
- •Subject and Aims of the History of English. Its Ties with Other Disciplines. Germanic Language in the System of Indo-European Family of Languages
- •1. History of English in the systemic conception of English
- •1.1. The aims and the purpose of the study of the subject
- •1.2. Connection of the subject with other disciplines
- •2. Sources of Language History
- •2.1. Writings in early English
- •3. General notes on the language study
- •3.1 The definition of the language
- •3.2 The functions of the language
- •3.3 The structure of the language
- •3.4 The language classification principles
- •3.5 Synchrony and diachrony in the language study
- •4. The comparative-historical method
- •4.1 The stages of the comparative-historical method
- •4.2 The principles of the comparative-historical method
- •4.3 The drawbacks of the comparative-historical method
- •5. The Germanic group of languages
- •The Formation of the English National Language. Periods in the History of the English Language
- •1. Territorial dialects of the period of the Anglo-Saxon invasion
- •2. The dialects of the period of the Norman Conquest
- •3. The development of the dialect of London into a national language
- •Periods in the History of the English Language
- •1. Henry Sweet and his division of the history of English
- •2. Historical periodization as offered by b. Khaimovich
- •3. T. Rastorguyeva’s periodization of the English language
- •4. The division of the history of English as suggested by V. Arakin
- •5. The periods of the development of English as offered by a. Markman and e. Steinberg
- •6. David Burnley’s periodization of the history of English
- •Common Linguistic Features of Germanic Languages
- •1. Phonetic peculiarities of the Germanic languages
- •1.1. The First Consonant Shift
- •1.2. Vowels
- •1.3. The doubling of consonants
- •1.4. Rhotacism
- •1.5. Germanic fracture (or breaking)
- •1.6. The second consonant shift
- •2. Some common grammatical features of Germanic languages
- •2.1. Form-building Means
- •2.1.1. Ablaut
- •2.1.2. Word-structure
- •2.1.3. Types of Stems
- •2.1.4. Strong and Weak Verbs
- •3. Germanic Vocabulary
- •Phonetic Changes in the Old English Period
- •The Main Features of Old, Middle, and Modern English
- •2. Old English Phonetics
- •2.1. Oe Consonants
- •2.2. Vowels
- •2.2.1. Changes of stressed vowels
- •2.2.2. Changes of unstressed vowels
- •Changes in the Middle English Orthography and Phonology
- •1. Changes in the Orthographic System
- •2. Major Changes in the Sound System
- •2.1. The Consonants
- •2.2. Consonant Changes from Old to Middle English
- •2.3. Vowels in Stressed Syllables
- •2.4. Vowels in Unstressed Syllables
- •2.5. The Formation of Middle English Diphthongs
- •The Old English Morphology
- •1. The Old English Noun.
- •2. The Old English Pronoun
- •3. The Old English Adjective
- •4. The Old English Adverb
- •5. The Numeral in Old English
- •6. The Old English Verb.
- •The Middle English Morphology
- •1. Middle English as a Period of Great Change.
- •2. The Middle English Noun.
- •3. Articles.
- •4. The me Adjective.
- •5. The me Adverb
- •6. The me Pronoun
- •7. The me Verb
- •7.1. Strong and weak verbs
- •The New English Morphology and Changes in the System of English Syntax
- •1. New English Morphology
- •2. Old English Syntax.
- •3. Middle English Syntax
- •4. New English Syntax
2.2. Vowels
The symbols representing vowels in classical Old English were usually monofunctional, i.e. each letter corresponded to a certain sound. Vowel-length was often (but not always) denoted by a slanting stroke (a), but we shall use the traditional sign (a).
Monophthongs: short
long
Diphthongs: short
Long
2.2.1. Changes of stressed vowels
a) Palatal Mutation
This is the name given to a kind of regressive assimilation caused by the sounds [i] and [j] in the 6th century. Under the influence of [i] or [j] the vowels of the preceding syllable moved to a higher front position.
E.g. [ā] > [æ] OE
[æ] > [e] Gt. badi || (corresponds to) OE. bedd
[ō] > [ē] Gt. dōmjan || OE. dōm, dēman (E. doom, to deem)
[ū] > [y] OHG. kuning || OE. cyning
ēa
> īe OE. eald but ieldra (E. old – elder)
ēo
The palatal mutation has left many traces in Modern English. The ensuing vowel interchange serves now to distinguish:
different parts of speech: doom – to deem, food – to feed, blood – to bleed, full – to fill, Angles – English, long – length;
different forms of a word: tooth – teeth, foot – feet, mouse – mice, old – elder.
b) Velar Mutation
This is another regressive assimilation called forth by the velar vowels [u, o, a]. It took place in the 7th – 8th centuries and was of comparatively small importance for the further development of the English language. Under the influence of [u, o, a] the front vowels [i, e, æ] of a preceding syllable were usually diphthongized.
As we see, the assimilation was partial, since only part of the front vowels became velar. But after the sound [w] full assimilation occurred.
E.g. OE. widu > wudu (E. wood)
OE. werold > worold (E. world)
c) The Diphthongization of Vowels after Palatal Consonants
After the palatal consonants [j] (written ) and [k`] (written c) most vowels were diphthongized into [ie, io, eo, ea]. It was a long process which continued up to the 9th century, but it did not take place in some of the Old English dialects. Later on these diphthongs were usually monophthongized again.
E.g.
d) The Lengthening of Short Vowels before Certain Consonant Combinations
Before the combinations (ld, nd, mb), i.e. a sonorous consonants plus a homorganic voiced plosive, not followed by a third consonant, short vowels were lengthened, apparently in the 9th century, though graphically it was often marked much later.
E.g.
2.2.2. Changes of unstressed vowels
a. Unstressed long vowels were gradually shortened in all the Germanic languages. In English this process was completed during the earliest part of the Old English period. All the long vowels became short, and all the diphthongs were monophthongized in an unstressed position.
b. Unstressed vowels often fluctuated, which is seen from their representation in spelling.
Comp. OE. woruld, worold;
c. The weakening of unstressed vowels took shape of changes such as the change of [ ] to [e], [u] to [o], etc.
d. Very often the weakening resulted in the loss of the unstressed vowel. After long syllables it occurred earlier and much more often than after short ones.
e. Sometimes new unstressed vowels developed, especially before r, l, n.
In spite of the long process of weakening, the OE final unstressed syllables contain various vowels – a, o, u, e, i.
In comparison with the later stages of its development, Old English strikes one as a language with developed endings, which justifies the name given it by the well-known English philologist H.Sweet – ‘the period of full endings’.
Lecture 5