Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Чернодед Я.В._ Особенности коммуникатора и аудитории как условия эффективного убеждения _2016..docx
Скачиваний:
4
Добавлен:
01.07.2025
Размер:
616.91 Кб
Скачать

Список литературы

  1. Albarracin D., Cohen J. B., Kumkale G. T. When communications collide with recipients’ actions: effects of post-message behavior on intentions to follow the message recommendation // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003. Vol. 29. P. 834-845.

  2. An C., Pfau M. The efficacy of inoculation in televised political debates // Journal of Communication. 2004. Vol. 54. P. 421-436.

  3. Andreoli V., Worchel S. Effects of media, communicator, and message position on attitude change // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1978. Vol. 42. P. 59-70.

  4. Andsager J. L., Austin E. W., Pinkleton B. E. Gender as a variable in interpretation of alcohol-related messages // Communication Research. 2002. Vol. 29. P. 246-269.

  5. Areni C. S., Ferrell M. E., Wilcox J. B. The persuasive impact of reported group opinions on individuals low vs. high in need for cognition: rationalization vs. biased elaboration? // Psychology & Marketing. 2000. Vol. 17. P. 855-875.

  6. Baron R. S., Bellman S. B. No guts, no glory: courage, harassment and minority influence // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2007. Vol. 37. P. 101-124.

  7. Bohner G., Moskowitz G. B., Chaiken S. The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information // European Review of Social Psychology. Ed. by W. Stroebe, M. Hewstone. 1995. Vol. 6. P. 33-68.

  8. Bohner G., Ruder M., Erb H. P. When expertise backfires: contrast and assimilation effects in persuasion // British Journal of Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 41. P. 495-519.

  9. Bohner G., Siebler F. Paradigms, processes, parsimony, and predictive power: arguments for a generic dual-process model // Psychological Inquiry. 1999. Vol. 10. P. 113-123.

  10. Broemer P. Ease of imagination moderates reactions to differently framed health messages // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2004. Vol. 34. P. 103-119.

  11. Buunk A. P., Blanton H., Schuurman M. K., Siero F. W. Issue involvement and low versus high-power style as related to attitude change in sex-role egalitarism // Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 2005. Vol. 24. P. 412-420.

  12. Cameron K. A., Jacks J. Z., O’Brien M. E. An experimental examination of strategies for resisting persuasion // Current Research in Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 7. P. 205-224.

  13. Chaiken S., Duckworth K. L., Darke P. When parsimony fails… // Psychology Inquiry. 1999. Vol. 10. P. 118-123.

  14. Clark III R. D. Effects of majority defection and multiple minority sources on minority influence // Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice. 2001. Vol. 5. P. 57-62.

  15. Darke P. R., Chaiken S., Bohner G., Einwiller S., Erb H. P., Hazlewood D. Accuracy motivation, consensus information, and the law of large numbers: effects on attitude judgment in the absence of argumentation // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1998. Vol. 24. P. 1205-1215.

  16. DeWall C. N., Visser P. S. Openness to attitude change as a function of temporal perspective // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2006. Vol. 32. P. 1010-1023.

  17. Dolinski D., Ciszek M., Godlewski K., Zawadzki M. Fear-then-relief, mindlessness, and cognitive deficits // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 32. P. 435-447.

  18. Falomir-Pichastor J. M., Butera F., Mugny G. Persuasive constraint and expert versus non-expert influence in intention to quit smoking // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 32. P. 209-222.

  19. Falomir-Pichastor J. M., Mugny G., Invernizzi F. Smoker’s (dis)satisfaction, persuasive constraint, and influence of expert and non-expert sources // Swiss Journal of Psychology. 2006. Vol. 65. P. 7-14.

  20. Foon A. E. A social structural approach to speech evaluation // The Journal of Social Psychology. 1986. Vol. 126. P. 521-530.

  21. Freeman M. A., Hennessy E. V., Marzullo D. M. Defensive evaluation of antismoking messages among college-age smokers: the role of possible selves // Health Psychology. 2001. Vol. 20. P. 424-433.

  22. Groenendyk E. W., Valentino N. A. Of dark clouds and silver linings effects of exposure. To issue versus candidate advertising on persuasion, information retention, and issue salience // Communication Research. 2002. Vol. 29. P. 295-319.

  23. Hall S., Bishop A. J., Marteau T. M. Does changing the order of threat and efficacy information influence the persuasiveness of threat messages? // British Journal of Health Psychology. 2006. Vol. 11. P. 333-343.

  24. Holtgraves T., Lasky B. Linguistic power and persuasion // Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 1999. Vol. 18. P. 196-205.

  25. Hornsey M. J., Oppes T., Svensson A. “It`s OK if we say it, but you can`t”: responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 32. P. 293-307.

  26. Hosman L. A., Siltanen S. A. Powerful and powerless language forms. Their consequences for impression formation, attributions of control of self and control of others, cognitive responses, and message memory // Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 2006. Vol. 25. P. 33-46.

  27. Hullett C. R. Using functional theory to promote sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing. The impact of value-expressive messages and guilt // Communication Research. 2004. Vol. 31. P. 363-396.

  28. Huskinson T. L. H., Haddock G. Individual differences in attitude structure: variance in the chronic reliance on affective and cognitive information // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2004. Vol. 40. P. 82-90.

  29. Jacks J. Z., Cameron K. A. Strategies for resisting persuasion // Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2003. Vol. 25. P. 145-161.

  30. Jacks J. Z., Devine P. G. Attitude importance, forewarning of message сontent, and resistance to persuasion // Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2000. Vol. 22. P. 19-29.

  31. Jonas E., Greenberg J. Terror management and political attitudes: the influence of mortality salience on German’s defense of the German reunification // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2004. Vol. 34. P. 1-9.

  32. Keating J. P., Latane B. Politicians on TV: The image is the message // Journal of Social Issues. 1976. Vol. 32. №4. P. 116-132.

  33. Kruglanski A. W., Thompson E. P. Persuasion by a single route: a view from the unimodel // Psychological Inquiry. 1999. Vol. 10. P. 83-109.

  34. Lundgren S. R., Prislin R. Motivated cognitive processing and attitude change // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1998. Vol. 24. P. 113-123.

  35. Maio G. R., Olson J. M. Attitude dissimulation aтd persuasion // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1998. Vol. 34. P. 182-201.

  36. Meyers-Levy J., Malaviya P. Consumer’s processing of persuasive advertisements: an integrative framework of persuasion theories // Journal of Marketing. 1999. Vol. 63. P. 45-60.

  37. Miller A. Watching viewers watch TV: processing live, breaking, and emotional news in a naturalistic setting // J&MC Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 83. P. 511-529.

  38. Mitchell M., Sawyer J. K. The impact of gossip valence and relationship type on source perceptions and message quality // Conference Papers — International Communication Association, 2003 Annual Meeting. - San Diego, P. 1-29.

  39. Nabi R., Roskos-Ewoldsen D., Carpentier F. Prior knowledge as a moderator of fear appeal effects // Conference Papers - International Communication Association, 2003 Annual Meeting. - San Diego. P. 1-8.

  40. Orbell S., Hagger M. Temporal framing and the decision to take part in type 2 diabetes screening: effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on persuasion // Health Psychology. 2006. Vol. 25. P. 537-548.

  41. Parton S. R., Siltanen S. A., Hosman L. A., Langenderfer J. Employment interview outcomes and speech style effects // Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 21. P. 144-161.

  42. Petty R. E., Brinol P., Tormala Z. L. Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis // Journal of Personality and Social Psycho logy. 2002. Vol. 82. P. 722-741.

  43. Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitudes change. - N.-Y. 1986.

  44. Petty R. E., Tormala Z. L., Rucker D. D. Resisting persuasion by counterarguing: an attitude strength perspective // Perspectivism in social psychology: The yin and yang of scientific progress. - Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. 2004. P. 37-51.

  45. Petty R. E., Wells G. I., Brock T. C. Distraction can exchange or reduce yielding to persuasion // Journal of Personality and social Psychology. 1976. Vol. 34. P. 874-884.

  46. Reichert T., Xue F., Fosu I. Sexual self-schema and female responses to sexually oriented advertising // Conference Papers - International Communication Association, 2005 Annual Meeting. - N.-Y. P. 1-23.

  47. Rubin B. Political television. - Belmont, CA: Wadswort. – 1984. Vol. 6. №2. P. 171-181.

  48. Sachdev I., Wright A. Social influence and language learning. An experimental study // Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 1996. Vol. 15. P. 230-245.

  49. Saks M. J., Hastie R. Social psychology in court. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1978.

  50. Schul Y., Mayo R. Two sources are better than one: the effects of ignoring one message on using a different message from the same source // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1999. Vol. 35. P. 327-345.

  51. Siu W. L. An integrative approach to message judgment: priming and prospect theory // Conference Papers. Annual Meeting. - N.-Y.: International Communication Association, 2005. P. 1-14.

  52. Sparks G. G., Pellechia M., Irvine C. The repressive coping style and fright reactions to mass media // Communication Research. 1999. Vol. 26. P. 176-192.

  53. Spiegel S., Grant-Pillow H., Higgins E. T. How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2004. Vol. 34. P. 39-54.

  54. Taylor S. E., Thompson S. C. Stalking the illusive "vividness" effect // Psychological Review. 1982. Vol. 89. №2. P. 155-181.

  55. Tormala Z. L., Clarkson J. J., Petty R. E. Resisting persuasion by the skin of one’s teeth: the hidden success of resisted persuasive messages // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2006. Vol. 91. P. 423-435.

  56. Tormala Z. L., Petty R. E. Resistance to persuasion and attitude certainty: the moderating role of elaboration // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2004. Vol. 30. P. 1446-1457.

  57. Waldron V. R., Applegate J. L. Similarity in the use of person-centered tactics: effects on social attraction and persuasiveness in dyadic verbal disagreements // Communication Reports. 1998. Vol. 11. P. 155-165.

  58. Werth L., Foester J. How regulatory focus influences consumer behavior // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2007. Vol. 37. P. 33-51.

  59. Wiegman O. Communication modality and attitude change in a realistic experiment // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1989. Vol. 19. №10. P. 828-840.

  60. Ziegler R., Diehl M. Is politician A or politician B more persuasive? Recipients’ source preference and the direction of biased message processing // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2003. Vol. 33. P. 623-637.

  61. Андреева Г. М., Богомолова Н. Н., Петровская Л. Зарубежная социальная психология XX столетия: Теоретические подходы: Учебное пособие для вузов. - М.: Аспект Пресс, 2001. - 288 с.

  62. Аронсон Э. Общественное животное. - М., 1998.

  63. Бойко В. В. О восприятии телевизионного сообщения в зависимости от темпа чтения // Вопр. психологии. - 1972. - № 3. - С. 47-57.

  64. Гулевич О. А. Психология коммуникации. - М.: Московский психолого-социальный институт, 2007. - с. 99.

  65. Ефимова Н. Е. Молодежь как субъект массовой коммуникации // Дети и молодежь в мире массовой коммуникации. - М., 1988.

  66. Исправникова А. Я. Аудитория телевидения: исследования за рубежом // Аудитория. - 1987. - № 1.

  67. Коробейников В. С. Комплексный подход к изучению местных средств массовой информации // Массовая коммуникация. Материалы конференции. - Тарту, 1986.

  68. Лауристин М., Вихалемм П. Роль социальных установок в восприятии газетного текста // Смысловое восприятие речевого сообщения. - М.: Наука, 1976. - С. 168-182.

  69. Московичи С. (ред.) Социальная психология. - СПб, 2007.

  70. Парыгин Б. Д. Научно-техническая революция и личность // Б. Д. Парыгин. - М.: Политиздат, 1978. - 240 с.

  71. Росс Л., Нисбетт Р. Человек и ситуация. Перспективы социальной психологии // Пер. с англ. В. В. Румынского под ред. Е. Н. Емельянова, B. C. Магуна - М.: Аспект Пресс, 1999. - 429 с.

  72. Саппак В. С. Телевидение и мы. Четыре беседы. - М.: Искусство, 1963. - 182 с.

  73. Сёчке Т. К понятию эффективности массовой коммуникации // Массовая коммуникация в социалистическом обществе // Под ред. A. B. Дмитриева и др. - Л.: Наука, 1979. - С. 25-32.

  74. Социологический словарь ИАЦ "SOCIUM". Электронный ресурс. URL: http://www.socium.info/dict.html (дата обращения: 01.03.2016).

  75. Тертычный А. А. Психология публицистического убеждения. - М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1989. - 68 с.

  76. Хараш А. У. Межличностный контакт как исходное понятие психологии устной пропаганды // Вопр. Психологии. - 1977. - № 4. - С. 52-63.

  77. Шерковин Ю. А. Психологические проблемы массовых информационных процессов // Ю. А. Шерковин. - М.: Мысль, 1973. - 215 с.