Теоретическая грамматика английского языка = Theoretical Grammar of the English Language. Учебное пособие
.pdf:
|
|
|
|
« |
1 |
: |
» |
|
|
|
|
:
1
1.Which syntactical function cannot verbals (non-finite forms) perform?
2.Which verbal has a triple (not dual) nature?
3.What is the strong member of the opposition of the category of prospective time?
4.What is the difference between a simple and a composite sentence?
5.Which two minimal clauses does a complex sentence consist of?
6.Give one example of a semi-compound sentence.
7.What is syndetic connection? Can compound sentences be connected syndetically?
8.Define the type of the following sentence: I haven’t seen you since you left the old camp.
9.Give the name of the non-finite form in bold and state its function. She was outside on the step, gazing at the winter afternoon.
2
1.Which verbal is considered as the head word-form of the whole paradigm of the verb?
2.What is the strong member of the opposition of the category of primary time?
3.What are the cardinal communicative sentence types?
4.What is the difference between a compound and a complex sentence?
5.What is a predicative line?
6.Give one example of a semi-complex sentence.
7.What is asyndetic connection? Can complex sentences be connected asyndetically?
8.Define the type of the following sentence: They had kept him in the house without the girl’s knowledge.
111
9.Give the name of the non-finite form in bold and state its function. I don’t like the idea of you going there alone.
:
|
|
|
|
« |
1 |
: |
» |
|
|
|
|
:.
1.Who are the founders of the theory of speech acts?
2.Give the definition of the theme.
3.What is the difference between a simple and a composite sentence?
4.What is the difference between one-member and elliptical sentence?
5.Which two minimal clauses does a complex sentence consist of?
6.Give one example of a semi-compound sentence.
7.Give one example of a mixed (intermediary) sentence type.
8.What is another term for subordination?
9.Give the definition of the ‘text’.
10.What is syndetic connection? Can compound sentences be connected asyndetically?
11.Give the definition of the rheme.
12.What are the cardinal communicative sentence types?
13.Give one example of a mixed (intermediary) sentence type.What is the difference between a compound and a complex sentence?
14.What is a predicative line?
15.Which two minimal clauses does a compound sentence consist of?
16.Give one example of a semi-complex sentence.
17.What is another term for coordination?
18.What textual categories do you know?
19.What is asyndetic connection? Can complex sentences be connected asyndetically?
|
» |
, |
- |
« |
|
|
, |
|
|
; |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
« |
|
|
» |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
. |
|||||
80 % |
|
|
||||||
|
« |
■ » |
● |
, |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|||
|
|
|
50 % |
|
||||
. |
|
|
■ |
|||||
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Literature
1. |
|
. |
. ♣ ♦ ♠ ♣ t ♦♦ ♥ ♣ r t♦ ♥ s r |
|||||||||||||||||
|
[ |
] / . . |
|
|
. – |
.: |
|
|
, 2009. – 160 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
2. |
♥ |
|
r♣ qr♣ |
♦ ♣ |
|
|
♥ |
|
|
|
[ ♥] / |
|||||||||
|
. |
., |
. . |
♣r r ♦ r r t♦ ♥ s r |
||||||||||||||||
|
. |
. r♣ qr♣, . . |
t♦. – |
.: |
sq- t♦. r ♦ ♥ ♣. |
s., 1960. – |
||||||||||||||
3. |
428 ♥. . . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ |
] / . |
. |
// |
|
|
||||
|
♦ r ♣ ♥ ♣ ♣ s r ♥ |
t |
|
♠♣ ♥ |
||||||||||||||||
|
s s r ♦, 2000. – |
4. – |
. 56–66. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
4. |
. |
. |
♣ ♦ ♥ ♦ ♥ ♣r r ♦ ♦. |
♦ [ ♥] / . . t. – |
||||||||||||||||
5. |
2- ♦sq., |
♦♥♠♣. – .: |
♥ r tr, 2000. – 160 |
♥. |
|
|
|
|
[ |
|
] / |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
t♦ ♦♥ ♦ ♦ s r t♦ ♦♥ ♦ ♦ |
♥ |
||||||||||||||||
6. |
. |
♣ q ♦ // |
s ♦ ♥ ♦rt ♠ s r ♦. – |
., 1990. – 134 |
♥. |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
. |
. |
|
, |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ |
] / . . |
|
|||
|
|
|
♣r ♦ ♠ ♦ r ♦ ♥ s ♥ r |
♥ |
|
r |
||||||||||||||
|
, . |
♦ // sr♣ t♦ ♦♥ ♦. |
♠. XXIII. |
♦ ♦ r♥- |
||||||||||||||||
|
♠ s r. – |
.: |
♣ ♣ ♥♥. – 1987. – |
. 153–206. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
7. |
|
. |
., |
|
. ., . . ♣ ♦ ♥ r ♣r r ♦ r ♥- |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ |
] / . |
. |
|
, . . |
|
|
, . . |
- |
|||
|
♣ r t♦ ♥ s r ♥ |
♥. |
r r |
♣tr r |
|
|
||||||||||||||
8. |
♠. – .: |
♥ . ., 1981. – 285 |
|
|
|
[ |
|
]: |
. |
|
|
/ |
||||||||
|
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
♣ ♥ ♣ r t♦ ♥ s r ♥ |
|
♠ ♥ ♦ |
||||||||||||||||
9. |
. |
. t ♦ . – |
.: |
♥ r tr. 2006.– 365 ♥. |
|
|
. – URL:http:// |
|||||||||||||
|
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
[ |
|
|
|
] / . . |
|||||||||
|
♦ ♣♦ ♥ ♦ q♦♥ ♣♥ |
t ♣ ♣ ♥ ♣♥ |
|
♦ ♣♦ |
|
|
|
/ |
||||||||||||
|
www.krugosvet.ru/enc/gumanitarnye_nauki/lingvistika/TEKST.html?page=0,0 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
( |
|
|
|
|
: 25.08.2017). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
10. |
qr r ♣r ♦ . . |
|
|
|
|
|
[ |
] / . . |
|
|
|
. – |
||||||||
|
|
|
♦ r ♥♦♥ ♥ s ♥ r |
♥ |
|
♠ ♦ r |
||||||||||||||
11. |
.: sq- , 1982. – 104 ♥. |
( |
|
: |
|
|
|
|
) |
[ |
|
] / |
||||||||
|
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
♦ ♦♥ ♦ r ♥ r |
♥ ♣ ♣r ♦ ♥ r ♦ r |
♥ |
||||||||||||||
12. |
. |
. ♣r r. – .: |
♣ ♥ ♦, 1986. – 126 ♥. |
|
[ |
] / . |
. |
. . |
- |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
s s r ♦ |
t ♦ t ♠ q♦ ♥ ♦ ♥t r♣ ♥ |
t ♣ q |
|
♣ |
|||||||||||||||
13. |
r. – 2- ♦sq. – .: t r ♥♥♦ ♥ r |
♦ t ♠ q♦ |
, 1998. – 685 ♥. |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Blokh M. Y. |
A Course in Theoretical English Grammar [Text] / M. Y. Blokh. – M.: |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Vysshaya shkola, 2000. – 382 p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
14. |
Blokh M. Y., Semionova T. N., Timofeyeva S. V. Theoretical English Grammar. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Seminars (♣r ♦ ♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ ♣r r ♦ r t♦ ♥ s r) [Text] / |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
M. Y. Blokh, T. N. Semionova, S. V. Timofeyeva – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2004. – |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
471 p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. |
Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis [Text]. – London, New York, 1992. – |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
266 p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. |
Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words [Text] / J. L. Austin // The William |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. – Oxford: Clarendon |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
press, 1962. – 163 p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
17. |
Bierwisch M. Modern Linguistics. Its Development, Methods and Problems [Text] / |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
M. Bierwisch. –The Hague; Paris: Mouton, 1971. – 105 p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
18. |
Brazil D. A. Grammar of Speech [Text] / D. A.Brazil. – Oxford: Oxford University |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Press, 1995. – 264 p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
19. |
Brown G., Yule G. Discourse Analysis [Text] / G.Brown, G.Yule. – Oxford: Oxford |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
University Press, 1990. – 212 p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
114
20.Coherence and Grounding in Discourse: Outcome of a Symp., Oregon, June 1984 [Text] // Edited by Russel S. Tomlin. – Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins publ, co., 1987. – 512 p.
21.Cook G. Applied Linguistics [Text] / G. Cook // Series editor H. G. Widdowson. – Oxford University Press, 2006. – 134 p.
22.Crystal D. Linguistics [Text] / D. Crystal. – Penguin books, 1990. – 2nd edition. – 276 p.
23.Dijk T. A. Studies in Pragmatics of Discourse [Text] / T. A. Dijk. – The Hague: Monton, 1981. – 285 p.
24.Dijk T. A. Some Aspects of Text Grammar [Text] / T. Dijk. – The Hague; Paris: Maouton, 1972. – 375 p.
25.Halliday M. A. K. Cohesion in English [Text] / M. A. K. Halliday, R. Hasan. – London: Longman Group LTD, 1976. – 374 p.
26.Harris Z. Z. Discourse Analysis [Text] / Z. Z. Harris // Language, 1952. – V. 28,
1.
27. Searle J. R. On Locutionary and Illocutionary acts [Text] / J. R. Searle, J. L. Aus-
tin // The Philosophical Review. Vol. 77, 3. – 1968. – P. 405–421.
