2383
.pdfloss of human lives. It reflects on the |
covered by load or safety factors are |
|
reliability of the design procedures as |
revealed in weaknesses after construc- |
|
well as on the quality of construction. |
tion. Geotechnical investigations are |
|
Use of poor construction materials and |
very important for the design of bridge |
|
inadequate design |
assumptions are |
foundations. |
generally this suspects. Designers and |
This paper describes a case history of |
|
contractors have to be extra cautious |
failure of three reinforced concrete |
|
while designing |
and constructing |
(RC) highway bridges built across |
bridges to resist the effects of natural |
Wadi El Nagah watercourse in the |
|
hazards like floods, earthquakes and |
northeastern part of Libya. Two out of |
|
landslides in addition to normal traffic |
three bridges collapsed and one suf- |
|
loads. Studies have been made in re- |
fered damage that could be repaired. |
|
cent years to understand the pattern of |
All these bridges have been victim of |
|
occurrence, of these natural phenome- |
heavy floods in the wadi, which caused |
|
na statistically, attempting to compute |
severe damage due to scour, erosion |
|
probability of their future occurrence. |
and undermining of the soil below the |
|
The cumulative effect of various as- |
foundations of intermediate piers and |
|
sumptions and approximations intro- |
the abutments. In all cases, parts of the |
|
duced at the analysis and design stage |
approach road embankments were also |
|
of a bridge which are not sufficiently |
washed away. |
Fig. 38
Description of the Bridges |
|
Bridge A was badly damaged by the |
|
The location of three bridges built |
flood water. One abutment collapsed |
||
across Wadi El Nagah are shown in |
and the beams at that end of the span |
||
Fig. 38. The catchment area of the |
were twisted. Foundation blocks of the |
||
wadi across which these bridges were |
intermediate piers were exposed. Part |
||
built consists of hilly terrain. Mean |
of foundation soil of the far end abut- |
||
annual rainfall precipitation in this |
ment eroded away, leaving the founda- |
||
region is around 400-600 mm. Almost |
tion block partially suspended. Expan- |
||
all the precipitation occurs during the |
sion joints between the concrete deck |
||
winter months, from October to |
sections over the intermediate supports |
||
January of each year. |
|
widened considerably due to distortion |
|
Bridge A, built about three decades |
and the lateral displacement of the |
||
ago, consisted of three simply |
bridge decks. |
||
supported spans of pre-stressed |
The old multispan RC bowstring girder |
||
reinforced |
concrete beams |
supported |
Bridge B totally collapsed. Its two |
on two central piers and two end RC |
intermediate plain concrete supporting |
||
abutments. The foundation of all these |
piers overturned sideways along with |
||
supporting |
elements consisted of |
the foundation blocks and moved |
|
shallow block foundations. Bridge B |
downstream to Bridge C. |
||
was a bowstring girder RC bridge |
The new Bridge C did not suffer any |
||
supported on two massive intermediate |
appreciable structural damage although |
||
plain concrete pillars and anchored at |
scouring of the wadi bed, accompanied |
||
both ends to earth fill embankments. |
by undermining of the soil below the |
||
Bridge C, part of the new coastal |
foundation blocks of the vertical piers |
||
highway, consisted of an RC portal |
and the east RC abutment did occur, |
||
frame with propped |
overhangs. |
leaving them partially suspended (Fig. |
|
Vertical supporting members of the |
3). The approach connection to the |
||
portal are shear wall type piers 10 m |
bridge deck from the east was |
||
high and 0.7 m X 6.0 m in cross |
destroyed due to the collapse of the |
||
section. The foundations of these piers |
approach concrete slab caused by |
||
consisted of RC blocks 10 mX 5 mX |
erosion of the earth fill at the back of |
||
1.5 m resting on plain concrete mats of |
the abutment. This bridge has been |
||
300 mm depth and located 4 m below |
repaired and opened to traffic. |
||
the planned wadi bed level. The RC |
CAUSES OF DAMAGE |
||
abutments of this bridge were em- |
|||
bedded in the approach road embank- |
|
||
ments at both ends. Gabion protection |
Scour of the wadi bed, undermining |
||
was provided as per the design. |
the soil below the intermediate piers |
||
Damage Assessment |
|
and the abutments' foundation blocks, |
|
|
and the erosion of the approach road |
||
|
|
|
embankments during a heavy flood, |
|
|
|
were the causes of the damage and col- |
lapse of these bridges. This is not the |
Bridge C, has been rehabilitated. The |
||||
first time such damage has occurred. |
main problems in rehabilitating Bridge |
||||
"Bridges are vulnerable to natural |
C were to support the foundation |
||||
hazards ranging from hurricanes to |
blocks of one intermediate pier and |
||||
earthquakes. But scour is the problem |
one abutment, and to provide a new |
||||
that has caused more bridges to Mil |
reinforced |
concrete |
approach |
road |
|
than all of rest combined. One study... |
slab. |
|
|
|
|
concluded that among 86 bridge fail- |
The repair work had to be planned |
||||
ures [in the USA] from 1961 to 1976, |
very carefully in order not to disturb |
||||
48 were due to floods. Out of 48, 46 |
the structural safety of the other parts. |
||||
were due to bridge scour" [1]. Another |
of the bridge. The sequence of the re- |
||||
recent survey revealed 494 of the 823 |
pair work consisted of removing loose |
||||
bridge failures in the USA from 1951 |
and eroded soil from below one side of |
||||
to 1988 were primarily the result of |
the foundation block at a time, |
||||
scour of foundation material [2]. |
thorough compaction of the base and |
||||
In addition, some other circumstances |
measuring any deflection of the sus- |
||||
aggravated the damage and led to col- |
pended part of the foundation block. |
||||
lapse of one of these bridges. The dam- |
This part was then block concreted. |
||||
ages occurred partly due to shortcom- |
Similarly, the other side of the pier was |
||||
ings of the design and partly due to ig- |
prepared and block concreted. |
|
|||
norance of the effects of a temporary |
To ensure proper contact between old |
||||
road embankment across the wadi |
and the new concrete blocks, epoxy |
||||
about 500 m upstream from Bridge A |
mortar was injected between them. |
||||
[3]. This temporary road embankment |
Then the central part below the foun- |
||||
acted like an earthfill dam across the |
dation block was cleared of all soil de- |
||||
wadi, creating an artificial lake up- |
posits. Precast concrete beams were in- |
||||
stream. Due to heavy floods, this dam' |
serted on the prepared base. Finally, |
||||
gave way, releasing a flood with a fast |
the end sections were grouted, thus |
||||
moving flow of water about 12 m high, |
providing another foundation slab to |
||||
as observed from the water marks on |
the existing foundation block. A |
||||
the soffit of the deck of Bridge C, re- |
similar procedure was adopted for the |
||||
sulting in erosion and undermining |
repair of the abutment foundation. The |
||||
scour of the wadi bed and the side em- |
depth of the new foundation system |
||||
bankments. The damage to Bridge A |
was based on scour depth calculations. |
||||
was severe due to its undesirable loca- |
After carrying out all necessary repairs |
||||
tion at a bend in the wadi, as shown in |
for rehabilitation, the wadi bed and |
||||
Fig. 38. |
approach |
road |
embankment |
slopes |
|
Rehabilitation |
were suitably protected. This bridge |
||||
has now been operational for two |
|||||
|
years. The owner was advised to |
||||
Two of the three bridges on Wadi Al |
dismantle Bridge A, so as to provide a |
||||
Nagah were abandoned and the third, |
clear path |
for |
the |
wadi stream ap- |
proaching Bridge C. To date, this dam- |
- Location of a bridge near a bend in a |
|||||||||
aged bridge has not been removed. |
stream should be avoided. |
|
||||||||
Lessons |
|
|
|
- |
There is a need for research to es- |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
tablish |
the |
relationship |
between |
||
- Bridge planning and design is not |
flow depth, flow velocity and total |
|||||||||
only a job of structural engineer, but is |
scour depth for actual conditions in the |
|||||||||
the joint responsibility of a team of |
field. |
|
|
|
|
|||||
structural, hydrology and geotechnical |
References |
|
|
|
||||||
engineers. Structurally well |
designed |
|
|
|
||||||
bridges have failed as a result of |
[1] MURILLO, J. A. The Scourge of |
|||||||||
hydraulic conditions, primarily due to |
||||||||||
scour of foundation material. |
|
Scour. ASCE Civil Engineering, July |
||||||||
- The uncertainty of collecting proper |
1987, pp. 66-69. |
|
|
|||||||
hydrological data, the probability of |
[2] HUBER, F. Update: Bridge Scour. |
|||||||||
occurrence of future severe storms and |
ASCE |
Civil |
Engineering, |
September |
||||||
their effect on the bridge system |
1991, pp 62-63. |
|
|
|||||||
require |
advance preparation for all |
[3] |
MALLICK,D.V.; |
ELWAFATHI, |
||||||
eventualities. |
|
|
A.M. |
|
|
|
|
|||
- |
Initial evaluation of scour vulnera- |
Damage Study of Three Reinforced |
||||||||
bility of streambed material is es- |
Concrete Bridges over Wadi El Nagah, |
|||||||||
sential. Due to the stochastic nature of |
Libya. Conference on Our World in |
|||||||||
the |
hydraulic |
parameters |
involved |
Concrete & Structures, Vol. VI |
||||||
in bridge design, appropriate scour |
(1987), |
Singapore, 25-26 August |
||||||||
countermeasure |
programmes, like |
1987, pp 50-66. |
|
|
||||||
installing riprap, guide banks to protect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
abutments |
and |
embankments and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
sheet piling along the face of piers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
and/or abutments, must be clearly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
planned in advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
A NEW FOOTBRIDGE, AUSTRIA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
At the site selected for a new foot- |
|||||
Harald Egger, |
|
|
bridge, the banks of the Mur River in |
|||||||
Prof. Dr Hermann Beck, Research |
Graz. Austria, have an elevation dif- |
|||||||||
Assist. |
|
|
|
ference of about 2.2 m. The designers |
||||||
Univ. of Technology Graz, Graz, |
felt that a simple straight beam in- |
|||||||||
Austria |
|
|
|
clined across the river at this point |
||||||
DESIGN |
|
|
|
would |
be aesthetically |
unsatisfactory. |
||||
|
|
|
They therefore opted for spanning the |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
river with a beam that was slightly ele- |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
vated at its |
centre and horizontally |
supported by columns, with its upper surface serving as a footpath.
bank it extends from the stiffening member's sides.
Fig. 39
footpath divides "before leading down to the left and right. The aim of designing a fine-membered bearing structure led to the development of a compound beam construction comprising a stiffening member, with a tensioning member and a compression member on the underside of the bridge (Fig. 39).
The height and width of the stiffening member decrease toward the centre of the bridge from the supports at either end, i.e., toward the compression member. The shape of the composite prismatoid thus also determined the spread of the tensioning member underneath toward its supports.
In accordance with the geometry and design principle of the entire construction, the bridge deck has been designed as a folded plate structure forming an integral part of the bearing system. On one bank the deck rests upon the body of the, stiffening member; on the other
The bearing structure of the bridge rests on two pairs of columns on the banks of the river, cantilevering on either side. On the right bank it extends to the old non-bearing embankment wall, while on the left-hand bank the body of the stiffening member ends in a cantilever design, with the walking deck extended from it to permit direct access to the footpath without ramps or stairs.
Construction
The stiffening member of the bridge covers an effective span of 55.8 m. Its cross section has a height of 2.0 m over the columns and 0.7 m at the Centre. The bridge deck, a hollow steel plate, is folded on its lower side and forms part of the stiffening member. The deck is connected asymmetrically to the trilateral body of the stiffening
member in relation to the centre of the |
ing out from the centre to the supports, |
bridge. On the left side of the bridge its |
where they are eccentrically connected |
top follows the top edge of the stiffen- |
to the stiffening member. This spread- |
ing member; on the right side, starting |
ing is a consequence of the geometrical |
from the centre of the bridge, it inter- |
configuration of the bearing structure |
sects with the lateral surfaces of the |
and design considerations. Stability of |
prismatoid, parallel to its bottom |
the stiffening member is also improved |
edges. The compound stiffening mem- |
by this expansion and by the eccentric |
ber is also asymmetrical. Its character- |
connections, the latter also reducing |
istic cross section is shown in Fig. 40. |
deflection of the stiffening member. |
|
To achieve the required stiffness for |
|
the entire compound bearing structure, |
|
145 mm thick bands of grade Fe 510 |
|
steel were used for the tensioning |
|
member. These relatively heavy bands |
|
were attached to the stiffening member |
|
at the quarter points of the central |
|
bridge span and supported against |
|
wind loads. The connection of the |
|
tensioning bands to the compression |
|
member shown in Fig. 41, which |
Fig. 40 |
illustrates both the solution originally |
|
required by the invitation to tender and |
The walls of the trilateral prismatoid |
the final method employed by the |
are 15 mm thick over its entire length, |
contractor. Behind the supports, the |
but its longitudinal braces - an |
bands were anchored to angle cleats |
additional flange plate welded where |
that were laterally welded to the sleeve |
the bridge deck begins to descend - |
plates of the stiffening member. The |
were adapted to the asymmetry of the |
steel bands were stretched in place, but |
stiffening member, as was the quality |
not prestressed. |
of the plate used. The trilateral |
The stiffening member rests on four |
prismatoid is reinforced by transverse |
slender free-standing columns. It is |
bulkheads placed 2.2 m from each |
fixed to one column, and longitudinal- |
other, corresponding to the folds of the |
ly movable but transversally fixed to |
cover plate of die bridge deck. The |
the other three so that all four columns |
entire structure is sealed airtight. All |
may contribute to the transmission of |
parts, whether assembled in the shop |
wind loads. In addition, the entire |
and at the site, were joined by welding. |
bearing structure resting on the |
In order to make sufficient allowance |
columns is protected against transverse |
for floodwaters, the tensioning mem- |
wind attack from below. |
ber underneath the bridge has a very |
For reasons of time and cost, the bear- |
flat design, with the elements spread- |
ing structure of the bridge, which put |
heavy demands on manufacturing skills, was produced at the plant. It was manufactured in large sections which were then transported by road to the site, in part with the bridge deck already attached to the bearing structure.
Fig. 41
These sections were assembled into larger units, whenever possible directly on the river's banks, and hoisted into position by an automobile crane. Erection was accomplished in three night-shifts. The sections were placed on a temporary support and the entire bearing structure was then joined together by welding. After a final insertion of the tensioning member on the underside of the bridge, the auxiliary support was removed.
Architects:
G.Domenig and H. Eisenköck, Graz, assisted by G. Wallner
Civil Engineers:
H.Egger, Graz, assisted by H. Beck
Contractors:
Alpine Bau (concrete), Salzburg Vöest-Alpine (steel), Linz
Service date: 1993
IS ISO 9001 EFFECTIVE FOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANCIES?
Jørgen |
Laustsen, |
Civil |
Eng. |
on a large scale - but mostly for the |
Copenhagen, Denmark |
|
|
sake of marketing. |
|
|
|
|
|
Attitudes towards ISO 9001 among |
The quality assurance processes de- |
English, German and Danish consult- |
|||
scribed in ISO 9001 have not been |
ing engineers were the subject of a re- |
|||
greeted with unanimous enthusiasm by |
cent research study [1]. The study is |
|||
consulting |
engineers. |
Consultants in |
based on interviews with twenty-nine |
|
England, Germany and Denmark have |
consulting engineering companies and |
|||
in fact responded quite differently to |
institutions. Thirty-five additional |
|||
the ISO 9001 quality assurance stan- |
companies responded to questionnaires |
|||
dard. Danish engineers have generally |
on the subject. |
|||
declined to adopt the standard, the |
Criticism in Denmark |
|||
Germans are decidedly more keen on |
||||
their own DIN standards, whereas the |
|
|||
English have sought ISO certification |
|
In Denmark the Association of Con- |
studied. Nearly 40 % of the companies |
|||||
sulting Engineers (FRI) has rejected |
in the survey had implemented ISO |
|||||
the ISO standard, arguing that it does |
9001 and were certified in accordance |
|||||
not cover all the critical elements of a |
with it. Additional companies had be- |
|||||
knowledge-based service. As a conse- |
gun to implement the standard. This |
|||||
quence of this position, dialogue be- |
tendency is substantiated by a survey |
|||||
tween ISO and FRI has ceased. |
|
of the European Construction Institute |
||||
Only one consultancy had been certi- |
(ECI), 52 % of whose members - |
|||||
fied in accordance with ISO 9001. The |
contractors, consultants and clients - |
|||||
majority of companies have instead es- |
replied that they were certified, while |
|||||
tablished a quality assurance system |
11 % were in the process of |
|||||
based on the paragraphs in the standard |
implementing the standard, and 16% |
|||||
that |
seemed |
relevant, |
supplementing |
expressed the wish to do so. |
||
them as required. Several companies |
|
|||||
have |
likewise |
produced |
cross |
|
||
references to the ISO standard, as |
|
|||||
some clients have demanded a quality |
|
|||||
assurance system in accordance with |
|
|||||
the ISO standard. The standard is, |
|
|||||
therefore, used - but always as a refer- |
|
|||||
ence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubt in Germany |
|
|
|
|||
In Germany, the ISO standard has only |
|
|||||
recently been introduced and until now |
|
|||||
only a few contractors have im- |
|
|||||
plemented it. As yet, no engineering |
Fig. 42 |
|||||
consultancy |
has |
done |
so. |
Several |
|
|
consultants stated that they could not |
In conversations with English consul- |
|||||
understand the necessity of the ISO |
tants it was not unusual to hear that |
|||||
standard. The general opinion of those |
they had/in fact, no expectations for |
|||||
questioned was that the way the Ger- |
substantial positive effects from imple- |
|||||
man construction industry and the DIN |
menting the standard. It is seen as a |
|||||
standards are related makes the ISO |
necessary evil, one which enables con- |
|||||
standard superfluous. |
|
|
sulting engineers to qualify for projects |
|||
Activity in England |
|
|
where the client demands the ISO |
|||
|
|
certificate. The standard and the quali- |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
ty assurance system it promotes are |
The attitude towards the ISO standard |
thus seen as a dubious formality, |
|||||
(BS 7550) in England differs dramati- |
useful only as a marketing tool. |
|||||
cally |
from |
the |
other |
two countries |
|
The real value of ISO certification |
Given the scepticism of so many of the |
|||||||
seems limited. Both clients and consul- |
respondents in the study, it is reason- |
|||||||
tants who were surveyed agreed that |
able to question if the ISO standard is |
|||||||
ISO 9001 certification does not actual- |
indeed applicable for engineering con- |
|||||||
ly ensure better quality, but only that |
sultancies. The standard was drawn up |
|||||||
certain |
documented |
guidelines |
had |
for manufacturing companies with tan- |
||||
been followed. |
|
|
|
gible end-products. As the standard |
||||
In England, a small industry has grown |
only covers the critical processes for |
|||||||
up around the standard. Around 6000 |
that type of production, it is not certain |
|||||||
persons now work on implementing, |
that it is suitable for knowledge-based |
|||||||
certifying and maintaining quality as- |
services like an engineering con- |
|||||||
surance systems. |
|
|
|
sultancy. The critical processes are not |
||||
No Extra Fee |
|
|
|
necessarily the same, so the question |
||||
|
|
|
is: How relevant is the standard for |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
consultancy. This can be illustrated in |
||
Is a client willing to pay extra for this |
Fig. 42. |
|
|
|||||
extra initiative? A survey carried out |
The differences between product-based |
|||||||
by Prof. Peter Barrett, Salford Univer- |
and knowledge-based endeavors are |
|||||||
sity, England, shows that only 3% of |
considerable. The main reason for this |
|||||||
clients take quality assurance into ac- |
is the cognitive and iterative aspects of |
|||||||
count when they select consultants. 95 |
consultancy. The process is difficult to |
|||||||
% of the cornpanies and clients sur- |
forecast |
and |
schematicise, which |
|||||
veyed did not expect a higher price for |
makes it problematic to assure quality. |
|||||||
the services of a certified company. |
The process of the work of an |
|||||||
Many employees still repudiate the |
engineering consultancy is illustrated |
|||||||
quality assurance system, and many |
in Fig. 43. |
|
||||||
companies are still not working consci- |
|
|
|
|||||
entiously with the system. There is, for |
|
|
|
|||||
example, no widespread information |
|
|
|
|||||
about the costs of ISO-certified quali- |
|
|
|
|||||
fy. In all three countries, only the ex- |
|
|
|
|||||
penses of internal and external audits |
|
|
|
|||||
are registered. Only in Denmark are |
|
|
|
|||||
expenses such as compensation and |
|
|
|
|||||
reparations |
registered. In |
all |
three |
|
|
Fig. 43 |
||
countries, however, there is no existing |
|
|
||||||
standard |
as |
an alternative |
to the |
ISO |
Revision of ISO 9000 |
|||
9000 standard. |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Is ISO |
9001 |
Applicable |
for |
The complications stemming from the |
||||
Engineering Consultancies? |
|
iterative |
work |
process has been con- |
sidered by the ISO/TC 176 Task Force
when it started to revise the ISO 9000 |
The ISO 9001 standard, in its revised |
|||||||
standard. The standard has been split |
form, will be a reasonable basis for an |
|||||||
up into four main areas: |
|
effective quality assurance system. The |
||||||
- |
Hardware |
|
|
standard is a good starting point for a |
||||
- |
Software |
|
|
continuous |
quality optimisation, |
and |
||
- |
Processed materials |
|
thus a good basis for Total Quality |
|||||
- Service, including engineering con- |
Management (TQM), etc. Therefore, it |
|||||||
sultancies. |
|
|
is disappointing that no one has been |
|||||
The structure of the standards ISO |
able to support this initiative and in |
|||||||
9001, 9002, 9003 and 9004 is undergo- |
that way participate in the preparation |
|||||||
ing considerable change. ISO 9004 |
of the standards and guidelines which |
|||||||
will, for instance, be used for contrac- |
will have considerable importance for |
|||||||
tual situations in the future. When the |
engineering consultancy in the coming |
|||||||
revised standards are published at the |
years. |
|
|
|
|
|||
end of 1996, the companies who have |
Reference |
|
|
|
||||
certified according to the existing |
|
|
|
|||||
standards have to re-certify within 12 |
[1] LAUSTSEN, J. Quality Assurance |
|||||||
months, a process that represents con- |
and the ISO 9001 Standard in |
|||||||
siderable effort and time. |
|
Consulting |
Engineering |
Companies. |
||||
Too Late? |
|
|
M. |
Sc. |
research |
project |
at |
|
|
|
Loughborough Univ. of |
Technology, |
|||||
|
|
|
|
Dept of Civil Eng., Longborough, UK, |
||||
Engineering |
organisations |
unfortu- |
September, 1994. |
|
|
|||
nately have not been able to influence |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
the coming revised ISO standards for |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
service, but one initiative has been |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
made through the establishment of a |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
EFCA Task Force (European Federa- |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
tion of Engineering Consultancies As- |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
sociation). |
Regrettably, |
there are |
|
|
|
|
|
problems with establishing the task force, and their work cannot be finished before the revised ISO standard is promulgated.