Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 468 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
33 Мб
Скачать
11 Advancing Immediate Dental Rehabilitation in Free Tissue Transfer Utilizing…
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.4 The tooth-borne oating prosthesis joined with the dental prosthesis
213
Fig. 11.5 Lateral view of the virtual prosthesis and oating guide. Note the highwater design required for soft tissue skin paddle inset and cleansability
For full-arch dental rehabilitation, the entire maxillary or mandibular arch is duplicated if the patient has reasonable preoperative dentition. Again, the data is taken from an intraoral scan, preoperative CBCT data, or digitization of physical stone models in articulation. If the patient does not have adequate dentition, then a virtual denture is made through a denture module in the software. The prosthesis is then smoothed and rened digitally. The digital implant abutments are again
214
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.6 The virtual implant abutments are digitally subtracted from the prosthesis using a Boolean difference function for intraoperative pickup. Note the inferior border offset to achieve the proper interocclusal restorative space
Fig. 11.7 Full-arch prosthesis pickup with contralateral arch 3D model prior to ap ischemia
D. Hammer et al.
subtracted from the prosthesis with a Boolean difference function for purposes of intraoperative pickup impression (Figs.11.7, 11.8, 11.9, and 11.10). The prosthesis is then 3D printed using biocompatible crown and bridge resin available from mul­tiple manufacturers or milled PMMA as described above.
11 Advancing Immediate Dental Rehabilitation in Free Tissue Transfer Utilizing…
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.8 Complete dental arch reconstruction using a combination of the patient’s existing denti­tion and digitally created teeth
215
Fig. 11.9 Full-arch reconstruction. The second molars were left until time of pickup. This pro­vides a stable occlusal stop to conrm the correct vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO). The second molars will be removed before nal inset of the prosthesis
216
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.10 Poly(methyl methacrylate) milled immediate full-arch prosthesis
D. Hammer et al.
Intraoperative Technique
A defect model, bula cutting guide, mandible or maxilla cutting guide, and custom reconstruction plate are requested from the vendor used for the initial VSP panning session. A preoperative t check on the defect model is performed to ensure correct positioning of implants and prosthesis. The defect model should have predictive holes to attach the plate and bula construct. Intraoperatively, it is imperative that the resection and bula cutting guides are placed at the surgical sites according to the preoperative plan. The bula cutting guide is then secured, predictive holes are drilled, and then the guided dental implants are placed. Following these steps, the closing osteotomies are created with a surgical saw.
The bula segments are then t into the defect model and secured to the custom plate. Straight multiunit abutments are placed on the implants and torqued to manu­facturer’s specications. Temporary copings are then placed on the multiunit abut­ments in preparation for attachment of the prosthesis. The tooth-borne guided “oating prosthesis” is placed on the printed STL defect model. A pickup impres­sion is performed, and the prosthesis is removed and converted. At that time, the ap is divided and transferred to the head and neck. In cases where the full dental arch is being reconstructed, the prosthesis can be picked up utilizing a 3D-printed skull model with hinged opposing and vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) stops (Fig.11.11). Alternatively, the prosthesis can also be picked up intraorally. While this can be more difcult due to the constraints of operating with limited space within the intraoral surgical eld, the occlusion is more accurate and requires mini­mal nal adjustment.
11 Advancing Immediate Dental Rehabilitation in Free Tissue Transfer Utilizing…
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.11 Full-arch pickup performed at the donor site. A hinged model is used to provide oppos­ing dentition
217
Postoperative Digital Workow: Naval Medical Center Rapid Restorative Protocol
At the time of surgery, the pre-manufactured prosthesis is converted to a xed con­version dental prosthesis by xating multiunit abutment temporary cylinders to the dental prosthesis with autocure acrylic. After the prosthesis is disinfected and taken to the dental laboratory for completion of the conversion, a check-cast of the multi­unit abutment analog positions is poured in low-expansion type IV die stone. The intaglio contours of the prosthesis are rounded, hygienically contoured, and pol­ished. In addition, multiunit abutment impression scan bodies are attached to the conversion prosthesis and scanned in the desktop scanner that provides surface scan data of the cameo and intaglio surfaces of the prosthesis and its relationship to the multiunit abutment platforms (Fig.11.12).
After an appropriate amount of time has elapsed as deemed by the surgeon for restorative recall, maxillomandibular relationship records are made with an intra­oral scanner after any additional occlusal adjustments are required (Fig.11.13). The conversion prosthesis is then removed and the soft tissue is inspected for areas of concern. Corresponding areas of the intaglio surface of the prosthesis are adjusted and polished as appropriate, all multiunit abutments are re-torqued to manufactur­er’s specications, and the conversion prosthesis is reinserted intraorally and ana­lyzed for passivity to the multiunit abutments. A PVS wash of the intaglio of the conversion prosthesis or nal impression using splinted impression copings and custom tray can also be made to capture the respective soft tissue if indicated. Pre­manufactured verication jigs made from the surgical check cast are then luted intraorally using autocure acrylic to verify passivity of the nal master cast. The conversion prosthesis is then disinfected and taken to the dental laboratory, and a nal master cast is poured in a low-expansion type IV die stone using the veried passive conversion prosthesis or splinted impression copings with multiunit ana­logs. The conversion prosthesis is then scanned on a desktop scanner individually and attached to the master cast that captures the cameo and intaglio surfaces and its relationship to the veried master cast (Fig.11.14).
218
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.12 The scanned STL le of the temporary prosthesis to use for fabrication of the nal prosthesis
D. Hammer et al.
Fig. 11.13 Maxillomandibular relationship records of the conversion prosthesis and opposing dentition made with an intraoral scanner
11 Advancing Immediate Dental Rehabilitation in Free Tissue Transfer Utilizing…
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.14 Desktop scan of the conversion prosthesis indexed to the veried master cast
Fig. 11.15 The master cast is then registered to the opposing dentition in the restorative maxillomandibular relationship using the conversion prosthesis as the constant duciary surface
219
These STL models can then be registered within the CAD software for an accu­rate relationship to each other, and all les are sent to the dental laboratory for manufacture of a denitive prosthesis along with the veried stone master cast for verication of the metal framework milling accuracy (Fig.11.15). The prosthesis
220
https://t.me/medicina_free
D. Hammer et al.
design consists of a milled titanium substructure enhanced by vertical retention grooves with a denitive suprastructure that replicates the presurgical anatomy and occlusion if available made from zirconia or milled PMMA.A 2mm bilayer pres­sure form matrix occlusal guard is also fabricated to the prosthesis and delivered to the patient upon delivery of the denitive prosthesis (Figs. 11.16 and 11.17).
Fig. 11.16 Final prosthesis
Fig. 11.17 Delivery of prosthesis 14weeks postoperatively
11 Advancing Immediate Dental Rehabilitation in Free Tissue Transfer Utilizing…
https://t.me/medicina_free
221
Homecare instructions are reinforced, and the recall regimen is customized per patient requirements. This protocol has enabled delivery of a nal dental prosthesis in less than 4months postoperatively.
Future Directions
Currently, we strive to complete dental rehabilitation with nal prosthesis delivery within 4months of surgery. The nal prostheses can be delivered following implant integration torque testing. With the use of digital workow and in-house 3D print­ing, rapid design and fabrication can be achieved even in the time constraints of malignancy. As technology continues to advance, the workow will continue to simplify and improve accuracy. Thus, patients will benet from early return to func­tion as immediate maxillofacial reconstruction becomes common practice.
References
1. Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ, Hidalgo DA, Hu QY. Reconstruction of the mandible with osse­ous free aps: a 10-year experience with 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(5):1314–20.
2. Li B, Byun S, Kim S, Lee J.The clinical outcome of dental implants placed through skin aps. Head Neck. 2014;151(6):945–51.
3. Nooh N.Dental implant survival in irradiated oral cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:1233–42.
4. Ch’ng S, Skoracki RJ, Selber JC, etal. Osseointegrated implant based dental rehabilitation in head and neck reconstruction patients. Head Neck. 2016;38:E321–E32.
5. Wei FC, Santamaria E, Chang YM, etal. Mandibular reconstruction with bular osteoseptocu­taneous free ap and simultaneous placement of osseointegrated dental implants. J Craniofac Surg. 1997;8:512–21.
6. Hirsch D, Garfein E, Christianswn A, etal. Use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to produce orthognathically ideal surgical outcomes: a paradigm shift in head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2115–22.
7. Hutchison I.Saving faces: a facial surgeon’s craft (Video); pc.tedcdn.com/talk/stream/2010G/
Blank/IainHutchison_2010G- 1500k.mp4. Accessed 14 Nov 2021.
8. Hutchison I, Dawood A.Maxillofacial treatments; www.dawoodandtanner.co.uk/maxillofacial.
9. Sclaroff A, Haughhey B, Gay WD, Paniello R. Immediate mandibular reconstruction and placement of dental implants: at the time of ablative surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;78:711–7.
10. Qaisi M, Kolodney H, Swedenburg G, Chandran R, Caloss R.Fibula jaw in a day: state of the art in maxillofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:1284.e1–1284.e15.
11. Anolik R, Nelson J, Rosen E, etal. Immediate dental implant placement in the oncologic set­ting: a conceptual framework. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(9):e3671.
12. Sandoval M, Rosen E, Robert A, etal. Immediate dental implants in bula free aps to recon­struct the mandible: a pilot study of the short‐term effects on radiotherapy for patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;22:91–5.
13. Landes CA, Kovacs AF.Comparison of early telescope loading of non-submerged ITI implants in irradiated and non-irradiated oral cancer subjects. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:367–74.
222
https://t.me/medicina_free
14. Jackson R, Price D, Arce K, Moore E.Evaluation of clinical outcomes of osseointegrated dental implantation of bula free aps for mandibular reconstruction. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18(3):201–6.
15. Ch’ng S, Skoracki R, Selber J, Yu P, etal. Osseointegrated implant-based dental rehabilitation in head and neck reconstruction patients. Head Neck. 2016;38:21–7.
16. Allen R, Shenaq D, Rosen E, etal. Immediate dental implantation in oncologic jaw reconstruc­tion: workow optimization to decrease time to full dental rehabilitation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7:1–4.
17. Williams FC, Hammer DA, Wentland TR, Kim RY.Immediate teeth in bulas: planning and digital workow with point-of-care 3D printing. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(8):1320–7.
D. Hammer et al.
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025