- •Contents
- •Preface
- •1. Classification and physicochemical properties of surface-active substances
- •1.1 Synthetic detergent production
- •1.2 Classification of surface-active substances
- •1.3 Detergents and surfactants
- •1.4 Synthetic surfactant or soap
- •What's the difference?
- •1.5 Soaps and detergents
- •Cleansing action of soap
- •1.7 Synthetic detergents
- •1.8 Advantages and disadvantages of synthetic detergents with respect to soaps
- •Washing powders
- •1.9 Structure and properties of surface-active substances
- •Critical concentration of cluster formation
- •Control questions
- •1.10 Surface tension
- •1.11 Physical and chemical action of washing substances and detergent solutions
- •Control questions
- •1.12 Solubilization
- •1.13 Washing action
- •Control questions
- •2. Synthetic detergents composition
- •2.1 Inorganic compounds in synthetic detergent compositions
- •Alkaline salts of inorganic acids
- •Purposes of alkaline electrolytes
- •Control questions
- •2.2 Organic components used in synthetic detergents structure
- •Main components of synthetic detergents’ compositions
- •Hydrotropic substances.
- •Control questions
- •2.4 Production of enzyme-based detergents
- •2.5 Enzyme stabilization
- •2.6 Applications of enzyme-based detergents
- •3. Synthetic detergents production
- •3.1 Reception, storage and preparation of raw material for synthetic detergent manufacture
- •3.2 Technology of compositions preparation
- •Control questions
- •3.3 Classification of synthetic detergents. Kinds of pollutions.
- •Control questions
- •3.4 Technology of washing compositions drying
- •3.5 Spray drying technology
- •Control questions
- •3.6 Basic technological circuits of powdery synthetic detergent manufacture by periodic and continuous ways
- •Control questions
- •3.7 Capital equipment at granulated synthetic detergents manufacture
- •3.8 Technology of drying in fluidized layer
- •Control questions
- •3.9 Technology of granulated synthetic detergents by combined methods
- •3.10 Packaging of powders
- •Basic raw material
- •Auxiliary raw material
- •Control questions
- •4.3 Chemistry and technology of soap production
- •Control questions
- •4.4 Cake synthetic detergents
- •4.5 Production of cake synthetic detergents by forming method
- •4.6 Production of cake synthetic detergents by pressing method
- •Control questions
- •4.7 Manufacture of paste and liquid detergents
- •4.8 Compositions and production technology of paste-like synthetic detergents
- •Control questions
- •4.9 Compositions and technology of liquid synthetic detergents production
- •Control questions
- •5. Chemical means of hygiene and cosmetics
- •5.1 Shampoos
- •Jump of quality
- •Electrostatics laws in operation
- •To expect, to prevent
- •Laziness -- the engine of progress
- •Content and form
- •5.2 Teeth care means
- •Literature list:
2.5 Enzyme stabilization
Most early enzyme products such as detergent proteases were just powders. Almost all of them were granulated and further protected by coatings. Another method to prevent enzyme dust in the air is liquid formulations. Today a lot of research work is being done in the different formulations and stabilization techniques in many enzyme detergent production facilities.
The enzymes used in various detergent formulations are subject to proteolytic and autolytic degradation on storage and sudden exposure to harsh operating conditions results in rapid inactivation of enzyme activity. Loss of enzyme activity is also encountered during storage in the factory, shipment to client(s) and/or storage in client(s) facilities. Hence, storage stability is of prime concern to enzyme manufactures. The rate of enzyme inactivation is largely dependent on temperature, pH and other detergent components such as surface active agents, sequestrants and bleaching agents. Moreover, the higher the temperature and alkalinity, the less stable is the enzyme.
The loss of the enzyme activity is mainly due to the partial unfolding of the polypeptide chain, since the inactivating agent breaks down the delicate balance of noncovalent bonds which maintain the native conformation. The ideal approach to stabilize the enzyme would be to identify the mechanism of inactivation and then design a procedure which would prevent that mechanism.
In order to protect enzyme against denaturation, addition of stabilizers like calcium salts, sodium borate, polyhydric alcohols and protein preparations have proved successful. To prevent contamination of the final commercial crude preparation during storage, addition of sodium chloride at 18–20% concentration has been suggested. These processes maintain the enzyme activity and improve storage stability. In certain cases, for the purpose of convenience in handling and storage, liquid enzyme preparations are often brought to powder form by vacuum or air drying which are milder and less expensive than lyophilization.
The stabilization of enzymes has also been made possible through use of protein engineering to design tailor-made enzymes with specific enzyme properties and stability and this technique is leading new insights into the process of biocatalysis. Protein engineering is rapidly emerging today as a new science and is basically an art of modifying an existing protein or creating de novo, a protein of pre-specified properties. From a commercial viewpoint, this technology is inherently complex, costly and time consuming. Despite these inherent drawbacks, commercial detergent enzyme producers adopt this technology for producing novel and/or superior enzymes with stable, new and/or improved properties like stain removing ability, improved stability due to resistance to oxidizing agents (oxygen-based bleaching), etc.
2.6 Applications of enzyme-based detergents
Data published up to now indicate that the enzyme detergents are being mainly explored for their application in laundry, dishwashing, textile and other such industries. Of late, in view of their advantages and increased potentiality, some researchers have tried to use them in the food and dairy industries. The different applications wherein the enzyme detergents are being currently used are:
In laundry
The microbial enzymes which have found application so far in laundry are the proteases, amylases and lipases. More recently, the cellulases have also been employed in the detergent industry with an added dimension. The proteases hydrolyze the proteinaceous residues of blood, egg, grass and sweat to form soluble peptides which are subsequently easily removed by detergent suds. The amylases degrade the residues of starchy foods like porridge, potatoes, gravies, custard, chocolate, etc. to dextrin, while the lipases catalyze the hydrolysis of salad oil, sauces, lipstick, etc. The cellulases in the detergents degrade mainly the microfibrils which are generated during continuous use and repeated washings of the garment and also help in restoring the original shine and colour of the garment.
The washing performance of the enzyme detergent depends on many factors to achieve better results. These are detergent composition and dosage, pH and buffer capacity, water hardness, washing time and temperature, mechanical handling, soiling agents, textile types to name a few. In addition, the specificity of the enzyme is another most important parameter. As a general opinion, it is considered that a detergent enzyme should have as wide a specificity as possible. For example, a protease should be capable of degrading as many proteins as possible. However, a reasonably good wash performance can be achieved by a specific protease, in comparison to a non-specific protease. As the hydrolysis proceeds, small peptide fragments are formed by the action of an unspecific protease, which are rather difficult to remove as they are not very much soluble in detergent solutions. On the other hand, larger protein or peptide fragments are formed on hydrolysis with a specific protease due to the breakdown of very few peptide bonds which can be easily removed during the washing process. Presently, use of dual enzymes in detergent formulations is practiced, wherein the enzymatic hydrolysis and degradation can be broadened considerably in comparison to a single enzyme approach.
Recently, workers of the Genencor International Inc., USA have developed enzymes called endoglycosidases which deglycosylate biopolymers like glycoproteins which are widely distributed in living organisms. They employed rDNA technology to develop Endo-b -N-acetyl glucosaminidase H (Endo H) as a cleaning agent. Endo H has a unique property to remove bacteria (Staphylococci and E. coli) from glass and cloth surfaces in buffer and detergent solutions.
At present, most of the advanced countries like Japan, United States and some European countries almost invariably use the detergents incorporated with enzymes. Interestingly, in Japan, all detergent brands contain enzymes. In India, a few premium detergent brands presently available in the market like Ariel (Procter and Gamble (India) Ltd.), Surf Ultra, Rin Biolites, Revel Plus (Hindustan Lever Ltd.) and Zymo (Henkel) contain enzymes in their formulations. Recently, Procter and Gamble (P&G) has introduced a new cellulase enzyme in the detergent powder, Ariel, presently marketed in India, that eliminates the fuzz formed during washing and tumble-drying, particularly of the cotton fabrics. The manufacturers claim that use of this product retains the colour and improves the texture of the fabric on repeated washings.Now the detergent compositions or components comprising certain cyclic amine based polymers and certain anionic cellulose materials are made. This combination imparts improved appearance and integrity benefits to fabrics and textiles laundered in washing solutions formed from such compositions, while also providing improved whiteness and/or brightness maintenance.
It is known that fabrics and textiles simply wear out over time and with use. Also, the laundering of the fabrics and textiles, over many cycles, can accentuate and contribute to the deterioration of the integrity and the appearance of such fabrics and textiles. Deterioration of fabric integrity and appearance can manifest itself in several ways. For example, short fibers are dislodged from woven and knit fabric/textile structures by the mechanical action of laundering. These dislodged fibers may form lint, fuzz or “pills” which are visible on the surface of fabrics and diminish the appearance of newness of the fabric. Further, repeated laundering of fabrics and textiles, especially with bleach-containing laundry products, can remove dye from fabrics and textiles and impart a faded, worn out appearance as a result of diminished color intensity, and in many cases, as a result of changes in hues or shades of color.
Given the foregoing, there is clearly an ongoing need to identify materials which could be added to laundry detergent products that would associate themselves with the fibers of the fabrics and textiles laundered using such detergent products and thereby reduce or minimize the tendency of the laundered fabric/textiles to deteriorate in appearance. Any such detergent product additive material should, of course, be able to benefit fabric appearance and integrity without unduly interfering with the ability of the laundry detergent to perform its fabric cleaning function. In patent literature describes the use of certain cyclic amine based polymers which are found to provide excellent integrity benefits to fabrics.
The inventor has now found that when these amine based polymers are used in combination with specific anionic cellulose material, the fabric care and fabric integrity can be further improved. It is believed that these benefits are achieved because the anionic cellulose material and the amine based polymers having a positively charged group, interact together in such a manner that both polymeric materials have an improved surface activity, resulting in a better interaction with or deposition onto the surface of the fabric. It is believed that when the polymeric materials are present in an intimate mixture, such an interaction between the polymeric materials is even more likely to occur or even stronger, resulting in a greater benefit obtained when the polymeric materials are present in the product as an intimate mixture or in the same component or granule.
Not only improved fabric integrity is achieved, but also an improved soil removal and whiteness or brightness maintenance is achieved when these compounds are used together. The inventor also found that when the anionic cellulose material and the amine based polymer are present in the intimate mixture, such as in the form of agglomerate, compacted granule or spray dried granule, these benefits are even more apparent.
