Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5776_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
53 Мб
Скачать
Fig. B21.17 DSA, right common carotid artery (CCA) injection,
posteroanterior view. Filling of both PCAs (arrowheads) from the right ICA via the PCoA.
359Discussion
Fig. B21.18 DSA, right ICA injection, lateral view. Retrograde lling
of the distal BA (single arrow) and SCA (arrows) via a strong PCoA (arrowhead).
There are no well-established therapeutic guidelines for intracranial dissections. Because of the increased risk of intracranial bleeding, anticoagulation is usually not performed. In dissecting aneurysms with or without SAH, anticoagulation is contraindicated. In ischemia of suspected thromboembolic origin, antiplatelet therapy is recommended (Schievink 2001). Experience with endo­vascular therapeutic approaches is rather limited and of questionable benefi t in BA dissection up to now (Li et al
2015). Interventional strategies such as stent implanta­tion or proximal vessel occlusion in the anterior and pos­terior circulation have been reported. However, stenting should be reserved for patients who, despite suffi cient medical treatment, have episodes of recurrent ischemia and in whom a hemodynamic etiology is proven (Kim et al 2015). For further discussion on intracranial stenting, see also Case 5 and Case 26.
Contrary to previous assumptions, patients with in­tracranial dissection usually have a good clinical outcome. As in extracranial dissections, an intramural hematoma and thrombus formation occurs which subsequently leads to embolism. This is then followed by a repair phase. Accordingly, single cases of vascular pathology remission (e.g., of thrombosis in an associated aneurysm) have been reported. However, as intracranial vasa vasorum are less well developed, the repair processes might be less eff ec- tive (Chen and Caplan 2005). In contrast to extracranial dissections, which reopen over time in most cases, only scarce positive data are available for intracranial dissec­tions (Ohkuma et al 2003). A small study in intracranial VA dissection reported complete vessel restitution in four of six patients (Kitanaka et al 1994a).
As in extracranial imaging, MRI can be used in the diag­nosis of intracranial dissections to visualize the intramu­ral hematoma. Instead of fat-saturated 2D T1-weighted
LR
Fig. B21.19 Schematic of the patient’s extra- and intracranial brain-supplying arteries. Mid-basilar occlusion (large circle) and left P1-PCA stenosis (small circle). Collateral blood fl ow toward both PCAs and into the distal BA via the right PCoA.
axial spin echo images, 3D T1-weighted fast spin echo sequences with variable fl ip angles (proprietary names VISTA, SPACE, or CUBE) have been recommended. These combine comprehensive neck coverage, high spatial res­olution, fat saturation, and black-blood eff ect (Edjlali et al 2013). Distinguishing between a dissecting aneurysm without SAH and a true aneurysm can be diffi cult. In these cases, serial follow-up studies may be of help.
In our patient, the unusual onset of headaches several days prior to stroke and the severe mid-basilar stenosis comprising an intima fl ap were indicative of an isolated spontaneous BA dissection. Because of the assumed high
360 Case 21 Mid-basilar Artery Occlusion Due to Intracranial Dissection
embolic risk, and after exclusion of SAH and dissecting aneurysms, we decided on initial intravenous PTT-guided heparinization. During this treatment a secondary BA oc­clusion occurred (for reading on BA occlusion, see Case 8). A potential explanation for this phenomenon could be an increase of the intramural hematoma, possibly facilitated by the anticoagulation. A similar course was observed in two of our other reported cases with extracranial ICA dis­section (see also Case 11 and Case 24).
Angiologic and Anatomic Aspects
In this patient an intracranial dissection was considered because of the narrowing of the BA in its mid part and the intimal fl ap seen on DSA imaging. As in extracranial eval- uation, a confi dent diagnosis may be diffi cult even using DSA if no intimal fl ap or dissecting aneurysm is seen. MRI may reveal intramural hematoma or an obvious widen­ing of the lumen, but the smaller vessel sizes may hinder detection. Multislice CTA is increasingly used for diagno­sis (Yoon et al 2007). A strange-looking long segmental stenosis may indicate a dissection but may also be seen in atherosclerosis, radiation-induced vasculopathy, par­tially recanalized embolic occlusions, and FMD without dissection.
Whenever ischemic stroke or TIA of the posterior cir­culation is suspected, cerebrovascular imaging should be performed immediately. The most sensitive technique for parenchymal imaging of the vertebrobasilar territory is MRI using diff usion-weighted images. The majority of patients with posterior circulation infarctions and TIAs lasting >1 hour present with acute MRI lesions (Kidwell et al 1999, Linfante et al 2001, Marx et al 2002). Cranial CT is of limited use for brainstem imaging because of typical beam-hardening artifacts in the posterior fossa.
However, in addition to imaging of the parenchy­mal lesions, rapid evaluation of the underlying vascular p a t h o l o g y i s e s s e n t i a l w h i l e m a k i n g t r e a t m e n t d e c i s i o n s . This applies to any ischemic stroke of the posterior circulation and especially if a BA occlusion is suspected. Early MRI studies using TOF-MRA sequences demon­strated a reasonable high sensitivity and specifi city for detecting occlusion in the brain-supplying arteries. New MRI techniques combining 3-T and sensitivity-encoding methods can increase the spatial resolution of TOF-MRA even further (Choi et al 2007). Diff erentiation of anatomic variants, i.e., BA fenestration, from intraluminal pathol­ogy may remain diffi cult when relying on MRA alone (Palazzo et al 2014). In presumed acute BA occlusion, however, multislice CT angiography (CTA) is the current method of choice (Bash et al 2005, Klingebiel et al 2002). DSA nevertheless remains relevant as a diagnostic meth­od, especially whenever therapeutic interventions (e.g., intra-arterial thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, balloon dilatation, or stenting) are being considered, although it may be inferior to CTA in precisely identifying a BA near-occlusion (Bash et al 2005) (for discussion on neuroimaging in intracranial occlusion, see also Case 10).
Little has been published about the relevance of pos­terior circulation diagnostic ultrasound under emergency conditions. A study comparing CTA and extracranial con­tinuous-wave Doppler combined with transcranial Dop-
pler (TCD) demonstrated that ultrasound fi ndings were specifi c but the sensitivity of the method was low (Brandt et al 1999). The use of extracranial and transcranial du­plex ultrasound, however, might lead to diff erent results and may be particularly valuable in centers with limited availability of DSA or CTA, for example.
In presumed BA pathology, both extracranial V2-VA segments should always be studied. If bilateral high­resistance fl ow signals characterized by high pulsatility and low fl ow velocity are present in normal-sized vessels a relevant distal obstruction is practically evident. How­ever, this is only true in normal-sized VAs as the same prestenotic pattern can also appear physiologically in VA hypoplasia (see also Chapter 2, “Extracranial Vertebral Artery” under “Special Arterial Anatomy and Ultrasound Anatomy”). Normal extracranial VA ultrasound fi ndings, on the contrary, cannot rule out distal BA pathology and therefore require additional transcranial insonation start­ing with the transforaminal approach. In cases of normal transforaminal fi ndings in both V4-VA segments and the proximal BA, a distal BA occlusion is unlikely, although an occlusive process at the top of the BA could still be pres­ent. One has to keep in mind that the mean visible trans­foraminal length of the BA is ~2 cm, which corresponds to the proximal two-thirds of the vessel (Iglseder et al 2000, Pade et al 2011, Schulte-Altedorneburg et al 2000). The last third is usually not accessible in adults by transforam­inal ultrasound. In proximal or mid-basilar BA occlusion a retrograde distal BA fl ow can be seen and was reported in fi ve patients with angiographically confi rmed proxi- mal BA occlusion via a transforaminal access and utilizing echo contrast agents (Koga et al 2002). A reversed BA sig­nal was also demonstrated in 8 of 12 patients studied by transforaminal power-motion TCD (Ribo et al 2004) (see also Case 41). However, careful analysis is required to avoid confusing the BA with the physiologic AICA signal, especially when TCD is used.
If the BA cannot be visualized transforaminally or if there are confl icting fi ndings, axial transtemporal inson- ation may be of help. This enables assessment of fl ow in both P1-PCA segments and in the top of the BA. A visible BA head and normal fl ow signals in one or both P1-PCAs almost defi nitively rules out BA occlusion. In mid- basilar occlusion, a retrograde fl ow may be found in the top of the BA and in at least one of the P1-PCA segments, together with a fl ow in one or both PCoAs toward the BA. If an insuffi cient transtemporal bone window hinders inson- ation, echo contrast agents can be used. Contrast admin­istration increases the vessel detection rate of the P1-PCA segment from 35% to 75% and of the BA head from 62% to 91%, in patients with ischemia of the posterior cir­culation (Stolz et al 2002b). If only the P2- or P3-PCA segments are visible—which is the case in almost all pa­tients even with insuffi cient temporal bone windows— simultaneous digital tapping of the dominant V3-VA at the atlas loop and the ipsilateral ICA at the submandib­ular level will help to clarify the fl ow pathways. A clearly positive oscillation eff ect during atlas loop tapping argues in favor of a blood supply to the PCA via the BA, which is a strong argument against occlusion within the BA. A more pronounced eff ect during ICA tapping argues in favor of a relevant BA fl ow obstacle but may also be observed in
361Discussion
the presence of a fetal-type PCA. Finally, the BA may be insonated in its middle and distal segments using the pos­terior coronal insonation plane, which might help to further clarify the vascular situation (for further reading, see also Chapter 2, “Distal Basilar Artery” under “Special Arterial Anatomy and Ultrasound Anatomy;” for ultrasound fi nd- ings in BA occlusion, see also Chapter 5, “BA Occlusion” under “Intracranial Pathology”). The combination of the aforementioned direct and indirect signs using modern ultrasound systems leads in fact to a high diagnostic cer­tainty, achievable even in the acute stroke patient. The use of echo contrast agents further improves the evalua­tion of the posterior circulation.
Several of the signs discussed above were present in our patient with a mid-basilar occlusion. Both extra- and intracranial VAs demonstrated high-resistance fl ow sig- nals despite the presence of normal vessel diameters. The mid and distal parts of the BA were not visible on transfo­raminal insonation, even after intravenous echo contrast administration. Finally, transtemporal insonation yielded a retrograde distal BA fl ow signal.
Ultrasonography of the posterior circulation, par­ticularly if done under time constraints, requires good technical equipment and an expert sonographer. A study reported positive experiences with a diagnostic protocol including transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) as the fi rst step in most of the patients with pre- sumed BA occlusion. CTA and/or subsequent DSA were performed only if the intracranial segments of the pos-
terior circulation were inaccessible by TCCS or if fi ndings were unclear (Kermer et al 2006).
As in the anterior circulation (e.g., in MCA occlusion), a particular benefi t of ultrasound is the opportunity to gain insights into the temporal dynamics, such as recanaliza­tion kinetics, which might help to assess prognosis or even infl uence subsequent therapeutic steps (see also Case 10).
Apart from its use for diagnostic purposes, ultrasound has also been shown to have a therapeutic potential not only in embolic occlusive disorders of the anterior cir­culation but also in BA occlusion. One study included 20 patients with BA occlusion <12 hours. Beside systemic rt­PA treat ment the p atien ts we re inso nated v ia th e tra ns­foraminal approach using a diagnostic 2-MHz transducer over 2 hours, and three boluses of an echo contrast agent were given. Complete recanalization was observed at 1 hour in 10% of cases, at 6 hours in 35%, and in 24 hours in 50%, rates which are higher than published data for thrombolysis alone (Pagola et al 2007). At 3 months, the reported mortality was 35% compared with 50% in those with systemic thrombolysis and 55% in those with in­tra-arterial thrombolysis (Lindsberg and Mattle 2006).
Each center will develop its own diagnostic protocols. In large institutions where all imaging modalities are availa­ble, CTA will probably be the fi rst diagnostic tool. However, 24-hour CTA and DSA are not yet widely available, so TCCS ultrasound systems in the hands of a well-trained sonog­rapher may have an important role as a screening tool or even in assumed BA pathology in the acute phase.
362
Case 22
Right Mid-part M1 Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion with Prominent Early Temporal Branch and Patent Foramen Ovale
Clinical Presentation
A 41-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency d e p a r t m e n t w i t h a c u t e w e a k n e s s o f h e r l e f t a r m a n d l e g . The symptoms had commenced 1 hour prior to presentation while she had been walking. No headaches were reported. The patient had no vascular risk factors except that she experienced about two migraine attacks with visual aura per month. On neurologic examination, the woman had left-sided supranuclear facial palsy, gaze deviation to the right side, and marked left sensorimotor hemiparesis ( N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e o f H e a l t h S t r o k e S c a l e [ N I H S S ] s c o r e : 1 2 ) .
Initial Neuroradiologic Findings
Emergency unenhanced cranial CT revealed mild early signs of infarction comprising less than one-third of the right middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory and a dense media sign. Perfusion CT showed a pronounced perfu­sion defi cit within the right hemisphere. CT angiography (CTA) depicted a right proximal M1-MCA occlusion. On the basis of these fi ndings and after considering exclu- sion criteria, intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV rt-PA) was performed (Fig. B22.1, Fig. B22.2, Fig. B22.3).
Suspected Diagnosis
Right M1-MCA occlusion of unknown origin.
Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
spectrum analysis of the right ICA showed a discrete increase in pulsatility and a mildly reduced fl ow velocity when compared with the left side (fl ow velocity: right ICA 54/22 cm/s, PI = 1.0; left ICA 67/32 cm/s, PI = 0.8). Normal ndings were seen in the other extracranial vessels.
Transcranial Duplex Sonography
Color-mode imaging revealed a discontinuous image of the presumed right M1-MCA segment only. Dop­pler spectrum analysis showed reduced fl ow velocity in the right proximal M1-MCA segment (fl ow velocity 60/30 cm/s). The middle M1-MCA segment signal was ab­sent. However, signals from the distal M1-MCA segment at a depth of 40 mm demonstrated a fl ow pattern simi- lar to the proximal segment. The right A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) revealed a mildly increased ow velocity with a high diastolic fl ow component (fl ow velocity 159/77 cm/s). A lower fl ow velocity was seen in the left A1-ACA segment (fl ow velocity 125/53 cm/s). The right posterior cerebral artery (PCA) showed higher fl ow velocities in the P2-PCA segment compared with the left P2-PCA segment (fl ow velocity: right, 87/30 cm/s; left, 50/20 cm/s) (Figs. B22.6–B22.12; see also Video
B22.1).
Conclusion
Reopening of the right M1-MCA segment after throm­bolysis but indirect signs of relevant distal fl ow occlusion at the M2-MCA level corresponding to TIBI (Thrombolysis In Brain Ischemia) grade 3 and COGIF (Consensus on Grading Intracranial Flow obstruction) grade 3. Leptomeningeal collateralization via the right ACA and PCA.
• Was there recanalization of the right MCA after intra­venous thrombolysis?
• Was there evidence of an embolic source in the internal carotid artery (ICA), such as atherosclerotic vessel wall changes or dissection?
Initial Neurosonologic Findings (Day 1)
Extracranial Duplex Sonography
There was no evidence of atherosclerotic vascular changes or dissection (Fig. B22.4 and Fig. B22.5). Doppler
Clinical Course (1)
Despite thrombolysis, the patient did not improve clinically. Follow-up cranial CT 1 day later showed subcortical infarc­tion, predominantly in the right putamen and a persisting hyperdense media sign (Fig. B22.13). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed a patent foramen ovale (PFO) with spontaneous right-to-left shunt but no atrial septum aneurysm. Deep vein thrombosis could have been a potential source for such a paradoxical embolic event but no signs were found by duplex ultrasound, and blood tests excluded thrombophilia.
363Neurosonologic Findings (Day 10)
Fig. B22.1 Unenhanced cranial CT, axial plane. Left: Hyperdense media sign on the right side indicating proximal M1-MCA occlusion (arrow). Right: Note the hypoattenuation of the right putamen (circle) and loss of cortical ribbon in the right MCA territory.
CBF
AB C
Fig. B22.3 Perfusion CT, rCBF, rCBV, and mean transit time (MTT) maps axial planes: cerebral blood fl ow/volume (CBF/CBV) mismatch indicating tissue at risk within the right MCA territory. (A) Decreased CBF (arrows). (B) Mildly reduced CBV. (C) Delayed MTT.
CBV MTT
Fig. B22.2 CTA, coronal maximal intensity projection (MIP). Prox­imal occlusion of the right M1-MCA segment (single arrow). The faint signal beneath the presumed M1-MCA segment was after­wards interpreted as an early temporal branch (short arrows). Note also the strong signals of the sylvian MCA branches (large arrows).
ICA-R
Fig. B22.4 Extracranial duplex, longitudinal plane. Mildly reduced
ow and increased pulsatility in the right ICA (fl ow velocity 54/22 cm/s, PI = 1.0).
Questions to Answer by Ultrasound Techniques
• Was there secondary reocclusion after systemic t h r o m b o l y s i s ?
• What was the magnitude of the cardiac right-to-left shunting based on neurosonologic testing?
in contrast with the contralateral side the vessel seemed to turn down toward the base of the skull. This segment was therefore thought to be an early prominent temporal branch of the M1-MCA and not the M1-MCA segment it­self, of which occlusion had initially been suspected. Un­changed, mildly increased fl ow velocities were seen in the right-sided A1-ACA and P2-PCA segments. In addition, a right-sided fetal-type PCA was found (not shown).
Neurosonologic Findings (Day 10)
PFO Testing
Transcranial Duplex Sonography
The reduced fl ow velocity persisted in the proximal MCA (fl ow velocity 66/31 cm/s). Again, there was impaired signal continuity in the mid M1-MCA segment despite the visual­ization of the lateral fi ssure and the assumed M1-MCA and,
At rest, three high-intensity transient signals were ob­served in the simultaneously insonated proximal MCAs after antecubital injection of ultrasound contrast agent (Echovist). Sixteen further such signals were seen after a controlled Valsalva maneuver (Fig. B22.14).
364 Case 22 Right Mid-part M1 Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion with Prominent Early Temporal Branch and Patent Foramen Ovale
ICA-L
Fig. B22.5 Extracranial duplex, longitudinal plane. Normal fl ow in the left ICA (fl ow velocity 67/32 cm/s, PI = 0.8).
M1-MCA-R
M1-MCA-R
Fig. B22.6 TCCS (t rans tempo ral approach) , right -sid ed in sona tion, midbrain plane. Reduced fl ow velocity but otherwise normal fl ow signal in projection of the right proximal M1-MCA at a depth of 53 mm (fl ow velocity 60/30 cm/s). Note that there is poor color imaging throughout the total length of the M1-MCA and a fl ow gap in its mid part (arrows).
M1-MCA-L
Fig. B22.7 TCCS (t rans tempo ral approach) , right -sid ed in sona tion, midbrain plane. Distal artery at a depth of 40 mm initially consid­ered to be the right distal M1-MCA revealing a reduced velocity (fl ow velocity 45/21 cm/s).
Conclusion
Right-sided mid-part M1-MCA occlusion. A patent early temporal M1-MCA branch was confused with the main stem in the initial ultrasound examination. Marked lep­tomeningeal collateralization via ACA and PCA. Small spontaneous right-to-left shunt and moderate right-to­left shunt during Valsalva maneuver in correlation with the echocardiographic fi ndings.
Neuroradiologic Findings (Day 11)
Cerebral MRI revealed hemorrhagic transformation in the area of infarction and mild local swelling. The in­farct area itself extended to the right insula and temporal lobe. Time-of-fl ight MR angiography (TOF-MRA) showed a right proximal M1-MCA occlusion. No temporal MCA
Fig. B22.8 TCCS (tr anst emporal appro ach) , left -sided insonati on, midbrain plane. Normal fl ow in the left M1-MCA (fl ow velocity 133/52 cm/s).
branch was visualized (Fig. B22.15 and Fig. B22.16). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed on the same day to resolve the confl icting evaluations. It confi rmed the presence of a mid-part M1-MCA occlusion, a prominent temporal MCA branch, and leptomeningeal collaterals from the ACA and PCA as well as the fetal-type PCA (Fig. B22.17, Fig. B22.18, Fig. B22.19).
Fig. B22.19 shows a schematic of the patient’s extra-
and intracranial brain-supplying arteries.
Clinical Course (2)
Paradoxical embolism was suspected as a potential cause of stroke on the basis of the PFO. As a diff erential diag- nosis, an in-situ thrombus was also considered because of the persisting M1-MCA occlusion after 11 days of stroke, which seems long for typical cardiac embolism,
365Final Diagnosis
A1-ACA-R
Fig. B22.9 TCCS (t rans tempo ral approach) , right -sid ed in sona tion, midbrain plane. Mildly increased fl ow velocity with high diastolic ow component in the right A1-ACA indicating leptomeningeal col­lateral fl ow (fl ow velocity 159/77cm/s).
P2-PCA-R
A1-ACA-L
Fig. B22.10 TCCS (trans temp oral ap proa ch), left-s ided ins onati on, midbrain plane. Normal fi ndings in the left A1-ACA (fl ow velocity 125/53 cm/s).
P2-PCA-L
Fig. B22.11 TCCS (transtemporal approach), right-sided inson­ation, thalamic plane. Right distal P2-PCA with mildly raised fl ow velocities in comparison with the contralateral side indicating lep­tomeningeal collateral fl ow (fl ow velocity 87/30 cm/s).
p a r t i c u l a r l y f o l l o w i n g s y s t e m i c t h r o m b o l y s i s . H o w e v ­er, the defi nitive etiology remained unclear. The patient was referred to a neurologic rehabilitation unit. After 3 months, no further clinical events had occurred during anticoagulation therapy but the neurologic defi cit had de- creased. At this time an endovascular device occlusion of the PFO was performed without our involvement. Long­term stroke prevention was switched to antiplatelet ther­apy with aspirin. The patient was then lost to follow-up.
Final Diagnosis
Large ischemic stroke in the right MCA territory caused by a right mid-part M1-MCA occlusion. Suspected cardiac embolism due to the presence of a PFO. Collateralization via a patent early temporal MCA branch originating prox­imal to the occlusion as well as via leptomeningeal path­ways from the ACA and PCA.
Fig. B22.12 TCCS, (tr anst emporal approa ch), le ft-s ided in sona ­tion, midbrain plane. Normal fl ow in the left P2-PCA (fl ow velocity 50/20 cm/s).
Fig. B22.13 Unenhanced follow-up cranial CT (1 day later), axial plane. Left: Persisting hyperdense media sign (arrow). Right: Demarcation of a large putaminal infarction.
366 Case 22 Right Mid-part M1 Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion with Prominent Early Temporal Branch and Patent Foramen Ovale
Fig. B22.14 Foramen ovale test: Bilateral M1­MCA TCD monitoring. High-intensity transient signals (arrows) in both MCAs (left > right) ap­pearing during Valsalva maneuver, indicative of
Valsalva
right-to-left shunting.
Fig. B22.15 Left: MR T2-weighted image, axial plane (day 11). Hemorrhagic transformation of the infarction with mild local e d e m a . C o m p a r e d w i t h t h e e a r l i e r C T , i n f a r c t s i z e h a s i n c r e a s e d , now also partially aff ecting the right insula and temporal lobe. Right: 3D TOF-MRA, coronal MIP. Proximal M1-MCA occlusion ( a r r o w ) . T h e e a r l y t e m p o r a l b r a n c h a s w e l l a s t h e s y l v i a n M C A branches is not visualized. Note the large bright artifact caused by hemorrhagic transformation of the infarction.
Discussion
Clinical Aspects
Here we discuss a 41-year-old woman with right MCA infarction caused by a mid-part M1-MCA occlusion. Col­lateralization occurred in part via an early temporal MCA branch, which proved diffi cult to assess not only by ultra- sound but also by MRA and CTA. Considering the acute treatment for stroke and systemic thrombolysis in this patient, we draw attention to the extended discussion in Case 10. A cardiac embolic event seemed to be the most likely etiology because of the PFO and the spontaneous
Fig. B22.16 DSA, left ICA injection, posteroanterior view. Normal
lling of intracranial arteries. Note the straight course of the M1­MCA as expected in a young patient without arterial hypertension as well as a small proximal and a more prominent distal temporal MCA branch (arrowheads).
cardiac right-to-left shunt. Another potential risk factor was migraine with aura.
The association between PFO and cryptogenic stroke is well established. Anatomically, a PFO is in most cases an insignifi cant connection between the right and the left cir- culation at the atrial level. It can be diagnosed directly in vivo by TEE if spontaneous or Valsalva-induced shunting of microbubbles is seen after injection of an ultrasound contrast agent. It may also be seen during conventional catheter examination. Its prevalence decreases with in­creasing age. In an autopsy study of 965 patients the prev­alence ranged from 34% in the 1–29-year-old population to 20% in subjects >80 years of age (Hagen et al 1984).
367Discussion
Fig. B22.17 DSA, right ICA injection (early arterial phase), pos­teroanterior view. Mid-part M1-MCA occlusion (single arrow). Note the prominent early temporal MCA branch (arrows). Contrast fi lling of the PCA, indicating a fetal-type PCA (arrowhead).
S i m i l a r r e s u l t s w e r e r e p o r t e d u s i n g T E E , y i e l d i n g a p r e v ­alence of 25.6% in subjects with a mean age of 45 years (Meissner et al 1999). The shunt volume of the PFO may decrease over time and the PFO may even disappear, es­pecially in patients after cryptogenic stroke (Tanislav et al
2010). Peak exercise before Valsalva strain may, however, lead to reoccurrence (Reichenberger et al 2013).
If stroke is related to a PFO a paradoxical embolism from the venous system into the cerebral circulation is hypothesized. However, venous thrombi are found in only ~10% of patients with PFO and cerebral ischemia (Lethen et al 1997). Other hypotheses are that the PFO itself is the source of embolism as it has a tunnel-like structure with a low net fl ow which might subsequently lead to thrombus formation. In addition, patients with PFO more often have atrial arrhythmias, which in turn might lead to intra-atrial thrombus formation (Berthet et al 2000). Several case–control studies have shown a high prevalence of PFO in cryptogenic stroke. In pa­tients <40 years of age it has been seen in 40% of cases compared with 15% of controls (Webster et al 1988). An identical prevalence was observed in a patient group <55 years of age compared to 10% in controls. In this study, patients with no identifi able cause of stroke had an even higher prevalence (54%), whereas only 21% of patients with a determined etiology had this condi­tion (Lechat et al 1988). Medium to large PFOs (≥2 mm) were more frequently found among cryptogenic strokes and showed larger infarcts on imaging (Jung et al 2013, Steiner et al 1998).
This observation is supported by TCD emboli detection studies, which found an association between large PFOs and increased rates of spontaneous microembolic signals (Telman et al 2008, Kobayashi et al 2009). Other studies,
Fig. B22.18 DSA, right ICA injection (late arterial phase), pos­teroanterior view. Leptomeningeal collateralization of the MCA territory via ACA (arrows) and early temporal MCA branch (arrow).
RL
Fig. B22.19 Schematic of the patient’s extra- and intracranial brain-supplying arteries. Mid-part M1-MCA occlusion on the right side (circle). Collateralization of the MCA territory via an early tem­poral MCA branch as well as leptomeningeal collaterals from the right ACA and right PCA via the right fetal-type PCA.
however, demonstrated that there was no relation be­tween shunt volume and infarct size and that the inci­dence of large shunts in presumed PFO-related stroke was not increased (Akhondi et al 2010, Wessler et al 2014). A recent meta-analysis of 14 studies including 4,251 p a t i e n t s c o n c l u d e d t h a t P F O s i z e d o e s n o t c o r r e l a t e w i t h the risk of recurrent stroke. Interestingly, no increased risk for recurrent stroke or TIA in stroke patients with PFO was found compared to stroke patients without PFO (Katsanos et al 2014b).
368 Case 22 Right Mid-part M1 Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion with Prominent Early Temporal Branch and Patent Foramen Ovale
Besides PFO, an atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) has also been linked with stroke. ASA is a localized saccular de­formity, generally at the level of the oval fossa. In contrast to PFO, diff erent defi nitions of ASA have been used. Some authors have defi ned an atrial septum extension 11 mm beyond the plane of the atrial septum into either the right or left atrium or both as an ASA (Mas et al 2001). Oth­ers used a 10 mm extension into the left or right atrium (Homma et al 2002) or a 15 mm extension into one or both atria as cut-off values (Bonati et al 2006). The cur- rent guidelines of the American Heart Association defi ne an ASA as a 10 mm excursion in the septum (Furie et al
2011). An extension <10 mm is therefore considered as a hypermobile septum.
The prevalence of ASA is far lower than that of PFO. The population-based Stroke Prevention Assessment of Risk in a Community (SPARC) study, which analyzed 581 subjects aged 45 years, found an ASA in 2.2% sub­jects (Meissner et al 1999). Autopsy analysis revealed a prevalence of 1% for ASA (Hagen et al 1984). In subjects with ASA, a concomitant PFO is found in about one-third of cases (Mügge et al 1995). In patients with cryptogenic stroke aged 18 to 55 years an ASA may be present in up to 10% of patients, while up to 19% of patients with PFO have an ASA in addition (Mas et al 2001). ASAs vary in size and, like PFOs, their infl uence on stroke risk is controversial. In one study, patients with PFO and an ASA extending >10 mm in one or both directions were found to have an increased stroke risk (Cabanes et al 1993). Another study demonstrated that PFO is an independent risk factor for cryptogenic stroke in the age group >55 years, with an increasing association in patients with an additionally di­agnosed ASA (Handke et al 2007).
Treat men t strate gies aft er cry ptoge nic s tro ke an d sep ­tal abnormalities are controversial. An early large study indicated that aspirin alone is suffi cient to prevent recur- rence in cryptogenic stroke with PFO but not with a com­bined septal pathology. Analyzing 581 aspirin-treated stroke patients aged 18–55 years (216 with PFO, 10 with ASA alone, 51 with both conditions, 304 without septal abnormalities) over 4 years, the annual risk of recurrence was 0.6% in the PFO group, 3.8% if an ASA was additionally present, 1.1% if no septal abnormalities were seen, and 0% if only an ASA was present (Mas et al 2001). The increased risk in combined ASA and PFO was underlined by a higher rate of silent infarctions compared with PFO alone (Bonati et al 2006). In some countries long-term oral anticoag­ulation or interventional closure was therefore recom­mended instead of aspirin. Diff erent conclusions were drawn from the PICSS trial (PFO in Cryptogenic Stroke Study) which compared the 2-year outcomes in 630 pa­tients with PFO and stroke (265 of them with cryptogenic stroke) who were randomized to either aspirin or war­farin. No signifi cant superiority of warfarin over aspirin was seen (16.5% versus 13.2%), which was also independ­ent of the presence and the size of the PFO, or the associ­ation with an ASA (Homma et al 2002).
Three further randomized trials comparing interven­tional PFO closure with antithrombotic treatment in pa­tients after ischemic stroke have so far been published (Carroll et al 2013, Furlan et al 2012, Meier et al 2013). The CLOSURE I and PCA studies recruited patients with TIA or
stroke, the RESPECT study included patients after stroke only. The decision between platelet inhibitor therapy and oral anticoagulation in the medically treated groups was left to the treating physician. None of the three studies could in fact demonstrate signifi cant superiority of the interventional PFO closure. The annual stroke risk in the medical treatment group ranged from 0.6% to 1.5%, which was lower than initially expected. The calculated number of cases for all the above trials was based on an assumed stroke risk of 3–4%, which turned out to be twice as high as was eventually observed in the conventionally treated patients. A subgroup analysis in the RESPECT trial yielded a statistically signifi cant advantage for PFO closure in pa- tients with ASA or a large shunt, but the CLOSURE I and the PCA trial could not reproduce this fi nding. The periproce- dural complication rate in the interventionally treated groups ranged from 0% to 4.2%. In the CLOSURE I trials, atrial fi brillation occurred in 5.7% of patients with an in- serted device and in 0.7% of the medically treated patients.
On the basis of the available data, several rather contradictory meta-analyses have been published (Kitsios et al 2012) as they range from “clear benefi t from PFO closure” (Khan et al 2013), to doubting superiority of closure (Spencer et al 2014) and even to “increased stroke risk” for patients with PFO closure (Udell et al 2014).
From the above discussion, we can currently summa­rize as follows: Young patients after cryptogenic stroke who have a PFO without ASA should be treated with platelet inhibition unless any other indication for anti­coagulation is found. So far there is no convincing data available which could prove superiority of oral anticoagu­lation over platelet inhibition in the above condition. Only if other factors are present—such as clear evidence for a paradoxical embolism (with triggering Valsalva maneu­ver and concomitant deep venous thrombosis), anamnes­tic hints of spontaneous thromboses in the past, a family history of thromboses or a thrombophilia—then antico­agulation should be considered, at least temporarily. PFO closure cannot currently be recommended and can only be considered in selected individual cases.
With increasing age, the rate of cryptogenic strokes decreases as the underlying stroke mechanism can more often be identifi ed. However, valid data on the actual stroke risk of PFO in the elderly population does not exist.
Percutaneous PFO closure is successful in 98% of cases (Windecker et al 2000). Intervention-related severe com­plications such as death, a life-threatening bleed, embolic events, or cardiac tamponades have been reported in 1.5% of patients. Less relevant side eff ects such as arrhythmi- as, device arm fracture, device embolization, and device thrombosis were reported in 7.9% of cases (Homma and Sacco 2005).
In our present case of cryptogenic stroke in a young patient, a PFO without accompanying ASA was present. A cardiac embolus or paradoxical embolic event seemed possible but could not be proven. The fi nal decision to close the PFO was a result of an extended ambulatory cardiologic consultation with the patient and was fi nal- ly performed at the request of the patient herself. From a neurologic point of view, there was no indication for interventional PFO closure. Postinterventional follow-up information has not been available to us.