Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 318 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
58 Мб
Скачать
15 Sepsis andSeptic Shock
https://t.me/medicina_free
137
• Septic shock is a specic subset of sepsis in which pro­found circulatory, cellular and metabolic abnormalities are associated with a greater risk of mortality than sepsis alone.
• Patients with penetrating trauma are at high risk for devel­oping sepsis and its associated complications.
• Prompt identication and appropriate management are vital to improve outcomes.
• Early appropriate antimicrobial therapy, restoration of adequate cellular perfusion and timely source control are the essential pillars in the management of patients with sepsis and septic shock.
• Inability to achieve adequate source control despite rapid resuscitation and initiation of appropriate antimicrobials may result in failure to obtain clinical stability or sus­tained patient improvement.
• Multiple organ systems may be affected by sepsis and septic shock and a multifaceted approach to the manage­ment including appropriate supportive measures and rel­evant post-sepsis care are integral components of the complete care required in such patients.
Suggested Reading
Al Rawahi AN, Al Hinai FA, Doig CJ, et al. The prognostic value of
serum procalcitonin measurements in critically injured patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2019;23:390.
Azuhata T, Kinoshita K, Kawano D, et al. Time from admission to
initiation of surgery for source control is a critical determinant of survival in patients with gastrointestinal perforation with associated septic shock. Crit Care. 2014;18:R87.
Bednarczyk JM, Fridnnson JA, Kumar A, etal. Incorporating dynamic
assessment of uid responsiveness into goal-directed therapy: a sys­tematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:1538–45.
Berenholtz SM, Pham JC, Thompson DA, etal. Collaborative cohort
study of an intervention to reduce ventilator-associated pneu­monia in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32:305–14.
Blot K, Bergs J, Voelaers D, etal. Prevention of central line- associated
bloodstream infections through quality improvement interven­tions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:96–105.
Boyer A, Vargas F, Coste F, etal. Inuence of surgical treatment
timing on mortality from necrotizing soft tissue infections requiring intensive care management. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:847–53.
Brunauer A, Koköfer A, Bataar O, etal. Changes in peripheral perfu-
sion relate to visceral organ perfusion in early septic shock: a pilot study. J Crit Care. 2016;35:105–9.
Buck DL, Vester-Andersen M, Moller MH. Surgical delay is a criti-
cal determinant of survival in perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1045–9.
Casciani F, Trudeau MT, Vollmer CM. Perioperative immunization
for splenectomy and the Surgeon’s responsibility: a review. JAMA Surg. 2020;155:1068–77.
Cecconi M, Hernandez G, Dünser M, et al. Fluid administration for
acute circulatory dysfunction using basic monitoring: narrative
review and expert panel recommendations from an ESICM task force. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:21–32.
Cowley NJ, Owen A, Shiels SC.Safety and efcacy of antiviral therapy
for prevention of cytomegalovirus reactivation in immunocompe­tent critically ill patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:774–83.
Dünser M, Mer M, Petros S, Dankl D.Clinical examination skills in
the adult critically ill patient. NewYork City: Springer International Publishing; 2018.
Dünser MW, Takala J, Brunauer A, et al. Re-thinking resuscitation:
leaving blood pressure cosmetics behind and moving forward to permissive hypotension and a tissue perfusion-based approach. Crit Care. 2013;17:326.
Eriksson J, Lindström AC, Hellgren E, etal. Postinjury sepsis—asso-
ciations with risk factors, impact on clinical course, and mortality: a retrospective observational study. Crit Care Explor. 2021;3:e0495.
Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign:
international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock
2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47:1181–247.
Font MD, Thyagarajan B, Khanna AK.Sepsis and septic shock—basics
of diagnosis, pathophysiology and clinical decision making. Med Clin North Am. 2020;104:573–85.
Fullen WD, Hunt J, Altemeier WA.Prophylactic antibiotics in penetrat-
ing wounds of the abdomen. J Trauma. 1972;12:282–9.
Goldberg SR, Anand RJ, Como JJ, etal. Prophylactic antibiotic use
in penetrating abdominal trauma: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(Suppl 4):S321–5.
Golger A, Ching S, Goldsmith CH, etal. Mortality in patients with nec-
rotizing fasciitis. Plast Reconst Surg. 2007;119(6):1803–7.
Heffernan AJ, Mohd Sazlly Lim S, Lipman J, et al. A personalised
approach to antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in critically ill patients. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021;40:100970.
Hernández G, Teboul JL. Is the macrocirculation really dissociated
from the microcirculation in septic shock? Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1621–4.
Johnson MT, Reichley R, Hoppe-Bauer J, etal. Impact of previous anti-
biotic therapy on outcome of Gram-negative sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(8):1859–65.
Knox DB, Lanspa MJ, Kuttler KG, etal. Phenotypic clusters within
sepsis-associated multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:814–22.
Komori A, Iriyama H, Kainoh T, etal. The impact of infection compli-
cations after trauma differs according to trauma severity. Sci Rep. 2021;11:13803.
Kronen R, Liang SY, Bochiccio G, etal. Invasive fungal infections sec-
ondary to traumatic injury. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;62:102–11.
Kumar A, Ellis P, Arabi Y, etal. Initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial
therapy results in a vefold reduction of survival in human septic shock. Chest. 2009;136(5):1237–48.
Lamoth F.Galactomannan and 1,3-β--glucan testing for the diagnosis
of invasive aspergillosis. J Fungi. 2016;2:22.
Liu TM, Chi CY, Ho MW, etal. Microbiology and factors affecting
mortality in necrotizing fasciitis. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2005;38(6):430–5.
Liu VX, Fielding-Singh V, Greene JD, etal. The timing of early antibi-
otics and hospital mortality in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:856–63.
Ma XY, Tian LX, Liang HP.Early prevention of trauma-related infec-
tion/sepsis. Mil Med Res. 2016;3:33.
Manrique-Caballero CL, Del Rio-Pertuz G, Gomez H. Sepsis-
associated acute kidney injury. Crit Care Clin. 2021;37:279–301.
Martinez ML, Ferrer R, Torrents E, et al. Impact of source control
in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:11–9.
138
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Mer and M. W. Dünser
Martin-Loeches I, Antonelli M, Cuenca-Estrella M, et al. ESICM/
ESCMID task force on practical management of invasive candidia­sis in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:789–805.
Mer M, Lipman J. Antibiotic administration in the critically ill—in
need of intensive care! S Afr Med J. 2015;105(5):357–9.
Mer M, Schultz MJ, Adhikari NK.European Society of Intensive Care
Medicine (ESICM) Global Intensive Care Working Group and the Mahidol-Oxford research Unit (MORU), Bangkok, Thailand. Core elements of general supportive care for patients with sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(11):1690–4.
Miyamoto K, Shibata N, Ogawa A, et al. Prehospital and in-hospital
quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scores to predict in-hospital mortality among trauma patients: an analysis of nation­wide registry data. Acute Med Surg. 2020;7:e532.
Montravers P, Gauzit R, Muller C, et al. Emergence of antibiotic-
resistant bacteria in cases of peritonitis after intraabdominal surgery affects the efcacy of empirical antimicrobial therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23(3):486–94.
Montravers P, Tubach F, Lescot T, etal. Short-course antibiotic therapy
for critically ill patients treated for postoperative intra-abdominal infection: the DURAPOP randomised clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(3):300–10.
Müller F, Christ-Crain M, Bregenzer T, etal. Procalcitonin levels pre-
dict bacteremia in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective cohort trial. Chest. 2010;138:121–9.
Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or
saline for uid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1901–11.
Osborn TM, Tracy JK, Dunne JR, et al. Epidemiology of sepsis in
patients with traumatic injury. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:2234–40.
Pugh R, Grant C, Cooke RPD, etal. Short-course versus prolonged-
course antibiotic therapy for hospital-acquired pneumonia in criti­cally ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015:CD007577.
Roberts JA, Abdul-Aziz MH, Davis JS, etal. Continuous versus inter-
mittent β-lactam infusion in severe sepsis. A meta-analysis of indi­vidual patient data from randomized trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:681–91.
Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, etal. Global, regional, and national
sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis of the global burden of disease study. Lancet. 2020;395:200–11.
Russel JA, Rush B, Boyd J.Pathophysiology of septic shock. Crit Care
Clin. 2018;34:43–61.
Sawyer RG, Claridge JA, Nathens AB, et al. Trial of short-course
antimicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1996–2005.
Schmittinger CA, Torgersen C, Luckner G, etal. Adverse cardiac events
during catecholamine vasopressor therapy: a prospective observa­tional study. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:950–8.
Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, etal. Time to treatment and mor-
tality during mandated emergency Care for Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2235–44.
Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, etal. Assessment of clinical cri-
teria for sepsis: for the third international consensus denitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:762–74.
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, etal. The third international
consensus denitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801–10.
Smith BJ, Heriot G, Buising K.Antibiotic treatment of common infec-
tions: more evidence to support shorter durations. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2020;33:433–40.
Thompson BT, Chambers RC, Liu KD.Acute respiratory distress syn-
drome. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:562–72.
Tokuda Y, Miyasato H, Stein GH, etal. The degree of chills for risk of
bacteremia in acute febrile illness. Am J Med. 2005;118:1417.
Vardakas KZ, Voulgaris GL, Maliaros A, etal. Prolonged versus short-
term intravenous infusion of antipseudomonal β-lactams for patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:108–20.
Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, etal. The SOFA (sepsis-related organ
failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707–10.
Wong CH, Chang HC, Pasupathy S, etal. Necrotising fasciitis: clinical
presentation, microbiology and determinants of mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(8):1454–60.
Zampieri FG, Machado FR, Biondi RS, etal. Effect of intravenous uid
treatment with a balanced solution vs. 0.9% saline solution on mor­tality in critically ill patients: the BaSICS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;326:1–12.
Zuercher P, Moret CS, Dziewas R, etal. Dysphagia in the intensive care
unit: epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical management. Crit Care. 2019;23:103.
Endpoints ofResuscitation
×××
()
https://t.me/medicina_free
DavidMuckart
“Resuscitare” [Latin transitive verb] “to bring back to life”
If the aim of resuscitation is to restore life, as the above
denition implies, the underlying pathophysiology which threatens existence must be understood. Whatever the mech­anism of shock, the nal common denominators are tissue ischaemia and anaerobic metabolism. The reason why this pathophysiological state is lethal can be explained by basic physiology. The human is an aerobic organism and 90% of consumed oxygen is used to produce adenosine triphosphate (ATP) via Kreb’s cycle. Manufactured by mitochondria within the cell, ATP is virtually the sole energy source for the myriad of energy requiring enzymatic reactions to maintain homeostasis. The human consists of four quadrillion cells, in each of which there are thousands of mitochondria. On aver­age, only 100g of ATP exists at any one time and cells turn over 107 molecules of ATP per second, with each molecule being recycled every 20–30s. This results in an average daily production of 100–150 kg of ATP per day. The molecular weight of ATP, which therefore contains Avogadro’s number or 6×1023 molecules, is 0.5kg, and therefore the daily mini­mum production is at least two hundred times this number, namely, 12× 1025 molecules. How big is this number? It amounts to the number of cupsful of water in 200 Pacic Oceans. Little wonder then that shock, which disrupts oxy­gen delivery or utilisation at the cellular level, is a threat to life. Even for only a short period, shock results in marked depletion of ATP, and protracted episodes result in a pro­found physiological abyss from which there is no prospect of recovery. Therefore, the ultimate goal of resuscitation is to restore anaerobic metabolism as swiftly as possible.
In the absence of traumatic brain injury which accounts
for the majority of trauma deaths, there are three indepen­dent predictors of death in trauma, namely, hypoxia, hypo-
16
perfusion and hypothermia, a combination termed the “triple H syndrome”. The presence of the lethal triad of acidosis, coagulopathy and hypothermia is a late consequence of shock, and the thrust of resuscitation must be to correct the “triple H syndrome”. Hypoxia may be absolute when there is a low PaO2, or relative which is reected by a lactic acidosis indicating anaerobic metabolism and cellular hypoxia. Hypoperfusion is manifest by hypotension but may be pres­ent even in the face of a normal mean arterial blood pressure if vasopressors have been commenced. Hypothermia exists if the core temperature is below 35°C.
Given the above physiological review and the independent risk factors for death, the thrust of resuscitation must be to restore oxygen delivery (DO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2) and monitor the effect of interventions and reversal of the met­abolic acidosis. The equation for DO2 is the product of cardiac output and arterial oxygen content which translates into:
DO heart rate stroke volumeHbSaO
2 2
0 0031
where SaO2=arterial oxygen saturation and PaO2=arterial partial pressure of oxygen
Given the above equation and the need to reverse anaero­bic metabolism, the two common areas of monitoring to determine the endpoints of resuscitation involve the macro­circulation using haemodynamics and the microcirculation assessing markers of tissue perfusion.
()
PaO
.
2
16.1 Haemodynamic Monitoring
16.1.1 Pulse Rate
134
.
D. Muckart (*) Trauma and Trauma Intensive Care Units, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Nelson R.Mandela School of Clinical Medicine, Durban, KZN, South Africa
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 E. Degiannis et al. (eds.), Penetrating Trauma, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47006-6_16
From ancient time, the character of the pulse has guided phy­sicians. One of the early denitions of shock was a systolic pressure < 100 mmHg and a pulse rate of >100beats per minute. The endpoint of resuscitation was to reverse these
139
140
https://t.me/medicina_free
D. Muckar t
numbers. A reduction in pulse rate is uncommon for a num­ber of reasons. Firstly, shock results in an altered level of consciousness and failure to appreciate a noxious stimulus. Restoration of cerebral perfusion results in pain and anxiety with a resultant tachycardia. Secondly, the normal barore­ceptor response is tonic and during shock baroreceptor impulses decrease resulting in a rise in pulse rate. Despite restoration of an adequate intravascular volume, the barore­ceptor response lags behind and a tachycardia persists. Thirdly, the systemic inammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is dened by a tachycardia and is an almost constant feature of trauma. For these reasons, relying on a fall in pulse rate to signify an endpoint of resuscitation is not recommended.
16.1.2 Arterial Saturation (SaO2)
A minimum SaO2 of 95% must be achieved during the initial resuscitation, above this level there being minimal improve­ment in DO2. Anaerobic metabolism creates air hunger and tachypnoea as a compensatory mechanism with the aim of removing CO2 to eliminate acid. Even if SaO2 can be main­tained by spontaneous ventilation, the work of breathing is markedly increased resulting in an increase in oxygen con­sumption. In the presence of a moderate to severe metabolic acidosis, this compensation should default to the clinician, and patients with hypotension must be intubated and mechanically ventilated, thereby eliminating unnecessary wastage of DO2. Protective lung ventilation has been pro­posed as standard of care in the critically ill, but it is crucial to understand that all data from these studies have been extracted from critically ill patients in ICU with established severe lung dysfunction. These results have no relevance whatsoever to the emergency room and acute resuscitation, and the use of low tidal volumes will not allow the effective removal of CO2 nor will it recruit atelectatic lung segments, a not uncommon problem in thoracic trauma as a result of pulmonary contusions. Assuming similar effects, the mis­guided extrapolation of results from one phase of critical care to a markedly different scenario and location is unjusti­able and dangerous. The endpoint of ventilatory resuscita­tion is a SaO2 of >95% and a CO2 which allows the arterial pH to remain above 7.2 until intravascular volume expansion has been achieved and the metabolic acidosis improving. The most effective method of reducing arterial PaCO2 is by increasing the tidal volume and not the respiratory rate. The benet of using larger tidal volumes during acute resuscita­tion far outweighs the potential long-term risk of ventilator­induced lung injury. End-tidal CO2 closely reects arterial PaCO2 and is the most practical method of monitoring and obviates the need for frequent arterial blood gas sampling.
16.2 Mixed andCentral Venous Oxygen
Saturation
Mixed venous saturation (SvO2) is measured in blood sam­pled from the pulmonary artery and therefore requires the insertion of a pulmonary artery catheter. Central venous saturation (ScvO2) is obtained from a central venous cath­eter and is an acceptable substitute. The normal oxygen extraction ratio (arterial saturation venous saturation) is 25% and ScvO2 is therefore around 75%. Due to mixing of venous blood from the coronary sinus which drains directly into the right atrium, SvO2 is usually 5% lower than ScvO2, although this difference may be reversed in septic shock. In the presence of shock and a low ScvO2, the assumption is that DO2 is inadequate with excessive oxygen extraction at the cellular level. The aim therefore is to achieve a ScvO2 of >70%. Although theoretically sound, there are caveats. A high ScvO2 may be present but the acidosis fails to improve and may even worsen. This suggests an unsal­vageable situation where cellular hypoxia has resulted in mitochondrial dysfunction and the inability to extract and utilise delivered oxygen. There is no current evidence to substantiate the application of ScvO2 in trauma resuscitation.
16.3 Pressure andFlow
DO2 depends on adequate blood ow to the tissues but despite attempts to quantify cardiac output, this has been elu­sive (vide infra). As a result, we use pressure as a surrogate but this has certain pitfalls. The law of haemodynamics dic­tates that pressure is a product of ow and peripheral vascu­lar resistance; there is no mention of volume.
16.4 Central Venous Pressure (CVP)
CVP has been used to reect right heart preload, dened as the degree of ventricular stretch at end diastole. In the spon­taneously breathing patient, this may have some merit but in those undergoing mechanical ventilation, this is erroneous. It is assumed that a high CVP indicates loss of vascular com­pliance and therefore an adequate intravascular volume. There are many other compliance issues which impact on CVP however, namely, pulmonary pressure during mechani­cal ventilation, right heart volume, chest wall anatomy and intra-abdominal pressure. As such, in the critically injured patient undergoing positive pressure ventilation, CVP is an unreliable indicator of right heart preload and intravascular volume and cannot be used as an indicator of uid responsiveness.
16 Endpoints ofResuscitation
https://t.me/medicina_free
141
16.5 IVC Diameter
Although CVP has been shown to be unreliable, ultrasonic measurement of IVC diameter may reect intravascular vol­ume. In haemodynamically normal patients breathing spon­taneously, when assessed by abdominal ultrasound, the IVC diameter decreases by 50% during inspiration due to the negative intrathoracic pressure allowing improved venous return. The opposite occurs during positive pressure ventila­tion where increased intrathoracic pressure during inspira­tion reduces venous return and the IVC expands although the volume change is much lower. Measurement is made during mandatory inspiration using a tidal volume of 8mL/kg or less. A change in IVC diameter of >15% from baseline expi­ration indicates increased compliance due to hypovolaemia.
16.6 Pulmonary Arterial Pressure
For many years, the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) was regarded as the gold standard for haemodynamic monitoring with the assumption that a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) reects left ventricular volume. Swan and Ganz, however, stated categorically that this held true only in patients with no lung pathology. For some reason, this state­ment was ignored and the PAC became routine practice. It is nonsensical to believe that if right atrial pressure measured by a central venous catheter placed directly adjacent to that chamber is inaccurate but that a catheter measuring a pres­sure across a diseased organ (the lung), another chamber (the left atrium) and a valve (the mitral valve) is correct. The pul­monary artery occlusion pressure does not reect intravascu­lar volume or uid responsiveness and there is no role for the PAC in acute trauma resuscitation.
16.7 Peripheral Arterial Pressure
patients with a reduced intravascular volume may occlude forward ow to the left side of the heart. The combined effects are reduction of systolic blood pressure during inspi­ration and a fall in systolic pressure of >15mmHg during inspiration which is a strong indicator of a suboptimal intra­vascular volume despite what would appear to be an ade­quate mean arterial pressure. If measuring systolic pressure variation, certain criteria must be fullled, namely, that the patient must be mechanically ventilated and take no sponta­neous breaths. The patient must be pre-oxygenated and briey hyperventilated to reduce the PaCO2 and therefore eliminate triggered spontaneous breaths. Thereafter, the ven­tilator is placed on expiratory hold and the systolic pressure determined during apnoea. This manoeuvre eliminates the effect of inspiration while maintaining PEEP, and in virtually all patients, the variation in systolic pressure will disappear. Mechanical ventilation is then recommenced and the effect on systolic blood pressure ascertained. A fall in systolic blood pressure during inspiration indicates hypovolaemia, whereas a rise suggests the need for inotropic support.
16.8 Cardiac Output Monitoring
With the decline of the PAC, less invasive methods of cardiac output (CO) monitoring have evolved using a variety of tech­niques. Despite concerns about the accuracy of the PAC, this is used as the comparator for these monitors. No method of non-invasive CO monitoring has less than a 20% error rate or greater than 90% concordance with the PAC, and the percent­age error rises with the use of vasopressors, the very patients in whom an accurate estimation of CO is desired. There are few data demonstrating a survival advantage using these monitors. CO monitoring simply generates a number and does not indicate whether this meets tissue oxygen demands. It should never be used in isolation but if CO is determined, it must be combined with markers of peripheral perfusion.
Although more accurate than CVP as an indicator of intra­vascular volume, a normal mean arterial pressure may not signify a successful endpoint of resuscitation. Peripheral vasoconstriction may maintain arterial pressure despite hypoperfusion. This is especially true in children who have the ability to maintain their blood pressure by profound vasoconstriction and their cardiac output by a signicant tachycardia until sudden decompensation occurs.
A simple but reliable indicator of arterial volume is the use of systolic or pulse pressure variation using invasive arte­rial monitoring. During the inspiratory phase of mechanical ventilation, venous return is reduced by increased intratho­racic pressure resulting in a reduction in right ventricular preload and therefore stroke volume. As the lungs expand, alveolar expansion compresses pulmonary capillaries and in
16.9 Haemoglobin andCoagulation
More than two millennia ago, the Hindu doctrines of Sushruta Samhita (circa 700BCE) dictated that the best treatment of any lost substance is replacement by an identical expander. For some inexplicable reason, it has taken us two and a half thousand years to adopt his philosophy. Although stroke vol­ume may be restored using either crystalloids or colloids, these solutions do not carry oxygen, and in the presence of severe haemorrhage, their use should be limited. The only effective mechanism for oxygen transport is haemoglobin, and a massive transfusion protocol which allows the rapid admin­istration of blood must be in place in any health facility which treats major trauma. The endpoint of PRBC transfusion is a
142
https://t.me/medicina_free
D. Muckar t
haemoglobin concentration of 10 g/dL. Based on rheology, this is the optimal concentration for oxygen delivery. The ini­tial haemoglobin concentration is articially high and mis­leading and should be repeated frequently during resuscitation. On average, in the absence of major ongoing haemorrhage, one unit of PRBC will raise the haemoglobin by 1g.
In addition to PRBCs, the acute coagulopathy of trauma and shock (ACoTS) necessitates the administration of plasma, platelets and possibly cryoprecipitate. Although this must not be viewed as absolute, current evidence suggests that the optimal ratio of packed red blood cells (PRBC) to plasma and platelets is 1:1:1. A word of caution is in order when blindly adopting such a policy. Firstly, PRBC and component therapy are not cheap and over-zealous use attracts both economic and physiological adverse conse­quences. Secondly, patients are unique individuals and the need for ratios of unity is dependent on the physical and physiological scenario. Although overlap is obvious, patients may be broadly grouped into four categories as depicted below, and this should dictate how aggressively blood and component therapy is employed (Fig.16.1).
The broad divisions are the degree of physiological derangement and whether source control is absolute. Patients in whom total source control of haemorrhage can be achieved, such as splenectomy, and who are not severely physiologi­cally deranged may not require additional component ther­apy or the full ratios. In contrast, those with incomplete source control such as liver or pelvic packing who are hypo­thermic and acidotic would undoubtedly benet. The opti­mal method of ascertaining the need for component therapy is thromboelastometry. The standard laboratory tests for coagulation are not representative of the trauma patient, are performed at 37° centigrade, take 20–30 min, assess only the initial phase of clot formation and give no information
regarding the quality or strength of clot formation, platelet function or brinolysis. Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM©) has been proposed as the gold standard, reecting as close to an invivo situation as possible. We have used thromboelastometry for the last 10years and found it immensely helpful in not only identify­ing ACoTS but also dictating the need for, and the effect of, administering specic component therapy. The main compo­nents of the graphic representation of coagulation are illus­trated and described below with normal values (Fig.16.2).
• R time (reaction time from 0 to 2mm amplitude) is nor­mally between 7 and 15min and represents the clotting time until initial brin formation.
• K time (coagulation time) is normally between 3 and 6min and reects the rate of clot formation from the end of R time at 2 to 20mm clot amplitude.
α angle is normally between 45 and 55° and represents the rate of clot formation by brin build-up and cross-linking.
• MA is normally around 60mm and reects the maximum clot strength.
Factors affecting measurements in thromboelastography:
• Prolonged R time: anticoagulants and reduced clotting factor concentration
• Prolonged K time: reduced clotting factors, brinogen deciency and thrombocytopaenia
• Low α angle: reduced clotting factors, brinogen de­ciency and thrombocytopaenia
• Reduced MA: platelet dysfunction
• Fibrinolysis: acute coagulopathy of trauma and shock (ACoTS)
Fig. 16.1 Recommendations for the use of blood, platelets, plasma and cryoprecipitate depending on whether source control has been achieved and the degree of hypothermia. The ratios (eg 1 : 1) depict the number of packs of plasma or platelets per unit of blood
COMPLETE SOURCE CONTROL
Temperature > 35 BD <-5
PRBC PRBC < 6No platelets : No plasma < 6Platelets 1 : 1 + TEG 6 –8 Platelets 1 : 1 Plasma 0.5 : 16 –8 Platelets 1 : 1 Plasma 0.75 : 1 >8 Platelets 1 : 1 Plasma 1 : 1> 8Platelets 1 : 1 Plasma 1 : 1
COMPLETE SOURCE CONTROL
Temperature < 35 BD >-5
PRBC PRBC < 6Thromboelastography < 6Platelets 1 : 1 Plasma 0.5 : 1 6- 8Platelets 1 : 1 Plasma 0.75 : 16 –8 Platelets 1 : 1 Plasma 1 : 1 > 8Platelets 1 : 1 Plasma 1 : 1> 8Platelets 1 : 1 Plasma 1 : 1 + cryo
INCOMPLETE SOURCE CONTROL
Temperature > 35 BD <-5
INCOMPLETE SOURCE CONTROL
Temperature < 35 BD >-5
16 Endpoints ofResuscitation
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 16.2 Normal thromboelastogram tracing (In Raj TD (eds) Data Interpretation in Anesthesia pp.160–66. Springer. Charm.
https://doi. org/10.1007/978- 3- 319­55862- 2_30)
143
α
R
K
MA
30 min
A
30 (LY 30)
16.10 Reversal ofAnaerobic Metabolism
16.10.1 Lactate
During normal aerobic metabolism of glucose, lactate is pro­duced from pyruvate by lactate dehydrogenase and the nor­mal pyruvate/lactate ratio is 1:10. During anaerobic metabolism, pyruvate cannot enter Kreb’s cycle and lactate levels increase, and this serves as a marker of anaerobic metabolism and oxygen debt. The normal lactate concentra­tion is <2.5mmol/L, and there is no substantial difference between arterial and central venous lactate concentrations, therefore allowing either to sufce for monitoring. Although liver and renal dysfunction may result in delayed metabolism of lactate, this is uncommon, and serial estimations of lactate indicate the success or otherwise of resuscitation. The initial lactate concentrations do not necessarily correlate with out­come, and the time to lactate clearance is a more accurate and independent predictor of survival. Complete elimination within 24h is associated with high survival rates, whereas failure to normalise lactate after 48 h increases mortality substantially. A distinction must be made between oxygen decit and oxygen debt. Normal haemodynamic parameters are an indication that there is no decit in DO2 and by extrap­olation VO2, but the presence of a persistently elevated lac­tate suggests that an oxygen debt remains and is a marker of occult tissue hypoxia. This oxygen debt has to be repaid before physiology is normalised and is a useful indicator to decide when elective fracture xation is safe. Despite similar fracture xation techniques and operative times, patients in whom surgery is undertaken when the lactate is within nor­mal limits fare better postoperatively compared to their abnormal counterparts.
common complications as a result of a shock episode and worsen outcome. Base decit is unaffected by acute respira­tory conditions, is a pure metabolic marker for both aerobic and anaerobic pathologies and as such more accurately reects the global metabolic dysfunction and the severity of the underlying physiological disruption. Base decit corre­lates with injury severity, the need for urgent blood transfu­sion and outcome. As with lactate, rapid clearance indicates successful resuscitation and a protracted base decit a poor prognosis.
16.11 Supranormal Resuscitation
andPermissive Hypotension
16.11.1 Supranormal Resuscitation
If a subnormal DO2 is the underlying pathophysiology in shock, then in theory, rapid correction of this state and driv­ing haemodynamics to supranormal levels should improve survival. The initial chosen endpoints were a DO2 of >600mL/m2 and VO2 of >170mL/m2 using a combination of intravenous uids, inotropes and vasopressors. Unfortunately, this theory has been disproven and deliberate attempts to achieve predetermined goals of DO2 and VO2 do not reduce mortality. Survival is determined by the individual’s physio­logical reserve and the capability of spontaneous restoration of adequate perfusion. It is independent of the endpoints of resuscitation or method of monitoring. Patients who achieve the predetermine goals have a far better prognosis but attempting to drive patients to these endpoints is of no benet.
16.10.2 Base Decit
Lactate is a measure only of anaerobic metabolism and does not assess metabolic acidoses from aerobic causes such as acute kidney injury or hyperchloraemia, both of which are
16.11.2 Permissive Hypotension
There is a concern that rapid restoration of blood pressure may destroy tenuous early clot formation and precipitate fur­ther haemorrhage or aggravate blood loss and coagulopathy in patients who have not achieved spontaneous haemostasis.
144
https://t.me/medicina_free
D. Muckar t
In patients who are transient or non-responders to resuscita­tion, surgery must be undertaken as part of the resuscitation process. Mean arterial pressure should be maintained at 50–60mmHg until surgical control of haemorrhage has been obtained. Hypoperfusion of this magnitude may be tolerated for 60 min, but beyond that physiological reserve will be exhausted, multiple organ dysfunction is the rule and mortal­ity is extremely high.
16.12 Conclusion
There is no one monitoring tool which guarantees the end­point of resuscitation. Although intuitive, the normalisation of haemodynamic parameters does not necessarily signify success, and these must be combined with tissue perfusion techniques to allow a global assessment of perfusion and sat­isfactory restoration of aerobic metabolism.
Important Points
• Anaerobic metabolism is lethal and must be rapidly reversed.
• Hypoxia, hypoperfusion and hypothermia are indepen­dent predictors of death.
• No single haemodynamic monitoring tool is reliable as an endpoint.
• Lactate clearance is proportional to survival.
• A massive transfusion protocol improves outcome.
• Ratios of blood/plasma/platelets are dictated by ease of source control and physiology.
• Thromboelastometry is essential to determine the need for component therapy.
Suggested Reading
Abu-Zidan FM.Optimizing the value of measuring inferior vena caval
diameter in shocked patients. World J Crit Care. 2016;5:7–11.
Barbee RW, Reynolds PS, Ward KR. Assessing shock resuscitation
strategies by oxygen debt repayment. Shock. 2010;33:113–22.
Brohi K, Cohen MJ, Ganter MT, etal. Acute coagulopathy of trauma:
hypoperfusion induces systemic anticoagulation and hyperbri­nolysis. J Trauma. 2008;64:1211–7.
Cestero RF, Dent DL.Endpoints of resuscitation. Surg Clin North Am.
2015;95:319–36.
Grey BC, Rodseth R, Muckart DJJ.Early fracture xation in the pres-
ence of subclinical hypoperfusion. Injury. 2013;44:217–20.
Hardcastle TC, Muckart DJJ, Maier RV. Ventilation in the trauma
patients: the rst 24h is different. World J Surg. 2017;41:1153–8.
Johannson PI, Stissing P, Boschen L, etal. Thromboelastography and
thromboelastomotry in assessing coagulation in trauma. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009;17:45–53.
Maddirala S, Khan A. Optimizing haemodynamic support in septic
shock using central and mixed venous oxygen saturation. Crit Care Clin. 2010;26:323–33.
Marik PE. Non-invasive cardiac output monitors: a state of the art
review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anaesth. 2013;1:121–34.
Marik PE, Lemson J.Fluid responsiveness: an evolution of our under-
standing. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:617–20.
Michard F, Teboul JL.Predicting uid responsiveness in ICU patients:
a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000–8.
Monnet X, Teboul J-L. Assessment of volume responsiveness during
mechanical ventilation: recent advances. Crit Care. 2013;17:217. http:// ccforum. com/ content/ 17/ 2/ 217
Muckart DJJ, Bhagwanjee S, Gous E.Validation of an outcome predic-
tion model for critically ill trauma patients without head injury. J Trauma. 1997;43:934–8.
Muckart DJJ, Malbrain MLNG. A whiter shade of pale. The ongo-
ing challenge of haemorrhagic shock. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2018;50:1–6.
Mutschler M, Nienaber U, Brockamp T, et al. Renaissance of base
decit for the initial assessment of trauma patients: a base decit­based classication for hypovolaemic shock developed on data from 16,305 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU®. Crit Care. 2013;17:R42. http://ccforum.com/content/17/2/R42
Odom SR, Howell MD, Silva GS, etal. Lactate clearance as a pre-
dictor of mortality in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74:999–1004.
Okorie ON, Dellinger P.Lactate: biomarker and potential therapeutic
target. Crit Care Clin. 2011;27:299–326.
Paxian M, Bauer I, Rensing H, etal. Recovery of hepatocellular ATP
and “pericentral apoptosis” after haemorrhage and resuscitation. FASEB J. 2003;17:993–1002.
Reminiac F, Saint-Etienne C, Runge I, etal. Are central venous lactate
and arterial lactate interchangeable? A human retrospective study. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:605–10.
Riskin DJ, Tsai TC, Riskin L, etal. Massive transfusion protocols: the
role of aggressive resuscitation versus product ratio in mortality reduction. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:198–205.
Rixen D, Siegel JH.Bench-to-bedside review: oxygen debt and its met-
abolic correlates as quantiers of the severity of haemorrhagic and post-traumatic shock. Crit Care. 2005;9:441–53.
Tisherman SA, Barie P, Bokhari F, etal. Clinical practice guideline:
endpoints of resuscitation. J Trauma. 2004;57:898–912.
Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Shoemaker WC, et al. Endpoints of
resuscitation of critically injured patients: normal or supranormal? Ann Surg. 2000;232:409–18.
Plain X-Rays forPenetrating Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
SimengWang, DonaldJ.Green, MarkBernstein, andMarkoBukur
17
17.1 Plain X-Rays forPenetrating Trauma
Plain X-rays have long been used in assessing traumatic inju­ries and comprise an integral part of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) approach to the care of traumatic patients. Meanwhile, rapid, multi-detector computed tomog­raphy (CT) has become readily available and steps away from the resuscitation bay. The routine use of CT has been adopted as protocol in many centers, including our own. Though there is no question that advanced imaging provides superior resolu­tion and diagnostic capability, there is still great utility in using plain X-rays for rapid assessment of penetrating injuries.
17.2 Rationale forthe“Plain Film”
There are a multitude of reasons that a trauma surgeon should become procient in interpreting plain X-rays. Advanced imaging studies may be subject to resource availability and technical failures, especially in non-US civilian centers. Additionally, patients with penetrating injury in critical condi­tion may not be suitable for leaving the resuscitation bay that can lead to the infamous “death in CT scan”; thus plain lms in conjunction with bedside ultrasound may be the only feasi­ble studies in certain circumstances. Furthermore, screening of asymptomatic patients with diagnostic X-rays has been shown to decrease time spent in the emergency department,
provide substantial cost savings, and avoid unnecessary radia­tion exposure to those who do not require further workup.
17.3 Limitations of“Plain Film” Imaging
There are several limitations intrinsic to using conventional X-rays in assessing penetrating trauma. Portable, single- view plain lms are readily acquired and often immediately avail­able for review in the resuscitation bay. The capability of evalu­ating anatomic structures is often limited. For example, pseudocardiomegaly, mediastinal enlargement, or increased pulmonary vascularity is often seen in the anteroposterior (AP) view chest X-ray. In abdominal images, the AP view cannot distinguish superimposed soft tissue or bony structures from underlying viscera. Additionally, without additional dimen­sions, X-rays do not always provide adequate information to delineate the relative location of the injury to anatomic struc­tures. Lastly, the sensitivity of demonstrating air-uid level, pneumothorax, or free intraperitoneal air is largely undermined by supine or semirecumbent patient positioning during resusci­tation. Despite these limitations, when analyzed appropriately by experienced clinicians, plain lms can be invaluable with respect to the information they readily provide.
17.4 Chest Radiography
S. Wang · M. Bukur (*) Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue, New York, NY, USA e-mail: simeng.wang@nyulangone.org;
marko.bukur@nyulangone.org
D. J. Green Trauma and Emergency Surgery, HonorHealth, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
M. Bernstein Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue, New York, NY, USA
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 E. Degiannis et al. (eds.), Penetrating Trauma, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47006-6_17
Thoracic injuries account for a signicant proportion of trau­matic deaths. Penetrating injuries to the thorax account for 4–15% of admissions to major civilian trauma centers. A high percentage of these patients will have injuries involving the chest wall, pleura, or lungs that are identiable on chest X-ray. The portable chest radiograph is the initial screening test for the majority of patients with penetrating thoracic trauma. It allows for detection of major life-threatening tho­racic injuries and assists in triage of these patients. We will discuss the utility of thoracic plain lms and imaging nd­ings of specic injuries in the sections that follow.
145
146
https://t.me/medicina_free
17.4.1 Soft Tissues andBony Thorax
Subcutaneous hematomas present as nonspecic radioden­sity overlying the chest wall due to blood accumulation in the soft tissues. This can result from damage to muscular structures, underlying rib fractures, or injury to vessels of the chest wall. Radiodense foreign bodies dislodged in the soft tissue such as a missile or a penetrating object can be identi­ed on plain lms.
Rib fractures are the most common injury identied on
X-rays (Fig. 17.1) and may signify associated pleural and parenchymal injuries. Once a rib fracture is found in the pen­etrating setting, it is important to vigilantly look for a possi­ble hemothorax, pneumothorax, or pulmonary contusion as a result of the penetrating objects or the sharp rib fractured edges.
Soft tissue emphysema is another commonly identied
abnormality on radiographic imaging of penetrating trauma (Figs.17.1 and 17.2). Similarly, the presence of subcutane­ous air should alert one to look for associated ipsilateral rib fractures and intrathoracic pathology. This nding should be presumed from an underlying pneumothorax, even if not readily identiable on the radiograph.
S. Wang et al.
Fig. 17.2 Subcutaneous emphysema (red arrowheads) in a patient with small left pneumothorax (white arrows) conrmed on a later CT chest
17.4.2 Pleura andLung Parenchyma
Pneumothoraces are common complications from penetrat­ing thoracic injury and occur secondary to disruption of lung parenchyma that leads to air accumulation in the intra­pleural space. The most typical radiographic nding is the “visceral- pleural line” in the apical-lateral lung eld repre-
Fig. 17.1 Image of a gunshot wound to the left chest with rst rib fracture (red asterisk) and associated subcutaneous emphysema of the neck (red arrow heads). The white arrows dene the underlying hemopneumothorax
Fig. 17.3 Subtle left anterior pneumothorax in anteromedial (red arrowheads) recess following left chest stab injury with abundant sub-
cutaneous emphysema
senting separation of the normally apposed visceral and parietal pleura. However, this nding may not be visualized in up to 30% of the cases when chest X-rays are taken in supine or semirecumbent positions, as commonly done in trauma settings. Instead, pneumothoraces may be seen in the anteromedial and subpulmonic recesses (Fig. 17.3). Other less common X-ray ndings also include a hyperlu­cent upper abdomen, sharply demarcated diaphragm, demarcation of the inferior surface of the lung, and the “deep sulcus sign” (Fig.17.4).
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025