Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_538_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
86 Мб
Скачать
Enteric Nervous System
h
LM - Longitudinal muscle MP CM SMP NP NE SP 5-HT AC NO NP
2 Colonic Physiology
35
Colonic Innervation
The gastrointestinal tract is densely innervated to provide information on its luminal contents, processes regulating digestion and absorption, and potential threats [20].
The enteric nervous system is the largest single division of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), containing between 200 and 600 million enteric neurons throughout the GI tract [21]. The colon and rectum are innervated by nerves of both extrinsic and intrinsic origin. The extrinsic pathways origi­nate from the central and autonomic (sympathetic and para­sympathetic) nervous systems. Autonomic pathways run along parasympathetic and sympathetic chains. Each of these pathways include afferent (sensory) and efferent (motor) innervation. The intrinsic innervation consists of the enteric nervous system. Two major sets of ganglia are found in the colon. The myenteric or Auerbach’s plexus is located between the longitudinal and circular smooth muscle layers and plays a crucial role in colonic smooth muscle function. The submucosal or Meissner’s plexus regulates ion trans­port. The extreme importance of these two plexuses is clear in children with Hirschsprung’s disease in which the ganglia of the myenteric and submucosal plexuses are congenitally absent. The aganglionic segments do not relax and peristalsis is disturbed resulting in severe constipation [22].
Extrinsic innervation to the large intestine comes from both parasympathetic and sympathetic branches of the ANS.Colonic motility is modulated by sympathetic neurons in prevertebral ganglia, which has potent effects on colonic
function (Fig.2.5). The proximal regions of the large intes­tine are sympathetically innervated by bers that originate from the superior mesenteric ganglion. More distal regions receive input from the inferior mesenteric ganglion. There is evidence for ongoing tonic inhibition of colonic secretion, since disrupting the pathway causes a substantial increase in secretion. This is largely mediated by a strong inhibitory drive to secretomotor neurons in submucosal ganglia, via α-2-adrenergic receptors [23]. Sympathetic activation also directly contracts sphincters via indirect effects (i.e., by reducing acetylcholine release from cholinergic neurons) and inhibits activation of enteric neurons. Both actions delay GI and colonic transit. The distal rectum and anal canal are innervated by sympathetic bers from the hypogastric plexus.
There are two pathways of parasympathetic innervation. The cecum and the ascending and transverse portions of the colon are innervated by the vagus nerve, whereas the descending and sigmoid areas of the colon and the rectum are innervated by pelvic nerves from the sacral region of the spinal cord. The pelvic nerves enter the colon near the recto­sigmoid junction and project orally and aborally within the plane of the myenteric plexus. The vagus and pelvic nerves consist primarily of preganglionic efferent bers and many afferent bers. The efferent bers synapse with the nerve cell bodies of the myenteric and other intrinsic plexuses. The external anal sphincter, a striated muscle, is innervated by the somatic pudendal nerves. Sacral parasympathetic path­ways to the colon primarily synapse onto myenteric neurons.
- Myenteric plexus
- Circular muscle
- Submucosal plexus
- Nerve plexus
- Nerve endings
- Substance P
- 5-hydorxytryptamine
h - Acetylcholine
- Nitric oxide
- Neuropeptide Y
Fig. 2.5 Schematic representation of the components of the enteric nervous system. (Courtesy of Robin Noel, used with permission)
LM
MP
CM
SMP
Serosa
Sensory
Fibers
NP
NP
Sympathetic
Postgangllonic
Fibers
SP
NP
5-HT
5-HT
NE
ACh
Parasympathetic
Postgangllonic
Fibers
NO
ACh
NE
ACh
NP
AC
36
G. T. Ault and J. S. Beaty
Excitatory pathways are important for colonic propulsive activity, especially during defecation; damage to these path­ways can cause severe constipation [24].
As in other regions of the gut, several diverse chemicals serve as mediators at presynaptic and postsynaptic junctions within the autonomic innervation to the large intestine. Acetylcholine (ACh) and tachykinins such as substance P serve as major excitatory mediators, and nitric oxide (NO), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and possibly adenosine triphosphate (ATP) serve as major inhibitory mediators. Transmission between the pudendal nerves and the external anal sphincter is mediated by ACh [10].
Pain
The sensation of pain appears to be mediated by different afferents depending on the location of the GI tract undergo­ing the noxious stimulus. Pain from the rectum primarily involves pelvic pathways. Inammation (or inammatory mediators) can change both the response properties of spe­cic classes of sensory neurons and the involvement of spe­cic ascending pathways, which is relevant in post-inammatory hypersensitivity and postinfectious irrita­ble bowel syndrome (IBS) [25].
Visceral sensory neurons activate reex pathways that control gut function and give rise to important sensation, such as fullness, bloating, nausea, discomfort, urgency, and pain. Sensory neurons are organized into three central nervous system pathways: vagal, thoracolumbar, and lum­bosacral [22]. Experimental distension of the descending or sigmoid colon is perceived as a sensation of cramping, gas, or pressure in the lower abdomen, lower back, or perineum [26].
Both central and peripheral mechanisms have been sug­gested to be involved in the development of pain symptoms. Several studies have provided evidence that IBS is associated with a dysregulation of the brain-gut axis, with peripheral sensory alterations dominating in some patients and dis­turbed central processing dominating in others [27]. It is now widely accepted that an altered visceral sensitivity through abnormal endogenous pain processing plays an important role in the pathogenesis of IBS [28]. IBS is associated with decreased epithelial expression of the serotonin-selective reuptake transporter (SERT) in many studies; however, it is unknown if the disturbance is responsible for the symptoms of IBS [29].
Colonic Motility
The motor function of the colon includes propulsion, accom­modation, and rapid emptying of a variable portion of the
colon during defecation. In addition, the colon must be able to store fecal material until socially acceptable to eliminate. Colonic motility is mediated by the enteric nervous system in association with autonomic parasympathetic and sympa­thetic input and with input from the extrinsic nervous sys­tem. Colonic motility is characterized by patterns of contraction of longitudinal and circular muscle layers with elimination of feces. Motility is integrated with colonic secretion and absorption. Propulsion is achieved by numer­ous motor events including individual contractions, contrac­tile bursts, high-amplitude propagated contractions (HAPCs), and possibly changes in tone [22]. Accommodation, storage, and distribution of material within the colon are mediated by colonic tone. Tone and phasic activity in the colon show considerable diurnal varia­tion, increasing slowly after a meal, reducing during sleep, and increasing dramatically upon waking [30]. HAPCs occur more frequently during the morning, during the post­prandial period, and preceding defecation [3032]. The colonic motor response to eating consists of an increase in phasic and tonic contractile activity that begins within sev­eral minutes of ingestion of a meal and continues for a period of up to 3hours. This response is inuenced by both the caloric content and composition of the meal with fat and carbohydrate stimulating colonic motor activity, while amino acids and protein inhibit motor activity [30].
A more prolonged state of contraction, referred to as tone, is not regulated by slow waves and may be recognized clearly in the colon (response to feeding), as well as in some sphinc­teric regions. Tone is regulated by actin-myosin interaction mediated by cellular mechanisms that are modulated by neu­rogenic and mechanical stimuli. Phasic contractions, such as those regulating lumen occlusion, may be superimposed on tonic activity. Thus, tone can increase the efciency of pha­sic contractions by diminishing the diameter of the lumen. Tone also modies wall tension in response to gut lling and is therefore one determinant of perception of distension.
This motor input interacts with myogenic mechanisms to create regional patterns of contraction and relaxation which mix and propel content. It is likely that regular contractile bursts – colonic motor complexes – do occur, each burst occurring once or twice per hour and lasting approximately 6minutes [22]. Periodic or cyclic motor activity is evident more clearly in the rectum, the so-called rectal motor com­plexes. They do not appear to be synchronized with the small intestinal motor migrating complexes, and their precise func­tion and regulation remain unclear [22].
The anorectum functions in defecation and continence. Defecation is achieved through the integration of a series of motor events and involves both striated and smooth muscle. A sensation of rectal fullness is generated by rectal afferents when colonic contents reach the rectum. Rectal lling also induces the rectoanal inhibitory or rectosphincteric reex
2 Colonic Physiology
37
that leads to internal anal sphincter relaxation and external sphincter contractions. At this stage, the individual can decide to postpone or proceed with defecation. To facilitate defecation, the puborectalis muscle and external anal sphinc­ter relax, thereby straightening the rectoanal angle and open­ing the anal canal. The propulsive force enabling defecation is generated by contractions of the rectosigmoid, diaphragm, and the muscles of the abdominal wall to propel the rectal contents through the open sphincter. The internal anal sphincter is a continuation of the smooth muscle of the rec­tum, is under sympathetic control, and provides approxi­mately 80% of normal resting anal tone. The external anal sphincter and pelvic oor muscles are striated muscles inner­vated by sacral roots and the pudendal nerve.
Modulators ofColonic Motility
Muscarinic agonists (i.e., hyoscamine) and cholinesterase inhibitors (i.e., neostigmine) increase colonic motility. The α-2 adrenergic antagonist yohimbine also increases colonic motility and promotes uid and electrolyte absorption, while the α-2 agonist clonidine reduces motility. Clonidine reduces colonic tone and phasic pressure activity, as well as the colonic perception of distention which can increase colonic compliance. Clonidine can be used to treat diarrhea predomi­nant IBS.
Serotonin 5-HT receptors (5-HT3) antagonists such as alosetron increase colonic compliance, reduce postprandial rectal motor activity, improve stool consistency, delay colon transit, and reduce rectal sensitivity in IBS. Alosetron was approved for IBS-diarrhea predominant in women [33]. A systematic review of published clinical trials through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System documented the risk of ischemic colitis was higher with alosetron than placebo (0.15% vs. 0.0%) [34], and it was subsequently withdrawn from the market.
A newer high selectivity afnity 5-HT4 receptor agonist, prucalopride, has been approved by the FDA.Extensive car­diovascular assessment suggests it does not affect the Q-T interval. For chronic constipation patients, prucalopride can be used to accelerate intestinal and colonic transit [35, 36].
The GI tract contains three opioid receptors (δ, μ, κ), with the gastrointestinal effects mediated primarily by μ recep­tors. Opioids reduce neuronal excitability and release of neu­rotransmitters. Morphine increases colonic phasic segmental activity, reduces fasting colonic tone, and attenuates the gas­trocolonic response. Opioids also increase uid absorption partly by delaying transit and increasing mucosal contact time. Opioid-induced constipation or opioid bowel dysfunc­tion is common, affecting 41–81% of patients treated with opioids [18].
Lubiprostone is a synthetic bicyclic fatty acid derived from prostaglandin E1 that activates apical CIC-2 chloride channels. Lubiprostone also activates prostaglandin EP receptors and the apical cystic brosis transmembrane regu­lator (CFTR), causing intestinal uid secretion [37]. These secretory effects likely explain why lubiprostone accelerates small intestinal and colonic transit in healthy subjects. Lubiprostone does not affect colonic motor activity in healthy individuals [38] but is approved by the FDA for treating chronic constipation and female constipation pre­dominant IBS [18, 39].
Bile acids infused directly into the human sigmoid and rectum at concentrations of 5 mmol/L stimulated colonic phasic contractions; however, such concentrations are sel­dom achieved in the colon unless there has been an ileal resection. Rectal infusion of chenodeoxycholic acid at physi­ological concentrations stimulates proximal colonic propa­gated contractions and increases rectal sensitivity. Hence, chenodeoxycholic acid accelerates colonic transit in healthy subjects. These effects have pathophysiological and thera­peutic consequences. When enterohepatic circulation of bile acids is disrupted by ileal disease (e.g., Crohn’s disease, sur­gical resection, or radiation ileitis) or idiopathic mechanisms (idiopathic bile-acid malabsorption), bile acids spill into the colon, causing diarrhea. Idiopathic bile-acid malabsorption may explain diarrhea in some patients with IBS.From a ther­apeutic perspective, delayed-release chenodeoxycholic acid, results in accelerated colonic transit and improved bowel function in females with constipation-predominant IBS [18].
Laxatives work either via osmotic effects (e.g., polyethyl­ene glycol-based solutions, magnesium citrate-based prod­ucts, sodium phosphate-based products, and nonabsorbable carbohydrates [lactulose, sorbitol]) or by stimulating colonic propulsive activity [18]. Osmotic agents, which are hyper­tonic, pull uid into the intestinal lumen, causing diarrhea.
Stimulant laxatives (e.g., bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate, and glycerol) stimulate HAPC wave sequences, thereby leading to mass movements; bisacodyl and sodium picosul­fate also have anti-absorptive plus secretory effects [18, 40,
41]. Bisacodyl exerts its motor effect through mucosal affer-
ent nerve bers, because the response can be blocked by topical mucosal application of lidocaine [18].
While sacral nerve stimulation is approved by the FDA to treat fecal incontinence, its role for treating constipation is unclear [42]. Sacral nerve stimulation modulates the extrin­sic nerves innervating the pelvic oor and colon. In addi­tion, stimulation of the S3 root also induces propulsive activity throughout the entire colon and has been shown to increase stool frequency in patients with slow transit consti­pation [43]. In Kamm’s study, colonic transit was assessed in 27 of 45 patients with medically refractory chronic con­stipation who proceeded to permanent sacral nerve stimula-
38
G. T. Ault and J. S. Beaty
tion [42]. Of these 27 patients, 20 had delayed colonic transit before but only 9 had delayed transit after sacral nerve stimulation.
Microbiome
A normally functioning GI tract has healthy, well-established colonizing microbiota in its mucosa and lumen, which are major contributors to the maintenance of whole-body homeostasis. It is well established that the species composi­tion and relative abundance of the gut microbiota are impacted by the diet, lifestyle, and overall health of an indi­vidual. Humans have developed a commensalistic relation­ship with the gut microbiome. Over time, this relationship has evolved to become a mutual and interdependent one, in which the physiologic activity of the microbiota has a sig­nicant impact on the host and the activity of the host impacts the genera comprising the microbiota. In support of life, gut microbial metabolism supplies the host with short-chain fatty acids and essential vitamins (vitamins B and K) and contributes to the synthesis and absorption of essential amino acids.
The adult human intestine contains approximately 110 trillion bacteria. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis detected more than 700 volatile organic compounds from human feces [44]. Our microbiota is established in the period after birth and although it can be modulated by fac­tors, such as diet, illness, and antibiotic treatment, is rela­tively resistant to change in later life. The microbial composition changes along the length of the gut, in response to changes in the luminal environment including presence of nutrients, acidity, and oxygen content. Microbial diversity has been used as an index of a “healthy” microbiota, but this is probably a simplistic notion as some benecial plant foods will decrease diversity yet produce a benecial host response. There is considerable variability that likely depends predom­inantly on diet and lifestyle [45].
The role the human microbiome plays in health and dis­ease is actively under investigation. The composition of feces is altered in diseases such as IBS [46], IBD, colorectal can­cer [47], and autism [48], implicating that the pathogenesis of these diseases is associated with dysbiosis. Several studies demonstrate alterations in the fecal and colonic mucosal microbiome in constipation and diarrhea. Absent interven­tional trials, it is unclear whether these associations reect cause and effect. However, even after adjusting for demo­graphic features, diet, and colonic transit, the microbiome discriminated between health and constipation with an accu­racy of 92% [18].
Patients with IBD have altered microbiota, and they may have changes in their gut microbiota that precede a diagno­sis. IBD is thought to be an aberrant immune response to
luminal content including the microbiota. A shift in the deli­cate balance (dysbiosis) of “good” bacteria and “bad” pro­inammatory bacteria may be important for the development and maintenance of IBD.For example, Roseburia spp. are decreased in those already diagnosed with IBD, and as such, the manipulation of the microbiota using antibiotics, probiot­ics, and prebiotics might be useful in treating IBD [49, 50]. Crohn’s disease (CD) is associated with lower overall micro­bial diversity when compared to healthy controls. The abun­dance of both the Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes was signicantly higher in CD when compared to healthy con­trols and those with ulcerative colitis (UC). Low numbers and the absence of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a common member of the healthy gut microbial community, have been associated with UC.Antibiotics have been used to treat IBD with the goal of decreasing concentrations of bacteria in the lumen and altering the community composition.
These observations and many others have been the moti­vating force for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Human Microbiome Project (NIH HMP) [51]. The NIH HMP is a roadmap for biomedical research and has three main goals: (1) utilize new high-throughput screening tech­nology to characterize the microbiome more completely by studying multiple body sites from 250 “normal” individuals; (2) determine if there are associations between changes in the microbiome and health and disease; and (3) standardize data resources and new technologies for the wider scientic community [52, 53]. Phase II of this project has begun, and it aims to examine changes in three microbiome-associated conditions: (1) preterm birth, (2) IBD, and (3) type 2 diabe­tes [5457].
The indigenous human microbiome is dominated by two bacterial phyla: Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. In many stud- ies, the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes account for greater than 98% of the bacteria present in the human gut. It has long been appreciated that different classes of antibiotics affect the human gut microbial community, both targeted and off­target [58, 59]. The use of antibiotics can open niches that were otherwise occupied and allow for new species (good or bad) to take up residency [60].
For example, changes in human gut microbiome commu­nity structure after exposure to the uoroquinolone antibi­otic, ciprooxacin, have shown that much of the community is altered [61]. Dethlefsen etal. reported that all aspects of the gut microbiome community, that is, diversity, richness, and evenness, were decreased and the abundance of approxi­mately one-third of the species present was changed [61]. The loss of diversity may cause acute human disease by impacting the role of the microbiome on nutrition, metabo­lism, and pathogen resistance. After antibiotic treatment was stopped, many of the communities rebounded and closely resembled the original community. In some cases, it took nearly 6 months for the microbiome to rebound. It has been
2 Colonic Physiology
39
suggested that broad-spectrum antibiotics, especially those with activity against anaerobes, might cause longer-lasting changes in the gut microbial community [62].

Conclusion

The colorectum is a complex organ with multiple roles in homeostasis. By increasing understanding of its anatomy and complex physiology, the colorectal surgeon can gain a better understanding of the etiology of derangements in pathophysiologic conditions. In addition, a thorough under­standing of colorectal physiology allows an opportunity to develop new therapies based on its known functions. These examples are demonstrated with much greater detail through­out other chapters of the text.

References

1. Hurst AF. An address on the sins and sorrows of the colon. Delivered before the harrogate medical society on November 26,
1921. Br Med J. 1922;1(3207):941–3.
2. Bleier JIS, Wilkins KB.Colonic physiology. In: Beck DE, Roberts P, Saclarides T, Senagore A, Stamos M, Wexner SD, ed. The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery, 3rd ed. NewYork: Springer Science +Business LLC: 2016; pg 27–28.
3. Danowitz M, Solounias N.Embryology, comparative anatomy, and congenital malformations of the gastrointestinal tract. Edorium J Anat Embryo. 2016;3:39–50. (embryology gure).
4. Rose C, Parker A, Jefferson B, Cartmell E.The characterization of feces and urine; a review of the literature to inform advanced treat­ment technology. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2015;45:1827–79.
5. Phillips SF, Giller J.The contribution of the colon to electrolyte and water conservation in man. J Lab Clin Med. 1973;81:733–46.
6. Cannon WB.The movements of the intestines studied by means of the Röentgen rays. Am J Phys. 1902;6:251–77.
7. Othman A, Al-Shboul. The importance of interstitial cells of cajal in the gastrointestinal tract. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(1):3–15.
8. Sellers RS, Morton D.The colon: from banal to brilliant. Toxicol Pathol. 2014;42(1):67–81.
9. Cox HM.Neuroendocrine peptide mechanisms controlling intesti­nal epithelial function. Current Opinion Pharmacol. 2016;31:50–6.
10. Johnson LR. Fluid and electrolyte absorption. In LR Johnson Ed, Gastrointestinal physiology, 9th ed. Elsevier 2019;121–125.
11. Gurney MA, Laubitz D, Ghishan FK, etal. Pathophysiology of intestinal Na+/H+ exchange. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;3(1):27–40.
12. Sandle GI.Pathogenesis of diarrhea in ulcerative colitis: new views on an old problem. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39:S49–52.
13. Kunzelmann K, Mall M. Electrolyte transport in the mammalian colon: mechanisms and implications for disease. Physiol Rev. 2002;82(1):245–89.
14. Edmonds CJ.Absorption of sodium and water by human rectum measured by a dialysis method. Gut. 1971;12:356–62.
15. Singh SK, Binder HJ, Boron WF, etal. Fluid absorption in isolated perfused colonic crypts. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:2373–9.
16. Bergman EN. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiol Rev. 1990;70:567–90.
17. Kiela PR, Ghishan FK.Na+/H+ exchange in mammalian digestive tract. In: Said HM, Ghishan FK, editors. Physiology of the gastro­intestinal tract. 6th ed. London: Academic Press, Elselvier; 2018. p.1273–316.
18. Bharucha AE, Brookes SJH. Neurophysiologic mechanisms of human large intestinal motility. In: Said HM, Ghishan FK, editors. Physiology of the gastrointestinal tract. 6th ed. London: Academic Press, Elselvier; 2018. p.517–64.
19. Said HM.Intestinal absorption of vitamin K: cellular and molecu­lar mechanisms. In: Said HM, editor. Physiology of the gastro­intestinal tract. 6th ed. London: Academic Press, Eselvier; 2018. p.1197–9.
20. Brookes SJ, Spencer NJ, Costa M, et al. Extrinsic primary afferent signaling in the gut. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:286–96.
21. Furness JB.Disorders of motility and secretion and therapeutic tar­gets in the enteric nervous system. In: Furness, editor. The enteric nervous system. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006. p.200–11.
22. Boeckxstaens G, Camilleri M, Sifrim D, et al. Fundamentals of neurogastroenterology: physiology/motility – sensation. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1292–304.
23. Lomax AE, Sharkey KA, Furness JB.The participation of the sym­pathetic innervation of the gastrointestinal tract in disease states. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;22:7–18.
24. Knowles CH, Scott SM, Lunnis PJ.Slow transit constipation: a dis­order of pelvic autonomic nerves? Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46:389–401.
25. Keszthelyi D, Troost FJ, Masclee AA.Irritable bowel syndrome: methods, mechanisms, and pathophysiology. Methods to assess visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;303:G141–54.
26. Ness TJ, Metcalf AM, Gebhart GF.A psychophysiological study in humans using phasic colonic distension as a noxious visceral stimulus. Pain. 1990;43:377–86.
27. Azpiroz F, Bouin M, Camilleri M, etal. Mechanisms of hypersen­sitivity in IBS and functional disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2007;10:62–88.
28. Mertz H, Naliboff B, Munakata J, Niazi N, Mayer EA.Altered rec­tal perception is a biological marker of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1995;109:40–52.
29. Mawe GM, Hoffman JM. Serotonin signaling in the gut­functions and therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:473–86.
30. Rao SS, Sadeghi P, Beaty J. Ambulatory 24-hour colonic manometry in slow-transit constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(12):2405–16.
31. Furukawa Y, Cook IJ, Panagopoulos V, etal. Relationship between sleep patterns and human colonic motor patterns. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:1372–81.
32. Bampton PA, Dinning PG, Kennedy ML, etal. Prolonged multi­point recording of colonic manometry in the unprepared human colon: providing insight into potentially relevant pressure wave parameters. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1838–48.
33. Cremonini F, Delgado-Aros S, Camilleri M.Efcacy of alosetron in irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized con­trolled trials. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003;15:79–86.
34. Camilleri M. Is there an experimental basis for the development of ischaemic colitis as a result of the 5-HT3 antagonist treatment? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2007;19:77–84.
35. Ford A, Suares N.Effect of laxatives and pharmacological therapies in chronic idiopathic constipation: systematic review and meta­analysis. Gut. 2011;60:209–18.
36. Bouras EP, Camilleri M, Burton DD, et al. Prucalopride accel­erates gastrointestinal and colonic transit in patients with con­stipation without a rectal evacuation disorder. Gastroenterol. 2001;120:354–60.
40
G. T. Ault and J. S. Beaty
37. Ao M, Venkatasubramanian J, Boonkaewwan C, etal. Lubiprostone activated Cl secretion via cAMP signaling and increases membrane CFTR in the human colon carcinoma cell line, T84. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:339–51.
38. Sweetser S, Busciglio IA, Camilleri M, et al. Effect of a chloride channel activator, lubiprostone, on colonic sensory and motor func­tions in healthy subjects. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;296:G295–301.
39. Schey R, Rao SSC. Lubiprostone for the treatment of adults with constipation and irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:1619–25. Motility in physiology of the gastrointestinal tract. 6th Ed. Elsevier; 2018, pp517–64.
40. Manabe N, Cremonini F, Camilleri M, etal. Effects of bisacodyl on ascending colon emptying and overall colonic transit in healthy volunteers. Ailment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:930–6.
41. Ewe K, Holker B.The effect of a diphenolic laxative (Bisacodyl) on water and electrolyte transport in the human colon (author’s transl). Klin Wochenschr. 1974;52:827–33.
42. Kamm MA, Dudding TC, Melenhorst J, etal. Sacral nerve stimula­tion for intractable constipation. Gut. 2010;59:33–40.
43. Dinning PG, Fuentealba SE, Kennedy ML, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation induces pan-colonic propagating pressure waves and increases defecation frequency in patients with slow-transit consti­pation. Color Dis. 2007;9:123–32.
44. Garner CE, Smith S, de Lacy CB, etal. Volatile organic compounds from feces and their potential for diagnosis of gastrointestinal dis­ease. FASEB J. 2007;21:1675–88.
45. Spohn SN, Young VB.Gastrointestinal microbial ecology with per­spectives on health and disease. In: Physiology of the gastrointes­tinal tract. 6th ed: Elsevier; 2018. p.737–53.
46. Ahmed I, Greenwood R, Costello BL, et al. An investigation of fecal volatile organic metabolites in irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS One. 2013;8:e58204.
47. Nyangale EP, Mottram DS, Gibson GR. Gut microbial activity, implications for health and disease: the potential role of metabolite analysis. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:5573–85.
48. Adams JB, Johansen LJ, Powell LD, et al. Gastrointestinal ora and gastrointestinal status in children with autism-comparisons to typical children and correlation with autism severity. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:22.
49. Imhann F, Vich Vila A, Bonder MJ, etal. Interplay of host genetics and gut microbiota underlying the onset and clinical presentation of inammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2018;67:108–19.
50. Nitzan O, Elias M, Peretz A, etal. Role of antibiotics for treat­ment of inammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:1078–87.
51. Peterson J, Garges S, Giovanni M, etal. The NIH human microbi­ome project. Genome Res. 2009;19:2317–23.
52. Proctor LM.The human microbiome project in 2011 and beyond. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;10:287–91.
53. Gevers D, Knight R, Petrosino JF, etal. The human microbiome project: a community resource for the healthy human microbiome. PLoS Biol. 2012;10(8):e1001377.
54. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, func­tion and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486(7402):207–14.
55. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature. 2012;486:215–21.
56. Integrative HMP (iHMP) Research Network Consortium. The Integrative Human Microbiome Project: dynamic analysis of microbiome-host omics proles during periods of human health and disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;16(3):276–89.
57. Bouchie A.White house unveils National Microbiome Initiative. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(6):580.
58. Ley RE, Peterson DA, Gordon JI. Ecological and evolutionary forces shaping microbial diversity in the human intestine. Cell. 2006;124(4):837–48.
59. Sullivan A, Edlund C, Nord NE.Effect of antimicrobial agents on the ecological balance of human microora. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001;1(2):101–14.
60. De La Cochetiere MF, Durand T, Lalande V, et al. Effect of anti­biotic therapy on human fecal microbiota and the relation to the development of. Microb Ecol. 2008;56:395–402.
61. Dethlefsen L, Huse S, Sogin ML, etal. The pervasive effects of an antibiotic on the human gut microbiota, as revealed by deep 16S rRNA sequencing. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:2383–400.
62. Modi SR, Collins JJ, Relman DA.Antibiotics and the gut micro­biota. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:4212–8.

Anorectal Physiology

PasithornA.Suwanabol andScottE.Regenbogen
3
Key Concepts
• Maintenance of fecal continence and defecation are com­plex processes requiring both voluntary and involuntary reexes that have yet to be fully characterized.
• Normal continence is dependent on coordination between neuronal reexes, sensory and motor pathways, the rec­tum, anal sphincters, and pelvic oor and requires ade­quate rectal compliance and competence of the anal sphincter.
• During defecation, sensory mechanisms allow the rectum to stretch to accommodate feces, the pelvic oor muscles relax, and intraabdominal pressure increases. Simultaneously, the puborectalis relaxes and straightens the anorectal angle, the anal canal shortens, and the pelvic oor descends. Finally, the anal sphincters relax and evac­uation is initiated.
• Anatomy and physiology of the rectum and anus are intrinsically related, allowing physiologic testing to be exceedingly useful for diagnosis and management of ano­rectal pathologies.
• Disorders of continence can derive from decits of men­tal, anatomic, and physiologic functions, including reexes, sensory and motor nerves, and the muscles of the rectum, sphincters, and pelvic oor.
• Functional defecatory disorders frequently coexist with urogynecologic conditions likely due to the shared mus­culature of the pelvic oor and urogenital diaphragm, as well as from the overlap in peripheral innervation and spi­nal nerve roots.
P. A. Suwanabol · S. E. Regenbogen (*) University of Michigan, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA e-mail: pasuwan@med.umich.edu; sregenbo@med.umich.edu

Introduction

Recognition and appropriate management of anorectal pathology require an understanding of both anatomy and physiology of the rectum, anus, and pelvic oor. The purpose of this chapter is to review the anatomy and innervation of the rectum and anus, characterize normal continence and defecation, and provide an overview of physiologic testing relevant to anorectal physiology and pathophysiology. In addition, we will briey review the pathophysiology of func­tional disorders of the anus and rectum.
In general, defecation and maintenance of fecal conti­nence are complex processes requiring both voluntary and involuntary reexes that have yet to be fully characterized. Much of what is known is based on an understanding of pathologic disorders and functional studies among healthy subjects or animals. Despite our incomplete understanding of anorectal physiology, it is critical to gain as much knowl­edge of normal and abnormal physiology as possible as it will enable the surgeon to advise and intervene when needed.

Anatomy

For detailed discussion of the anatomy and physiology of the rectum and anus, please refer to Chap. 1.
The rectum serves as a reservoir for feces, measuring approximately 12–15cm in length, yet its proximal and dis­tal margins continue to be debated– particularly in light of differences in treatment approaches for lower gastrointesti­nal cancers [1]. The rectum, which is identied in the abdo­men by the lack of haustra, taeniae, or epiploica, is located along the curve of the sacrum and coccyx and becomes the anal canal as it passes through the levators [2]. The rectal wall contains a layer of longitudinal smooth muscle and a layer of circular smooth muscle that are in continuity with the gastrointestinal tract [3]. The rectum encompasses three folds, known as the valves of Houston, which do not contain all the muscle wall layers and are not believed to serve any
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 S. R. Steele et al. (eds.), The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66049-9_3
41
42
Female pelvis (from below)
urethral or
e
P. A. Suwanabol and S. E. Regenbogen
specic function. The middle valve corresponds to the ante­rior peritoneal reection and is the most consistent with regard to location and its presence [2].
Like the rectum, the denition of the anus or anal canal is controversial and is distinguished by embryologic origin and mucosal histology or by its function. The embryologic anal canal, which does not incorporate anal function, is dened as the area from the anal verge to the dentate line [2]. First described by Milligan and Morgan in 1934in order to guide anorectal surgery, the functional or surgical anal canal begins where the rectum enters the pelvic hiatus and passes through the puborectalis. It encompasses the area from the anal verge to the anorectal ring and is surrounded by the anal sphincters and the puborectalis [4]. On average, the functional or surgi­cal anal canal measures approximately 2.5–5cm in length and is shorter in females [5]. The anal canal is characterized by columnar mucosa above the dentate line and squamous epithelia below, which are important as they represent two separate inputs, supplied by different aspects of the arterial­venous, lymphatic, and nervous systems [6]. Above the den­tate line, the anal canal is supplied and drained by the hypogastric vessels and innervated by the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. Below the dentate line, the anal canal is supplied by the inferior hemorrhoidal ves­sels and innervated by the somatic nervous system [2] The 1–2cm area between these two regions is known as the tran­sition or cloacogenic zone, which is composed of columnar, transitional, and stratied squamous epithelium [6].
The anal sphincter complex consists of the internal anal sphincter (IAS), the conjoined longitudinal muscle (CLM), and the external anal sphincter (EAS). The IAS is a 2–3mm thick circular band composed of the distal inner circular smooth muscle layer of the rectum, which is always maxi­mally contracted to prevent involuntary loss of stool and a­tus [3]. The IAS is encompassed proximally by the levator ani and distally by the supercial external sphincter muscle and subcutaneous external straited anal sphincter muscle [7,
8]. The CLM, located between the IAS and the EAS, is com-
posed of the bers of the outer layer of the rectum at the level of the anorectal ring and runs distally to the puborectalis muscle [9]. The CLM’s functions are unclear, but it may con­tribute minimally to maintaining continence and defecation [10, 11]. More importantly, the CLM may act as a scaffold­ing for the entire anal sphincter complex [12]. The EAS comprises striated muscle as a continuation of the puborecta­lis muscle and is attached anteriorly to the perineal body and posteriorly to the anococcygeal ligament. The EAS is in con­stant state of tonic contractile activity, even at rest, and vol­untarily contracts during any threat of incontinence [13].
The pelvic oor muscles include the levator ani, which consists of the pubococcygeus, puborectalis, and iliococcy­geus (Fig.3.1). These muscles function to support the viscera of the pelvic cavity and play a key role in defecation [7]. The pubococcygeus arises from the posterior pubis, travels along­side the anorectal junction, and inserts into the anococcygeus ligament and the coccyx. The puborectalis is a U-shaped
Fig. 3.1 Muscles of the pelvic oor. (Illustration created by H.R.Fischer, MFA)
Clitoris
External
ifice
Ischiopubic
ramus
Vagina
Perineal body
Anus
Anococcygeal
ligament
Ishciocavernous muscle
Bulbospongiosus muscle
Perineal membrane
Superficial transvers perineal muscle
External anal sphincter musctes:
Deep Superficial Subcutaneous
Levator ani muscles:
Pubococcygeus Puborectalis lliococcygeus
Gluteus maximus muscle
3 Anorectal Physiology
43
muscle that slings the anorectal junction to the posterior pubis to pull the rectum anteriorly and forms the anorectal angle. It is palpable on digital rectal exam as the top of the anorectal ring [3]. The iliococcygeus arises from the ischial spine and obturator fascia, travels inferiorly and medially, and inserts into the anococcygeal raphe and coccyx [2].

Physiology

Innervation oftheAnus andPelvic Floor
Sympathetic nerves derived from L1, L2, and L3 join the preaortic plexus, which then extend to form the hypogastric plexus below the aorta. These then join parasympathetic bers called nervi erigentes (S2, S3, and S4) to form the pel­vic plexus (Fig.3.2) [14]. Motor innervation of the IAS is supplied by the sympathetic (L5) and parasympathetic nerves (S2, S3, and S4) from the autonomic nervous system. In contrast, the EAS is supplied by the inferior rectal branch of the pudendal nerve (S2 and S3) and by the perineal branch of S4 from the somatic nervous system. Unilateral transec­tion of the pudendal nerve does not impact EAS function due to ber crossover at the spinal cord level [15]. The sacral roots of S3 and S4, the perineal branch, and the inferior rec­tal nerve of the pudendal nerve innervate the levator ani [16]. The pudendal nerve branches supply the pubococcygeus and puborectalis, whereas direct sacral nerves S3 and S4 inner­vate the iliococcygeus [17].
Upper anal canal sensory innervation is supplied by both free and organized sensory nerve endings, including Meissner’s corpuscles (touch), Krause’s bulbs (temperature), Golgi-Mazzoni bodies (pressure), and genital corpuscles (friction) [18, 19]. Within the transition zone of the anal canal, these organized nerve endings may play a role in sam­pling [20]. The inferior rectal branch of the pudendal nerve provides anal sensation and may provide some maintenance of fecal continence [2, 21, 22]. In addition, it may play a smaller role in discriminating between solid and gas [23].
Normal Continence
Normal continence requires adequate rectal compliance to accommodate fecal contents and competence of the anal sphincter to resist propulsive forces of the distal gastrointes­tinal tract, assess its contents, and release them under volun­tary control [7, 24]. Although normal continence is incompletely understood, it is known to be dependent on complex coordination between neuronal reexes, sensory and motor pathways, the rectum, anal sphincters, and pelvic oor [25, 26].
Rectal Sensation andCompliance
Rectal sensation encompasses the feeling of both rectal ll­ing and anal reexes, which is distinct from the rest of the lower gastrointestinal tract where distension evokes pain [27, 28]. The rectum’s function is to store feces, which requires the ability to accommodate volumes of feces with­out substantially altering rectal pressures. Accommodation is reliant on both the content and the contractile state of the rectum [3, 29]. Baseline rectal pressure is low (approxi­mately 5mmHg) compared to anal canal pressures, which measure approximately 10–14 times that of the rectum. This pressure differential may allow for stool deferment, forcing stool back into the sigmoid and rectum, until defecation is initiated [19]. Although the rectum does not have proprio­ceptive receptors, rectal compliance may be due to unique, slowly adapting mechanoreceptors that respond to tension and rapid distension, termed rectal intra-ganglionic laminar endings (rIGLEs) [30]. This idea is consistent with the observation that rectal lling sensations coincide with increased rectal pressure during rectal distension [27]. Instead, defecation is sensed at the level of the levators and the anal canal, which may underlie the preserved sense of defecation among patients after proctectomy with ileoanal or coloanal anastomoses [31, 32].
Anorectal Reexes
The rectoanal inhibitory reex (RAIR) is an intrinsic intra­mural reex critical to normal continence. It occurs in response to distension of the rectum, relaxing the upper IAS to allow fecal material or atus to interact with specialized receptors in the upper anal canal. This sampling enables a­tus to pass without fecal incontinence as the lower IAS rest­ing pressure, the contraction of the EAS, and puborectalis push feces to the upper rectum and delays defecation [3, 33,
34]. The RAIR occurs every 8–10minutes and lasts less than
10 seconds [35, 36]. The RAIR is absent in those with Hirschsprung’s disease due to the absence of myenteric gan­glia in the rectum [37]. Furthermore, injury or alteration to the RAIR may play a role in patients with poor functional outcome or incontinence after rectal resection [3841].
Less studied anorectal reexes include the cutaneous anal sphincter reex, the bulbocavernosus reex, and the cough­anal reex. The cutaneous anal sphincter reex is dened as contractions of the EAS with touch or pain of the anal skin, while the bulbocavernosus reex is characterized by contrac­tions of the EAS when squeezing the glans penis or clitoris. The bulbocavernosus reex can also occur when a urethral catheter is removed. Finally, the cough-anal reex is described as contractions of the EAS when coughing or snifng. The cough-anal reex is important in maintaining continence during sudden increases of intraabdominal pres­sures, such as coughing, sneezing, or laughing [42].
44
ight sacral
h
P. A. Suwanabol and S. E. Regenbogen
Fig. 3.2 Innervation of the anus and pelvic oor. (Illustration created by H.R.Fischer, MFA)
Female pelvis
(lateral below)
Abdominal aorta
Inferior vena cava
splanchnic
Superior
ypogastric
plexus
Right hypogastric
Internal iliac plexus
Inferior hypogastric
(pelvic plexus)
Sympathetic trunk and L2 ganglion
Lumbar
nerves
Left and r sympathetic trunks and ganglia
nerve
Pelvic parasympathetic nerves
Sacral splanchnic nerves (sympathetic)
Pudendal nerve
Rectal plexus
Rectum (retracted)
Internal andExternal Anal Sphincters
The IAS constitutes approximately 50–70% of resting tone or pressure and is maximally contracted at rest, with the hemorrhoid complexes accounting for an additional 15% of resting tone or pressure [2, 4346]. Hemorrhoid complexes contribute to continence by expanding to create a seal proxi­mal to the anal opening [46]. Due to the intrinsic function of smooth muscle, most of the resting tone is due to myogenic tone, which is characterized by slow, constant waves of con­traction [42, 47]. The IAS receives additional excitatory sympathetic input and inhibitory parasympathetic input,
which are mediated by nitric oxide [3, 4850]. Injury to the IAS leads to passive fecal incontinence or leakage, whereas injury to the EAS is associated with urge fecal incontinence [3, 51]. Whereas the EAS plays a smaller role in resting tone, its primary contribution to continence involves voluntary or reexive contraction in response to rectal distention and threat of incontinence, for example, during increases in intraabdominal pressure [3, 52]. Similarly, defecation may be deferred by contraction of the EAS to oppose increased rectal pressure. After EAS contraction, the sensation of urgency and tenesmus will diminish over a period of time
Uterus, fallopian tube and ovary (retracted)