Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3597_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
87 Мб
Скачать
212 4
https://t.me/med1917
200 mm Hg
Figure 4-28 Simultaneous hemodynamic tracings of aortic (Ao) and left
ventricular (LV) pressures in a patient with a pacemaker. Loss of atrial contraction (paced beats between arrows) decreases ventricular filling with loss of systemic pressure. Lef t arrow, Initiation of ventricular pacing with loss of the atrial contribution to LV filling; right arrow, return of atrial syn­chrony and normal sinus rhy thm. Systemic pressures are increased mark­edly during normal sinus rhy thm. ECG, Electrocardiogram.
Hemodynamic Data
ECG
Ao
LV
0
ECG
40 mm Hg
#1 #2
V
1
v
a
a
0
Figure 4-29 Simultaneous pulmonary capillary wedge (PCW) and left ven-
tricular (LV) pressures in a patient who has loss of atrial activity (beat 2). On beat 1, the a wave is evident on LV (a) and pulmonar y capillar y wedge pressure (PCWP) (a). The a wave is lost on beat 2, with no atrial activity. The a wave is considerably higher because of its contraction against the closed mitral valve. ECG, Electrocardiogram.
a
gradually returns as atrial activity becomes more connected to the QRS.
Large v Waves on Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Tracing
LV and PCW pressures generally match well in diastole (Fig. 4-29). The PCW a wave (a wave is large. There is no important diastolic PCW-LV gradient. On beat 2, because of late atrial activity, loss of the LV a wave is shown by the different initial upstroke of the LV pressures. The PCW has large and late a and v waves. The v wave on a PCWP tracing may be associ­ated with significant mitral regurgitation but is neither highly sensitive nor specific for mitral regurgitation. Large v waves may also be present with a ventricular septal defect or any condition in which the LA volume (e.g., ventricular septal defect) or LA pressure relationship (stiffness or compliance) is increased (e.g., rheumatic heart disease, postcardiac surgery, and infiltrative heart diseases). Mitral valve obstruction from any cause and congestive heart failure (CHF) in the absence of mitral regurgitation are also associated with large v waves. Giant v waves, also seen in Figure 4-30, may be large enough to be
) follows the LV a wave by 150 msec (beat 1). The v
https://t.me/med1917
4
Hemodynamic Data 213
ECG
v
a
*
PCW
(0–40 mm Hg)
Figure 4-30 Giant v waves on the pulmonary capillary wedge (PCW) tracing
can be transmit ted to pulmonary artery (PA) pressure, producing a notch (*) on the PA downslope. ECG, Electrocardiogram.
transmitted to the PA pressure, which causes a notch on the diastolic downslope.
Aortic Stenosis
The effect of increasing LV filling by a premature ventricular contrac­tion (PVC) on simultaneous LV and Ao pressure tracings in a patient with minimal Ao stenosis can be seen with the higher LV pressure after an extrasystolic beat, called postextrasystolic potentiation (Fig. 4-31).
The atrial contraction is important in patients with Ao stenosis (Fig. 4-32). Simultaneous Ao and LV pressure (trans-septal approach) shows that atrial activity is absent on the first beat, a junctional beat (*). Without the atrial contribution, Ao systolic pressure is 132 mm Hg, and LV systolic pressure is 190 mm Hg. On the following beat, number 3 atrial activity (P wave) precedes the QRS, and the Ao pressure increases to 160 mm Hg; LV pressure increases to 225 mm Hg, repre­senting an approximately 25% increase in pressure augmentation. This effect is crucial in patients with poor LV function. Two additional features of this tracing are worthy of note. The a wave on the LV pres­sure tracing (see Fig. 4-31, A and B, arrow) can be seen on LV beat 2, and Ao regurgitation may be present when a wide pulse pressure (Ao systolic-diastolic pressure) of > pressure has decreased to <50 mm Hg at the end of diastole. Recall that the least accurate method to measure an LV-Ao gradient is with a single catheter pull back (see Fig. 4-31, C)
50 to 60 mm Hg is observed. The Ao
PA
(0–100 mm Hg)
Left Ventricular Gradient Below the Aortic Valve
Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is a condition in which thick heart muscle, especially inside the LV chamber, contracts so hard that it obstructs flow out of the ventricle and produces a pres­sure gradient inside the LV with a normal Ao valve. Figure 4-33 depicts simultaneous LV and Ao pressure showing a large Ao-LV gradient (LV pressure, 220 mm Hg; Ao pressure, 120 mm Hg). On pull back of the LV catheter (end-hole multipurpose) from the distal LV to a position just beneath the Ao valve, the Ao-LV gradient disappears (see the LV pressure matching with Ao pressure in Fig. 4-33, far right.)
A PVC in a patient with HOCM produces a longer LV filling period after the PVC beat. This increases both LV volume and contractility
214 4
https://t.me/med1917
ECG
200 mm Hg
A
Ao
Hemodynamic Data
1 sec
113/47 (68)
LV
1
32
MONITOR
BPM
Ao
LV
147/-8,
r
r
I
(50)
II
(50)
200
s
LV
LV
s
s
s
100
Ao
Ao
0
B
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
13
0
2
12:10:57 PM
C
Figure 4-31
d
d
e
BPM
91/49 31 9
139
31
P1:AO 1000 PM
138
13
1
139
100
3072
33
30
0
12:10:59 PM 12:11:01 PM 12:11:03 PM 12:11:05 PM
d
e
A, Postextrasystolic accentuation of lef t ventricular (LV) and
IPM
d
116
112
38
36
aortic (Ao) pressures (closed arrow) after a premature ventricular contraction (PVC) (open arrow). This patient does not have Ao stenosis. The PVC does not generate pressure sufficient to open the Ao valve and results in a dropped beat when the peripheral pulse rate is counted. B, Postextrasystolic potentiation hemodynamics in a patient with mild aortic stenosis (AS). C, LV to aorta pressure pull back with a single catheter, demonstrating dif­ficulty in assessing a transvalvular gradient. (A, From Kern MJ, Donohue T, Bach R, et al: Interpretation of cardiac pathophysiology from pressure wave ­form analysis: cardiac arrhythmias. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 27:223–227,
1992.)
P
https://t.me/med1917
4
Hemodynamic Data 215
ECG
200 mm Hg
Ao
LV
0
Figure 4-32 Simultaneous lef t ventricular (LV) (obtained with trans-septal
technique) and aortic (Ao) pressures from fluid-filled catheter systems. Note the contribution of atrial contraction (arrow) to the change in LV and systemic pressures on beat 2. *, Absence of P wave on this tracing; P, P wave. The wide pulse pressure is also indicative of Ao insufficiency.
*
1
2
Figure 4 -33 Simultaneous left ventricular (LV) and aortic (Ao) pressures
in a patient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) during pull back of the catheter from the distal portion of the LV. The pressure gradient between the aorta and LV is lost. LV systolic pressure matches Ao pressure during catheter pull back before the catheter is pulled out of the LV. There is no true Ao valve gradient. This LV-Ao gradient is located in the mid-LV wall beneath the Ao valve. Matching of Ao and LV systolic pressures in the proximal chamber (arrow indicates transition from distal LV to proximal LV under the aortic valve). See text for details.
with greater intraventricular muscular obstruction, resulting in three characteristic changes in post-PVC pressure waveforms: (1) The LV-Ao gradient is greater, (2) Ao pulse pressure is narrower, and (3) Ao waveform if deformed shows a spike and dome pattern characteristic of early LV outflow obstruction. In addition, the Ao pressure upslope is very rapid and parallels the LV pressure upstroke. These post-PVC changes occur due to the increase in contractility, which outweighs the effects of the increase in preload and leads to worse outflow tract obstruction. Post-PVC findings in AS include a larger LV-Ao gradi­ent but, unlike HOCM, they also include an increase in Ao pulse pressure, with preservation of the Ao waveform including the delayed Ao upstroke (Fig. 4-34). Table 4-4 lists provocative maneuvers to increase an outflow tract gradient in patients with hypertrophic car­diomyopathy (HCM).
216 4
https://t.me/med1917
Hemodynamic Data
II
aV
L
LV (200) ART (200)
ART
LV
Figure 4 -34 Comparison of post-premature ventricular contraction (PVC)
hemodynamics in patients with aortic stenosis (AS, lef t) and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM, right). Post- PVC in AS has a larger gradi­ent, slow upstroke, larger pulse pressure, and preser ved aortic (Ao) wave ­form. In contrast, post-PVC HOCM tracings show a larger gradient, smaller pulse pressure, vertical Ao pressure upstroke, and spike- and- dome pattern of Ao pressure. LV, Lef t ventricle.
Table 4 -4
AS
400
HOCM
200
0
Provocative Tests for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy*
Drug or Maneuver Mechanism Increasing Ao -LV Gradient
Drugs
Dobutamine Increased myocardial contractility Isoproterenol (not commonly
used today)
Amyl nitrite Decreased systemic arterial pressure
Nitroglycerin Decreased venous return, decreased
Maneuver s
Extrasystole (PVC)* Postextrasystolic increase in myocardial
Valsalva maneuver Decreased venous return, decreased LV
Ao, Aortic; CO, cardiac output; LV, left ventricular; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; PVC, p rematur e ventricular cont raction.
*Stroke volume and systemic ar terial pulse pressure decrease in the postex trasys tolic beat (t he Brockenbrough-Braunwald-Morrow ef fect).
Increased myocardial contractility,
decreased blood pressure
(peripheral vasodilatation), reflex increasing sy mpathetic tone, decreased venous return, and increased myocardial contractility
CO, and increased narrowing of LVOT
contractilit y and decreased pulse pressure
volume, and increased narrowing of outflow tract
Aortic Regurgitation
The characteristic hemodynamic feature of Ao regurgitation is wide pulse pressure, brisk Ao (femoral) pressure upstroke, and rapid filling of LV diastolic pressure. Often there is marked overshoot of the FA pressure. Figures 4-35, 4-36, and 4-37 illustrate simultaneous Ao and LV pressures in several patients with different degrees of Ao regurgita­tion. In Figure 4-36 the large and prominent a wave shows the effect of first-degree AV block (long P–R interval, arrows) on the LV pressure.
Figure 4-37 diagrams the physiology of the Ao-LV gradient in diastole.
No atrial contribution of LV pressure is present.
https://t.me/med1917
200 mm Hg
ECG
Ao
LV
4
Hemodynamic Data 217
1 sec
Figure 4- 35
Hemodynamic tracing in a patient with aortic (Ao) insufficiency (and minimal aortic stenosis [AS]), showing the Ao-lef t ventricular (LV) dia ­stolic gradient (arrows) that are important for coronary perfusion. (Note the loss of the a wave due to paced rhythm.) ECG, Electrocardiogram.
ECG
200 mm Hg
Ao
LV
Figure 4 -36 Simultaneous aortic (Ao) and left ventricular (LV) pressures
in a patient with Ao insuf ficiency. Note the absence of a systolic pressure gradient. The time delay in the Ao pressure upstroke indicates that femoral sheath pressure is used. The presence of a large and early a wave (thick bottom arrow) occurs with P–R interval prolongation (top thick arrow). ECG, Electrocardiogram.
ECG
200 mm Hg
Ao
LV
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 1 23 4 5 6
Figure 4 -37 Severe aortic (Ao) regurgitation shown by rapidly increasing
left ventricular (LV) diastolic pressure (lowest closed arrow) and end-diastolic equilibration of Ao and LV pressure (three small arrows). Peripheral ar terial pressure overshoot or amplification is caused by forceful LV ejection and compliant arterial system. (In this case, Ao pressure was matched with femoral ar terial [FA] sheath pressure.) ECG, Electrocardiogram. (From Kern MJ, Aguirre FV: Interpretation of cardiac pathophysiology from pressure waveform analysis: aor tic regurgitation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 26:232– 240, 1992.)
200 200
100
0 0
100
218 4
https://t.me/med1917
200 mm Hg
Hemodynamic Data
ECG
Ao
0
Figure 4- 38 Hemodynamic tracings in a patient with mitral regurgitation,
characterized by a giant v wave in left atrial (LA) pressure. This v wave cor­responds to marked increase in flow and volume into the L A. Ao, Aortic pressure; ECG, electrocardiogram; LV, left ventricular pressure.
V
LV
LA
Hemodynamically severe Ao regurgitation is indicated by rapidly increasing LV diastolic pressure and wide Ao pressure with near equili­bration of Ao and LV pressure at end diastole (Figs. 4-36 and 4-37).
Mitral Regurgitation
In mitral regurgitation (Fig. 4-38), large v waves in the PCW tracing represent LV volume transmitted backward through an incompe­tent mitral valve. The LA v wave occurs on the downstroke of LV pressure.
Figure 4-39 shows large v waves with a persistent LV-PCW gradient
in patients with mixed mitral regurgitation and stenosis. Left ventricu­lography confirms significant mitral regurgitation. The slope of the v waves in mitral regurgitation and stenosis is flatter than that in which large v waves are associated with isolated mitral regurgitant flow alone.
Mitral Stenosis
In mitral stenosis (see Fig. 4-39), LV and PCW pressures show the diastolic pressure gradient, indicating the severity of LA outflow obstruction. The a wave on beat 1 is associated with a normal v wave. On the following beat, atrial activity is delayed and follows the QRS, contributing to a giant v wave (36 mm Hg). The augmented filling increases the mitral valve gradient, which is influenced by HR. When the rhythm is irregular (as in AF), calculations of gradients should be made from the average of 10 beats. Figure 4-40 illustrates the effect of R–R cycle length on the mitral stenosis gradient. In some patients with mitral stenosis, balloon catheter valvuloplasty may be used to open a narrowed mitral orifice.
Constrictive Pericarditis
Constrictive pericarditis limits filling of the heart by the confining pericardium. The RV fills at the expense of the LV, with the septum pushing into the LV during RV filling (e.g., inspiration). Typical hemo­dynamic findings include Kussmaul sign (an inspiratory increase in RA pressure), an elevated RA pressure with an M or W configuration, and a dip and plateau pattern of early rapid diastolic filling, with abrupt cessation of further caused by pericardial constraint (Fig. 4-41). Discordance of LV/RV systolic pressures during respiration is the most specific hemodynamic finding, establishing a diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis.
https://t.me/med1917
LV
LA
grad
4
Hemodynamic Data 219
A
v
a
e
d
v
a
e
d
v
a
e
d
v
a
e
d
B
Figure 4-39 A, Simultaneous lef t ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) pres-
sures (0- to 40-mm Hg scale) show distinct a and v waves with a large diastolic gradient of mitral stenosis. B, LV and LA pressures with large v waves demonstrate mixed mitral stenosis and regurgitation.
In Figure 4-42, matching of elevated diastolic pressures with an early dip followed by a plateau during diastole (on the first beat) is the characteristic pattern. Often, the classic dip-and-plateau configuration appears only during slow HRs. Tachycardia and respiratory effort obscure the pattern, but matching of RV and LV pressures during diastole is consistent. The most specific and sensitive sign that can differentiate constrictive from restrictive physiology is the dynamic respiratory variations in RV and LV systolic pressures. RV/LV systolic pressures that increase and decrease in a concordant manner are findings of restrictive cardiomyopathy, whereas discordant responses during respiration of the RV/LV systolic pressures are the hallmark of constrictive physiology (Fig. 4-43). RA pressure shown in Figure 4-44 demonstrates the characteristic pattern of prominent “y” descent with a classic M or W configuration of constrictive physiology. These wave­forms are the altered x and y troughs resulting from impaired ventricu­lar filling. Myocardial restrictive heart disease or heart failure also shows this pattern occasionally.
220 4
https://t.me/med1917
40 mm Hg
Hemodynamic Data
1 sec
ECG
LA
LV
A
1 sec
ECG
40 mm Hg
LA
LV
B
Figure 4-40 Influence of heart rate (HR; diastolic period) on mitral valve
gradient. The mitral stenosis gradient changes with heart rate (R–R inter val). A, A short R–R interval is associated with a gradient (shaded area) of 22 mm Hg. B, A long R–R inter val has a mean gradient of 29 mm Hg. When computing mean valve area in atrial fibrillation (AF), average is 10 beats. ECG, Electrocardiogram; LA, left atrial pressure; LV, left ventricular pressure. (From Kern MJ, Aguirre F: Interpretation of cardiac pathophysiology from pressure waveform analysis: mitral valve gradients: Par t I. Cathet Cardio­vasc Diagn 26:308–315, 1992.)
1 sec
ECG
40 mm Hg
0
Figure 4- 41 Right atrial (RA) pressure showing pattern of constrictive
physiology with large “y” descent and smaller “x” descent. Mean RA pres­sure is 20 mm Hg. ECG, Electrocardiogram.
x
y
Hemodynamics of Tamponade
In contrast to constrictive physiology waveforms, observe the RA pres­sure in a patient with cardiac tamponade (Fig. 4-45). High pericardial pressure blunts all diastolic filling waveforms. Tamponade physiol­ogy has an elevated RA pressure with blunted “y” descents, reflecting impairment in early diastolic filling and the life-threatening nature of this disorder. The arterial pressure shows pulsus paradoxus (an
https://t.me/med1917
ECG
LV
4
Hemodynamic Data 221
50
25
RV
0
Figure 4-42
pressure tracing in a patient with constrictive pericarditis. Matching of dia­stolic pressures is one of the hallmarks of this condition. However, dynamic respiratory variation of systolic pressures is diagnostic in differentiating constriction from restrictive cardiomyopathy. ECG, Electrocardiogram.
Simultaneous left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV)
50
25
0
RV vs. LV
Figure 4- 43 Dynamic respirator y variation in constrictive and restrictive
physiology. Normal respiratory activity results in a parallel decrease in right ventricular (RV)/left ventricular (LV) systolic pressures. Left, RV/LV systolic pressures move together with respiration in a concordant manner, a finding highly consistent with restrictive cardiomyopathy. Right, RV/LV systolic pressures move discordantly during respiration, a finding highly specific for constrictive physiology and constrictive pericardial disease.
ECG
40 mm Hg
Paced
RA
Figure 4-44 Right atrial (RA) pressure in a patient with constrictive peri-
carditis showing abnormally elevated pressure with a classic M configura­tion. The elevated pressure with exaggerated “y” descent is also seen in cardiomyopathy. ECG, Electrocardiogram.
a V