- •7.Old English Vowels. Gradation. Phonetic changes(breaking, I-mutation, back mutation)
- •3.Back, or Velar Mutation
- •8. Old English Vowels. Phonetic changes( palatalization, contraction, lengthening of Vowels in Certain Conditions)
- •1)Diphthongization after palatal consonants(palatalization)
- •2)Contraction
- •9.Old English Consonants. Phonetic Changes
- •1) Voicing of fricatives in intervocal position
- •10.Old English Morphology.
- •11. Old English Noun. Categories of oe Noun
- •13 Old English paradigm of the Noun and its reflection in Present-day English forms of the noun.
- •14 Old English pronoun. Classes.
- •15 Oe adjective and its categories
- •21. Old English vocabulary
- •22. Middle English. General characteristics of the period.
- •23. The Scandinavian Conquest. The Scandinavian influence on the English language
- •24. The Norman Conquest. French element in the me.
- •25. Changes in the System of Spelling
- •26. Middle English Phonology
- •27. Middle English Noun
- •28. Pronouns in Middle English
- •30.New Categories of the Middle English Verb
- •31.Verbals(Non-finite forms of the verb) in Middle Eng
- •32. Modern Eng.Formation of the national language.Expansion
- •35. Early Modern English Changes of Consonants
- •36. Nominal Parts of Speech in Early Modern English
- •37.Structures with Auxiliary do in Early Modern English
- •38. Changes in the Verbal System of Early Modern English
- •39. Vocabulary of Early Modern English
- •40. Early Modern English Syntax
37.Structures with Auxiliary do in Early Modern English
The verbs do and have are the most persistent in
keeping this old ending, at least they are used with it more frequently than the
others, especially in the function of an auxiliary.
The use of the second person singular ending is limited insomuch as
the pronoun falls out of use. Still, if the pronoun is used, the predicate verb
agrees with it. Notably, in Old and Middle English this ending in the past
tense was found only with the weak verbs, now strong verbs also take it.
The use of to be + the present participle of the verb is rare in the early modern English period, and the modern use, indicating immediate present action, is absent. Such uses as are found appear to intensify the action: ‘let your plough therfore be going and not cease’ (Hugh Latimer, 1549). There existed a gerundial construction which was similar in form—he is a-praying—and which may have influenced the development of the progressive use. The to be + present participle construction had no passive: ‘the ark was being built’ was expressed by the active the ark was building or the gerundial the ark was in building or a-building.
The use of the periphrastic construction in affirmative declarative sentences (I do or did love), however, declined rapidly in the late sixteenth century. After the do-construction had completely displaced the non-periphrastic one in questions and negatives, its use in affirmative declaratives became, in the eighteenth century, a marker of emphasis.
38. Changes in the Verbal System of Early Modern English
During the Early Modern period, English verb inflections became simplified as they evolved towards their modern forms:
• The third person singular present lost its alternate inflections; -(e)th became obsolete while -s survived. (The alternate forms' coexistence can be seen in Shakespeare's phrase, "With her, that hateth thee and hates vs all").
• The plural present form became uninflected. Present plurals had been marked with -en, -th, or -s (-th and -s survived the longest, especially with the plural use of is, hath, and doth). Marked present plurals were rare throughout the Early Modern period, though, and -en was probably only used as a stylistic affectation to indicate rural or old-fashioned speech.
• The second person singular was marked in both the present and past tenses with -st or -est (for example, in the past tense, walkedst or gav'st). Since the indicative past was not (and is not) otherwise marked for person or number, the loss of thou made the past subjunctive indistinguishable from the indicative past for all verbs except to be.
Modal auxiliaries
The modal auxiliaries cemented their distinctive syntactical characteristics during the Early Modern period. Thus, the use of modals without an infinitive became rare (as in "I must to Coventry"; "I'll none of that"). The use of modals' present participles to indicate aspect (as in "Maeyinge suffer no more the loue & deathe of Aurelio" from 1556), and of their preterite forms to indicate tense (as in "he follow'd Horace so very close, that of necessity he must fall with him") also became uncommon.
Some verbs ceased to function as modals during the Early Modern period. The present form of must, mot, became obsolete. Dare also lost the syntactical characteristics of a modal auxiliary, evolving a new past form (dared) distinct from the modal durst.
Perfect and progressive forms
The perfect of the verbs had not yet been standardised to use uniformly the auxiliary verb "to have". Some took as their auxiliary verb "to be", as in this example from the King James Bible, "But which of you ... will say unto him ... when he is come from the field, Go and sit down..." [Luke XVII:7]. The rules that determined which verbs took which auxiliaries were similar to those still observed in German and French (see unaccusative verb).
The modern syntax used for the progressive aspect ("I am walking") became dominant by the end of the Early Modern period, but other forms were also common. These included the prefix a- ("I am a-walking") and the infinitive paired with "do" ("I do walk"). Moreover, the to be + -ing verb form could be used to express a passive meaning without any additional markers: "The house is building" could mean "The house is being built.