Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5770_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Earliest History
- •1.3 The 1970s
- •2.4.3 Spatial Resolution
- •2.5.1 Reverberation Artifact
- •2.5.2 Comet-Tail Artifact
- •2.5.3 Mirror-Image Artifact
- •2.5.4 Shadowing Artifact
- •2.5.5 Posterior Enhancement Artifact
- •2.6 Doppler
- •2.7 Summary
- •References
- •Suggested Reading
- •1.5 Expanded Applications
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.4.2 Attenuation
- •3.1 General Notes
- •3.3.3 The Lateral Neck Compartment
- •References
- •4: Interventional Ultrasonography
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 General Techniques
- •4.3 Indications
- •4.3.1 Punctures
- •Cytologic Examinations (Fine Needle Aspiration)
- •Histologic Examinations (Core Biopsy)
- •4.4 Catheterization
- •4.4.2 Vascular Access/Cannulas
- •4.6 Technical Remarks
- •References
- •5.1.1 Reactive Lymphadenopathy
- •5.1.2 Tuberculous Lymphadenopathy
- •5.1.3 Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) Lymphadenopathy
- •5.1.5 Suppurative Lymphadenopathy (Abscesses)
- •5.1.8 Malignant Lymphoma Nodes
- •5.2.1 Central/Anterior Lymphadenopathy
- •Thyroid Cancer
- •5.2.2 Lateral Lymphadenopathy
- •Thyroid Gland Cancer
- •Non-tuberculous Lymphadenopathy
- •Tuberculous Lymphadenopathy
- •5.2.3 Posterior Lymphadenopathy
- •HNSCC Lymph Node Metastases
- •Tuberculous Lymphadenopathy
- •5.3 Cystic/Necrotic Lymphadenopathy
- •5.3.2 Malignant Lymphadenopathies
- •HPV-Positive Metastases
- •EBV-Positive Metastases
- •Thyroid Carcinoma Lymph Node Metastases
- •Lymphoma Nodes
- •References
- •6.1 General Notes
- •6.3.1 Atheroma
- •6.3.2 Lipoma
- •6.3.4 Fistula
- •6.4.1 Branchial Cysts
- •6.4.2 Thyroglossal Cysts
- •6.5.1 Carotid Body Tumor
- •6.5.2 Neurinoma
- •6.5.3 Rare Tumors
- •6.6 Posttraumatic Changes
- •6.6.2 Foreign Bodies
- •References
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2.1 Pre-styloid Compartment
- •8.2.2 Post-styloid Compartment
- •8.3.1 Clinical Evaluation
- •8.3.2 Physical Examination
- •8.3.3 Family History
- •8.4 Diagnostic Imaging
- •8.5 Sonographic Technique
- •8.5.1 Grayscale Images
- •8.5.2 Doppler Images
- •8.5.3 Sonographic Approach
- •8.7 Primary Lesions
- •8.7.1 Schwannoma
- •8.7.3 Paraganglioma
- •8.7.4 Lipoma
- •8.7.6 Branchial Cleft Cyst
- •8.8 Secondary Lesions
- •8.8.1 Salivary Gland Tumors
- •8.8.2 Nodal Metastasis
- •8.8.3 Abscess
- •8.9 Treatment
- •8.9.1 Surgical Approaches
- •8.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Suprahyoid Space
- •Neoplasms
- •Suprahyoid Cystic Lesions
- •9.2.2 Masticator Space
- •9.3 Infrahyoid Space
- •10.2 Anatomical Remarks
- •10.3 Technical Remarks
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.5.1 Carotid Artery Pathology
- •Carotid Intima-Media Thickness (IMT)
- •Carotid Artery Stenosis
- •10.5.2 Carotid Artery Dissection/Aneurysm
- •10.6.2 Dynamic Sonopalpation
- •10.6.3 Transcranial Doppler Sonography
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.1 Infectious Sialadenitis
- •Bacterial Sialadenitis
- •Viral Sialadenitis
- •11.2.2 Autoimmune Sialadenitis
- •Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •Sarcoidosis
- •IgG4-Associated Sialadenitis
- •11.2.3 Radiation-Induced Sialadenitis
- •11.2.4 Chronic Recurrent Parotitis
- •11.3 Sialadenosis
- •11.4 Duct-Associated Disease
- •11.4.1 Obstructive Sialadenitis
- •11.4.2 Duct Cysts
- •11.5 Neoplasms
- •11.5.1 Benign Tumors
- •Pleomorphic Adenoma
- •Monomorphic Adenoma
- •11.5.2 Malignant Tumors
- •Lymphoma
- •References
- •12.2.1 Size (Small Nodules, Large Nodules, Large Goiter)
- •12.2.2 Echogenicity (Hyperechoic, Hypoechoic, Isoechoic)
- •12.2.4 Margins (Regular, Suspicious, Irregular)
- •12.2.7 Elastography
- •12.3 Thyroiditis
- •12.4 Graves’ Disease
- •12.5.1 American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines
- •References
- •13.4 Ultrasound Technique
- •13.8 Summary
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Anatomical Remarks
- •14.3 Technical Remarks
- •14.4.1 Acute Sinusitis
- •14.4.2 Chronic Sinusitis
- •14.4.4 Postoperative Care
- •14.4.5 Paranasal Sinus Tumors
- •14.6.1 Abscesses
- •14.6.2 Benign Lesions
- •14.6.3 Malignant Lesions
- •14.7.1 Technical Remarks
- •14.7.2 Ultrasound Anatomy
- •Graves’ Ophthalmopathy
- •Orbital Tumors
- •Malignant Tumors
- •Fractures
- •References
- •15: Endoscopic Ultrasound
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.3.4 Larynx
- •15.3.5 Trachea
- •15.3.6 Hypopharynx
- •15.3.7 Proximal Esophagus
- •15.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •16: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: Clinical Applications
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2.1 Safety Considerations
- •16.2.2 Regulatory Status
- •16.3.1 Salivary Gland Tumors
- •Pleomorphic Adenoma
- •Carcinoma Ex Pleomorphic Adenoma
- •Cystadenolymphoma (Warthin’s Tumor)
- •Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •16.3.4 Lymph Nodes
- •Malignant Lymphomas
- •Carcinoma Metastasis
- •16.3.5 Paragangliomas
- •16.3.7 Tumor Response Assessment
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.3 3D/4D Ultrasound
- •17.4 Computerized Ultrasound Image Analysis
- •17.5 Molecular Imaging
- •17.6 Targeted Therapy
- •17.7 Elastography
- •References
- •Index

46
ab
U. W. Geistho and L. A. Orlo
Fig. 4.8 (a) A cannula is
introduced into a venous
malformation of the tongue
under sonographic control. In
the middle of the steel needle
lies a bare ber, which is
advanced to coagulate the
tissue. (b) The coagulation
effect can be monitored by
ultrasound
a b
Fig. 4.9 (a) A drain has been placed into a stenotic left Stensen’s duct
under sonographic control. (From Jecker etal. [29], with permission.)
(b) The probe that has been used for positioning the drain is still inside
diameter of the duct [28, 29]. The effect of the dilation
the drain. co oral cavity (cavitas oris), mand mandible, mm masseter
muscle, sd Stensen’s duct
4.4.2 Vascular Access/Cannulas
process can be well seen by ultrasound. Plastic or metal
dilators can be placed from distal to the stenosis by sonographic control. However, the process of dilation is usually
difcult to visualize, as the dilators not only widen the
duct but also move it parallel or sideward to the ultrasound
transducer (Video 4.7).
Stents or drains can be used to keep the lumen of the
dilated duct open (Fig.4.9). However, this is not universally
recommended. Some authors favor only irrigation of the
fresh wound with corticosteroids. Stents can be placed under
sonographic control (see Video 4.7).
Ultrasound-guided vascular access, which is increasingly
used by anesthesiologists and hospitalists, can also be used
by head and neck surgeons [30]. After identication of the
target vessel, the catheter is usually introduced by either the
short-axis or long-axis technique (Video 4.8). It is important to remember that the venous pressure in the area of
interest must be sufcient, which can be achieved by placing the region of interest in a dependent position, by the
Valsalva maneuver, or by asking the anesthesiologist to
increase the PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure).

4 Interventional Ultrasonography
ab
c
47
Fig. 4.10 (a) Outer aspect of a venous malformation of the right
cheek. The intermittent swelling led to recurrent asymmetry and discomfort. (b, c) Axial and coronal MRI views of this venous malformation (Courtesy of Prof. Dr. Bien and Dr. Gurschi, Neuroradiology, Univ.
A special form of vascular access is the catheterization of a
vascular anomaly for radiologically controlled sclerosis, a
technique that overlaps with the instillation of therapeutic liquids as discussed above. In this case, the lesion is only identied and punctured under sonographic control. After
establishing the access, the sclerosing procedure is performed
under sonographic control. Figure4.10 shows the outer and
imaging aspects of a venous malformation before therapy.
Video 4.9 demonstrates the ow inside the lesion and the needle inside it. Figure4.11 shows the angiographic aspect of the
lesion after injection of contrast material and Histoacryl glue.
d
of Marburg). (d) Sonographic view of the same venous malformation.
Sometimes the ow is very low and can barely be detected by duplex
sonography. In this case, slight compression of the lesion can induce a
visible ow, as in Video 4.9a
Ultrasound also can be used to select the more suitable
side for implantation of a port into the cephalic vein.
4.5 Treatment ofSialolithiasis
4.5.1 Mobilization oftheStone forDrainage
Stones can be mobilized either using the nger (Video 4.10) or
by inserting a probe into the duct (Video 4.11), allowing blocked
saliva or pus to be excreted. The effect is often only of short

48
a b
U. W. Geistho and L. A. Orlo
Fig. 4.11 Angiography performed after direct puncture of the venous
malformation shown in Fig.4.10 and Video 4.9, with injection of contrast material (a) and Histoacryl glue mixed with contrast material for
duration, as the ow of the secretion will return most stones to
the same position, but sometimes a different position is achieved,
which leaves enough space next to the stone for secretion.
4.5.2 Extraction oftheStones
(Basket or Forceps)
Not only probes but also other instruments can be introduced
into the duct through the natural papilla. In addition to ultrasound control, other methods of guidance can be used,
including sialendoscopy, haptics, or x-ray (with the disadvantage of radiation exposure) [29]. Haptics are often only
sufcient if the pathology is very near to the papilla.
Sialendoscopy is often an excellent measure, but it requires
special instrumentation and experience. Additionally, part of
the duct lumen is occupied by the endoscope, which can prevent the use of larger instruments. It can be helpful to combine different methods (multimodal therapy) to increase the
success rate [31].
Both baskets (Fig. 4.12) and miniforceps (such as those
used for ear surgery) (Figs.4.13, 4.14, and 4.15) can be introduced into the lumen of Stensen’s or Wharton’s duct. This frequently rst requires the dilation of the papilla. Afterward, the
instrument is directed toward the stone. Reaching the stone can
be difcult or even impossible if the duct is tortuous, stenotic,
or bifurcated distal to the stone. When the stone is reached, the
instrument jaws or wires are opened, and the stone is grasped
sclerosis (b). (Courtesy of Prof. Dr. Bien and Dr. Gurschi,
Neuroradiology, Univ. of Marburg)
and extracted (Video 4.12). Extraction is possible only if the
duct diameter allows it, however. If in doubt, instruments such
as forceps or half- open baskets should be used, which can release
the stone in case of blockage. Sometimes, a mini-papillotomy is
necessary to overcome the papilla.
4.5.3 Fragmentation ofStones
If the diameter of the stone is too large in relationship to
theduct, either the duct has to be dilated, or the stone must
be broken into smaller pieces by methods such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or intraductal
pneumatic or laser lithotripsy under sialendoscopic control.
Fragmentation by forceps under sialendoscopic control is
also possible, but because these forceps are often very small,
they can crush only soft stones. Forceps for middle ear surgery, of different diameters and shapes, usually allow application of sufcient force and can be controlled by ultrasound
[32, 33]. The fragmentation of the stone can often be felt,
heard, and seen on the ultrasound screen (Fig.4.14, Video
4.13). Often multiple crushing closures of the jaws are necessary. Afterward, the fragments are removed as described
above (Fig.4.15).
ESWL for salivary gland stones is also performed under
sonographic control. Figures4.16 and 4.17 show the setting
of ESWL, and Video 4.14 shows the picture on the ultrasound screen during the procedure.

ab
4 Interventional Ultrasonography
Fig. 4.12 (a) A small stone (arrow) inside the right Stensen’s duct (single arrowhead) is grasped by a Dormia basket (four arrowheads). Mand
mandible, MM masseter muscle, PG parotid gland. (b) A small stone has been extracted by a Dormia basket
49
Fig. 4.13 A small forceps has been introduced into the right Stensen’s
duct and is now monitored by ultrasonography
Fig. 4.15 A miniforceps and a salivary gland stone that was frag-
mented under sonographic control
4.6 Technical Remarks
Industry offers quite a variety of devices that can be used for
Fig. 4.14 Forceps introduced in right Stensen’s duct and grasping a
stone. (From Jecker etal. [29], with permission)
ultrasound-guided procedures. Echogenicity of the tip of
instruments can sometimes be improved by turning the tapered
section of the needle tip toward the ultrasound transducer, as
this leads to an additional reection plane. A further increase
of echogenicity is produced by the roughening of the polished
metal surfaces near the needle tip (see Fig.4.7). As the price is
higher than that of normal needles, such needles are used only
for more complex circumstances, such as for treatment of
handicapped children under local anesthesia.

50
Fig. 4.16 Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) using the
Minilith system (Storz Medical, Switzerland). The treatment cushion
containing the ultrasound head and the electromagnetic shock wave
generator are positioned over the stone
Fig. 4.17 The ultrasound screen of the ESWL machine shows cross-
hairs in which the stone must be positioned
Attachable needle guides available for some transducers
correspond to diagonal lines projected onto the image on the
screen. However, they limit exibility in biopsy direction.
Additionally, they can never compensate for a bend of the
needle. Such guides are rarely necessary once experience
with ultrasound guidance has been obtained.
U. W. Geistho and L. A. Orlo
References
1. Yuen HY, Lee YY, Bhatia K, Ahuja AT.A short review of basic head
and neck interventional procedures in a general radiology department. Cancer Imaging. 2013;13:502–11.
2. Joshi AS, Sood AJ. Ultrasound-guided needle localization during open parotid sialolithotomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2014;151:59–64.
3. Kim JH. Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy for benign non-thyroid
cystic mass in the neck. Ultrasonography. 2014;33:83–90.
4. Berenguer B, Burrows PE, Zurakowski D, Mulliken
JB.Sclerotherapy of craniofacial venous malformations: complications and results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1–11; discussion
2–5.
5. Karp BI, Alter K. Botulinum toxin treatment of blepharospasm,
orofacial/oromandibular dystonia, and hemifacial spasm. Semin
Neurol. 2016;36:84–91.
6. Schramm A, Baumer T, Fietzek U, Heitmann S, Walter U, Jost
WH. Relevance of sonography for botulinum toxin treatment of
cervical dystonia: an expert statement. J Neural Transm (Vienna).
2015;122:1457–63.
7. Farrugia MK, Nicholls EA. Intradermal botulinum A toxin injection for axillary hyperhydrosis. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:1668–9.
8. Barbero P, Busso M, Artusi CA, De Mercanti S, Tinivella M,
Veltri A, et al. Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin-A injections:
a method of treating sialorrhea. J Vis Exp. 2016;(117) https://doi.
org/10.3791/54606.
9. Petracca M, Guidubaldi A, Ricciardi L, Ialongo T, Del Grande A,
Mulas D, etal. Botulinum toxin A and B in sialorrhea: Long-term
data and literature overview. Toxicon. 2015;107(Pt A):129–40.
10. Porte M, Chaleat-Valayer E, Patte K, D’Anjou MC, Boulay C,
Laffont I.Relevance of intraglandular injections of botulinum toxin
for the treatment of sialorrhea in children with cerebral palsy: a
review. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014;18:649–57.
11. Shariat-Madar B, Chun RH, Sulman CG, Conley SF. Safety of
ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injections for sialorrhea as
performed by pediatric otolaryngologists. Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg. 2016;154:924–7.
12. Ali MJ, Orloff LA, Lustig LR, Eisele DW.Botulinum toxin in the
treatment of rst bite syndrome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2008;139:742–3.
13. Ghosh A, Mirza N.First bite syndrome: Our experience with intraparotid injections with botulinum toxin type A. Laryngoscope.
2016;126:104–7.
14. Capaccio P, Cuccarini V, Benicchio V, Minorati D, Spadari F,
Ottaviani F. Treatment of iatrogenic submandibular sialocele
with botulinum toxin. Case report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
2007;45:415–7.
15. Chow TL, Kwok SP. Use of botulinum toxin type A in a case of
persistent parotid sialocele. Hong Kong Med J. 2003;9:293–4.
16. Pantel M, Volk GF, Guntinas-Lichius O, Wittekindt C.Botulinum
toxin type B for the treatment of a sialocele after parotidectomy.
Head Neck. 2013;35:E11–2.
17. Austin T, Davis J, Chan T.Sialolithiasis of submandibular gland. J
Emerg Med. 2004;26:221–3.
18. de Bree R, Duyndam JE, Kuik DJ, Leemans CR.Repeated botulinum toxin type A injections to treat patients with Frey syndrome.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135:287–90.
19. Drobik C, Laskawi R, Schwab S.Therapy of Frey syndrome with
botulinum toxin A.Experiences with a new method of treatment.
[Article in German]. HNO. 1995;43:644–8.
20. Yamamoto S, Maeda N, Yoshimura K, Oka M. Intraoperative
detection of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients using
ultrasonography-guided direct indocyanine green dye-marking by
real-time virtual sonography constructed with three-dimensional
computed tomography-lymphography. Breast. 2013;22:933–7.

4 Interventional Ultrasonography
51
21. Eppstein AC, Munshi IA, Sakamoto B, Gwirtz K.Ultrasonographyguided identication with methylene blue tattooing of the ilioinguinal nerve for neurectomy for chronic pain: a case series. JAMA
Surg. 2015;150:180–2.
22. Hiremath R, Reddy H, Ibrahim J, Haritha CH, Shah RS.Soft tissue foreign body: utility of high resolution ultrasonography. J Clin
Diagn Res. 2017;11:TC14–6.
23. Paziana K, Fields JM, Rotte M, Au A, Ku B.Soft tissue foreign
body removal technique using portable ultrasonography. Wilderness
Environ Med. 2012;23:343–8.
24. Ahn D, Kim H, Sohn JH, Choi JH, Na KJ. Surgeon-performed
ultrasound-guided ne-needle aspiration cytology of head and neck
mass lesions: sampling adequacy and diagnostic accuracy. Ann
Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1360–5.
25. Kraft M, Laeng H, Schmuziger N, Arnoux A, Gurtler
N.Comparison of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy and neneedle aspiration in the assessment of head and neck lesions. Head
Neck. 2008;30:1457–63.
26. Saha S, Woodhouse NR, Gok G, Ramesar K, Moody A, Howlett
DC.Ultrasound guided core biopsy, ne needle aspiration cytology
and surgical excision biopsy in the diagnosis of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck: an eleven year experience. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:792–5.
27. Werner JA, Lippert BM, Gottschlich S, Folz BJ, Fleiner B, Hoeft
S, et al. Ultrasound-guided interstitial Nd: YAG laser treatment
of voluminous hemangiomas and vascular malformations in 92
patients. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:463–70.
28. Geisthoff U, Hoffmanns L, Al-Habib A, Maune S.Sonographisch
kontrollierte, minimal-invasive Verfahren zur Behandlung der
obstruktiven Sialadenitis aktuelle Ergebnisse und neue Techniken.
Abstractband zur 84 Jahresversammlung der Deutschen
Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und HalsChirurgie eV, 8-1252013 Nürnberg. Mönchengladbach: Rheinware
Verlag; 2013.
29. Jecker P, Geisthoff U, Meyer JE, Orloff LA.Salivary gland ultrasonography. In: Orloff LA, editor. Head and neck ultrasonography.
2nd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing Inc.; 2017.
30. Wacker F, Wolf KJ, Fobbe F.Percutaneous vascular access guided
by color duplex sonography. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:1501–4.
31. Geisthoff U.Techniques for multimodal salivary gland stone therapy. Oper Tech Otolaryngol. 2007;18:332–40.
32. Geisthoff UW, Lehnert BK, Verse T.Ultrasound-guided mechanical intraductal stone fragmentation and removal for sialolithiasis: a
new technique. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:690–4.
33. Geisthoff UW, Maune S.Ultrasound-guided mechanical fragmentation of sialoliths (sonoguide forceps). Head Neck. 2010;32:1641–7.

Sonography ofLymph Nodes
intheNeck
JensE.Meyer
5
Lymph nodes occur frequently in the neck area. In most
cases, they are benign, but it is always necessary to consider
lymph node enlargement in combination with the patient’s
history, clinical signs, laboratory ndings, and imaging
results. In some cases, the application of interventional techniques such as ultrasound-guided ne-needle aspiration
(USFNA) or ultrasound-guided core biopsy (USCB),
contrast- enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), or lymphadenectomy
with histology is required.
For a systematic evaluation of neck lymph nodes, it is recommended to begin the examination with plain B-mode
ultrasonography at least in two different planes, mostly in a
cross-sectional (axial, horizontal) and longitudinal (sagittal,
vertical) plane. With this information, qualitative parameters
such as homogeneity, presence or absence of a hilum, and
the echostructure of the lymph node can be estimated
(Table 5.1). As the next step, it is reasonable to switch to
qualitative parameters and then measure the two crosssectional/axial diameters and the longitudinal diameter. In a
large study of head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC),
it could be shown in a multivariate analysis that diameters
and derived values, e.g., volume and Steinkamp/Solbiati
index, are the most signicant parameters for detection of
malignant transformation (Table5.1) [1].
In addition, color-coded duplex and power Doppler
sonography or the administration of contrast media can assist
in further differential diagnosis (Tables 5.2 and 5.3) [2]. The
ultrasound (US) report should convey nodule size (in three
dimensions) and location (e.g., level IIA right) and a description of the nodule’s sonographic features, including composition (solid, cystic proportion, or spongiform), echogenicity,
Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this
chapter (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12641-4_5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
J. E. Meyer (*)
Department of ENT, Head, Neck, and Plastic Surgery,
Semmelweis University, Hamburg, Germany
e-mail: jens.meyer@asklepios.com
margins, presence and type of calcications, shape (if taller
than wide), and vascularity. The pattern of sonographic features associated with a nodule confers the risk of malignancy
and, combined with nodule size, guides FNA decision-making (Table5.3).
5.1 Dierential Diagnosis
5.1.1 Reactive Lymphadenopathy
Characteristics Oval, presence of hilum, normal cortex,
longitudinal diameter <15–18 mm, short cross-sectional
diameter <5–8 mm, Solbiati/Steinkamp’s L/S ratio <2,
absence of or hilar vascularization on color/Doppler mode,
rarely peripheral vascularization type, no other suspicious
signs.
Plain grayscale ultrasonography Reactive hyperplasia is a
common cause of cervical lymph node (CLN) enlargement
and by far the most frequent type of lymph node enlargement
that ultrasonography can visualize. The number of normal
CLNs varies considerably among individuals and decreases
with age. Although reactive CLNs tend to be smaller than
nodes of infectious or bacterial lymphadenitis and lymphoma
nodes, the size alone cannot be used as the single criterion in
the differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy [3,
4]. Especially in children, CLNs can reach diameters of
20mm or more (Fig.5.1), although less than 10mm in diam-
eter is considered to be normal in children younger than
12years, and small CLNs in the anterior neck levels are usually regarded as benign in children [5, 6]. In adults, generally
smaller diameters are thought to be reactive, whereas larger
diameters, especially if the CLN is round in shape, are interpreted as a malignant condition, although exact sizes vary
tremendously.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
H. J. Welkoborsky, P. Jecker (eds.), Ultrasonography of the Head and Neck, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12641-4_5
53

54
Thyroid carcinoma
lymph node
metastases Lymphoma nodes
HNSCC lymph
node
Malignant lymphadenopathy
metastases
LD <18mm
SD >8–10mm
No specic sizes
Increased short axis
SD >8–10mm
(L/S<2)
Round (L/S>2) Elliptical
(L/S>2)
Sharp Sharp
Sharp/unsharp
(extracapsular
spread)
Homogenous with
intranodal
reticulation
Hyperechoic tissue
looking like thyroid
Hyper-/
hypoechoic
In-/
Seldom, mostly
(micronodular
echopattern)
homogenous
after treatment
peripheral
microcalcications
Seldom unless
Common (cystic
pretreated or
advanced disease
areas)
(intranodal
necrosis)
J. E. Meyer
Suppurative/necrotizing
lymphadenopathy/
abscesses
Non-tuberculous
lymphadenopathy
No specic sizes 19mm>LD<44mm No specic sizes LD >18mm
Tuberculous
lymphadenopathy
Large
Infectious
mononucleosis
Not specic Round
(satellite-like CLNs)
Round (L/S>2) Round, but not specic
Round
longitudinal
(L/S>2)
diameters
Unsharp
(Nodal matting,
Irregular>sharp
(Nodal matting, soft
(Nodal matting, soft
Absent Absent Absent Present
clumping, perinodal
edema)
Absent (displaced hilar
tissue edema)
tissue edema)
vessels)
Absent (displaced hilar
vessels)
hilum
Hyper-/hypoechogenic
areas following a
salt-and-pepper pattern
Stage I marked decreases
of echogenicity
Stage II heterogeneous
Stage I/II hypoechoic
>Stage III hypoechoic
mass with
hypoechoic
Seldom Absent Punctate and
(lost echostructure,
inhomogeneous)
Multiple intranodal
echogenicity
heterogeneous
echogenicity
Obligate liquid areas Common
>Stage II intranodal
cystic necrosis (uctuant
calcications
characteristic of end-stage
infection
coarse, hyperechoic
spots created by
scattered calcications
or hyalinosis
appearance)
>Stage III (cold
abscesses), IV (collar
stud abscess), V (sinus
tract formation)
(abscess
formation)
Inammatory lymphadenopathy
Reactive
Sonographic
Disease
Table 5.1 Characteristics of different CLN diseases: plain grayscale US
SD <5–8mm
lymphadenopathy
Size LD <15–18mm
signs
(L/S<2)
Nodal borders Unsharp Sharp Irregular>sharp
Shape Elliptical
Present >5mm Hyperechoic
Echogenicity Hypoechoic Hyper-/
Echogenic
hilum
Absent Seldom
Calcications Absent Absent Single or multiple
Intranodal
liquefaction

5 Sonography ofLymph Nodes intheNeck
55
High vasculature
with mixed (hilar
and peripheral)
pattern
Thyroid
carcinoma lymph
node metastases Lymphoma nodes
Indeterminate:
increased central
vasculature
Suspicious:
peripheral or
diffusely
increased
HNSCC lymph
Malignant lymphadenopathy
node metastases
mixed vasculature
illustration of nodal
vasculature and
vasculature
Not specic Most accurate
Most accurate
illustration of nodal
vasculature and
additional
information on LN
parenchymal
perfusion
additional
information on LN
parenchymal
perfusion
Suppurative/
necrotizing
lymphadenopathy/
abscesses
Non-tuberculous
lymphadenopathy
Tuberculous
lymphadenopathy
Infectious
mononucleosis
High vasculature Peripheral or
depending on the rate
of growth and the
development of
necrotic areas
High vasculature Variable vascularity
Hilar vasculature
with symmetric
radial tree-like
vascular pattern
Low resistance
index (RI<0.6)
accumulation
Unknown Not specic Not specic Contrast media
Inammatory lymphadenopathy
Disease
Table 5.2 Characteristics of different CLN diseases: Doppler US and CEUS
Reactive
lymphadenopathy
Hilar vasculature or
avascular
Sonographic
signs
Doppler
sonographic
vascular
pattern
Most accurate
illustration of nodal
vasculature and
additional information
on LN parenchymal
perfusion
Contrast-
enhancement
US

56
Malignant lymphadenopathy
Lymphoma
nodes
Thyroid
carcinoma lymph
node metastases
HNSCC lymph
node metastases
Suppurative/
necrotizing
lymphadenopathy/
abscesses
Uncommon Uncommon
Perinodal edema
through
extracapsular
spread and after
previous radiation
therapy
Fusion
Huge conglomerates
Nodal matting or
clumping
Perinodal edema
High
sensitivity,
specicity,
and accuracy
High sensitivity,
specicity, and
accuracy
Measurement of
thyroglobulin in
needle washouts
High sensitivity,
specicity, and
accuracy
Stages correctly
neck nodes in 93%
of patients with
helpful for antibiotic
resistance testing
J. E. Meyer
HNSCC
Non-tuberculous
lymphadenopathy
Involved CLN levels
submandibular, preauricular
and rarely parotid
Mainly unilateral
Development of satellite-
like nodules
Nodal matting and adjacent
soft tissue edema
Livid discoloration and
thinned out, shiny
Tuberculous lymph
adenopathy
Nodal matting and
adjacent soft tissue
edema
Echogenic thin layer
Lymph node
packages
“Malignant
appearance”
Can mimic all other
lymphadenopathies
Infectious
mononucleosis
matting or
clumping
Inammatory lymphadenopathy
Disease
Table 5.3 Characteristics of different CLN diseases: supplemental characteristics
Reactive
lymphadenopathy
Absent Commonly
Sonographic
signs
Supplemental
characteristics
appearance (“parchment-
like”) of overlying skin
Lymphocutaneous stulas/
draining wound (sinus-like,
echogenic intrinsic reexes
with and without acoustic
shadows)
Unknown Unknown Aspiration of pus
Laboratory
diagnostics
Soft Unknown Stiff (induration) Unknown Variable stiffness Stiff Stiff Soft
High sensitivity,
specicity, and
US
elastography
US-guided
FNAC/CBC
accuracy
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
