
Учебники / Genetic Hearing Loss Willems 2004
.pdf304 |
Legan et al. |
Composition and supramolecular organisation of the tectorial membrane. Laryngoscope 1997; 97:357–367.
3.Legan PK, Rau A, Keen JN, Richardson GP. The mouse tectorins: modular matrix proteins of the inner ear homologous to components of the sperm-egg adhesion system. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:8791–8801.
4.Cohen-Salmon M, El-Amraoui A, Leibovici M, Petit C. Otogelin: a glycoprotein specific to the acellular membranes of the inner ear. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:14450–14455.
5.Hasko JA, Richardson GP. The ultrastructural organization and properties of the mouse tectorial membrane matrix. Hearing Res 1998; 35:21–38.
6.Simmler M-C, Cohen-Salmon M, El-Amraoui A, Guillard L, Benichou J-C, Petit C, Panthier J-J. Targeted disruption of Otog results in deafness and severe imbalance. Nat Genet 2000; 24:139–143.
7.Richardson GP, Russell IJ, Duance VC, Bailey AJ. Polypeptide composition of the mammalian tectorial membrane. Hearing Res 1987; 25:45–60.
8.Killick R, Malenczak C, Richardson GP. The protein composition of the avian tectorial membrane. Hearing Res 1992; 64:21–38.
9.Killick R, Richardson GP. Antibodies to the sulphated, high molecular mass mouse tectorin stain hair bundles and the olfactory mucus layer. Hearing Res 1997; 103:131–141.
10.Killick R, Legan PK, Malenczak, Richardson GP. Molecular cloning of chick h-tectorin, an extracellular matrix molecule of the inner ear. J Cell Biol 1995; 129:535–547.
11.Countinho P, Goodyear R, Legan PK, Richardson GP. Chick a-tectorin: molecular cloning and expression during embryogenesis. Hearing Res 1999; 130:62– 74.
12.Verhoeven K, Van Laer L, Kirschhofer K, Legan PK, Hughes DC, Schatteman I, Verstreken M, van Hauwe P, Coucke P, Chen A, Smith RJH, Somers T, O eciers FE, van de Heyning P, Richardson GP, Wachtler F, Kimberling WJ, Willems PJ, Govaerts PJ, van Camp G. Mutations in the human a-tectorin gene cause autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing impairment. Nat Genet 1998; 19:60–62.
13.Cross GAM. Glycolipid anchoring of plasma membrane proteins. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1990; 6:1–39.
14.Molloy SS, Bresnahan PA, Leppla SH, Klimpel KR, Thomas G. Human furin is a calcium-dependent serine endoproteinase that recognizes the sequence Arg- X-X-Arg and e ciently cleaves anthrax toxin protective antigen. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:16396–16402.
15.Seidah HG, Chre´tien M. Proprotein and prohormone convertases: a family of subtilases generating diverse polypeptides. Brain Res 1999; 848:45–62.
16.Lisanti MP, Sargiacomo M, Graeve L, Saltiel AR, Rodriguez-Boulan E. Polarized apical distribution of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in a renal epithelial cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 85:9557–9561.
17.Ries A, Gohring W, Fox JW, Timpl R, Sasaki T. Recombinant domains of mouse nidogen-1 and their binding to basement membrane proteins and monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Biochem 2001; 268:5119–5128.
A-Tectorin |
305 |
18.Legan PK, Lukashkina VA, Goodyear RJ, Ko¨ssl M, Russell IJ, Richardson GP. A targeted deletion in a-tectorin reveals that the tectorial membrane is required for the gain and timing of cochlear feedback. Neuron 2000; 28:273–285.
19.Gum JR, Hicks JW, Toribara NW, Siddiki B, Kim YS. Molecular cloning of human intestinal mucin (MUC2) cDNA: identification of the amino terminus and overall sequence similarity to prepro-von Willebrand factor. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:2440–2446.
20.Ruggeri ZM, Ware J. von Willebrand Factor. In: Kreis T, Vale R, eds. Guidebook to the Extracellular Matrix and Adhesion Proteins. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995:105–108.
21.Mayadas TN, Wagner DD. Vicinal cysteines in the prosequence play a role in von Willebrand-factor multimer assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 3531–3535.
22.Bork P, Sander C. A large domain common to sperm receptor (Zp2 and Zp3) and TGF-B type III receptor. FEBS Lett 1992; 300:237–240.
23.Waserman PM, Jovine L, Litscher ES. A profile of fertilization in mammals. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3:E59–E64.
24.Grondin G, St.-Jean P, Beaudoin AR. Cytochemical and immunocytochemical characterization of a fibrillar network (GP2) in pancreatic juice: possible role as a sieve in the pancreatic ductal system. Eur J Cell Biol 1992; 57:155–164.
25.Pennica D, Kohr WJ, Kuang WJ, Glaister D, Aggarwal BB, Chen EY, Goeddel DV. Identification of human uromodulin as the Tamm-Horsfall urinary glycoprotein. Science 1987; 236:83–88.
26.McQueen EG. Composition of urinary casts. Lancet 1966; 1:397–398.
27.Chung YD, Zhu J, Han Y-G, Kernan MJ. NompA encodes a PNS-specific, ZP domain protein required to connect mechanosensory dendrites to sensory structures. Neuron 2001; 29:415–428.
28.Hardy Z, Garbers DL. A sperm membrane protein that binds in a speciesspecific manner to the egg extracellular matrix is homologous to von Willebrand factor. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:26025–26028.
29.Knipper M, Richardson G, Mack A, Mu¨ller M, Goodyear R, Limberger A, Rohbock K, Ko¨pschall I, Zenner H-P, Zimmermann U. Thyroid hormone deficient period prior to the onset of hearing is associated with reduced levels of h-tectorin protein in the tectorial membrane. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:39046– 39052.
30.Rau A, Legan PK, Richardson GP. Tectorin mRNA is spatially and temporally restricted during mouse inner ear development. J Comp Neurol 1999; 405:271– 280.
31.Maeda Y, Fukushima K, Kasai N, Maeta M, Nishizaki K. Quantification of TECTA and DFNA5 expression in the developing mouse cochlea. Neuroreport 2001; 12:3223–3226.
32.Hughes DC, Legan PK, Steel KP, Richardson GP. Mapping of the a-tectorin gene (TECTA) to mouse chromosome 9 and human chromosome 11: a candidate for human autosomal dominant nonsyndromic deafness. Genomics 1998; 48:46–51.
306 |
Legan et al. |
33.Verhoeven K, Van Camp G, Govaerts PJ, Baelemans W, Schatteman I, Verstreken M, Van Laer L, Smith RJH, Brown MR, van de Heyning P, Somer T, O eciers FE, Willems PJ. A gene for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss (DFNA12) maps to chromosome 11q22–24. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 60:1168–1173.
34.Govaerts PJ, De Ceular G, Daemers K, Verhoeven K, van Camp G, Schatteman I, Verstreken M, Willems PJ, Somers T, O eciers FE. A new autosomaldominant locus (DFNA12) is responsible for a nonsyndromic, midfrequency, prelingual and nonprogressive sensorineural hearing loss. Am J Otol 1998; 19: 718–723.
35.Kirschhofer K, Kenyon JB, Hoover DM, Franz P, Weipoltshammer K, Wachtler F, Kimberling WJ. Autosomal-dominant, prelingual, nonprogressive sensorineural hearing loss: localization of the gene (DFNA8) to chromosome 11q by linkage in an Austrian family. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1998; 82:126–130.
36.Kim HJ, Noben-Trauth K, Morell RJ. Tectorin-h (Tectb) maps to mouse chromosome 19. Genomics 1998; 53:419–420.
37.Balciuniene J, Dahl N, Jalonen P, Borg E, Samuelsson E, Koisti MJ, Petterson U, Jazin EE. Evidence for digenic inheritance of nonsyndromic hereditary hearing loss in a Swedish family. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63:786–793.
38.Balciuniene J, Dahl N, Jalonen P, Verhoeven K, van Camp G, Borg E, Petterson U, Jazin EE. Alpha-tectorin involvement in hearing disabilities: one gene—two phenotypes. Hum Genet 1999; 105:211–216.
39.Alloisio N, Morle L, Bozon M, Goder J, Verhoeven K, van Camp G, Plauchu H, Muller P, Collet L, Lina-Granade G. Mutation in the zonadhesin-like domain of a-tectorin associated with autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss. Eur J Hum Genet 1999; 7:255–258.
40.Mustapha M, Weil D, Chardenoux S, Elias S, El-Zir E, Beckmann JS, Loiselet J, Petit C. An a-tectorin gene defect causes a newly identified autosomal recessive form of sensorineural pre-lingual non-syndromic deafness, DFNB21. Hum Mol Genet 1999; 8:409–412.
41.Moreno-Pelayo MA, del Castillo I, Villamar M, Romero L, Herna´ndez-Calvin FJ, Herraiz C, Barbera´R, Navas C, Moreno F. A cysteine substitution in the zona pellucida domain of a-tectorin results in autosomal dominant, postlingual, progressive, mid frequency hearing loss in a Spanish family. J Med Genet 2001; 38:e13.
42.Jovine L, Qi H, Williams Z, Litscher E, Wassarman PM. The ZP domain is a conserved module for polymerisation of extracellular proteins. Nat Cell Biol 2002; 4:457–461.
20
EYA4
Sigrid Wayne and Richard J. H. Smith
University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, U.S.A.
Els de Leenheer and Cor W. R. Cremers
University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
I.INTRODUCTION
A.Background
Hereditary hearing loss may be classified by phenotype as syndromic, in which the hearing loss is associated with other phenotypic anomalies, or nonsyndromic, in which the hearing loss is the sole manifestation of the disorder. Nonsyndromic hereditary hearing loss can be further characterized by mode of inheritance as autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or X-linked—denoted, respectively, by the abbreviation DFNA, DFNB, and DFN, followed by a number indicating the order of locus identification. In addition, hearing loss may adhere to a mitochondrial mode of inheritance. DFNA10 is the tenth of 39 loci identified to date for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss (1). DFNA10 has been localized to the long arm of chromosome 6 (2); the causative gene was recently identified as EYES ABSENT 4 (EYA4) (3), a transcriptional activator with a role in regulating early development events.
B.Families
To date, two families, A and B, have been identified that segregate hearing loss linked to the DFNA10 locus (4) (Fig. 1). Family A is comprised of the descendants of an individual from the Alsace-Lorraine region of France who immigrated to America in 1850. Family B is Belgian in origin. A ected
307
308 |
Wayne et al. |
Figure 1 Pedigrees of DFNA10 a ected families. (A) Simplified pedigree of American Family A. Only one branch is shown in full. (B) Belgian Family B. n, a ected male; 5, una ected male; ., a ected female; o, una ected female. (From Ref. 5.)
EYA4 |
309 |
members of both families share a similar phenotype of postlingual, progressive, sensorineural hearing loss. All a ected individuals have normal speech and language development.
II.AUDIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF DFNA10 PHENOTYPE
A.Evolution of DFNA10 Phenotype with Age
1.Methods
Pure tone and speech audiograms were obtained on 27 a ected individuals in Family A, age range 15–87 years. Air conduction thresholds (decibels hearing level) were used for cross-sectional linear regression analysis, to analyze progression at each frequency. Bone conduction levels were obtained to confirm sensorineural hearing loss. To explore the e ects of presbyacusis on the DFNA10 phenotype, analyses were repeated with thresholds corrected for age and sex according to ISO 7029 norms.
2.Results
All a ected individuals dated the onset of hearing loss within the first three decades of life (5). During the second and third decades of life, fairly rapid progression of hearing loss is seen (Fig. 2). The derived mean threshold deterioration is approximately 2–3 decibels (dB) per year over all frequencies. After age 30 years, the rate of progression of hearing loss slows to approximately 0.6 dB/year, which, when corrected for the e ects of presbyacusis, is not significant. Thus, DFNA10 hearing loss is postlingual in onset, progressive over the first three decades of life, and followed by further gradual progression that can be attributed to normal presbyacusis.
B.Phenotype Comparison of Families A and B
Linear regression analysis was performed using pure tone thresholds obtained from 25 a ected persons from Family A and 17 a ected persons from Family B. Age-related audiograms were constructed (Fig. 3). Both families demonstrate flat-to-gently sloping audiograms, which evolve with advancing age to a steeply sloping configuration. The hearing loss in Family A appears to be slightly more severe than in Family B.
III.CLONING OF EYA4, THE CAUSATIVE GENE OF DFNA10
A.Linkage Mapping
The DFNA10 locus was originally mapped by linkage analysis on the American Family A in 1996 to a 15-cM interval on chromosome 6q22–23
310 |
Wayne et al. |
Figure 2 Cross-sectional threshold-on-age data (air conduction threshold in right ear). Circles and bold solid lines relate to the linear regression analysis in all cases (age over 15 years). Asterisks and dotted lines relate to age-corrected thresholds. Audiograms from a single individual from Family A are shown separately with squares and thin solid lines. (From Ref. 5.)
EYA4 |
311 |
Figure 3 Age-related typical audiograms of (A) Family A and (B) Family B. Italics indicate age in years. (From Ref. 5.)

312 |
Wayne et al. |
delimited by the markers D6S474 and D6S270 (2). By expanding the pedigree to include distant branches of the family, the DFNA10 interval was refined to 2.8 cM flanked by D6S472 and D6S975, although haplotype inconsistencies in two persons prompted reanalysis of the data. These individuals were subsequently omitted from the pedigree, thereby increasing the size of the DFNA10 interval to a 6-cM region flanked by D6S413 and D6S292 (3).
B.Identification of Candidate Gene
The newly refined DFNA10 interval was found to contain several known genes, including an excellent candidate, EYA4, the most recently identified member of the vertebrate EYA gene family (6). The EYA gene family encodes a family of transcriptional activators that interact with other proteins in a conserved regulatory hierarchy to ensure normal embryological development. Mutations in another member of this family, EYA1, are associated with syndromic hearing loss in branchio-oto-renal (BOR) syndrome (7,8).
C.Mutation Screening of DFNA10 Families (3)
1.Mutation Screening of Family A
Family A was screened for mutations in the coding region of EYA4 by singlestrand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of its 21 exons, revealing a striking band shift in exon 12 that segregated with the hearing loss
Figure 4 SSCP result of EYA4 exon 12 for Family A. Each lane on the gel is the SCCP result of the individual in the pedigree directly above. A dramatic shift segregates with the hearing loss. Individual on the far right is a normal-hearing, unrelated control. n, a ected male; 5, una ected male; ., a ected female; o, una ected female; /, deceased. (From Ref. 3.)
EYA4 |
313 |
Figure 5 Sequencing results for EYA4. (A) In Family A, a portion of the electropherogram for EYA4 exon 12 sequenced from subcloned PCR products demonstrates the insertion of 2 adenine residues (arrows) in one allele of the a ected individual; wild-type sequence is seen in the other allele (compare to una ected alleles). (B) In Family B, a portion of the electropherogram for EYA4 exon 20 shows a cytosine- to-thymine transition (arrow), resulting in a premature stop codon (TGA). (From Ref. 3.)
(Fig. 4). Direct sequencing of exon 12 produced an electropherogram featuring the superimposition of two sequences, suggesting a frameshift mutation. By sequencing of subclones of exon 12 PCR products from a ected and un- a ected family members, the mutation was characterized as the insertion of two adenine residues at position 1468 (1468insAA) (Fig. 5A). This mutation is predicted to generate a frameshift and premature stop codon in exon 14.
2.Mutation Screening of Family B
SSCP analysis of EYA4 in Family B revealed no band shifts segregating with the hearing loss; however, direct sequencing of all exons identified a cy- tosine-to-thymine transition in exon 20 at position 2200 (2200C!T) that segregated with the hearing loss. This base change converts an arginine codon (CGA) to a stop codon (TGA) (Fig. 5B).
IV. EYA PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
A.General Structure of EYA Proteins
The EYA gene family encodes a family of transcriptional activators that interact with other proteins in a conserved regulatory hierarchy to ensure