Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6011_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
95 Мб
Скачать
C H A P T E R 4 6 Tumors of the oracic Spine
295
A
B
F I G UR E 4 6- 7   Sagittal (A) and Axial  (B) CT images of the  spine demonstrating a lytic destructive  process at T9-10, 
with associated large right paraspinal mass (myeloma). Note that despite the significant destruction of the bone, there is no  deformity of the spine.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
e patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position to allow access to the right thoracoabdominal region and the posterior thoracolumbar spine. e posterior thoracolumbar spine was exposed from T7 to L2. Pedicle screws were placed at T7 to T8, and T11-L1. Only one screw could be placed at L2, and in the lateral position, screws could not be successfully placed at T6. A temporary rod was placed on the left side of the spine to stabilize the spine during the decompression. T9 and T10 laminectomies were fashioned and tumor in the epidural space was resected. A right thoracotomy incision
was fashioned over the 9th and 10th ribs and connected to the thoracolumbar incision dorsally. A portion of the 9th and 10th ribs distal to the tumor was resected. is allowed access to the pleural cavity. e 9th and 10th ribs were disarticulated from the spine to allow the paraspinal component of the tumor to be resected with the chest wall. Corpectomies of T9 and T10 were per­formed to resect the remaining tumor. e segment was reconstructed with an expandable cage encompassing T8 to T11. A lateral plate was also placed from T8 to T11. Final rods were placed posteriorly and bone grafting was performed with allograft. Plastic surgery assisted with the closure and recon­struction of the chest wall.
296
P A R T V I Other Surgical Treatment Modalities: Thoracic Spine
A
B
F IG U R E 4 6- 8A, Sagittal and B, Axial T2-weighted images, demonstrating a mass (myeloma) at T9-10 with epidural 
spinal cord compression. Note the extensive paraspinal component of the mass.
POSTOPERATIVE COURSE
e patient remained at his neurological baseline postoperatively. His pathol­ogy again confirmed the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. His postoperative course was complicated by a prolonged air leak requiring a chest tube. He
was discharged on postoperative day 17. Postoperative imaging showed good position of the instrumentation (Figure 46-9). At 2.5 years post surgery he remains neurologically intact with an intact construct. He has had skeletal progression of the myeloma to stage III.

DISCUSSION

Metasatic tumors are the most common neoplasms affecting the thoracic spine. Based on the work of Patchell et al surgery followed by radiation therapy has replaced radiation therapy alone as the gold standard for treat­ment of MESCC. Extremely radiation-sensitive tumors include small cell lung carcinoma, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. For these lesions, radia­tion therapy may still be employed as a first-line treatment modality for MESCC. The surgical approach may be anterior, posterior, or combined anterior/posterior. En bloc spondylectomy may be employed specifi­cally for certain locally aggressive primary spinal column neoplasms. Prior
to embarking on treatment, it is important to know the tumor histology. Therefore, CT-guided biopsy is recommended in patients who have stable or preserved neurological function. Tumor history, tumor location, anatomy of spinal disease, extent of systemic disease/medical comorbidities, and ver­tebral column compromise are factors that dictate the surgical approach. Thoracic spinal column neoplasms require reconstruction with instrumen­tation, with the exception of IMSCTs and some IDEM tumors. The clinical goals of surgery for thoracic spinal column neoplasms include local disease control, preservation or restoration of neurological function, stabilization of the spinal column, and pain control.
C H A P T E R 4 6 Tumors of the oracic Spine
297
A
B
F IG U R E 4 6 -9   Sagittal, coronal,  axial, and scouts views, status post resection and reconstruction with instrumenta-
tion via a combined anterior and posterior approach.
298
P A R T V I Other Surgical Treatment Modalities: Thoracic Spine
Case 4: En Bloc
PATIENT PRESENTATION
A 67-year-old male with a history of prostate cancer treated with resec­tion and thought to be in remission presented with upper lumbar/lower thoracic and right paraspinal pain. Associated symptoms included local numbness and paresthesias and more recent numbness and paresthesias in his feet. An MRI of the thoracic and lumbar spine (Figure 46-10) was performed with and without contrast as well as plain films. e plain films did not demonstrate evidence of bony changes; however, MRI showed a T2-hyperintense and contrast-enhancing lesion at T10 with epidural extension and spinal cord compression. Although the patient had some mild myelopathic signs on exam (hypereflexia), his motor exam was nor­mal and his gait and sphincter function were both normal. e differential diagnosis included chordoma, given the T2 hyperintensity that is typical of this lesion. Also included on the list was metastatic disease, with prostate being the highest possibility on the list given his previous history. Because chordoma was on the list, representing a locally aggressive tumor that is rarely cured with intralesional resection alone, a CT-guided biopsy was rec­ommended through a posterior approach to confirm the pathology prior to recommending further treatment. e report confirmed a chordoma. An en bloc surgical resection was recommended. An all-posterior approach was recommended with the caveat that if en bloc resection could not be
achieved in this fashion, the posterior resection of the posterior elements at T10 would be followed by a thoracotomy with anterior en bloc vertebral body resection.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
e patient was positioned prone on the Jackson table. e posterior spine was exposed from T7 to T12. e surgical plan was to stop the construct at T12/the thoracolumbar (TL) junction. Although stopping a construct at a junctional level may not be ideal, the authors feel that when this is done with a construct ending on the superior side of the TL junction, it is better tolerated than ending on the inferior side of the TL junction. However, there is no solid data to support this clinical belief. We also felt that ending at T7 was high enough above the apex of the patient’s thoracic kyphosis, which we estimated to be at T8-9 or T9-10 based on the imaging. Pedicle screws were therefore placed at T7-T9 and T11-T12 bilaterally. Laminectomies at T9 and T11 were subsequently fashioned. Two Tomita saws were then placed between the lamina of T10 and the dura at the junction with the facet joint. Using the Tomita saws, the spi­nous process and bilateral lamina of T10 were removed in en bloc fashion. Using silk ligatures to prevent a CSF leak, the bilateral T9 and T10 nerve
AA
B
B
C
F IG U R E 4 6- 10 A, Sagittal and B, Axial T2-weighted MRI of the thoracic spine demonstrating a high-signal-intensity 
lesion at T10 (chordoma) with epidural spinal cord compression. T1-weighted postcontrast and precontrast images (c) dem- onstrate enhancement of the lesion.
C H A P T E R 4 6 Tumors of the oracic Spine
299
A
B
C
F IG U R E 46 -1 1  Intraoperative photographs. A, Posterior spinal hardware and the bilateral lung fields adjacent to the 
spinal cord at the spondylectomy site. B, Anteriorly-placed distractible cage at the site of the en bloc spondylectomy. C, Gross  pathological specimen of the T10 en bloc spondylectomy. Note the epidural tumor capsule posterior to the vertebral body.
roots were ligated proximal to the dorsal root ganglion. e nerve roots typically have to be sectioned at one or two levels to deliver the vertebral body posteriorly in an en bloc spondylectomy. It is felt that sectioning the roots proximal to the dorsal root ganglion decreases the possibility of postoperative neuropathic radicular pain. e thecal sac was carefully
F IG UR E 4 6- 12   Postoperative AP and lateral x-rays 
of the thoracic spine demonstrating the reconstruction.
dissected from the anterolaterally situated epidural tumor. e paraspinal muscles were dissected off of the rib cage and retracted medially with Pen­rose drains. e bilateral T10 ribs were then resected from 1 cm distal to the costotransverse junction to 5 cm distal to that point. e pleura was opened and a chest spreader was placed, first on the left and then on the
300
P A R T V I Other Surgical Treatment Modalities: Thoracic Spine
right. e lung was retracted away from the field and the vessels (aorta and vena cava) were dissected off the pleura and T9 and T10 vertebral bodies in a circumferential fashion. Both T9 and T10 segmental vessels were ligated bilaterally. Rods were then attached to the screw heads from T7 through T12. Using Tomita saws, the midvertebral body of T9 was transected, as was the T10-T11 disc space. is completely mobilized the specimen. e specimen was then removed posterolaterally in en bloc fashion (Figure 46-11). A distractible cage was placed from T9 to T11. Bone grafting was done with allograft. Neurological monitoring remained stable throughout the case.

References

1. T.F. Witham, et al., Surgery insight: current management of epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic spine disease, Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2 (2) (2006) 87–94.
2. M. Bilsky, Metastatic tumors of the spine and spinal cord, in: C.A. Dickman, M.G. Fehlings, Z.L. Gokaslan (Eds.), Spinal Cord and Spinal Column Tumors, Thieme, New York, 2005.
3. R.A. Patchell, et al., Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial, Lancet 366 (9486) (2005) 643–648.
4. P.C. McCormick, BB: Spinal tumors, in: L.C., R.G. Grossman (Eds.), Principles of neuro­surgery, Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1999.
5. S.J. Hentschel, M.I., Intradural extramedullary spinal tumors, in: M.G. Fehlings, C.A. Dick­man, Z.L. Gokaslan (Eds.), Spinal cord and spinal column tumors, Thieme, New York, 2005.
6. P.R. Cooper, H.K, Intramedullary spinal cord tumors, in:M.G. Fehlings, C.A. Dickman, Z.L. Gokaslan (Eds.), Spinal cord and spinal column tumors, Thieme, New York, 2005.
7. W.B. Jacobs, F.M, Primary vertebral column tumors, in: M.G. Fehlings, C.A. Dickman, Z.L. Gokaslan (Eds.), Spinal cord and spinal column tumors, Thieme, New York, 2005.
8. J.H. Chi, et al., Epidemiology and demographics for primary vertebral tumors, Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 19 (1) (2008) 1–4.
POSTOPERATIVE COURSE
e patient was taken to the intensive care unit with preserved lower extremity neurological function. He remained intubated until postoperative day 1 when he was successfully extubated. Postoperative imaging disclosed good position of his cage and posterior screws (Figure 46-12). His postop­erative course was complicated by new-onset atrial fibrillation. His chest tubes were discontinued on postoperative days 5 and 6 respectively. He was discharged on postoperative day 8. At 3 months after surgery, he was off narcotics and returned to work. Proton beam irradiation was scheduled.
9. A. Mantha, et al., A novel rat model for the study of intraosseous metastatic spine cancer, J Neurosurg. Spine 2 (3) (2005) 303–307.
10. C.A. Bagley, et al., Fractionated, single-port radiotherapy delays paresis in a metastatic spinal tumor model in rats, J. Neurosurg. Spine 7 (3) (2007) 323–327.
11. C.A. Bagley, et al., Local delivery of oncogel delays paresis in rat metastatic spinal tumor model, J. Neurosurg. Spine 7 (2) (2007) 194–198.
12. B. Gok, et al., Surgical resection plus adjuvant radiotherapy is superior to surgery or radio­therapy alone in the prevention of neurological decline in a rat metastatic spinal tumor model, Neurosurgery 63 (2) (2008) 346–351.
13. W.A. Pennant, et al., Microsurgical removal of intramedullary spinal cord gliomas in a rat spinal cord decreases onset to paresis, an animal model for intramedullary tumor treatment, Childs Nerv. Syst. 24 (8) (2008) 901–907.
14. J. Schuster, J. Zhang, M. Longo, A novel human osteoblast-derived severe combined immu­nodeficiency mouse model of bone metastasis, J Neurosurg. Spine 4 (5) (2006) 388–391.
15. D.R. Fourney, Z.L. Gokaslan, Use of “MAPs” for determining the optimal surgical approach to metastatic disease of the thoracolumbar spine: anterior, posterior, or combined: invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004, J. Neurosurg. Spine 2 (1) (2005) 40–49.
Infections of the Thoracic Spine
Daniel J. Hoh and Michael Y. Wang
47
k e y p o i n t s
e incidence of reported spinal infections is increasing, which is likely to
be related to a growing elderly population that is living longer with chronic disease and undergoing more spinal procedures.
Spinal infections are of significant concern, as they can cause pathologic
fractures, instability, loss of spinal alignment, and neural compression resulting in pain, deformity, and neurological deficit.
Improved diagnostic and therapeutic modalities are available that make
possible earlier identification of the pathologic organism, initiation of appropriate pharmacotherapy, and better eradication of infection with less recurrence.
e indications for surgical intervention are to identify the pathologic
organism, prevent neurological deterioration, restore spinal alignment, maintain stability, and treat disabling pain. A variety of surgical approaches are available including anterior, posterior, and circumferential techniques. Decision-making regarding surgical approach is dependent on extent of disease, need for spinal reconstruction and stabilization, and the patient’s overall surgical risk.
Advances in surgical technique, instrumentation, and biomedical technology
are improving operative treatment of spinal infections. Recent developments include the increasingly safe use of titanium-based implants, alternative graft options, and the introduction of minimally invasive spinal surgery. Prognosis for patients with spinal infections is improving as a result of these advances in diagnostic, medical, and surgical modalities.

INTRODUCTION

The last several decades have witnessed a rise in reported spinal infections. This increase has largely been attributed to factors associated with a growing elderly population. Improvements in medical care have directly resulted in prolonged life expectancy with more individuals living longer with chronic diseases. As a result, various medical conditions associated with advanced age, such as diabetes or illnesses that lead to immunocompromise, predis­pose patients to developing spinal infections. Additionally, as individuals are living longer, more elderly patients are seeking to undergo spinal procedures for degenerative conditions that otherwise, left untreated, result in debilitat­ing pain. Both minor procedures such as discography and epidural injec­tions and extensive spinal fusion surgeries pose the risk of direct bacterial inoculation of the spine.
Infections of the spine are characterized either by their microbiology or by the location of pathology. From a microbiology standpoint, spinal infec­tions are differentiated by pyogenic or granulomatous etiologies. Pyogenic infections are generally of bacterial origin. Granulomatous spinal infections encompass fungal etiologies, but include some bacterial sources, and refer primarily to the histologic course of the infection. Spinal tuberculosis is by far the most common of the granulomatous spinal infections worldwide.
Spinal infections are also classified by the primary location of patho­genesis. Sole involvement of the disc space is referred to as discitis. Osteo­myelitis is an infection of the bony spine (Figure 47-1). Osteodiscitis or
spondylodiscitis is combined involvement of the intervertebral disc and the vertebra. Abscess or granulation formation can occur in a subdural, epidural, or paravertebral location (Figure 47-2). Frequently, spinal infections invade all compartments of the spinal column, including the soft tissues, bony spine, and within the spinal canal.
Spinal osteomyelitis is estimated to occur in 1 in 100,000 to 250,000, and accounts for 2% to 7% of all cases of osteomyelitis. Spinal osteomyelitis occurs more commonly among older individuals, with approximately one half of all patients being over 50 years of age. Similarly, epidural abscesses occur in adults and are estimated to occur in 0.2 to 1.2 per 10,000 hospi­tal admissions annually. When bacterial spinal infections occur in younger individuals, they are more commonly seen in intravenous drug users. Both osteomyelitis and epidural abscesses generally occur in the thoracic and lumbar spine, with thoracic infections representing over a third to half of all cases, and lumbar infections accounting for a majority of the remainder. Cervical spine infections are estimated to account for only 5% to 14% of all cases.
Outside the United States, spinal tuberculosis still represents a consid­erable health care problem. Tuberculosis is relatively common in underde­veloped countries where malnutrition and overcrowding are present. It is estimated that 2 billion people have tuberculosis worldwide, with 9 mil­lion new cases each year. Approximately 5% of these patients have spinal involvement. Spinal tuberculosis is a major source of morbidity, represent­ing the most common cause of nontraumatic paraplegia in underdeveloped countries.
While the incidence of spinal infections is increasing, management of these conditions is also dramatically evolving. Earlier detection, better screening and surveillance, and advanced imaging modalities have improved diagnosis of spinal infections and identification of pathogenic organisms. More effective antimicrobial pharmacotherapy has led to better medical treatment with clearance of infection and less recurrence. Surgical treatment options have incorporated advances in surgical technique, instrumentation, and biomedical technology to increase eradication of infection, preservation of neurological function, restoration of spinal alignment, and prevention of deformity and chronic pain.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

The pathophysiology of spinal infection ultimately begins with the indi­vidual’s underlying predisposing risk factors. Advanced age, diabetes, and multiple medical comorbidities are associated with increased risk for spinal infection. Additionally, spinal surgery, intravenous drug use, and immunocompromise contribute to further risk. Infection generally metas­tasizes hematogenously to the spine from extraspinal sources such as the urinary tract, respiratory system, skin or soft tissue infections, or cardiac vegetations. Direct inoculation from surgery, percutaneous procedures, or penetrating trauma is an additional modality for bacterial seeding. Local invasion to the spine also occurs from infected adjacent or contiguous sources such as the retroperitoneal, abdominopelvic, pleural, or retro­pharyngeal spaces. Spread of infection can also occur within the spinal column by direct extension from the bony or soft tissue elements to the epidural space.
301
302
P A R T V I Other Surgical Treatment Modalities: Thoracic Spine
F IG UR E 47 -1   T1-weighted  sagittal MRI after  administration of intra-
venous  gadolinium  in  the  same  patient,  demonstrating  abnormal  enhance­ment. The osteodiscitis at the lower thoracic region has an associated epidural  abscess causing ventral spinal cord compression.
F IG UR E 47 -2   T1-weighted sagittal MRI  with gadolinium of  the  lum-
bar spine in a different patient, demonstrating the ring-enhancing contrast pat­tern of an epidural abscess.
F IG UR E 4 7 -3   T2-weighted  sagittal  MRI  in  a  64-year-old  male  with 
subacute osteodiscitis. Advanced bone loss and significant subchondral destruc­tion has created a severe local kyphosis at the affected level.

Bacterial Pathogenesis

Hematogenous seeding of the spine may occur via either arterial or venous pathways. The venous plexi that drain from within the spinal canal commu­nicate with plexi that form a venous ring around each vertebral body. This venous system communicates with the venous drainage of the pelvis. Batson demonstrated that this venous pathway is a valveless system in which micro­organisms may circulate and lodge in the low-flow end-organ vasculature surrounding the vertebral body. Alternatively, direct bacterial seeding of the vertebral body may occur from ascending and descending arterial branches that send penetrating vessels to the vertebral body.
Pathologic sequelae of spinal infection include loss of spinal alignment with progressive deformity, and risk of neurological compromise. Bacterial involvement of the spinal column with subsequent inflammatory infiltra­tion causes bony destruction and eventually erodes the subchondral plate to involve the relatively avascular disc space (Figure 47-3). Advanced bone loss, particularly across multiple adjacent segments, combined with disc space narrowing, leads to progressive kyphotic deformity. neurological com­promise may result from severe bony destruction, resulting in pathologic fracture with retropulsed bony fragments into the canal. Epidural abscess formation or extension of inflammatory granulation tissue into the canal can cause direct compression of the spinal cord or nerve roots. Additionally, septic thrombosis of veins within the epidural space or the arteriolar supply can cause ischemic injury. Particularly, in a spinal cord already compromised by mechanical compression from either an abscess or fracture, hypoperfu­sion from thrombosed feeding arteries or draining veins may lead to rapid neurological deterioration.
Gram-positive cocci are the most prevalent inciting organism, repre­senting 50% to 67% of all causative organisms. Staphylococcus aureus is the most prevalent bacteria identified, accounting for 80% of all gram­positive infections, and 55% of all spinal infections. In a meta-analysis of 915 patients with epidural abscess, S. aureus was identified as the causative organism in 73.2% of cases. Gram-negative bacteria, particularly Esch- erichia coli and Proteus, are more frequently identified in patients with pre­existing urinary tract infections. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is most common
F IG UR E 4 7 -4   T2-weighted  sagittal  MRI  of  the  lumbar  spine  in  a 
58-year-old  woman  with  spinal  tuberculosis,  showing  fracture  of  L1,  retro­pulsed fragments in the canal, and neural compression.
among immunocompromised patients or intravenous drug users. Indolent infections are more likely to occur with low-virulence organisms such as Streptococcus viridans or Staphylococcus epidermisdis.
Pathogenesis of Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis of the spine results from hematogenous spread of Mycobacte­rium tuberculosis from well-established extraspinal foci, primarily originating
from the respiratory or genitourinary tract. Unlike pyogenic osteomyelitis, spinal tuberculosis may begin in the paradiscal area and spread under the anterior longitudinal ligament to involve adjacent vertebral bodies, while rel­atively preserving the disc space. Additionally, spinal tuberculosis frequently involves the posterior spinal arch, whereas pyogenic osteomyelitis is primar­ily a disease of only the anterior spinal column. Because spinal tuberculosis often causes widespread destruction of a spinal segment, vertebral collapse with pathologic subluxation, kyphosis, and retropulsion occur in severe cases and present greater risk for acute neurological compromise than bac­terial osteomyelitis (Figure 47-4). Delayed chronic paresis also occurs with progressive deformity or in the setting of epidural granulomas that result from longstanding tuberculous infection.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

The clinical presentation of bacterial spinal infections often depends on the virulence of the organism, the duration of infection, and the overall integrity of the patient’s immune system. Improved diagnostic modalities have led to earlier detection of disease, with initiation of appropriate medical therapy often before patients develop systemic illness or potentially irreversible neu­rological compromise. Over 90% of patients with pyogenic osteomyelitis present with axial neck or back pain as the primary complaint. The pain is generally characterized as insidious and nonmechanical in nature, and unre­lieved by recumbency. Patients frequently note local spine tenderness with limited range of motion. Constitutional symptoms associated with infection such as fevers, chills, and malaise may also be present: however, an elevated temperature is only found in 52% of patients at time of presentation.
C H A P T E R 4 7     Infections of the oracic Spine
303
Neurological findings are less common with pyogenic osteomyelitis. A review of the literature reveals that only 17% of patients with bacterial osteomyelitis have neurological signs or symptoms on initial presentation. Alternatively, neurological complaints are frequently associated with acute bacterial epidural abscess, with 56% of patients presenting with motor defi­cits, and 36% with radicular pain. The clinical triad of localized spine pain, fever, and progressive neurological deficit is seen, however, in only 36% of patients with epidural abscess.
Spinal tuberculosis has a similar presentation to bacterial osteomyelitis, with most presenting with spine pain and localized tenderness. Unlike bac­terial osteomyelitis, however, patients with tuberculosis present with a more insidious course. A mean duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis is 6.1 months. neurological deficits at the time of presentation are also more prev­alent with tuberculosis, with 44.9% of patients having neurological findings. Motor function abnormalities are present in 34.6% of patients with spinal tuberculosis, with 6.4% being paraplegic at time of presentation.

DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION

The initial evaluation of a patient suspected of spinal infection includes standard serologic markers for infection or inflammation. A basic panel includes peripheral white blood cell count (WBC), erythrocyte sedimenta­tion rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP). WBC is elevated at time of presentation, however, in only 42% of cases, and often normalizes in patients with chronic infection. ESR and CRP are markers of inflammation and demonstrate high sensitivity for spinal infection. CRP, an acute phase protein, increases within 4 to 6 hours of infection. ESR begins to increase only several days after the onset of infection and peaks at 7 to 8 days. ESR is elevated in over 90% of patients with spinal infection; however, ESR and CRP lack specificity, and may be increased in patients either with infection or with other inflammatory disorders. Individuals suspected of tuberculosis are assessed with a PPD and subsequently sputum staining for acid-fast bacilli.
Definitive diagnosis of spinal infection is made upon identifying the causative organism from positive culture. Prompt blood and urine cultures are obtained immediately on presentation, as infection commonly spreads to the spine either from the genitourinary tract or hematogenously. Positive blood cultures identify the inciting organism in 25% to 59% of cases. Ideally, cultures are obtained prior to initiating antimicrobial therapy to obviate the potential of a sterile nondiagnostic culture.
Biopsy of an abnormal spinal lesion can confirm the diagnosis of infec­tion as well as isolate the inciting organism. Percutaneous closed biopsy is performed using computed tomography (CT) or fluoroscopic guidance. Closed biopsy demonstrates a reported accuracy of 70% to 100% in iden­tifying the causative organism. Open surgical biopsy is indicated in the set­ting of a nondiagnostic closed biopsy in a patient with persistent clinical infection or deterioration despite broad-spectrum medical therapy, or for lesions inaccessible percutaneously. Open biopsy is diagnostic in over 80% of patients, likely due to a larger bony sample. A high concordance rate is observed in patients with both positive blood and biopsy specimens, rein­forcing the importance of early blood culture sampling prior to initiating antimicrobial pharmacotherapy.
Imaging
Plain spine x-rays may demonstrate characteristic findings associated with osteomyelitis or osteodiscitis, and often serve as a rapid method for survey­ing the full spinal axis for potential infection. Disc space narrowing is the earliest and most consistent radiographic finding, occurring in 74% of cases, generally after approximately 2 to 4 weeks. Enlargement of the paravertebral shadow may indirectly suggest a thoracic paravertebral abscess. After 3 to 6 weeks, leukocyte infiltration into the subchondral bone and vertebral body leads to bony destructive changes, appearing as a lytic area in the anterior aspect of the vertebral body adjacent to the disc, or blurring of the endplates. With advanced bone loss, the vertebral body collapses. Thirty-six inch standing x-rays are essential for assessing progression of sagittal and coronal plane deformity in severe cases. With chronic disease (after 8 to 12 weeks), reactive bone formation and endplate sclerosis occurs. Ultimately, the reparative process results in new bone formation and hypertrophic changes.
304
P A R T V I Other Surgical Treatment Modalities: Thoracic Spine
Eventually, 50% of cases lead to spontaneous fusion; however, it may require several years for this to take place. The remaining cases likely form a fibrous ankylosis which may similarly effectively immobilize the involved segment.
Radionuclide studies are capable of detecting and localizing infection before abnormal findings are observed on plain radiographs. Gallium scan­ning demonstrates 89% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 86% accuracy for diagnosing disc space infections. Technetium scanning is 90% sensitive, 78% specific, and 94% accurate. Combined gallium and technetium scanning is reported to have 94% accuracy. SPECT is a sensitive bone scintigraphic modality for early detection of osteomyelitis and is often performed in con­junction with technetium and gallium scanning.
CT imaging is beneficial for evaluating the extent of bony destruction. Axial CT imaging demonstrates the presence of retropulsed fragments and the degree of canal compromise in the setting of pathologic fracture. Sagit­tal reconstructed CT imaging may reveal endplate osteopenia as an early finding of infection. Superb detailing of bony anatomy may be useful for preoperative planning in cases necessitating surgical intervention. Also, CT imaging can delineate adjacent soft tissue abscess or granulation tissue that may require operative debridement.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for radiologic evaluation of spinal infection. MRI demonstrates high sensitivity (96%), specificity (92%), and accuracy (94%). Intravenous gadolinium further delineates areas of abnormal enhancement and facilitates localization of infection to the vertebral body, intervertebral disc, or epidural space. Opti­mal visualization of the neural elements allows for evaluation of canal com­promise or spinal cord compression. MRI is readily capable of delineating paravertebral abscesses. Multiplanar imaging allows for full evaluation of the complete spinal column in sagittal and axial planes to assess for the extent of involvement.

MANAGEMENT

Management of spinal infections has dramatically evolved over the last sev­eral decades. Advances in imaging allow for prompt diagnosis with initia­tion of appropriate antimicrobial pharmacotherapy, often early in the clinical course. Improved surgical technique combined with developments in spinal instrumentation has resulted in decreased surgical morbidity and better long-term clinical outcomes. The general principles of treatment for spinal infections, regardless of medical or surgical intervention, are fundamentally the same. The primary objectives are to eradicate infection, preserve neuro­logical function, maintain spinal alignment, and prevent pain.
Medical Therapy
Medical therapy for spinal infection consists primarily of antimicrobial phar­macotherapy. Most patients with vertebral osteomyelitis respond successfully to nonsurgical treatment. The main tenet of medical therapy is identifica­tion of the inciting organism with either a positive blood or biopsy specimen, and initiation of an appropriate antimicrobial agent. The selection of either a single or multi-drug regimen is dictated by the virulence and resistance of the causative organism. Therefore, optimal treatment is entirely dependent on isolating an organism. As a result, antimicrobial treatment is withheld in patients that are neurologicalally and clinical stable until definitive cultures are obtained. Patients presenting with sepsis or progressive deterioration may necessitate empirical broad-spectrum coverage until an organism is identified.
Antimicrobial therapy is generally delivered parenterally for a minimum of 6 weeks. A 25% failure rate is observed in patients treated with antibiot­ics for less than 4 weeks. Serial serologic evaluation of ESR is an effective measure of therapeutic response. After 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics, some advocate continuing oral therapy until the ESR has diminished by a minimum of one half the pretreatment level to prevent relapse. A two­thirds reduction in ESR from pretreatment levels is an indication of com­plete eradication of infection. In addition to antimicrobial pharmacotherapy, immobilization with an external orthosis is recommended for patients with severe pain, greater than 50% vertebral height loss, or involvement of the thoracolumbar junction.
Medical treatment for spinal tuberculosis is primarily reserved for patients without any neurological involvement. The Medical Research Council Committee for Research on Tuberculosis in the Tropics concluded
that treatment for spinal tuberculosis in developing countries consists of ambulatory pharmacotherapy with 6- or 9-month regimens of isoniazid or rifampin. In Western countries, drug therapy for spinal tuberculosis is 6 months of isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide. Others advocate a more aggressive approach to spinal tuberculosis with 12 months of treatment, beginning with isoniazid, ethambutol, rifampin, and pyrazinamide for the first 2 months, followed by tailoring of the therapy based on sensitivities. Multimodal therapy is often necessary due to potential drug resistance, as well as the decreased accessibility of certain agents to different involved organ systems. Unfortunately, many of these agents have potential side effects, with the risk of liver failure among the more clinically significant.
Indications for Surgical Intervention
There are several indications for surgical intervention for spinal infection.
Open surgical biopsy to determine the bacteriologic diagnosis is recom­mended in patients with nondiagnostic cultures or closed biopsy. Patients in sepsis refractory to medical treatment may require abscess drainage or debridement of necrotic tissue to facilitate penetration of antimicrobial therapy to sites of active infection. Individuals presenting with acute neu­rological deficit resulting from spinal cord compression require emergent decompression. Delaying surgical intervention in neurologicalally compro­mised patients may be cautiously reserved in those who are too significantly medically compromised to undergo surgery, and those who present with over 72 hours of neurological deficit. Chronic pain and significant deformity are relative indications for surgical intervention.
Patients with spinal tuberculosis and neurological deficit generally are require radical debridement with bone grafting and stabilization. There are data to suggest that patients with tuberculosis and mild neurological deficits may respond to medical therapy alone. In a study of 200 cases of patients with spinal tuberculosis and neurological impairment, 38% of patients recovered with only medical therapy. Sixty-two percent, however, ultimately required surgery, with 69% of surgically treated patients having a complete neurological recovery. A direct correlation between duration of neurological symptoms prior to surgery and time for recovery from paraplegia supports early operative intervention in patients with neurological impairment. With prompt surgical treatment, better neurological outcomes and prevention of deformity can be expected.
Surgical Management
Several important issues require consideration once it is determined that a patient requires surgical intervention. The primary issue is deciding upon an appropriate surgical approach and fusion technique, from a broad spec­trum of operative modalities previously described. Anterior approaches include anterior debridement and fusion with or without instrumentation. Posterior approaches involve a posterior decompression, debridement, and instrumented fusion. Circumferential approaches include anterior debride­ment with strut grafting and instrumentation with posterior supplemental fixation in a single-stage or delayed fashion. Ultimately, surgical decision­making is dependent upon whether the primary pathology is ventral, dorsal, or circumferential, and whether the infected tissue requires complete or par­tial debridement. Additional factors include the degree of preexisting defor mity, determining the optimal technique for restoring spinal alignment, and whether spinal reconstruction and stabilization are necessary. Last, given the propensity for significant medical comorbidities in this patient population, serious consideration must be given toward selecting a surgical approach that the patient can tolerate with minimized morbidity.
Timing of surgical intervention is also a critical factor. Patients with acute neurologicalal deficits secondary to spinal cord compression require emer­gent decompression to prevent irreversible injury. Persistent sepsis despite medical therapy, with significant abscesses and infected or necrotic tissue, may necessitate urgent drainage or debridement to decrease the overall infectious burden and facilitate antimicrobial penetration. Acute instability that threatens neurological structures demands immediate immobilization and may require urgent operative stabilization. Delayed surgical interven­tion is indicated for patients that are stable neurologically and clinically, but have disabling pain or evidence of chronic progressive deformity. Generally, in these instances, surgical instrumented stabilization and arthrodesis is performed after the acute infection is cleared.
-