Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 318 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
58 Мб
Скачать
Practical Approach toREBOA
https://t.me/medicina_free
23
LauriHandolin , VilleVänni , andViktorReva
23.1 Introduction
REBOA (resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta) is an adjunct for haemorrhage control and resuscita­tion in patients with signicant non-compressible torso haemorrhage (NCTH) who are at risk of imminent cardio­vascular collapse and cardiopulmonary arrest. Even though the rst report of intra-aortic balloon occlusion dates back to Korean War, the method did not gain popularity that time, and far more invasive resuscitative thoracic aorta clamping took the place as a golden standard in supporting the collaps­ing haemodynamics in critically injured patients. During the last decade, there has been an increased interest in REBOA, and low-prole trauma-specic balloons have become com­mercially available.
Conventionally, the REBOA balloon is introduced into the abdominal or thoracic aorta through a femoral introducer sheath placed into the common femoral artery. The aimed balloon deployment zone is located either blindly or under uoroscopic guidance. The occluding effect of balloon is related to the balloon ination compared to aortic diameter and variating from different levels of partial occlusion to the total occlusion. Occlusion can be released intermittently or kept in place non-intermittently.
REBOA is not stopping the bleeding and not a curative procedure in itself. However, REBOA is a powerful tool in the toolbox of methods supporting the bleeding patient and buying time for gaining the denitive bleeding control. The decision to use REBOA practically means that the team must simultaneously decide which key emergency bleeding con­trol procedure will follow the balloon deployment. Practical
L. Handolin (*) · V. Vänni Trauma Unit, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland e-mail: lauri.handolin@hus.
V. Reva Department of War Surgery, Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
use of REBOA means understanding the benets and disad­vantages of the method. REBOA has major wanted and non­wanted physiological effects and consequences. It is important to have the knowledge how REBOA is introduced and deployed in aimed aortic location, but furthermore it is absolutely vital to understand and be aware of the conse­quences and complications of the procedure. Some of the critical patients will probably benet from REBOA, but the balloon must be deployed in a right way, in a right time and for the right patient.
Overuse of this powerful method will lead to unnecessary morbidity and even mortality. On the other hand, if REBOA is used too late as a last resort attempt to save the dying patient, there will be no benet of all, when the inevitable death is just pushed few minutes forwards. The aim of this chapter is to focus on practical issues on REBOA in penetrat­ing trauma patients in terms of getting the most benet from it and minimizing the disadvantageous consequences.
23.2 The Physiological Eects ofAortic
Balloon Occlusion
Physiological effects of aortic balloon occlusion equal to cross clamping the aorta. It is used to provide cardiovascular support for a critically shocked trauma patient by increasing the cardiac afterload, coronary perfusion and blood pressure above the occlusion site. The cardiovascular support is lesser in lower abdominal aortic occlusion compared to thoracic occlusion. In addition to the cardiovascular support, aortic occlusion decreases the blood pressure distal to the occlu­sion site and provides thus varying amount of proximal bleeding control for arterial bleedings. The proximal bleed­ing control effect is related to the distance of the occlusion site and arterial injury site—the longer the distance is, less proximal bleeding control is gained due to the back bleeding from communicating arterial branches.
Occluding the thoracic aorta causes distal ischaemia below the occlusion site. Long-term occlusion is associated
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 E. Degiannis et al. (eds.), Penetrating Trauma, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47006-6_23
191
192
https://t.me/medicina_free
with ischaemia-reperfusion injury and potentially increased risk of death. This means that there is a maximal duration of REBOA-related profound distal ischemia patient can toler­ate. Unfortunately, the maximal tolerated REBOA occlusion time is not exactly known. The time varies from patient to patient due to multiple reasons—patient’s physiological resources, patient’s inherent ability to withstand ischaemia and the duration and severeness of pre-REBOA hypoperfusion state all contribute to the maximal tolerated occlusion time.
Animal data and limited human data suggests that periods of thoracic aorta occlusion exceeding 40min can result in irreversible organ injury and death. Experienced clinicians­based consensus is that aim should be to minimize occlusion time as short as possible. The maximal tolerated occlusion time is considered to be around 30min in supra-diaphrag­matic occlusion (zone 1) and 60–90min in infrarenal aorta (zone 3) (Figs.23.1 and 23.2). It has been seen in clinical retrospective analysis that the time from balloon ination to deation, the so-called balloon time, was shorter in survivors compared to non-survivors. That may be related to the more severe reperfusion injuries due to a longer balloon time, but also to the severity of the injuries, since longer balloon times are probably needed in more severe cases. Also, longer occlusion time has been related to increased release of inter­leukin- 6 in animal studies. Elevated cytokine levels are increasing the incidence of multiorgan failure risk, which is related to overall survival.
The systemic ischaemia after balloon ination is not the only unwanted physiological consequence. In case of a pos­sible bleeding source above the occlusion site, the increased mean arterial pressure will result in increased bleeding.
Fig. 23.1 Left picture shows contrast lled REBOA balloon in zone 1. Zone 3 balloon in pelvic fracture with external C-clamp on the right. Note the manual xation of the catheter shaft preventing from balloon migration before the shaft has been secured properly
L. Handolin et al.
Fig. 23.2 Left picture shows contrast lled REBOA balloon in zone 1. Zone 3 balloon in pelvic fracture with external C-clamp on the right. Note the manual xation of the catheter shaft preventing from balloon migration before the shaft has been secured properly
Sudden and very high (even supraphysiologic) increase in blood pressure is related especially to supra-diaphragmatic zone 1 total occlusion. Increased afterload results in increased oxygen consumption of the heart, and the sudden increase into detrimentally high blood pressure may put the heart under non-tolerable exertion and contribute to cardiac fail­ure. The patients with pre-existing cardiac condition are more prone to these adverse effects. The systemic effects of REBOA are less dramatic and dissipated in abdominal aorta zone 3 occlusion.
The effects of balloon deation are causing sudden car­diovascular derangements. Systemic blood pressure decreases as the cold, acidotic blood is ushed back to cir­culation from visceral circulation and lower extremities below the previous occlusion. The reperfused blood con­tains elevated levels of carbon dioxide, lactate and potas­sium, nitric oxide, other ischaemic metabolites and pro-inammatory mediators. These cause vasodilation, decreased cardiac contractility and hypotension. In the worst case, this may result in non-tolerable haemodynamic collapse.
Aortic occlusion and the following release of the occlu­sion (reperfusion) have a major effect on the amount of per­fused tissue. The sudden changes in amount of perfused tissue affect the amount of ventilation required to oxygenate the circulating volume. Decreased amount of perfused tissue will produce less carbon dioxide. Especially in mechanically ventilated patients, this leads to hyperventilation if the venti­lation is not adjusted accordingly. Conversely, after the bal­loon deation, the increased amount of perfused tissue will
23 Practical Approach toREBOA
https://t.me/medicina_free
yield an opposite effect and lead to hypoventilation. All major deviations from the level of normoventilation are potentially harmful for the critically ill patient and should be avoided.
23.3 Team Approach Is Crucial intheUse ofREBOA
Proper and well-timed teamwork is essential in treatment of every severely injured patient. Team preparedness must start long before a patient is arriving—it is an issue of institutional protocol, agreement, dry and wet lab training. Upon patient admission, once the decision is made, the REBOA needs to be deployed immediately by the personnel available in-house 24/7. This highlights the need of multidisciplinary team approach, where at least one or two attending team members must have the capability of performing the vascular access and REBOA balloon deployment. Developing a structured learning system for in-hospital trauma team members and regular multidisciplinary training increases team prepared­ness and the overall REBOA capability amongst the attend­ing personnel.
During the admissions of critically injured patient, the resuscitation team becomes busy with the urgent resuscita­tive and supportive measures. If REBOA is decided to be used and applied by the original team members, that add-on procedure will naturally prolong the time the team needs to work on the patient for some extra minutes. To save that time, the alternative strategy is to have a special add-on REBOA team (Fig.23.3) supporting the original team and focusing only on the vascular access, balloon deployment and balloon ination-deation adjustment. Special REBOA team is a valuable supportive resource for resuscitation teams but may not be applicable in all systems due to a limited number of human personnel.
Aortic occlusion causes sudden and dramatic changes in patient’s physiology. The basic elements of teamwork, such as communication and updated knowledge on the past, cur­rent and planned proceedings, must be crystal clear for the entire resuscitation team all the time. It is vital to have con­tinuous communication and maintain the situational aware­ness between REBOA and anaesthetic teams to be able to understand and interpret the changes in patient’s circulatory state. Increase in blood pressure may be due to balloon occlusion or vasopressors, or both. On the other hand, decreasing blood pressure does not unambiguously mean that the effect of balloon is decreasing, but may be due to decreased vasopressors.
The balloon deation is a delicate phase in the REBOA procedure. The anaesthesia team needs to have time to
193
Fig. 23.3 REBOA team doctor (blue vest) is preparing the puncture set to establish an arterial access during primary survey resuscitation, whilst assistant (white-orange vest) is doing emergency scrub for the right groin
prepare for the cardiovascular effects of reperfusion. For that reason, the deation begins only after detailed com­munication and planning together with the surgical team. Upon deation, the surgical team must maintain the abil­ity for immediate reination of the balloon in case of car­diovascular collapse. The optimally smooth deation phase and minimized haemodynamical consequences mandate for constant situational awareness and orches­trated teamwork.
Balloon ination leads to dramatically decreased amount of perfused tissue and amount of carbon dioxide in circulat­ing blood. This may lead to disadvantageous hyperventila­tion unless anaesthetic team is not aware and prepared for the aortic occlusion. The opposite will happen in balloon dea­tion due to sudden increase in the amount of perfused tissue, and ventilation will not maintain in sufcient level unless the anaesthetic team is not prepared to adjust it. Especially, if the patient has concomitant intracranial injury, hypoventilation will result in vasodilatation in veins and increased intracra­nial pressure.
194
https://t.me/medicina_free
L. Handolin et al.
23.4 The REBOA Procedure
The REBOA procedure can be divided into six practical operative stages:
1. Preparation of the sheath and balloon catheter
2. Gaining arterial access and sheath introduction
3. Deployment of the REBOA device into a targeted aortic zone
4. Balloon ination
5. Balloon deation
6. REBOA device and sheath removal
23.4.1 Preparation oftheSheath andBalloon
Catheter
Ideally, the preparation of REBOA is assigned to a special­ized REBOA team member not being primarily involved in a resuscitation of the critically ill patient. To set specic ready­to- go vascular access kits and a REBOA kit rather than sepa­rate elements in an emergency room is highly recommended. It should contain at least a 18G puncture needle, an intro­ducer sheath (including a sheath, a dilator and a mini­guidewire), compatible long wires (if applicable—some modern catheter does not require wire insertion), the REBOA catheter, a few 10–20mL syringes and contrast medium. Compatible guidewires and introducer sheath, as well as bal­loon ination medium (preferably a contrast medium diluted with normal saline in 1:2 ratio), are prepared alongside with the invasive blood pressure measurement line (if applicable).
bleeding site can be addressed with multiple closure tech­niques, whereas the bleeding from EIA is non-compressible and more difcult to repair.
The puncture can be done ultrasound (US)-guided, via open cut-down, or by blind puncture. US-guided technique is preferrable if appropriate US device with linear probe and enough experience is available. The depth of US eld must be set deep enough to see the femoral head. In optimal sce­nario, both the bifurcation of supercial and deep femoral arteries and the femoral head can be visualized. The CFA should be ideally punctured just above the level of the centre of the femoral head at 12 o’clock at a 30–45° angle. Spurting blood return demonstrates a correct position of the needle tip inside the artery and enables the guidewire placement using the Seldinger technique (Fig.23.4). A sheath, either small one (4–5 Fr) or REBOA-compatible larger one (7–8 Fr), is then inserted over the wire. The smaller sheath can be used for invasive blood pressure monitoring and, if clinically required, upsized to larger REBOA-compatible sheath using over-the-wire technique. After the correct placement of the sheath is cleared, the sheath must be secured properly (Fig.23.5).
Ultrasound-guided puncture may not be easy in grossly hypovolemic vasoconstricted patients. Therefore, the team should be ready for open cut-down to proceed with the
23.4.2 Gaining Arterial Access andSheath Introduction
Establishing the arterial access is the pivotal moment in REBOA procedure. Tactical and technical mistakes during arterial access may lead to disastrous complications, pitfalls and wasted time, so the access method needs to be familiar, and there should be an immediate fallback option available. A 2-min attempt for successful puncture followed by a 2-min attempt at the contralateral side (in case of primary failure) is justied to avoid time-wasting.
The aimed puncture site is in the common femoral artery (CFA). Puncture to supercial femoral artery (SFA) should be avoided because of smaller calibre of the artery and thus increased risk of puncture site complications. Also, so-called high puncture above the inguinal ligament into the external iliac artery (EIA) must be avoided due to the higher risk of retroperitoneal bleeding. Post-puncture bleeding from CFA is usually easily controlled by manual pressure, and the
Fig. 23.4 Femoral artery access. Spurting blood return and sheath’s mini-guidewire insertion. Puncture is done under US (ultrasound) guid­ance in team approach manner, where the resuscitation team’s radiolo­gist is providing the US view of the CFA after nishing the eFAST examination
23 Practical Approach toREBOA
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 23.5 Sheath must be properly secured. One fast way is to use skin clips for securing it. Note the femoral vein access that was established after accidental venous puncture during CFA puncture attempt
“semi-Seldinger” technique, where the anterior wall of the CFA is exposed and punctured under direct visualization. Currently, almost 50% of vascular accesses for trauma REBOA are performed via a cut-down. In critical scenario with less US puncture experience, the open cut-down is likely the most feasible technique in gaining fast arterial access.
There are clinical scenarios where the need for REBOA may arise intraoperatively. It does not necessarily mean femoral arterial access. During challenging laparotomy, the access can be achieved via intra-abdominal aortic or iliac artery puncture. However, these approaches render the external landmarks useless for determining desired depth, so the conrmation of the balloon position should be done either with manual palpation upon ination or with uoros­copy. Also, it might be linked to certain undesirable com­plications: puncture site leaking (difcult to control compared to the CFA), aortic dissection or injury, so the decision which access is optimal for using should be weighed.
23.4.3 Deployment oftheREBOA Device into
aTargeted Aortic Zone
Balloon occlusion can be achieved with a multitude of differ­ent devices ranging from an improvised Fogarty catheter bal­loon to highly sophisticated, purpose-built REBOA kits. Therefore, it is essential to familiarize oneself with the device at hand and the specic device-related steps there are. Different REBOA catheter systems are used differently. The classical over-the-wire catheters are designed to be used under uoroscopy guidance. The modern devices, specially developed for trauma purposes, are designed for blind inser­tion without uoroscopy. In blind balloon catheter insertion,
195
the use of the guidewire is dependent on the commercial device at hand; if the device is designed for over-the-wire use, it must not be advanced without the wire preventing from intimal tear and dissection caused by a tip of the cath­eter. Most of the REBOA procedures are done outside hybrid facilities; thus, the balloon catheters having soft J-tip end designed for the blind wireless technique are preferred.
In blind technique, the catheter depth and correct posi­tioning of the balloon can be achieved in two methods, using either predetermined depth or external landmarks. Commercial devices usually have depth insertion markers on the catheter representing the distance from the (middle of the) balloon. In adult patients with normal torso height, an approximate distance of 46cm from the groin insertion site represents balloon landing at descending thoracic aorta above the celiac axis (zone 1). For zone 3, an approximate of 28cm will generally allow the balloon to land above the aor­tic bifurcation but below the renal arteries. External land­marks for pre-determining catheter depth means measuring the length from the insertion site to the targeted landmark. Mid-sternum (above xiphoid process and below suprasternal notch) serves as external landmark for zone 1, whereas umbilicus serves as landmark for zone 3 (Illustration 23.1). The measuring can be done using catheter insertion cm­markers (Fig.23.6) and may be a preferrable method due to the ability to address the actual height of the patient’s torso. The measured length will represent the insertion depth from the middle of the balloon, not from the catheter tip.
23.4.4 Balloon Ination
Once the desired depth is reached, the balloon is slowly inated with saline or 50:50 saline-contrast media solution. Contrast media is not mandatory but will help to locate the balloon in X-ray if the catheter does not have radiopaque markers. Ination volume differs between balloon catheters, aortic diameters in different zones and age groups, as well as the aimed level of occlusion (total vs partial). The maximum volume of the balloon differs from balloon to balloon and must not be exceeded. The overination may lead to iatro­genic aortic and device-related fatal complications. Any abnormal or increasing resistance during lling of the bal­loon prompts for immediate stop of lling.
In total occlusion, the loss of palpable pulse in contralat­eral groin will indicate the needed ination volume. In par­tial occlusion, the rough estimate of the needed volume is gained by deating the total occlusion slowly until the point where the groin pulse starts to be palpable again. Also, the increase in blood pressure, especially in zone 1 deployment, can guide to stop the lling at desired point. When lling the balloon, the catheter must be held in place to prevent migra­tion due to “hitting” aortic pulse wave against the balloon.
196
Zone 3
Umbilicus Xiphoid
Zone 2 Zone 1
https://t.me/medicina_free
Illustration 23.1 Showing the general concept of the REBOA, targeted landing zones in aorta and external landmarks for both zones 1 and 3
Fig. 23.6 Using xiphoid process as an external landmark to measure desired depth for zone 1 balloon deployment. Note open cut-down for arterial access in the right groin in arresting patient with mechanical chest compression device
L. Handolin et al.
reperfusion burden and not exceed 30 min for zone 1 and 60min for zone 3. Release of the occlusion is a critical moment and must not be done suddenly. The following reperfusion and sudden drop in blood pressure with the risk of circulatory col­lapse may be reduced with slow and staged deation protocol. Staged slow deation with 2mL withdraws every 20–30 s with concomitant blood pressure monitoring will provide the patient’s physiology some time to adopt to changing situation, as well as time for the anaesthesia team to escalate the cardio­vascular and ventilatory supportive measures. The need for clear communication and constant situational awareness within the whole team is mandatory as well as the capability to re-inate the balloon if needed.
23.4.6 REBOA Device andSheath Removal
This “hammer effect” mandates the constant xing of the catheter shaft at desired depth during the whole balloon ination time. The securing of the shaft can be done with strong adhesive tapes, sutures and central catheter clips or held by hand.
For situational awareness, the time of ination must be noted. Especially in zone 1, the balloon should not be inated continuously for more than 30min. Intermittent deation of the balloon in zone I may help decreasing the ischaemic con­sequences to the kidney and abdominal organs.
23.4.5 Balloon Deation
Balloon deation should be done as soon as adequate haemor­rhage control has been achieved to prevent severe ischaemia-
Any catheter or sheath inserted into vessels provoke throm­bogenesis and increase the risks of arterial thrombosis with disastrous complications. Exsanguinated patients are typi­cally coagulopathic which diminishes risks of early throm­bosis, but as soon as the patient is stabilized, the risk of thrombogenic complications increases. Therefore, the REBOA catheter should be withdrawn as early as clinically possible. Large-bore introducer sheath (>8 Fr) should also be removed before patient transport to the ICU. The smaller sheaths cause less complications and, if prompted by the patient’s condition, can be left for a few hours more until the need for redeployment has been decimated.
The sheath must not be ushed upon removal due to the risk of ushing sheath’s intraluminal thrombus into the arte­rial system. Instead, aspiration prior to sheath removal may reduce the risk of possible sheath tip’s thrombus escape.
23 Practical Approach toREBOA
https://t.me/medicina_free
197
Larger sheaths (>8 Fr) require specic measures to be applied for vascular access closure such as open exploration with direct repair, fascia closure technique or vascular closure devices. Smaller sheaths (<8 Fr) may usually be safely removed by manual compression for 10min even in severe trauma patients with coagulation decits. However, smaller 6- or 8-Fr closure devices are widely available and easy to use. If any difculty is encountered when removing the cath­eter, the catheter and the introducer sheath should be removed as a unit. In open cut-down, the puncture site cannot be con­trolled by pressure and needs surgical closure.
Close 24-h monitoring of the lower extremity perfusion and the puncture site is mandatory. Despite severe complica­tions, as amputations, being uncommon and decreased risk of thromboembolic complications with modern smaller size sheaths (7 Fr), the risk of complications still exists. Usually, the treatment for this means a combination of thrombectomy, endarterectomy and/or patch angioplasty for the CFA.
23.5 Indications andContraindications
During the Korean War, Lieutenant Colonel Carl Hughes used the technique of introducing a balloon catheter into the aorta through open access in femoral artery. This technique was used in treatment of two moribund casualties, both suf­fering from an abdominal gunshot wound. Both patients were admitted with 40 mmHg SBP, underwent massive blood transfusion and were taken to surgery with critical hypotension and undetectable BP.Despite the initial positive haemodynamic response from catheter occlusion, both patients ultimately died. In his documentation, Hughes con­templated potential indications for the procedure: severe shock and moribund patient status (considered to be with SBP < 60–70mm Hg), evidence of intra-abdominal bleed­ing, inability to control BP after administration of 10units of blood or other causes of severe shock when centralization of perfusion into vital organs is urgently required.
There are two groups of effects that are sought after with practical use of REBOA:
1. Cardiovascular resuscitative effects: (a) Support in haemodynamics in severe hypotension
• Prevention of post-induction hypotension
• Prevention of laparotomy-associated hypotension (associated with abdominal compartment release)
• Decreasing the extensive use of vasopressors
2. Operative surgery-related effects:
• Control of haemorrhage
• Proximal aortic control (replacing thoracic aortic clamping)
• Reduction of blood transfusion requirements
23.5.1 Indications
Since then, the most common indication for REBOA has been critical haemodynamic instability and impending cardiac arrest. However, the use of REBOA at peri-arrest state will result in selection bias—patients with extremely severe inju­ries will have the highest probability of death, and thus the overall use of REBOA may easily be considered as futile. The abovementioned casualties and many trauma patients after­wards have been too sick to survive despite endovascular aor­tic balloon occlusion. However, the development of endovascular surgery and the REBOA technique itself along­side with novel low-prole catheters on the market has led to broadening of the haemodynamic envelope for REBOA.This has elevated the threshold of systolic BP for REBOA up to 90mmHg. Certainly, trauma patients admitted with the sys­tolic BP of 70–90 mmHg require specic focus on haemo­static measures and are most likely to benet from early haemorrhage control.
Compared to the Hughes data (where balloon occlusion was performed after resuscitation efforts in combat environ­ment), today’s practice has been shifting towards early vas­cular access and balloon deployment as soon as feasible. There is some evidence that early vascular access, performed within the rst 20min from patient’s admission, with subse­quent REBOA and other endovascular life-saving interven­tions, may improve survival.
Patient’s haemodynamic state can be divided into differ­ent levels of preparedness for REBOA, and the procedure can be swiftly advanced according to progression in haemo­dynamic state (Table23.1).
Patients with exsanguinating subdiaphragmatic injuries (abdominal, pelvic or lower extremity junctional injuries) are potential candidates for REBOA. Critically unstable patients are at high risk of cardiac arrest during anaesthesia induction, and thus mechanical elevation of BP with improved coronary perfusion may help to avoid it. Another possible application of balloon occlusion is an intraoperative REBOA when the control of a major haemorrhage is techni­cally challenging or exploration of major retroperitoneal haematoma is warranted.
Table 23.1 REBOA preparedness levels according to systolic blood pressure
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg Decision
>90 Consider/prepare femoral arterial access 90–80 Insertion of a femoral arterial sheath 80–70 Insertion of a balloon catheter 70–60 Immediate balloon ination in a target
zone (zone 1 or zone 3)
<60 Immediate balloon ination in zone 1
198
https://t.me/medicina_free
Illustration 23.2 A simple decision-making algorithm for REBOA in penetrating injuries according to patient’s hemodynamic status and penetrating wound location
L. Handolin et al.
In a crashing patient with penetrating wounds below the xyphoid process, REBOA can be used to replace the need for anterolateral thoracotomy and aortic cross-clamping. The horizontal plane at the level of the xyphoid process can be used as external landmark that divides the supra- and subdia­phragmatic areas. The xyphoid process has proven to be both safe and practical landmark for early decision to initiate the REBOA procedure in penetrating trauma (Illustration 23.2).
In abdominal penetrating injuries, there is a theoretical risk of iatrogenic aortic injury if the balloon catheter is passed into the pre-existing aortic wall injury. This risk can be minimized if the procedure is performed by an experi­enced operator and under uoroscopic guidance, and if the procedure is discontinued if any resistance during the wire or catheter insertion is met. In penetrating injury with suspected iliac artery injury, contralateral vascular access should be performed to avoid iatrogenic injuries.
In high-volume endovascular units routinely familiar with upper extremity arterial access, the use of left upper extrem­ity for balloon entry will mitigate the risk for iatrogenic aor­tic injuries in case of penetrating abdominal injuries. However, for safe implementation, a certain level of exper­tise and uoroscopy are required, and thus the transbrachial access is not recommended as rst-line option in routine practice.
Summary of indications for REBOA in penetrating trauma:
• Wound location below the plane of xyphoid process in suspected major arterial injury in the abdomen or pelvis
• Severe shock (SBP <90–70 mm Hg) due to non­compressible torso haemorrhage with no response to uid/blood resuscitation
• Cardiac arrest or impending cardiac arrest (with no or low probability of cardiac or chest injury)
• Major junctional lower extremity or perineal injury
• Uncontrolled intraoperative abdominal or pelvic bleeding
• Major retroperitoneal midline (zone 1) hematoma
23.5.2 Contraindications
It is practical to divide the bleeders into supra- and subdia­phragmatic categories as ongoing haemorrhages from neck and chest injuries are contraindications for REBOA.REBOA, or any aortic occlusion, will elevate the BP above the zone of occlusion and thus lead to increased bleeding from injuries located above the occlusion. In penetrating injury to the chest with haemodynamic instability, there is always a risk of cardiac injury. Aortic balloon ination and aortic occlu­sion may increase the risk of cardiac tamponade in case of penetrating cardiac injury, thus decreasing the probability of survival. Thoraco-abdominal injuries should also warrant high level of suspicion and caution in decision-making. In
23 Practical Approach toREBOA
https://t.me/medicina_free
199
such cases, extended FAST ultrasound may help to rule out possible signs of chest pathology such as major haemothorax or pericardial uid. Positive e-FAST ndings in the chest contraindicate REBOA. The FAST ultrasound surpasses chest X-ray as emergency imaging modality in penetrating trauma, as it is more sensitive to both cardiac tamponade and haemothorax. Conversely, the pre-REBOA chest X-ray may reveal a suspected blunt aortic injury (in the form of medias­tinal widening) in blunt trauma, which quite naturally is a strong contraindication for aortic occlusion and REBOA.
There must be a planned emergency bleeding control intervention and fast access to it if REBOA is to be used. No REBOA should be done if there is no immediate access to a surgical intervention, neither should REBOA delay the ini­tiation of the surgical procedure. Thus, the absence of standby readiness for REBOA procedure (alongside with appropriate devices and expertise) or the lack of capability to immediate life-saving surgery is considered a contraindica­tion for REBOA.
Summary of contraindications for REBOA in penetrating trauma:
• Penetrating thoracic injury with suspicion of major intra-
thoracic bleeding or cardiac injury
• Penetrating neck injury
• Suspected aortic injury
• No capability for immediate surgical intervention (espe-
cially contraindicating aortic zone 1 balloon
deployment)
• No standby readiness and expertise for REBOA use
23.6 How toReduce Complications
ofREBOA
REBOA is an invasive procedure that carries a signicant risk of complications and residual morbidity. Considering the extreme nature of the REBOA procedure, the risk of complications cannot be completely mitigated. Knowing the and early recognition of complications minimize potential hazards. REBOA-related complications can be divided into three practical categories—technical, physiological and stra­tegical (Table23.2).
23.6.1 Technical Complications
The most common technical pitfalls are access site injury, proximal arterial injury, device-related pitfalls and balloon migration. These complications can be mitigated by proper training and familiarizing oneself with the device, yet the successful operation of the REBOA mandates some experi-
Table 23.2 Table of REBOA-related complications
Technical Physiological Strategical Arterial injury Increased
cardiac post-load
Aortic injury Abdominal
ischaemia Faulty positioning Renal failure Balloon left alone Migration Spinal cord
injury Balloon rupture Arterial
thrombosis
Balloon jammed in sheath upon catheter removal
Leg ischaemia Wasting time or
Reperfusion
injury
Unprepared team
Under- or overuse of REBOA
Too long occlusion
Too fast and non-coordinated deation
ailing
ence in endovascular techniques alongside with general understanding of vascular anatomy.
Already diseased vessels (calcication, aneurysm forma­tion or elongation) carry more risk of technical failure of either the vessel or the device. Especially the blind deploy­ment of the balloon becomes increasingly hazardous in patients with pre-existing peripheral arterial disease. In case of existing vasculopathy, ultrasound-guided puncture and uoroscopy-guided procedure should be preferred. In such cases, the arterial access establishment is safer to start with micropuncture technique followed by larger sheath upsizing. Long supporting sheaths (>20cm) should be avoided in such patients due to the risk of dissection in kinked iliac arteries. Selected patients with underlying iliac artery atherosclerosis might also benet from antegrade catheter deployment via the brachial artery, but it mandates uoroscopy guidance and certain level of expertise. Due to the above-discussed issues, elderly people (>65years old) are not appropriate candidates for blind REBOA procedure.
Balloon migration is bound to happen in all zone 1 occlu­sions due to the hammering effect of aortic ow, if the cath­eter is not properly secured in place. Ideally, the person allocated for the balloon prevents this from happening whilst keeping time and upholding the situational awareness for the whole operating team.
Total aortic occlusion in zone 1 usually results in an ele­vation of systemic BP by 50–60mmHg. If no increase is noted, then one of the following should be suspected:
• Venous catheterization; accidental venous puncture
instead of arterial resulting in balloon ination some-
where in the central venous system.
• Iatrogenic arterial injury; the arterial wall is perforated or
ruptured at a zone of inating balloon causing major
bleeding.
200
https://t.me/medicina_free
• Major arterial injury above the balloon or cardiac injury; the increase in blood pressure results in increased bleed­ing above the occlusion site.
• Balloon rupture; no occlusion gained.
• Balloon is accidentally deployed in non-targeted location; non-targeted blind accidental catheterization of the con­tralateral iliac or femoral artery
Most of the complications can be prevented by using an
appropriate technique with care and common sense. Aortic perforation or rupture and balloon rupture during ination are also possible complications that may be recognized by a sudden drop of blood pressure. Whilst the latter is easily seen by appearance of blood in the inating channel of the REBOA catheter, the former is usually fatal. Ination of the balloon with care until resistance is felt is the main recom­mendation to prevent it. X-ray control of potential balloon position is typically required at least once to conrm that desired aortic location has been reached.
23.6.2 Physiological Complications
Physiological complications are related to the compromising physiological effects described in the earlier paragraphs. Signicant central pressure increase, heart strain and reper­fusion problems can be minimized with clear communica­tion and solid teamwork with the anaesthesia team. Still, most of the patients who might benet from REBOA are already bled out and pre-ischaemic, which increases adverse events related to reperfusion and abdominal ischaemia. Tactics as partial and intermittent REBOA should be deployed with full attention to ventilation and perfusion sta­tus of the patients whilst deating the balloon.
Abdominal ischaemia, renal failure and abdominal com-
partment syndrome should be routinely monitored in the ICU for all REBOA patients. Balloon time should be kept to minimum to dissipate these events, and successful operation should be followed by vigilant intensive care. A keen eye should be kept on both thromboembolic events and reperfu­sion. Trans-bladder monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure is routinely used to screen for intra-abdominal hypertension or compartment syndrome. Lower extremities can be moni­tored with pulse oximetry, and when in doubt, the threshold for angiography, access site exploration or fasciotomy should be kept low (Fig.23.7).
23.6.3 Strategical Complications
Both overuse and underuse of REBOA reect negatively to the overall results. The decision for an arterial entry is a
L. Handolin et al.
Fig. 23.7 Pulse oximeter provides a one technically simple way of monitoring the lower leg perfusion after groin puncture
judgement call and the possible need should be recognized early on. Early arterial access can be easily achieved and eas­ily removed (if not required), but also simplies REBOA placement when the patient is deteriorating during rst min­utes after arrival—the very scenario where the “crush” vas­cular access has higher chances of failure. Furthermore, clear protocol for establishing the arterial access is warranted, alongside with strict time cap for each attempt and immedi­ately available back-up plan.
It is recommended that zone 1 REBOA should only be per­formed if the anticipated time to surgery is less than 15min. Prolonged total zone 1 REBOA for interhospital transporta­tion or any other reason carries signicant risks of complica­tions and death. The decision to perform REBOA must contain the preparations for the emergency surgery in terms of mini­mizing the balloon ination time. The total balloon occlusion time must be minimized and decision to shift from total occlu­sion to partial or intermittent occlusion must be made as soon as patient’s physiology allows. Deploying the balloon and then forgetting it will result in major strategical failure.
The possibility of REBOA deployment does not necessar­ily mean that the patient will benet from it. Overuse of REBOA will result in unnecessary complications and mor­bidity. Trauma surgeon must understand the technical, physi­ological and strategic aspects of the procedure to be able to minimize the complications and address one when needed. Following a clear REBOA protocol including indications and contraindications will help in nding the correct patients. The complexity and urgent nature of the procedure call for training for the whole team involved. Seemingly straightfor­ward technical procedure is bound to fail if the device is unfamiliar and the teamwork aspect gets overlooked. As in all critical actions, the team does not rise on the occasion but sinks to the level of training.