- •Communicative Language Teaching
- •C ommunicative situations
- •Input reading 1
- •Humanistic approach Warming-up discussion 1.1
- •Intensification tendency
- •What features of communicative teaching can you detect in the following activities?
- •Match the following tasks the methods
- •Exploratory task 1.5
- •Input reading 2
- •C ommunicative competence
- •Exploratory task 2.1
- •Exploratory task 2.2
- •Exploratory task 2.3
- •Describe non-verbal communication in your native culture
- •How would you say the following sentences without words, using the gestures only?
- •Exploratory task 2.6
- •Match the following techniques and their features
- •Exploratory task 3.2
- •Exploratory task 3.3
- •Integrated task
- •Illustrate the tasks for teaching pronunciation, grammar and lexis (indicate the source)
- •Answer keys
- •Exploratory task 1.1
- •Glossary
- •References and further reading
- •Brown, g. And g. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cup Bygate, m. 1987. Speaking. Oup
- •Ellis, r. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Cup
What features of communicative teaching can you detect in the following activities?
Activities |
Features |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communicative teaching is a way of teaching a language through communication. The way towards communicative teaching method can be traced in the chart below:
Method |
Grammar-translation |
Audio-lingual method |
Natural approach |
Communicative activities |
Subject |
Language forms |
Language patterns |
Whole language |
Human discourse |
Learning |
Language analysis |
Memorization |
Exposure to the input |
Communication experience |
SAQ 1.2
Match the following tasks the methods
Tasks |
Methods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any method can be described as "result-oriented" or "process-oriented" with some teaching methods occupying an intermediate position. A result-oriented method advocates the idea of a final goal with the emphasis on its speediest achievement and the obligatory equal results achieved by all the learners. A process-oriented method focuses on the teaching/learning procedure with the individual pace of learning and the final results varying according to individual learner differences.
Form-focused methods concentrate teachers' and learners' attention on the grammar forms of the target language. Form-defocused methods focus on speech patterns rather than on grammar structures.
Exploratory task 1.4
Find the adequate place on the axes for the following method: grammar translation, oral approach, audio lingual and communicative (grammar-translation method has been done for you)
Form-focused
Y
Grammar-translation method
Result-oriented. x X Process-oriented
y
Form-defocused
Communicative approach is used differently in different teaching cultures. “Teaching culture” is the collective teaching experience, beliefs and practices, which are typical of a certain community or society.
Communicative approach is not universally relevant for different teaching cultures. The learners can question the effectiveness of the lesson during which they practice communication but do not learn anything concrete. “What have we learned during this lesson of incessant talk?”, is a typical question asked by the learners in Asian communities.
In Japan languages are taught in the typically teacher-fronted and teacher-centered classrooms. A typical lesson consists of the teacher's checking the learner's sentence by sentence translations of a text. Chinese students can be unwilling to ask questions during a communicative lesson because students they do not want to interrupt other students or the teacher, it is better to ask after the lesson etc. (Coleman H. 1996.Society and the Language Classroom. CUP).
A lesson of English in Russia often includes homework check up, presentation of the new material and reinforcement of the new material. The teacher, who signals when a particular learner is invited to speak, will regulate learners' participation in the lesson (Millrood, R. 1999. How Native English Speakers Can be Better English Teachers in Russia. The Internet TESL Journal. Vol..5 No 1 1999. Ellis, G. 1996. How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach? ELTJ. Volume 50/3. P. 213-218)