
- •Investment Case 11
- •Valuation summary 37
- •Investment case 53
- •Investment Case
- •Companies Compared Stock data
- •Key metrics
- •Per ha comparison
- •Management credibility
- •Market Overview Summary
- •Ukraine in global context Ukraine produces 2-3% of world soft commodities
- •Sunflower oil, corn, wheat, barley and rapeseed are Ukraine’s key soft commodities to export
- •Ukraine is 8th in arable land globally
- •Key inputs used in crop farming Ukraine`s climate favorable for low-cost agriculture
- •Soil fertility map
- •Machinery use far below developed countries
- •Land trade moratorium makes more benefits
- •Fertilizer use
- •Inputs prices: lease cost is Ukraine’s key cost advantage
- •Case study: Production costs in Ukraine vs. Brazil for corn and soybean
- •Farming Efficiency Ukrainian crop yields lag the eu and us, on par with Argentina and Brazil, above Russia’s
- •5Y average yields, t/ha and their respective 10y cagRs
- •Yields at a premium in Ukraine on the company level
- •Growth Growth should come from yield improvement, crop structure reshuffle and acreage increase
- •Crop structure is gradually shifting to more profitable cultures
- •Combined crop structure of listed companies
- •Ukraine`s 2012 harvest outlook
- •Valuation
- •Valuation summary
- •Valuation summary
- •Asset-based approach
- •Asset-based valuation
- •Valuation premium/discount summary
- •Location matters: Value of land by region
- •Yields efficiency comparing to benchmark region
- •Cost efficiency
- •Adding supplementary businesses
- •Valuation summary for other assets
- •Cost of equity assumptions
- •Model assumptions
- •Landbank growth capped at 30%
- •Crop structure
- •Biological revaluation (ias 41) excluded
- •Land ownership
- •Company Profiles Agroton a high cost producer
- •Investment case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Agroton in six charts
- •Operati
- •Industrial Milk Company Corn story
- •Investment case
- •A focus on the corn explains high margins
- •Location favourable for corn
- •Well on track with ipo proceeds
- •Weak ebitda margin in 2012 explained by non-cash items
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro On the road to space/Not ready to be public
- •Investment Case
- •A 5x yoy boost in total assets looks strange to us
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro in six charts
- •Mcb Agricole Acquisition target with lack of positives for minorities
- •Investment Case
- •Inventories balance, usd mln
- •Overview of acquisitions of public farming companies in Ukraine
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement, usd mln
- •Mcb Agricole in six charts
- •Mriya Too sweet to be true
- •Investment Case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Mriya in six charts
- •Sintal Agriculture
- •Investment Case
- •25% Yoy cost reduction in 2011 should improve margins
- •Irrigation is a growth option
- •Inventory balance, usd mln
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Sintal Agriculture in six charts
- •Astarta Sugar maker
- •Kernel Grain trader actively integrating upstream
- •Poultry producer
- •Appendices Land value
- •Current landowner income capitalization model
- •Farmer income capitalization model
- •Normative value
- •Biological asset revaluation
- •How do we adjust the income statement to be on a cost basis?
- •Ias 41 application summary
- •Appendix: Crop production schedule Crop schedule, based on 2012 harvesting year
- •Investment ratings
- •Contacts
Crop structure is gradually shifting to more profitable cultures
Ukraine`s climate and soil quality have historically made wheat and barley the most popular crops, with sunflower, potatoes and sugar beets second order cultures. Within the last decade, farmers have started to increase the share of more profitable crops: corn and sunflower shares has grown while soybeans and rapeseed have successfully emerged.
Ukraine`s harvest area structure |
|
Source: State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, USDA, Concorde Capital calculations |
The crop mix of listed Ukrainian companies is shifted toward more profitable crops, but is far from the structure of their Brazilian and Argentinian peers. Corn accounted for 18% of the combined area harvested for Ukrainian listed companies vs. 11% on average for Ukraine (vs. 11% and 25%, respectively, for Brazilian and Argentinean peers), while oilseeds accounted to 29% of Ukrainian listed companies acreage vs. 24% on average for Ukraine and 51% for Brazilian and 46% for Argentinean listed companies.
Combined crop structure of listed companies
Ukraine |
Russia |
Brazil |
Argentina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Based on 2010-11 reports of Agroton, Sintal Agriculture, MCB Agricole, Mriya, Industrial Milk Company, KSG Agro, Astarta, Kernel, MHP, Alpcot Agro, Black Earth Farming, Trigon Agri, SLC Agricola, Brasilagro, Cresud, Adecoagro. Source: Company data
|
Ukraine`s 2012 harvest outlook
We expect crop yields will decrease by 5-20% yoy in 2012, as we do not expect the positive weather effect observed in 2011 to repeat this year. The cold weather in winter with limited snow added some negatives, killing an estimated 20% of winter grains and 40% of winter rapeseed, or 9% of the total expected acreage under grains and oilseeds. We expect corn, sunflower and soybean will add in acreage on the ground of killed winter wheat and rapeseed. As a result, we expect total grain production in Ukraine at 50 mln mt, down 11% yoy and oilseed production at 13 mln mt, flat yoy.
Area under crop, mln ha |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: APK-Inform, Concorde Capital projections |
|
Source: APK-Inform, State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, Concorde Capital projections |
Production, mln mt |
|
2012 vs. 2011, yoy |
|
|
|
Source: APK-Inform, Concorde Capital projections |
|
Source: APK-Inform, State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, Concorde Capital projections |
Ukraine`s grain supply-demand balance, mln mt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006/07 |
2007/08 |
2008/09 |
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
2012/13 |
Initial stocks |
4.8 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
4.4 |
3.2 |
4.5 |
13.1 |
Gross harvest |
34.3 |
29.3 |
51.0 |
46.0 |
39.3 |
56.7 |
50.3 |
Import |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Total supply |
39.3 |
33.0 |
54.7 |
50.5 |
42.6 |
61.4 |
63.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumption |
25.7 |
25.2 |
27.1 |
26.4 |
25.8 |
26.4 |
26.4 |
food |
5.7 |
6.1 |
6.2 |
5.9 |
5.7 |
5.7 |
5.7 |
feed |
14.7 |
14.1 |
14.8 |
14.8 |
14.9 |
15.0 |
15.2 |
seeds |
2.6 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
losses |
1.4 |
1.2 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
1.4 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
other |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
Export |
9.8 |
4.2 |
23.0 |
20.9 |
12.3 |
21.8 |
30.5 |
Total utilization |
35.5 |
29.4 |
50.1 |
47.3 |
38.1 |
48.2 |
57.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending stocks |
3.8 |
3.6 |
4.6 |
3.2 |
4.5 |
13.1 |
6.6 |
as % of consumption |
15% |
14% |
17% |
12% |
18% |
50% |
25% |
Source: APK-Inform, Concorde Capital forecasts