Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Large Scale Farming - ver 10.docx
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
15.11.2019
Размер:
3.65 Mб
Скачать

Key metrics

Landbank size, ths ha (current and harvested in 2011)

Storage capacity, kt

Source: Company data

Source: Company data

Crop structure (corn, other grains, oilseeds, other), 2011

Crop yields, 2010-11 average

Source: Company data

Source: Company data

MCap, USD mln lhs and ADT, USD ths rhs

EV/ha, USD

Source: Bloomberg

Source: Company data, Bloomberg, Concorde Capital

Per ha comparison

Harvest value and production costs, 2011

Adjusted EBITDA, USD/ha

Note: Harvest value is calculated as crop sales plus the book value of agricultural produce at yearend minus the book value of agricultural produce at year start. For Kernel and Astarta, sugar beet value is estimated at the same prices as Mriya reports, for comparison purposes. Based on harvested landbank size.

Source: Company data, Concorde Capital calculations

Note: EBITDA figures adjusted for the revaluation of biological assets. See Appendix T for details on methodology. Based on harvested area.

Source: Company data, Concorde Capital

Total assets, USD/ha

PP&E, USD/ha

Note: Based on landbank size at yearend and total assets attributable to the agricultural segment.

Source: Company data, Concorde Capital

Note: Based on landbank size at yearend

Source: Company data, Concorde Capital

Working capital, USD/ha, eop

Current biological assets, USD/ha of winter sowings, eop

Note: Based on landbank size at yearend

Source: Company data, Concorde Capital

Note: Based on land under winter crops at yearend

Source: Company data, Concorde Capital

Management credibility

The high dispersion in the production processes of Ukrainian farmers over both space and time makes it impossible to check key operating data, yields and costs applied. This increases investors` (and auditors) reliance on figures provided by management and thus makes credibility a critical issue.

We attempt to assess management credibility by evaluating several key issues related to disclosure, its timing and consistency.

Qualitative characteristics of management credibility

Agroton

IMC

KSG Agro

Mriya

MCB Agricole

Sintal

Astarta

kernel

MHP

Negative indicators

Management uses biological asset revaluation aggressively, boosting accounting EBITDA figures

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

no

no

yes**

Management provides guidance including on biological revaluation*

no

yes

yes

no

no

no

no

n/a**

yes**

Non-acquisition CapEx is significant and not disclosed/executed according to plan

yes

no

no

yes

no

no

no

no

no

Frequent and significant PP&E revaluation

no

no

no

yes

no

no

no

no

no

Selling prices are not transparent – either from sales to related parties or unclear premiums/discounts to Ukraine’s averages

no

no

no

yes

yes

yes

no

no

no

Responses to IR requests take more than a week

yes

yes

yes

no

yes

yes

no

no

no

Sales to related parties are significant

no

no

no

yes

no

no

no

no

no

Qualifications by/outstanding issues with auditors

yes

no

yes

no

no

yes

no

no

no

Positive indicators

Both revenues and COGS sides of biological revaluation are disclosed in audited financial statements

yes

no

no

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

Both revenues and COGS sides of biological revaluation are disclosed on request

yes

no

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

Audited financials are reported within the first four months of the year

yes

yes

no

yes

no

no

yes

yes

yes

Key operating data is reported transparently and consistently: yields and costs per ha

no

no

no

yes

no

yes

yes

yes

no

Landbank acquisition costs are reported with a breakdown to landlease rights and other assets

no

no

no

yes

n/a

yes

no

yes

no

Growth strategy is consistent

no

yes

no

yes

yes

no

yes

yes

yes

Sum of negative scores

6

7

9

6

5

6

1

0

4

* Which implies management is not only forecasting such parameters as weather conditions but also forecasts the amount of future revaluations

** Farming makes up a relatively small share of the business thus the overall contribution of biological revaluation is less important

Source: Concorde Capital

Our general impression is that processors (Astarta, Kernel, MHP) provide a better level of management credibility than pure farmers. Among pure farmers, we found all companies expect Industrial Milk Company and Sintal Agriculture to have critical concerns from a minority shareholder’s perspective.

Critical concerns from the minority shareholder point of view

Key concerns

Agroton

  • auditors failed to find adequate evidence for USD 66.2 mln in revenues in 2011, or 2/3 of the total, issuing a qualified opinion

KSG Agro

  • ability to keep costs low

  • growth strategy is sporadic and does not match its balance sheet

Mriya

  • 42% of revenues and 45% of EBITDA in 2011 derived through the sales of sugar beets to related parties at USD 73/t vs. our estimate of the fair price of USD 45/t

  • overly aggressive CapEx without visible payback

MCB Agricole

  • After the company failed to list on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (December 2011), we see company as a clear acquisition target. Moreover, the track record of acquisitions of public companies in Ukraine is not inspiring for minority shareholders.

Source: Concorde Capital

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]