- •1 Introduction
- •1.1 What makes eigenvalues interesting?
- •1.2 Example 1: The vibrating string
- •1.2.1 Problem setting
- •1.2.2 The method of separation of variables
- •1.3.3 Global functions
- •1.3.4 A numerical comparison
- •1.4 Example 2: The heat equation
- •1.5 Example 3: The wave equation
- •1.6 The 2D Laplace eigenvalue problem
- •1.6.3 A numerical example
- •1.7 Cavity resonances in particle accelerators
- •1.8 Spectral clustering
- •1.8.1 The graph Laplacian
- •1.8.2 Spectral clustering
- •1.8.3 Normalized graph Laplacians
- •1.9 Other sources of eigenvalue problems
- •Bibliography
- •2 Basics
- •2.1 Notation
- •2.2 Statement of the problem
- •2.3 Similarity transformations
- •2.4 Schur decomposition
- •2.5 The real Schur decomposition
- •2.6 Normal matrices
- •2.7 Hermitian matrices
- •2.8 Cholesky factorization
- •2.9 The singular value decomposition (SVD)
- •2.10 Projections
- •2.11 Angles between vectors and subspaces
- •Bibliography
- •3 The QR Algorithm
- •3.1 The basic QR algorithm
- •3.1.1 Numerical experiments
- •3.2 The Hessenberg QR algorithm
- •3.2.1 A numerical experiment
- •3.2.2 Complexity
- •3.3 The Householder reduction to Hessenberg form
- •3.3.2 Reduction to Hessenberg form
- •3.4 Improving the convergence of the QR algorithm
- •3.4.1 A numerical example
- •3.4.2 QR algorithm with shifts
- •3.4.3 A numerical example
- •3.5 The double shift QR algorithm
- •3.5.1 A numerical example
- •3.5.2 The complexity
- •3.6 The symmetric tridiagonal QR algorithm
- •3.6.1 Reduction to tridiagonal form
- •3.6.2 The tridiagonal QR algorithm
- •3.7 Research
- •3.8 Summary
- •Bibliography
- •4.1 The divide and conquer idea
- •4.2 Partitioning the tridiagonal matrix
- •4.3 Solving the small systems
- •4.4 Deflation
- •4.4.1 Numerical examples
- •4.6 Solving the secular equation
- •4.7 A first algorithm
- •4.7.1 A numerical example
- •4.8 The algorithm of Gu and Eisenstat
- •4.8.1 A numerical example [continued]
- •Bibliography
- •5 LAPACK and the BLAS
- •5.1 LAPACK
- •5.2 BLAS
- •5.2.1 Typical performance numbers for the BLAS
- •5.3 Blocking
- •5.4 LAPACK solvers for the symmetric eigenproblems
- •5.6 An example of a LAPACK routines
- •Bibliography
- •6 Vector iteration (power method)
- •6.1 Simple vector iteration
- •6.2 Convergence analysis
- •6.3 A numerical example
- •6.4 The symmetric case
- •6.5 Inverse vector iteration
- •6.6 The generalized eigenvalue problem
- •6.7 Computing higher eigenvalues
- •6.8 Rayleigh quotient iteration
- •6.8.1 A numerical example
- •Bibliography
- •7 Simultaneous vector or subspace iterations
- •7.1 Basic subspace iteration
- •7.2 Convergence of basic subspace iteration
- •7.3 Accelerating subspace iteration
- •7.4 Relation between subspace iteration and QR algorithm
- •7.5 Addendum
- •Bibliography
- •8 Krylov subspaces
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.3 Polynomial representation of Krylov subspaces
- •8.4 Error bounds of Saad
- •Bibliography
- •9 Arnoldi and Lanczos algorithms
- •9.2 Arnoldi algorithm with explicit restarts
- •9.3 The Lanczos basis
- •9.4 The Lanczos process as an iterative method
- •9.5 An error analysis of the unmodified Lanczos algorithm
- •9.6 Partial reorthogonalization
- •9.7 Block Lanczos
- •9.8 External selective reorthogonalization
- •Bibliography
- •10 Restarting Arnoldi and Lanczos algorithms
- •10.2 Implicit restart
- •10.3 Convergence criterion
- •10.4 The generalized eigenvalue problem
- •10.5 A numerical example
- •10.6 Another numerical example
- •10.7 The Lanczos algorithm with thick restarts
- •10.8 Krylov–Schur algorithm
- •10.9 The rational Krylov space method
- •Bibliography
- •11 The Jacobi-Davidson Method
- •11.1 The Davidson algorithm
- •11.2 The Jacobi orthogonal component correction
- •11.2.1 Restarts
- •11.2.2 The computation of several eigenvalues
- •11.2.3 Spectral shifts
- •11.3 The generalized Hermitian eigenvalue problem
- •11.4 A numerical example
- •11.6 Harmonic Ritz values and vectors
- •11.7 Refined Ritz vectors
- •11.8 The generalized Schur decomposition
- •11.9.1 Restart
- •11.9.3 Algorithm
- •Bibliography
- •12 Rayleigh quotient and trace minimization
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 The method of steepest descent
- •12.3 The conjugate gradient algorithm
- •12.4 Locally optimal PCG (LOPCG)
- •12.5 The block Rayleigh quotient minimization algorithm (BRQMIN)
- •12.7 A numerical example
- •12.8 Trace minimization
- •Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY |
129 |
Remark 6.8. Notice that we have not proved global convergence. Regarding this issue consult the book by Parlett [3] that contains all of this and more.
RQI converges ‘almost always’. However, it is not clear in general towards which eigenpair the iteration converges. So, it is wise to start RQI only with good starting vectors. An alternative is to first apply inverse vector iteration and switch to Rayleigh quotient iteration as soon as the iterate is close enough to the solution. For references on this technique see [4, 1]. 
Remark 6.9. The Rayleigh quotient iteration is expensive. In every iteration step another system of equations has to be solved, i.e., in every iteration step a matrix has to be factorized. Therefore, RQI is usually applied only to tridiagonal matrices. 
6.8.1A numerical example
The following MATLAB script demonstrates the power of Rayleigh quotient iteration. It expects as input a matrix A, an initial vector x of length one.
%Initializations
k = 0; rho = 0; ynorm = 0;
while abs(rho)*ynorm < 1e+15,
k = k + 1; if k>20, break, end rho = x’*A*x;
y = (A - rho*eye(size(A)))\x; ynorm = norm(y);
x = y/ynorm;
end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We invoked this routine with the matrix |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
−1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A = |
− |
|
... |
−... ... |
|
|
R9×9 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
− |
1 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
− |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− |
|
|
|
|
|
and the initial vector x = [−4, −3, . . . , 4]T . The numbers obtained are
k |
rho |
ynorm |
|
|
|
1 |
0.6666666666666666 |
3.1717e+00 |
2 |
0.4155307724080958 |
2.9314e+01 |
3 |
0.3820048793104663 |
2.5728e+04 |
4 |
0.3819660112501632 |
1.7207e+13 |
5 |
0.3819660112501051 |
2.6854e+16 |
|
|
|
The cubic convergence is evident.
Bibliography
[1]C. BEATTIE AND D. FOX, Localization criteria and containment for Rayleigh Quotient iteration, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 10 (1989), pp. 80–93.
130 |
CHAPTER 6. VECTOR ITERATION (POWER METHOD) |
[2]R. A. HORN AND C. R. JOHNSON, Matrix Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.
[3]B. N. PARLETT, The Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cli s, NJ, 1980. (Republished by SIAM, Philadelphia, 1998.).
[4]D. B. SZYLD, Criteria for combining inverse and Rayleigh Quotient iteration, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 25 (1988), pp. 1369–1375.
