
- •Investment Case 11
- •Valuation summary 37
- •Investment case 53
- •Investment Case
- •Companies Compared Stock data
- •Key metrics
- •Per ha comparison
- •Management credibility
- •Market Overview Summary
- •Ukraine in global context Ukraine produces 2-3% of world soft commodities
- •Sunflower oil, corn, wheat, barley and rapeseed are Ukraine’s key soft commodities to export
- •Ukraine is 8th in arable land globally
- •Key inputs used in crop farming Ukraine`s climate favorable for low-cost agriculture
- •Soil fertility map
- •Machinery use far below developed countries
- •Land trade moratorium makes more benefits
- •Fertilizer use
- •Inputs prices: lease cost is Ukraine’s key cost advantage
- •Case study: Production costs in Ukraine vs. Brazil for corn and soybean
- •Farming Efficiency Ukrainian crop yields lag the eu and us, on par with Argentina and Brazil, above Russia’s
- •5Y average yields, t/ha and their respective 10y cagRs
- •Yields at a premium in Ukraine on the company level
- •Growth Growth should come from yield improvement, crop structure reshuffle and acreage increase
- •Crop structure is gradually shifting to more profitable cultures
- •Combined crop structure of listed companies
- •Ukraine`s 2012 harvest outlook
- •Valuation
- •Valuation summary
- •Valuation summary
- •Asset-based approach
- •Asset-based valuation
- •Valuation premium/discount summary
- •Location matters: Value of land by region
- •Yields efficiency comparing to benchmark region
- •Cost efficiency
- •Adding supplementary businesses
- •Valuation summary for other assets
- •Cost of equity assumptions
- •Model assumptions
- •Landbank growth capped at 30%
- •Crop structure
- •Biological revaluation (ias 41) excluded
- •Land ownership
- •Company Profiles Agroton a high cost producer
- •Investment case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Agroton in six charts
- •Operati
- •Industrial Milk Company Corn story
- •Investment case
- •A focus on the corn explains high margins
- •Location favourable for corn
- •Well on track with ipo proceeds
- •Weak ebitda margin in 2012 explained by non-cash items
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro On the road to space/Not ready to be public
- •Investment Case
- •A 5x yoy boost in total assets looks strange to us
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro in six charts
- •Mcb Agricole Acquisition target with lack of positives for minorities
- •Investment Case
- •Inventories balance, usd mln
- •Overview of acquisitions of public farming companies in Ukraine
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement, usd mln
- •Mcb Agricole in six charts
- •Mriya Too sweet to be true
- •Investment Case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Mriya in six charts
- •Sintal Agriculture
- •Investment Case
- •25% Yoy cost reduction in 2011 should improve margins
- •Irrigation is a growth option
- •Inventory balance, usd mln
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Sintal Agriculture in six charts
- •Astarta Sugar maker
- •Kernel Grain trader actively integrating upstream
- •Poultry producer
- •Appendices Land value
- •Current landowner income capitalization model
- •Farmer income capitalization model
- •Normative value
- •Biological asset revaluation
- •How do we adjust the income statement to be on a cost basis?
- •Ias 41 application summary
- •Appendix: Crop production schedule Crop schedule, based on 2012 harvesting year
- •Investment ratings
- •Contacts
Investment Case
We initiate coverage of KSG Agro with a HOLD recommendation and target price of PLN 27.9/share, upside of TT%. We believe the company’s cost advantage to peers, which allowed it to post higher than market average margins, is priced in to the company’s share price. At the same time, management’s presentation as a growth story is chaotic and unrealistic, in our view and justifies a HOLD recommendation even at current upside levels.
Lowest cost producer
With an average USD 115-228 spent per ha in 2010 (the latest reporting period), KSG Agro was the lowest cost producer among Ukrainian agriculture names (though we failed to find a meaningful explanation why, especially given that 2010 costs were below 2009, unlike for its peers). This allowed the company to post the highest EBITDA margins in the sector, 44%-64% in 2009-10. In terms of crop yields, KSG Agro is generally in line with its region.
Though there is inherently no way to check KSG Agro production costs, we note that the story of low pre-IPO costs resembles the IPO wrapping shown by Agroton, which showed a lowest production costs in IPO prospectus which in later years changed to one of the highest in the sector.
Production costs, USD/ha, 2010, sunflower |
|
wheat |
|
barley |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Company data, State Statistics Committee of Ukraine |
Located in sunflower-favourable region, meaning high-risk high-return operations
Of the company’s 59 ths ha, 52 are located in Dnipropetrovsk region, which has the highest share of sunflowers, one of the top-3 crops grown in Ukraine by profitability, in its crop structure (29% vs. Ukraine’s average of 16%). The region’s yields are generally on par with Ukraine’s average for sunflower, wheat and rapeseed, but 33% lower for corn and soybean. For the last four years, KSG Agro has had a heavy bias toward sunflowers: it accounted for 46%, 38%, 61% and 37% of planted land, well above the region’s average and normal crop rotation practices. We attribute this to the company’s focus on profitability ahead of its IPO in May 2011 and expect a decrease of sunflower share in crop structure to 25% in future periods.
Only listed company to invest in pork, though the project is larger than the company itself
With its purchase of a 50% stake in a large underutilized Soviet-era pig farm in Dnipropetrovsk region, KSG Agro became the first listed Ukrainian company to invest in pork. While we generally believe the pork story is next-it for Ukraine, we note this farm requires a complete renovation, with CapEx estimated by the company at up to USD 100 mln (3.5x and 7.0x larger than our estimate for KSG Agro’s revenues and EBITDA in 2012, respectively). At this point, we do not account for this project in our valuation. We deem this acquisition more a mechanism for financial engineering than an investment due to the unrealistic amount of CapEx required; the company’s guidance that this acquisition will add USD 5 mln to its bottom line solely on revaluation supports this view.
Scattered and overambitious growth strategy
KSG Agro announced ambitious plans to grow its landbank 5x within five years at IPO in May 2011: from 33 ths to 150 ths ha. As of April 2012, KSG Agro had increased its landbank to 59 ths ha and the most recent guidance aims for leasing 110 ths ha by yearend, a highly ambitious figure given the company’s cash position of USD 5.5 mln at end-2011. Notably only half a year since its IPO, KSG Agro added chaos to its already aggressive growth strategy: the company acquired a 50% stake in a Soviet-era pig-farm in Dnipropetrovsk region in October 2011 and initiated construction of a 60-90 kt pellet production plant in January 2012.
Business directions |
|
|
Announced projects |
CapEx required, (our estimate) |
Status |
Landbank expansion from 33 ths ha to 160 ths ha within three years |
USD 50 - 130 mln |
25 ths ha acquired |
Acquisition of the pork production facility |
USD 40-100 mln |
A 50% stake in old facility acquired in October 2011, no update on the modernization plans |
Pellet production plant |
USD 5 - 20 mln |
Signed a letter of intent with Polish Energy Partners, production at the facility should commence already in 2012 |
Silo construction |
USD 4 - 25 mln |
Nothing clear |
Machinery purchase |
USD 25 mln within three years |
Attracted USD 10.9 mln loan from Deer Credit |
Vegetables production |
USD 1 - 10 mln |
Nothing clear |
Source: Company data, Concorde Capital