Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 911 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
8 Мб
Скачать
146
https://t.me/medicina_free
TABLE18.1 GLOBAL INITIATIVE ONOBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE CLASSIFICATION (GOLD) OFCOPD BASED ONSEVERITY
OFPOSTBRONCHODILATORFEV
1
Stages Severity Predicted FEV
Stage 1 Mild
Stage 2 Moderate 50%- 80% Inuenza vaccine
Stage 3 Severe 30%- 50% Inuenza vaccine
Stage 4 Very severe <30 %
Suggested treatment plans present. Short- acting bronchodilators=beta- 2 agonists or anticholinergics.
80%
Or < 50% but with chronic respiratory distress
1
and prolonged ventilation.1 Previous anesthetic history and comorbidities should also be considered.3 Patients with air­ow disruption oen present with dyspnea, cough, chest tightness, and sputum production. Afocused physical exam may detect wheezing, rhonci, a prolonged expiratory phase, or, in the case of severe airway obstruction, diminished or absent breath sounds.
1
A postbronchodilator FEV1/ FVC < 0.70 is indicative obstructive disease. Patients with asthma have a reversible airway obstruction with more than 12% improvement in FEV1 postbronchodilator administration. Of note, PFTs can normalize in between asthma attacks and therefore can appear deceptively normal at the time of testing. Spirometric classication of COPD is listed in Table 18.1. If the patient is intubated, capnography can demonstrate an obstruc­tive pattern and the ventilator may display air stacking and elevated peak airway pressures. In extreme cases, dynamic hyperination and cardiovascular collapse can be observed.
Treatment
Inuenza vaccine, short- acting bronchodilator (PRN)
Respiratory rehabilitation Short- acting and ≥ 1 long- acting bronchodilator
Respiratory rehabilitation Short- acting and ≥ 1 long- acting bronchodilator Inhaled glucocorticoid
Inuenza vaccine Respiratory rehabilitation Short- acting and ≥ 1 long- acting bronchodilator, oxygen dependence, lung transplant or lung volume reduction surgery
during tracheal intubation of the asthmatic,3 as it has been shown to relax airway smooth muscle and is a superior bron­chodilator in comparison to thiopental and etomidate.10 Ketamine has bronchodilatory eects as well, making it useful for induction,1 however it can also cause an increase in airway secretions. e addition of opioids on induction can blunt the stimulation caused by tracheal intubation and decrease airway resistance.3 Certain inhaled anesthetics, in particular sevourane and isourane, have inherent bron­chodilator eects.
1,3
Desurane has however been shown to cause bronchoconstriction.1 Inhaled gases should be warm and humidied at all times.1 Special consideration should be taken when using neuromuscular blockers in asthmat­ics. e use of histamine- releasing neuromuscular blockers, such as atracurium and mivacurium, can cause histamine­mediated bronchoconstriction.3 In addition, neuromuscu­lar blocking agents are the most common cause of allergic reaction in the operating room and anaphylaxis- induced bronchospasm should always be a consideration following
ASTHMA AND CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE— MANAGEMENT OF THE PATIENT
Patients should be encouraged to take their daily asthma medications on the day of surgery. Preoperatively, a short­acting beta- 2 agonist can decrease airway resistance, par­ticularly in patients with evidence of wheezing on exam.3 ere is no denitive evidence that one anesthetic strategy is superior to another in preventing bronchospasm in the asthmatic. While regional and neuraxial techniques can avoid instrumentation of the airway, anxiety or pain during these procedures can precipitate bronchospasm.1 In terms of induction medications, propofol is the most suitable agent
their administration.2 e use of anticholinesterase medi­cations such as neostigmine is safe in conjunction with an anticholinergic, such as glycopyrrolate, to balance the bron­choconstriction seen with anticholinesterase medications.3 Of note, Suggamadex has no anticholinesterase eect, and can be used safely in asthma.
3
Ventilation strategies should focus on avoiding baro­trauma. In addition, one should be conservative with the use of PEEP, replacing 50%– 75% of intrinsic PEEP with extrinsic PEEP in order to minimize air trapping.3 e use of prolonged expiratory times can aid in preventing air trap­ping.1 Upon induction and initiation of positive pressure ventilation, the patient can be at signicant risk of devel­oping dynamic hyperination and cardiovascular collapse.
146 PART IV. PULMONARY CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
147
Dynamic hyperination is triggered when the inspired tidal volume occurs before the previous volume is fully exhaled. is leads to an increase in intrathoracic volume and gener­ates intrinsic PEEP. Venous return is subsequently impaired, resulting in a decrease in cardiac output, possibly to the point of pulseless electrical activity and cardiac arrest.11 To decrease the likelihood of this catastrophic event, preinduction hydra-
predictor of risk of developing status asthmaticus. Other risk factors include noncompliance or untreated asthma, history of glucocorticoid use, psychiatric disease, comor­bidities, low socioeconomic status, urban residence, and illicit drug use. Poor perception of dyspnea is also a risk factor that can increase the likelihood of going into a major acute exacerbation.
tion and bronchodilator administration is imperative.
Short- acting beta- 2 agonists, such as albuterol and lev­abuterol, are the quickest way to rapidly reverse airow obstruction, with an onset time of 5 minutes or less and peak eect in 30– 60 minutes.1 Anticholinergic broncho­dilators, such as ipratropium, should be added in the case of beta- blocker- induced asthmatic attack.7 Parenteral ste­roids can be used in acute asthma exacerbations, however their benecial eect on acute bronchospasm can take 4– 6 hours.1 Treatment of dynamic hyperination involves ces­sation of ventilation, while maintaining a patent airway, in order to allow for complete exhalation and a decrease in intrathoracic pressure. In refractory cases, IV epinephrine (0.25– 0.5 mg/ min) may be indicated to resolve the airow
STATUS ASTHMATICUS— ASSESSMENT OFTHE PATIENT
Patients present with severe shortness of breath and tachypnea. Status asthmaticus is associated with the pres­ence of hypocapnia, which progresses to hypercapnia secondary to fatigue due to increased work of breathing, and ultimately acidemia (both respiratory and meta­bolic), altered level of consciousness, and cardiovascular collapse. Patients in status asthmaticus are at increased risk of death secondary to cardiac arrhythmias as well as complications of mechanical ventilation, specically barotrauma and pneumonia.
13
obstruction. Antibiotics should be considered if there is any indication of an active infection.
STATUS ASTHMATICUS— MANAGEMENT
ASTHMA AND CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE— FOLLOW- UP
Every eort should be made to extubate the patients at the end of the case. However, if airow disruption is severe, mechanical ventilation may be necessary until the patient is appropriately managed with medications to help con­trol inammation and decrease bronchoconstriction.12 In COPD patients, noninvasive mechanical ventilation can provide respiratory support and help maintain an appropri­ate arterial CO2, therefore avoiding acidosis.
Patients need to be intubated and started on a mechanical ventilation when they have refractory hypoxemia (PaO2 < 60 mmHG) and progressively worsening hypercapnia (PaCO2 > 55– 77 mmHg). Other signs that point to the need for mechanical ventilation include patient exhaustion, worsening mental status, hemodynamic instability, loss of consciousness, or apnea. An experienced provider should perform the intubation. A large- size endotracheal tube is indicated in order to aid in the clearance of secretions and to minimize airway resistance. Ventilator settings should be thoughtfully set with the goal of avoiding barotrauma, maintaining oxygen saturation above 90%, and permis-
STATUS ASTHMATICUS— MECHANISM
Status asthmaticus is associated with severe smooth muscle bronchoconstriction, inammation, edema, and mucus plugging. is contributes to intrapulmonary shunting that leads to various degrees of hypoxemia. Severe air­way obstruction can lead to dynamic hyperination and decreased cardiac output as previously reviewed in this chapter. is can lead to a near fatal asthma attack.
13
sive hypercapnia. e mode of ventilation should adapt to any compliance changes in order to minimize elevated airway pressures. Inspiratory/ expiratory ratio should be set at ≥ 1:3, and tidal volumes should fall in the range of 6– 8 mL/ kg with a respiratory rate of 10– 12 breaths/ minute. Inspiratory ow should be set at 100L/ min.
Oxygen therapy is the primary treatment, with the goal of maintaining an oxygen saturation of greater than 90% (greater 95% in patients with cardiac disease and pregnant women). First line pharmacotherapy is a short- acting beta-
STATUS ASTHMATICUS— RISK FACTORS
A history of recurrent asthma exacerbations requiring hospitalization and mechanical ventilation is a major
2 agonist, most commonly albuterol. Usual dose is four to eight pus every 10 minutes, or 5.0 to 7.5 mg of nebulized albuterol. Levalbuterol should be considered in refrac­tory asthma or in patients with coronary artery disease.
PHYSIOLOGIC AIRFLOW DISRUPTION 147
148
https://t.me/medicina_free
Anticholinergic agents can be used, especially if FEV1 is less than 50% predicted.
13
In cases where beta- 2 agonist therapy does not work, systemic subcutaneous epinephrine (0.3– 0.5 mL, 1:1000) every 20 minutes is indicated. is should not exceed three consecutive doses. In pregnant patients, subcutaneous terbu­taline (0.25– 0.5 mg) is the drug of choice. Intravenous epi­nephrine boluses or infusions should be initiated if patient does not respond to the above therapies. Systemic cortico­steroids should be initiated as soon as possible in patients presenting in status asthmaticus. Patients need to be started on 80– 125 mg IV methylprednisolone every 6 hours for the rst 24 hours. is dose should be tapered over time. In refractory cases, a trial of IV ketamine or magnesium can help relieve symptoms. Methylxanthines, such as theophyl­line, have a very narrow therapeutic range and should only
is easy. e anesthesia monitor now displays a mean arterial blood pressure of 30mmHg. What is the dierential? What are the rst steps in management?
3. You stabilize your patient and secure the airway. What size ETT will you choose (height 70inches, weight 200 pounds)? Why? What size DLT will you place? Will you inate the bronchial cu? Why or whynot?
4. Aer DLT placement, you notice the peak airway pressure to be 40cmH2O. What is the dierential?
5. Airway pressures have now dropped to 28cmH2O. Patient is ipped and in the le lateral decubitus position. Airway pressures increase back to mid 40s, and blood pressure drops to a MAP of 50mmHg. Oxygen saturation is 85% on 100% FiO2. What is the rst step you willtake?
be used in exceptional circumstances. To decrease the work of breathing and ow resistance in a severely obstructed air­way, a low- density helium- oxygen (Heliox) gas mixture can be initiated.13 Inhaled sevourane has also been reported to help with bronchodilation, in cases where patients were resistant to conservative therapy.14 Extracorporeal CO2 removers have been successful, and in extreme cases, extra­corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support can be used to bridge cases with near fatal asthma attacks until the severe airway obstruction resolves.
15,16
6. e patient undergoes an uneventful thoracoscopic right middle lobectomy. How do you calculate the predicted postoperative FEV1? Assume your patient’s predicted postoperative FEV1 is 50%. Will the patient likely extubate? What if his predicted FEV1 was35%?
7. How will you manage this patient’s COPD in the postoperative stage? Will you administer O2 in the recovery room? In the PACU, his respiratory status deteriorates and patient is hypercapnic. Will you reintubate? What is another alternative to intubation?
STATUS ASTHMATICUS— FOLLOW- UP
What are the potential contraindications to this alternative therapy?
Aer an episode of status asthmaticus, if there is no improvement to baseline aer 4 to 6 hours, patients should be admitted, observed, and medically optimized in a hos-
REFERENCES
pital setting. Upon discharge, patients need to be able to assess their peak expiratory ow at home, practice medicine compliance, and be familiar with the symptoms and signs of acute exacerbation.
CASE- BASED LEARNING DISCUSSION
1. What is the single best test to predict whether or not this patient will be extubated at the end of the case? Apreoperative cardiac echo showed normal le ventricular function with mildly decreased right ventricular function and moderately elevated pulmonary pressures. Is a pulmonary artery catheter indicated in this case? Why or whynot?
2. Induction was completed with an IV agent and nondepolarizing muscle relaxant. Mask ventilation
1. Woods B, Sladen R. Perioperative considerations for the patient with asthma and bronchospasm. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2009;103(Suppl 1):i57– i65.
2. Dewachter P, Mouton- Faivre C, Emala C, Beloucif S. Case sce­nario:bronchospasm during anesthetic induction. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(5):1200– 10.
3. Yamakage M, Iwasaki S, Namiki A. Guideline- oriented perioperative management of patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstruc­tive pulmonary disease. Journal of Anesthesia. 2008;22(4):412– 28.
4. Kodali B. Capnography.com. 2001. Available at http:// www.cap­nography.com.
5. Alter H, Koepsell T, Hilty W. Intravenous magnesium as an adju­vant in acute bronchospasm:a meta- analysis. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2000;36(3):191– 7.
6. Olin J, Wechsler M. Asthma:pathogenesis and novel drugs for treat­ment. British Medical Journal. 2014;349(8):g5517– g5517.
7. Fanta C. Asthma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009; 360(10):1002– 14.
8. Decramer M, Janssens W, Miravitlles M. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 2012;379(9823):1341– 51
9. Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive
148 PART IV. PULMONARY CRISES
https://t.me/medicina_free
149
pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2007;176(6):532– 55.
10. Eames W, Rooke A, Sai- Chuen Wu R, Bishop M. Comparison of the eects of etomidate, propofol, and thiopental on respira­tory resistance aer tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1996; 84(6):1307– 11.
11. Berlin D. Hemodynamic consequences of auto- PEEP. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2014;29(2):81– 6.
12. Uddin M, Levy BD. Resolvins: natural agonists for resolution of pulmonary inammation. Progress in Lipid Research. 2011; 50(1):75– 88.
13. Restrepo RD, Peters J. Near- fatal asthma:recognition and manage­ment. Current opinion in pulmonary medicine. 2008;14(1):13– 23.
14. Ng D, Fahimi J, Hern HG. Sevourane administration initiated out of the ED for life- threatening status asthmaticus. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 33(8):1110 e1113– 1116.
15. Brenner K, Abrams DC, Agerstrand CL, Brodie D. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for refractory status asthmaticus:experience in distinct exacerbation phenotypes. Perfusion. 2014;29(1):26– 8.
16. Alzeer AH, Al Otair HA, Khurshid SM, Badrawy SE, Bakir BM. A case of near fatal asthma:the role of ECMO as rescue therapy. Annals of oracic Medicine. 2015;10(2):143– 5.
PHYSIOLOGIC AIRFLOW DISRUPTION 149
150
https://t.me/medicina_free
19.
MECHANICAL AIRFLOW DISRUPTION
Alissa Sodickson and JamesHardy
CLINICALCASE
A 45- year- old man presents to the operating room for a lapa­roscopic cholecystectomy. e patient has a history of hyper­tension, hyperlipidemia, and mild intermittent asthma.
OVERVIEW OFAIRWAY ANATOMY
e anatomical structures that constitute the airway are typically divided into upper airway structures and lower airway structures. e upper airway includes structures to the level of the glottis. e lower airway is made up of structures from the glottis to the alveoli and includes the trachea, mainstem bronchi, and generations of bronchi down to bronchioles, alveolar ducts, and nally alveolar sacs (Figure 19.1). e average length of the adult trachea, which extends from the larynx to the carina, is 10 to 12cm, and the distance from the upper incisors to the carina ranges from 22 to 30cm. is distance changes with changes in
reported an incidence of roughly 5% to 13% based on chest x- ray
1– 3
and an analysis of the Australian Incident Monitoring Study (AIMS) database showed a reported incidence of 2.36%– 6.1% over a 7- year period, with right mainstem intubation accounting for approximately 97% of the total endobronchial intubations.
1
Risk factors for endobronchial intubation include sur­geries of the head and neck as well as laparoscopic proce­dures, where the position of the endotracheal tube tip in relation to the carina can change during the procedure. In the case of head and neck surgery, repositioning into prone or lateral positions can cause inadvertent movement of the endotracheal tube. In addition, movement from an extended neck, as oen is the case during intubation, to a state of neck exion is associated with forward movement of the endotra­cheal tube anywhere from 2.0 to 5.2cm.
4,5
Insuation of the abdomen to a pressure of 10mmHg during laparoscopy has been associated with upward displacement of the carina of up to 1.5cm.6 e use of RAE tubes has also been associated with an increased incidence of endobronchial intubations.
1
neck position as discussed below. e right and le main­stem bronchi branch o the carina with the right mainstem bronchi being shorter (average length 2.5cm) and slightly wider than the le mainstem bronchus (average length 5cm). e angle at which the main bronchi branch from the carina diers; the right mainstem bronchi branches at an angle of 20– 30 degrees from midline and the le main­stem bronchi branches more horizontally at an angle of 40- 50 degrees. is dierence accounts for the tendency of endotracheal tubes and aspirated contents to preferentially travel down the right main bronchus.
ENDOBRONCHIAL INTUBATION— DIAGNOSIS
Clinical signs and symptoms of endobronchial intubation can be subtle and nonspecic, oen resulting in delayed detec­tion. Observation of symmetrical chest rise and auscultation of breath sounds have low sensitivity for the detection of endobronchial intubation.7 e end- tidal CO2 can increase, decrease, or remain unchanged, and the waveform may appear biphasic, obstructive, or normal.8 If using a volume­controlled mode of mechanical ventilation, endobronchial intubation will result in an increase in peak inspiratory pres-
ENDOBRONCHIAL INTUBATION— INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTORS
e incidence of inadvertent endobronchial intubation is largely unknown because it is oen unrecognized. Studies done on intubated patients admitted to the ICU have
sure and potential for barotrauma, while during pressure­controlled ventilation, endobronchial intubation will result in a drop in tidal volumes and hypoventilation. Several stud­ies have found a decrease in oxygen saturation to be the most sensitive sign of endobronchial intubation,
1,9
though this
may be harder to recognize if using an FiO2 greater than 0.5.10
150
Superior thyroid notch
lobar bronchus
lobar bronchus
Branches of left
Tracheal mucosa
https://t.me/medicina_free
151
Superior horn of thyroid cartilage
(anterior view)
Branches of
right superior
Branches of
right middle
Right lamina of thyroid cartilage
Cricothyroid ligament
Arch of cricothyroid cartilage
Longitudinal folds of mucosa
Tracheal cartilage (cut) Cut edge of mucosa
Annular ligaments of trachea
Cricotracheal ligament
Tracheal bifurcation
Right main bronchus
Branches of
right inferior
lobar bronchus
Branches of left
inferior lobar
bronchus
Left lamina of thyroid cartilage
Inferior horn of thyroid cartilage
Cricothyroid articular capsule
Fibromuscular posterior wall
Tracheal cartilages
Tracheal cartilages
Left main bronchus
Bronchial cartilages
Tracheal mucosa
Trachea
(posterior view)
superior lobar bronchus
Figure19.1 Anatomy of the lower airways. The angle of the right main bronchus takeoff is more vertical than the left as 20– 30 degrees versus 40– 50 degrees from
midline. The right main bronchus is shorter and wider than the left main bronchus. SOURCE:Reproduced with permission from Drake RL, Vogl W, Mitchel A.Gray’s Atlas of
Anatomy. 2nd ed. Thorax; Figure86.
Interestingly, one study found that the most sensitive and specic means for detection was simply estimation of depth using tube markings. is group suggested using a depth at the corner of the mouth of 20cm for women and 22cm for men, except at extremes of height, in order to position the tube tip safely above the carina.7 Bronchoscopy can be used where there is ongoing doubt about endotracheal tube posi-
ENDOBRONCHIAL INTUBATION— MANAGEMENT
Once recognized, management of endobronchial intuba­tion is straightforward and involves movement of the endo­tracheal tube back into the tracheal position. Arecruitment maneuver should be considered to reexpand the nonventi­lated lung. and one should monitor for pneumothorax as a consequence of barotrauma to the ventilatedlung.
tion. Chest x- ray can also denitively assess endotracheal tube position in relation to the carina (Figure 19.2). Ultrasound is emerging as a versatile bedside imaging tool that has also been described in the conrmation of appropriate endotra­cheal tube position. is is generally accomplished by visu­alizing bilateral diaphragm movement or pleural sliding, though some have reported visualization of the cu itself when inated with saline.
MECHANICAL AIRFLOW DISRUPTION 151
11
AIRWAY FOREIGN BODY— INCIDENCE/ EPIDEMIOLOGY
Tracheobronchial foreign- body aspiration has a bimodal distribution of incidence, with most episodes occurring in children under 4years of age but a second increase in incidence in adults over the age of 75years. Other than
152
AB
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure19.2 Endobronchial intubation with left lung collapse (A). There is resolution of the collapse with repositioning of the endotracheal tube (B). While
this demonstrates severe collapse as a result of endobronchial intubation, many cases present with more subtle ndings of atelectasis in the poorly ventilatedlung.
age, risk factors include altered mental status, trauma, neuromuscular disorders, and dysphagia. Classically, most aspirated foreign bodies lodge in right main or lobar bronchi, though several studies have shown equal distribution between right and le bronchi.
12– 15
Food is the most common foreign body aspirated, oen nuts or seeds. Inorganic objects include teeth, dental appliances, and pills (Figure 19.3).
AIRWAY FOREIGN BODY— DIAGNOSIS
13,14,16– 19
e clinical presentation of tracheobronchial foreign body can range from acute asphyxia to chronic cough depending on the degree of obstruction caused by the object and the inammatory reaction it triggers. Auscultation may reveal unilateral wheezing or ronchi, or a discrepancy in breath sounds.
17,18
Children are more likely to present with acute, life- threatening symptoms caused by obstruction of the upper or proximal lower
is not elicited and patients are misdiagnosed with pneu­monia or asthma. Ahigh degree of clinical suspicion is therefore necessary, and the presence of a foreign body should be considered in the case of persistent or recurrent symptoms.
19,20
Most foreign bodies are radiolucent and therefore do
not show up on chest x- ray.
12,13,16,18,21
Computed tomog­raphy is more sensitive for the detection of radiolucent foreign objects in the airway,
13,14
and three- dimensional reformatting may oer even more sensitivity and specicity as well as enhance surgical planning.
13,15,22,23
Indirect signs of foreign- body aspiration include pneumonia, atelectasis, unilateral hyperination, or pneumothorax. Several stud­ies have shown that emphysema, or hyperination, is the most common radiographic sign and is the result of the object acting as a ball- valve, which eectively allows distal air entry upon inhalation but prevents air egress with exha-
15,16,21– 23
lation mon in cases of delayed presentation.
(Figure 19.4). Atelectasis may be more com-
16,18,23
airway (supraglottis, glottis, trachea), while adults more oen present with nonspecic signs such as cough or symptoms of pneumonia. Oen a history of aspiration
Figure19.3 Pill seen in right main bronchus on exible bronchoscopy.
152 PART IV. PULMONARY CRISES
Figure19.4 Foreign body in the right mainstem resulting in hyperination of the
right lung. Note the attening of the right hemidiaphragm and splaying of the right rib spaces. SOURCE:Reproduced with per mission from Digoy G.Diagnosis and
management of upper aerodigestive tract foreign bodies. Otolarngologic Clinics of North
America. 2008;41:485– 96.
https://t.me/medicina_free
153
AIRWAY FOREIGN BODY— MANAGEMENT
Management of foreign- body aspiration depends on clini­cal urgency. Acute, life- threatening asphyxia should be managed with attempts to clear the airway via abdominal thrusts (the Heimlich maneuver), back slaps, and chest thrusts according to resuscitation guidelines,
24,25
especially in the prehospital setting. Anger sweep to clear any visible upper airway material should also be performed, however a blind nger sweep is not recommended, as it can further advance unseen material. In an unconscious victim, cardio­pulmonary resuscitation should be initiated while continu­ing to attempt to clear and secure an airway.
In the hospital setting, urgent operative intervention should occur in any patient with respiratory distress or in patients suspected to be at risk of complete airway obstruc­tion due to the location or nature of the aspirated foreign body. If the patient is stable, it is reasonable to delay inter­vention so that gastric aspiration is potentially reduced by an overnight fast and so that experienced personnel and equipment can be made more readily available.
26,21
e patient should remain in a monitored setting, and the for­eign body should be removed as soon possible to reduce inammation and build up of granulation tissue.
In most cases, foreign body removal above the glottis is accomplished via laryngoscopy and below the glottis with rigid or exible bronchoscopy.
Rigid bronchoscopy is generally preferred for the removal of large obstructing foreign bodies in the cen­tral airways, or for complex foreign bodies that cannot be
removed with exible bronchoscopy. e rigid broncho­scope allows for continued ventilation via the side port and oers a large working channel through which instruments, suction, and the foreign body can pass (Figure 19.5). Rigid bronchoscopy requires general anesthesia, since patient movement and coughing must be avoided to prevent injury from the instrument. is may be achieved with the use of paralyzing agents, opioids, or increased depth of anesthesia.
Flexible bronchoscopy can assess both proximal and dis­tal airways and can be done in an awake or sedated patient with local anesthesia12 or under general anesthesia. e dis­advantages are the small working channel, which cannot support both suction and a retrieval instrument simultane­ously, and the possible need to withdraw and reintroduce the entire apparatus several times if removing pieces of foreign body. Additionally, there is no side port dedicated to ventilation, and thus ventilation must occur around the bronchoscope. Flexible bronchoscopy is preferred over rigid bronchoscopy in patients with non- life- threatening, distal foreign bodies; in those being mechanically venti­lated; and in situations where the manipulation of the head and neck that is required for rigid bronchoscopy would be problematic, such as patients with head and neck injuries or severe spinal stenosis. Close communication between the surgeon and the anesthesiologist is necessary, and all parties should be present upon induction of anesthesia. Multiple retrieval devices may be required and should be on hand, as should equipment for emergency tracheotomy or cricothyroidotomy.
Figure19.5 Rigid bronchoscope. The
rigid bronchoscope is available in various sizes. Alight source is connected to the scope, and ventilation can occur by connecting to the side port seen here at the top of the scope. Graspers and long suction devices pass through the center barrel/ working channel of thescope.
MECHANICAL AIRFLOW DISRUPTION 153
154
https://t.me/medicina_free
e major anesthetic considerations include the mode of induction and the maintenance of ventilation during the procedure. Additional consideration should be given to possible complications such as the conversion of a par­tial obstruction to a complete obstruction, and distal air­trapping from ball- valve eect during positive pressure ventilation. Anesthesia can be induced intravenously or via an inhalational route, and ventilation during the case can be spontaneous, assisted, or controlled. Studies have shown no dierence in outcome when positive pressure is used,27 though the theoretical risks of distal migration of the foreign body or air trapping should always be kept in mind, and maintenance of spontaneous respiration using an inhalational induction, or cautious intravenous induc­tion, may be optimal for a proximal foreign body that risks causing complete airway obstruction with migration.21 e airway may be secured with a supraglottic device, endotra-
Figure19.6 Foreign body with purulence and surrounding granulation tissue.
These objects may be more challenging to remove and steroids may be considered. SOURCE:Reproduced with per mission from Digoy GP. Diagnosis and
management of upper aerodigestive tract foreign bodies. Otolarngologic Clinics of North
America. 2008;41:485– 96.s
cheal tube, or rigid bronchoscope depending on the surgi­cal plan and clinical context. Muscle relaxants may be used to prevent patient movement and provide a “quiet” airway in cases where the maintenance of spontaneous respira­tion is not desired. Maintenance of anesthesia can occur via inhalational or intravenous route. An intravenous route is oen preferred, as it oers the advantage of continuous anesthetic depth without the interruption of delivery that occurs with inhalational anesthetic due to leak and airway manipulation. Propofol and remifentanil provide excel­lent short- term hypnosis, analgesia, and blunting of airway reexes and allow for a relatively rapid emergence.
be temporized by advancing the foreign body into a more distal airway to allow for ventilation of unobstructed air­ways. Subsequent attempts at removal can occur aer the patient becomes clinically stable. Unrecognized, the pres­ence of foreign objects in the airway will oen lead to recurrent pneumonias and bronchiectasis. Antibiotics and anti- inammatories are not usually given to patients with foreign- body aspiration. Antibiotics, however, are indicated in cases of documented respiratory tract infection, and a short course of steroids may be considered for foreign bod­ies that are encased in granulation tissue (Figure19.6).
AIRWAY FOREIGN BODY— COMPLICATIONS
CASE- BASED LEARNING DISCUSSION
e aspiration of inorganic objects, such as plastic or metal, can lead to direct airway injury and, rarely, perfora­tion. Organic material such as grains or vegetable matter can absorb uid over time resulting in worsening airway obstruction and clinical deterioration.18 Various organic and inorganic objects can also trigger a localized inam­matory reaction. is is seen commonly with aspiration of peanuts or sunower seeds secondary to the oil component and is also seen in the case of pill aspiration with medica­tions such as iron, potassium, and metformin, among oth­ers.28 Bronchoscopic evaluation in these cases will initially reveal signicant granulation tissue, which can subse­quently result in airway stenosis.
18,19
Apartial obstruction can turn into a complete obstruction due to swelling or to dislodgment of the foreign body spontaneously or dur­ing attempted retrieval. If the patient is unstable and the object is unable to be removed quickly, the situation can
154 PART IV. PULMONARY CRISES
1. Are there any patient- related concerns for anesthesia? What is your anestheticplan?
2. Aer uneventful induction and endotracheal intubation, the patient is prepped and draped and placed in reverse Trendelenberg position for surgery. Shortly aer insuation begins, there is an increase in peak airway pressure and a drop in oxygen saturation from 98% to 90%. End- tidal CO2 remains unchanged, as does systemic blood pressure. What is the dierential diagnosis? How would you evaluate the patient? What are your initial steps in management?
3: Auscultation of the lungs reveals decreased breath
sounds bilaterally without wheezes or crackles. Evaluation of the circuit and the endotracheal tube reveals no kinks in tubing. e endotracheal tube is
https://t.me/medicina_free
155
positioned at 23.5cm at the upper incisors. Pulling the tube back to 22cm results in a decrease in peak airway pressures and an increase in O2 saturation to 95%. What can you do to increase the O2 saturation? What are your concerns for the patient?
REFERENCES
1. McCoy EP, Russell WJ, Webb RK. Accidental bronchial intuba­tion:an analysis of AIMS incident reports from 1988 to 1994 inclu­sive. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:24– 31.
2. Al- Qahtani, AS, Messahel FM, Ouda, WO. Inadvertent endobron­chial intubation: a sentinel event. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2012; 6:259– 62.
3. Brunel W, Coleman DL, Schwartz DE, Peper E, Cohen NH. Assessment of routine chest roentgenograms and the physi­cal examination to conrm endotracheal tube position. Chest. 1989;96:1043– 5.
4. Conrardy PA, Goodman LR, Lainge F, Singer MM. Alteration of endotracheal tube position with exion and extension of the neck. Critical Care Medicine. 1976;4:8– 12.
5. Hartrey R, Kestin IG. Movement of oral and nasal tracheal tubes as a result of changes in head and neck position. Anaesthesia. 1995; 50:682– 7.
6. Iwama H, Nakane M, Aoki K, Watanabe K, Komatsu T. Abdominal insuation pressure during laparoscopic cholecys­tectomy shis the tracheal carina cephalad. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:491– 2.
7. Sitzwohl C, Langheinrich A, Schober A, etal. Endobronchial intu­bation detected by insertion depth of endotracheal tube, bilateral auscultation, or observation of chest movements:randomized trial. British Medical Journal. 2010;341:c5943.
8. Capnography.com.
9. Rolf N, Cote CJ. Diagnosis of clinically unrecognized endobron­chial intubation in paediatric anaesthesia: which is more sensi­tive, pulse oxymetry or capnography? Paediatric Anaesthesia. 1992;2:31– 5.
10 Barker S, Tremper KK, Hyatt J, Heitzmann H. Comparison of three
oxygen monitors in detecting endobronchial intubation. Journal of Clinical Monitors. 1988;4:240– 3.
11 Sustic A. Role of ultrasound in the airway management of critically
ill patients. Critical Care Medicine. 2007;35(Suppl):S173– 7.
12 Mise K, Savicevic A, Pavlov N, Jankovic S. Removal of tracheobron-
chial foreign bodies in adults using exible bronchoscopy: experi­ence 1995– 2006. Surgical Endoscopy. 2009;23:1360– 4.
13 Kim M, Lee KY, Lee KW, Bae KT. MDCT evaluation of foreign
bodies and liquid aspiration pneumonia in adults. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2008;190:907– 15.
14 Franquet T, Gimenez A, Roson N, Torrubia S, Sabate J, Perez C.
Aspiration diseases: ndings, pitfalls, and dierential diagnosis. RadioGraphics. 2000;20:673– 685.
15 Yang C, Hua R, Xu K, etal. e role of 3D computed tomography
(CT) imaging in the diagnosis of foreign body aspiration in child­ren. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2015;19:265– 73.
16 Tokar B, Ozkan R, Ilhan H. Tracheobronchial foreign bodies in
children: importance of accurate history and chest radiograph in delayed presentation. Clinical Radiology. 2004;59(7):609– 15.
17 Oncel M, Sunam GS, Ceran S. Tracheobronchial aspiration of
foreign bodies and rigid bronchoscopy in children. Pediatric International. 2012;54(4):532– 5.
18 Digoy GP. Diagnosis and management of upper aerodigestive
tract foreign bodies. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2008;41:485– 96.
19. Hu S, Lee JS, Pianosi PT, Ryu JH. Aspiration- related pulmonary syndromes. Chest. 2015;147:815– 23.
20 Ezer SS, Oguzkurt P, Ince E, Temiz A, Caliskan E, Hicsonmez A.
Foreign body aspiration in children:analysis of diagnostic criteria and accurate time for bronchoscopy. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2011;27(8):723– 6.
21 Fidowski C, Zheng H, Firth P. e anesthetic considerations of tra-
cheobronchial foreign bodies in children: a literature report and review of 12,979 cases. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2010; 111:1016– 25.
22 Tong B, Zhang L, Fang R, Sha Y, Chi F. 3D images based on MDCT
in evaluation of patients with suspected foreign body aspiration. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology. 2013;270:1001– 1007.
23 Hedge SV, Hui PKT, Lee EY. Tracheobronchial foreign bodies in
children: imaging assessment. Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MRI. 2015;36:8– 20.
24 Koster R. Part5: Adult basic life support 2010 international con-
sensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovas­cular care science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation. 2010;81S:e48– e70.
25 Heimlich HJ. A life- saving maneuver to prevent food- choking.
Journal of the American Medical Association. 1975;234(4): 398– 401.
26 Mani N, Soma M, Massey S, Albert D, Baily CM. Removal of
inhaled foreign bodies: middle of the night or the next morning? International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2009; 73:1085– 9.
27 Farrell PT. Rigid bronchoscopy for foreign body removal:anaesthe-
sia and ventilation. Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2004;14:84– 89.
28 Kupeli E, Khemasuwan D, Lee P, Mehta A. “Pills” and the air pas-
sages. Chest. 2013;144(2):651– 60.
MECHANICAL AIRFLOW DISRUPTION 155
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025