
- •1. The old germanic ls, their classification and principal features.
- •Common phonetic characteristics of the germanic languages
- •3. The chronological division of the history of english.
- •4. The scandinavian invasion and its effect on english.
- •5. The norman conquest and its effect on the history of english.
- •Oe dialects. Me dialects. The rise of the london dialect
- •7. The oe alphabets. Oe major written records in oe.
- •8. Major spelling changes in me, their causes.
- •9. The oe vowel system (monophthongs and diphthongs). Major changes.
- •12. Consonant changes in me and ne (growth of affricates, loss of certain consonants).
- •14. 15. The oe noun system (grammatical categories, major types of declension).
- •16. The oe personal pronouns, their grammatical categories and declension. Lexical replacement in me.
- •17. The oe adjective (grammatical categories and declensions).
- •18. The oe demonstrative pronouns, their grammatical categories and declension. The rise of the articles.
- •19. The oe verb (grammatical categories, morphological types).
- •20. Oe strong verbs and their further development.
- •21. Oe weak verbs and their further development.
- •22. Oe preterit-present verbs and their further development.
- •24. The rise of analytical forms in verbal system in me.
- •25. The oe infinitive and its further development. The rise of the gerund.
- •26. The origin of plural endings in Modern English nouns.
- •27.28. Types of syntactic relations in oe.
- •29. Oe vocabulary, its volume and etymological structure.
- •30. Affixation in oe.
- •31. Scandinavian loan-words in me.
30. Affixation in oe.
In OE the vocabulary mainly grew by means of word-formation. prefixation – was a productive way (unlike in ModE):
IE prefixes (OE un- (negative));
Germanic prefixes (OE mis-, be-, ofer-(over-));
prefixes were widely used with verbs, but were far less productive with the other parts of speech (e.g. OE ζān (to go) – ā-ζān (to go away) – be-ζān (to go round) – fore-ζān (to precede), etc.);
prefixes often modified lexical meaning (e.g. OE siþ (journey) – for-siþ (death));
there were grammatical prefixes, e.g ζe-:
was used to build Participle 2 of strong verbs (e.g. OE sitten (to sit) – ζesett (sat), etc.);
turned durative verbs into terminative (e.g. OE feran (to go) – ζeferan (to reach), etc.).
suffixation – was the most productive way, mostly applied to nouns and adjectives, seldom to verbs.
Classification of OE suffixes:
Suffixes of agent nouns (-end (OE frēond (friend)), -ere (OE fiscere (fisher)), -estre (feminine) (OE bæcestre (female baker)), etc.);
Suffixes of abstract nouns (-t (OE siht (sight)), -þu (OE lengþu (length)), -nes/nis (OE beorhtnes (brightness), blindnis (blindness)), -unζ/inζ (OE earnunζ (earning)), etc.);
Adjectival suffixes (-iζ (OE hāliζ (holy)), -isc (OE mannisc (human)), -ede (OE hōcede (hooked)), -sum (OE lanζsum (lasting)) etc.);
New suffixes derived from noun root-morphemes (-dōm (OE frēodōm (freedom)), -hād (OE cīldhād (childhood)), -lāc (OE wedlāc (wedlock)), -scipe (OE frēondscipe (frendship)), etc.);
New suffixes derived from adjective root-morphemes (-lic (OE woruldlic (worldly)), -full (OE carfull (careful)), -lēas (OE slǽplēas (sleepless)), etc.).
Borrowings from classical Ls in ME.
After the Norman Conquest the main spheres of the Latin L remained: church; law; academic activities.
The surge of interest in the classics during the Age of the Renaissance led to a new wave of borrowings from Latin and Greek (through Latin mainly).
Latin: abstract concepts (anticipate, exact, exaggerate, explain, fact, dislocate, accommodation, etc.); affixes de- (demolish, destroy, etc.),
ex- (extract, , explore, explain, etc.), re- (reread, retell, retry, etc.), -ate (locate, excavate, etc.), -ent (apparent, present, turbulent, etc.), -ct (correct, erect, etc.)
Greek: theatre (drama, episode, scene, theatre, etc.); literature (anapest, climax, epilogue, rhythm, etc.); rhetoric (dialogue, metaphor, etc.); roots for creation of new words; affixes -ism (humanism, mechanism, aphorism, etc.), -ist (protagonist, terrorist, cyclist, etc.),
anti- (antibody, antidote, antibiotic, etc.), di- (digest, diverse, etc.), neo- (neo-realism, neo-conservatism, etc.)
Greco-Latin Hybrids (words one part of which is Greek and the other one – Latin): e.g. tele-graph, socio-logy, tele-vision, etc.
Compounding in OE and ME. The rise of conversion.
Word composition was highly productive way of developing the vocabulary in OE.
Compound nouns contained various first components – stems of nouns, adjs and verbs; their second components were nouns. The pattern “N+N” was probably the most productive type of all. Compound nouns with adj-stems as the first components were less productive. Compound nouns with verb and adverb-stems were rare.
Compound adjs were formed by joining a noun-stem to an adj. the most peculiar pattern of compound adjs was the so-called “bahuvrihi type” – adj+noun-stem as the second component of an adj.
The remarkable capacity of OE for derivation and word-composition is manifested in numerous words formed with the help of several methods: negative prefix, adj-stem, noun-stem turning into a suffix, suffix.
Derivation: Prefixation (verbs, adjs); suffixation (nouns, adjs). Word composition: nouns, adjs.
In ME word compounding was less productive than in OE period. As before, compounding was more characteristic of nouns and adjs than verbs.
Compound words of the ME were formed after the word-building patterns inherited from OE, modifications of these patterns and new structural patterns. In addition to compounds made of native stems there appeared many hybrids with stems of diverse origin.
Compound nouns were built according to a variety of patterns. The most productive type – 2 noun-stems – was inherited from OE.
Conversion was a new method of word derivation which arose in Late ME and grew into a most productive, specially English way of creating new words. Conversion is effected through a change in the meaning, the gramm paradigm and the syntactic use of the word in the sentence. The word is transformed into another part of speech with an identical initial form, e.g. NE house n and house v.
The growth of conversion is accounted for by gramm and lexical changes during the ME period: reduction of endings and suffixes and the simplification of the morphological structure of the word. After the loss of endings and suffixes a large number of E verbs and nouns became identical in form.
The use of conversion was not restricted to the formation of verbs from nouns, when the new relations within the pairs had been well established, the reverse process could occur as well: nouns came to be derived from verbs.
In present-day E. conversion has grown onto one of the most productive ways of word-building, accounting for the free transformation of nouns into verbs and verbs into nouns through a change in their syntactic position.