
- •Investment Case 11
- •Valuation summary 37
- •Investment case 53
- •Investment Case
- •Companies Compared Stock data
- •Key metrics
- •Per ha comparison
- •Management credibility
- •Market Overview Summary
- •Ukraine in global context Ukraine produces 2-3% of world soft commodities
- •Sunflower oil, corn, wheat, barley and rapeseed are Ukraine’s key soft commodities to export
- •Ukraine is 8th in arable land globally
- •Key inputs used in crop farming Ukraine`s climate favorable for low-cost agriculture
- •Soil fertility map
- •Machinery use far below developed countries
- •Land trade moratorium makes more benefits
- •Fertilizer use
- •Inputs prices: lease cost is Ukraine’s key cost advantage
- •Case study: Production costs in Ukraine vs. Brazil for corn and soybean
- •Farming Efficiency Ukrainian crop yields lag the eu and us, on par with Argentina and Brazil, above Russia’s
- •5Y average yields, t/ha and their respective 10y cagRs
- •Yields at a premium in Ukraine on the company level
- •Growth Growth should come from yield improvement, crop structure reshuffle and acreage increase
- •Crop structure is gradually shifting to more profitable cultures
- •Combined crop structure of listed companies
- •Ukraine`s 2012 harvest outlook
- •Valuation
- •Valuation summary
- •Valuation summary
- •Asset-based approach
- •Asset-based valuation
- •Valuation premium/discount summary
- •Location matters: Value of land by region
- •Yields efficiency comparing to benchmark region
- •Cost efficiency
- •Adding supplementary businesses
- •Valuation summary for other assets
- •Cost of equity assumptions
- •Model assumptions
- •Landbank growth capped at 30%
- •Crop structure
- •Biological revaluation (ias 41) excluded
- •Land ownership
- •Company Profiles Agroton a high cost producer
- •Investment case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Agroton in six charts
- •Operati
- •Industrial Milk Company Corn story
- •Investment case
- •A focus on the corn explains high margins
- •Location favourable for corn
- •Well on track with ipo proceeds
- •Weak ebitda margin in 2012 explained by non-cash items
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro On the road to space/Not ready to be public
- •Investment Case
- •A 5x yoy boost in total assets looks strange to us
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro in six charts
- •Mcb Agricole Acquisition target with lack of positives for minorities
- •Investment Case
- •Inventories balance, usd mln
- •Overview of acquisitions of public farming companies in Ukraine
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement, usd mln
- •Mcb Agricole in six charts
- •Mriya Too sweet to be true
- •Investment Case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Mriya in six charts
- •Sintal Agriculture
- •Investment Case
- •25% Yoy cost reduction in 2011 should improve margins
- •Irrigation is a growth option
- •Inventory balance, usd mln
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Sintal Agriculture in six charts
- •Astarta Sugar maker
- •Kernel Grain trader actively integrating upstream
- •Poultry producer
- •Appendices Land value
- •Current landowner income capitalization model
- •Farmer income capitalization model
- •Normative value
- •Biological asset revaluation
- •How do we adjust the income statement to be on a cost basis?
- •Ias 41 application summary
- •Appendix: Crop production schedule Crop schedule, based on 2012 harvesting year
- •Investment ratings
- •Contacts
Well on track with ipo proceeds
We deem IMC post-IPO development as one of the most successful among Ukrainian farming companies and well consistent with its pre-IPO commitments.
Pre-IPO intentions Targeted USD 83.4 mln in proceeds at the maximum price |
Post IPO Net proceeds of USD 24.4 mln |
Intended use of proceeds |
Post-IPO developments |
88 ths ha landbank increase |
45 ths ha landbank increase |
Construction of 80 kt potato storage facilities |
13.5 kt potato storage constructed |
Construction of 130 kt grain storage facilities |
131 kt grain storage facilities acquired |
Investments in machinery & equipment
|
USD 9.1 mln cash outflow in PP&E within 2Q11 – 1Q12 (includes potato storages) |
Working capital |
n/a |
Source: Company data, Concorde Capital calculations
Weak ebitda margin in 2012 explained by non-cash items
Industrial Milk Company posted 20% EBITDA margin in 2012, net of biological revaluations, 25pp down yoy. The most of decline is explained by non-cash items in other operating loss line: (1) impairment of the fair value of agricultural produce (which is a non-cash item purely due to the fact that agricultural produce was booked at market prices at the moment of harvesting and prices has decreased until the year end) and (2) lower VAT grants in 2012 due to the management decision to postpone sales to 2012 (where we expect the company to receive respective VAT grants). A 16% yoy drop in revenues in 2012 is purely explained by management decision to postpone sales of majority of 2011 harvest crops to the next year (only 1/3 of corn harvested in 2011 has been sold).
Key financials, USD mln
|
2010 |
2011 |
2012E |
2013E |
Revenue |
34.8 |
29.1 |
63.6 |
90.9 |
yoy |
72% |
-16% |
119% |
43% |
Gross profit |
17.4 |
13.5 |
36.2 |
44.7 |
mgn |
50% |
46% |
57% |
49% |
EBITDA |
15.6 |
5.7 |
32.1 |
39.2 |
mgn |
45% |
20% |
50% |
43% |
Note: All figures are net of remeasurement of agricultural produce and revaluation of biological assets
Source: Company data, Concorde Capital projections
Valuation
We rate IMC as BUY with 12M target price of PLN 17.5/share, an upside of TT%, based on 50/50 blend of DCF and asset-based valuation. The stock is undervalued both by DCF model (implied fair value of PLN 15.2/share at wacc of 19%) and asset-based valuation (PLN 22.2/share at target EV/ha of USD 2,300/ha and USD 55 mln for complimentary business).
Risks
The ability to integrate doubled landbank without margin destruction is a key risk for the company. Other risks include ones applicable to all companies in the universe: poor liquidity, reliance on commodity prices, regulatory changes.