- •Preface
- •Biological Vision Systems
- •Visual Representations from Paintings to Photographs
- •Computer Vision
- •The Limitations of Standard 2D Images
- •3D Imaging, Analysis and Applications
- •Book Objective and Content
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •2.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •2.2 An Overview of Passive 3D Imaging Systems
- •2.2.1 Multiple View Approaches
- •2.2.2 Single View Approaches
- •2.3 Camera Modeling
- •2.3.1 Homogeneous Coordinates
- •2.3.2 Perspective Projection Camera Model
- •2.3.2.1 Camera Modeling: The Coordinate Transformation
- •2.3.2.2 Camera Modeling: Perspective Projection
- •2.3.2.3 Camera Modeling: Image Sampling
- •2.3.2.4 Camera Modeling: Concatenating the Projective Mappings
- •2.3.3 Radial Distortion
- •2.4 Camera Calibration
- •2.4.1 Estimation of a Scene-to-Image Planar Homography
- •2.4.2 Basic Calibration
- •2.4.3 Refined Calibration
- •2.4.4 Calibration of a Stereo Rig
- •2.5 Two-View Geometry
- •2.5.1 Epipolar Geometry
- •2.5.2 Essential and Fundamental Matrices
- •2.5.3 The Fundamental Matrix for Pure Translation
- •2.5.4 Computation of the Fundamental Matrix
- •2.5.5 Two Views Separated by a Pure Rotation
- •2.5.6 Two Views of a Planar Scene
- •2.6 Rectification
- •2.6.1 Rectification with Calibration Information
- •2.6.2 Rectification Without Calibration Information
- •2.7 Finding Correspondences
- •2.7.1 Correlation-Based Methods
- •2.7.2 Feature-Based Methods
- •2.8 3D Reconstruction
- •2.8.1 Stereo
- •2.8.1.1 Dense Stereo Matching
- •2.8.1.2 Triangulation
- •2.8.2 Structure from Motion
- •2.9 Passive Multiple-View 3D Imaging Systems
- •2.9.1 Stereo Cameras
- •2.9.2 3D Modeling
- •2.9.3 Mobile Robot Localization and Mapping
- •2.10 Passive Versus Active 3D Imaging Systems
- •2.11 Concluding Remarks
- •2.12 Further Reading
- •2.13 Questions
- •2.14 Exercises
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.1.1 Historical Context
- •3.1.2 Basic Measurement Principles
- •3.1.3 Active Triangulation-Based Methods
- •3.1.4 Chapter Outline
- •3.2 Spot Scanners
- •3.2.1 Spot Position Detection
- •3.3 Stripe Scanners
- •3.3.1 Camera Model
- •3.3.2 Sheet-of-Light Projector Model
- •3.3.3 Triangulation for Stripe Scanners
- •3.4 Area-Based Structured Light Systems
- •3.4.1 Gray Code Methods
- •3.4.1.1 Decoding of Binary Fringe-Based Codes
- •3.4.1.2 Advantage of the Gray Code
- •3.4.2 Phase Shift Methods
- •3.4.2.1 Removing the Phase Ambiguity
- •3.4.3 Triangulation for a Structured Light System
- •3.5 System Calibration
- •3.6 Measurement Uncertainty
- •3.6.1 Uncertainty Related to the Phase Shift Algorithm
- •3.6.2 Uncertainty Related to Intrinsic Parameters
- •3.6.3 Uncertainty Related to Extrinsic Parameters
- •3.6.4 Uncertainty as a Design Tool
- •3.7 Experimental Characterization of 3D Imaging Systems
- •3.7.1 Low-Level Characterization
- •3.7.2 System-Level Characterization
- •3.7.3 Characterization of Errors Caused by Surface Properties
- •3.7.4 Application-Based Characterization
- •3.8 Selected Advanced Topics
- •3.8.1 Thin Lens Equation
- •3.8.2 Depth of Field
- •3.8.3 Scheimpflug Condition
- •3.8.4 Speckle and Uncertainty
- •3.8.5 Laser Depth of Field
- •3.8.6 Lateral Resolution
- •3.9 Research Challenges
- •3.10 Concluding Remarks
- •3.11 Further Reading
- •3.12 Questions
- •3.13 Exercises
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •4.2 Representation of 3D Data
- •4.2.1 Raw Data
- •4.2.1.1 Point Cloud
- •4.2.1.2 Structured Point Cloud
- •4.2.1.3 Depth Maps and Range Images
- •4.2.1.4 Needle map
- •4.2.1.5 Polygon Soup
- •4.2.2 Surface Representations
- •4.2.2.1 Triangular Mesh
- •4.2.2.2 Quadrilateral Mesh
- •4.2.2.3 Subdivision Surfaces
- •4.2.2.4 Morphable Model
- •4.2.2.5 Implicit Surface
- •4.2.2.6 Parametric Surface
- •4.2.2.7 Comparison of Surface Representations
- •4.2.3 Solid-Based Representations
- •4.2.3.1 Voxels
- •4.2.3.3 Binary Space Partitioning
- •4.2.3.4 Constructive Solid Geometry
- •4.2.3.5 Boundary Representations
- •4.2.4 Summary of Solid-Based Representations
- •4.3 Polygon Meshes
- •4.3.1 Mesh Storage
- •4.3.2 Mesh Data Structures
- •4.3.2.1 Halfedge Structure
- •4.4 Subdivision Surfaces
- •4.4.1 Doo-Sabin Scheme
- •4.4.2 Catmull-Clark Scheme
- •4.4.3 Loop Scheme
- •4.5 Local Differential Properties
- •4.5.1 Surface Normals
- •4.5.2 Differential Coordinates and the Mesh Laplacian
- •4.6 Compression and Levels of Detail
- •4.6.1 Mesh Simplification
- •4.6.1.1 Edge Collapse
- •4.6.1.2 Quadric Error Metric
- •4.6.2 QEM Simplification Summary
- •4.6.3 Surface Simplification Results
- •4.7 Visualization
- •4.8 Research Challenges
- •4.9 Concluding Remarks
- •4.10 Further Reading
- •4.11 Questions
- •4.12 Exercises
- •References
- •1.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •1.2 A Historical Perspective on 3D Imaging
- •1.2.1 Image Formation and Image Capture
- •1.2.2 Binocular Perception of Depth
- •1.2.3 Stereoscopic Displays
- •1.3 The Development of Computer Vision
- •1.3.1 Further Reading in Computer Vision
- •1.4 Acquisition Techniques for 3D Imaging
- •1.4.1 Passive 3D Imaging
- •1.4.2 Active 3D Imaging
- •1.4.3 Passive Stereo Versus Active Stereo Imaging
- •1.5 Twelve Milestones in 3D Imaging and Shape Analysis
- •1.5.1 Active 3D Imaging: An Early Optical Triangulation System
- •1.5.2 Passive 3D Imaging: An Early Stereo System
- •1.5.3 Passive 3D Imaging: The Essential Matrix
- •1.5.4 Model Fitting: The RANSAC Approach to Feature Correspondence Analysis
- •1.5.5 Active 3D Imaging: Advances in Scanning Geometries
- •1.5.6 3D Registration: Rigid Transformation Estimation from 3D Correspondences
- •1.5.7 3D Registration: Iterative Closest Points
- •1.5.9 3D Local Shape Descriptors: Spin Images
- •1.5.10 Passive 3D Imaging: Flexible Camera Calibration
- •1.5.11 3D Shape Matching: Heat Kernel Signatures
- •1.6 Applications of 3D Imaging
- •1.7 Book Outline
- •1.7.1 Part I: 3D Imaging and Shape Representation
- •1.7.2 Part II: 3D Shape Analysis and Processing
- •1.7.3 Part III: 3D Imaging Applications
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.1.1 Applications
- •5.1.2 Chapter Outline
- •5.2 Mathematical Background
- •5.2.1 Differential Geometry
- •5.2.2 Curvature of Two-Dimensional Surfaces
- •5.2.3 Discrete Differential Geometry
- •5.2.4 Diffusion Geometry
- •5.2.5 Discrete Diffusion Geometry
- •5.3 Feature Detectors
- •5.3.1 A Taxonomy
- •5.3.2 Harris 3D
- •5.3.3 Mesh DOG
- •5.3.4 Salient Features
- •5.3.5 Heat Kernel Features
- •5.3.6 Topological Features
- •5.3.7 Maximally Stable Components
- •5.3.8 Benchmarks
- •5.4 Feature Descriptors
- •5.4.1 A Taxonomy
- •5.4.2 Curvature-Based Descriptors (HK and SC)
- •5.4.3 Spin Images
- •5.4.4 Shape Context
- •5.4.5 Integral Volume Descriptor
- •5.4.6 Mesh Histogram of Gradients (HOG)
- •5.4.7 Heat Kernel Signature (HKS)
- •5.4.8 Scale-Invariant Heat Kernel Signature (SI-HKS)
- •5.4.9 Color Heat Kernel Signature (CHKS)
- •5.4.10 Volumetric Heat Kernel Signature (VHKS)
- •5.5 Research Challenges
- •5.6 Conclusions
- •5.7 Further Reading
- •5.8 Questions
- •5.9 Exercises
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •6.2 Registration of Two Views
- •6.2.1 Problem Statement
- •6.2.2 The Iterative Closest Points (ICP) Algorithm
- •6.2.3 ICP Extensions
- •6.2.3.1 Techniques for Pre-alignment
- •Global Approaches
- •Local Approaches
- •6.2.3.2 Techniques for Improving Speed
- •Subsampling
- •Closest Point Computation
- •Distance Formulation
- •6.2.3.3 Techniques for Improving Accuracy
- •Outlier Rejection
- •Additional Information
- •Probabilistic Methods
- •6.3 Advanced Techniques
- •6.3.1 Registration of More than Two Views
- •Reducing Error Accumulation
- •Automating Registration
- •6.3.2 Registration in Cluttered Scenes
- •Point Signatures
- •Matching Methods
- •6.3.3 Deformable Registration
- •Methods Based on General Optimization Techniques
- •Probabilistic Methods
- •6.3.4 Machine Learning Techniques
- •Improving the Matching
- •Object Detection
- •6.4 Quantitative Performance Evaluation
- •6.5 Case Study 1: Pairwise Alignment with Outlier Rejection
- •6.6 Case Study 2: ICP with Levenberg-Marquardt
- •6.6.1 The LM-ICP Method
- •6.6.2 Computing the Derivatives
- •6.6.3 The Case of Quaternions
- •6.6.4 Summary of the LM-ICP Algorithm
- •6.6.5 Results and Discussion
- •6.7 Case Study 3: Deformable ICP with Levenberg-Marquardt
- •6.7.1 Surface Representation
- •6.7.2 Cost Function
- •Data Term: Global Surface Attraction
- •Data Term: Boundary Attraction
- •Penalty Term: Spatial Smoothness
- •Penalty Term: Temporal Smoothness
- •6.7.3 Minimization Procedure
- •6.7.4 Summary of the Algorithm
- •6.7.5 Experiments
- •6.8 Research Challenges
- •6.9 Concluding Remarks
- •6.10 Further Reading
- •6.11 Questions
- •6.12 Exercises
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 Retrieval and Recognition Evaluation
- •7.1.2 Chapter Outline
- •7.2 Literature Review
- •7.3 3D Shape Retrieval Techniques
- •7.3.1 Depth-Buffer Descriptor
- •7.3.1.1 Computing the 2D Projections
- •7.3.1.2 Obtaining the Feature Vector
- •7.3.1.3 Evaluation
- •7.3.1.4 Complexity Analysis
- •7.3.2 Spin Images for Object Recognition
- •7.3.2.1 Matching
- •7.3.2.2 Evaluation
- •7.3.2.3 Complexity Analysis
- •7.3.3 Salient Spectral Geometric Features
- •7.3.3.1 Feature Points Detection
- •7.3.3.2 Local Descriptors
- •7.3.3.3 Shape Matching
- •7.3.3.4 Evaluation
- •7.3.3.5 Complexity Analysis
- •7.3.4 Heat Kernel Signatures
- •7.3.4.1 Evaluation
- •7.3.4.2 Complexity Analysis
- •7.4 Research Challenges
- •7.5 Concluding Remarks
- •7.6 Further Reading
- •7.7 Questions
- •7.8 Exercises
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •8.2 3D Face Scan Representation and Visualization
- •8.3 3D Face Datasets
- •8.3.1 FRGC v2 3D Face Dataset
- •8.3.2 The Bosphorus Dataset
- •8.4 3D Face Recognition Evaluation
- •8.4.1 Face Verification
- •8.4.2 Face Identification
- •8.5 Processing Stages in 3D Face Recognition
- •8.5.1 Face Detection and Segmentation
- •8.5.2 Removal of Spikes
- •8.5.3 Filling of Holes and Missing Data
- •8.5.4 Removal of Noise
- •8.5.5 Fiducial Point Localization and Pose Correction
- •8.5.6 Spatial Resampling
- •8.5.7 Feature Extraction on Facial Surfaces
- •8.5.8 Classifiers for 3D Face Matching
- •8.6 ICP-Based 3D Face Recognition
- •8.6.1 ICP Outline
- •8.6.2 A Critical Discussion of ICP
- •8.6.3 A Typical ICP-Based 3D Face Recognition Implementation
- •8.6.4 ICP Variants and Other Surface Registration Approaches
- •8.7 PCA-Based 3D Face Recognition
- •8.7.1 PCA System Training
- •8.7.2 PCA Training Using Singular Value Decomposition
- •8.7.3 PCA Testing
- •8.7.4 PCA Performance
- •8.8 LDA-Based 3D Face Recognition
- •8.8.1 Two-Class LDA
- •8.8.2 LDA with More than Two Classes
- •8.8.3 LDA in High Dimensional 3D Face Spaces
- •8.8.4 LDA Performance
- •8.9 Normals and Curvature in 3D Face Recognition
- •8.9.1 Computing Curvature on a 3D Face Scan
- •8.10 Recent Techniques in 3D Face Recognition
- •8.10.1 3D Face Recognition Using Annotated Face Models (AFM)
- •8.10.2 Local Feature-Based 3D Face Recognition
- •8.10.2.1 Keypoint Detection and Local Feature Matching
- •8.10.2.2 Other Local Feature-Based Methods
- •8.10.3 Expression Modeling for Invariant 3D Face Recognition
- •8.10.3.1 Other Expression Modeling Approaches
- •8.11 Research Challenges
- •8.12 Concluding Remarks
- •8.13 Further Reading
- •8.14 Questions
- •8.15 Exercises
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •9.2 DEM Generation from Stereoscopic Imagery
- •9.2.1 Stereoscopic DEM Generation: Literature Review
- •9.2.2 Accuracy Evaluation of DEMs
- •9.2.3 An Example of DEM Generation from SPOT-5 Imagery
- •9.3 DEM Generation from InSAR
- •9.3.1 Techniques for DEM Generation from InSAR
- •9.3.1.1 Basic Principle of InSAR in Elevation Measurement
- •9.3.1.2 Processing Stages of DEM Generation from InSAR
- •The Branch-Cut Method of Phase Unwrapping
- •The Least Squares (LS) Method of Phase Unwrapping
- •9.3.2 Accuracy Analysis of DEMs Generated from InSAR
- •9.3.3 Examples of DEM Generation from InSAR
- •9.4 DEM Generation from LIDAR
- •9.4.1 LIDAR Data Acquisition
- •9.4.2 Accuracy, Error Types and Countermeasures
- •9.4.3 LIDAR Interpolation
- •9.4.4 LIDAR Filtering
- •9.4.5 DTM from Statistical Properties of the Point Cloud
- •9.5 Research Challenges
- •9.6 Concluding Remarks
- •9.7 Further Reading
- •9.8 Questions
- •9.9 Exercises
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.1.1 Allometric Modeling of Biomass
- •10.1.2 Chapter Outline
- •10.2 Aerial Photo Mensuration
- •10.2.1 Principles of Aerial Photogrammetry
- •10.2.1.1 Geometric Basis of Photogrammetric Measurement
- •10.2.1.2 Ground Control and Direct Georeferencing
- •10.2.2 Tree Height Measurement Using Forest Photogrammetry
- •10.2.2.2 Automated Methods in Forest Photogrammetry
- •10.3 Airborne Laser Scanning
- •10.3.1 Principles of Airborne Laser Scanning
- •10.3.1.1 Lidar-Based Measurement of Terrain and Canopy Surfaces
- •10.3.2 Individual Tree-Level Measurement Using Lidar
- •10.3.2.1 Automated Individual Tree Measurement Using Lidar
- •10.3.3 Area-Based Approach to Estimating Biomass with Lidar
- •10.4 Future Developments
- •10.5 Concluding Remarks
- •10.6 Further Reading
- •10.7 Questions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •11.2 Volumetric Data Acquisition
- •11.2.1 Computed Tomography
- •11.2.1.1 Characteristics of 3D CT Data
- •11.2.2 Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
- •11.2.2.1 Characteristics of 3D PET Data
- •Relaxation
- •11.2.3.1 Characteristics of the 3D MRI Data
- •Image Quality and Artifacts
- •11.2.4 Summary
- •11.3 Surface Extraction and Volumetric Visualization
- •11.3.1 Surface Extraction
- •Example: Curvatures and Geometric Tools
- •11.3.2 Volume Rendering
- •11.3.3 Summary
- •11.4 Volumetric Image Registration
- •11.4.1 A Hierarchy of Transformations
- •11.4.1.1 Rigid Body Transformation
- •11.4.1.2 Similarity Transformations and Anisotropic Scaling
- •11.4.1.3 Affine Transformations
- •11.4.1.4 Perspective Transformations
- •11.4.1.5 Non-rigid Transformations
- •11.4.2 Points and Features Used for the Registration
- •11.4.2.1 Landmark Features
- •11.4.2.2 Surface-Based Registration
- •11.4.2.3 Intensity-Based Registration
- •11.4.3 Registration Optimization
- •11.4.3.1 Estimation of Registration Errors
- •11.4.4 Summary
- •11.5 Segmentation
- •11.5.1 Semi-automatic Methods
- •11.5.1.1 Thresholding
- •11.5.1.2 Region Growing
- •11.5.1.3 Deformable Models
- •Snakes
- •Balloons
- •11.5.2 Fully Automatic Methods
- •11.5.2.1 Atlas-Based Segmentation
- •11.5.2.2 Statistical Shape Modeling and Analysis
- •11.5.3 Summary
- •11.6 Diffusion Imaging: An Illustration of a Full Pipeline
- •11.6.1 From Scalar Images to Tensors
- •11.6.2 From Tensor Image to Information
- •11.6.3 Summary
- •11.7 Applications
- •11.7.1 Diagnosis and Morphometry
- •11.7.2 Simulation and Training
- •11.7.3 Surgical Planning and Guidance
- •11.7.4 Summary
- •11.8 Concluding Remarks
- •11.9 Research Challenges
- •11.10 Further Reading
- •Data Acquisition
- •Surface Extraction
- •Volume Registration
- •Segmentation
- •Diffusion Imaging
- •Software
- •11.11 Questions
- •11.12 Exercises
- •References
- •Index
492 |
P.G. Batchelor et al. |
References
1.Bailey, D., Townsend, D., Valk, P., Maisey, M.N. (eds.): Positron Emission Tomography. Springer, Berlin (2005)
2.Baillard, C., Hellier, P., Barillot, C.: Segmentation of brain 3D MR images using level sets and dense registration. Med. Image Anal. 5, 185–194 (2001)
3.Barret, H.H., Myers, K.J.: Foundations of Image Science. Pure and Applied Optics. Wiley,
New York (2004)
4. Barrett, J.F., Keat, N.: Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiograph., Rev. Publ. Radiol. Soc. N. Am. 24(6), 1679–1691 (2004). doi:10.1148/rg.246045065. http://radiographics.rsna.org/content/24/6/1679.full
5.Batchelor, P., Castellano Smith, A., Hill, D., Hawkes, D., Cox, T., Dean, A.: Measures of folding applied to the development of the human fetal brain. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21(8), 953–965 (2002)
6. Batchelor, P.G., Calamante, F., Tournier, D., Atkinson, D., Hill, D.L.G., Connelly, A.: Quantification of the shape of fiber tracts. Methods 903(2005), 894–903 (2006). doi:10.1002/mrm.20858
7.Batchelor, P.G., Calamante, F., Tournier, J., Atkinson, D., Hill, D.L.G., Connelly, A.: Quantification of the shape of fiber tracts. Magn. Reson. Med. 55, 894–903 (2006)
8.de Berg, M., Cheong, O., van Kreveld, M., Overmars, M. (eds.): Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2008)
9.Bertero, M., Boccacci, P.: Introduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol (1998)
10.Besl, P.J., McKay, N.D.: A method for registration of 3-d shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14(2), 239–256 (1992)
11.Birkfellner, W.: Applied Medical Image Processing: A Basic Course. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)
12.Boissonnat, J.D., Yvinec, M.: Algorithmic Geometry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
13.Bookstein, F.L.: Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 11, 567–585 (1989)
14.de Bruijne, M., van Ginneken, B., Viergever, M.A., Niessen, W.J.: Adapting active shape models for 3D segmentation of tubular structures in medical images. In: Proceedings IPMI (2003)
15.de Bruijne, M., van Ginneken, B., Viergever, M.A., Niessen, W.J.: Interactive segmentation of abdominal aortic aneurysms in CTA images. Med. Image Anal. 8, 127–138 (2004)
16.Bushberg, J.T.: The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore (2002)
17.Carmichael, O.T., Aizenstein, H.A., Davis, S.W., Becker, J.T., Thompson, P.M., Meltzer, C.C., Liu, Y.: Atlas-based hippocampus segmentation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage 27, 979–990 (2005)
18.Ciofolo, C., Barillot, C.: Atlas-based segmentation of 3d cerebral structures with competitive level sets and fuzzy control. Med. Image Anal. 13, 456–470 (2010)
19.Cohen, L.D.: On active contour models and balloon. CVGIP, Image Underst. 53, 211–218 (1991)
20.Cootes, T., Twining, C., Babalola, K., Taylor, C.: Diffeomorphic statistical shape models. Image Vis. Comput. 26(3), 326–332 (2008)
21.Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J., Cooper, D.H., Graham, J.: Active shape models—their training and application. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 61, 38–59 (1995)
22.Cuadra, M.B., Pollo, C., Bardera, A., Cuisenaire, O., Villemure, J.G., Thiran, J.P.: Atlas-based segmentation of pathological MR brain images using a model of lesion growth. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23, 1301–1314 (2004)
23.Dempster, A., Laird, N., Rubin, D.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. 39, 1–38 (1977)
11 3D Medical Imaging |
493 |
24.Ecabert, O., Peters, J., Schramm, H., Lorenz, C., von Berg, J., Walker, M.J., Vembar, M., Olszewski, M.E., Subramanyan, K., Lavi, G., Weese, J.: Automatic model-based segmentation of the heart in CT images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 27, 1189–1201 (2008)
25.Edelsbrunner, H.: Geometry and Topology for Mesh Generation. Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
26.Epstein, C.L.: Introduction to the Mathematics of Medical Imaging, 2nd edn. SIAM, Philadelphia (2003)
27.Erasmus, L.J., Hurter, D., Naudé, M., Kritzinger, H.G., Acho, S.: A short overview of MRI artefacts. SA J. Radiol. 8(2), 13–17 (2004)
28.Fitzpatrick, M.J., West, J.B., Maurer, C.R. Jr.: Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17(5), 694–702 (1998)
29.Fripp, J., Crozier, S., Warfield, S., Ourselin, S.: Automatic segmentation of the knee bones using 3D active shape models. In: Proceedings ICPR (2006)
30.Gardner, R.J.: In: Geometric Tomography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
31.Hajnal, J.V. (ed.): Medical Image Registration. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2001)
32.Hall, P., Ngan, M., Andreae, P.: Reconstruction of vascular networks using three-dimensional models. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16(6), 919–929 (1997)
33.Han, X., Xu, C., Prince, J.L.: A topology preserving level set method for geometric deformable models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 25(6), 755–768 (2003)
34.Heimann, T., Meinzer, H.P.: Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: a review. Med. Image Anal. 13, 543–563 (2009)
35.Hill, D.L.G., Batchelor, P.G., Holden, M., Hawkes, D.J.: Medical image registration. Phys. Med. Biol. 46, R1–R45 (2001)
36.Hudson, H.M., Larkin, R.S.: Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 13, 601–609 (1994)
37. Imai, K., Ikeda, M., Wada, S., Enchi, Y., Niimi, T.: Analysis of streak artefacts on CT images using statistics of extremes. Br. J. Radiol. 80(959), 911–918 (2007). http://bjr.birjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/80/959/911. doi:10.1259/bjr/93741044
38.Johansen-Berg, H., Behrens, T.E. (eds.): Diffusion MRI from Quantitative Measurement to In-Vivo Neuroanatomy. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2009)
39.Kak, A.C., Slaney, M.: Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging. SIAM, Philadelphia (2001). Unabridged edn.
40.Kass, M., Witkin, A., Terzopoulos, D.: Snakes—active contour models. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1(4), 321–331 (1987)
41.Klein, S., van der Heide, U.A., Lips, I.M., van Vulpen, M., Staring, M., Pluim, J.P.: Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information. Med. Phys. 35, 1407–1417 (2008)
42.Kucera, D., Martin, R.W.: Segmentation of sequences of echocardiographic images using a simplified 3D active contour model with region-based external forces. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 21, 1–21 (1997)
43.Lerotic, M., Chung, A., Mylonas, G., Yang, G.Z.: Pq-space based non-photorealistic rendering for augmented reality. In: Ayache, N., Ourselin, S., Maeder, A. (eds.) MICCAI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4792, pp. 102–109. Springer, Berlin (2007)
44.Liang, Z.P., Lauterbur, P.C.: Principles of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: a Signal Processing Perspective. Series on Biomedical Engineering. IEEE Press, New York (2000)
45.Liebling, M.: CT Reconstruction Demo Applet. Online (2001). http://bigwww.epfl.ch/demo/ jtomography/demo.html
46.Linguraru, M.G., Sandberg, J.K., Li, Z., Pura, J.A., Summers, R.M.: Atlas-based automated segmentation of spleen and liver using adaptive enhancement estimation. In: Proceedings MICCAI, pp. 1001–1008 (2009)
47.Lorensen, W.E., Cline, H.E.: Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface reconstruction algorithm. Comput. Graph. 21(3), 163–169 (1987)
48.Lorenz, C., von Berg, J.: A comprehensive shape model of the heart. Med. Image Anal. 10, 657–670 (2006)
494 |
P.G. Batchelor et al. |
49.Lorenzo-Valdés, M., Sanchez-Ortiza, G.I., Elkington, A.G., Mohiaddin, R.H., Rueckert, D.: Segmentation of 4D cardiac MR images using a probabilistic atlas and the EM algorithm. Med. Image Anal. 8, 255–265 (2004)
50.Malladi, R., Sethian, J., Vemuri, B.C.: Shape modeling with front propagation: a level set approach. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 17(2), 158–175 (1995)
51.Manniesing, R., Velthuis, B.K., can Leeuwen, M.S., van der Schaaf, I.C., van Laar, P.J., Niessen, W.J.: Level set based cerebral vasculature segmentation and diameter quantification in ct angiography. Med. Image Anal. 10(2), 200–214 (2006)
52.Manzke, R., Meyer, C., Ecabert, O., Peters, J., Noordhoek, N.J., Thiagalingam, A., Reddy, V., Chan, R.C., Weese, J.: Automatic segmentation of rotational X-ray images for anatomic intra-procedural surface generation in atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29, 260–272 (2010)
53.McInerney, T., Terzopoulos, D.: Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey.
Med. Image Anal. 1(2), 91–108 (1996) |
|
||||
54. Mei, |
L., Figl, |
M., |
Darzi, A., |
Rueckert, D., |
Edwards, P.: Sample sufficiency and |
PCA |
dimension |
for |
statistical |
shape models. |
In: Proceedings of the 10th Euro- |
pean Conference on Computer Vision: Part IV, pp. 492–503. Springer, Berlin (2008). http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1478237.1478274
55.Mei, L., Figl, M., Rueckert, D., Darzi, A., Edwards, P.: Sample sufficiency and number of modes to retain in statistical shape modelling. In: Metaxas, D., Axel, L., Fichtinger, G., Szkely, G. (eds.) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention MICCAI 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5241, pp. 425–433. Springer, Berlin (2008)
56.Muralidhar, G.S., Bovik, A.C., Giese, J.D., Sampat, M.P., Whitman, G.J., Haygood, T.M., Stephens, T.W., Markey, M.K.: Snakules: a model-based active contour algorithm for the annotation of spicules on mammography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29, 1768–1780 (2010)
57.Natterer, F., Wübbeling, F.: Mathematical Methods in Image Reconstruction. Monographs on Mathematical Modeling and Computation. SIAM, Philadelphia (2001)
58.Noble, J.A., Boukerroui, D.: Ultrasound image segmentation: a survey. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25(8), 987–1010 (2006)
59.Olabarriaga, S.D., Smeulders, A.W.M.: Interaction in the segmentation of medical images: a survey. Med. Image Anal. 5(2), 127–142 (2001)
60.Paragios, N.: A level set approach for shape-driven segmentation and tracking of the left ventricle. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22(6), 773–776 (2003)
61.Pelizzari, C.A., Tan, K.K., Levin, D.N., Chen, G.T.Y., Balter, J.: Interactive 3D patient-image registration. In: Colchester, A.C.F., Hawkes, D.J. (eds.) Information Processing in Medical Imaging, pp. 133–141. Springer, Berlin (1991)
62.Peters, J., Ecabert, O., Meyer, C., Schramm, H., Kneser, R., Groth, A., Weese, J.: Automatic whole heart segmentation in static magnetic resonance image volumes. In: Proceedings MICCAI, pp. 402–410 (2007)
63.Peters, T.M., Cleary, K.R.: Image-Guided Interventions: Technology and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2008)
64.Pham, D.L., Xu, C., Prince, J.L.: A survey of current methods in medical image segmentation. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2, 315–338 (2000)
65.Pratt, P., Mayer, E., Vale, J., Cohen, D., Edwards, E., Darzi, A., Yang, G.Z.: An effective visualisation and registration system for image-guided robotic partial nephrectomy. J. Robotic Surgery (2012)
66.Rajan, J., Poot, D., Juntu, J., Sijbers, J.: Noise measurement from magnitude MRI using local estimates of variance and skewness. Phys. Med. Biol. 55(16), N441-9 (2010). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20679694. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/N02
67.Rohlfing, T., Brandt, R., Maurer, C. Jr., Menzel, R.: Bee brains, b-splines and computational democracy: generating an average shape atlas. In: Proceedings MMBIA, pp. 187–194 (2001)
68.Rohlfing, T., Brandt, R., Menzel, R., Maurer, C.R. Jr.: Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. Neuroimage 21, 1428–1442 (2004)
11 3D Medical Imaging |
495 |
69.Roth, H., McClelland, J., Modat, M., Boone, D., Hu, M., Ourselin, S., Slabaugh, G.G., Halligan, S., Hawkes, D.J.: Establishing spatial correspondence between the inner colon surfaces from prone and supine ct colonography. In: Proceedings MICCAI (Beijing), pp. 497–504 (2010)
70.Rueckert, D., Frangi, A.F., Schnabel, J.A.: Automatic construction of 3D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22, 1014–1025 (2003)
71.Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L.I., Hayes, C., Hill, D.L.G., Leach, M.O., Hawkes, D.J.: Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18(8), 712–721 (1999)
72.Rhode, K., Sermesant, M.: Modeling and registration for electrophysiology procedures based on three-dimensional imaging. Curr. Cardiovasc. Imaging Rep. 4, 116–126 (2011)
73.Shepp, L., Vardi, Y.: Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1, 113–122 (1982)
74.Slepian, D. (ed.): Key Papers in the Development of Information Theory. Reprint Series. IEEE Press, New York (1974)
75.Studholme, C., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J.: An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment. Pattern Recognit. 32(1), 71–86 (1999)
76.Suetens, P.: Fundamentals of Medical Imaging. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
77.Tabakov, S., Smith, P.H.S., Milano, F., Strand, S.E., Lewis, C. (eds.): Encyclopedia of Medical Physics. Taylor & Francis, London (2012). ISBN 9781439846520 http://www.emitel2.eu/. available [Online]
78.Tao, X., Prince, J.L., Davatzikos, C.: Using a statistical shape model to extract sulcal curves on the outer cortex of the human brain. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21, 513–524 (2002)
79.Viola, P.A., Wells, W.M.: Alignment by maximisation of mutual information. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 15–23 (1995)
80.Weickert, J., Laidlaw, D. (eds.): Visualization and Processing of Tensor Fields. II. Mathematics+Visualization. Springer, Berlin (2009)
81.Weickert, J., Hagen, H. (eds.): Visualization and Processing of Tensor Fields. Mathematics+Visualization. Springer, Berlin (2006)
82.Williams, D.J., Shah, M.: A fast algorithm for active contours and curvature estimation. CVGIP, Image Underst. 55, 14–26 (1992)
83.Xu, C., Pham, D.L., Rettmann, M.E., Yu, D.N., Prince, J.L.: Reconstruction of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18, 467–480 (1999)
84.Yushkevich, P.A., Piven, J., Hazlett, H.C., Smith, R.G., Ho, S., Gee, J.C., Gerig, G.: Userguided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31(3), 1116–1128 (2006)
85.Zhu, X.J., Zhang, P.F., Shao, J.H., Cheng, Y.Z., Zhang, Y., Bai, J.: A snake-based method for segmentation of intravascular ultrasound images and its in vivo validation. Ultrasonics 51, 181–189 (2011)
86.Zhuang, X., Rhode, K.S., Razavi, R.S., Hawkes, D.J., Ourselin, S.: A registration-based propagation framework for automatic whole heart segmentation of cardiac MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29, 1612–1625 (2010)