Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6011_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
95 Мб
Скачать
Case 2: Percutaneous Instrumentation
C H A P T E R 4 5     Treatment of oracic Vertebral Fractures
285
An 84-year-old female presented 1 month after she was involved in a motor vehicle accident in which she sustained a T9 Chance fracture (Figure 45-3A). oracic MRI performed hours after the accident showed a spi­nal epidural hematoma at the level of the fracture and an intact posterior ligamentous complex. e patient underwent multilevel thoracic laminec­tomies and evacuation of the epidural hematoma. Subsequent MRI showed
no residual spinal cord compression; however, she had persistent spinal cord injury and was unable to lift the lower extremities against gravity. She also had severe back pain, which limited her mobility and rehabilitation. We opted to perform percutaneous T6-12 instrumentation (Figure 45-3B). Two months later, the patient was tolerating rehabilitation well, and her lower extremity strength was markedly improved.
A B
F IG UR E 4 5- 3A, Preoperative CT demonstrating T9 Chance fracture. Postoperative AP (B) and lateral (C) x-rays showing bilateral T6-8 and T10-12 
pedicle screw and rod fixation.
C
Case 3: Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy
A 57-year-old male presented with progressive myelopathy, including gait disturbance due to spasticity progressing over a 5-year period. Bowel and bladder control had been compromised, and the lower extremities were diffusely weak to resistance. He reported severe paresthesias in his lower extremities. Bilateral Babinski signs and bilateral ankle and knee clonus were present. He also had a palpable nontender gibbus in the upper thoracic spine.
MRI and CT scans revealed severe compression of the ventral spinal cord due to a 30-degree focal kyphotic deformity at the level of T3-T4. A T2 signal change was detected within the spinal cord at the same level, consistent with advanced spinal cord injury (Figure 45-4A and B).
A posterior transpedicular osteotomy was performed using biplane fluoroscopy, which guided the resection of a wedge of the superior T4 vertebra (Figure 45-5A-C). Rib osteotomies were completed at the level of T4, and lateral wall osteotomies with preservation of the pleura were accomplished. After a spontaneous partial reduction of the osteotomy, the
Mayfield head holder was elevated to reduce the gibbus and correct the alignment of the upper thoracic spine. Longitudinal rods were contoured and placed at the level of T1, T2, and T3 after reduction was completed manually, with biplane fluoroscopy and intraoperative evoked potentials, by closing the bony defect created by the vertebral osteotomy (Figure 45-5 C-D). e longitudinal rods were placed into a reduced position, achiev­ing complete reduction of the kyphotic and sagittal plane deformity and annihilating the gibbus deformity (Figure 45-5E). Biplane fluoroscopy confirmed alignment of the sagittal and coronal plane at the instrumented levels with complete resolution of the gibbus, and evoked potentials remained unchanged (Figure 45-5E and F).
Two days after the surgery, the patient was transferred from the intensive care unit to the floor, where he quickly recuperated his baseline strength and was discharged home ambulating independently with the use of a cane. Postoperative CT scans confirmed the established correction of the sagittal plane deformity (Figure 45-6A and B).
286
P A R T V I Other Surgical Treatment Modalities: Thoracic Spine
H
30°
A B
F IG UR E 4 5 -4 A,  T2-weighted  MRI  sequence  sagittal  view,  showing  the  ventral  spinal  cord  compression  and 
stretching resulting  from the posttraumatic focal  kyphosis at the level  of T4. At the  T4  level, the spinal  cord  is markedly  atrophied and shows a significantly increased signal consistent with spinal cord injury. B, Sagittal thoracic CT scan showing  a healed compression fracture at T4 the level with a resultant focal kyphosis of approximately 30 degrees.
T4
T4
A
T4
D
F IG UR E 4 5- 5A, Intraoperative fluoroscopy showing placement of bilateral 5.5-mm and 6.5-mm pedicle screws from T1 to T10. The inferior part 
of the spinous process and laminae of T3  are  resected, as well as the inferior facets of T3 bilaterally. The superior facets of T4 and the pedicles of  T4 are  resected, creating a giant foramen containing both T3 and T4 nerve roots. Rib heads at the level of T4 are osteomized along with the transverse processes.  B, Under fluoroscopic guidance, a wedge of the vertebral body of T4 is removed with different sizes of curettes and an electric drill. Rongeurs are used to  osteomize the lateral edges of the vertebral body. C, Placement of the contoured rods at T1, T2, and T3 allows manual reduction of the focal kyphosis  at  the level of T3 with the guidance of biplane fluoroscopy and intraoperative evoked potentials (D) by closing the bony defect created by the vertebral oste­otomy. E, The longitudinal rods were placed into a reduced position, where a complete reduction of the kyphotic and sagittal plane deformity was achieved,  annihilating the gibbus deformity and closing the bony wedge defect created by the PSO. F, Biplane fluoroscopy confirmed alignment of the coronal plane  at the instrumented levels.
B
T4
E
C
T4
F
C H A P T E R 4 5     Treatment of oracic Vertebral Fractures
30°
T4
T4
A B
F IG UR E 4 5 -6   A,  Preoperative  sagittal  CT  scan  of  the  thoracic  spine  showing  the  wedge  resection  planning. 
B, Postoperative sagittal CT scan of the thoracic spine showing the “closing” of the wedge resected by the PSO, and sub-
sequent “shortening” of the spine at T4.
287
provide structural support to the vertebral body. A smaller amount of PMMA is then injected through the same channel around the PEEK con­struct, as compared to both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. The StaXx kyphoplasty system potentially offers an advantage over kyphoplasty alone, in which the space opened by the balloon may undergo some collapse before the PMMA is injected. In vertebroplasty, the PMMA simply flows to the spaces of least resistance, but does not offer height restoration.
Thoracic Stabilization
Surgical approaches for the treatment of unstable thoracic vertebral fractures include anterior, posterior, and combined anterior and posterior stabilization methods. Minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screws may be placed if the fracture involves mostly bony elements and the ligaments are intact. If ligamen­tous injury is present, pedicle screw placement with joint arthrodesis is advised.
Spinal Cord or Nerve Decompression
Thoracic vertebral fractures associated with cord or nerve compression require decompression. Spinal cord decompression may be accomplished with laminectomy alone (when the compressive pathology is dorsal to the cord), although removal of a bone fragment ventral to the spinal cord may be neces­sary. This can be done from a posterior approach using a facet-sparing trans­pedicular approach or a far lateral approach. If the bone fragment compressing the spinal cord is in a central and ventral location, an anterior approach may then be required. Instrumentation and fusion are generally needed.
Deformity Correction
To treat spinal deformity (kyphosis and/or scoliosis), with or without myelopathic symptoms, several surgical techniques may be used, including pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), Smith-Peterson osteotomy, pedicle screw instrumentation, and arthrodesis. The use of PSO and Smith­Peterson osteotomy in a posterior approach is a good alternative to a com­bined anterior and posterior approach.
The abnormal focal concavity, which results from the kyphotic deformity caused by a compression fracture, stretches the spinal cord. The spinal cord moves ventrally in an attempt to minimize the stretching effect. Myelopathic deficits ensue once the ventral compression becomes significant, requiring ventral compression of the bony elements and removal of the upper thoracic concavity to reestablish the normal three-dimensional conformation of the spinal cord. The distinct anatomy of the upper thoracic spine renders the spinal cord more vulnerable to ventral compression.
Anterior approaches to treat a spinal deformity can also be performed. However, any multisegment anterior fusion construct is subject to sustain­ing increased mechanical stress, which can thereby result in the failure of
the anterior spinal fusion.3 In addition, the upper thoracic spine is a difficult region to access anteriorly due to the presence of major vascular elements as well as vital structures ventral to the spine.
2
Moreover, Boockvar et al reported that anterior reconstruction alone might not meet the biomechanical needs of the upper thoracic spine. Recent advances in anesthesia, neural monitoring, and posterior instrumentation have made a posterior approach to the upper thoracic spine possible and treatment of the upper thoracic spine achievable.
In some cases, PSO may be safely used to correct abnormal severe focal kyphotic deformities, which result in spinal cord stretching and ventral compression, because it allows for significant correction through one spinal segment by shortening the spinal column and reestablishing sagittal align­ment. When PSO is performed, instrumented fusions are usually necessary, and dural buckling needs to be ruled out with thoracic laminectomies at the osteotomy sites.

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION

The management of thoracic fractures is challenging because of the com­plex anatomic variations in this region. In addition, most spinal surgeons are less comfortable with dealing with the thoracic area than with the cervical vor lumbar regions. Nevertheless, with current technical and technologic advances, the spinal surgeon is equipped with a wide variety of available resources and methods to treat thoracic fractures according to severity, pre­senting symptoms, and impact on patient function.

References

1. K. Abumi, Y. Shono, M. Ito, H. Taneichi, Y. Kotani, K. Kaneda, Complications of pedicle
screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine, Spine 25 (2000) 962–969.
2. J.A. Boockvar, M.F. Philips, A.E. Telfeian, D.M. O’Rourke, P.J. Marcotte, Results and risk fac-
tors for anterior cervicothoracic junction surgery, J. Neurosurg. 94 (2001) 12–17.
3. H.F. Defino, A.E. Rodriquez-Fuentes, F.P. Piola, Surgical treatment of pathological kyphosis
[in Spanish], Acta Ortoped. Bras. 10 (2002) 10–16.
4. S.D. Gertzbein, Scoliosis Research Society: multicenter spine fracture study, Spine 17 (1992)
528.
5. J.Y. Lee, A.R. Vacarro, M.R. Lim, et al., Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score:
a new paradigm for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine trauma, J. Orthop. Sci. 10 (2005) 671–675.
6. I.H. Lieberman, S. Dudeney, M.K. Reinhardt, et al., Initial outcome and efficacy of “kypho-
plasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, Spine 26 (2001) 1631–1638.
7. F. Magerl, M. Aebi, S.D. Gertzbein, et al., A comprehensive classificaton of thoracic and lum-
bar injuries,, Eur. Spine J. 3 (1994) 184–201.
8. J.B. Martin, B. Jean, K. Sugui, et al., Vertebroplasty: clinical experience and follow-up results,
Bone 25 (1999) 11S–15S.
9. M.M. Panjabi, K. Takata, V. Goal, et al., Thoracic human vertebrae: quantitative three-
dimensional anatomy, Spine 26 (1991) 888–901.
1
Tumors of the Thoracic Spine
Timothy F. Witham, Vivek A. Mehta, and Ziya L. Gokaslan
46
k e y p o i n t s
Surgical decompression followed by radiotherapy has replaced radiotherapy
alone as the gold standard for treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer.
Tumor histology, location, and anterior column compromise should dictate
the surgical approach.
Anterior, posterior, combined, or en bloc approaches should be considered
in a disease-directed fashion for the treatment of thoracic spinal column neoplasms.
Instability must be considered, particularly when there is anterior column
compromise.
e clinical goals of surgical intervention should be local disease control,
preservation or restoration of neurological function, stabilization of the spinal column, and pain control.

INTRODUCTION

Nearly 1.4 million new cases of cancer are diagnosed in the United States
1
per year. per year, patients ultimately succumb to complications related to metastatic disease. Approximately 30% to 90% of cancer patients will have evidence of metastases to the spinal column at autopsy, and 5% to 10% of cancer patients develop symptomatic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), an oncologic emergency. of symptomatic MESCC in the united states each year. is the most common site of metastatic disease involvement in the vertebral column and the most common site of primary vertebral column tumors. Because symptomatic degenerative disease is less common in the thoracic spine relative to the cervical or lumbar spine, thoracic region pain in a middle-aged or elderly patient should be considered a red flag symptom. Imaging should be considered expeditiously, particularly if the patient has a history of primary cancer. Nonetheless, delay in the diagnosis of thoracic region tumors is common. Surgical intervention for thoracic spinal cord and spinal column neoplasms continues to present significant challenges. Lesions in the thoracic spine can be subdivided into four major categories: metastatic disease, intradural extramedullary tumors, intramedullary spinal cord tumors, and primary neoplasms involving skeletal elements.
In a majority of the approximately 724,000 cancer-related deaths
1
There are approximately 25,000 cases
1
The thoracic spine

Metastatic Tumors

Approximately 70% of metastatic disease to the vertebral column involves
the thoracic spine, making it the most common site of spinal metastases. As increased survival due to improved treatment strategies for primary neoplasms becomes a trend, the incidence of bone metastases to the spine will also increase. The unique venous drainage of visceral organs through the Batson plexus is one explanation for this anatomical phenomenon, along with the close proximity of the thoracic spine to thoracic and abdominal
2
viscera.
Eighty percent of metastases involve the vertebral body, while 20%
involve the posterior elements.
2
Of the four subtypes of tumors of the tho-
288
racic spine, metastatic tumors are by far the most common. Cancers that have a propensity to spread to the thoracic spine include breast, lung, leu­kemia/lymphoma, prostate, and renal cell. consideration of the need for decompression of the neural elements, for res­toration of spinal stability, and for pain relief. With tumors of breast, pros­tate, or renal origin, aggressive resection is indicated, as this has been shown to have a favorable impact on ambulatory function and may have a favorable impact on survival.
3
2
Surgical management requires

Intradural Extramedullary Tumors

Intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumors account for two thirds of intra­dural spinal tumors. spine are meningiomas, neurofibromas and schwannomas, which account for over 80% of tumors in this location. noid cap cells; 75% of spinal meningiomas are contained within the thoracic spine, and they show a strong predilection for women (80%). have a benign biological behavior in the spinal column and management should be directed toward gross total resection to achieve a cure. This may not be feasible with anteriorly situated, calcified tumors, and the risk of neu­rological injury must be weighed against the indolent growth rates usually observed after subtotal resection. Radiotherapy is thus reserved for recur­rent tumors that cannot be completely resected.
Schwannomas arise from Schwann cells of the posterior nerve roots and are most common in the thoracic and upper lumbar spine. The location, in 13% of cases, may be both extradural and intradural. Spinal schwannomas have an increased frequency in certain genetic disorders, such as neurofibro­matosis type 2 (NF2).
Neurofibromas of spinal nerve root origin may be seen sporadically or in patients with neurofibromatosis. These tumors will have an extradural compo­nent in 30% of cases. mas and neurofibromas is complete surgical resection. If the tumor cannot be separated from the nerve root of origin, then sacrifice of that root may be necessary. Fortunately, this is usually of little consequence in the thoracic spine.
IDEM tumors of the thoracic spine most often manifest with long tract signs, and the corticospinal tracts are particularly vulnerable. Stiffness and muscle fatigue are often primary signs with spasticity frequently occurring secondarily. In patients presenting with myelopathy, surgical indications are straightforward. It is the incidentally found meningioma or nerve sheath tumor that may present a dilemma. Patient age, medical comorbidities, and tumor growth observed with serial imaging help direct the necessity and timing of surgical intervention.

Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors

2
Intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) make up 2% to 8.5% of all cen­tral nervous system(CNS) tumors and approximately one third of primary spinal column tumors. types observed in the thoracic spine are astrocytomas and ependymomas, which are seen with almost equal frequency in adults. Hemangioblastomas, which are less commonly observed, may be sporadic or a part of von Hippel­Lindau syndrome. Astrocytomas are most often seen at the cervicothoracic
4
The most common IDEM tumors of the thoracic
5
Meningiomas arise from arach-
5
Meningiomas
5
The surgical goal in the treatment of thoracic schwanno-
6
Approximately 90% are of glial origin.4 The major
C H A P T E R 4 6 Tumors of the oracic Spine
289
junction and in the lower thoracic spinal cord. In adults, ependymomas are the most common IMSCT. However, the majority of these occur in the cer­vical spine or arise from the filum terminale (myxopapillary ependymoma). Treatment of ependymomas is focused on gross total resection. Patients who have incompletely-removed tumors should be considered for re-resection or followed closely with serial imaging and considered for reoperation if growth is documented. Radiation therapy is often reserved for incomplete resection after reoperation. Astrocytomas in adults tend to be infiltrative and blend imper­ceptibly with the spinal cord at the margins of the tumor. For this reason, total removal may not be possible. Most commonly, infiltrative tumors treated with subtotal resection will undergo radiation therapy. For high-grade infiltrative lesions, biopsy or subtotal resection is also often followed by radiation therapy. For some low-grade lesions treated with subtotal resection, postoperative radi­ation therapy remains controversial.
6
Pain is the most common presentation of IMSCT in the thoracic spine; it usually localizes to the level of the tumor and is either regional back pain or radicular.
4
Up to one third of patients may also experience sensory or motor complaints and spasticity. The most common sign of an IMSCT within the thoracic spine is a mild scoliosis with spasticity and sensory dis­turbance.
6
Until recently, it was believed that posterior decompression and radiation therapy were the limits of therapy, but aggressive gross total resec­tion, with the aid of microsurgical tools and intraoperative monitoring, has been shown to be safe and to improve functional recovery and reduce tumor recurrence.

Primary Vertebral Column Tumors

Primary tumors of the vertebral column are rare, making up less than 10% of all tumors involving the spinal column. patients present with a vertebral column mass in the absence of impending neurological compromise, minimally invasive, image-guided biopsy should be performed prior to definitive treatment planning. Many of the primary neo­plasms of the thoracic spinal column are best treated via radical en bloc surgi­cal resection. These types of surgical approaches require careful and detailed preoperative surgical planning by an experienced surgical team. Therefore, knowing the tumor histology up front is critical to the surgical plan.
Primary osseous tumors can be divided into three categories: benign, benign but locally aggressive, and malignant. Benign tumors include hem­angiomas, osteoid osteomas/osteoblastomas, chondroma/osteochondro­mas, aneurysmal bone cysts, and eosinophilic granulomas. Hemangiomas are the most common primary neoplasm affecting the thoracic spine and have been seen in approximately 11% of all postmortem examinations. Infrequently, hemangiomas can behave in an atypical or locally aggressive fashion and can cause spinal cord compression. In this situation, aggressive surgical resection is advocated. Giant cell tumors have a variable biological behavior and may act in a locally aggressive fashion. Because of this, the authors often recommend radical en bloc excision of tumors exhibiting this pathology and will strongly consider adjuvant radiation therapy postop­eratively. Chordomas occurring in the thoracic spine are almost uniformly locally aggressive and recurrences are common after intralesional resection, including gross total resection. Similarly, we recommend radical en bloc resection techniques for thoracic chordomas. Chemotherapy protocols for chordomas have not been promising to date, nor have conventional radia­tion therapy modalities. Proton beam irradiation therapy has been shown to be the most promising radiation modality and patients are evaluated postoperatively for this modality on an individual basis. However, it is our belief that the most effective treatment modality for achieving long term local disease control is aggressive en bloc resection with negative margins, including resection of the biopsy tract if possible. Proton beam irradia­tion should not be relied on for cases where gross total resection cannot be achieved. However, it may be employed even in cases of en bloc resection with negative margins.
Malignant types include plasmacytomas, chondrosarcomas, and osteo­sarcomas. Plasmacytomas make up nearly 30% of all primary tumors and have a propensity to occur in the thoracic spine. radiation-sensitive lesions, surgery may be necessary for failure of radiation therapy, acute neurological decline from spinal cord compression, and overt instability of the spinal column. Sarcomas present a specific treatment chal­lenge. Biopsy is recommended to assess the specific histology and grade.
7
It should be emphasized that when
8
While these tumors are
Systemic workup for metastases is important prior to embarking on treat­ment. High-grade lesions that are large or those tumors associated with metastatic disease may be treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols to shrink the local disease and address metatstatic disease prior to surgical resection. En bloc resection is the technique that gives the patient the best opportunity for a longer-term survival with these tumor types, particularly when metastatic disease is not present.
Thoracic spinal column neoplasms present a host of treatment chal­lenges. Knowing the tumor histology through a biopsy is ideal prior to embarking on a formal surgical plan. In the setting of impending neuro­logical decline, a biopsy may not be possible and urgent decompression may be necessary. However, surgical planning is best determined when the his­tology, systemic disease status, patient age, and medical comorbidities are known.

BASIC SCIENCE

Research related to the molecular biology and genetics of specific tumor types that affect the spinal column either as primary or metastatic lesions is beyond the scope of this text. However, several animal models of spinal column neoplasia and the translational research related to these animal models are worth discussion. Recently, animal models for metastatic disease to the spine and intramedullary spinal cord gliomas have been developed that will allow for more rigorous preclinical analysis of novel therapies. Mantha et al have established a reproducible model of metastatic breast adenocarcinoma to the vertebral column in rats.
9
The establishment of this model represents the first of its kind and has allowed for the study of multiple treatment modali­ties focused on treating spinal metastatic disease, including surgery, radiation therapy, and the novel use of locally delivered chemotherapeutic agents.
Using the metastatic model developed by Mantha et al, Bagley et al have shown that radiation reliably delays paraparesis and death in this model, as does local delivery of paclitaxel.
10,11
The combination of these two modalities has been shown to be more effective than either treatment alone. ally, Gok et al. have shown that the combination of decompressive surgery, local chemotherapy, and radiation has the most profound results in terms of preservation of neurological function and prolongation of survival in this ani­mal model with of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. is that this experimental data may translate into useful clinical trials designed to improve neurological morbidity and, potentially, survival in patients with MESCC due to metastatic breast cancer and other tumor histologies.
7
Pennant et al. have examined the efficacy of microsurgical excision in a rat model of intramedullary spinal cord tumor. The established model mimics the behavior of IMSCTS, both functionally and histopathologically. tumor implantation, animals were randomized into a treatment group (micro­surgical resection) or to no treatment. The animals that underwent resection had a significant delay in the onset of functional paraplegia as compared to the controls and these results were highly reproducible. This new model allows for the study of new treatment options for high-grade intramedullary tumors.
Schuster et al have developed a novel model of spine metastasis using human osteoblasts implanted in immune incompetent (SCID) mice that has shown to be highly reproducible.
14
This model allows for the study of bone­tumor interaction in metastatic disease, as well as the basic biology of bone metastases. Chordoma models have been difficult to establish, but through human cell culture, nude animal models have been conceptualized. Labora­tory study of this extremely aggressive local tumor is much needed given the limited options for treatment outside of aggressive radical resection.

CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES

Surgical intervention has a clear and proven role in the treatment of patients with metastatic disease involving the thoracic spine that results in spinal cord compression. Surgical treatment, followed by radiation therapy, not only extends ambulatory status but also results in a trend toward longer survival and reduces the need for steroids and pain medications.
The indications for surgical intervention include the need to estab­lish a diagnosis, the treatment of spinal instability, and the restoration or preservation of neurological function in the setting of epidural spinal cord compression. Additional indications include the treatment of radioresistant tumors, and the treatment of tumor recurrence following radiation therapy
11
Addition-
12
The hope
13
Following
3
290
P A R T V I Other Surgical Treatment Modalities: Thoracic Spine
or the treatment of neurological decline during radiation therapy. A sys­temic approach for treatment of thoracic metastases has been developed and may aid in designing the optimal surgical strategy.
15
The mnemonic “MAPS” stands for (1) method of resection; (2) anatomy of spinal disease; (3) patient’s level of fitness; and (4) stabilization.
Surgical approaches to the spine can be generally categorized as either anterior, posterior, or combined. Posterior approaches may include lami­nectomy alone, or laminectomy combined with transpedicular, costotrans­versectomy, or lateral extracavitary resection techniques and stabilization. Anterior approaches in the upper thoracic spine include cervicothoracic and trap door exposure. Anterior access to the lower thoracic spine can be accomplished by a thoracotomy or thoracoabdominal approach.
The vascular anatomy is particularly important when designing an anterior approach as well as the tumor laterality. For example, above T6 or T7 a right-sided thoracotomy is preferred, because the aortic arch often complicates a left-sided approach to the mid/upper thoracic spine. Simi­larly, tumors situated between T1 and T4 are a unique challenge from the perspective of an anterior approach. With metastatic lesions in the upper thoracic spine, the authors will often consider a posterior approach. If anterior column resection or reconstruction is necessary, it is often done with a transpedicular, costotransversectomy, or lateral extracavitary technique.
The method of resection may be en bloc (wide or marginal) or intra­lesional resection of various degrees ranging from open biopsy to gross total resection. En bloc resection may be considered with a solitary spinal metastatic lesion, in the absence of visceral metastatic disease and with a favorable histological tumor type (breast, prostate, renal cell carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma). In addition, the feasibility of such an approach should be considered with respect to surgical staging and medical fitness of the patient. En bloc spondylectomy in the thoracic spine may be performed through an all-posterior approach or a combined posterior approach first and a second staged anterior approach. En bloc spondylectomy through a posterior-only approach requires laminectomy above and below the verte­bral segment of interest. Then while protecting the spinal cord and nerve roots, the pedicles are cut at the junction with the vertebral body using a chisel or saw. This allows the posterior elements to be removed in one piece after the facets are disrupted on each side. A wide costotransversectomy is performed on each side to allow for dissection around the entire vertebral body, so that the aorta and venous structures may be dissected off of the spinal column. Radical discectomies are performed above and below the segment of interest to mobilize the entire vertebral body. With the pleura completely exposed, the vertebral body may be rotated, carefully translated
posteriorly around the side of the spinal cord, and resected in one piece. Staged posterior followed by anterior en bloc spondylectomy is similar, but after the radical discectomies, a Silastic sheath is placed between the poste­rior vertebral body and the anterior dura. Subsequent staged thoracotomy is performed to remove the mobilized vertebral segment in one piece. Spe­cial care is taken not to injure the anterior vasculature. The spinal cord is relatively protected with this technique because the Silastic sheath was placed during the first stage to clearly identify the plane between the spinal cord dura and the vertebral body.
The majority of metastases within the thoracic spinal column will affect the vertebral body, which favors an anterior approach. A disease­directed approach to the thoracic spine provides the most direct access for resection of tumors contained within the vertebral body and allows for the most effective reconstruction of the anterior aspects of the weight-bearing spine. A consideration of patient fitness is essential in the choice of sur­gical approach. Previously irradiated tissue increases the risk of wound dehiscence and thus may favor an anterior approach. Additionally, the possibility of high intraoperative blood loss, nutritional depletion, cortico­steroid use, advanced age, comorbidity, and paraparesis are significant risk factors that should be considered.
Though the thoracic spine is well supported by the rib cage, addi­tional stabilization should be considered in the case of significant disease or removal of the vertebral bodies, facet joints or pedicles. Anterior sta­bilization is always indicated following vertebrectomy, and the need for additional posterior stabilization should be considered. Supplementary posterior stabilization following vertebrectomy and vertebral body recon­struction might be considered in a variety of situations, including the case of a posterolateral approach, in patients with a significant kyphosis or deformity, in patients with junctional zone disease, significant adjacent chest wall reconstruction, a greater than two-level corpectomy, spondylec­tomy, or in the case of poor bone quality. The authors do not recommend laminectomy alone for the treatment of thoracic tumors, except in the set­ting of IMSCTs. Often laminoplasty is an attractive option for IMSCTs. Typically with posterior reconstruction for metastatic tumors, we will place pedicle screws two to three levels above and two or three levels below the area of the laminectomy, particularly if a posterior approach is used for anterior column reconstruction.
Finally, metastatic spread from lymphomas, multiple myeloma, and small cell lung carcinoma represent tumors that are particularly radiosensitive; therefore radiation modalities may be considered as a first-line treatment and the need for surgery may be obviated or withheld until radiotherapy has been implemented and failed.

CLINICAL CASE EXAMPLES

Case 1: Posterolateral Approach for Metastatic Spine Disease
PATIENT PRESENTATION
A 70-year-old female with a history of diabetes and osteoarthritis of the hips presented to an outside emergency department with shortness of breath and dyspnea. Work-up included a chest CT scan and an incidental lesion was found in the T3 vertebral body. Formal imaging of the spine was done via a dedicated MRI and CT scan. Initially the lesion was thought to represent metastatic disease. e patient initially had no neurological symp­toms and the lesion was felt to be incidentally found. A systemic metastatic work-up was negative. Given the lack of neurological symptoms despite evi­dence of epidural spinal cord compression on the MRI scan, CT-guided biopsy was recommended. e results were nondiagnostic on two occasions despite thorough review by an experienced neuropathologist. e pathology sample did show rare plasma cells, but serum protein electrophoresis and urine protein electrophoresis were negative. e patient was referred to our institution for further care when she began to develop mild lower extremity weakness, subtle gait difficulty, lower extremity paresthesias, and long tract findings on exam.
MRI of the thoracic spine and CT scan of the thoracic spine are shown in Figure 46-1. We felt that despite the negative biopsy, the imaging was most characteristic of an atypical vertebral hemangioma with epidural
spinal cord compression. Imaging features that support this diagnosis include the appearance of vascular channels on the MRI and the “polka­dot” appearance with vascular channels also present on the CT scan. Also included in the differential diagnosis was plasmacytoma/multiple myeloma.
Because of impending neurological deterioration and the lack of a diag­nosis, a surgical approach was recommended. Given the possibility of a highly vascular lesion such as a vertebral hemangioma, preoperative embo­lization by an interventional neuroradiologist was recommended and suc­cessfully carried out through glue embolization via the right T3 intercostal artery feeding an arteriovenous fistula to the T3 vertebral body and tumor blush. e following day the patient was taken to surgery.
Approaches to this lesion were discussed, with several considerations in mind. First, the epidural compression was noted to occur from an antero­lateral direction at one segment, making an anterior approach appealing. However, at the T3 level, anterior approaches are more complicated and involve splitting the sternum to gain access to this location and working around the great vessels. We recommended a posterolateral approach to allow for decompression, resection of tumor, and both anterior column and posterior reconstruction.
C H A P T E R 4 6 Tumors of the oracic Spine
291
A
C
F I G UR E 4 6- 1 A, Sagittal and B, Axial T2-weighted MRI of the thoracic spine demonstrating a T3 lesion with epidural 
spinal cord compression. Also of note is a lesion at T7 consistent with a typical hemangioma on all sequences. C, Coronal and  CT scan of the thoracic spine demonstrated a “polka-dot” type lesion at T3 with the appearance of vascular channels. This  lesion was felt to be consistent with an atypical hemangioma.
B
D
intralesional resection of the tumor were performed. Reconstruction was achieved with an expandable cage placed from T2 to T4 and supple­mented with pedicle screw instrumentation extending from T1 to T9. An intraoperative photo is shown in Figure 46-2. We elected to extend the construct multiple levels below the site of tumor resection because we did not want to stop our instrumentation just above or at the site of the apex of the thoracic kyphosis for fear of inferior construct failure. Bone graft­ing was performed with allograft and demineralized bone matrix. In the setting of potential malignant disease affecting the bone marrow and with spinal tumor surgery in general, we tend to avoid the use of autograft bone or BMP.
F IG UR E 4 6 -2   Intraoperative  photograph  demonstrating  T2-T4  lami-
nectomies and posterior spinal instrumentation extending from T1-T9.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
With the patient in a prone position on the Jackson table with neurologi­cal monitoring, T2-T4 laminectomies, T3 costotransversectomy, trans­pedicular decompression of the spinal canal, and T3 corpectomy with
POSTOPERATIVE COURSE
e patient tolerated the procedure well and spent one night in the neuro intensive care unit. e patient had no new neurological deficits. Post­operative CT scan demonstrating the cage reconstruction and pedicle screw instrumentation is shown in Figure 46-3. Pathological analysis confirmed the tumor to be a hemangioma. e patient was discharged to rehab and is being followed with serial imaging and clinical evalua­tion to assess for tumor recurrence. However, given the benign nature of the histopathology despite aggressive local behavior, it is suspected that the patient is cured of her disease, and adjuvant therapy has not been recommended.
292
P A R T V I Other Surgical Treatment Modalities: Thoracic Spine
F IG UR E 4 6 -3   Postoperative  sagittal  CT 
scan  and  lateral  scout  view  showing  cage  recon­struction of  T3  and  pedicle  screw  instrumentation  construct.
Case 2: Anterior Approach
PATIENT PRESENTATION
A 61-year-old male with a history of pheochromocytoma presented with progressive midthoracic pain. Nineteen years prior to presentation the patient was diagnosed with a pheochromocytoma and was treated successfully with left adrenalectomy. Six years prior to presentation the patient developed mid­thoracic region pain and was treated conservatively with physical therapy and NSAIDs. e patient developed myelopathic signs and symptoms to include lower extremity weakness and gait dysfunction. And an MRI of the thoracic spine disclosed a lesion at T5 with significant epidural spinal cord compres­sion. He was then treated with radiation therapy and his pain and neurologi­cal dysfunction improved. Several years following the radiation therapy, the patient developed worsening and severe midthoracic pain that had a mechani­cal component to it. Associated symptoms included bilateral thoracic radicu­lar pain and subjective lower extremity weakness. He described dragging his feet, but denied sphincter dysfunction. On exam he had 4/5 strength of the iliopsoas and dorsiflexors bilaterally. He was also noted to be hyperreflexic in his lower extremities. MRI of the thoracic spine (Figure 46-4) showed partial collapse of the T5 vertebral body with kyphosis and epidural spinal cord com­pression. T2 signal change was noted in the spinal cord at this level, consis­tent with myelomalacia. Surgery was recommended, given evidence of spinal cord compression, clinical myelopathy, anterior vertebral column compromise and kyphosis. An all-posterior approach with transpedicular corpectomy and reconstruction of the anterior column was considered. However, it was felt that an anterior approach would be the best approach to resect the anterior compressive tumor, correct the kyphosis, and reconstruct the anterior column without having to perform a multilevel instrumented fusion that would be required with an all-posterior approach.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Given the history of pheochromocytoma, the patient was seen by endocri­nology and anesthesia preoperatively and was premedicated with phenoxy­benzaprine for alpha blockade. Pheochromocytomas are highly vascular tumors and preoperative embolization was also recommended. e right and left T5 intercostal vessels were entered and the tumor was successfully embolized with embospheres. A right-sided, high posterolateral thoracot­omy approach was selected to allow for access to the anterolateral vertebral column, because of the prominence of the aortic arch on the left side. e high posterolateral thoracotomy requires mobilization of the scapula, and in this case, partial resection of the right 5th rib. A T5 corpectomy was performed with opening of the posterior longitudinal ligament for complete decompression of the spinal cord (Figure 46-5). Reconstruction of the ante­rior column was achieved with a distractible cage and plate. Bone grafting was performed using allograft bone. Autograft bone was avoided to limit the rest of metastatic spread of tumor potentially present in the bone marrow of the adjacent rib.
POSTOPERATIVE COURSE
e patient was observed in the neuro intensive care unit overnight. A chest tube was placed at the time of surgery and removed 72 hours postopera­tively. He remained at his baseline neurological exam. He was discharged to home, fully ambulatory, on postoperative day number 8. Postoperative x-rays demonstrated excellent position of the cage and plate (Figure 46-6). At 1-year follow-up the patient had excellent pain control and stable post­operative imaging.
C H A P T E R 4 6 Tumors of the oracic Spine
T7
293
A
B
F IG U R E 4 6- 4A, Sagittal and B, Axial MRI of the thoracic spine demonstrating T5 pheochromocytoma with partial 
anterior column collapse and epidural spinal cord compression with T2 signal change in the spinal cord.
294
P A R T V I Other Surgical Treatment Modalities: Thoracic Spine
F IG UR E 4 6- 5   Intraoperative  photograph  demonstrating  right  thoracotomy 
approach, T5 corpectomy with decompression of the  spinal  cord,  and  reconstruction  with  expandable cage and plating from T4-T6.
A
F IG UR E 4 6- 6  Postoperative AP and lateral thoracic spine x-rays demonstrating stable position of the cage and plate.
Case 3: Anterior/-Posterior Combined Approach
PATIENT PRESENTATION
A 52-year-old male with a history of hypertension presented with a 1-year history of progressive right-sided abdominal and flank region pain. His pain subsequently progressed to include axial back pain that was most severe at night when recumbent in bed. A CT scan (Figure 46-7) of the thoracic spine revealed a lytic/destructive lesion at T9-T10 with associ­ated large paraspinal posterior pleural-based mass on the right side. MRI (Figure 46-8) disclosed significant epidural extension and spinal cord com­pression. e patient denied lower extremity sensory changes, weakness, or bowel or bladder dysfunction. He had no history of systemic cancer. Neurological exam was significant for 5/5 strength in his lower extremi­ties, and a normal sensory exam except for dermatomal sensory loss in the right T9-T10 location. He was also noted to have hyperreflexia in his lower extremities and two to three beats of bilateral ankle clonus. Given the prolonged history, it was felt that this lesion might represent a rela­tively slow-growing histopathological entity. Considerations were sarcoma,
B
plasmacytoma/multiple myeloma, and possibly metastatic carcinoma. Given his preserved motor function, an expedited CT-guided biopsy of the lesion was recommended. e pathology proved the lesion to be a plas­macytoma/multiple myeloma. Further staging disclosed this to be stage 1A IgG kappa multiple myeloma. Despite the lytic appearance of this tumor, the patient initially did not have mechanical pain and the anterior column height was preserved without pathological fracture or deformity. Given the high radiation sensitivity of multiple myeloma, radiation therapy was recommended with close follow-up. e patient failed to respond to radiation therapy and developed mild gait dysfunction. Surgical resection was recommended. e lack of response to radiation called into question the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Concomitant thoracotomy and pos­terior approach was planned. In any situation when an anterior approach is planned and a greater than 1 level corpectomy is performed, we recom­mend supplemental posterior stabilization. In this case, we felt as well that a combined posterior approach would also assist with the tumor resection and decompression.