
- •Investment Case 11
- •Valuation summary 37
- •Investment case 53
- •Investment Case
- •Companies Compared Stock data
- •Key metrics
- •Per ha comparison
- •Management credibility
- •Market Overview Summary
- •Ukraine in global context Ukraine produces 2-3% of world soft commodities
- •Sunflower oil, corn, wheat, barley and rapeseed are Ukraine’s key soft commodities to export
- •Ukraine is 8th in arable land globally
- •Key inputs used in crop farming Ukraine`s climate favorable for low-cost agriculture
- •Soil fertility map
- •Machinery use far below developed countries
- •Land trade moratorium makes more benefits
- •Fertilizer use
- •Inputs prices: lease cost is Ukraine’s key cost advantage
- •Case study: Production costs in Ukraine vs. Brazil for corn and soybean
- •Farming Efficiency Ukrainian crop yields lag the eu and us, on par with Argentina and Brazil, above Russia’s
- •5Y average yields, t/ha and their respective 10y cagRs
- •Yields at a premium in Ukraine on the company level
- •Growth Growth should come from yield improvement, crop structure reshuffle and acreage increase
- •Crop structure is gradually shifting to more profitable cultures
- •Combined crop structure of listed companies
- •Ukraine`s 2012 harvest outlook
- •Valuation
- •Valuation summary
- •Valuation summary
- •Asset-based approach
- •Asset-based valuation
- •Valuation premium/discount summary
- •Location matters: Value of land by region
- •Yields efficiency comparing to benchmark region
- •Cost efficiency
- •Adding supplementary businesses
- •Valuation summary for other assets
- •Cost of equity assumptions
- •Model assumptions
- •Landbank growth capped at 30%
- •Crop structure
- •Biological revaluation (ias 41) excluded
- •Land ownership
- •Company Profiles Agroton a high cost producer
- •Investment case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Agroton in six charts
- •Operati
- •Industrial Milk Company Corn story
- •Investment case
- •A focus on the corn explains high margins
- •Location favourable for corn
- •Well on track with ipo proceeds
- •Weak ebitda margin in 2012 explained by non-cash items
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro On the road to space/Not ready to be public
- •Investment Case
- •A 5x yoy boost in total assets looks strange to us
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Ksg Agro in six charts
- •Mcb Agricole Acquisition target with lack of positives for minorities
- •Investment Case
- •Inventories balance, usd mln
- •Overview of acquisitions of public farming companies in Ukraine
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement, usd mln
- •Mcb Agricole in six charts
- •Mriya Too sweet to be true
- •Investment Case
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Mriya in six charts
- •Sintal Agriculture
- •Investment Case
- •25% Yoy cost reduction in 2011 should improve margins
- •Irrigation is a growth option
- •Inventory balance, usd mln
- •Valuation
- •Valuation
- •Operating assumptions
- •Financials
- •Income statement*, usd mln
- •Sintal Agriculture in six charts
- •Astarta Sugar maker
- •Kernel Grain trader actively integrating upstream
- •Poultry producer
- •Appendices Land value
- •Current landowner income capitalization model
- •Farmer income capitalization model
- •Normative value
- •Biological asset revaluation
- •How do we adjust the income statement to be on a cost basis?
- •Ias 41 application summary
- •Appendix: Crop production schedule Crop schedule, based on 2012 harvesting year
- •Investment ratings
- •Contacts
5Y average yields, t/ha and their respective 10y cagRs
Corn |
|
Wheat |
|
Barley |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: USDA |
|
Source: USDA |
|
Note: Barley planting in Argentina and Brazil is negligible. Source: USDA |
Sunflower |
|
Soybean |
|
Rapeseed |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: USDA |
|
Source: USDA |
|
Note: Rapeseed is not planted in Brazil and its planting in Argentina is negligible. Source: USDA |
Yields at a premium in Ukraine on the company level
Unlike on the country comparison, on a listed company-level, Ukrainian farmers broadly outperform their Brazilian, Russian and Argentinian peers on all crops except soybean.
Corn, yield, t/ha, 2010-11 avg |
|
Wheat, yield, t/ha, 2010-11 avg |
|
|
|
Source: Concorde Capital estimates |
|
Source: Concorde Capital estimates |
Soybean, yield, t/ha, 2010-11 avg |
|
Sunflower, yield, t/ha, 2010-11 avg |
|
|
|
Source: Concorde Capital estimates |
|
Source: Concorde Capital estimates |
Growth Growth should come from yield improvement, crop structure reshuffle and acreage increase
We see three key long-term drivers of farming in Ukraine, ranked by importance:
An increase in yields could be substantial, up to 2x in grains and 1.5x in oilseeds, if top performers like MHP and Astarta are taken into account. This could be achieved by the usage of modern machinery and an increase in fertilizer treatment, which both are a function of financing availability, a major problem for the average Ukrainian farmer.
A crop structure reshuffle toward more profitable cultures. Ukraine’s historical crop mix is slanted toward low-yield grains like barley and wheat, which if gradually replaced with corn, soybean, rapeseed and sunflower could increase both revenues and profits per ha. Though crop rotation requirements are often cited by farmers as a reason why there is so much wheat and barley sown, industry standards are changing globally and in a decade we could see a much larger share of profitable oilseeds and corn in Ukraine.
An acreage increase in Ukraine, driven by pasture conversion and the integration of non-farmed land, could increase arable land by 1/4 in the long-term. Market players estimate that non-farmed land requires about USD 300-500/ha in CapEx for most of areas (vs. USD 1,200-1,700/ha in Brazil’s Cerrado region), and USD 1,500/ha for those requiring irrigation.