
- •Investment Case 11
- •Valuation summary 37
- •Investment case 53
- •Investment Case
- •Companies Compared Stock data
- •Key metrics
- •Per ha comparison
- •Management credibility
- •Market Overview Summary
- •Ukraine in global context Ukraine produces 2-3% of world soft commodities
- •Sunflower oil, corn, wheat, barley and rapeseed are Ukraine’s key soft commodities to export
- •Ukraine is 8th in arable land globally
- •Key inputs used in crop farming Ukraine`s climate favorable for low-cost agriculture
- •Soil fertility map
- •Machinery use far below developed countries
- •Land trade moratorium makes more benefits
- •Fertilizer use
- •Inputs prices: lease cost is Ukraine’s key cost advantage
- •Case study: Production costs in Ukraine vs. Brazil for corn and soybean
- •Farming Efficiency Ukrainian crop yields lag the eu and us, on par with Argentina and Brazil, above Russia’s
- •5Y average yields, t/ha and their respective 10y cagRs
- •Yields at a premium in Ukraine on the company level
- •Growth Growth should come from yield improvement, crop structure reshuffle and acreage increase
- •Crop structure is gradually shifting to more profitable cultures
- •Combined crop structure of listed companies
- •Ukraine`s 2012 harvest outlook
- •Valuation
- •Valuation summary
- •Valuation summary
- •Asset-based approach
- •Asset-based valuation
- •Valuation premium/discount summary
- •Location matters: Value of land by region
- •Yields efficiency comparing to benchmark region
- •Cost efficiency
- •Adding supplementary businesses
- •Valuation summary for other assets
- •Cost of equity assumptions
- •Model assumptions
- •Landbank growth capped at 30%
- •Crop structure
- •Biological revaluation (ias 41) excluded
- •Land ownership
- •Company Profiles Agroton a high cost producer
- •Investment case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Agroton in six charts
- •Operati
- •Industrial Milk Company Corn story
- •Investment case
- •A focus on the corn explains high margins
- •Location favourable for corn
- •Well on track with ipo proceeds
- •Weak ebitda margin in 2012 explained by non-cash items
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro On the road to space/Not ready to be public
- •Investment Case
- •A 5x yoy boost in total assets looks strange to us
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro in six charts
- •Mcb Agricole Acquisition target with lack of positives for minorities
- •Investment Case
- •Inventories balance, usd mln
- •Overview of acquisitions of public farming companies in Ukraine
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement, usd mln
- •Mcb Agricole in six charts
- •Mriya Too sweet to be true
- •Investment Case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Mriya in six charts
- •Sintal Agriculture
- •Investment Case
- •25% Yoy cost reduction in 2011 should improve margins
- •Irrigation is a growth option
- •Inventory balance, usd mln
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Sintal Agriculture in six charts
- •Astarta Sugar maker
- •Kernel Grain trader actively integrating upstream
- •Poultry producer
- •Appendices Land value
- •Current landowner income capitalization model
- •Farmer income capitalization model
- •Normative value
- •Biological asset revaluation
- •How do we adjust the income statement to be on a cost basis?
- •Ias 41 application summary
- •Appendix: Crop production schedule Crop schedule, based on 2012 harvesting year
- •Investment ratings
- •Contacts
Investment case
We initiate coverage on Industrial Milk Company (IMC PW) with a BUY recommendation and 12M target price of PLN 17.5 per share, implying an upside of 76%. We like IMC`s location, operating efficiency, focus on higher-margin corn and execution of IPO commitments, while at the same time we are somewhat concerned on the future ability to achieve selling price premiums.
A focus on the corn explains high margins
Around of the half of the IMC`s acreage was devoted to the corn cultivation during the last four years and company devoted 54% of the land in 2012 for this crop. A focus on the corn pay backs: prices for the corn are comparable to the wheat, but yields per ha were 1.6x higher for corn that for wheat (Ukraine`s average for five years), more than compensating for the higher required costs. IMC posted the highest corn yields among listed pure farmers: 5.9 t/ha in 2010 and 8.0 t/ha in 2011. Thanks to that IMC earned the highest gross profit per ha of USD 750/ha, we estimate.
Location favourable for corn
We find the location of IMC`s landbank (roughly equally split over Poltava, Chernihiv and Sumy regions) as the best among listed pure farmers if measured by average profit per ha (see our Valuation section for details). While Poltava region delivers premium yields for most of crops grown in Ukraine, Chernihiv region is favourable for corn and potatoes production. Sumy region`s yields are similar to Ukraine averages while crop structure is slightly shifted to the corn.
Corn yields, mt/ha |
|
Sunflower yields, mt/ha |
|
Wheat yields, mt/ha |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Concorde Capital estimates |
|
Source: Concorde Capital estimates |
|
Source: Concorde Capital estimates |
A high-cost-high-yields producer
IMC applies the highest per ha costs among Ukrainian listed pure farmers, achieving the highest revenues from the hectare. This bodes into well-paid strategy with estimated gross margin of 56%-57% in 2010-11.
The ability to keep efficiency is yet to see
IMC expanded its landbank from 38 ths ha from IPO in April 2011 to 83 ths ha as of May 2012, the fastest post-IPO growth within a year among Ukrainian companies. We yet to see whether the company will be able to show the similarly high crop yields on acquired land as it posted on the old land.
Self-sufficient in storage
The company’s storage facilities amount to 303 kt, 1.1x above the total crops we expect company to harvest this year and second-highest absolute figure among listed pure farmers.
The ability to keep high corn selling price is questionable
IMC derived 3/5 of its revenues in 2011 from the sale of corn, which company was able to deliver at average price of USD 263/t, or 1.9x higher than what we calculate was the selling price for an average farmer. The company explains the premium by the fact that corn contract terms were agreed on the forward basis and company executed delivery to the port. We treat this price as one-off and expect the sale terms to converge to market averages plus 10% (premium justified by the presence of the own storage facilities).