
- •Investment Case 11
- •Valuation summary 37
- •Investment case 53
- •Investment Case
- •Companies Compared Stock data
- •Key metrics
- •Per ha comparison
- •Management credibility
- •Market Overview Summary
- •Ukraine in global context Ukraine produces 2-3% of world soft commodities
- •Sunflower oil, corn, wheat, barley and rapeseed are Ukraine’s key soft commodities to export
- •Ukraine is 8th in arable land globally
- •Key inputs used in crop farming Ukraine`s climate favorable for low-cost agriculture
- •Soil fertility map
- •Machinery use far below developed countries
- •Land trade moratorium makes more benefits
- •Fertilizer use
- •Inputs prices: lease cost is Ukraine’s key cost advantage
- •Case study: Production costs in Ukraine vs. Brazil for corn and soybean
- •Farming Efficiency Ukrainian crop yields lag the eu and us, on par with Argentina and Brazil, above Russia’s
- •5Y average yields, t/ha and their respective 10y cagRs
- •Yields at a premium in Ukraine on the company level
- •Growth Growth should come from yield improvement, crop structure reshuffle and acreage increase
- •Crop structure is gradually shifting to more profitable cultures
- •Combined crop structure of listed companies
- •Ukraine`s 2012 harvest outlook
- •Valuation
- •Valuation summary
- •Valuation summary
- •Asset-based approach
- •Asset-based valuation
- •Valuation premium/discount summary
- •Location matters: Value of land by region
- •Yields efficiency comparing to benchmark region
- •Cost efficiency
- •Adding supplementary businesses
- •Valuation summary for other assets
- •Cost of equity assumptions
- •Model assumptions
- •Landbank growth capped at 30%
- •Crop structure
- •Biological revaluation (ias 41) excluded
- •Land ownership
- •Company Profiles Agroton a high cost producer
- •Investment case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Agroton in six charts
- •Operati
- •Industrial Milk Company Corn story
- •Investment case
- •A focus on the corn explains high margins
- •Location favourable for corn
- •Well on track with ipo proceeds
- •Weak ebitda margin in 2012 explained by non-cash items
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro On the road to space/Not ready to be public
- •Investment Case
- •A 5x yoy boost in total assets looks strange to us
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro in six charts
- •Mcb Agricole Acquisition target with lack of positives for minorities
- •Investment Case
- •Inventories balance, usd mln
- •Overview of acquisitions of public farming companies in Ukraine
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement, usd mln
- •Mcb Agricole in six charts
- •Mriya Too sweet to be true
- •Investment Case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Mriya in six charts
- •Sintal Agriculture
- •Investment Case
- •25% Yoy cost reduction in 2011 should improve margins
- •Irrigation is a growth option
- •Inventory balance, usd mln
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Sintal Agriculture in six charts
- •Astarta Sugar maker
- •Kernel Grain trader actively integrating upstream
- •Poultry producer
- •Appendices Land value
- •Current landowner income capitalization model
- •Farmer income capitalization model
- •Normative value
- •Biological asset revaluation
- •How do we adjust the income statement to be on a cost basis?
- •Ias 41 application summary
- •Appendix: Crop production schedule Crop schedule, based on 2012 harvesting year
- •Investment ratings
- •Contacts
Cost of equity assumptions
We apply our house approach to cost of equity calculation, summing up country risk (10Y government bond yield of 9%), an equity risk premium of 6% and company-specific premiums. Since farming is a classic commodity business with output prices more volatile than inputs, the minimum company-specific premium we see for the sector is 3 pp. To all companies covered in this report we add another 2pp to account for company-specific risks: Agroton (risk of use of proceeds), Industrial Milk Company (little track record, partial disclosure), KSG Agro (unclear strategy, little track record, risk of cost appreciation), MCB Agricole (risk of the majority shareholder change), Mriya (reliance on related parties) and Sintal Agriculture (negative track record).
Cost of equity by company |
|
Source: Concorde Capital estimates |
Model assumptions
Company-specific assumptions and DCF output are given in the company profiles section of this report. Below are details of our approach to forecasting key operating parameters:
Landbank growth capped at 30%
We cap landbank expansion for all companies at 30% from current levels, assuming USD 400-450/ha cost of lease rights acquisition. For MCB Agricole, Sintal and Agroton, we assume close to zero landbank growth, as we believe MCB Agricole has no resources to expand while the latter two have recently expanded and will likely focus on integration, in our view.
Crop prices
We base our 2012 crop price forecasts on current market levels and apply 2% dollar inflation for future years.
Crop price base assumptions, USD/t |
||||||||||||
|
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
Wheat |
100 |
142 |
158 |
175 |
179 |
182 |
186 |
189 |
193 |
197 |
201 |
205 |
Corn |
117 |
150 |
142 |
167 |
170 |
173 |
177 |
180 |
184 |
188 |
191 |
195 |
Barley |
79 |
158 |
154 |
167 |
170 |
173 |
177 |
180 |
184 |
188 |
191 |
195 |
Rapeseed |
285 |
358 |
429 |
486 |
496 |
505 |
516 |
526 |
536 |
547 |
558 |
569 |
Soy |
350 |
333 |
317 |
398 |
405 |
414 |
422 |
430 |
439 |
448 |
457 |
466 |
Sunflower |
288 |
442 |
358 |
442 |
451 |
460 |
469 |
478 |
488 |
497 |
507 |
517 |
Sugar beet |
|
|
45 |
40 |
41 |
42 |
42 |
43 |
44 |
45 |
46 |
47 |
Source: APK-Inform, Concorde Capital
To these prices we apply company-specific premiums/discounts, largely based on historical selling prices in order to account for advantages due to ownership of storage facilities and/or higher crop quality.
Crop yield growth
We assume a 15% yoy decline in crop yields in 2012, as the positive weather effect of 2011 will likely disappear and cold weather during the winter will have some impact, and 10% growth in 2013 (except somewhat lower figures for rapeseed, sunflower and barley). For latter periods, we assume 2% growth per annum, though even this leaves grain yields far below EU levels.
Yield, t/ha Wheat |
|
Corn |
|
Sunflower |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Company data for 2008-11, Concorde Capital projections for 2012-2020 |