- •Investment Case 11
- •Valuation summary 37
- •Investment case 53
- •Investment Case
- •Companies Compared Stock data
- •Key metrics
- •Per ha comparison
- •Management credibility
- •Market Overview Summary
- •Ukraine in global context Ukraine produces 2-3% of world soft commodities
- •Sunflower oil, corn, wheat, barley and rapeseed are Ukraine’s key soft commodities to export
- •Ukraine is 8th in arable land globally
- •Key inputs used in crop farming Ukraine`s climate favorable for low-cost agriculture
- •Soil fertility map
- •Machinery use far below developed countries
- •Land trade moratorium makes more benefits
- •Fertilizer use
- •Inputs prices: lease cost is Ukraine’s key cost advantage
- •Case study: Production costs in Ukraine vs. Brazil for corn and soybean
- •Farming Efficiency Ukrainian crop yields lag the eu and us, on par with Argentina and Brazil, above Russia’s
- •5Y average yields, t/ha and their respective 10y cagRs
- •Yields at a premium in Ukraine on the company level
- •Growth Growth should come from yield improvement, crop structure reshuffle and acreage increase
- •Crop structure is gradually shifting to more profitable cultures
- •Combined crop structure of listed companies
- •Ukraine`s 2012 harvest outlook
- •Valuation
- •Valuation summary
- •Valuation summary
- •Asset-based approach
- •Asset-based valuation
- •Valuation premium/discount summary
- •Location matters: Value of land by region
- •Yields efficiency comparing to benchmark region
- •Cost efficiency
- •Adding supplementary businesses
- •Valuation summary for other assets
- •Cost of equity assumptions
- •Model assumptions
- •Landbank growth capped at 30%
- •Crop structure
- •Biological revaluation (ias 41) excluded
- •Land ownership
- •Company Profiles Agroton a high cost producer
- •Investment case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Agroton in six charts
- •Operati
- •Industrial Milk Company Corn story
- •Investment case
- •A focus on the corn explains high margins
- •Location favourable for corn
- •Well on track with ipo proceeds
- •Weak ebitda margin in 2012 explained by non-cash items
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro On the road to space/Not ready to be public
- •Investment Case
- •A 5x yoy boost in total assets looks strange to us
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro in six charts
- •Mcb Agricole Acquisition target with lack of positives for minorities
- •Investment Case
- •Inventories balance, usd mln
- •Overview of acquisitions of public farming companies in Ukraine
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement, usd mln
- •Mcb Agricole in six charts
- •Mriya Too sweet to be true
- •Investment Case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Mriya in six charts
- •Sintal Agriculture
- •Investment Case
- •25% Yoy cost reduction in 2011 should improve margins
- •Irrigation is a growth option
- •Inventory balance, usd mln
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Sintal Agriculture in six charts
- •Astarta Sugar maker
- •Kernel Grain trader actively integrating upstream
- •Poultry producer
- •Appendices Land value
- •Current landowner income capitalization model
- •Farmer income capitalization model
- •Normative value
- •Biological asset revaluation
- •How do we adjust the income statement to be on a cost basis?
- •Ias 41 application summary
- •Appendix: Crop production schedule Crop schedule, based on 2012 harvesting year
- •Investment ratings
- •Contacts
Location matters: Value of land by region
We attempt to capture differences in land location, probably the most important factor for farming businesses anywhere in the world, with a series of premiums and discounts applied to a base Ukraine`s EV/ha per region. We work with region-level data (for Ukraine’s 25 regions, average size of 24.1 sq km), assuming land is identical within the region.
We find the two most important factors that determine profitability of location:
The ability to achieve higher-than-average yields. Based on five-year average data on yields for each region, data on costs per ha in 2010 (both State Statistics Committee of Ukraine) and APK-Inform crop prices for 2010, we calculate each region’s average profits per ha for key crops: corn, sunflower, wheat and sugar beets.
The ability to focus on growth for the highest margin crops: sugar beets, oilseeds, corn. We calculate the weighted average profit per ha for each region, dividing all crops in four groups: corn, sugar beets, oilseeds (assuming all oilseeds have the same profit per ha as sunflowers, as cost data for other crops is not available) and non-corn grains (assuming profit is the same as for wheat).
Average gross profit*, USD/ha, by components |
|
*Based on 5Y average yields for region, average costs/ha and selling prices for 2010. Source: State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, Concorde Capital estimates |
Dividing each region`s average gross profit per ha to Ukraine`s average, we arrive at a premium/discount for each region. We apply this premium to the target of USD 1,600/ha (see details for how we arrive at this figure in Appendix).
Target EV/ha per region, USD
S
ource:
Concorde Capital
Yields efficiency comparing to benchmark region
We found that in most cases the crop yield premiums listed Ukrainian companies report to the Ukrainian average are related more to their region of operations than to the real efficiency of the company itself. Since we capture the quality of location separately, to evaluate efficiency we compare reported yields to their region of operations’ average for 2010-11.
Benchmark region yields for each company are based on a weighted average for each region of operations, with weights proportional to landbank distribution as of end-2011. We then compare each company’s yields to the benchmarks and calculate an average premium, weighting for crop mix (average for 2010-11) and relative crop importance for profitability (2.0 for sugar beets, 1.5 for corn and oilseeds, 1.0 for wheat, 0.5 for barley).
Yield premiums/discounts to benchmark region averages, 2010-11 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Corn |
Soybean |
Sunflower |
Rapeseed |
Barley |
Wheat |
Sugar beets |
Weighted average |
|
Agroton |
10% |
|
36% |
-18% |
-5% |
24% |
|
27% |
|
Astarta |
30% |
8% |
3% |
|
22% |
21% |
30% |
22% |
|
Industrial Milk Company |
27% |
19% |
26% |
-32% |
-50% |
27% |
|
25% |
|
Kernel |
1% |
-6% |
-1% |
-4% |
-7% |
-3% |
-20% |
-5% |
|
KSG Agro |
|
-11% |
14% |
-64% |
5% |
1% |
|
6% |
|
MCB Agricole |
-2% |
-11% |
16% |
18% |
19% |
2% |
|
9% |
|
MHP |
28% |
|
45% |
59% |
|
40% |
|
35% |
|
Mriya |
-10% |
-57% |
|
-4% |
-21% |
11% |
33% |
11% |
|
Sintal |
-9% |
-34% |
18% |
28% |
6% |
1% |
17% |
5% |
|
Source: Company data, UkrStat, Concorde Capital calculations
Our approach indicates Agroton, Astarta, Industrial Milk Company and MHP are the most efficient in terms of delivering higher yields vs. their region’s average, while Kernel is least efficient and the only underperformer.
