Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Russian_CR_outlook-210119_watermark.pdf
Скачиваний:
4
Добавлен:
06.09.2019
Размер:
1.9 Mб
Скачать

vk.com/id446425943

Magnit is better positioned than X5 to realise headcount savings

For food retailers staff costs are the largest SG&A expense and hence highly important to their bottom-line profitability. Over the past few years the large food retailers have been able to keep salary expenses under control, to a large extent due to low inflation. We believe both X5 and Magnit still have room to optimise headcount costs, with Magnit better positioned in this regard. In terms of other cost items, it’s not obvious there are major differences in efficiency levels between X5 and Magnit.

Figure 48: Staff costs are the largest SG&A expense for the major food retailers and they have managed to keep them under control in recent years (payroll as % of revenue)

 

Lenta

 

X5

 

Magnit

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.0%

12.0%

10.0%

8.0%

6.0%

4.0%

2.0%

0.0%

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Source: Company data

Magnit has significantly optimised its headcount

While all major Russian retailers showed broadly stable or even slightly decreasing staff costs as a percentage of sales in recent years, the drivers of the improvement have varied. While X5’s average number of employees per m2 decreased only slightly over the past five years (48 in 2017 vs 53 in 2013), Magnit and Lenta showed significant improvements. Magnit’s comparable metric was at 48 in 2017 (vs 72 in 2013), with reduction achieved via both in-store and logistics operations optimisation.

Figure 49: Employees / ‘000sqm is going down

Employees / '000sqm

Magnit X5 Lenta

80.0

70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Source: Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

Renaissance Capital

21 January 2019

Russian retail

31

vk.com/id446425943

Renaissance Capital

21 January 2019

Russian retail

Figure 50: Retail employees / ‘000sqm

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 51: Logistics employees / ‘000sqm

 

 

 

 

 

60.0

 

 

 

Magnit

 

X5

 

Lenta

 

 

 

16.0

 

 

 

Magnit

 

X5

 

Lenta

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

2013

2014

 

2015

2016

2017

 

2012

2013

2014

 

2015

2016

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

X5 is likely to face elevated wage inflation in order to catch up with the market

Unlike its peers, X5 cost optimisation measures in recent years seem to have been more focused on salary rather than headcount, with its average expense per employee down by 13% between 2015 and 2017 vs growth at Magnit and Lenta. While this is partially due to X5’s more regionally-focused expansion (with the opposite true for Magnit), its salary levels appear to be visibly below its main peers based on open vacancies in the same cities. Thus, we expect higher wage inflation at X5 vs Magnit over the next year making it more difficult to achieve material profitability improvement via staff optimisation.

Figure 52: Unlike its peers, X5 saw declining average cost per employee in recent years (average monthly wage expenses per employee, RUB)

60,000

 

 

 

Magnit

 

X5

 

Lenta

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

2014

 

 

2015

2016

2017

Note: Based on IFRS financials.

Source: Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

32

vk.com/id446425943

Renaissance Capital

21 January 2019

Russian retail

Figure 53: Average cashier salary, RUB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 54: Average salary of store director, RUB

 

 

 

 

 

45,000

 

 

 

 

Pyaterochka

 

Magnit

 

 

 

 

140,000

 

 

 

 

Pyaterochka

 

Magnit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

120,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moscow

St-peterburg

Kazan'

 

Novosibirsk

Krasnodar

 

Ufa

Anapa

Penza

Kopesk

Tambov

Moscow

St-peterburg

Kazan'

Novosibirsk

Krasnodar

 

Ufa

Anapa

Penza

Kopesk

Tambov

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: hh.ru, Renaissance Capital estimates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: hh.ru, Renaissance Capital estimates

We see scope for both Magnit and X5 to further optimise their staff costs, with Magnit better positioned

The above said, a comparison of Russian largest retailers to international peers in terms of average number of employees per m2 suggests that there is still scope for optimisation at both Magnit and X5. However, given the higher level of salaries at Magnit in LfL locations, we think it is better positioned for staff cost optimisation over the next couple of years, with X5 potentially continuing to see pressure on its margin from employee expenses in the near term.

Figure 55: We think there is scope for headcount optimisation at both Magnit and X5 (employees / ‘000 m2)

Employees/'000sqm

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

Migros

BIM

Kroger's

Pick'n'pay

Biedronka

Lenta

Jeronimo Martins

Dino

Spar

Magnit

X5

Tesco

Sainsbury's

Source: Company data

33

vk.com/id446425943

Lenta’s outlook is challenging but we see value

Operating and financial trends at Lenta remain negative

As Magnit and X5 have significantly accelerated their expansion and widened their assortment, Lenta’s hypermarket offering has struggled, with LfL traffic consistently soft over the past two years. The proliferation of Magnit and X5 stores in convenient locations lessens the need for consumers to travel further to hypers and Magnit’s and X5’s expanded assortment means hypers’ value proposition needs to be extremely well defined. The net result for Lenta has been decelerating top-line growth, with profitability seeing a material deterioration, despite relatively favourable salary and rental trends across the market. With the company’s CEO and CFO having stepped down towards the end of 2018, near-term trading is unlikely to show any improvement, in our view, and we believe Lenta’s medium-term outlook is challenging.

Figure 56: Increased competition from alternative formats has contributed to soft LfL trends at Lenta

20.0%

 

 

 

Sales

Traffic

Basket

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-5.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Q13

3Q13

1Q14

3Q14

1Q15

3Q15

1Q16

3Q16

1Q17

3Q17

1Q18

3Q18

Source: Company data

Renaissance Capital

21 January 2019

Russian retail

Figure 57: Revenue growth has slowed substantially…

Figure 58: …and we expect margin pressure to continue in the medium term

 

Revenue, RUBbn

 

 

 

Growth, %

500.0

 

 

 

 

 

40%

45.0

450.0

 

 

 

 

 

35%

40.0

400.0

 

 

 

 

 

30%

35.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

350.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

25%

300.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.0

250.0

 

 

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

 

 

20.0

200.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.0

150.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10%

 

100.0

 

 

 

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50.0

 

 

 

 

 

5%

5.0

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

0%

0.0

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018E 2019E 2020E

 

 

Adj. EBITDA, RUBbn

 

 

 

Margin, %

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.0%

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018E 2019E 2020E

Source: Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

Source: Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

Lenta scale disadvantage vs X5 and Magnit will likely continue to worsen

Given its poor financial results and management changes we expect all aspects of Lenta’s strategy to be up for review, with significant changes possible. In hypers, some new stores are likely to be seeing lower-than-expected returns and/or cannibalising legacy stores to a greater extent than anticipated, hence we assume expansion will be scaled back again. Lenta’s supermarkets have not lived up to expectations and lack scale; expansion plans were cut back in 2018 and assuming no major ramp up this year it

34

vk.com/id446425943

Renaissance Capital

21 January 2019

Russian retail

will be difficult to build a sustainable business in the absence of meaningful M&A, in our view. The supermarket segment is highly competitive in Russia’s large cities and, in our view, it would be better if Lenta exited the format. Slower expansion will lead to a material improvement in cash generation and in 2019 we forecast Lenta to become free cash flow positive for the first time. However, limited expansion and sales growth below X5 and Magnit means that Lenta’s importance to suppliers is likely to deteriorate relative to the market leaders, with negative implications for purchasing terms and profitability. Deteriorating competitiveness is the major structural risk to Lenta’s business model, but if combined with another large player, purchasing terms, profitability, cash flow and competitiveness could all improve substantially, in our view.

Figure 59: Lenta’s gross margin is materially lower vs X5 and Magnit…

Figure 60: …due to worse purchasing terms

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin, %

 

 

 

 

 

 

CoGS as % of sales

25.0%

 

 

 

 

Lenta

 

X5

 

 

Magnit

 

 

76.0%

 

 

 

 

Lenta

 

X5

 

Magnit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

74.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

73.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

72.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

71.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

67.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

66.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lenta

 

 

X5

Magnit

 

Lenta

 

X5

Magnit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Data for 2018E.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Data for 2018E.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Renaissance Capital estimates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Renaissance Capital estimates

Lenta’s improving free cash flow points to significant value

In our base case, moderating space growth in 2019 and 2020 translates into free cash flow yields of 12% and 19%, respectively, and even considering the various risks we think this illustrates material value. Lenta has already announced a buy-back programme of up to RUB11.6bn and although liquidity and stock market rules mean this will be difficult to fully deploy, we believe a tender offer is also a possibility. Additional upside to profitability and cash generation could result from Lenta combining with another sizeable player, such as X5, Magnit, Auchan or even Azbuka Vkusa. This is not our base case for Lenta but given its valuation we think it competitors would be remiss not to at least consider this strategic route. For the publicly held companies, X5 and Magnit, beyond the financial rationale, the addition of Lenta stores to their networks could confirm overall market leadership and all the scale advantages this brings, additional regional scale in important geographies such as St Petersburg and Siberia and retail and marketing know-how, which could be leveraged across their own hyper and supermarket formats.

35

vk.com/id446425943

Renaissance Capital

21 January 2019

Russian retail

Figure 61: However, given the planned expansion slowdown…

 

Hyper openings

 

Super openings

 

 

 

 

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018E

2019E

2020E

Figure 62: …FCF is likely to improve, with yield increasing to 12% / 19% in 2019 / 2020

30.0

 

 

FCF, RUBbn

 

FCF yield

30.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

20.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

20.0%

10.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.0%

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0%

-10.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

-10.0%

-20.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

-20.0%

-30.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

-30.0%

-40.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

-40.0%

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018E 2019E 2020E

 

Source: Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates Source: Company data, Renaissance Capital estimates

Figure 63: …and we would see significant profitability and valuation upside if Lenta received purchasing terms of Magnit or X5, with FCF yield also looking highly attractive vs base case (TP sensitivity to long-term profitability assumptions)

 

 

Gross margin change vs base case

 

 

-1.50%

-0.75%

0.00%

0.75%

1.50%

TP, $/GDR

2.1

3.2

4.2

5.2

6.2

FCF yield 2019

6.5%

9.0%

11.5%

14.0%

16.5%

FCF yield 2020

13.6%

16.3%

19.0%

21.8%

24.5%

Source: Renaissance Capital estimates

The potential acquisition of Lenta with a substantial premium to its market price could be substantially earnings-accretive

Below we illustrate a hypothetical scenario of Lenta being combined with a large player such as Magnit and X5, estimating the possible impact on the acquirer’s earnings. For illustrative purposes only we consider an acquisition of Lenta with the following assumptions:

The addition of Lenta’s revenue to standalone Magnit’s and X5’s revenue, without any major portfolio reorganisation.

Extra 120-bpt / 20-bpt increases in gross margin for Lenta / standalone Magnit and X5 on the back of increased scale.

A 10% reduction in Lenta’s SG&A costs vs our base case.

Valuation of Lenta, implying a 30% premium to the current market cap, with the deal 100% financed by debt at 7.5% interest rate.

36

vk.com/id446425943

Renaissance Capital

21 January 2019

Russian retail

Figure 64: Key financial estimates of the combined company in a hypothetical scenario of Magnit acquiring Lenta

 

2018E

2019E

2020E

2021E

2022E

Revenue

1,647

1,848

2,037

2,219

2,389

Growth, %

 

12.2%

10.3%

8.9%

7.7%

Magnit

1,229

1,403

1,562

1,720

1,872

Lenta

418

445

475

499

517

Gross profit

388

442

486

529

570

Margin, %

23.5%

23.9%

23.9%

23.8%

23.9%

Magnit base case

298

339

378

416

453

Lenta base case

89

94

99

103

107

Extra gross profit

 

8.1

8.8

9.4

9.9

Extra gross margin (Magnit)

 

0.20%

0.20%

0.20%

0.20%

Extra gross margin (Lenta)

 

1.20%

1.20%

1.20%

1.20%

SG&A

263

283

309

342

371

as % of revenue

16.0%

15.3%

15.2%

15.4%

15.5%

Magnit base case

211

232

255

286

313

Lenta base case

52

56

60

62

65

Savings at Lenta

 

-6

-6

-6

-6

as % of Lenta's SG&A

 

10.0%

10.0%

10.0%

10.0%

EBITDA

125

159

177

187

199

Margin, %

7.6%

8.6%

8.7%

8.4%

8.3%

Magnit base case

88

107

123

130

141

Lenta base case

37

38

39

41

42

Extra EBITDA

0

14

15

16

16

Net income

44

50

64

72

83

Magnit base case

32

43

54

59

66

Lenta base case

12

13

15

18

21

Extra EBITDA less tax

0

11

12

12

13

Extra financing costs

 

-18

-18

-18

-18

Net income vs Magnit base case

 

14%

18%

22%

25%

x

 

 

 

 

 

Net debt

212

429

385

327

271

Magnit base case

118

106

83

50

21

Lenta base case

94

82

61

37

11

Extra net debt

 

241

241

240

239

Net debt / EBITDA

1.7

2.7

2.2

1.8

1.4

Source: Renaissance Capital estimates

Figure 65: Sensitivity of an average increase in net income vs base case in 2019-2023E in the above scenario to different deal value and gross margin improvement

MktCap

Lenta's

Premium to

 

 

 

Lenta's gross margin increase

 

 

 

0.60%

0.90%

1.20%

1.50%

1.80%

50%

12%

15%

17%

19%

21%

40%

14%

16%

18%

20%

22%

30%

15%

18%

20%

22%

24%

20%

17%

19%

21%

23%

25%

10%

18%

21%

23%

25%

27%

Source: Renaissance Capital estimates

37

vk.com/id446425943

Renaissance Capital

21 January 2019

Russian retail

Figure 66: Key financial estimates of the combined company in a hypothetical scenario of X5 acquiring Lenta

 

2018E

2019E

2020E

2021E

2022E

Revenue

1,947

2,189

2,377

2,561

2,742

Growth, %

 

12.4%

8.6%

7.7%

7.1%

X5

1,530

1,744

1,902

2,062

2,225

Lenta

418

445

475

499

517

Gross profit

459

522

563

602

645

Margin, %

23.6%

23.8%

23.7%

23.5%

23.5%

X5 base case

370

419

455

489

527

Lenta base case

89

94

99

103

107

Extra gross profit

 

8.8

9.5

10.1

10.7

Extra gross margin (X5)

 

0.20%

0.20%

0.20%

0.20%

Extra gross margin (Lenta)

 

1.20%

1.20%

1.20%

1.20%

SG&A

315

352

383

413

443

as % of revenue

16.2%

16.1%

16.1%

16.1%

16.2%

X5 base case

263

302

329

357

385

Lenta base case

52

56

60

62

65

Savings at Lenta

 

-6

-6

-6

-6

as % of Lenta's SG&A

 

10.0%

10.0%

10.0%

10.0%

EBITDA

144

169

180

189

202

Margin, %

7.4%

7.7%

7.6%

7.4%

7.4%

X5 base case

107

117

125

132

142

Lenta base case

37

38

39

41

42

Extra EBITDA

0

14

15

16

17

Net income

43

39

48

58

71

X5 base case

31

32

39

45

54

Lenta base case

12

13

15

18

21

Extra EBITDA less tax

0

11

12

13

13

Extra financing costs

 

-18

-18

-18

-18

Net income vs X5 base case

 

20%

25%

29%

30%

Net debt

295

544

523

492

447

X5 base case

201

221

222

215

197

Lenta base case

94

82

61

37

11

Extra net debt

 

241

240

240

239

Net debt / EBITDA

2.0

3.2

2.9

2.6

2.2

Source: Renaissance Capital estimates

Figure 67: Sensitivity of an average increase in net income vs base case in 2019-2023E in the above scenario to different deal value and gross margin improvement

MktCap

Lenta's

Premium to

 

 

 

Lenta's gross margin increase

 

 

 

0.60%

0.90%

1.20%

1.50%

1.80%

50%

17%

20%

22%

25%

28%

40%

19%

22%

24%

27%

30%

30%

21%

24%

26%

29%

32%

20%

23%

26%

28%

31%

34%

10%

25%

28%

30%

33%

36%

Source: Renaissance Capital estimates

38