3.3 Многопартийные системы

Голосов Г.В. Партийные системы России и стран Восточной Европы. – М.: Весь Мир. 1999.

Сморгунов Л. Современная сравнительная политология. М.: РОССПЭН, 2002.

Шмачкова Т.В. Теории коалиций и становление российской многопартийности (методики рационализации политического процесса) // Полис 1996. №5. С. 28-52.

Breton A. and Galeotti G. Is Proportional Representation Always the Best Electoral Rule? // Public Finance, 40, 1985, P. 1-16.

Hudson John. Preferences, loyalty and party choice // Public Choice Vol. 82, Issue 3/4, March 1995 P. 325-340.

Laver M., Schofield N. Multiparty Government. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1991.

Lijphart Arend The Political Consequences of Election Laws, 1945-85 // American Political Science Review, 84, June 1990, P. 481-96.

Longley Neil. Legislative systems with absolute party discipline: Implications for the agency theory approach to the constituent-legislator link // Public Choice Vol. 97, Issue 1/2, October 1998 P. 121-141.

Merlo A. Economic Dynamics and Government Stability in Postwar Italy // Rev. Econ. Statist. Nov. 1998 80(4) P. 629-637.

Pennings P., Keman H., Kleinnijenhuis J. Research in Political Science. An Introduction to Comparative Methods and Statistics. London, Thousand Oaks; New Delhi, Sage publications, 1999.

Taylor M., Laver M. Government Coalitions in Western Europe.- European Journal of Political Research, 1973, vol. 1, p. 195-248.

3.4. Теорема Эрроу о невозможности

Arrow K.J. Social Choice and Individual Values, N.Y.: John Wiley and sons, 1951, rev.ed. 1963.

Hansen P. Another Graphical Proof of Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem – Journal of Economic Education, 2002, vol. 33, № 3, p. 217-235.

Lott John R. Donald Wittman's The myth of democratic failure // Public Choice. Vol. 91, Issue 3/4, June 1997. P. 1-13

Riker W.H., Liberalism Against Populism, W.H. Freeman, 1982, Chs. 6, 7, 9, and 10.

Rowley Charles K. Donald Wittman‘s The myth of democratic failure // Public Choice Vol. 91, Issue 3/4, June 1997, P. 15-26.

Saari D. Decisions and Elections. Explaining the Unexpected. Cambridge University Press, 2001, ch. 2-3, p. 21-102.

Sen A., Personal Utilities and Public Judgments: Or What's Wrong with Welfare Economics? // Economic Journal, 1979, 89, P. 537-588; reprinted in A. Sen, Choice, Welfare and Measurement, sections 1-4.

Sen A. Social Choice Theory: A Reexamination // Econometrica, January 1977, 45, P. 53-89; reprinted in A. Sen, Choice, Welfare and Measurement.

Vickrey W. Utility, Strategy and Social Decision Rules.- Journal of Economics, 1960, vol. 74, p. 507-535.

3.5. Федерализм и общественный выбор

Остром В., Смысл американского федерализма. Что такое самоуправляющееся общество / Предисл. А. Оболонского. – М.: Арена, 1993. [1991]

Таллок Г., Новый федералист / Общ. ред. Осадчей И. М., Ранневой Н. А., Чернявской Г. В. Вступительное слово Осадчей И. М. – М.: Фонд "За экономическую грамотность", 1993. [1991]

Barnes W. Ledebur L. The New Regional Economics. The U.S. common market and the global economy. L. Sage Publications. 1998

Buchanan James M. Federalism and Individual Sovereignty // Cato Journal, Vol. 15, No 2-3. 1995.

Federalism and Individual Sovereignty: Comment on Buchanan // Cato Journal, Vol. 15, No 2-3. 1995.

Lavrov A., Markushkin A. The Fiscal Structure of the Russian Federation. Financial Flows Between the Center and the Regions. N.Y. East-West Institute M.E. Sharpe. 2001

Peter Ordeshook and Olga Shvetsova, If Hamilton and Madison Were Merely Lucky, What Hope Is there for Russian Federalism? April, 1995, WP #158

Slemrod J. Federal Tax Policy in the real world. Cambridge University Press. 1999.