Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
www.doc
Скачиваний:
8
Добавлен:
20.11.2018
Размер:
816.13 Кб
Скачать

Can Bayer Cure Its Own Headache? Shareholders would like it to shed everything but health care

On Jan, 24, Germany's biggest drug-maker, Bayer, will make its debut on the New York Stock Exchange. The company, best known for inventing aspirin, in 1897, likely hopes to use its new shares as currency for acquisitions in the world's most profitable drug market: the U. S.

But why should American investors buy into a sluggish, old-fashioned conglomerate? After all, Bayer's German shareholders are deserting the company in droves: Its Frankfurt-traded shares have plunged close to 40% in the past 12 months. Bayer's recent performance indicates that its glory days are behind it.

Bayer can attribute some of its disastrous results to Baycol, the cholesterol-lowering drug that was pulled from the market last year after it was implicated in 52 deaths. But the problems run much deeper. For years, shareholders have tried and failed to persuade management to sell underperforming units and focus on the more lucrative pharmaceuticals business. Citing a recent study by Boston Consulting Group, Bayer executives say conglomerates perform better than more narrowly focused companies over the long term. Yet that's not a convincing argument for one London analyst: "This is a classic case of a company that should be broken up to get some value out of it, but management clearly doesn't agree," he says.

Blame this impasse on Bayer's determination to cling to the now discredited notion that there are real benefits in owning both chemical and pharmaceutical businesses. The synergies, however, aren't there. Just ask other giants of the so-called life-sciences industry. Switzerland's Novartis and Britain's AstraZeneca spun off their agrochemicals units in 2000. Bayer, in contrast, has been expanding its own, buying Aventis Crop Sciences in October for $6.5 billion. The acquisition pushed Bayer's net debt to more than $12.5 billion. "Any successful drug company today doesn't have all this baggage of specialty chemicals or plastics," says Barrie James, president of Pharma Strategy Consulting in Huntingdon, England.

Bayer Chairman Manfred Schneider is open to a joint venture. "Ibis could involve part of our activities or even the whole [healthcare] business," he says. Schneider hopes any partner would have a strong position in the U.S. market yet be small enough that Bayer could retain management control. Few drugmakers fit that bill.

Schneider, 63, may need to moderate his criteria if he is ever to find a partner for Bayer. In December, Schneider announced that next year Bayer would separate its four divisions into legally independent entities. The move could open the way for strategic partnerships. But a bolder, fast-working treatment is in order for Bayer's long-suffering shareholders.

BusinessWeek

Exercise 8. Speak on the following topics. Use of other resources is necessary.

  1. Mass customization .

  2. Dell - the company and its boss.

  3. The challenges Dell's computer business has to face.

  4. Outsourcing - ins and outs of the strategy.

UNIT 3

Text

QUALITY ISN'T JUST FOR WIDGETS

Six Sigma, the quality-control and cost-cutting power tool, is proving its worth on the service side

IN the world of manufacturing, Six Sigma has become something akin to a religion, with none other than John F. Welch as its charismatic apostle. The former chairman and CEO of General Electric Co. came late to this rigorous, statistical approach to quality control. But once he embraced it in 1996, he quickly assembled an unprecedented army of employees to pinpoint and fix problems throughout GE using the number-crunching skills they learned in Six Sigma training.

The results were awesome. In the past three years alone, these troops saved the company $8 billion, according to GE. Little wonder, then, that Welch has won so many converts preaching the cost-cutting power of this methodology.

So what is GE doing with Six Sigma under Welch's successor, Jeffrey R. Immelt? More than ever. The $126 billion conglomerate spent $600 million on Six Sigma projects in 2002 — mostly for the salaries of 4,000 full-time Six Sigma experts, plus 100,000 employees who've undergone, basic training. Altogether, they have a target of finding an additional $2.5 billion in savings in the company.

On top of that, GE is sending out its Six Sigma squads to customers such as Dell Computer and Wal-Mart Stores to help them root out what GE estimates to be more than $1 billion in inefficiencies and waste — and help GE win more business.

GE may be preeminent, but it's certainly not unique in pushing Six Sigma into new comers of its business. Originally conceived by Motorola Inc. as a quality-improvement device in the mid-1980s, Six Sigma soon morphed into a cost-cutting utensil for manufacturers of all stripes. Now, it's fast becoming the Swiss army knife of the business world. Goods producers still make up the bulk of users, who typically rely on statistics to uncover and then reduce product variance in order to boost quality and efficiency. But increasingly, manufacturers are applying Six Sigma to functions as varied as accounts receivable, sales, and research and development.

And their success in these non-factory domains has inspired Six Sigma projects at financial institutions, retailers, health-care concerns, and in other areas of the service sector. Says Gregory H. Watson, a consultant and past president of the American Society for Quality in Milwaukee: "Six Sigma might be the maturation of everything we've learned over the last 100 years about quality."

It's easy to see why Six Sigma works well in large-scale manufacturing. For one, factory processes tend to be both repetitive and easy to track as goods move along the line. Also, companies usually quantify what happens at each step. So, by measuring defects per output, they can quickly assess how a different way of doing things at any stage affects productivity or profits.

Generally the gains add up swiftly as Six Sigma squads discover ways to reduce personnel, capital spending, or overhead. Bosses can then re-deploy staff or take the gain to the bottom line. At Dow Chemical Co., for instance, each Six Sigma project has freed up an average of $500,000 in the first year. In one case the discovery that an additive was causing imperfections in packaging materials enabled Dow to reduce defective items on that line by 70%. Managers claim that in total, such improvements have saved the company more than $750 million since 1999.

Increasingly, however, manufacturers are racking up their big savings far from the factory floor. Dow Chemical, for example, projects it will save another $750 million by the end of next year as it applies Six Sigma to such areas as procurement and sales. And Six Sigma experts at 3M Co. have employed the methodology to reduce inventories and speed up R&D efforts at the company's headquarters. One team even analyzed the performance of sales reps in 3M's orthodontic-products division to identify exactly why its top agents sold so much more than others. And it doesn't stop there. By judging how well employees run fix-it projects, company leaders are hoping to spot their successors. "Six Sigma is about developing tomorrow's managers," says Chairman and CEO W. James McNerney Jr. "It gives them a shot to show what they can do."

Six Sigma isn't a cure-all, to be sure. In the first few months of a project, up-front training costs always outweigh any savings. And through the life of the project, the expense of compiling and analyzing data may also exceed what is saved, particularly in areas where a process cannot be easily standardized.

Even GE, which does thousands of Six Sigma projects a year, concedes it hasn’t yet made much headway in applying Six Sigma to its legal operations. Companies also stand to lose if top management doesn't buy the program and implement the fixes recommended by its top Six Sigma analysts, known as '"black belts."

But that said, GE is still pushing the envelope. Its GE Capital subsidiary recently dispatched a couple of black belts to Dell Computer Corp.'s headquarters in Round Rock, Tex., to analyze its accounts-payable process. After mapping the procedure step by step, they discovered that Dell was getting buried in paper invoices because its just-in-time manufacturing operations required that the company purchase some types of parts as often as 12 times a day. To solve the problem, the GE Capital team moved Dell from its slowpoke manual system to an Internet-based electronic filing setup. Estimated savings: $2.4 million a year.

Although Dell pockets the cash, GE can come out ahead, too. If GE customers are more productive and profitable, GE wagers that the goodwill generated through Six Sigma advice will translate directly into contracts. Jack Welch may have moved on. But to more and more companies, Six Sigma is gospel.

By Michael Arndt in Chicago

Business Week

The Nuts and Bolts of Six Sigma

What is it?

An analytical method aimed at achieving near-perfect results on a production line. In statistics, the Greek letter sigma denotes variation in a standard bell curve. One sigma equals 690,000 defects per 1 million. Most companies do not better than three sigma, or 66,000 errors per million. Six Sigma reduces that count to 3.4 defects per million That saves money by preventing waste.

How does it work?

The tool achieves results by reducing subjective errors in the assessment of problems. First, auditors define a process where results are subpar. Then they measure the process to determine current performance, analyze this information to pinpoint where things are going wrong, and improve the process and eliminate the error. Last, controls arc set up to prevent future bugs.

The language of Six Sigma

Black Belt — Leaders of team responsible for measuring, analyzing, improving and controlling key processes that influence customer satisfaction and/or productivity growth. Black Belts are full-time positions.

Green Belt — Similar to Black Belt but not a full-time position.

Master Black Belt — First and foremost teachers. They also review and mentor Black Belts. Selection criteria for Master Black Belts are quantative skills and the ability to teach and mentor. Master Black Belts are full-time positions.

Variance — A change in a process or business practice that may alter its expected outcome.

Process mapping — illustrated description of how things get done, which enables participants to visualize the entire process and identify areas of strength and weaknesses. It helps reduce cycle time and defects while recognizing the value of individual contributions.

BusinessWeek

Notes

  1. Swiss army knife — швейцарские армейские ножи славятся качеством и обилием приспособлений, что позволяет с их помощью решать множество разнообразных задач

  2. bell curve — колоколообразная кривая, гауссова кривая, кривая нормального распределения

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]