Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

5 курс / Пульмонология и фтизиатрия / Clinical_Tuberculosis_Friedman_Lloyd_N_,_Dedicoat

.pdf
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
24.03.2024
Размер:
25.27 Mб
Скачать

320  Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

88.Nelson KN et al. Spatial patterns of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-tuberculosis) transmission in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Infect Dis. 2018;218.

89.Fiebig L et al. A joint cross-border investigation of a cluster of mul- tidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Austria, Romania and Germany in 2014 using classic, genotyping and whole genome sequencing methods: Lessons learnt. Euro Surveill. 2017;22.

90.Hargreaves S, Lonnroth K, Nellums LB, Olaru ID, Nathavitharana RR, Norredam M, and Friedland JS. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and migration to Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23:141–6.

91.Gautam SS, Mac Aogain M, Cooley LA, Haug G, Fyfe JA, Globan M, and O’Toole RF. Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in Tasmania and genomic characterisation of its first known multidrug resistant case. PLOS ONE. 2018;13:e0192351.

92.Jensenius M et al. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Norway: A nationwide study, 1995–2014. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20:786–92.

93.Hargreaves S, Lonnroth K, Nellums LB, Olaru ID, Nathavitharana RR, Norredam M, and Friedland JS. Response to Letter to the Editor by M. van der Werf, V. Hollo and C. Kodmon concerning “Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and migration to Europe”. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23:580.

94.Coscolla M et al. Genomic epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis during transcontinental spread. J Infect Dis 2015;212:302–10.

95.Regmi SM, Chaiprasert A, Kulawonganunchai S, Tongsima S, Coker OO, Prammananan T, Viratyosin W, and Thaipisuttikul

I.Whole genome sequence analysis of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing isolates from an outbreak in Thailand. Mol Genet Genomics. 2015;290:1933–41.

96.Popovici O et al. Cross-border outbreak of extensively drug-resis- tant tuberculosis linked to a university in Romania. Epidemiol Infect. 2018;146:824–31.

97.Perez-Lago L, Martinez-Lirola M, Garcia S, Herranz M, Mokrousov I, Comas I, Martinez-Priego L, Bouza E, and Garcia- de-Viedma D. Urgent implementation in a hospital setting of a strategy to rule out secondary cases caused by imported extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains at diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:2969–74.

98.Smith CM, Lessells R, Grant AD, Herbst K, and Tanser F. Spatial clustering of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Hlabisa subdistrict, KwaZulu-Natal, 2011–2015. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018;22:287–93.

99.Kapwata T et al. Spatial distribution of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR TB) patients in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. PLOS ONE. 2017;12:e0181797.

100.Doyle RM et al. Direct whole genome sequencing of sputum accurately identifies drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis faster than MGIT culture sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2018.

101.McNerney R, Clark TG, Campino S, Rodrigues C, Dolinger D, Smith L, Cabibbe AM, Dheda K, and Schito M. Removing the bottleneck in whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for rapid drug resistance analysis: A call to action. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;56:130–5.

102.Mahomed S, Naidoo K, Dookie N, and Padayatchi N. Whole genome sequencing for the management of drug-resistant TB in low income high TB burden settings: Challenges and implications.

Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2017;107:137–43.

103.Votintseva AA et al. Same-day diagnostic and surveillance data for tuberculosis via whole-genome sequencing of direct respiratory samples. J Clin Microbiol 2017;55:1285–98.

104.Dookie N, Rambaran S, Padayatchi N, Mahomed S, and Naidoo

K.Evolution of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A review on the molecular determinants of resistance and

implications for personalized care. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73:1138–51.

105.Shea J, Halse TA, Lapierre P, Shudt M, Kohlerschmidt D, Van Roey P, Limberger R, Taylor J, Escuyer V, and Musser KA. Comprehensive whole-genome sequencing and reporting of drug resistance profiles on clinical cases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in New York State. J Clin Microbiol 2017;55:1871–82.

106.Brown TS, Narechania A, Walker JR, Planet PJ, Bifani PJ, Kolokotronis SO, Kreiswirth BN, and Mathema B. Genomic epidemiology of Lineage 4 Mycobacterium tuberculosis subpopulations in New York City and New Jersey, 1999–2009. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:947.

107.Aung HL et al. Whole-genome sequencing of multidrug-resis- tant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Myanmar. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2016;6:113–7.

108.Kidenya BR, Mshana SE, Fitzgerald DW, and Ocheretina O. Genotypic drug resistance using whole-genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from North-western Tanzania. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2018;109:97–101.

109.Black PA et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals genomic heterogeneity and antibiotic purification in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:857.

110.Metcalfe JZ, Streicher E, Theron G, Colman RE, Penaloza R, Allender C, Lemmer D, Warren RM, and Engelthaler DM. Mycobacterium tuberculosis subculture results in loss of potentially clinically relevant heteroresistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61.

111.Colman RE et al. Detection of low-level mixed-population drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis using high fidelity amplicon sequencing. PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0126626.

112.Metcalfe JZ, Streicher E, Theron G, Colman RE, Allender C, Lemmer D, Warren R, and Engelthaler DM. Cryptic microheteroresistance explains Mycobacterium tuberculosis phenotypic resistance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:1191–201.

113.Cox H, Hughes J, Daniels J, Azevedo V, McDermid C, Poolman M, Boulle A, Goemaere E, and van Cutsem G. Community-based treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Khayelitsha, South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18:441–8.

114.Dave P et al. Has introduction of rapid drug susceptibility testing at diagnosis impacted treatment outcomes among previously treated tuberculosis patients in Gujarat, India? PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0121996.

115.Loveday M, Wallengren K, Voce A, Margot B, Reddy T, Master I, Brust J, Chaiyachati K, and Padayatchi N. Comparing early treatment outcomes of MDR-TB in decentralised and centralised settings in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16:209–15.

116.Dheda K, Gumbo T, Gandhi NR, Murray M, Theron G, Udwadia Z, Migliori G, and Warren R. Global control of tuberculosis: From extensively drug-resistant to untreatable tuberculosis. Lancet Resp Med. 2014;2:321–38.

117.Parrish N, and Carrol K. Importance of improved TB diagnostics in addressing the extensively drug-resistant TB crisis. Future Microbiol. 2008;3:405–13.

118.Dheda K et al. Outcomes, infectiousness, and transmission dynamics of patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis and homedischarged patients with programmatically incurable tuberculosis: A prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:269–81.

119.Sharma A et al. and Global Preserving Effective TBTSI. Estimating the future burden of multidrug-resistant and extensively drugresistant tuberculosis in India, the Philippines, Russia, and South Africa: A mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:707–15.

Книга в списке рекомендаций к покупке и прочтению сайта https://meduniver.com/

References  321

120.Kim SJ. Drug-susceptibility testing in tuberculosis: Methods and reliability of results. Eur Respir J. 2005;25:564–9.

121.Van Deun A, Maug AK, Bola V, Lebeke R, Hossain MA, de Rijk WB, Rigouts L, Gumusboga A, Torrea G, and de Jong BC. Rifampicin drug resistance tests for tuberculosis: Challenging the gold standard. J Clin Microbiol. 2013.

122.Sanchez-Padilla E, Merker M, Beckert P, Jochims F, Dlamini T, Kahn P, Bonnet M, and Niemann S. Detection of drug-resistant tuberculosis by Xpert MTB/RIF in Swaziland. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1181–2.

123.Martin A, and Portaels F. Methods for detection of drug resistance. In: Palomino J, Cardoso Leão S, Ritacco V (eds.). Tuberculosis 2007; From Basic Science to Patient Care. On Line: Amedeo, 2007. 640–54.

124.Brady MF, Coronel J, Gilman RH, and Moore DA. The MODS method for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistant tuberculosis. J Vis Exp. 2008;18.

125.Huyen MN, Cobelens FG, Buu TN, Lan NT, Dung NH, Kremer K, Tiemersma EW, and van Soolingen D. Epidemiology of isoniazid resistance mutations and their effect on tuberculosis treatment outcomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:3620–7.

126.Chien JY, Chien ST, Chiu WY, Yu CJ, and Hsueh PR. Moxifloxacin improves treatment outcomes in patients with ofloxacin-resistant multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:4708–16.

127.Barrera L et al. Policy Guidance on Drug-Susceptibility Testing (DST) of Second-Line Antituberculosis Drugs. WHO. Geneva, 2008.

128.Ogwang S et al. Comparison of rapid tests for detection of rifam- picin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda.

BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:139.

129.Coll F, McNerney R, Preston M, Guerra-Assunção JA, Warry A, and Hill-Cawthorn G. Rapid determination of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance from whole-genome sequences. Genome Med. 2015;7.

130.Farhat MR et al. Genetic determinants of drug resistance in

Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their diagnostic value. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194.

131.Telenti A, Imboden P, Marchesi F, Lowrie D, Cole S, Colston MJ, Matter L, Schopfer K, and Bodmer T. Detection of rifampicinresistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lancet. 1993;341:647–50.

132.Steingart KR. Xpert MTB/RIF test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. J Evid Based Med. 2013;6:58.

133.Theron G, Zijenah L, Chanda D, Clowes P, Rachow A, Lesosky M, Bara W, Mungofa S, Pai M, and Hoelscher M. Feasibility, accuracy, and clinical effect of point-of-care Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis in primary-care settings in Africa: A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;383:424–35.

134.World Health Organization. Automated real-time nucleic acid amplification technology for rapid and simultaneous detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: Xpert MTB/RIF system for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB in adults and children. Publication number WHO/HTM/TB/2013.14. Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.

135.Press statement. FDA permits marketing of first U.S. test labeled for simultaneous detection of tuberculosis bacteria and resistance to the antibiotic rifampin. Available at; http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/ Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm362602.htm (last accessed January 13, 2014). Federal Drug Administration, 2013.

136.Steingart KR, Schiller I, Horne DJ, Pai M, Boehme CC, and Dendukuri N. Xpert(R) MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD009593;1.

137.Dorman SE et al. and Denkinger CM, study t. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: A prospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.

Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:76–84.

138.Bahr NC et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for tuberculous meningitis in HIV-infected adults: A prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:68–75.

139.Calligaro GL et al. Effect of new tuberculosis diagnostic technologies on community-based intensified case finding: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:441–50.

140.Baez-Saldana R et al. Isoniazid mono-resistant tuberculosis: Impact on treatment outcome and survival of pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Southern Mexico 1995–2010. PLOS ONE. 2016;11:e0168955.

141.Jenkins HE, Zignol M, and Cohen T. Quantifying the burden and trends of isoniazid resistant tuberculosis, 1994–2009. PLOS ONE. 2011;6:e22927.

142.Trajman A, Durovni B, Saraceni V, Cordeiro-Santos M, Cobelens F, and van den Hof S. High positive predictive value of Xpert in a low rifampicin resistance prevalence setting. Eur Respir J. 2014;44.

143.WHO. Molecular line probe assays for rapid screening of patients at risk of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) 2008 [Cited 2008 May]. Available at: http://www.who.int/tb/features_archive/ expert_group_report_june08.pdf

144.Barnard M, van Pittius NCG, van Helden P, Bosman M, Coetzee G, and Warren R. Diagnostic performance of Genotype® MTBDRplus Version 2 line probe assay is equivalent to the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50.

145.Crudu V, Stratan E, Romancenco E, Allerheiligen V, Hillemann A, and Moraru N. First evaluation of an improved assay for molecular genetic detection of tuberculosis as well as RMP and INH resistances. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:1264–9.

146.Tomasicchio M, Theron G, Pietersen E, Streicher E, Stanley-Josephs D, van Helden P, Warren R, and Dheda K. The diagnostic accuracy of the MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl assays for drug-resistant TB detection when performed on sputum and culture isolates. Sci Rep. 2016;6:17850.

147.Meaza A et al. Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples. BMC Infect Dis 2017;17:280.

148.Theron G, Peter J, Barnard M, Donegan S, Warren R, Steingart KR, and Dheda K. The GenoType® MTBDRsl test for resistance to sec- ond-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. Cochrane Lib. 2013;10:CD010705.

149.Theron G, Peter J, Richardson M, Warren R, Dheda K, and Steingart KR. GenoType((R)) MTBDRsl assay for resistance to second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9:CD010705.

150.World Health Organization. The use of molecular line probe assays for the detection of resistance to second-line anti-tubercu- losis drugs. Policy guidance (WHO/HTM/TB/2016.07). Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.

151.Tagliani E et al. Diagnostic performance of the new version (v2.0) of GenoType MTBDRsl assay for detection of resistance to fluoroquinolones and second-line injectable drugs: A Multicenter Study. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:2961–9.

152.Orenstein E, Basu S, Shah N, Andrews J, Friedland G, Moll A, Gandhi N, and Galvani A. Treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:153–61.

153.Votintseva AA et al. Mycobacterial DNA extraction for wholegenome sequencing from early positive liquid (MGIT) cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:1137–43.

322  Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

154.Theron G, Peter J, Richardson M, Barnard M, Donegan S, Warren R, Steingart KR, and Dheda K. The diagnostic accuracy of the GenoType((R)) MTBDRsl assay for the detection of resistance to second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:Cd010705;10.

155.Steingart K, Sohn H, Schiller I, Kloda L, Boehme C, Pai M, and Dendukuri N. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;1.

156.TB DOTS Strategy Coordination Directorate. National Tuberculosis Control Guidelines. Pretoria: Department of Health, Republic of South Africa, 2014.

157.Dlamini-Mvelase NR, Werner L, Phili R, Cele LP, and Mlisana KP. Effects of introducing Xpert MTB/RIF test on multi-drug resistant tuberculosis diagnosis in KwaZulu-Natal South Africa. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:442.

158.Saúde BMd. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde Programa Nacional de Controle da Tuberculose (2013) Programa Nacional de Controle da Tuberculose, 2013.

159.World Health Organization. Rapid Communication: Key changes to treatment of multidrugand rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB), 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available at: http://www.who.int/tb/publications

160.Diseases NIo++C. South African National Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Study, 2014 [cited 2017, April 5, 2017]. Available at: http:// www.nicd.ac.za/assets/files/K-12750%20NICD%20National%20 Survey%20Report_Dev_V11-LR.pdf

161.Gunther G et al. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Europe, 2010– 2011. Emerg Infect Dis 2015;21:409–16.

162.Yuen CM et al. Association between regimen composition and treatment response in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A prospective cohort study. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001932.

163.The Collaborative Group for the Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data in MDR-TB treatment–2017: Nafees Ahmad, Shama D Ahuja OWA, Jan W C Alffenaar, Laura F Anderson, Parvaneh Baghaei, Didi Bang, Pennan M Barry, Mayara L Bastos,, Digamber Behera AB, Greg P Bisson, Martin Boeree, Maryline Bonnet, Sarah K Brode, James C M Brust, Ying Cai, Geisa F Carlessso,, Eric Caumes JPC, Rosella Centis, Pei-Chun Chan, Edward D Chan, Kwok-Chiu Chang, Macarthur Charles, Andra Cirule,, Margareth Pretti Dalcolmo LDA, Gerard de Vries, Keertan Dheda, Aliasgar Esmail, Jennifer Flood, Gregory Fox, Regina Gayoso,, Medea Gegia MTG, Sue Gu, Lorenzo Guglielmetti, Timothy H Holtz, Jennifer Hughes, Petros Isaakidis, Mathilde FrechetJachym,, Leah Jarlsberg RRK, Salmaan Keshavjee, Faiz Ahmad Khan, Maia Kipiani, Serena P Koenig, Won-Jung Koh, Afranio Kritski, Liga Kuksa, Charlotte L Kvasnovsky NK, Zhiyi Lan, Christoph Lange, Rafael Laniado-Laborín, Myungsun Lee, Vaira Leimane, Chi-Chiu Leung, Eric Chung-Ching Leung PZL, Phil Lowenthal, Ethel L Maciel, Suzanne M Marks, Sundari Mase, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Giovanni B Migliori, Vladimir Milanov ACM, Carole Mitnick, Chawangwa Modongo, Erika Mohr, Ignacio Monedero, Payam Nahid, Norbert Ndjeka, Max R O’Donnell NP, Domingo Palmero, Jean William Pape, Laura J Podewils, Ian Reynolds, Vija Riekstina, Jérôme Robert, Maria Rodriguez BS, Kwonjune J Seung, Kathryn Schnippel, Tae Sun Shim, Rupak Singla, Sarah E Smith, Giovanni Sotgiu, Ganzaya Sukhbaatar PT, Simon Tiberi, Anete Trajman, Lisa Trieu, Zarir F Udwadia, Tjip S van der Werf, Nicolas Veziris, Piret Viiklepp, Stalz Charles Vilbrun KW, Janice Westenhouse, Wing-Wai Yew, Jae-Joon Yim, Nicola M Zetola, Matteo Zignol, Dick Menzies. Treatment correlates of successful outcomes in pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet 2018; THELANCET-D- 18-00963R1, S0140-6736(18)31644–1.

164.WHO. WHO Treatment Guidelines for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, 2016 Update. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisaion, 2016.

165.WHO Treatment Guidelines for Multidrugand RifampicinResistant Tuberculosis 2018 Update (pre-final text) Annex 8. World Health Organization, 2018.

166.Ndjeka N et al. Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis with bedaquiline in a high HIV prevalence setting: An interim cohort analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19:979–85.

167.Olayanju O, Limberis J, Esmail A, Oelofse S, Gina P, Pietersen E, Fadul M, Warren R, and Dheda K. Long-term bedaquiline-related treatment outcomes in patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis from South Africa. Eur Respir J. 2018;51.

168.Schnippel K et al. Effect of bedaquiline on mortality in South African patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6.

169.Diacon AH et al. Randomized pilot trial of eight weeks of bedaquiline (TMC207) treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: Long-term outcome, tolerability, and effect on emergence of drug resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012;56:3271–6.

170.Diacon AH et al. The diarylquinoline TMC207 for multidrug-resis- tant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2397–405.

171.Court RG, Wiesner L, Chirehwa MT, Stewart A, de Vries N, Harding J, Gumbo T, McIlleron H, and Maartens G. Effect of lidocaine on kanamycin injection-site pain in patients with multidrugresistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018;22:926–30.

172.Guglielmetti L, Tiberi S, Burman M, Kunst H, Wejse C, Togonidze T, Bothamley G, Lange C, and TBnet, of the TQs. QT prolongation and cardiac toxicity of new tuberculosis drugs in Europe: A Tuberculosis Network European Trials group (TBnet) study. Eur Respir J. 2018;52.

173.Shean K et al. Drug-associated adverse events and their relationship with outcomes in patients receiving treatment for extensively drugresistant tuberculosis in South Africa. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e63057.

174.Olayanju O, Esmail A, Limberis J, Gina P, and Dheda K. Linezolid interruption in patients with fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis receiving a bedaquiline-based treatment regimen. Int J Infect Dis, 2019;85:74–9.

175.Zhang X, Falagas ME, Vardakas KZ, Wang R, Qin R, Wang J, and Liu Y. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of therapy with linezolid containing regimens in the treatment of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:603–15.

176.Fortún J, Martín-Dávila P, Navas E, Pérez-Elías MJ, Cobo J, Tato M, De la Pedrosa EG-G, Gómez-Mampaso E, and Moreno S. Linezolid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56:180–5.

177.Sirgel FA, Warren RM, Bottger EC, Klopper M, Victor TC, and van Helden PD. The rationale for using rifabutin in the treatment of MDR and XDR tuberculosis outbreaks. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e59414.

178.Diacon AH, van der Merwe L, Barnard M, von Groote-Bidlingmaier F, Lange C, Garcia-Basteiro AL, Sevene E, Ballell L, and BarrosAguirre D. beta-Lactams against tuberculosis—New trick for an old dog? N Engl J Med. 2016;375:393–4.

179.Payen MC, Muylle I, Vandenberg O, Mathys V, Delforge M, Van den Wijngaert S, Clumeck N, and De Wit S. Meropenem-clavulanate for drug-resistant tuberculosis: A follow-up of relapse-free cases.

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018;22:34–9.

180.Organisation WH. WHO position statement on the use of delamanid for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: Expedited review of the phase III clinical trial data of delamanid added to an optimised background MDR-TB regimen: WHO; 2018 No. CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

Книга в списке рекомендаций к покупке и прочтению сайта https://meduniver.com/

References  323

181.Tiemersma EW, van der Werf MJ, Borgdorff MW, Williams BG, and Nagelkerke NJ. Natural history of tuberculosis: Duration and fatality of untreated pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV negative patients: A systematic review. PLOS ONE. 2011;6:e17601.

182.Giddings O, Kuhn J, and Akulian J. Endobronchial valve placement for the treatment of bronchopleural fistula: A review of the current literature. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2014;20:347–51.

183.Deshpande D, Srivastava S, Chapagain M, Magombedze G, Martin KR, Cirrincione KN, Lee PS, Koeuth T, Dheda K, and Gumbo T. Ceftazidime-avibactam has potent sterilizing activity against highly drug-resistant tuberculosis. Sci Adv. 2017;3:e1701102.

184.Kawada H, Yamazato M, Shinozawa Y, Suzuki K, Otani S, Ouchi M, and Miyairi M. Achievement of sputum culture negative conversion by minocycline in a case with extensively drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Kekkaku(Tuberculosis). 2008;83:725–8.

185.World Health Organization. The Role of Surgery in the Treatment of Pulmonary TB and Multidrugand Extensively Drug-Resistant TB. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization European Region Office, 2014.

186.Fox GJ et al. Surgery as an adjunctive treatment for multidrugresistant tuberculosis: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:887–95.

187.Borisov SE et al. Outcomes of patients with drug-resistant-tubercu- losis treated with bedaquiline-containing regimens and undergoing adjunctive surgery. J Infect. 2018;78.

188.Calligaro GL, Moodley L, Symons G, and Dheda K. The medical and surgical treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:186–95.

189.Isaakidis P, Casas EC, Das M, Tseretopoulou X, Ntzani EE, and Ford N. Treatment outcomes for HIV and MDR-TB co-infected adults and children: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19:969–78.

190.WHO. Guidelines for the Programmatic Management of DrugResistant Tuberculosis. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011. No. WHO/HTM/TB/2009.420.

191.Abdool Karim SS et al. Integration of antiretroviral therapy with tuberculosis treatment. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1492–501.

192.BlancFXetal.EarlierversuslaterstartofantiretroviraltherapyinHIVinfected adults with tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1471–81.

193.Havlir DV et al. and A ACTGS. Timing of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection and tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1482–91.

194.Marais S, Pepper DJ, Marais BJ, and Torok ME. HIV-associated tuberculous meningitis—Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2010;90:367–74.

195.Torok ME et al. Timing of initiation of antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)—Associated tuberculous meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:1374–83.

196.WHO. Consolidated Guidelines on the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection. World Health Organization, 2016.

197.SasabeH,ShimokawaY,ShibataM,HashizumeK,HamasakoY,Ohzone Y, Kashiyama E, and Umehara K. Antitubercular agent delamanid and metabolites as substrates and inhibitors of ABC and solute carrier transporters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:3497–508.

198.UCSF. Database of Antiretroviral Drug Interactions. 2017. Available at: http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/insite?pagear-00-02& param=235&post=4

199.Adhikari M. Tuberculosis and tuberculosis/HIV co-infection in pregnancy. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14:234–40.

200.Jana N, Vasishta K, Jindal SK, Khunnu B, and Ghosh K. Perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by pulmonary tuberculosis.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994;44:119–24.

201.Mathad JS, and Gupta A. Tuberculosis in pregnant and postpartum women: Epidemiology, management, and research gaps. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:1532–49.

202.Nachega J, Coetzee J, Adendorff T, Msandiwa R, Gray GE, McIntyre JA, and Chaisson RE. Tuberculosis active case-finding in a mother- to-child HIV transmission prevention programme in Soweto, South Africa. AIDS. 2003;17:1398–400.

203.Sugarman J, Colvin C, Moran AC, Oxlade O. Tuberculosis in pregnancy: An estimate of the global burden of disease. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e710–716.

204.Singh N, and Perfect JR. Immune reconstitution syndrome and exacerbation of infections after pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1192–9.

205.Palacios E et al. Drug-resistant tuberculosis and pregnancy: Treatment outcomes of 38 cases in Lima, Peru. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:1413–9.

206.Tabarsi P et al. Standardised second-line treatment of multidrugresistant tuberculosis during pregnancy. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15:547–50.

207.WHO. Companion Handbook to the WHO Guidelines for the Programmatic Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2014.

208.Zvandasara P et al. Mortality and morbidity among postpartum HIV-positive and HIV-negative women in Zimbabwe: Risk factors, causes, and impact of single-dose postpartum vitamin A supplementation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43:107–16.

209.Gupta A et al. and Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Medical College-Johns Hopkins University Study G. Postpartum tuberculosis incidence and mortality among HIV-infected women and their infants in Pune, India, 2002–2005. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:241–9.

210.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Provisional CDC guidelines for the use and safety monitoring of bedaquiline fumarate (Sirturo) for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013;62:1–12.

211.SIRTURO: Highlights of Prescribing Information: FDA Access Data, 2012.

212.Best-Practice Statement on the Off-Label Use of Bedaquiline and Delamanid for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. World Health Organization, 2017.

213.Reid A et al. and Development of Antiretroviral Therapy T. Severe renal dysfunction and risk factors associated with renal impairment in HIV-infected adults in Africa initiating antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1271–81.

214.Kasembeli AN, Duarte R, Ramsay M, and Naicker S. African origins and chronic kidney disease susceptibility in the human immunodeficiency virus era. World J Nephrol. 2015;4:295–306.

215.Bige N et al. Presentation of HIV-associated nephropathy and outcome in HAART-treated patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:1114–21.

216.Williams DI, Williams DJ, Williams IG, Unwin RJ, Griffiths MH, and Miller RF. Presentation, pathology, and outcome of HIV associated renal disease in a specialist centre for HIV/AIDS. Sex Transm Infect. 1998;74:179–84.

217.Ramsuran D, Bhimma R, Ramdial PK, Naicker E, Adhikari M, Deonarain J, Sing Y, and Naicker T. The spectrum of HIV-related nephropathy in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012;27:821–7.

218.Wong WM, Wu PC, Yuen MF, Cheng CC, Yew WW, Wong PC, Tam CM, Leung CC, and Lai CL. Antituberculosis drug-related liver dysfunction in chronic hepatitis B infection. Hepatology. 2000;31:201–6.

219.Patel PA, and Voigt MD. Prevalence and interaction of hepatitis B and latent tuberculosis in Vietnamese immigrants to the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1198–203.

324  Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

\ 220.\ Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected

multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients treated in Virginia,

Adults and Adolescents, AIDSInfo, 2016.

 

2009–2014. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2015;78:78–84.

\ 221.\ Prevention CfDCa. Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of

\ 240.\ Vu DH, Bolhuis MS, Koster RA, Greijdanus B, de Lange WC, van

Opportunistic Infections in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents,

Altena R, Brouwers JR, Uges DR, and Alffenaar JW. Dried blood

AIDSInfo, 2016.

 

 

 

spot analysis for therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid in

\ 222.\ Restrepo BI, and Schlesinger LS. Impact of diabetes on the natural

patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents

history of tuberculosis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;106:191–9.

Chemother. 2012;56:5758–63.

\ 223.\ Salindri AD, Kipiani M, Kempker RR, Gandhi NR, Darchia L,

\ 241.\ Vu DH, Koster RA, Alffenaar JW, Brouwers JR, and Uges DR.

Tukvadze N, Blumberg HM, and Magee MJ. Diabetes reduces the rate

Determination of moxifloxacin in dried blood spots using

of sputum culture conversion in patients with newly diagnosed multi-

LC-MS/MS and the impact of the hematocrit and blood volume. J

drug-resistant tuberculosis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016;3:ofw126.

Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2011;879:1063–70.

\ 224.\ Baghaei P, Tabarsi P, Javanmard P, Farnia P, Marjani M, Moniri

\ 242.\ Heyckendorf J et al. Treatment responses in multidrug-resistant

A, Masjedi MR, and Velayati AA. Impact of diabetes mellitus on

tuberculosis in Germany. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018;22:399–406.

tuberculosis drug resistance in new cases of tuberculosis. J Glob

\ 243.\ Olaru ID, Heyckendorf J, Grossmann S, and Lange C. Time to

Antimicrob Resist. 2016;4:1–4.

 

culture positivity and sputum smear microscopy during tubercu-

\ 225.\ Perez-Navarro LM, Fuentes-Dominguez FJ, and Zenteno-Cuevas R.

losis therapy. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(8):e106075. doi: 10.1371/journal.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and its influence in the development of mul-

pone.0106075.

tidrug resistance tuberculosis in patients from southeastern Mexico. J

\ 244.\ Günther G et al. Treatment outcomes in multidrug-resistant tuber-

Diabetes Complications. 2015;29:77–82.

 

culosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1103–5.

\ 226.\ Slama L, Palella FJ, Jr., Abraham AG, Li X, Vigouroux C, Pialoux

\ 245.\ Heyckendorf J, Olaru ID, Ruhwald M, and Lange C. Getting per-

G, Kingsley L, Lake JE, and Brown TT. Inaccuracy of haemoglo-

sonal perspectives on individualized treatment duration in mul-

bin A1c among HIV-infected men: Effects of CD4 cell count, anti-

tidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J

retroviral therapies and haematological parameters. J Antimicrob

Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:374–83.

Chemother 2014;69:3360–7.

 

\ 246.\ van Cutsem G, Isaakidis P, Farley J, Nardell E, Volchenkov G,

\ 227.\ Scheen AJ, and Paquot N. Metformin revisited: A critical review

and Cox H. Infection control for drug-resistant tuberculosis:

of the benefit-risk balance in at-risk patients with type 2 diabetes.

Early diagnosis and treatment is key. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(S3):​

Diabetes Metab. 2013;39:179–90.

 

S238–43.

\ 228.\ Heller S et al. Considerations for assessing the potential effects

\ 247.\ Schaberg T et al. Tuberculosis guideline for adults—Guideline for

of antidiabetes drugs on cardiac ventricular repolarization: A

diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis including LTBI testing

report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium. Am Heart J.

and treatment of the German Central Committee (DZK) and the

2015;170:23–35.

 

 

 

German Respiratory Society (DGP). Pneumologie. 2017;71:325–97.

\ 229.\ Tolman KG, and Chandramouli J. Hepatotoxicity of the thiazoli-

\ 248.\ Dowdy DW, Azman AS, Kendall EA, and Mathema B. Transforming

dinediones. Clin Liver Dis 2003;7:369–79, vi.

 

the fight against tuberculosis: Targeting catalysts of transmission.

\ 230.\ Chiang CY et al. Glycemic control and radiographic manifesta-

Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:1123–9.

tions of tuberculosis in diabetic patients. PLOS ONE 2014;9:e93397.

\ 249.\ Keshavjee S, and Farmer PE. History of tuberculosis and drug

\ 231.\ Ruslami R, Aarnoutse RE, Alisjahbana B, van der Ven AJ, and

resistance. N Engl J Med 2013;368:89–90.

van Crevel R. Implications of the global increase of diabetes

\ 250.\ Nicholson T, Admay C, Shakow A, and Keshavjee S. Double stan-

for tuberculosis control and patient care. Trop Med Int Health.

dards in global health: medicine, human rights law and multidrug-

2010;15:1289–99.

 

 

 

resistant TB treatment policy. Health Hum Rights 2016;18:85–102.

\ 232.\ Niazi AK, and Kalra S. Diabetes and tuberculosis: A review of the role

\ 251.\ Amon JJ, . Limitations on human rights in the context of drug-resis-

of optimal glycemic control. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2012;11:28.

tant tuberculosis: A reply to Boggio et al. HHR Journal. 2009;11.

\ 233.\ Lee PH, Lin HC, Huang AS, Wei SH, Lai MS, and Lin HH. Diabetes

\ 252.\ London L, Cox H, and Coomans F. Multidrug-resistant TB:

and risk of tuberculosis relapse: Nationwide nested case-control

Implementing the right to health through the right to enjoy the

study. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e92623.

 

benefits of scientific progress. Health Hum Rights. 2016;18:25–41.

\ 234.\ Wang JY, Lee MC, Shu CC, Lee CH, Lee LN, Chao KM, Chang FY.

\ 253.\ Kastor A, and Mohanty SK. Disease-specific out-of-pocket and

Optimal duration of anti-TB treatment in patients with diabetes:

catastrophic health expenditure on hospitalization in India: Do

Nine or six months? Chest. 2015;147:520–8.

 

Indian households face distress health financing? PLOS ONE.

\ 235.\ Hung CL, Chien JY, Ou CY. Associated factors for tuberculosis

2018;13:e0196106.

recurrence in Taiwan: A nationwide nested case-control study

\ 254.\ Toczek A, Cox H, du Cros P, Cooke G, Ford N. Strategies for reduc-

from 1998 to 2010. PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0124822.

 

ing treatment default in drug-resistant tuberculosis: Systematic

\ 236.\ Riza AL et al. Clinical management of concurrent diabetes and

review and meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013;17:299–307.

tuberculosis and the implications for patient services. Lancet

\ 255.\ Benbaba S, Isaakidis P, Das M, Jadhav S, Reid T, and Furin J. Direct

Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:740–53.

 

observation (DO) for drug-resistant tuberculosis: Do we really do?

\ 237.\ Calligaro GL et al. Burden of tuberculosis in intensive care units

PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0144936.

in Cape Town, South Africa, and assessment of the accuracy and

\ 256.\ Keshavjee S, Dowdy D, and Swaminathan S. Stopping the body

effect on patient outcomes of the Xpert MTB/RIF test on tracheal

count: A comprehensive approach to move towards zero tuberculo-

aspirate samples for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: A pro-

sis deaths. Lancet. 2015;386:e46–47.

spective burden of disease study with a nested randomised con-

\ 257.\ Reuter A et al. The devil we know: Is the use of injectable agents

trolled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3:621–30.

 

for the treatment of MDR-TB justified? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis.

\ 238.\ Alsultan A, and Peloquin CA. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the

2017;21:1114–26.

treatment of tuberculosis: An update. Drugs. 2014;74:839–54.

\ 258.\ Harding R, Foley KM, Connor SR, and Jaramillo E. Palliative and

\ 239.\ Heysell SK, Moore

JL,

Peloquin CA, Ashkin

D, and Houpt

end-of-life care in the global response to multidrug-resistant tuber-

ER. Outcomes and

use

of therapeutic drug

monitoring in

culosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:643–6.

Книга в списке рекомендаций к покупке и прочтению сайта https://meduniver.com/

References  325

259.Hughes J, and Snyman L. Palliative care for drug-resistant tuberculosis: When new drugs are not enough. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:251–2.

260.Union T. South Africa Announces Lower Price for TB Drug Bedaquiline. International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2018.

261.Jenkins HE et al. Assessing spatial heterogeneity of multidrugresistant tuberculosis in a high-burden country. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:1291–301.

262.Farhat MR et al. Genetic determinants of drug resistance in

Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their diagnostic value. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:621–30.

263.Daum LT, Rodriguez JD, Worthy SA, Ismail NA, Omar SV, Dreyer AW, Fourie PB, Hoosen AA, Chambers JP, and Fischer GW. Nextgeneration ion torrent sequencing of drug resistance mutations in

Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:3831–7.

264.Farhat MR et al. Genomic analysis identifies targets of convergent positive selection in drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1183–9.

265.Zhang HT et al. Genome sequencing of 161 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from China identifies genes and intergenic regions associated with drug resistance. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1255–U1217.

266.Stucki D et al. Tracking a tuberculosis outbreak over 21 years: Strainspecific single-nucleotide polymorphism typing combined with targeted whole-genome sequencing. J Infect Dis. 2015;211:1306–16.

267.Mokrousov I et al. Trends in molecular epidemiology of drug-resis- tant tuberculosis in Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:279.

268.Zanini F, Carugati M, Schiroli C, Lapadula G, Lombardi A, Codecasa L, Gori A, and Franzetti F. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing family: Analysis of the epidemiological and clinical factors associated with an emerging lineage in the urban area of Milan.

Infect Genet Evol. 2014;25:14–9.

269.Yen S, Bower JE, Freeman JT, Basu I, and O’Toole RF. Phylogenetic lineages of tuberculosis isolates in New Zealand and their association with patient demographics. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013;17:892–7.

270.Vasankari T, Soini H, Liippo K, and Ruutu P. MDR-TB in Finland— Still rare despite the situation in our neighbouring countries. Clin Respir J. 2012;6:35–9.

271.Rovina N, Karabela S, Constantoulakis P, Michou V, Konstantinou K, Sgountzos V, Roussos C, and Poulakis N. MIRU-VNTR typing of drug-resistant tuberculosis isolates in Greece. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2011;5:229–36.

272.Bernard C, Brossier F, Sougakoff W, Veziris N, Frechet-Jachym M, Metivier N, Renvoise A, Robert J, Jarlier V, and NRC M-TMgot. A surge of MDR and XDR tuberculosis in France among patients born in the Former Soviet Union. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:20555.

273.Kubica T, Rusch-Gerdes S, and Niemann S. The Beijing genotype is emerging among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from Germany. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8:1107–13.

274.Jeon CY, Kang H, Kim M, Murray MB, Kim H, Cho EH, and Park YK. Clustering of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from foreign-born patients in Korea. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60:1835–40.

275.Gavin P et al. Multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain from Equatorial Guinea detected in Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1858–60.

276.Farnia P et al. The recent-transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains among Iranian and Afghan relapse cases: A DNAfingerprinting using RFLP and spoligotyping. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:109.

277.Stoffels K, Allix-Beguec C, Groenen G, Wanlin M, Berkvens D, Mathys V, Supply P, and Fauville-Dufaux M. From multidrugto

extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: Upward trends as seen from a 15-year nationwide study. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e63128.

278.Mor Z, Goldblatt D, Kaidar-Shwartz H, Cedar N, Rorman E, and Chemtob D. Drug-resistant tuberculosis in Israel: Risk factors and treatment outcomes. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18:1195–201.

279.Cain KP, Marano N, Kamene M, Sitienei J, Mukherjee S, Galev A, Burton J, Nasibov O, Kioko J, and De Cock KM. The movement of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis across borders in East Africa needs a regional and global solution. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001791.

280.Moniruzzaman A, Elwood RK, Schulzer M, and FitzGerald JM. Impact of country of origin on drug-resistant tuberculosis among foreign-born persons in British Columbia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10:844–50.

281.Allix-Beguec C, Fauville-Dufaux M, and Supply P. Three-year population-based evaluation of standardized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable-number tandem-repeat typing of

Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1398–406.

282.Mlambo CK, Warren RM, Poswa X, Victor TC, Duse AG, and Marais E. Genotypic diversity of extensively drug-resistant

tuberculosis (XDR-TB) in South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:99–104.

283. Gavin P, Iglesias MJ, Jimenez MS, Rodriguez-Valin E, Ibarz D, Lezcano MA, Revillo MJ, Martin C, Samper S, and Spanish Working Group on M-T. Long-term molecular surveillance of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Spain. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:701–10.

284.Svensson EM, Dooley KE, and Karlsson MO. Impact of lopina- vir-ritonavir or nevirapine on bedaquiline exposures and potential implications for patients with tuberculosis-HIV coinfection.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:6406–12.

285.Senneville E, Legout L, Valette M, Yazdanpanah Y, Beltrand E, Caillaux M, Migaud H, and Mouton Y. Effectiveness and tolerability of prolonged linezolid treatment for chronic osteomyelitis: A retrospective study. Clin Ther. 2006;28:1155–63.

286.Gerson SL, Kaplan SL, Bruss JB, Le V, Arellano FM, Hafkin B, and Kuter DJ. Hematologic effects of linezolid: Summary of clinical experience. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46:2723–6.

287.Xavier AS, and Lakshmanan M. Delamanid: A new armor in combating drug-resistant tuberculosis. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2014;5:222–4.

288.WHO. WHO Updated References on Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: Guidelines for the Programmatic Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis—2011 update. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.

289.Lange C et al. Management of Patients with Multidrug-resistant/ Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Europe: A TBNET Consensus Statement. ERS Publications, 2014.

290.Sotgiu G et al. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of linezolid containing regimens in treating MDR-TB and XDR-TB: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:1430–42.

291.Chang KC, Yew WW, Tam CM, and Leung CC. WHO group 5 drugs and difficult multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A systematic review with cohort analysis and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:4097–104.

292.World Health Organization. WHO Treatment Guidelines for DrugResistant Tuberculosis, 2016 update. WHO/HTM/TB/201604, 2016.

293.WHO. The Use of Bedaquiline in the Treatment of MultidrugResistant Tuberculosis: Interim Policy Guidance. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2013.

294.WHO. The Use of Delaminid in the Treatment of MutlidrugResistant Tuberculosis: Interim Policy Guidance. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2014.

326  Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

295.Garcia-Prats AJ, Rose PC, Draper HR, Seddon JA, Norman J, McIlleron HM, Hesseling AC, and Schaaf HS. Effect of coadministration of lidocaine on the pain and pharmacokinetics of intramuscular amikacin in children with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A randomized crossover trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018;37:1199–203.

296.Muller B, Borrell S, Rose G, and Gagneux S. The heterogeneous evolution of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Trends Genet. 2013;29:160–9.

297.Taneja R, Garcia-Prats AJ, Furin J, and Maheshwari HK. Paediatric formulations of second-line anti-tuberculosis medications: Challenges and considerations. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19(Suppl 1):61–8.

298.Esmail A, Sabur NF, Okpechi I, and Dheda K. Management of drug-resistant tuberculosis in special sub-populations including those with HIV co-infection, pregnancy, diabetes, organ-specific dysfunction, and in the critically ill. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:3102–18.

299.Worley MV, and Estrada SJ. Bedaquiline: A novel antitubercular agent for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34:1187–97.

300.Zhang C et al. The interaction of CD4 T-cell count and nevirapine hepatotoxicity in China: A change in national treatment guidelines may be warranted. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2013;62:540–5.

301.De Lazzari E et al. Hepatotoxicity of nevirapine in virologically suppressed patients according to gender and CD4 cell counts. HIV Med 2008;9:221–6.

302.Fortun J, Martin-Davila P, Navas E, Perez-Elias MJ, Cobo J, Tato M, De la Pedrosa EG, Gomez-Mampaso E, and Moreno S. Linezolid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56:180–5.

303.Anger HA, Dworkin F, Sharma S, Munsiff SS, Nilsen DM, and Ahuja SD. Linezolid use for treatment of multidrug-resistant and

extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, New York City, 2000–06. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:775–83.

304.Koh WJ, Kang YR, Jeon K, Kwon OJ, Lyu J, Kim WS, and Shim TS. Daily 300 mg dose of linezolid for multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: Updated analysis of 51 patients.

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:1503–7.

305.Mehrzad R, and Barza M. Weighing the adverse cardiac effects of fluoroquinolones: A risk perspective. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;55.

306.Stancampiano FF et al. Rare incidence of ventricular Tachycardia and Torsades de pointes in hospitalized patients with prolonged QT who later received levofloxacin: A retrospective study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:606–12.

307.Im JH, Baek JH, Kwon HY, and Lee JS. Incidence and risk factors of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;31:47–52.

308.Roongruangpitayakul C, and Chuchottaworn C. Outcomes of MDR/XDR-TB patients treated with linezolid: Experience in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2013;96:1273–82.

309.WHO. The Role of Surgery in the Treatment of Pulmonary TB and Multidrugand Extensively Drug-Resistant TB. Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 2014.

310.Chen RY 3rd et al.. PET/CT imaging correlates with treatment outcome in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:265ra166.

311.Vorster M, Sathekge MM, and Bomanji J. Advances in imaging of tuberculosis: The role of (1)(8)F-FDG PET and PET/CT. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2014;20:287–93.

312.Diagnosis of Tuberculosis. Part 32: Detection of Mycobacteria by Microscopic Methods. Berlin, Germany: Medical Microbiology: German Institute for Standardisation (Deutsches Institut für Normung), Beuth Verlag, 1995.

Книга в списке рекомендаций к покупке и прочтению сайта https://meduniver.com/

17

The Surgical Management of Tuberculosis and Its

Complications

RICHARD S. STEYN

Introduction

Diagnosis

Management

References

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary tuberculosis led to the birth of thoracic surgery. The techniques of pulmonary resection in use today were developed to deal with the persisting problem of tuberculosis (TB) in the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s. In addition, collapse therapy led to the development of thoracoplasty, still of value in rare circumstances today,1 now refined by the development of video-assisted technology. Plombage has evolved into techniques of space reduction, such as myoplasty and omentoplasty. As the incidence of TB declined in developed countries, these techniques were left as a valuable legacy and were available to deal with the next epidemic—lung cancer and the chronic infective complications that resulted from this surgery.

Today, however, the management of TB and its sequelae is benefiting from the subsequent development of techniques such as mediastinoscopy, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and myoplasty. This cross-pollination has provided the modern thoracic surgeon with a broad range of procedures to deal with the continued threat of TB in Western countries, the rising incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms and the continued epidemic of TB in underdeveloped countries. The thoracic surgeon still has an important role, supporting the respiratory physician, in the diagnosis and management of difficult cases.

DIAGNOSIS

The sputum-negative patient may present with mediastinal lymphadenopathy, a pleural effusion or a pulmonary nodule, requiring biopsy to exclude other conditions, especially sarcoidosis, carcinoma and lymphoma, and to obtain tissue for culture and sensitivity. Although the chest radiograph may clearly demonstrate lymphadenopathy, a computed tomographic (CT) scan

327

327

330

341

will often be requested to confirm that lymph nodes within reach of biopsy techniques are enlarged, to help in the choice of the appropriate technique (Figure 17.1), to identify any pulmonary focus and to clarify the relationship of vital structures that present a hazard at surgery. The surgeon has several biopsy techniques from which to choose the one that will most reliably establish the diagnosis, and if more than one is possible will choose on the basis of familiarity, the equipment available and cosmetic considerations (Figure 17.2).

Cervical mediastinoscopy

Cervical mediastinoscopy is undertaken under general anesthesia using a 2–3 cm incision midway between the suprasternal notch and the thyroid cartilage. Although a safe and relatively minor procedure, considerable experience is needed to avoid damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerves and major blood vessels in this crowded anatomical region.2 The development of video-assisted mediastinoscopy has been of considerable benefit in training surgeons to navigate safely through this region.3 The view of the surgeon is enhanced, the assistant can take part in the procedure and each case is a teaching experience (Figure 17.3).

Mediastinoscopy allows access to, and biopsy from, the nodes in the superior mediastinum that lie on either side of the trachea, in the pretracheal position and at the main carina (Figure 17.4). Nodes in the upper pole of the right hilum may be reached, but caution is necessary to avoid damage to the azygos vein and the branch of the pulmonary artery to the upper lobe.

Biopsy material, as in all these techniques, will be sent for culture in addition to histological examination, and because sarcoidosis is an ever-present possibility, biopsies should be taken from several nodal stations to avoid the pitfall of detecting only the granulomatous response in a lymph node adjacent to malignancy. Increasingly mediastinoscopy is undertaken as a day case.4

327

328  The Surgical Management of Tuberculosis and Its Complications

(a)

 

(b)

(c)

 

(d)

Figure 17.1  Although postero-anterior chest x-rays can show that there is a mediastinal abnormality, a CT scan is necessary to show the precise site and route for biopsy. The chest film in (a) shows mediastinal widening in a patient with lung cancer, similar in appearance to the mediastinum in (b) of a patient subsequently shown to have a thymoma. The CT films in (c) and (d) clearly show that the abnormality in (a) would be accessible to cervical mediastinoscopy, while that in (b) could not be reached by this route and requires right anterior mediastinotomy.

Figure 17.2  The incisions used to explore the mediastinum surgically. The patient’s chin is to the left, the clavicles are visible, as is the right nipple. The upper incision at the root of the neck provides access for cervical mediastinoscopy, the longer incision on the left chest wall is for anterior mediastinotomy. The cosmetic result of the former is very satisfactory as the scar is in the skin crease. The latter results in a visible scar that is less satisfactory.

Anterior mediastinotomy

Anterior mediastinotomy is undertaken under general anesthesia utilizing a 3–5 cm incision through the intercostal interspace over the area to be biopsied,2 most commonly the second intercostal space on the left or right (Figure 17.2). Resection of the costal cartilage is unnecessary and results in an ugly sulcus beneath the scar

Figure 17.3  A patient undergoing cervical video mediastinoscopy. The instrument is inserted beneath the pretracheal fascia, and dissection proceeds to the main carina. The surgeon and assistant view the field on the monitor allowing both to participate in the operation. The view is magnified and structures are more clearly seen than with conventional mediastinoscopy.

Книга в списке рекомендаций к покупке и прочтению сайта https://meduniver.com/

Diagnosis  329

Figure 17.4  A nodal chart used to describe node positions. Those nodes in stations 1–4 in the paratracheal areas, stations 1 and 3 in the pretracheal area and station 7 at the main carina are accessible to cervical mediastinoscopy. Stations 5 and 6 lying beneath the aortic arch and over the ascending aorta are only accessible by anterior mediastinotomy.

that is prone to hematoma and infection. In any event, the scar is cosmetically less acceptable, particularly for younger women and those who are heavy breasted. This approach provides safe access to nodes in the anterior mediastinum and those outside the aortic arch (Figure 17.4).

Digital examination through the interspace will identify a safe target that can be incised to provide a large biopsy. The procedure can be enhanced by using the video mediastinoscope (as used for cervical mediastinoscopy). The use of the diathermy should be reserved for hemostasis after a representative biopsy has been secured; one should avoid the temptation to biopsy vascular nodes using the diathermy ventilation, and this is mandatory if more complex procedures are contemplated involving several access

(a)

ports. Although VATS can be used to access mediastinal lymph nodes that lie in a suitable location, these are usually accessible with greater ease and less equipment using one of the previous techniques. VATS is of value when biopsy of the pleura (Figure 17.5) or lung is needed.

Thoracotomy and pulmonary resection

Thoracotomy and pulmonary resection will on occasions prove the only technique that will allow a firm diagnosis and exclude covert malignancy.6 VATS surgery is becoming the preferred approach for excision of lung lesions less that 3 cm in size (although increasingly some units are utilizing a VATS approach for even larger lesions). Where the lung abnormalities are larger or confluent or dense adhesions are present, thoracotomy may be necessary to fully explore the chest (Figure 17.6). The surgeon will wish to avoid taking biopsies from the periphery of such consolidated areas because this may miss an underlying neoplasm, and the procedure must ensure for the patient a full and reliable assessment.

Progressive dissection, with frequent frozen-section biopsies, is necessary to encircle the abnormality. Often during such a dissection, the true pathology becomes apparent because this will result in material of little value to the histopathologist. The pleura is often entered when undertaking biopsy through the right side, but this is of little consequence if the breach is recognized and air evacuated before closing the wound using a temporary drain through the incision. A post-operative chest radiograph is mandatory. Most patients will wish to stay overnight before discharge.

Endobronchial ultrasound and biopsy

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of mediastinal nodes offers a less invasive alternative for sampling of the mediastinal nodes (http://guidance. nice.org. uk/IPG254). The procedure is being widely adopted by respiratory physicians and is reducing the practice of mediastinoscopy.5 This procedure is very similar to flexible bronchoscopy and can be undertaken with conscious sedation or under general anesthesia.

(b)

Figure 17.5  (a) The chest x-ray of a patient presenting with a right pleural effusion. The underlying pleural nodules (arrowed) are easier to see on (b) a second radiograph taken after aspiration had resulted in an inadvertent pneumothorax. Biopsy by video-assisted thoracoscopy showed the presence of necrotizing granulomata and acid-fast bacilli.