Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 911 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
8 Мб
Скачать
96
Hypothalamus
Hypothalamus
Physiological situation Primary adrenal insufficiency
Pituitary disease Hypothalamic disease
https://t.me/medicina_free
Hypothalamus
CRH
Pituitary
ACTH
Adrenal
Secondary adrenal insufficiency
CRH
Pituitary
ACTH
Adrenal
CRH
Pituitary
ACTH
Adrenal
Cortisol
Hypothalamus
Pituitary
Adrenal
Cortisol Cortisol
Cortisol
CRH
ACTH
Figure11.3 Primar y and secondary adrenal insufciency.
CRH=corticotropin- releasing hormone SOURCE:Reprinted
from The Lancet 2003 May 31;361(9372):1881- 93. Arlt W, Allolio
B.:Adrenal insufciency, with permission from Elsevier
cause of shock? Describe clinical signs that would lead you to diagnose distributiveshock.
3. How do hepatitis C and the potential for hepatic cirrhosis aect the presentation and course of septic shock? Does this aect your choice of intervention and choice of rst- line antibiotics?
4. What further testing would you initiate before starting treatment of this patient? How would you assess the adequacy of perfusion? Would you place a central venous catheter and/ or arterial catheter?Why?
5. How would you monitor the success of uid resuscitation? Central venous pressure? Central venous oxygenation? Arterial lactate concentrations? Urine output? How does hepatic cirrhosis aect these variables?
6. e patient remains hypotensive with low urine output 2 hours aer uid administration. What is your dierential diagnosis at this time? Does the presence of hepatic cirrhosis aect the responsiveness to resuscitation? What vasopressor would you start, andwhen?
7. How do you assess whether the liver function is adequate? Can we rule out signicant liver dysfunction if the conventional liver function tests are normal? How does cirrhosis aect outcome in patients with sepsis?
REFERENCES
1. Weil MH, Shubin H. Proposed reclassication of shock states with
special reference to distributive defects. Advances in experimental medicine and biology 1971;23:13–23.
2. Bamberger DM, Gurley MB. Microbial etiology and clinical char-
acteristics of distributive shock. Clinical infectious diseases : an ocial publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 1994;18:726–30.
3. Adrian ED, Bronk DW, Phillips G. Discharges in mammalian sym-
pathetic nerves. e Journal of physiology 1932;74:115–33.
4. Rothe CF. Reex control of veins and vascular capacitance.
Physiological reviews 1983;63:1281–342.
5. Greenway CV, Lautt WW. Blood volume, the venous system, pre-
load, and cardiac output. Canadian journal of physiology and phar­macology 1986;64:383–7.
6. Shibamoto T, Cui S, Ruan Z, Liu W, Takano H, Kurata Y. Hepatic
venoconstriction is involved in anaphylactic hypotension in rats.
96 PART III.SHOCK
https://t.me/medicina_free
97
American journal of physiology Heart and circulatory physiology 2005;289:H1436–41.
7. Liu W, Takano H, Shibamoto T, etal. Involvement of splanchnic vascular bed in anaphylactic hypotension in anesthetized BALB/ c mice. American journal of physiology Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology 2007;293:R1947–53.
8. Gershengorn HB, Wunsch H. Understanding changes in established practice: pulmonary artery catheter use in critically ill patients. Critical care medicine 2013;41:2667–76.
9. Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, et al. Assessment of the clini­cal eectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC- Man):a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;366:472–7.
10. Binanay C, Cali RM, Hasselblad V, etal. Evaluation study of con­gestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization eective­ness:the ESCAPE trial. Jama 2005;294:1625–33.
11. Richard C, Warszawski J, Anguel N, etal. Early use of the pulmo­nary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome:a randomized controlled trial. Jama 2003;290:2713–20.
12. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict uid responsiveness? Asystematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008;134:172–8.
13. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict uid responsiveness? An updated meta- analysis and a plea for some common sense. Critical care medicine 2013;41:1774–81.
14. Sakka SG, Bredle DL, Reinhart K, Meier- Hellmann A. Comparison between intrathoracic blood volume and cardiac lling pressures in the early phase of hemodynamic instability of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Journal of critical care 1999;14:78–83.
15. Lichtwarck- Ascho M, Zeravik J, Pfeier UJ. Intrathoracic blood volume accurately reects circulatory volume status in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Intensive care medicine 1992;18:142–7.
16. Lichtwarck- Ascho M, Beale R, Pfeier UJ. Central venous pres­sure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, intrathoracic blood volume, and right ventricular end- diastolic volume as indicators of cardiac preload. Journal of critical care 1996;11:180–8.
17. Gelman S. Venous function and central venous pressure:a physi­ologic story. Anesthesiology 2008;108:735–48.
18. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA. Fluid resus­citation in septic shock:a positive uid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Critical care medicine 2011;39:259–65.
19. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide uid therapy. Annals of intensive care 2011;1:1.
20. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, etal. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and uid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. American journal of respira­tory and critical care medicine 2000;162:134–8.
21. Charron C, Caille V, Jardin F, Vieillard- Baron A. Echocardiographic measurement of uid responsiveness. Current opinion in critical care 2006;12:249–54.
22. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, etal. Passive leg raising predicts uid responsiveness in the critically ill. Critical care medicine 2006;34:1402–7.
23. Vieillard- Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, etal. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive care medicine 2004;30:1734–9.
24. Mizock BA, Falk JL. Lactic acidosis in critical illness. Critical care medicine 1992;20:80–93.
25. Weil MH, A AA. Experimental and clinical studies on lactate and pyruvate as indicators of the severity of acute circulatory failure (shock). Circulation 1970;41:989–1001.
26. Vincent JL, Dufaye P, Berre J, Leeman M, Degaute JP, Kahn RJ. Serial lactate determinations during circulatory shock. Critical care medicine 1983;11:449–51.
27. Arnold RC, Shapiro NI, Jones AE, etal. Multicenter study of early lactate clearance as a determinant of survival in patients with pre­sumed sepsis. Shock 2009;32:35–9.
28. Nguyen HB, Rivers EP, Knoblich BP, etal. Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock. Critical care medicine 2004;32:1637–42.
29. den Uil CA, Klijn E, Lagrand WK, et al. e microcirculation in health and critical disease. Progress in cardiovascular diseases 2008;51:161–70.
30. De Backer D, Creteur J, Preiser JC, Dubois MJ, Vincent JL. Microvascular blood ow is altered in patients with sepsis. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2002;166:98–104.
31. Spanos A, Jhanji S, Vivian- Smith A, Harris T, Pearse RM. Early microvascular changes in sepsis and severe sepsis. Shock 2010;33:387–91.
32. Hiltebrand LB, Krejci V, Banic A, Erni D, Wheatley AM, Sigurdsson GH. Dynamic study of the distribution of microcirculatory blood ow in multiple splanchnic organs in septic shock. Critical care medicine 2000;28:3233–41.
33. Landow L, Andersen LW. Splanchnic ischaemia and its role in multiple organ failure. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1994; 38:626–39.
34. Fiddian- Green RG, Pittenger G, Whitehouse WM, Jr. Back­diusion of CO2 and its inuence on the intramural pH in gastric mucosa. e Journal of surgical research 1982;33:39–48.
35. Creteur J, De Backer D, Vincent JL. Monitoring gastric mucosal carbon dioxide pressure using gas tonometry:in vitro and in vivo validation studies. Anesthesiology 1997;87:504–10.
36. Kirton OC, Windsor J, Wedderburn R, etal. Failure of splanchnic resuscitation in the acutely injured trauma patient correlates with multiple organ system failure and length of stay in the ICU. Chest 1998;113:1064–9.
37. Maynard N, Bihari D, Beale R, etal. Assessment of splanchnic oxy­genation by gastric tonometry in patients with acute circulatory fail­ure. Jama 1993;270:1203–10.
38. Doglio GR, Pusajo JF, Egurrola MA, etal. Gastric mucosal pH as a prognostic index of mortality in critically ill patients. Critical care medicine 1991;19:1037–40.
39. Friedman G, Berlot G, Kahn RJ, Vincent JL. Combined measure­ments of blood lactate concentrations and gastric intramucosal pH in patients with severe sepsis. Critical care medicine 1995;23:1184–93.
40. Chang MC, Cheatham ML, Nelson LD, Rutherford EJ, Morris JA, Jr. Gastric tonometry supplements information provided by systemic indicators of oxygen transport. e Journal of trauma 1994;37:488–94.
41. Leevy CM, Mendenhall CL, Lesko W, Howard MM. Estimation of hepatic blood ow with indocyanine green. e Journal of clinical investigation 1962;41:1169–79.
42. Uusaro A, Ruokonen E, Takala J. Estimation of splanchnic blood ow by the Fick principle in man and problems in the use of indo­cyanine green. Cardiovascular research 1995;30:106–12.
43. Rowell LB, Blackmon JR, Bruce RA. Indocyanine Green Clearance and Estimated Hepatic Blood Flow during Mild to Maximal Exercise in Upright Man. e Journal of clinical investigation 1964;43:1677–90.
44. Hall MJ, Williams SN, DeFrances CJ, Golosinskiy A. Inpatient care for septicemia or sepsis:a challenge for patients and hospitals. NCHS data brief 2011:1–8.
45. Angus DC, Linde- Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiolog y of severe sepsis in the United States:anal­ysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Critical care medicine 2001;29:1303–10.
46. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. e epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. e New England journal of medicine 2003;348:1546–54.
47. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, etal. Denitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. e ACCP/ SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American
DISTRIBUTIVESHOCK 97
98
https://t.me/medicina_free
College of Chest Physicians/ Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992;101:1644–55.
48. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ ESICM/ ACCP/ ATS/ SIS International Sepsis Denitions Conference. Critical care medicine 2003;31:1250–6.
49. Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, etal. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. Jama 2009;302:2323–9.
50. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clinical microbiology reviews 2007;20:133–63.
51. Esper AM, Moss M, Lewis CA, Nisbet R, Mannino DM, Martin GS. e role of infection and comorbidity: Factors that inuence disparities in sepsis. Critical care medicine 2006;34:2576–82.
52. Watson RS, Carcillo JA, Linde- Zwirble WT, Clermont G, Lidicker J, Angus DC. e epidemiology of severe sepsis in children in the United States. American journal of respiratory and critical care med­icine 2003;167:695–701.
53. Hartman ME, Linde- Zwirble WT, Angus DC, Watson RS. Trends in the epidemiology of pediatric severe sepsis*. Pediatric critical care medicine :a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies 2013;14:686–93.
54. Danai PA, Sinha S, Moss M, Haber MJ, Martin GS. Seasonal variation in the epidemiology of sepsis. Critical care medicine 2007;35:410–5.
55. Schulte W, Bernhagen J, Bucala R. Cytokines in sepsis: potent immunoregulators and potential therapeutic targets- - an updated view. Mediators of inammation 2013;2013:165974.
56. Dinarello CA. Proinammatory and anti- inammatory cyto­kines as mediators in the pathogenesis of septic shock. Chest 1997;112:321S- 9S.
57. Selby P, Hobbs S, Viner C, et al. Tumour necrosis factor in man:clinical and biological observations. British journal of cancer 1987;56:803–8.
58. Natanson C, Eichenholz PW, Danner RL, et al. Endotoxin and tumor necrosis factor challenges in dogs simulate the cardiovascular prole of human septic shock. e Journal of experimental medicine 1989;169:823–32.
59. Suter PM, Suter S, Girardin E, Roux- Lombard P, Grau GE, Dayer JM. High bronchoalveolar levels of tumor necrosis factor and its inhibitors, interleukin- 1, interferon, and elastase, in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome aer trauma, shock, or sepsis. e American review of respiratory disease 1992;145:1016–22.
60. Pinsky MR, Vincent JL, Deviere J, Alegre M, Kahn RJ, Dupont E. Serum cytokine levels in human septic shock. Relation to multiple­system organ failure and mortality. Chest 1993;103:565–75.
61. Marks JD, Marks CB, Luce JM, etal. Plasma tumor necrosis factor in patients with septic shock. Mortality rate, incidence of adult respira­tory distress syndrome, and eects of methylprednisolone adminis­tration. e American review of respiratory disease 1990;141:94–7.
62. Damas P, Ledoux D, Nys M, et al. Cytokine serum level during severe sepsis in human IL- 6 as a marker of severity. Annals of surgery 1992;215:356–62.
63. Berg DT, Gupta A, Richardson MA, O’Brien LA, Calnek D, Grinnell BW. Negative regulation of inducible nitric- oxide synthase expression mediated through transforming growth factor- beta­dependent modulation of transcription factor TCF11. e Journal of biological chemistry 2007;282:36837–44.
64. Vodovotz Y, Bogdan C, Paik J, Xie QW, Nathan C. Mechanisms of suppression of macrophage nitric oxide release by transform­ing growth factor beta. e Journal of experimental medicine 1993;178:605–13.
65. Cauwels A. Nitric oxide in shock. Kidney international 2007;72:557–65.
66. Danner RL, Elin RJ, Hosseini JM, Wesley RA, Reilly JM, Parillo JE. Endotoxemia in human septic shock. 1991. Chest 2009;136:e30.
67. Opal SM, Scannon PJ, Vincent JL, et al. Relationship between plasma levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS- binding protein in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. e Journal of infec­tious diseases 1999;180:1584–9.
68. Geller DA, Nussler AK, Di Silvio M, et al. Cytokines, endotoxin, and glucocorticoids regulate the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in hepatocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1993;90:522–6.
69. Annane D, Sanquer S, Sebille V, et al. Compartmentalised inducible nitric- oxide synthase activity in septic shock. Lancet 2000;355:1143–8.
70. Kilbourn RG, Belloni P. Endothelial cell production of nitrogen oxides in response to interferon gamma in combination with tumor necrosis factor, interleukin- 1, or endotoxin. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1990;82:772–6.
71. Landry DW, Oliver JA. e pathogenesis of vasodilatory shock. e New England journal of medicine 2001;345:588–95.
72. Nelson MT, Patlak JB, Worley JF, Standen NB. Calcium channels, potassium channels, and voltage dependence of arterial smooth muscle tone. e American journal of physiology 1990;259:C3–18.
73. Levy B, Collin S, Sennoun N, etal. Vascular hyporesponsiveness to vasopressors in septic shock:from bench to bedside. Intensive care medicine 2010;36:2019–29.
74. Guyenet PG. e sympathetic control of blood pressure. Nature reviews Neuroscience 2006;7:335–46.
75. Landry DW, Levin HR, Gallant EM, et al. Vasopressin de­ciency contributes to the vasodilation of septic shock. Circulation 1997;95:1122–5.
76. Patel BM, Chittock DR, Russell JA, Walley KR. Benecial eects of short- term vasopressin infusion during severe septic shock. Anesthesiology 2002;96:576–82.
77. Landry DW, Levin HR, Gallant EM, et al. Vasopressin pressor hypersensitivity in vasodilatory septic shock. Critical care medicine 1997;25:1279–82.
78. Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J, et al. Vasopressin versus norepi­nephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. e New England journal of medicine 2008;358:877–87.
79. Schrier RW, Wang W. Acute renal failure and sepsis. e New England journal of medicine 2004;351:159–69.
80. Iskander KN, Osuchowski MF, Stearns- Kurosawa DJ, et al. Sepsis:multiple abnormalities, heterogeneous responses, and evolv­ing understanding. Physiological reviews 2013;93:1247–88.
81. Brun- Buisson C, Meshaka P, Pinton P, Vallet B, Group ES. EPISEPSIS: a reappraisal of the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in French intensive care units. Intensive care medicine 2004;30:580–8.
82. Vincent JL, Angus DC, Artigas A, etal. Eects of drotrecogin alfa (activated) on organ dysfunction in the PROWESS trial. Critical care medicine 2003;31:834–40.
83. Nemeth E, Baird AW, O’Farrelly C. Microanatomy of the liver immune system. Seminars in immunopathology 2009;31:333–43.
84. Nesseler N, Launey Y, Aninat C, Morel F, Malledant Y, Seguin P. Clinical review:e liver in sepsis. Critical care 2012;16:235.
85. Minemura M, Tajiri K, Shimizu Y. Liver involvement in systemic infection. World journal of hepatology 2014;6:632–42.
86. Hudson LD, Milberg JA, Anardi D, Maunder RJ. Clinical risks for development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 1995;151:293–301.
87. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, etal. e American- European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Denitions, mechanisms, rel­evant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 1994;149:818–24.
88. Force ADT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, etal. Acute respiratory distress syndrome:the Berlin Denition. Jama 2012;307:2526–33.
89. Stapleton RD, Wang BM, Hudson LD, Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell ES, Steinberg KP. Causes and timing of death in patients with ARDS. Chest 2005;128:525–32.
98 PART III.SHOCK
https://t.me/medicina_free
99
90. Montgomery AB, Stager MA, Carrico CJ, Hudson LD. Causes of mortality in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. e American review of respiratory disease 1985;132:485–9.
91. Zambon M, Vincent JL. Mortality rates for patients with acute lung injury/ ARDS have decreased over time. Chest 2008;133:1120–7.
92. Pugin J, Verghese G, Widmer MC, Matthay MA. e alveolar space is the site of intense inammatory and probrotic reactions in the early phase of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Critical care medicine 1999;27:304–12.
93. Meduri GU, Kohler G, Headley S, Tolley E, Stentz F, Postlethwaite A. Inammatory cytokines in the BAL of patients with ARDS. Persistent elevation over time predicts poor outcome. Chest 1995;108:1303–14.
94. Park WY, Goodman RB, Steinberg KP, et al. Cytokine bal­ance in the lungs of patients with acute respiratory distress syn­drome. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2001;164:1896–903.
95. Meduri GU, Headley S, Kohler G, et al. Persistent elevation of inammatory cytokines predicts a poor outcome in ARDS. Plasma IL- 1 beta and IL- 6 levels are consistent and ecient predictors of outcome over time. Chest 1995;107:1062–73.
96. Weiland JE, Davis WB, Holter JF, Mohammed JR, Dorinsky PM, Gadek JE. Lung neutrophils in the adult respiratory distress syn­drome. Clinical and pathophysiologic signicance. e American review of respiratory disease 1986;133:218–25.
97. Young GB, Bolton CF, Austin TW, Archibald YM, Gonder J, Wells GA. e encephalopathy associated with septic illness. Clinical and investigative medicine Medecine clinique et experi­mentale 1990;13:297–304.
98. Young GB, Bolton CF, Archibald YM, Austin TW, Wells GA. e electroencephalogram in sepsis- associated encephalopathy. Journal of clinical neurophysiology :ocial publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society 1992;9:145–52.
99. Taccone FS, Su F, Pierrakos C, et al. Cerebral microcirculation is impaired during sepsis: an experimental study. Critical care 2010;14:R140.
100. Pster D, Siegemund M, Dell- Kuster S, etal. Cerebral perfusion in sepsis- associated delirium. Critical care 2008;12:R63.
101. Tsao N, Hsu HP, Wu CM, Liu CC, Lei HY. Tumour necrosis factor- alpha causes an increase in blood- brain barrier permeability during sepsis. Journal of medical microbiology 2001;50:812–21.
102. Alexander JJ, Jacob A, Cunningham P, Hensley L, uigg RJ. TNF is a key mediator of septic encephalopathy acting through its receptor, TNF receptor- 1. Neurochemistry international 2008;52:447–56.
103. Basler T, Meier- Hellmann A, Bredle D, Reinhart K. Amino acid imbalance early in septic encephalopathy. Intensive care medicine 2002;28:293–8.
104. Hopkins RO, Jackson JC. Long- term neurocognitive function aer critical illness. Chest 2006;130:869–78.
105. Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, Langa KM. Long- term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. Jama 2010;304:1787–94.
106. MacLean LD, Mulligan WG, McLean AP, Du JH. Patterns of septic shock in man- - a detailed study of 56 patients. Annals of sur­gery 1967;166:543–62.
107. Parker MM, Shelhamer JH, Natanson C, Alling DW, Parrillo JE. Serial cardiovascular variables in survivors and nonsurvivors of human septic shock:heart rate as an early predictor of prognosis. Critical care medicine 1987;15:923–9.
108. Parrillo JE, Parker MM, Natanson C, etal. Septic shock in humans. Advances in the understanding of pathogenesis, cardiovascular dys­function, and therapy. Annals of internal medicine 1990;113:227–42.
109. Parker MM, Shelhamer JH, Bacharach SL, et al. Profound but reversible myocardial depression in patients with septic shock. Annals of internal medicine 1984;100:483–90.
110. Parker MM, McCarthy KE, Ognibene FP, Parrillo JE. Right ventricular dysfunction and dilatation, similar to le ventricu­lar changes, characterize the cardiac depression of septic shock in humans. Chest 1990;97:126–31.
111. Levi M, Schultz M, van der Poll T. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in infectious disease. Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 2010;36:367–77.
112. Gando S, Nanzaki S, Sasaki S, Kemmotsu O. Signicant cor­relations between tissue factor and thrombin markers in trauma and septic patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation. rombosis and haemostasis 1998;79:1111–5.
113. Gando S, Nanzaki S, Sasaki S, Aoi K, Kemmotsu O. Activation of the extrinsic coagulation pathway in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Critical care medicine 1998;26:2005–9.
114. Sabatier F, Roux V, Anfosso F, Camoin L, Sampol J, Dignat- George F. Interaction of endothelial microparticles with monocytic cells in vitro induces tissue factor- dependent procoagulant activity. Blood 2002;99:3962–70.
115. Drake TA, Cheng J, Chang A, Taylor FB, Jr. Expression of tis­sue factor, thrombomodulin, and E- selectin in baboons with lethal Escherichia coli sepsis. e American journal of pathology 1993;142:1458–70.
116. Nawroth PP, Stern DM. Modulation of endothelial cell hemostatic properties by tumor necrosis factor. e Journal of experimental medicine 1986;163:740–5.
117. Faust SN, Levin M, Harrison OB, etal. Dysfunction of endothe­lial protein C activation in severe meningococcal sepsis. e New England journal of medicine 2001;345:408–16.
118. Creasey AA, Reinhart K. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor activity in severe sepsis. Critical care medicine 2001;29:S126–9.
119. Mesters RM, Mannucci PM, Coppola R, Keller T, Ostermann H, Kienast J. Factor VIIa and antithrombin III activity dur­ing severe sepsis and septic shock in neutropenic patients. Blood 1996;88:881–6.
120. Assicot M, Gendrel D, Carsin H, Raymond J, Guilbaud J, Bohuon C. High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection. Lancet 1993;341:515–8.
121. Castelli GP, Pognani C, Meisner M, Stuani A, Bellomi D, Sgarbi L. Procalcitonin and C- reactive protein during systemic inamma­tory response syndrome, sepsis and organ dysfunction. Critical care 2004;8:R234–42.
122. Uzzan B, Cohen R, Nicolas P, Cucherat M, Perret GY. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic test for sepsis in critically ill adults and aer surgery or trauma:a systematic review and meta- analysis. Critical care medicine 2006;34:1996–2003.
123. Tang BM, Eslick GD, Craig JC, McLean AS. Accuracy of pro­calcitonin for sepsis diagnosis in critically ill patients: system­atic review and meta- analysis. e Lancet Infectious diseases 2007;7:210–7.
124. Wacker C, Prkno A, Brunkhorst FM, Schlattmann P. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis:a systematic review and meta­analysis. e Lancet Infectious diseases 2013;13:426–35.
125. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive care medicine 2013;39:165–228.
126. Barochia AV, Cui X, Vitberg D, et al. Bundled care for sep­tic shock: an analysis of clinical trials. Critical care medicine 2010;38:668–78.
127. Levy MM, Dellinger RP, Townsend SR, etal. e Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline- based perfor­mance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Intensive care medicine 2010;36:222–31.
128. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, etal. Duration of hypotension before initiation of eective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Critical care medi­cine 2006;34:1589–96.
DISTRIBUTIVESHOCK 99
100
https://t.me/medicina_free
129. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, etal. Early goal- directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. e New England journal of medicine 2001;345:1368–77.
130. Varpula M, Karlsson S, Ruokonen E, Pettila V. Mixed venous oxy­gen saturation cannot be estimated by central venous oxygen satu­ration in septic shock. Intensive care medicine 2006;32:1336–43.
131. Scheinman MM, Brown MA, Rapaport E. Critical assessment of use of central venous oxygen saturation as a mirror of mixed venous oxygen in severely ill cardiac patients. Circulation 1969;40:165–72.
132. Sakr Y, Vincent JL, Reinhart K, etal. High tidal volume and posi­tive uid balance are associated with worse outcome in acute lung injury. Chest 2005;128:3098–108.
133. Payen D, de Pont AC, Sakr Y, etal. A positive uid balance is asso­ciated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure. Critical care 2008;12:R74.
134. Macchia A, Romero M, Comignani PD, etal. Previous prescrip­tion of beta- blockers is associated with reduced mortality among patients hospitalized in intensive care units for sepsis. Critical care medicine 2012;40:2768–72.
135. Preiser JC, Lejeune P, Roman A, etal. Methylene blue adminis­tration in septic shock: a clinical trial. Critical care medicine 1995;23:259–64.
136. Memis D, Karamanlioglu B, Yuksel M, Gemlik I, Pamukcu Z. e inuence of methylene blue infusion on cytokine levels during severe sepsis. Anaesthesia and intensive care 2002;30:755–62.
137. Kirov MY, Evgenov OV, Evgenov NV, etal. Infusion of methylene blue in human septic shock:a pilot, randomized, controlled study. Critical care medicine 2001;29:1860–7.
138. Spronk PE, Ince C, Gardien MJ, Mathura KR, Oudemans- van Straaten HM, Zandstra DF. Nitroglycerin in septic shock aer intravascular volume resuscitation. Lancet 2002;360:1395–6.
139. Boerma EC, Koopmans M, Konijn A, etal. Eects of nitroglycerin on sublingual microcirculatory blood ow in patients with severe sepsis/ septic shock aer a strict resuscitation protocol: a double­blind randomized placebo controlled trial. Critical care medicine 2010;38:93–100.
140. Comfere T, Sprung J, Kumar MM, etal. Angiotensin system inhib­itors in a general surgical population. Anesthesia and analgesia 2005;100:636–44, table of contents.
141. Coriat P, Richer C, Douraki T, et al. Inuence of chronic angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibition on anesthetic induc­tion. Anesthesiology 1994;81:299–307.
142. Bertrand M, Godet G, Meersschaert K, Brun L, Salcedo E, Coriat P. Should the angiotensin II antagonists be discontinued before surgery? Anesthesia and analgesia 2001;92:26–30.
143. Rosenman DJ, McDonald FS, Ebbert JO, Erwin PJ, LaBella M, Montori VM. Clinical consequences of withholding versus admin­istering renin- angiotensin- aldosterone system antagonists in the preoperative period. Journal of hospital medicine 2008;3:319–25.
144. Kheterpal S, Khodaparast O, Shanks A, O’Reilly M, Tremper KK. Chronic angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy combined with diuretic therapy is associ­ated with increased episodes of hypotension in noncardiac surgery. Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2008;22:180–6.
145. Trotter J. Catecholamine- resistant hypotension following induc­tion for spinal exploration. AANA journal 2012;80:55–60.
146. Mitra JK, Roy J, Sengupta S. Vasopressin:Its current role in anes­thetic practice. Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer­reviewed, ocial publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine 2011;15:71–7.
147. Sparicio D, Landoni G, Zangrillo A. Angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors predispose to hypotension refractory to norepi­nephrine but responsive to methylene blue. e Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2004;127:608.
148. Drenger B, Fontes ML, Miao Y, etal. Patterns of use of periopera­tive angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors in coronary artery
bypass gra surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: eects on in­hospital morbidity and mortality. Circulation 2012;126:261–9.
149. Twersky RS, Goel V, Narayan P, Weedon J. e risk of hyperten­sion aer preoperative discontinuation of angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists in ambula­tory and same- day admission patients. Anesthesia and analgesia 2014;118:938–44.
150. Lin CY, Tsai IF, Ho YP, et al. Endotoxemia contributes to the immune paralysis in patients with cirrhosis. Journal of hepatology 2007;46:816–26.
151. Frances R, Benlloch S, Zapater P, etal. A sequential study of serum bacterial DNA in patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites. Hepatology 2004;39:484–91.
152. Chan CC, Hwang SJ, Lee FY, etal. Prognostic value of plasma endotoxin levels in patients with cirrhosis. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology 1997;32:942–6.
153. Byl B, Roucloux I, Crusiaux A, Dupont E, Deviere J. Tumor necro­sis factor alpha and interleukin 6 plasma levels in infected cirrhotic patients. Gastroenterology 1993;104:1492–7.
154. Lee FY, Lu RH, Tsai YT, et al. Plasma interleukin- 6 levels in patients with cirrhosis. Relationship to endotoxemia, tumor necro­sis factor- alpha, and hyperdynamic circulation. Scandinavian jour­nal of gastroenterology 1996;31:500–5.
155. Fernandez- Seara J, Prieto J, uiroga J, et al. Systemic and regional hemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis and asci­tes with and without functional renal failure. Gastroenterology 1989;97:1304–12.
156. Wagener G, Kovalevskaya G, Minhaz M, Mattis F, Emond JC, Landry DW. Vasopressin deciency and vasodilatory state in end­stage liver disease. Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2011;25:665–70.
157. Wagener G, Gubitosa G, Renz J, etal. Vasopressin decreases portal vein pressure and ow in the native liver during liver transplanta­tion. Liver transplantation :ocial publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society 2008;14:1664–70.
158. Wadei HM, Mai ML, Ahsan N, Gonwa TA. Hepatorenal syn­drome:pathophysiology and management. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology :CJASN 2006;1:1066–79.
159. Gines P, Guevara M, Arroyo V, Rodes J. Hepatorenal syndrome. Lancet 2003;362:1819–27.
160. Carrel T, Englberger L, Mohacsi P, Neidhart P, Schmidli J. Low systemic vascular resistance aer cardiopulmonary bypass: inci­dence, etiology, and clinical importance. Journal of cardiac surgery 2000;15:347–53.
161. Levin MA, Lin HM, Castillo JG, Adams DH, Reich DL, Fischer GW. Early on- cardiopulmonary bypass hypotension and other factors associated with vasoplegic syndrome. Circulation 2009;120:1664–71.
162. Frering B, Philip I, Dehoux M, Rolland C, Langlois JM, Desmonts JM. Circulating cytokines in patients undergoing normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. e Journal of thoracic and cardiovascu­lar surgery 1994;108:636–41.
163. Fischer GW, Levin MA. Vasoplegia during cardiac surgery:current concepts and management. Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascu­lar surgery 2010;22:140–4.
164. Mekontso- Dessap A, Houel R, Soustelle C, Kirsch M, ebert D, Loisance DY. Risk factors for post- cardiopulmonary bypass vasoplegia in patients with preserved le ventricular function. e Annals of thoracic surgery 2001;71:1428–32.
165. Benedetto U, Sciarretta S, Roscitano A, et al. Preoperative Angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors and acute kidney injury aer coronary artery bypass graing. e Annals of thoracic sur­gery 2008;86:1160–5.
166. Benedetto U, Melina G, Capuano F, etal. Preoperative angiotensin­converting enzyme inhibitors protect myocardium from ischemia
100 PART III.SHOCK
https://t.me/medicina_free
101
during coronary artery bypass gra surgery. Journal of cardiovascu­lar medicine 2008;9:1098–103.
167. Noto A, Lentini S, Versaci A, et al. A retrospective analysis of terlipressin in bolus for the management of refractory vasoplegic hypotension aer cardiac surgery. Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 2009;9:588–92.
168. Argenziano M, Choudhri AF, Oz MC, Rose EA, Smith CR, Landry DW. A prospective randomized trial of arginine vasopres­sin in the treatment of vasodilatory shock aer le ventricular assist device placement. Circulation 1997;96:II- 286–90.
169. Argenziano M, Chen JM, Choudhri AF, etal. Management of vasodilatory shock aer cardiac surgery:identication of predis­posing factors and use of a novel pressor agent. e Journal of tho­racic and cardiovascular surgery 1998;116:973–80.
170. Beasley D, McGuiggin M. Interleukin 1 activates soluble guanyl­ate cyclase in human vascular smooth muscle cells through a novel nitric oxide- independent pathway. e Journal of experimental medicine 1994;179:71–80.
171. Schmidt HH. NO., CO and. OH. Endogenous soluble guanylyl cyclase- activating factors. FEBS letters 1992;307:102–7.
172. Aggarwal S, Kang Y, Freeman JA, Fortunato FL, Pinsky MR. Postreperfusion syndrome: cardiovascular collapse following hepatic reperfusion during liver transplantation. Transplantation proceedings 1987;19:54–5.
173. Paugam- Burtz C, Kavafyan J, Merckx P, etal. Postreperfusion syn­drome during liver transplantation for cirrhosis:outcome and pre­dictors. Liver transplantation :ocial publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society 2009;15:522–9.
174. Aggarwal S, Kang Y, Freeman JA, Fortunato FL, Jr., Pinsky MR. Postreperfusion syndrome: hypotension aer reperfusion of the transplanted liver. Journal of critical care 1993;8:154–60.
175. Ayanoglu HO, Ulukaya S, Tokat Y. Causes of postreperfusion syndrome in living or cadaveric donor liver transplantations. Transplantation proceedings 2003;35:1442–4.
176. Acosta F, Sansano T, Contreras RF, etal. Changes in serum potas­sium during reperfusion in liver transplantation. Transplantation proceedings 1999;31:2382–3.
177. Xu ZD, Xu HT, Yuan HB, et al. Postreperfusion syndrome dur­ing orthotopic liver transplantation: a single- center experience. Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international : HBPD INT 2012;11:34–9.
178. Matsusaki T, Hilmi IA, Planinsic RM, Humar A, Sakai T. Cardiac arrest during adult liver transplantation:a single institution’s expe­rience with 1238 deceased donor transplants. Liver transplantation :ocial publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society 2013;19:1262–71.
179. Hilmi I, Horton CN, Planinsic RM, etal. e impact of postre­perfusion syndrome on short- term patient and liver allogra outcome in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplanta­tion. Liver transplantation :ocial publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society 2008;14:504–8.
180. Belghiti J, Noun R, Sauvanet A. Temporary portocaval anastomo­sis with preservation of caval ow during orthotopic liver trans­plantation. American journal of surgery 1995;169:277–9.
181. Millis JM, Melinek J, Csete M, etal. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate ush and reperfusion techniques in liver transplanta­tion. Transplantation 1997;63:397–403.
182. Acosta F, Sansano T, Contreras RF, et al. Phenylephrine treat­ment of the postreperfusion syndrome in liver transplantation. Transplantation proceedings 1999;31:2373–4.
183. Paulsen AW, Valek TR, Ramsay MA, Swygert T, Whitten CW. Eects of atropine pretreatment on the revascularization syn­drome. Transplantation proceedings 1989;21:2341–2.
184. Pittet JF, Morel DR, Mentha G, Le Coultre C, Suter PM, Rohner A. Protective eect of indomethacin in the development of the postreperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation in pigs. Transplantation proceedings 1991;23:2290–6.
185. Moneret- Vautrin DA, Morisset M, Flabbee J, Beaudouin E, Kanny G. Epidemiology of life- threatening and lethal anaphylaxis: a review. Allergy 2005;60:443–51.
186. Simon MR, Mulla ZD. A population- based epidemiologic analysis of deaths from anaphylaxis in Florida. Allergy 2008;63:1077–83.
187. Kaliner M, Sigler R, Summers R, Shelhamer JH. Eects of infused histamine:analysis of the eects of H- 1 and H- 2 histamine recep­tor antagonists on cardiovascular and pulmonary responses. e Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 1981;68:365–71.
188. Sampson HA, Munoz- Furlong A, Campbell RL, etal. Second sym­posium on the denition and management of anaphylaxis: sum­mary report- - Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/ Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. e Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 2006;117:391–7.
189. Sampson HA, Mendelson L, Rosen JP. Fatal and near- fatal ana­phylactic reactions to food in children and adolescents. e New England journal of medicine 1992;327:380–4.
190. omas M, Crawford I. Best evidence topic report. Glucagon infu­sion in refractory anaphylactic shock in patients on beta- blockers. Emergency medicine journal :EMJ 2005;22:272–3.
191. Banerji A, Long AA, Camargo CA, Jr. Diphenhydramine versus nonsedating antihistamines for acute allergic reactions: a litera­ture review. Allergy and asthma proceedings :the ocial journal of regional and state allergy societies 2007;28:418–26.
192. Choo KJ, Simons FE, Sheikh A. Glucocorticoids for the treat­ment of anaphylaxis. e Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2012;4:CD007596.
193. Schwartz LB. Tryptase, a mediator of human mast cells. e Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 1990;86:594–8.
194. Hahner S, Loeer M, Bleicken B, etal. Epidemiology of adrenal crisis in chronic adrenal insuciency:the need for new preven­tion strategies. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies 2010;162:597–602.
195. Cronin CC, Callaghan N, Kearney PJ, Murnaghan DJ, Shanahan F. Addison disease in patients treated with glucocorticoid therapy. Archives of internal medicine 1997;157:456–8.
196. Grossman A, Johannsson G, uinkler M, Zelissen P. erapy of endocrine disease: Perspectives on the management of adrenal insuciency:clinical insights from across Europe. European jour­nal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies 2013;169:R165–75.
197. Falorni A, Minarelli V, Morelli S. erapy of adrenal insu­ciency:an update. Endocrine 2013;43:514–28.
198. Taylor RL, Grebe SK , Singh RJ. uantitative, highly sensitive liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry method for detection of synthetic corticosteroids. Clinical chemistry 2004;50:2345–52.
199. Bergthorsdottir R, Leonsson- Zachrisson M, Oden A, Johannsson G. Premature mortality in patients with Addison’s disease: a population- based study. e Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2006;91:4849–53.
DISTRIBUTIVESHOCK 101
102
EBVHct Hct
if
av
(
)
https://t.me/medicina_free
12.
HYPOVOLEMICSHOCK
Paul David Weyker, Christopher Allen- John Webb, and Tricia E. Brentjens
CASE
BOX 12.1 ESTIMATED ALLOWABLE BLOOD LOSS(EABL)
A 23- year- old woman G3P2 at 40 weeks gestation presents for a planned tertiary cesarean section. Aprior ultrasound showed placenta previa with suspected placenta accreta. An expired type and screen was found to have antibodies. e preoperative nurse has already placed one 18G intravenous catheter. Her vital signs are within normal limits, and her hemoglobin level is 9.5 g/ dL, platelet count 350 × 109/ L, and coagulation studies are within normal limits. e obstetrician tells you that she is “concerned” this will be a
ABL
=
EBV=Estimated Blood Volume of the patient
Hcti=Patient’s Initial Hematocrit
Hctf=Minimal Allowable Hematocrit for your patient
Hctav=Average of Hcti andHct
Reference:Estimating Allowable Blood Loss:Corrected for Dilution. Jeffrey B Gross. Anesthesiology,1983.
Hct
f
dicultcase.
INTRODUCTION
pressure variation (PPV), systolic pressure variation (SPV), and stroke volume variation (SVV) into perioperative mon-
itoring systems, many clinicians are able to follow trends in Broadly dened, hypovolemia represents inadequate circu­lating plasma volume leading to decreased cardiac preload and thus decreased blood pressure. Common causes of hypo­volemic shock during the perioperative period include hem­orrhage, diuretics, and gastrointestinal losses. Preoperative assessment of volume status determines whether the patient is relatively hypovolemic. e anesthetic plan includes cal­culation of allowable blood loss (Box 12.1 and Table 12.1).1 e anesthesiologist should ask about conditions that may predispose the patient to hypovolemia such as diuretic use,
these dynamic measurements to predict uid responsive-
ness in mechanically ventilated patients. Models of sepsis-
induced hypotension have demonstrated that both SPV2
and PPV3 are sensitive markers for predicting uid respon-
siveness. Central venous pressure (CVP) is a poor monitor
for hypovolemia, because values are highly variable and are
inuenced by venous compliance, pleural pressure, abdom-
inal pressure, and intravascular volume.4 Central venous
pressure is best used as a trend monitor in cases of right
heart failure and aer open- heart surgery. prolonged NPO status, vomiting, or diarrhea. Prompt resuscitation is imperative to restore blood ow and thus oxygen delivery to tissues. Volume decits can be replaced
DIURETIC- INDUCED HYPOVOLEMIA
with crystalloid, colloid, or blood products.
Diuretics are among the most commonly used antihyper-
HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING FORHYPOVOLEMIA
tensive medications in the world. Diuretics impair renal
reabsorption of solutes to decrease reabsorption of water.
In general, diuretics are classied based on their location of
action within the nephron, and specic diuretics are associ­In recent years, an emphasis on goal- directed uid therapy has changed clinical practice in the perioperative setting. With the introduction of dynamic monitors such as pulse
ated with dierent electrolyte abnormalities (Table 12.2).5
Consensus on whether or not to hold diuretics on the day
of surgery is lacking, and this decision oen varies among
102
https://t.me/medicina_free
103
TABLE12.1 EBV=WEIGHT (KG) × AVERAGE BLOODVOLUME
Blood Volume mL/ kg
Premature 95
Neonate 90
Infant 85
Adult Man 75
Adult Woman 65
of high volumes may cause a hyperchloremic metabolic aci­dosis. e SAFE trial, a multicenter, randomized, double­blind, trial of nearly 7,000 patients compared the use of albumin versus normal saline for uid resuscitation in the intensive care unit (ICU). is trial found no signicant dierence in 28- day mortality.6 e CRISTAL trial was a large multicenter, randomized trial comparing the use of colloids versus crystalloids for resuscitation in 2,857 ICU patients with hypovolemic shock. Patients were random­ized to receive either colloids (gelatins, dextrans, hydroxy-
ethyl starches, or albumin) or crystalloids (normal saline or dierent institutions. Obtaining a history about diuretic use and evaluation of electrolyte abnormalities can help manage the patient’s perioperative uid status.
CRYSTALLOID VERSUS COLLOID
Ringer’s lactate solution) for all uid administration other
than maintenance uids in the ICU. is study found no
dierence in 28- day mortality, although there was a small
mortality benet in the colloid group at 90days.
7
HEMORRHAGE
Optimal resuscitation uid has been debated without any clear consensus of mortality benets. Ageneral rule when comparing the use of crystalloid versus colloid is that one must give approximately 1.4– 1.6 times as much volume of crystalloid as compared to colloid, due to extravascular uid distribution of crystalloids. Crystalloids are much less expensive compared to colloids, and for this reason, they are oen the uid of choice in acute resuscitation of hypo­volemic patients. Normal saline (NaCl) is oen the uid of choice in acute volume resuscitation, but the administration
Hemorrhage is dened as the loss of blood from either
blood vessels or mucosal surfaces. While many classica-
tion systems for hemorrhage exist, perhaps the most widely
recognized classication is from the American College of
Surgeons. e Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) sys-
tem classies patients into four main categories based on a
set of clinical signs obtained during the initial presentation
(heart rate, systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, respira-
tory rate, mental status, and hourly urine output).8 Adult
TABLE12.2 COMMONLY USED DIURETICS
Diuretic
Loop (furosemide, bumetanide, torsemide, ethacrynic acid)
Thiazide (hydrochlorothiazide, chlorothiazide)
Potassium­sparing (amiloride, triameterene, spironolatone, eplerenone)
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors (Acetazolamide)
Osmotic Diuretics (Mannitol)
Mechanism of Action Electrolyte Abnormalities
Blocks Na- K- ATPase in thick ascending limb of loop of Henle
Sodium transport inhibition in distal tubule
All work in cortical collecting tubule. Spironolactone and eplerenone are aldosterone antagonists, amiloride and triameterene decrease sodium channel activity
Primarily works in the proximal tubule, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor causing NaCl and bicarbonate loss
Nonreabsorbable sugar inhibiting sodium and water reabsorption in the proximal tubule and loop of Henle
Indications
hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypochloremia, hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia, metabolic alkalosis
hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hypochloremia, hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis
hyperkalemia Spironolactone (CHF unresponsive to other
metabolic acidosis (decreases serum bicarbonate)
hypernatremia or dilutional hyponatremia, dilutional metabolic acidosis, hyperosmolality induced hyperkalemia
hypertension, heart failure edema, acute pulmonary edema
hypertension, heart failure edema
therapies, hypokalemia, edema/ ascites associated with cirrhosis, hypertension, primary hyperaldosterionism) Amiloride (used to counteract hypokalemia associated with other diuretics
altitude sickness, edema, epilepsy, glaucoma, metabolic alkalosis
reduction of increased intracranial pressure, reduction of intraocular pressure, promoting urinary excretion of toxic substances, transurethral surgical procedures
HYPOVOLEMICSHOCK 103
104
https://t.me/medicina_free
TABLE12.3 ATLS CLASS OFHEMORRHAGE
ClassI ClassII ClassIII
Blood loss (mL) Up to 750 750- 1500 1500- 2000 >2000
Blood loss (%blood volume) Up to 15% 15%- 30% 30%- 40% >40%
Pulse rate (BPM) <100 100- 120 120- 140 >140
Systolic blood pressure Normal Normal Decreased Decreased
Pulse pressure (mmHg) Normal or increased Decreased Decreased Decreased
Respiratory rate (per minute) 14- 20 20- 30 30- 40 >35
Urine output (mL/ hr) >30 20- 30 5- 15 Negligible
Central nervous system/ mental status
Initial uid replacement Crystalloid Crystalloid Crystalloid and Blood Crystalloid and Blood
SOURCE:Reprinted from the Advanced Trauma Life Support Student Course Manual, with permission of the American College of Surgeons.
Slightly anxious Mildly anxious Anxious, confused Confused, lethargic
patients can lose up to 30% of their circulating blood vol­ume, ClassII hemorrhage, before having a decrease in blood pressure (see Table 12.3). ClassII hemorrhage can rapidly progress to ClassIII hemorrhage, where there is a 40% loss
early blood product administration.14 While the BD does seem promising, larger, prospective studies are needed to more clearly dene its role in risk stratication of patients presenting with hemorrhagicshock.
ClassIV
in circulating blood volume along with signs of inadequate perfusion, marked tachycardia, tachypnea, altered mental status, decreased urine output, and decreased blood pres­sure.8 Based on the classication of hemorrhage, ATLS
PREOPERATIVE IDENTIFICATION OFPATIENTS ATRISK FORBLEEDING
makes recommendations for initial uid replacement of crystalloid +/ - blood.8 Derangements in cardiovascular physiology are multifactorial, which makes it dicult to apply the ATLS classication to every patient.
9,10
Arecent retrospective study of over 36,000 trauma patients attempted to classify patients based on heart rate, blood pressure, and Glasgow coma scale. Over 90% of trauma patients were unable to be correctly classied into the ATLS system for hypovolemic shock.11 Other modalities have been investi­gated for the assessment of hypovolemic shock. Although the concept of base decit (BD) as a surrogate for volume decit is not new,12 there are few studies validating its use for classifying hypovolemic shock. Davis and colleagues initially described the four classes of hypovolemic shock based on the BD of trauma patients.13 Severity of shock was graded with a BD of 2– 6 mmol/ L, 6– 10 mmol/ L, and greater than 10mmol/ L associated with mild, moder­ate, or severe shock, respectively.13 In order to validate this new system in trauma patients, Mutschler etal. retrospec­tively applied the BD classication to over 16,000 trauma patients.14 When compared with the traditional ATLS sys­tem, the BD classication was found to be superior not only in identifying the presence of hypovolemic shock but also in the early recognition of patients who may benet from
As part of the preoperative evaluation, anesthesiologists identify patients at risk for signicant perioperative blood loss. Both patient- and procedure- specic risk factors are identied (Table 12.4). Patients with a previous history for perioperative bleeding; known coagulopathies secondary to medications or underlying disease states such as end­stage liver disease, renal failure, or hemophilia; or patients undergoing major vascular surgery, cardiac surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass, or hepatic resection may be at increased risk for perioperative bleeding. Adequate intravenous access should be obtained in patients at high risk of bleeding or who are undergoing surgical procedures associated with a large amount of blood loss to ensure the ability to quickly restore intravascular volume. Approximate ow rates for intravenous catheters are shown in Table12.5. Flow rate through a catheter is proportional to the radius to the fourth power, and inversely proportional to the length of the catheter, following the Hagen- Poiseuille equation. If the radius of the catheter doubles, the ow rate increases by a factor of 16. Aperipheral IV (5cm) will theoretically allow three times the ow rate compared to the central venous catheter (15cm) with the same gauge. For this reason, cen­tral catheters, due to their long length, are inadequate for
104 PART III.SHOCK
https://t.me/medicina_free
105
TABLE12.4 PERIOPERATIVE FACTORS ASSOCIATED
WITHHEMORRHAGE
Patient Factors Surgical Factors
Drugs (aspirin, warfarin, etc.) Cardiopulmonar y bypass
Liver disease Liver transplant
Kidney disease ECMO
Thrombocytopenia Open major vascular surgery
Von Willebrand disease
Hemophilia
Sepsis
DIC
Vitamin K deciency
vessel and can be stopped with clamping or occlusion.15
TABLE12.5 ESTIMATED INTRAVENOUS
CATHETER FLOWRATES
Gauge
22 2.5cm 35
20 3.2cm 60
18 3.2cm 105
16 3.2cm 215
14 5.0cm 345
14 16cm 90
16 16cm 50
18 16cm 25
Length
Flow Rate (mL/ min)
During uncontrolled hemorrhage, bleeding intermittently
stops due to hypotension, vasoconstriction, or thrombus rapid volume resuscitation. Instead, a central venous cath­eter should be placed for the infusion of vasopressors in order to maintain an adequate perfusion pressure during volume resuscitation if their use is anticipated.
formation.15 During controlled hemorrhage, hemodynam-
ics are normalized with uid resuscitation, whereas during
uncontrolled hemorrhage, permissive hypotension may be
allowed in order to minimize further blood loss.
15
Other classications for hemorrhage are based on loca-
MANAGEMENT OFPERIOPERATIVE BLEEDING
tion and vary depending on the nature of the injury and
the type of surgery. External hemorrhage involves open
fractures or amputations, and internal hemorrhage includes Patients undergoing procedures at high risk for intraopera­tive blood loss (Table 12.4) or patients with known coagu­lopathies should undergo blood typing and cross- matching prior to surgery. In cases where antibody screening is positive, determining the availability of blood products is imperative. In rare cases where multiple antibodies are
the thoracic, peritoneal, retroperitoneal, intramuscular, and
subcutaneousareas.
Antibrinolytics and exogenous clotting factors are occasionally used both on- and o- label to prevent and treat massive hemorrhage perioperatively. Several of these agents are reviewed in Tables 12.6 and12.7.
detected, the anesthesiologist and surgeon should coordi­nate with the blood bank to ensure that a sucient number of blood products are available based on the type of surgery.
MASSIVE TRANSFUSION PROTOCOLS
Intraoperative hemorrhage can be categorized as con­trolled or uncontrolled. During controlled hemorrhage, bleeding is oen secondary to disruption of a major blood
Historically, massive transfusion has been dened as trans­fusion of greater than 10 units of blood within 24 hours or
TABLE12.6 ANTIFIBRINOLYTIC MEDICATIONS
Medication
Tranexamic Acid
Aminocaproic Acid
HYPOVOLEMICSHOCK 105
Indication Mechanism Dosing
Tooth extraction in patients with hemophilia, cyclic heavy menstrual bleeding (all other uses off- label)
Fibrinolytic bleeding Binds competitively to
Inhibits brinolysis by displacing plasminogen from brin, reduces plasmin activity
plasminogen, blocks binding of plasminogen and plasmin to brin, thus preventing brinolysis
10 mg/ kg IV prior to surgery, followed by same dose 3- 4 times/ day for 6- 8days
Initial 4- 5 g IV during rst hour, then 1 g/ hr continuous infusion (maximum 30 g/ day)
Special Considerations
Hypotension with rapid IV injection, headache, abdominal pain, back pain
Contraindicated in disseminated intravascular coagulation, rapid IV injection can cause hypotension, bradycardia
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025