- •Preface
- •Biological Vision Systems
- •Visual Representations from Paintings to Photographs
- •Computer Vision
- •The Limitations of Standard 2D Images
- •3D Imaging, Analysis and Applications
- •Book Objective and Content
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •2.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •2.2 An Overview of Passive 3D Imaging Systems
- •2.2.1 Multiple View Approaches
- •2.2.2 Single View Approaches
- •2.3 Camera Modeling
- •2.3.1 Homogeneous Coordinates
- •2.3.2 Perspective Projection Camera Model
- •2.3.2.1 Camera Modeling: The Coordinate Transformation
- •2.3.2.2 Camera Modeling: Perspective Projection
- •2.3.2.3 Camera Modeling: Image Sampling
- •2.3.2.4 Camera Modeling: Concatenating the Projective Mappings
- •2.3.3 Radial Distortion
- •2.4 Camera Calibration
- •2.4.1 Estimation of a Scene-to-Image Planar Homography
- •2.4.2 Basic Calibration
- •2.4.3 Refined Calibration
- •2.4.4 Calibration of a Stereo Rig
- •2.5 Two-View Geometry
- •2.5.1 Epipolar Geometry
- •2.5.2 Essential and Fundamental Matrices
- •2.5.3 The Fundamental Matrix for Pure Translation
- •2.5.4 Computation of the Fundamental Matrix
- •2.5.5 Two Views Separated by a Pure Rotation
- •2.5.6 Two Views of a Planar Scene
- •2.6 Rectification
- •2.6.1 Rectification with Calibration Information
- •2.6.2 Rectification Without Calibration Information
- •2.7 Finding Correspondences
- •2.7.1 Correlation-Based Methods
- •2.7.2 Feature-Based Methods
- •2.8 3D Reconstruction
- •2.8.1 Stereo
- •2.8.1.1 Dense Stereo Matching
- •2.8.1.2 Triangulation
- •2.8.2 Structure from Motion
- •2.9 Passive Multiple-View 3D Imaging Systems
- •2.9.1 Stereo Cameras
- •2.9.2 3D Modeling
- •2.9.3 Mobile Robot Localization and Mapping
- •2.10 Passive Versus Active 3D Imaging Systems
- •2.11 Concluding Remarks
- •2.12 Further Reading
- •2.13 Questions
- •2.14 Exercises
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.1.1 Historical Context
- •3.1.2 Basic Measurement Principles
- •3.1.3 Active Triangulation-Based Methods
- •3.1.4 Chapter Outline
- •3.2 Spot Scanners
- •3.2.1 Spot Position Detection
- •3.3 Stripe Scanners
- •3.3.1 Camera Model
- •3.3.2 Sheet-of-Light Projector Model
- •3.3.3 Triangulation for Stripe Scanners
- •3.4 Area-Based Structured Light Systems
- •3.4.1 Gray Code Methods
- •3.4.1.1 Decoding of Binary Fringe-Based Codes
- •3.4.1.2 Advantage of the Gray Code
- •3.4.2 Phase Shift Methods
- •3.4.2.1 Removing the Phase Ambiguity
- •3.4.3 Triangulation for a Structured Light System
- •3.5 System Calibration
- •3.6 Measurement Uncertainty
- •3.6.1 Uncertainty Related to the Phase Shift Algorithm
- •3.6.2 Uncertainty Related to Intrinsic Parameters
- •3.6.3 Uncertainty Related to Extrinsic Parameters
- •3.6.4 Uncertainty as a Design Tool
- •3.7 Experimental Characterization of 3D Imaging Systems
- •3.7.1 Low-Level Characterization
- •3.7.2 System-Level Characterization
- •3.7.3 Characterization of Errors Caused by Surface Properties
- •3.7.4 Application-Based Characterization
- •3.8 Selected Advanced Topics
- •3.8.1 Thin Lens Equation
- •3.8.2 Depth of Field
- •3.8.3 Scheimpflug Condition
- •3.8.4 Speckle and Uncertainty
- •3.8.5 Laser Depth of Field
- •3.8.6 Lateral Resolution
- •3.9 Research Challenges
- •3.10 Concluding Remarks
- •3.11 Further Reading
- •3.12 Questions
- •3.13 Exercises
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •4.2 Representation of 3D Data
- •4.2.1 Raw Data
- •4.2.1.1 Point Cloud
- •4.2.1.2 Structured Point Cloud
- •4.2.1.3 Depth Maps and Range Images
- •4.2.1.4 Needle map
- •4.2.1.5 Polygon Soup
- •4.2.2 Surface Representations
- •4.2.2.1 Triangular Mesh
- •4.2.2.2 Quadrilateral Mesh
- •4.2.2.3 Subdivision Surfaces
- •4.2.2.4 Morphable Model
- •4.2.2.5 Implicit Surface
- •4.2.2.6 Parametric Surface
- •4.2.2.7 Comparison of Surface Representations
- •4.2.3 Solid-Based Representations
- •4.2.3.1 Voxels
- •4.2.3.3 Binary Space Partitioning
- •4.2.3.4 Constructive Solid Geometry
- •4.2.3.5 Boundary Representations
- •4.2.4 Summary of Solid-Based Representations
- •4.3 Polygon Meshes
- •4.3.1 Mesh Storage
- •4.3.2 Mesh Data Structures
- •4.3.2.1 Halfedge Structure
- •4.4 Subdivision Surfaces
- •4.4.1 Doo-Sabin Scheme
- •4.4.2 Catmull-Clark Scheme
- •4.4.3 Loop Scheme
- •4.5 Local Differential Properties
- •4.5.1 Surface Normals
- •4.5.2 Differential Coordinates and the Mesh Laplacian
- •4.6 Compression and Levels of Detail
- •4.6.1 Mesh Simplification
- •4.6.1.1 Edge Collapse
- •4.6.1.2 Quadric Error Metric
- •4.6.2 QEM Simplification Summary
- •4.6.3 Surface Simplification Results
- •4.7 Visualization
- •4.8 Research Challenges
- •4.9 Concluding Remarks
- •4.10 Further Reading
- •4.11 Questions
- •4.12 Exercises
- •References
- •1.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •1.2 A Historical Perspective on 3D Imaging
- •1.2.1 Image Formation and Image Capture
- •1.2.2 Binocular Perception of Depth
- •1.2.3 Stereoscopic Displays
- •1.3 The Development of Computer Vision
- •1.3.1 Further Reading in Computer Vision
- •1.4 Acquisition Techniques for 3D Imaging
- •1.4.1 Passive 3D Imaging
- •1.4.2 Active 3D Imaging
- •1.4.3 Passive Stereo Versus Active Stereo Imaging
- •1.5 Twelve Milestones in 3D Imaging and Shape Analysis
- •1.5.1 Active 3D Imaging: An Early Optical Triangulation System
- •1.5.2 Passive 3D Imaging: An Early Stereo System
- •1.5.3 Passive 3D Imaging: The Essential Matrix
- •1.5.4 Model Fitting: The RANSAC Approach to Feature Correspondence Analysis
- •1.5.5 Active 3D Imaging: Advances in Scanning Geometries
- •1.5.6 3D Registration: Rigid Transformation Estimation from 3D Correspondences
- •1.5.7 3D Registration: Iterative Closest Points
- •1.5.9 3D Local Shape Descriptors: Spin Images
- •1.5.10 Passive 3D Imaging: Flexible Camera Calibration
- •1.5.11 3D Shape Matching: Heat Kernel Signatures
- •1.6 Applications of 3D Imaging
- •1.7 Book Outline
- •1.7.1 Part I: 3D Imaging and Shape Representation
- •1.7.2 Part II: 3D Shape Analysis and Processing
- •1.7.3 Part III: 3D Imaging Applications
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.1.1 Applications
- •5.1.2 Chapter Outline
- •5.2 Mathematical Background
- •5.2.1 Differential Geometry
- •5.2.2 Curvature of Two-Dimensional Surfaces
- •5.2.3 Discrete Differential Geometry
- •5.2.4 Diffusion Geometry
- •5.2.5 Discrete Diffusion Geometry
- •5.3 Feature Detectors
- •5.3.1 A Taxonomy
- •5.3.2 Harris 3D
- •5.3.3 Mesh DOG
- •5.3.4 Salient Features
- •5.3.5 Heat Kernel Features
- •5.3.6 Topological Features
- •5.3.7 Maximally Stable Components
- •5.3.8 Benchmarks
- •5.4 Feature Descriptors
- •5.4.1 A Taxonomy
- •5.4.2 Curvature-Based Descriptors (HK and SC)
- •5.4.3 Spin Images
- •5.4.4 Shape Context
- •5.4.5 Integral Volume Descriptor
- •5.4.6 Mesh Histogram of Gradients (HOG)
- •5.4.7 Heat Kernel Signature (HKS)
- •5.4.8 Scale-Invariant Heat Kernel Signature (SI-HKS)
- •5.4.9 Color Heat Kernel Signature (CHKS)
- •5.4.10 Volumetric Heat Kernel Signature (VHKS)
- •5.5 Research Challenges
- •5.6 Conclusions
- •5.7 Further Reading
- •5.8 Questions
- •5.9 Exercises
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •6.2 Registration of Two Views
- •6.2.1 Problem Statement
- •6.2.2 The Iterative Closest Points (ICP) Algorithm
- •6.2.3 ICP Extensions
- •6.2.3.1 Techniques for Pre-alignment
- •Global Approaches
- •Local Approaches
- •6.2.3.2 Techniques for Improving Speed
- •Subsampling
- •Closest Point Computation
- •Distance Formulation
- •6.2.3.3 Techniques for Improving Accuracy
- •Outlier Rejection
- •Additional Information
- •Probabilistic Methods
- •6.3 Advanced Techniques
- •6.3.1 Registration of More than Two Views
- •Reducing Error Accumulation
- •Automating Registration
- •6.3.2 Registration in Cluttered Scenes
- •Point Signatures
- •Matching Methods
- •6.3.3 Deformable Registration
- •Methods Based on General Optimization Techniques
- •Probabilistic Methods
- •6.3.4 Machine Learning Techniques
- •Improving the Matching
- •Object Detection
- •6.4 Quantitative Performance Evaluation
- •6.5 Case Study 1: Pairwise Alignment with Outlier Rejection
- •6.6 Case Study 2: ICP with Levenberg-Marquardt
- •6.6.1 The LM-ICP Method
- •6.6.2 Computing the Derivatives
- •6.6.3 The Case of Quaternions
- •6.6.4 Summary of the LM-ICP Algorithm
- •6.6.5 Results and Discussion
- •6.7 Case Study 3: Deformable ICP with Levenberg-Marquardt
- •6.7.1 Surface Representation
- •6.7.2 Cost Function
- •Data Term: Global Surface Attraction
- •Data Term: Boundary Attraction
- •Penalty Term: Spatial Smoothness
- •Penalty Term: Temporal Smoothness
- •6.7.3 Minimization Procedure
- •6.7.4 Summary of the Algorithm
- •6.7.5 Experiments
- •6.8 Research Challenges
- •6.9 Concluding Remarks
- •6.10 Further Reading
- •6.11 Questions
- •6.12 Exercises
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 Retrieval and Recognition Evaluation
- •7.1.2 Chapter Outline
- •7.2 Literature Review
- •7.3 3D Shape Retrieval Techniques
- •7.3.1 Depth-Buffer Descriptor
- •7.3.1.1 Computing the 2D Projections
- •7.3.1.2 Obtaining the Feature Vector
- •7.3.1.3 Evaluation
- •7.3.1.4 Complexity Analysis
- •7.3.2 Spin Images for Object Recognition
- •7.3.2.1 Matching
- •7.3.2.2 Evaluation
- •7.3.2.3 Complexity Analysis
- •7.3.3 Salient Spectral Geometric Features
- •7.3.3.1 Feature Points Detection
- •7.3.3.2 Local Descriptors
- •7.3.3.3 Shape Matching
- •7.3.3.4 Evaluation
- •7.3.3.5 Complexity Analysis
- •7.3.4 Heat Kernel Signatures
- •7.3.4.1 Evaluation
- •7.3.4.2 Complexity Analysis
- •7.4 Research Challenges
- •7.5 Concluding Remarks
- •7.6 Further Reading
- •7.7 Questions
- •7.8 Exercises
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •8.2 3D Face Scan Representation and Visualization
- •8.3 3D Face Datasets
- •8.3.1 FRGC v2 3D Face Dataset
- •8.3.2 The Bosphorus Dataset
- •8.4 3D Face Recognition Evaluation
- •8.4.1 Face Verification
- •8.4.2 Face Identification
- •8.5 Processing Stages in 3D Face Recognition
- •8.5.1 Face Detection and Segmentation
- •8.5.2 Removal of Spikes
- •8.5.3 Filling of Holes and Missing Data
- •8.5.4 Removal of Noise
- •8.5.5 Fiducial Point Localization and Pose Correction
- •8.5.6 Spatial Resampling
- •8.5.7 Feature Extraction on Facial Surfaces
- •8.5.8 Classifiers for 3D Face Matching
- •8.6 ICP-Based 3D Face Recognition
- •8.6.1 ICP Outline
- •8.6.2 A Critical Discussion of ICP
- •8.6.3 A Typical ICP-Based 3D Face Recognition Implementation
- •8.6.4 ICP Variants and Other Surface Registration Approaches
- •8.7 PCA-Based 3D Face Recognition
- •8.7.1 PCA System Training
- •8.7.2 PCA Training Using Singular Value Decomposition
- •8.7.3 PCA Testing
- •8.7.4 PCA Performance
- •8.8 LDA-Based 3D Face Recognition
- •8.8.1 Two-Class LDA
- •8.8.2 LDA with More than Two Classes
- •8.8.3 LDA in High Dimensional 3D Face Spaces
- •8.8.4 LDA Performance
- •8.9 Normals and Curvature in 3D Face Recognition
- •8.9.1 Computing Curvature on a 3D Face Scan
- •8.10 Recent Techniques in 3D Face Recognition
- •8.10.1 3D Face Recognition Using Annotated Face Models (AFM)
- •8.10.2 Local Feature-Based 3D Face Recognition
- •8.10.2.1 Keypoint Detection and Local Feature Matching
- •8.10.2.2 Other Local Feature-Based Methods
- •8.10.3 Expression Modeling for Invariant 3D Face Recognition
- •8.10.3.1 Other Expression Modeling Approaches
- •8.11 Research Challenges
- •8.12 Concluding Remarks
- •8.13 Further Reading
- •8.14 Questions
- •8.15 Exercises
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •9.2 DEM Generation from Stereoscopic Imagery
- •9.2.1 Stereoscopic DEM Generation: Literature Review
- •9.2.2 Accuracy Evaluation of DEMs
- •9.2.3 An Example of DEM Generation from SPOT-5 Imagery
- •9.3 DEM Generation from InSAR
- •9.3.1 Techniques for DEM Generation from InSAR
- •9.3.1.1 Basic Principle of InSAR in Elevation Measurement
- •9.3.1.2 Processing Stages of DEM Generation from InSAR
- •The Branch-Cut Method of Phase Unwrapping
- •The Least Squares (LS) Method of Phase Unwrapping
- •9.3.2 Accuracy Analysis of DEMs Generated from InSAR
- •9.3.3 Examples of DEM Generation from InSAR
- •9.4 DEM Generation from LIDAR
- •9.4.1 LIDAR Data Acquisition
- •9.4.2 Accuracy, Error Types and Countermeasures
- •9.4.3 LIDAR Interpolation
- •9.4.4 LIDAR Filtering
- •9.4.5 DTM from Statistical Properties of the Point Cloud
- •9.5 Research Challenges
- •9.6 Concluding Remarks
- •9.7 Further Reading
- •9.8 Questions
- •9.9 Exercises
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.1.1 Allometric Modeling of Biomass
- •10.1.2 Chapter Outline
- •10.2 Aerial Photo Mensuration
- •10.2.1 Principles of Aerial Photogrammetry
- •10.2.1.1 Geometric Basis of Photogrammetric Measurement
- •10.2.1.2 Ground Control and Direct Georeferencing
- •10.2.2 Tree Height Measurement Using Forest Photogrammetry
- •10.2.2.2 Automated Methods in Forest Photogrammetry
- •10.3 Airborne Laser Scanning
- •10.3.1 Principles of Airborne Laser Scanning
- •10.3.1.1 Lidar-Based Measurement of Terrain and Canopy Surfaces
- •10.3.2 Individual Tree-Level Measurement Using Lidar
- •10.3.2.1 Automated Individual Tree Measurement Using Lidar
- •10.3.3 Area-Based Approach to Estimating Biomass with Lidar
- •10.4 Future Developments
- •10.5 Concluding Remarks
- •10.6 Further Reading
- •10.7 Questions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •Chapter Outline
- •11.2 Volumetric Data Acquisition
- •11.2.1 Computed Tomography
- •11.2.1.1 Characteristics of 3D CT Data
- •11.2.2 Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
- •11.2.2.1 Characteristics of 3D PET Data
- •Relaxation
- •11.2.3.1 Characteristics of the 3D MRI Data
- •Image Quality and Artifacts
- •11.2.4 Summary
- •11.3 Surface Extraction and Volumetric Visualization
- •11.3.1 Surface Extraction
- •Example: Curvatures and Geometric Tools
- •11.3.2 Volume Rendering
- •11.3.3 Summary
- •11.4 Volumetric Image Registration
- •11.4.1 A Hierarchy of Transformations
- •11.4.1.1 Rigid Body Transformation
- •11.4.1.2 Similarity Transformations and Anisotropic Scaling
- •11.4.1.3 Affine Transformations
- •11.4.1.4 Perspective Transformations
- •11.4.1.5 Non-rigid Transformations
- •11.4.2 Points and Features Used for the Registration
- •11.4.2.1 Landmark Features
- •11.4.2.2 Surface-Based Registration
- •11.4.2.3 Intensity-Based Registration
- •11.4.3 Registration Optimization
- •11.4.3.1 Estimation of Registration Errors
- •11.4.4 Summary
- •11.5 Segmentation
- •11.5.1 Semi-automatic Methods
- •11.5.1.1 Thresholding
- •11.5.1.2 Region Growing
- •11.5.1.3 Deformable Models
- •Snakes
- •Balloons
- •11.5.2 Fully Automatic Methods
- •11.5.2.1 Atlas-Based Segmentation
- •11.5.2.2 Statistical Shape Modeling and Analysis
- •11.5.3 Summary
- •11.6 Diffusion Imaging: An Illustration of a Full Pipeline
- •11.6.1 From Scalar Images to Tensors
- •11.6.2 From Tensor Image to Information
- •11.6.3 Summary
- •11.7 Applications
- •11.7.1 Diagnosis and Morphometry
- •11.7.2 Simulation and Training
- •11.7.3 Surgical Planning and Guidance
- •11.7.4 Summary
- •11.8 Concluding Remarks
- •11.9 Research Challenges
- •11.10 Further Reading
- •Data Acquisition
- •Surface Extraction
- •Volume Registration
- •Segmentation
- •Diffusion Imaging
- •Software
- •11.11 Questions
- •11.12 Exercises
- •References
- •Index
488 |
P.G. Batchelor et al. |
contexts, as it provides an all-in-one solution (but it is not free software, although student licenses are fairly affordable at time of writing). Free software packages such as Octave, vtk, the GNU Scientific Library GSL, BLAS-LAPACK and FFTW can, in theory, be used for the same purposes, but with more effort. For some surface manipulation, the CGAL library is emerging as a standard and there is the excellent package: Meshlab. Currently, GPU computing is playing an important role in some medical imaging applications, see, for example, OpenCL and CUDA.
11.11 Questions
1.For the grid in Fig. 11.6, sketch the result of marching squares for a threshold of 11.5. Comment on any issues that arise and suggest possible solutions.
2.In volume rendering, a ray sent out from a pixel on the viewing plane encounters the following scalar values with increasing distance from the viewpoint: 22, 80, 45, 40, 120, 100. The color and opacity transfer function is:
α |
Cred |
Cgreen |
Cblue |
Scalar value |
|
0.0 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
1.0 |
10 |
< x < 30 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
30 |
< x < 70 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
70 |
< x < 90 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
90 |
< x < 150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculate the pixel color using back-to-front rendering as well as front-to-back rendering (the results should be the same).
3.How would the MRI intensity inhomogeneity effect (see Fig. 11.4) be likely to affect the result of a region growing algorithm? What measures could be taken to reduce such effects?
4.For diffusion tensor imaging, build the equations in [Dxx , Dxy , . . .] that need to be solved from the model equation.
5.Four markers are placed on a patient’s head as fiducials for registration. In the preoperative CT scan these are found to be at the following locations:
x |
y |
z |
|
|
|
23.5 40.4 13.3 50.2 −35.5 8.5 −43.7 28.4 35.0 −18.4 38.7 18.2
(i)Calculate the position of the point in the CT scan that is most accurately located with these fiducials.
(ii)Define the terms fiducial registration error (FRE), fiducial localization error (FLE) and target registration error (TRE).
11 3D Medical Imaging |
489 |
(iii)The fiducial points are translated to the centroid and rotated to lie along their principal axes. Their new positions are:
|
x |
y |
z |
|
|
|
|
|
−3.5 |
30.6 −2.6 |
|
−70.8 −13.5 |
0.4 |
||
45.4 |
−21.7 |
−2.8 |
|
|
28.9 |
4.6 |
5.0 |
A target is located at (13.1, −1.0, −61.4) in this coordinate system. If the fiducials can be located to an accuracy of 3 mm, what is the TRE at this point?
(iv)The resulting transformation is used as an input to a surface matching algorithm. In what situations can surface registration give a poor result? How might this affect the choice of regions on the head where the fiducials are placed? What methods can be used to overcome these issues?
11.12Exercises
1.The aim of this exercise is to explore the effects of some of the image reconstruction algorithms on images. By using the libraries described in the Software section, you can try to do it in C++, but we will describe it as Matlab tasks for simplicity. Firstly, write code to generate simple test images of cubes, spheres and so on. Compute their ‘MRI data’ (Fourier transform) and ‘CT or PET data’ (Radon transform). Explore the undersampling effects by (a) removing odd lines of data; (b) removing outer parts of data; (c) removing inner parts of data; and (d) removing random parts of data. To make it more sophisticated, instead of simply removing, you can apply spatial transforms to corresponding undersampled data, and then merge back. The following code gives a template:
N = 2 5 6 ; M = N ; P = M; |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
R = |
1 ; r = R / 2 ; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ X , Y , Z ] = meshgrid ( l i n s p a c e (−R, R ) , N,M, P ) ; |
||||||||
cube |
= ( X < |
r \& |
Y < |
r |
\& |
Z < |
r ) ; |
|
m r i |
= f f t n ( cube ) ; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c t = |
radon ( cube ) ; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% 1 ) subsample : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
% a ) |
remove |
odd l i n e s |
o f |
d a t a |
and r e c o n s t r u c t |
|||
% b ) |
remove |
o u t e r |
p a r t s |
o f |
d a t a and |
r e c o n s t r u c t |
||
% c ) |
remove |
i n n e r |
p a r t s |
o f |
d a t a and |
r e c o n s t r u c t |
||
% d ) |
remove |
random |
p a r t s |
o f |
d a t a and |
r e c o n s t r u c t |
490 P.G. Batchelor et al.
% 2 ) m o t i o n : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
% a ) |
move odd l i n e s |
o f |
d a t a and |
r e c o n s t r u c t |
|
||||||||||
% b ) |
move o u t e r |
p a r t s |
o f |
d a t a and |
r e c o n s t r u c t |
||||||||||
% c ) |
move i n n e r |
p a r t s |
o f |
d a t a and |
r e c o n s t r u c t |
||||||||||
% d ) |
move random p a r t s |
o f |
d a t a |
and |
r e c o n s t r u c t |
||||||||||
% 3 ) n o i s e : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
% Add |
n o i s e t o |
t h e d a t e b e f o r e |
r e c o n s t r u c t i o n i n |
||||||||||||
% |
a l l |
examples |
above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
% 4 ) s u r f a c e e x t r a c t i o n : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
% H i n t : i s o s u r f a c e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
% |
5 ) |
c u r v a t u r e c o m p u t a t i o n : |
compute |
c u r v a t u r e s |
|||||||||||
% |
o f |
t h e o b j e c t . As |
i t |
i s |
a |
cube , |
you |
s h o u l d |
g e t |
||||||
% v e r y h i g h c u r v a t u r e s |
a t |
c o r n e r s and |
edges , |
and |
|||||||||||
% |
z e r o o t h e r w i s e . |
I s t h a t |
t h e |
case? |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% H i n t : you have t o ensure |
t h a t |
t h e |
s u r f a c e |
i s |
|||||||||||
% o r i e n t e d , i . e . t h a t a l l t h e normals p o i n t |
|
||||||||||||||
% outwards o r i n w a r d s . |
For c u r v a t u r e s |
( mean |
|
||||||||||||
% c u r v a t u r e ) you need |
t h e |
d i h e d r a l |
a n g l e |
a t |
an , |
||||||||||
% edge and f o r Gauss c u r v a t u r e , |
you |
need |
t h e |
|
|||||||||||
% |
a n g l e d e f e c t |
2 p i |
− sum ( a n g l e s ) |
|
a t |
v e r t i c e s . |
|||||||||
% See |
c h a p t e r 2 |
i n |
|
t h i s book f o r |
|
more |
d e t a i l s |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.Write code in Matlab to implement the recursive region growing algorithm
introduced in Algorithm 11.1. The recursive function should take six arguments: the image being segmented, the current region map (−1 = unknown, 0 = background, 1 = foreground), the x and y coordinates of the current pixel, the intensity of the original seed pixel and the intensity distance used to determine if a pixel is similar to the original seed pixel. The following sample code sets up a simple test image, calls the recursive function and displays the result.
% i n p u t |
image |
|||
im = [ 0 3 0 0 0 ; . . . |
||||
1 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
1 ; . . . |
2 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
0 ; . . . |
1 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
1 ; . . . |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
0 ] ; |
% |
i n i t i a l i z e o u t p u t t o unknown |
|||
r |
= −1 |
ones ( s i z e ( im ) ) ; |
11 3D Medical Imaging |
491 |
% c a l l r e g i o n g r o w i n g f u n c t i o n
% a r g s : |
image , r e g i o n , seed |
x , seed y , |
|||
% seed |
i n t e n s i t y , |
i n t e n s i t y |
d i s t a n c e |
||
r = regionGrow ( im , r , 3 , 3 , im ( 3 , 3 ) , 1 . 0 ) ; |
|||||
% any u n v i s i t e d |
p i x e l s a r e |
s e t t o background |
|||
r ( f i n d ( r |
== −1)) |
= |
0 ; |
|
|
% d i s p l a y |
o r i g i n a l |
image and r e g i o n |
|||
f i g u r e ; |
imagesc ( im ) ; colormap ( g r a y ) ; |
||||
f i g u r e ; |
imagesc ( r ) ; colormap ( g r a y ) ; |
If you have implemented the region growing algorithm correctly, the result of the segmentation should be as follows:
r |
= |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.Implement the marching squares algorithm to create a connected series of vertices for a given threshold. You will need to interpolate the position of the vertices and consider the case table of 16 possibilities to decide how to connect these. Run this on the same image as for Exercise 2 with a threshold of 2.5.
4.Implement a simple volume renderer that accumulates voxels from back-to-
front along the z-axis of a 3D image and produces a rendering in the x– y plane. Render the images of the sphere (perfect and with noise or missing data) from Exercise 1 with a transfer function that gives a color of white and an opacity somewhere between 0 and 1. To introduce volumetric lighting, calculate the voxel gradient by finite difference and scale the voxel color by the dot product of the normalized gradient with (0, 0, 1). Comment on the differences between these renderings and the previous isosurfaces.
5.Download the segmentation package ITK-SNAP9 and work through the tutorial using their example MRI image. How do the region competition and edge-based snakes differ from simple region growing? In what situations would region growing be better or worse than the ITK-SNAP methods?
9www.itksnap.org/download.