 DSA, left VA injection, posteroanterior view. High-grade stenosis in the middle segment of the BA (arrow).
V1-VA-L
Fig. B26.5 Extracranial duplex, longitudinal plane (B-mode). Left V1-VA diameter 5.5 mm.
Fig. B26.4 Intracranial CTA, 3D reconstruction showing BA after stenting (arrows).
V2-VA-L
Fig. B26.6 Extracranial duplex, longitudinal plane (B-mode): Left V2-VA dilatation between the transverse processes of C5 and C6 (encircled by arrows) with a diameter of 10.5 mm (white dotted line) suggestive of dissecting aneurysm.